Tuesday, October 30, 2018

The Enemies of Nation States and Secure Borders

One of the most enjoyable consequences of candidate Trump’s election to the US Presidency is watching the hysterical reaction of America hating ‘progressives’ at home and abroad. 

It’s a wonder to behold how this businessman turned politician can carry on with his ‘putting America first’ agenda in the face of a twenty-four-hour assault by the mainstream media as directed by his enemies in Congress, its establishment and the deep state.

It’s not only his enemies at home that are gnashing their teeth with frustration and anger. The globalist ‘one world’ fanatics at the United Nations and the European Union are experiencing a similar apoplectic meltdown as he dismantles their plan for a borderless world.

Their apoplexy is compounded by the British people voting to leave the European Union in the Brexit referendum and take back control of their country and their borders. As recent elections have shown, this has emboldened other members of the EU to embrace nation state democracy and take back their sovereignty and with it control of their borders.  

The ideology of the ruling elite that run the supranational institutions is deeply embedded in their subconscious. This renders them incapable or unwilling to understand the desire of individuals to live their lives in liberty, free from oppressive, remote governments. They also cannot understand an individuals’ love of their country, their culture and their way of life.

When one listens and reads what these supranational leaders have to say about borders and mass immigration it puts the migrant caravan that is currently on its way to assault the borders of the United States into perspective.

They also highlight the perverted logic they use to justify mass immigration into Europe while ignoring the disastrous consequences this has had on the people of the host nations.

The Secretary-General of the United Nations, Antonio Gutterez, is a rabid socialist who believes that ‘migration is not the problem but the solution’. His contempt for people and democracy was on full display when he went on to say that politicians should ignore the voters by urging them to prioritize ‘’values’ over voters’ wishes.

Speaking like a true globalist believer he also stated that the idea that management of migration is a matter of national sovereignty is extremely limited. This is because of people smugglers but he goes on to say that regardless of these criminals, mass migration is inevitable and will not stop.

Disregarding the fact that in the Netherlands, for example, sixty-five percent of the non-European migrants that arrived in the 1990’s are still living on welfare, Gutterez contradicted himself by stating that “we must convince Europeans that migration is inevitable and that it is the multi-ethnic societies which are multi-cultural and multi-religious who are building wealth”. 

Across the Atlantic the President of the European Commission, which serves as the Executive Branch of the supranational European Union, is even more blunt when it comes to nation states and secure borders.

Speaking at a European Forum in Austria, the globalist fanatic, Jean-Claude Junker, called upon Europe to show solidarity with refugees, ignoring the fact that the overwhelming majority are economic migrants not refugees.

We have to fight against nationalism” Junker declared and went on to say that “borders are the worst invention ever by politicians… In the concentration of globalization and European problems we must not lose our way”.

Gutterez and Junker are moderate compared to Frans Timmermans the Vice-President of the European Commission and probably the biggest open borders fanatic of them all. This powerful politician is Nazi-like in his fanaticism for a borderless world. Despite this he is highly respected among the supranational ruling elite and is feted around the world as if he were the oracle from classical antiquity.

Europe must accept diversity or face war” this madman declares before he goes off on a rant that should dispel once and for all any idea that the European Union and the UN are benign organizations that have the best interests of humankind at heart.

In shades of the Third Reich he urged the European Union Parliament to increase its efforts to “erase single mono-cultural nation states” and accelerate the process in which “every single nation on earth must eventually become diverse”.

If that isn’t scary enough he stressed the importance of “not allowing even the remotest places on the planet to exist without diversity”.

For those Americans and Europeans who believe that open borders are compassionate, along with those who want to welcome the caravan from Central America, read what this fanatic has to say and be warned:

The future of humanity, so he says, no longer belongs to individual nations and cultures, but rather a mixed super-culture. Contemporary conservatives, who value their own traditions and want a peaceful future for their own communities, value a "past that never existed" and can therefore not dictate the future. Timmermans therefore implies that European culture and heritage are nothing but social constructs and anybody who says otherwise is narrow-minded. He concludes his speech by stating that Europe has always been a continent of migrants and European values inherently mean accepting diversity.

He expresses concerns that if the EU does not increase efforts to ensure that diversity gets to every single spot on Earth as fast as possible, the peace in Europe will be at stake.

The means to achieve this are, of course, large scale, illegal mass immigration of Muslim men into Europe; the efforts to "ensure no country can escape from inevitable diversity" imply forcing immigrants onto the very last, I quote, "remotest places on the Planet" to ensure that there are no homogeneous societies left anywhere.

It is very unusual to hear a EU politician speak his intentions so clearly.
It appears that he no longer feels the need to hide the fact that "diversity" means nothing less than chasing down the last remaining Europeans on Earth and flooding their neighborhoods with foreigners.

If this man were an authentic ethnopluralist and his intention would be true diversity, he would support the protection of every people in their own respective cultures rather than flooding Europe with hostile immigrants, because right now birth rates are so low and immigration levels so high that the very existence of all European peoples is at stake.

An excellent associated article here:

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Look at Europe - The Road to Hell Is Littered with Migrant Caravans

The idea that thousands of third world peasants from various Central American countries spontaneously decided to walk some 1,500 miles crossing the entire length of Mexico to enter the United States is beyond risible.

Enemies of the United States both foreign and domestic, have spent months organizing this sham and are busy micro-managing this assault on America’s borders as a continuation of the long planned fundamental transformation of America.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that the stated aim of the ruling elite at home in America and abroad at the United Nations is to create a centrally controlled, borderless, egalitarian world which is an impossibility while the traditional United States exists in its present form.

The prosperity of the United States is due to its system of individual liberty inside a capitalist economic system underpinned by constitutionally limited government. This is in stark contrast to the poverty and misery of the surrounding nations and other nations around the world that suffer under socialist/communist systems of government.

A prosperous United States will always show up the failings of the world the global elite are trying to create and subsequently will always be a beacon of freedom to the poor and oppressed and the destination of choice for those trying to escape for a better life.

One does not see desperately poor people risking everything, including their lives, to leave the United States in search of prosperity in any of the surrounding socialist/communist countries or similarly governed countries around the world.

Also, one never sees those high-profile wealthy celebrities who threaten to leave the United States because they disapprove of its leadership cross the borders and actually leave despite being surrounded by countries with economic systems more to their liking and which they advocate.

Estimates vary that there are between ten and twenty million illegal aliens already in the United States so one would think that a few thousand third world peasants aren’t going to make a difference. Should they succeed and be allowed entry the repercussions will be far reaching and devastating.

Without immigration reform the precedent would make America’s borders redundant and therefore encourage further caravans, not only from neighboring countries, but from around the world. The trickle will become a deluge.

Once regularized with documentation, their path to citizenship would have to be extended to the millions of other illegal aliens already in residence altering the demographic balance and thereby guaranteeing power to the globalist elite in perpetuity.

The Constitution that has enshrined liberty and justice for all will be torn up and the citizens disarmed opening the door to a tyranny that cannot be peacefully removed.

In a paid private speech to multi-national bankers Hillary Clinton, then Secretary of State and renowned America hating globalist, declared that she wanted to see a ‘common market with open trade and open borders’ in the western hemisphere.

For a glimpse of this nightmare scenario one must only look at the utter destruction that open borders and migrant caravans have visited upon the nation states of Europe and the hell that their people are having to endure without end.

The ‘common market’ for the western hemisphere envisioned by Hillary Clinton with its open borders and free movement of people will trigger migration caravans on a biblical scale. This will result in the destruction of the United States of America and the torch of liberty, justice and prosperity, which is the inspiration for those fighting poverty and oppression around the world, will be extinguished and all hope lost.


Monday, October 22, 2018

Trump v May – Honesty and Integrity v Betrayal and Treachery

It should be obvious even to the most biased observer that President Trump is a patriot and a man of his word. Since he was sworn into office he is keeping the promises he made during his election campaign.

In contrast it should also be obvious to the same observers that British Prime Minister, Theresa May, is a treacherous lying rat who is working with other treacherous lying rats to overturn the result of the Brexit referendum and keep the British people locked inside the hopelessly corrupt and failing European Union (EU).

Candidate Trump made it abundantly clear during his election campaign that America’s trade deals around the world were poorly negotiated, grossly unfair and put America and the American worker at a disadvantage. Consequently, America suffered huge trade deficits with hundreds of thousands of jobs lost to overseas competitors.

In his campaign to put America first he promised to renegotiate these trade deals or pull out of them altogether and use tariffs to encourage recalcitrant nations to the negotiating table.

In less than twenty months in office President Trump has pulled out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) which disadvantaged America and American workers. He has renegotiated trade deals with Japan and Korea along with the disastrous North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada. He is currently renegotiating trade deals with China and the European Union (EU) and who would bet against him succeeding.

Contrast this with British Prime Minister Theresa May. She has been a politician for three decades, including Prime Minister for twenty-seven months, and six years as Home Secretary. Despite this she has failed to negotiate a trade deal with the European Union (EU) when Great Britain is scheduled leave its clutches on the 29th March 2019.

In a similar situation to the United States, Great Britain has a huge 60 billion trade deficit with the EU to which it pays 13.1 billion of taxpayers money per year in contributions for the dubious privilege.

European manufacturers, and millions of jobs, rely heavily on the British market to survive and some 3 million European citizens currently reside in Great Britain.

Along with the biggest mandate in British electoral history, this gives Mrs. May and her negotiating team enormous leverage to secure a trade deal which is advantageous to Great Britain and the British worker.

Despite this enormous leverage, over two years after the British people voted for Brexit there is no sign of a trade deal. To the frustration of everyone, including those who voted to remain, Prime Minister May has allowed the EU bureaucrats to dominate the leaving process to the point where there is no meaningful negotiation at all.

The entire circus is nothing more than a series of demands by the EU to which Mrs. May concedes including crossing the so-called ‘red lines’ which she swore by all that was holy were non-negotiable.

If the dominance of the EU and their total control of the leaving process was the result of Mrs. May’s incompetence her party would have removed her long ago and replaced her with someone better qualified to secure a deal, but it is not. Far from it.

Mrs. May is a life-long Europhile who is committed to the EU project of replacing the independent nation states of Europe with a single federal superstate. She campaigned for Great Britain to remain in the EU during the Brexit referendum campaign.

Since her installation as Prime Minister she has done everything in her power to frustrate the leaving process by using lies, duplicity and underhanded tactics including undermining her own Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davies who promptly resigned when her duplicity became obvious.

Unlike President Trump, Prime Minister May repeatedly made promises she had no intention of keeping, including the supposedly non-negotiable ‘red lines’.

The enormity of her deception beggar’s belief. She has repeatedly promised that Great Britain will be leaving the EU after the two-year Article 50 period has expired on 29th March 2019.
Mrs. May has promised on a myriad of occasions that this means leaving the EU single market, leaving the customs union and leaving the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In turn this means taking back control of Great Britain’s borders, trade policy, money, fishing grounds and an end to the hated free movement of people. These make up the core of the non-negotiable red lines.

While Secretary of State Davies was negotiating in good faith, Mrs. May appointed her personal advisor and career bureaucrat Ollie Robbins along with a cabal of unelected civil servants to negotiate with the EU below the radar to come up with an agreement that keeps Great Britain attached to the EU institutions. 

This agreement not only breaks the red lines but also her solemn promise to leave the EU and all its institutions. This  is the notorious and thoroughly discredited Chequers Plan which she is attempting to bounce the British people into accepting. 

In this plan the single market continues as the ‘common rule book’ which also allows continued jurisdiction of the ECJ. The customs union becomes ‘the facilitated customs agreement’, free movement of people becomes ‘the mobility framework’. Taking back control of the fishing grounds is replaced by ‘a committee to explore common fishing opportunities.

Although Mrs. May claims Great Britain will leave the EU on March 29th 2019 she has agreed a flexible two-year implementation or ‘transition period’ whereby Great Britain will have left the EU but remain attached to the EU institutions and forced to follow its rules and regulations. These will continue to be in force and along with a 39 billion divorce settlement the British taxpayer will continue to handover billions more to the corrupt bureaucrats up until March 2021.

This is the "Brexit-in-name-only" that the British people were warned about the moment the Europhile Theresa May was appointed as Prime Minister.

As predicted at the time, Mrs. May would announce at some point that this so-called ‘transition period’ would need to be extended and sure enough this duplicitous lying reptile has agreed to an extension beyond 2021 which leaves more time for the democracy denying Europhiles to organize the overturn of the referendum result.

In conclusion, while it has taken President Trump less than two years to renegotiate trade deals with some of the largest economies on the planet, Prime Minister Theresa May’s treachery will have ensured the British people will effectively still be members of the European Union some six years after voting to leave.