As the repercussions of the same sex marriage vote in the British Parliament continue to reverberate around the world, the question on everyone's lips is, why did PM David Cameron push this through against the wishes of the majority of his own MP's, against the wishes of the majority of his party members, against the wishes of all the religious groups and most importantly of all, against the wishes of the majority of the British people?
Cameron's friend and fellow remote metropolitan elitist, George Osbourne, must know something the rest of us don't when it comes to election strategy. As Cameron's election strategist Osbourne is either blind, stupid or a combination of both.
Statistics and polls on the repercussions of this lunacy were abundant and they were known in advance by the Cameron/Osbourne strategy team. These included the views of the homosexual community itself. ( The population percentage of homosexuals in the UK varies between 1.5% and 4.2%. Some surveys have it as high as 9% )
An earlier ComRes poll indicated that the marriage issue was not a priority for the majority of homosexuals, less than half said the opportunity to get married was important, only 27% said they would avail themselves of the opportunity to get married. That's 27% of 4.2% of the population.
The majority of the homosexual community claimed that Cameron was using this issue to make his party look compassionate and as a means of boosting his own image. One has to ask the question, boosting his image with who?
The same poll claimed that 70% of the British people agreed with the Church that the definition of marriage should be left alone.
Statistics and polls could be inaccurate or interpreted as the reader pleases but actions speak louder than statistics and it has been reported that membership of the Conservative Party has dropped from around 250,000 when Cameron became leader to 150,000 today.
Cameron's own MP's are predicting that after this vote, 10% of the remaining number will lost this week alone.
As these repercussions were known in advance and coupled with the fact that Cameron is attacking his own MP's as bigots and out of touch, it would appear that he is deliberately trying to destroy his own party. He is finishing the job that Moscow and the Labour Party started at the end of World War II.
The truth is that representative politics and the very nature of democracy itself, has been changing for the worse in Great Britain and the world at large since the end of WW II.
Traditionally, politicians were chosen from the community, by the community, to represent the community. These have been replaced by career politicians who are chosen or approved by remote party machines to impose their particular agenda on the people whether the people agree to it or not.
These new career politicians have no experience in the real world of their constituents nor can they identify with their lives or issues.
They are incapable of independent thought and can only speak in slogans and soundbites which are given to them by the party whips at the start of each day.
They have been trained in media skills, at taxpayer expense, not to speak the truth but to repeat the soundbites and push the party line at every opportunity.
Advances in technology have enabled politicians from all countries to meet and communicate on a regular basis allowing those with a similar ideology to act globally and with the advent of the United Nations the global 'progressive' movement was born.
It is with this movement that David Cameron is boosting his image with not the British people or the Conservative Party. The other two party idiots, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband signed up years ago.
The British people are not alone.
With the re-election of the Progressive in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, the last obstacle to the global 'progressive agenda, as been removed and they are all on a roll.
The ending of traditional marriage is high on the 'progressive' agenda thus homosexual marriage is being pushed in all parts of the globe against the wishes of the people.
The Progressive in Chief even mentioned homosexual marriage in his recent inauguration speech so he means business.
In California a politically activist judge overturned the result of a democratic ballot which opposed homosexual marriage. The Progressive in Chief and his Attorney General, Eric Holder have indicated they will ignore their own countries' laws when it comes to the Defence of Marriage Act.
With the passing of this Bill in the British Parliament the 'progressive' transformation agenda advances a little further, both in Great Britain and the rest of the developed world.
The British people should pay attention to the of the actions of their representatives and ask themselves whether these actions are in their interests or to advance a different agenda.
David 'Call me Dave' Cameron has labelled himself as a 'progressive' conservative and the heir to Blair but by his actions against the British people over the European Union and traditional marriage, he has demonstrated that his loyalty is with his fellow 'progressive' politicians in a new transformed world.
*Update: Why is it that Call Me Dave and his 'progressive' elite want to abolish traditional marriage and the family? Nick Clegg and his party of liars and cheats claim that as an institution it is out of date.
If that's the case then why didn't they say so at election time instead of parading their families before the media while simultaneously cheating on their wives and children as per Chris Huhne and that pinnacle of foulness Mark Oaten and others.
As far as Red Ed Miliband and his crew of communist sympathisers are concerned its an ideological requirement that is written in their sacred text.
"The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property.."
"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists."
"The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its compliment vanishes and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital".
The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by action of Modern Industry.."
The Communist Manifesto (section 2) - Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels