Emma Thompson - Dump Syrian Refugees In Blighted Britain

There is something about the acting profession that not only drives out any common sense that they may have been born with but also allows them to live their lives completely devoid of reality.

The latest in a long line of entertainers to demonstrate that they live on a different planet to the rest of us is award winning actress Emma Thompson. She joined a group of celebrities, which included Sting, Downton Abbey's Michelle Dockery and others, in sending an open letter to British Prime Minister David Cameron condemning the government's resettlement program for Syrian refugees as inadequate.

These celebrities state in their letter that the are 'ashamed' of the British government's failure to relocate more Syrian refugees to Great Britain. There is no indication in their letter of how many they want to resettle but the fact that fifty percent of all Syrians have been displaced as a result of the ongoing civil war is an indication of the enormity of the problem.

Why these celebrities have chosen the Syrian civil war and not one of the scores of other civil wars around the world that are displacing millions of people requires an explanation.

What have the displaced citizens of Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Kashmir and other war ravaged countries done to deserve being overlooked by Ms. Thompson and her friends?

Emma Thompson's abilities as an actress are beyond question, her abilities as a political analyst however are somewhat lacking.

A supporter of the Labour Party and socialism, she claims that Great Britain is a rich country which should be doing more to alleviate the suffering of the Syrians. This is an easy position to take from the vantage point of affluent West Hamptstead, one of the most exclusive parts of London, and an estimated $45 million fortune, but not so for millions of her fellow citizens who are mired in poverty.

Far from being a rich country, the British economy was bankrupted by the last Labour government under the stewardship of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. The various governments to date have accumulated over one trillion in debt and are still borrowing close to one hundred billion per year.

In addition to this economic disaster, there is a shortage of housing, school places and jobs; social and physical infrastructure are collapsing under the weight of an unprecedented increase in population.

Millions of her fellow citizens are in fuel and financial poverty with the use of food banks at an all time high. The National Health Service has failed and is no longer fit for purpose.  In addition, crime and ethnic conflict are spiraling out of control. All this is a result of her Labour Party's socialist policies together with the imposition of 'multi-culturalism' using open border mass immigration.

It is incumbent upon Emma Thompson and the rest of the multi-millionaire celebrities to enlighten the British people as to where these refugees are going to live and where their children will go to school?

It would also be nice to know how they are going to be financed in the future when Great Britain itself is starting to resemble that part of the world from whence the refugees came.

There are a number of false assumptions and inconsistencies in their letter that need to be highlighted:

The Prime Minister "is in a position to offer some of the most vulnerable people in the world safety in Great Britain". No he isn't, it's not exclusively his country to do has he wishes.  As stated previously, the country is broke with no jobs, no houses etc. and the British people have had enough of immigration, they would not consent if, in the unlikely event, they were asked.

"This issue isn't about migration statistics or party politics, its about people. Its about the values that we in Britain hold dear; compassion and humanity".

When she and her cohorts use "we in Britain" they are creating the illusion that we are all in it together, suffering the governments austerity program and drop in living standards in equal measure. This is a PR device that rich celebrities regularly employ to convey a proletarian image.

The fact is that for this group of wealthy elites nothing has changed, they still live the affluent lifestyle that their fellow citizens can only dream about. They can shuttle between their multiple homes and holiday resorts without the lack of money being prohibitive.

If Ms Thompson, Sting and the rest of them were serious about "compassion and humanity" being a value that they hold dear, then maybe they would consider financing some refugees out of their personal fortunes and accommodating some in their multiple residences.

As far as being 'ashamed' of the British people's failure over Syrian refugees, Ms Thompson and her friends should take note and acknowledge the hundreds of thousands of Somali's, Pakistanis, Nigerians, Yemenis, Afghans, Iraqis, Eritreans, etc ad nauseam who have already been given sanctuary in Great Britain.

This doesn't include the millions of economic migrants from the poorest parts of the European Union.

In many cases the British people have been rewarded for their "compassion and humanity" with an explosion of violent crime including mass murder, the rape and horrific sexual abuse of their children and ever increasing demands to eradicate their culture and way of life.
(Examples of immigrant crime wave here, here here and here)

The solution to the problems resulting from civil wars is not the mass relocation of populations, that only creates discord and degradation in the host countries; this fact is probably beyond the capabilities of remote, wealthy celebrities to understand.

Its easy to be compassionate and humane with someone else's money and when one doesn't suffer the consequences of degradation and violent, ethnic related conflict that mass immigration from the third world brings.

Saudi Autocrat Dies - A Setback For Human And Women's Rights?

One would be forgiven for thinking that the death of Saudi Arabian absolute monarch and autocrat, King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud, would have been greeted with polite indifference by the leaders of the civilised world as it was by the majority of the civilised people they are paid to represent.

The level of fawning and contrived condolences for the leader of a medieval desert kingdom was revealing considering that the Saudi people themselves didn't appear to be that bothered. There is no shortage of autocrats-in-waiting ready and willing to take over the Kingdom and continue the head chopping, limb amputating, women stoning, human rights denying dictatorship with which we have become all too familiar.

Most pundits cite oil and the politics of oil for this grovelling subservience but America and Great Britain import approximately fifteen percent and four percent per annum respectively.

Competition for inward investment is cited as another reason. Since Saudi Arabia comprises mainly of hostile desert there's not a lot of investment opportunities for their vast oil revenues, therefore large parts of the civilised world, including up market areas London and New York, is home to Saudi oil money in the form of prime real estate holdings along with other valuable assets.

Arms sales and other military hardware are up there as an excuse but to what purpose when the last big middle east wars needed American and British led coalitions to save their bacon ass*s.

The odious behavior and vulgar profligacy of Saudi citizens in the west, along with their staggering hypocrisy, is legendary. Without a thought for the supposedly ultra-conservative version of Islam they impose at home, they indulge in activities such as drinking alcohol, whoring, rent boys, gambling, abusing domestic staff etc. while driving around in their Lamborghini's and refusing to pay their parking tickets.

Being even the remotest member of the Saudi royal family usually guarantees immunity from law breaking which would earn them one of their world renown punishments should they indulge in such activities back in their desert homeland.

Bearing in mind that fifteen of the nineteen hijackers that killed almost three thousand innocent Americans were Saudi nationals, some three hundred were allowed to leave the USA immediately after the 9/11 atrocity without investigation. This included some two dozen members of Osama bin Laden's family.

Political analysts in the west often cite geo-politics, including middle east stability, for their grovelling but this cannot be a credible reason for western leaders to abandon all they hold sacred in terms of freedom, individual liberty and more importantly human and women's rights.

These are the issues that evolved over centuries and define the difference between the civilised world and the medieval world ruled over by Saudi Arabian Kings, despotic Sheikhs and other brutal autocratic leaders who worship death like people in the west worship life.

The sight of the President of the United States of America, the supposed leader of the free world, bowing and scraping to a medieval despot should send shudders down the spine of any freedom loving civilised human being.

Likewise listening to the servile grovelling of British Prime Minister David Cameron and the demented assertion by IMF leader, Christine Lagarde, that King Abdullah was "in a discreet way a strong advocate of women".

He was such an advocate of women that he had some thirty wives including Alanoud Al Fayez who he divorced for the sin of bearing him four daughters but no sons.

According to Al Fayez, now residing in exile in London, her daughters were being abused and held prisoner by King Abdullah as they are today by the his replacement, King Salman bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud.

She has requested President Obama to intercede on her behalf to get her daughters released from bondage but judging by his actions toward Saudi royalty in the past the odds are not in her favour.

How a person with the stature and power of Christine Lagarde can make such an obviously ridiculous, and knowingly false, assertion is an indication of the deceit that the new global leadership will employ to hoodwink the people in order to impose their agenda.

British Prime Minister David Cameron is as renown for his appeasement of Islam at home as he is for making false promises in pursuit of votes.

His grovelling message on the death of the despot was nothing short of embarrassing.

"I am deeply saddened to hear of the death of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, His Majesty King Abdullah bin Abn Al Aziz Al Saud".

No other leader of note outside the Arab world  has used the moniker "Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques". This is Cameron burnishing his pro-Islamic credentials in full pursuit of the Muslim vote in the up coming British general election.

He uses this title for the despot of a medieval desert Kingdom but he never extends the courtesy of using her correct title when referring to his own monarch:

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

In his recent joint press conference in Washington DC he referred to the President of the United States and alleged leader of the free world as "Barack".
    
It is widely accepted that Saudi Arabia aids and finances terrorist groups and insurgencies around the world together with the financing of mosque and madrassa building in the west. These are used to spread Wahhabism, their own virulent version of Islam, therefore it is more than incredulous that Cameron should continue thus:

"...he will be remembered for his commitment to peace and for strengthening understanding between faiths".

"I sincerely hope that the long and deep ties between our two Kingdoms will continue and we can continue to work together to strengthen peace and prosperity in the world".

In conclusion its worth adding that while, Christine Lagarde, David Cameron and the rest of the world leaders were ingratiating themselves with tyrants and despots. Raif Badawi was getting another nine hundred and fifty lashes for blogging and some unfortunate woman screamed her innocence as she was beheaded in the street for apparent child abuse.

Fox News - David Cameron's Supporters Club

Watching the reports by Fox News on the recent Dog and Pony Show starring President Barack Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron one would be forgiven for thinking that Cameron was the pinnacle of candour and honesty.

It is to be expected that Fox News will make political capital out of Cameron's use of words such as Islamic and terrorism in the same sentence in order to contrast their own President's steadfast refusal to do the same for reasons known only to him and his inner circle. Making political capital however should not be at the expense of the truth.

Fox News and the public at large are left to speculate as to why the President is unwilling to link the global atrocities that are carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah, as directed by their prophet, Mohammad, and as written in their holy book, the Koran, with Islam.

David Cameron is getting some very undeserved kudos for his apparent candour and his bold proposals to deal with Islamic terrorists when just a smidgen of research would expose him for the media created, machine politician that he so obviously is.

One only has to look back to last August when he was being praised by Fox News for cutting short his summer vacation after a British documented Muslim, known as Jihadi John, beheaded American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff. This was in contrast to President Obama who made a perfunctory statement before moving on to the 19th hole.

The narrative at the time was that Cameron took decisive action by convening a meeting of COBRA, the governments emergency committee that details a response to any national crisis or events abroad that may have major implications for Great Britain.

Following this meeting Cameron gave the customary press conference where he outlined the tough action he proposed to take in order to deal with British jihadis and radical Islam.

He was praised to the heavens for taking tough actions such as confiscating the passports of jihadis fighting for ISIS thus preventing their return, preventing jihadis from travelling to Iraq, Syria or Somalia, taking the preachers of hate off the streets and closing down the centres of radicalisation such as certain mosques and madrassas.

It might come as a surprise to Fox News and its contributors, but not to the British people, that Cameron is not as tough as they make him out to be because none of these actions have been carried out.

After convening a meeting with COBRA, David Cameron made these same promises in May 2013 after the murder of British soldier Lee Rigby on a London Street in broad daylight by two radicalised British documented Muslims.

At least one of these killers was in contact with Great Britain's most notorious, and obnoxious, preacher of hate, Anjem 'Andy' Choudary.

Far from being removed from the streets Choudary is a walking, talking, radicalising, no-go zone, who has been given celebrity status. He is much in demand by the worlds media including Fox News.

No mosques or madrassas have been closed down.  On the contrary, mosque building is continuing at the same or increasing rate.

No passports have been confiscated. Jihadis are still departing to the war zones and they are also legally returning ready to put their newly acquired skills to use in the name of Allah as they have so often promised to do.

The breeding grounds for radical Muslims and jihadis continues to flourish in Great Britain's mono-cultural, sharia controlled ghettos without hindrance from David Cameron's government or its agencies.

To put the record straight for benefit of the American people and Fox News in particular; with a general election due in May 2015, Cameron's spin doctor choreographed public performances are for home consumption where his hold on power has been threatened by the inexorable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, known as UKIP, who's spin free, politically incorrect message is resonating with the long suffering British people.

It is understandable that the American people, including Fox News and its contributors, can be seduced by Cameron's rhetoric which he delivers with clear diction and perfectly accented English but they must not let themselves be fooled entirely.

Despite his dulcet tones, he is the consummate media created machine politician who can deliver flawless choreographed, public performances as manufactured by his army of PR men, media managers and image consultants.

There is a bright spot to this story; it would appear that if Fox News was fooled by David Cameron's PR performance their Congressmen were not. One of the reasons for his visit to Washington was to lobby Congress on the President's behalf against imposing further sanctions on Iran. By all accounts they told him to p*ss off and rightly so.

A previous article on America's liking for Cameron here.




 

Last March Of The Hypocrites - But Where's Obama?

Apart from being the biggest gathering of hypocrites ever assembled in the same place at any one time, the recent misnamed Unity March in Paris will be notable for three things in particular:

i) Apart from Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu who has to deal with Muslim terrorism every day, it was nothing more than a photo opportunity for the Premiers of Europe who will do absolutely nothing to change the disastrous course that has led to the rise of jihadis in their respective countries.

ii) The march will not stop the attempts by these same political leaders to muzzle the press, to limit freedom of expression and to close down debate on contentious issues which questions the unpopular agenda's they are imposing upon their citizens.

iii) The unsurprising absence of the so called leader of the free world or any other senior official from the now 'fundamentally transformed' United States of America.

This will be the last March of the Hypocrites the world will witness. The peoples of Europe, if not the civilised world as a whole, have woken up to the dangers of the Muslim fifth columns in their midst together with the cynical use of this community by an agenda driven political class as a battering ram to impose so called 'multi-cultural societies'.

Anyone with a modicum of decency will have watched the stomach churning hypocrisy of the political elite as they milked the mass outrage for all its worth. They participated in this charade with the intention of fooling the world that they actually sympathise with the freedom of expression as exercised by the murdered Charlie Hebdo staff, or that they oppose radical Islam.

France's socialist President Francois Hollande can barely disguise his personal hatred of Jews along with his support for pro-Palestinian terrorist organisations. With no effective preventative action from Hollande, anti-semitism in France has reached Vichy levels with the Jewish community fleeing for their lives in ever increasing numbers.

Hollande's hatred for Netanyahu and the Jewish people manifested itself with his ban on the Israeli Prime Minister attending the march. In a calculated insult to every murdered Jew, Hollande invited Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of one of the world's most blood drenched terrorist organisations, the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO), after Netanyahu signalled his intention to attend regardless of Hollande's ban.

British Prime Minister David Cameron's contribution to a free press was to set up the Leveson inquiry into Press ethics. Ostensibly this was to deal with phone hacking but in reality it was to instigate government controlled regulation on behalf of political operators and celebrities who wanted to keep their dodgy shenanigans secret.

His cynical manipulation of "Je Suis Charlie" for self publicity reasons becomes apparent with his proposed 'Snooper's Charter' legislation. This will give the government unfettered access to British citizens' private phone calls, emails and social media activity.

If this isn't authoritarian enough Cameron wants to end the peoples ability to communicate privately by banning any form of encrypted communication while attempting to regulate Bloggers with a requirement that political commentators register with the Electoral Commission.

Cameron's use of Muslims to downgrade and eventually erase Great Britain's Judeo-Christian heritage in order to impose multi-culturalism on the people is now the stuff of legend. Apart from ignoring the preachers of hate while they radicalise young people, and by indulging every Muslim demand he is using rigidly policed political correctness to harass and silence any dissenting voices.

His assertion that there are too many white Christian faces in civic society, the establishment and British institutions is incontrovertible proof of Cameron's commitment to the cultural replacement agenda.

No matter what atrocities  are committed by radical Muslims, David Cameron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are committed to using their Muslim populations to impose 'multi-culturalism' on their citizens without their consent. The German people are rising up against the spread of semi-autonomous Muslim ghettos and are taking to the streets in ever increasing numbers to voice their opposition.

Danish socialist Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt is presiding over a country that has succumbed to Islamification and Muslim violence but she takes no action. Cultural replacement using imposed multi-culturalism takes precedent over the safety and well being of the indigenous Danish population.

The same is true for Sweden, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands and France etc.

Cameron, Merkel and every other European leader who participated in the "Je Suis Charlie" choreographed photo-opportunity are taking no effective action to stem the tide of immigration from backward Muslim countries like Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan etc. despite the widespread knowledge that these people hate the west, reject western values and will not integrate.

They are taking no effective action to dismantle the infrastructure of mosques, madrassas and hate preachers that are radicalising Muslims thereby ensuring an endless supply of hate filled, motivated jihadis ready and willing to commit murder and mayhem in the name of Allah.

Western and European governments are still arming these jihadis with passports allowing them legitimate travel between their 'home' countries and the killing fields of the Middle East and Africa, This act promises to be one of the most potent weapons for bringing the Muslim jihad to the west and one has to wonder whether it's an act of jaw dropping stupidity or deliberate policy.

Anyone with an ounce of sense knows it's coming so whether it is stupidity or deliberate policy, no amount of Unity Marches or "Je Suis Charlie" campaigns is going to absolve these politicians from blame when terrorists strike and shed innocent blood in the heart of their respective countries.

Finally, where was President Obama, the so called leader of the free world? It's not like him to miss a photo opportunity. The sad fact is that by their words and actions Obama and his administration have revealed that they are consumed with hatred for western civilisation, especially America.

Unity Marches in Europe are a distraction from his more critical agenda. This is not only to disengage from the developed world but to down grade or 'fundamentally transform'  America from the Judeo-Christian culture of liberty and free enterprise that made it one of the greatest countries in all of history into something resembling the third world.

To Obama and his acolytes the American dream of hard work with eventual success and prosperity for all is offensive to their socialist sensibilities. A disarmed, dependent population addicted to 'free stuff' is much more to their liking.

     

'Life Of Brian' Is Blasphemous And Offensive - Behead Monty Python

"The future must not belong to those that slander the prophet of Islam".

  - President Barack Obama 25th September 2012 at the UN.
               

Brian Cohen:  Who cured you?

Ex Leper:  Jesus did Sir. I was hopping along minding my own business, all of a sudden, up he comes and cures me!..............Bloody do-gooder.

From The Life of Brian - The Monty Python Team

It shouldn't be asking too much for the so called leader of the free world, President Barack Obama, to show a consistent approach toward all religions of the world instead of showing deference to a single one. This is even more important in light of the fact that adherents to his preferred religion are responsible for mass murder on a horrific scale against other religions particularly the one he is supposed to espouse.

It would appear that only the agenda driven political class and those from the 'progressive', self- loathing community remain unaware that Islam seeks to dominate the world and that all other religions and people must be subservient to it.

Led by the leader of the free world, these Dhimmis have the ability to ignore the tens of thousands of cold blooded murders of Christians across the planet, carried out in the name of Allah the Merciful and his prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him?), and still proclaim that Islam is a "great global religion of peace".

Since the 1988 publication of Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie and the fatwa issued by Muslims calling for his murder, the issue of freedom of expression has become one of life and death.

In 2004 Dutch film producer Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered while cycling to work in his native Amsterdam by a Muslim fanatic. His crime was collaborating with Somali born writer Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the short film called Submission, which criticised the role of women in Islam.

In 2005 riots, bloodshed and mayhem around the world followed the publication of cartoons of Mohammad in the Danish publication Jyllands- Posten.

The Last Temptation of Christ by Martin Scorsese was considered to be particularly offensive but the western leaders ignored the objections of the offended Christian community as they do to this day.

Not only are Christian objections ignored by the political class and its attendant army of sycophantic 'progressives' and self loathers, they are actively erasing Christian festivals and symbols from public life in favour of alien ones. 

It is now accepted as inevitable that Muslims will go on a rampage of murder and mayhem if anyone in the civilised world should exercise their right to freedom of expression as the horrific events at the offices of the Charlie Hebdo satirical publication in Paris has demonstrated.

Those government leaders and the other apologists that had the gall to attend a so called Unity March in Paris yesterday have nothing to say when the Prophets, Saints and Saviour of the Christian faith are slandered, demeaned and insulted, sometimes in the vilest possible manner.

The fact that the heads of Martin Scorsese and the Monty Python team remain firmly fixed to their shoulders highlights the fundamental difference between the civilised Judeo-Christian world and the backward, barbaric Muslim world.

This is one of the many reasons that these two fundamentally different worlds are now and always will be incompatible.

The issue of so called moderate Muslims is no longer relevant as their silence and lack of effective action against their co-religionists isn't stopping the bloodshed of innocent people.    

Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom taken for granted in the civilised world and it is one of the corner stones of free, democratic societies. The opposite is true for Islam where the Koran as interpreted by the theocracy is the one and only law where those who refuse to submit must be held in servitude or be killed.

The latest killings around the world culminating in the Charlie Hebdo atrocity has caused the 'political winds to shift in an ugly direction' with people losing their fear of political correctness and taking to the streets in protest at the Islamification of their towns and cities.

It is decision time for the political class who are currently using Islam and Muslims to impose 'multi-culturalism' on their long suffering populations who weren't consulted, didn't ask for it and don't want it.

At least one politician has made plain his attitude when he referred to Arab and Pakistani Americans post 9/11

 “ I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

Audacity of Hope  - B. Hussein Obama

                                           ------------------------------------------------------



To lighten up we'll finish on a funny note, Bigus Dickus from the Life of Brian.

Defeat Radical Islam In The Same Manner As Communism?

Far be it from me to disagree with a retired General from the US military but in my humble opinion even he can get it wrong.

General Keane, a Fox News military analyst, was giving his view on defeating radical Islam on the Happening Now news programme this morning.

Among other things, his presentation contained a historical comparison with World War ll and the more recent defeat of communism.

His assertion that Nazism and Fascism were defeated by military might is correct but his further assertion that communism was defeated by an entirely different non military approach is wrong for two reasons.

a) The massive build up of the US and NATO nuclear capabilities certainly gave the Soviet Union food for thought. It not only put them under immense economic pressure but also drove home the fact that they would lose any confrontation.

b) Looking at the world around us it is abundantly clear that communism is alive and well and far from defeated. In fact it is gaining strength and is as influential today as it was during the height of the Soviet Union.

Like radical Muslims, those dedicated to communism and its false god, Karl Marx, will never ever give up. Therefore they accepted the reality that they could never defeat the free world militarily; they simply changed their clothes and infiltrated their way into the western democracies and subverted them from within.

So successful have they been that there is a communist sympathiser in the White House who has surrounded himself with a like minded administration. State and city governments from California to Massachusetts, Detroit to New York are run on communist lines to the detriment of the people.

So acceptable have communists become in mainstream American life they have come out of the closet and out into the open.

The electorate of New York City recently elected Bill de Blasio, an openly communist candidate as their Mayor. Judging by recent events its a decision they are living to regret already.

The front runners for the Democrat Party Presidential nomination are Hilary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren, two machine politicians who's core beliefs derive from Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto and Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals.

Since the accession of President Obama to power, the descent of the once mighty USA toward third world status is palpable. Once renown for its individual liberty, free enterprise economic system, prosperity, and constitutionally limited government, the 'shining city on a hill' is fast becoming indistinguishable from the East European autocracies of a few decades ago.

The people of France elected socialist ideologue Francois Hollande as their President and by any measure he has been a complete and utter disaster. The warnings that his socialist tax and spend policies would wreck the French economy, just as it has wrecked every economy since statism began, fell on deaf ears.

If Great Britain never recovered from the socialist Labour government of 1947, it will never, ever recover from the socialist disaster of the 1997 government of Tony Blair. This is the man who infamously wrote that "he came to socialism through Marxism" and who is now a multi-millionaire recluse from the disaster he left behind for everyone else to endure.

The current leader of the Labour Party is a born the bred Marxist Ed Miliband. Another machine politician who led the tributes on the death of 'his great family friend' the notorious anti-British historian Eric Hobsbawm. This committed communist excused Stalin's purges claiming that the millions of dead people were a price worth paying for communism.

The latest polling report on 8th January had Labour Party ahead by three points giving Red Ed a Parliamentary majority of 26. That means that Great Britain would join France in having a self declared communist/socialist Premier.

These examples alone should prove that communism is far from defeated but now mainstream in the former free world. One could not however fail to mention the European Union; this is the precursor to the post democratic federal superstate that uses the former Soviet Union as a template.

In shades of their heroes in the Soviet Union and in line with many of the more authoritarian socialist/communist regimes, the EU recently elected their new President, Jean Claude Junker. The Parliament was allowed to vote but Junker was the only candidate who was laughably elected in a secret ballot.

This hopelessly corrupt institution was dreamt up by politicians and bureaucrats for their own benefit and is the Politburo reincarnated. The ruling clique are appointed which makes them unaccountable and unsackable; they also help themselves to shed loads of taxpayer money without shame. Like their Russian comrades, no bureaucrat leaves the EU without a personal fortune despite the fact most are superannuated socialists/communists from the member countries.

In conclusion, contrary to what the General believes, communism is nowhere near to being defeated. Once confined to a few defined countries, it's reach is now global with no continent free from its malign, poverty-inducing influence.

Apart from the more obvious communist/socialist states such as China, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam, Cuba and Venezuela, whole swathes of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Europe are infected to some degree. Unfortunately for those in the world who crave liberty and prosperity it includes their last hope, Great Britain and the United States of America.

Bloodshed - The Price Politicians Will Pay to Impose Multi-Culturalism

The atrocity in Paris carried out by radical Muslims in the name of Allah the Merciful as commanded by their prophet Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him?) and as written in their holy book the Koran, will be forgotten as soon as the news cycle moves on.

This has been the case with previous atrocities such as the London Transport and Madrid train bombings, the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby on a London street, the Nairobi shopping mall massacre etc. Even the murders last month in the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Sydney Australia, which caused outrage and condemnation at the time, is disappearing into the fog of yesterday's news.

Just like night follows day the politicians have been falling over themselves to deliver the standard statements prepared by their spin doctors and media managers expressing their outrage, their sympathy for the families of the victims, together with the usual promise to leave no stone unturned in order to bring the perpetrators to justice.

On horrific occasions such as this they deliberately refrain from using that other standard soundbite of "lessons have been learned" for the simple reason that the lessons have been there for decades but they choose to ignore them for fear of putting their cultural replacement agenda in jeopardy.

The solution to radical Islam and its murderous actions is further away than ever. Whatever promises the politicians and the government-media axis manufacture in the aftermath of the Paris tragedy, nothing will change.

Past experience has shown us that there will be no serious attempt to effectively deal with radical Islam in Great Britain, they will brazen it out until the news cycle moves on then it will be business as usual.

Anyone following the statements and policies of British Prime Minister David Cameron cannot fail to notice that he is totally committed to the European Union together with its requirement to replace British culture and its way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

It's the same with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande and the rest of the European Union leadership. They are committed to the post war project to replace the sovereign nation states of Europe with a post democratic United States of Europe; this includes the creation of a generic European citizen.

A generic European citizen is not possible with twenty seven or so individual cultures and ways of life, therefore they must all be erased and replaced by artificially constructed 'multi-cultural societies'.

Why they have chosen Muslims to be the battering ram for the destruction of the individual cultures is open to speculation but it is indisputable that its been spectacularly effective. The demise of Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands, to name but three, into third world countries dominated by Muslims demanding shariah, is a testament to this fact.

Regardless of their incompatibility, and without consulting the people, the British political class encouraged mass immigration from backward third world Muslim countries knowing full well they would not integrate and adopt the British values or way of life. On the contrary they were actively encouraged not to integrate.

Consequently the country is blighted with thousands of autonomous Muslim ghettos where the Queens writ does not run. Rather, they are ruled by imams and tribal elders under shariah law. These are breeding grounds for the radical jihadis that we see today committing acts of medieval barbarism and depravity across Africa, the Middle East, Europe and the British mainland itself.

The political class were aware that mass immigration alone would not be enough to impose multi-culturalism, therefore it was supplemented by a policy of rigidly policed political correctness and oppressive laws that shutdown debate through intimidation and smear.

To the detriment of the indigenous population, this was further supplemented by selective application of current laws based on ethnicity and cultural requirements.

If one looks back at previous outrages and the lack of effective action by the political class, a clear pattern emerges which proves the point that no action will be taken that would put the imposition of  'multi-culturalism' in jeopardy.

A list of global terrorist outrages can be found here but we only need to highlight a few to prove the point:

The Madrid train bombings in 2004 which killed 191 and wounded 1800. Despite the predictable faux outrage, crocodile tears for the victims and promises to bring the perpetrators to justice, there was no effective action by the British government to prevent a similar outrage being committed in London.

The London Transport bombings in 2005 which killed 53 and injured 700 were carried out by British sons of Pakistani immigrants and a Jamaican convert.

Despite the now familiar spin doctor authored media statement, no action was taken by the British government to prevent further outrages or to prevent the radicalisation of young Muslims. These sub-human savages were born and bred in Great Britain, attended British schools, used the NHS and watched the BBC much like any other British kid.

They were obviously radicalised in a mosque or madrassa within one of the aforementioned ghettos. Anyone who had the safety of the British people as a priority would have a moratorium on immigration from the backward villages of Pakistan and would close down the mosques and madrassas.

The political class does not have the safety of the British people at heart. Imposing multi-culturalism is their number one priority, therefore immigration from Pakistan continues unabated with the construction of mosques and madrassas throughout the land on the increase.

The London Transport bombers in 2005 where, due to incompetence, there were no fatalities or injuries. The bombers were immigrants from Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea and in the case of one, he was granted a British passport despite a record of sexual assault and violent crime.

Immigration from Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea continues unabated and as far as I know the mosques they attended and the imams that preach hate are still in operation.

Finally the horrific 2013 killing of soldier Lee Rigby was carried out on a London street by two sub-humans of Nigerian descent. These were radicalised in British mosques and madrassas and one at least was a disciple of the notorious hate preacher Anjem 'Andy' Choudary.

Immigration from Nigeria also continues unabated and the guilty mosques and madrassas with their imams and hate preachers remain in business. Choudary is still on the streets peddling his hate, even giving tacit support to the Paris gunmen.

In the meantime Paul Weston was arrested for quoting Sir Winston Churchill in public, while two hundred thousand people were prosecuted for the crime of watching television without a licence.


The government has no idea how many British documented jihadis are abroad mutilating and killing innocents as well as honing their terrorist skills in readiness for mayhem and murder on their return 'home'.

It beggars belief that the government is planning to welcome back any jihadi who returns from their beloved Islamic State "with good intentions". It would appear that a diversity course and some kind of community punishment will wipe the slate clean.

The facts are stark and potentially disastrous for the British people. Their government is far more committed to imposing 'multi-culturalism' than protecting them from their most valued client group.
Not only have the politicians been ignoring the warning signs for over a decade, the jihadis have also telegraphed in advance their intention to cause bloodshed in Great Britain to further their aim of extending the caliphate and imposing shariah law.

The British government will pay lip service but they will not take the drastic measures necessary to protect their constituents from Muslim violence. Their dedication to political correctness and imposing an unwanted and unasked for 'multi-cultural society' gives one the impression that they are just as fanatical as the group they go to such lengths to protect.

I would say in conclusion that there is no more a debilitating sight than watching hypocrites like Ban Ki-moon, David Cameron, Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande, the EU bureaucrats and the rest of the sanctimonious purveyors of socialist/progressive, self loathing, multi-culturalism pretending they are part of the Je Suis Charlie movement, when they opposed, intimidated and smeared anyone who raised a voice in dissent of mass immigration, jihad and radical Islam.

The Gettysburg Address - David Cameron Is No Abraham Lincoln

Address delivered at the dedication of the cemetery at Gettysburg.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those here who gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate - we can not hallow - we can not consecrate this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note , nor long remember what we say here, but they can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this nation under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

                                                                                                                                  Abraham Lincoln

November 19. 1863.

Without the top and bottom lines most students from the pre-progressive education era will still recognise this as the Gettysburg Address, delivered by President Abraham Lincoln while consecrating the war cemetery after the battle of Gettysburg during the final stages of the American Civil War.

Most students will not have committed it to memory but they will be familiar with its sentiments, particularly the last line. They will also acknowledge that it was delivered by a man so immense that despite his humble beginnings and demeanor, he strides across history like a colossus.

It is believed that President Lincoln wrote this speech himself on November 18/19 while travelling from Washington DC to Gettysburg. It is also believed that he was seriously ill at the time, suffering from the initial stages of smallpox.

With all this in mind it is worth contrasting Abraham Lincoln, together with this defining moment in history, with the current crop of political leaders as the world created by the fallen from both the New World and the Old, goes to hell in a hand basket.

The catalyst for this article was British Prime Minister David Cameron and his threat to sack any government minister who does not back him over a his proposed EU renegotiation and referendum.

(Since the leaders of the EU, including the Supreme Leader, Angela Merkel, have ruled out any
re-negotiation this is regarded as a cynical election tactic by Cameron) 

It is obviously beyond his comprehension that these ministers are elected to represent their constituents who in ever increasing numbers disagree with Cameron's subservience to the EU bureaucrats. Either this or he believes the views of the people are irrelevant and should be ignored.

Whichever it is "government of the people, by the people, for the people" plays no part in his political philosophy or that of his administration. 

It is worth reminding ourselves that David Cameron is no Abraham Lincoln. There is no log cabin story here or grinding poverty. Nor is there self education, work in the real world or any experience whatsoever of the lives of ordinary people.

David Cameron hails from a remote, wealthy elite who was apparently 'spotted' at university as potential leadership material. Spotted by who and under what criteria remains a mystery.

He is a machine politician created by PR men, advertising executives and image consultants with the sole purpose of fronting the political elite who are committed to imposing their 'progressive' agenda on the British people whether they want it or not.

Unfortunately for the British people, David Cameron couldn't write a lunch order without his army of SpAds (Special Advisers), spin doctors and media management consultants let alone a Gettysburg Address.

While President Lincoln 'dedicated a portion of the battlefield as a final resting place for those who gave their lives that the nation may live', David Cameron attends the Remembrance ceremony at the Cenotaph knowing he is surrendering the sovereignty that our Glorious Dead sacrificed their lives to preserve.

At the same time he is dismantling the once mighty British military machine in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force thus consigning a major part of Great Britain's glorious past to history.

To add insult to injury he attended the Remembrance ceremony in the company of five of Great Britain's most notorious collaborators. This group of people are committed to the destruction of a sovereign Great Britain in favour of a post democratic federal super state.

These six political collaborators have done more to damage Great Britain's independence and sovereignty than Hitler's bombs ever did. In line with the demands of EU membership they have set about deliberately destroying British culture and its way of life for a mythical 'multi-cultural society'.

This willful destruction is social engineering on a massive scale designed to replace the cultures and ways of life of the individual nation states with a generic non-European citizen.

On the left is Gordon Brown, a Scottish socialist and misanthropist who harbours a particular loathing for the English people. Apart from his economic incompetence which broke the nation's finances, he signed the Lisbon Treaty breaking a specific promise to give the people a referendum first.

Next is Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed. He took over the leadership of the Labour Party after Brown's ejection from power. A first generation immigrant, he is a born and bred Marxist who is committed to the replacement of a sovereign Great Britain with a communist run United States of Europe. In line with his creed, he is opposed to the British people having a referendum on their future.

Next is the infamous Tony Blair, another Scotsman and committed Europhile. A growing number of British people consider Blair to be a war criminal for taking Great Britain into an illegal war with Iraq which cost hundreds of thousands of lives.

The refusal of the government, both British and American, to release the findings of the Chilcott inquiry into the Iraq war is considered by many to be the political establishment looking after one of its own.

Then comes Nick Clegg. The leader of the ridiculously named Liberal Democrat party is another Great Britain hating first generation immigrant who's dedication to the United States of Europe is legendary. Clegg also believes that the British people should not have a say on EU membership via a referendum.

Next to Clegg is former Prime Minister John  Major, a committed Europhile who signed the Maastricht Treaty. This more than any other treaty effectively ended Great Britain as an independent country thus giving away what Our Glorious Dead made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve. He did this without consulting the people first or giving them a referendum.

On the right is Cameron, the current leader of the movement dedicated to the replacement of the independent nation states of Europe with a post democratic federal super state.

The appearance of these politicians at the Cenotaph desecrates the monument and makes a mockery of the Remembrance ceremony.

It is worth noting that it's impossible to differentiate between the malign intentions of these six British politicians with those of the Norwegian politician and traitor Vidkun Quisling. Like Quisling they are surrendering their country to foreign rule to the detriment of the people they are supposed to be representing.

I would add in conclusion that there is one particular British politician that ranks alongside Abraham Lincoln in the annals of history and he had something to say about Quislings and those that tried to destroy the nation states of Europe.

Watch the must see video here.