Showing posts with label Globalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Globalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

President Trump and Brexit Are Threatening the Axis of Evil





One of the notable consequences of the election of President Trump in the USA and the decision of the British people to leave the European Union is the emergence of the borderless one world globalists from the dark recesses of government from which they operate.

The epicenters of the organization who’s dedicated mission is to destroy the independent nation states of the world are the United Nations in New York and its bastard offspring in Brussels, the European Union.  

Nationalism and sovereignty are two words that are striking fear into heart of every globalist who has spent their entire career eating away at the body politic and borders of independent nation states from their UN/EU headquarters.

These two words took on an added potency when they were uttered with absolute conviction by President Trump when he addressed the UN Assembly. As a staunch believer in nation state democracy he made it abundantly clear that he will put his country and his people first and maintain its status as an independent, sovereign nation in perpetuity.

His words were perfect and brought cheer to heart of every patriot and lover of liberty but must have struck like a stake through the heart of every globalist worldwide.

“Each of us here today is the emissary of a distinct culture, the rich history, and a people bound together by ties of memory, tradition, and the values that make our homelands like nowhere else on earth,” he said.
He continued: “That is why America will always choose independence and cooperation over global governments, control and domination. I honor the right of every nation in this room to pursue its own customs, beliefs, and traditions. The United States will not tell you how to live or work or worship. We only ask that you honor our sovereignty in return.”
Later, he added that "America is governed by Americans" and rejects "the ideology of globalism." 

Ouch! This has got to hurt if you are a dedicated globalist who knows in their heart that their one world dream will not work if America remains independent, sovereign and prosperous.
(President Trump speaks at the UN here)
Since the globalist have spent five decades surreptitiously transferring sovereignty to their supranational organizations through Treaties, Compacts and Diktats, President Trump and Brexit have provoked a near hysterical reaction as their dream of a borderless, centrally controlled world hits the buffers.

Led by the fanatical globalist and mentally unstable German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the calls for the transfer of sovereignty to be speeded up are deafening.

At the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin, Mad Merkel spoke loud and clear that nation states today must be prepared to give up their sovereignty. (See here)

At the same venue she elaborated on her statement by stating that nation states must give up sovereignty to the New World Order. (See here)

And to warm the cockles of every patriots’ heart Mad Merkel complained that Trump is destroying her beloved UN by cutting ties with some its more profligate and useless agencies. This commentator, and I’m sure many others, hope he is successful and this particular axis of evil is utterly destroyed.


Spare a few minutes to watch and enjoy Mad Merkel whining about President Trump’s battle against globalism here.

In an outburst of globalist fervour Merkel attacks nationalism and claims that only UN values and cooperation pave a new future. (See here)

Mad Merkel's lapdog, Emmanuel Macron of France, backs up his master's lunacy by claiming that Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism. (See here)



Another consequence of the Trump election and the Brexit vote is that the totalitarianism that lies at the heart of the globalists has been revealed. As the President's administration and Brexit continue apace, the attempts to overthrow both are gaining momentum.

The globalists involved in these attempts are powerful, well organised and well financed and they would rather see America and Great Britain fail and fall into destitution than Trump and Brexit succeed without them. 

Whether they succeed or not remains to be seen but if they do the future for peace and democracy are very bleak indeed.  

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Look at Europe - The Road to Hell Is Littered with Migrant Caravans






The idea that thousands of third world peasants from various Central American countries spontaneously decided to walk some 1,500 miles crossing the entire length of Mexico to enter the United States is beyond risible.

Enemies of the United States both foreign and domestic, have spent months organizing this sham and are busy micro-managing this assault on America’s borders as a continuation of the long planned fundamental transformation of America.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that the stated aim of the ruling elite at home in America and abroad at the United Nations is to create a centrally controlled, borderless, egalitarian world which is an impossibility while the traditional United States exists in its present form.

The prosperity of the United States is due to its system of individual liberty inside a capitalist economic system underpinned by constitutionally limited government. This is in stark contrast to the poverty and misery of the surrounding nations and other nations around the world that suffer under socialist/communist systems of government.

A prosperous United States will always show up the failings of the world the global elite are trying to create and subsequently will always be a beacon of freedom to the poor and oppressed and the destination of choice for those trying to escape for a better life.

One does not see desperately poor people risking everything, including their lives, to leave the United States in search of prosperity in any of the surrounding socialist/communist countries or similarly governed countries around the world.

Also, one never sees those high-profile wealthy celebrities who threaten to leave the United States because they disapprove of its leadership cross the borders and actually leave despite being surrounded by countries with economic systems more to their liking and which they advocate.


Estimates vary that there are between ten and twenty million illegal aliens already in the United States so one would think that a few thousand third world peasants aren’t going to make a difference. Should they succeed and be allowed entry the repercussions will be far reaching and devastating.

Without immigration reform the precedent would make America’s borders redundant and therefore encourage further caravans, not only from neighboring countries, but from around the world. The trickle will become a deluge.

Once regularized with documentation, their path to citizenship would have to be extended to the millions of other illegal aliens already in residence altering the demographic balance and thereby guaranteeing power to the globalist elite in perpetuity.

The Constitution that has enshrined liberty and justice for all will be torn up and the citizens disarmed opening the door to a tyranny that cannot be peacefully removed.

In a paid private speech to multi-national bankers Hillary Clinton, then Secretary of State and renowned America hating globalist, declared that she wanted to see a ‘common market with open trade and open borders’ in the western hemisphere.

For a glimpse of this nightmare scenario one must only look at the utter destruction that open borders and migrant caravans have visited upon the nation states of Europe and the hell that their people are having to endure without end.

The ‘common market’ for the western hemisphere envisioned by Hillary Clinton with its open borders and free movement of people will trigger migration caravans on a biblical scale. This will result in the destruction of the United States of America and the torch of liberty, justice and prosperity, which is the inspiration for those fighting poverty and oppression around the world, will be extinguished and all hope lost.

  

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Eastern Europeans And Italians Join The Anti-EU Revolution





To the consternation of the UN/EU globalists, opposition to the economic, cultural and demographic disaster that has been wreaked upon the people of Europe is at last gaining traction across the continent.

Discontent has been building for decades as the people of Europe were being systematically impoverished by socialist policies and the unsustainable influx of economic colonists. 

Worse than this is the fact that innocent people are being raped, mutilated and murdered by Islamic jihadists who have been invited in by the agenda driven ruling class to facilitate their Islamization program.

This discontent has been made infinitely worse by the ruling elite shutting down any opposition using censorship, demonization and threats of prosecution for anyone voicing dissenting opinions.

In addition to this, democratic elections, and referenda, when they are allowed, are either weighted or the results ignored if the people vote ‘the wrong way’.

The anti-EU revolution started from small beginnings with political dissidents such as Gert Wilders in the Netherlands, Marine Le Penn in France and the inimitable Nigel Farage in Great Britain battling against the globalist establishment. 

Labeled as ‘far-right’, these three in particular have suffered abuse, demonization, vilification and smear in addition to death threats.

To the horror of the ruling EU autocrats, defiance and opposition to their diktats has spread to the Eastern European members with the normally subservient Italians joining the uprising.





Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Czech Republic are refusing to obey the EU diktats especially when it comes to opening their borders to mass immigration. They are also refusing to accept quotas from the phony ‘refugee crisis’ which was deliberately manufactured by the clearly insane German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.




Horror of all horrors, they are also refusing to accept any Muslim colonists in order to protect their people and their cultures from the demographic and Islamization disaster that has engulfed the rest of the EU.

This brazen defiance, especially on immigration and Islamization, has angered the autocrats because the core of the EU project is a single, borderless, multi-cultural state centrally governed from Brussels in a post democratic age.

Citing so-called 'EU solidarity', the autocrats demand that national governments implement EU diktats without question or opposition. Refusal to obey will attract sanctions which can include financial penalties, and in the case of Poland, the removal of voting rights in EU institutions.

The success of the Brexit referendum and the election of President Trump in the USA has emboldened dissidents across the EU and demonstrated that the will of the people can prevail against overwhelming odds.

In conclusion, it is hoped by all freedom loving people who believe in the sanctity and sovereignty of independent nation states that the momentum of the rebellion will gather pace and eventually destroy the malignant cancer that is the European Union and return government of the people, by the people, for the people to this blighted continent.

Related articles:


Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Putin Takes Control - American Global Influence Evaporates

On this day when the American people remember the tragic loss of their fellow citizens in the World Trade Centre atrocity, it is worth reminding ourselves that this is also the anniversary of the Benghazi atrocity where sections of the Muslim world celebrated their victory over the Great Satan on the 11th September 2001. These two atrocities came about as a result of the erosion of American power and influence over several decades and particularly during the last six years.

Those of us who support the informed American people in their fight to prevent a European type descent into third world mediocrity, the performance of their President and his acolytes in recent weeks will be depressingly familiar.

There was a hope that the USA, with its dedication to individual liberty, free enterprise and constitutionally limited government, would remain that shining city on a hill as Great Britain and the Anglosphere fell victim to the global 'progressive' agenda.  That turned out to be a case of false optimism.

Like their counterparts in the rest of the Anglosphere, the American people allowed themselves to be manipulated by unscrupulous, agenda driven political elitists in pursuit of political power. They were seduced by the slick advertising campaigns of the professional PR men to such a ridiculous extent that they elected a man solely on the basis of his half white skin colour, his telegenic persona and his ability to read pre-written speeches off a teleprompter.

As the British people did with their media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, they totally ignored his lack of history, experience, achievements and his lack of connections with real people in the real world.  It didn't seem to bother the American people when it was revealed that candidate Obama was steeped in Marxist ideology, anti-white racial politics and anti-American radical socialism.

When candidate Obama stood in front of his fake Greek columns and stated to the world that he was "five days away from fundamentally transforming America", what on God's earth did the American people think he meant? They were obviously not watching the disastrous descent of the great European nations into bankruptcy, poverty and third world mediocrity which was the result of the imposed 'progressive' agenda that would shortly be imposed on them.

What we are witnessing today during the Syrian crisis is the result of America's descent into mediocrity because of the imposition of that same 'progressive' agenda; this slow evaporation of American influence did not go unnoticed in the Kremlin, Beijing or the caves of Tora Bora.

President Obama's performance at the recent G20 summit was abysmal and an embarrassment for the American people; it highlighted the world of difference between a worldly wise, experienced political operator, albeit a KGB thug, and an inexperienced, media created fake who's only experience is in community organizing.

When one looks back into recent history, it is unimaginable to think that a tinpot dictator from a nonentity of a country like Syria can cause so much grief and humiliation for an American President.

One has to ask what would Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bushes 1 and 2 have done in the case of Syria? Conversely, what would President Obama have done had he been faced with the Cuban missile crisis, the nuclear armed Mad Dog Gaddafi or the invasion of Kuwait by a tyrant like Saddam Hussein?

It must be remembered that on the brink of nuclear war, President Kennedy stood nose to nose with Nikita Khrushchev, a ruthless, dedicated communist, and refused to budge an inch, forcing a humiliating climb down by this political fanatic.

It must also be remembered that Ronald Reagan stood nose to nose with seasoned Russian cold warriors Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov (who like Putin was leader of the KGB) and Mikhail Gorbachev, resulting in the defeat of communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe.

For years Colonel Gaddafi had sponsored terrorist organisations around the world, from the Palestinians and the Irish Republican Army to Carlos the Jackal and the Red Army Factions. After several warnings from President Reagan and a few strategically placed cruise missiles, including on several of his homes, Gaddafi retreated to his Bedouin tent not to be heard of again until his demise at the hands of own his people.

This kind of influence and respect has all but evaporated and it is not difficult to understand why.

Like Great Britain and Europe, the priorities of the American 'progressive' elite changed from economic strength and the interests of their own people to:

State mandated equality and fairness, including equality of nations and cultural relativity.

Redistribution of wealth.

Expanding government and welfare entitlements.

Replacing individual liberty with so called collective responsibility.

Gender neutrality and sexuality politics.

Downgrading the military and much more.

One has to bear in mind that there are fifty Muslim countries on the planet with a population approaching two billion souls, which is almost twenty four percent of the world's population. It cannot be difficult to understand that these religious orientated people are repulsed by the obsession with secular Marxist equality together with the homosexual agenda.

What must they be thinking about the West's obsession with homosexuals and especially David Cameron's vow to send his team around the world to encourage all governments to legislate for gay marriage?

President Obama's lack of experience or leadership skills becomes glaringly apparent by watching his performance during the Syrian debacle. He has surrounded himself with like minded agenda driven fanatics such as Hillary Clinton and now the appalling John Kerry. They are like rabbits caught in the headlight of a child's tricycle. They simply do not know what to do.

In an attempt to emulate Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bush x 2, President Obama comes over all macho by making his infamous 'red line' threat over chemical weapons to the worlds media. He  looked as macho as a kitten when his bluff is called by Bashar al Assad and he failed to act.

In a cringe making attempt to save face, which only served to make him a bigger laughing stock than he already is, his red line suddenly becomes the world's red line. This is dismal and a pathetic attempt to absolve himself from blame.

The President, who doesn't think twice about using executive power to bypass Congress, tries to offload responsibility by demanding they vote on military action, which by his own account he doesn't need.

President Putin, who is wallowing in Obama's obvious lack of leadership and subsequent discomfort, rubs his nose further in the dirt by offering the life line of a negotiation which Obama gratefully accepts and asks Congress to delay their vote.

The world is watching as Putin's Russia replaces Obama's America as the power broker and main influence in Middle Eastern politics. To the dismay of freedom lovers around the world, the rookie is giving the so called master a lesson in global foreign policy.

In conclusion it's worth taking stock of the change in global influence since the western world committed Hari Kari by adopting the 'progressive' agenda.

The British and Europeans have been ousted from sub Saharan Africa by the resource hungry Chinese. The rest of Africa is dominated by the Muslim world from Egypt to Mali. As we have seen, the Middle East is becoming increasingly dominated by Russia and radical Islamic factions, including the supposedly defeated Al Qaeda.

Central and southern Asia, including India, is influenced by Russia with China dominating the Far East. The former western ally, Japan, dropped off the radar decades ago. Indonesia and the Pacific are increasingly being influenced by radical Islam.

Central and South America are dominated by socialist regimes who's political ideologies stem from Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara and Simon Bolivar.

Great Britain, Europe, the United States and the Anglosphere in general have rotted from the inside out and are now reduced to bystanders in an increasing hostile world. The descent into third world mediocrity is unlikely to slow down while 'progressives' such as Obama, Cameron, and the EU bureaucrats remain in control.

All is not lost however and freedom loving people of the world should take heart; there is one tiny glimmer of light in this dark nightmare of destruction. The Australian people have demonstrated that with resolve and leaders armed with the right policies they can consign the 'progressive' destroyers to the dustbin of history where they belong.

Update: Putin lectures America in the New York Times




Thursday, February 7, 2013

Same Sex Marriage Part II - The 'Progressive' Agenda Advances

As the repercussions of the same sex marriage vote in the British Parliament continue to reverberate around the world, the question on everyone's lips is, why did PM David Cameron push this through against the wishes of the majority of his own MP's, against the wishes of the majority of his party members, against the wishes of all the religious groups and most importantly of all, against the wishes of the majority of the British people?

Cameron's friend and fellow remote metropolitan elitist, George Osbourne, must know something the rest of us don't when it comes to election strategy. As Cameron's election strategist Osbourne is either blind, stupid or a combination of both.

Statistics and polls on the repercussions of this lunacy were abundant and they were known in advance by the Cameron/Osbourne strategy team. These included the views of the homosexual community itself. ( The population percentage of homosexuals in the UK varies between 1.5% and 4.2%. Some surveys have it as high as 9% )

An earlier ComRes poll indicated that the marriage issue was not a priority for the majority of homosexuals, less than half said the opportunity to get married was important, only 27% said they would avail themselves of the opportunity to get married. That's 27% of 4.2% of the population.

The majority of the homosexual community claimed that Cameron was using this issue to make his party look compassionate and as a means of boosting his own image. One has to ask the question, boosting his image with who?

The same poll claimed that 70% of the British people agreed with the Church that the definition of marriage should be left alone.

Statistics and polls could be inaccurate or interpreted as the reader pleases but actions speak louder than statistics and it has been reported that membership of the Conservative Party has dropped from around 250,000 when Cameron became leader to 150,000 today.

Cameron's own MP's are predicting that after this vote, 10% of the remaining number will lost this week alone.

As these repercussions were known in advance and coupled with the fact that Cameron is attacking his own MP's as bigots and out of touch, it would appear that he is deliberately trying to destroy his own party. He is finishing the job that Moscow and the Labour Party started at the end of World War II.

The truth is that representative politics and the very nature of democracy itself, has been changing for the worse in Great Britain and the world at large since the end of WW II.

Traditionally, politicians were chosen from the community, by the community, to represent the community. These have been replaced by career politicians who are chosen or approved by remote party machines to impose their particular agenda on the people whether the people agree to it or not.

These new career politicians have no experience in the real world of their constituents nor can they identify with their lives or issues.

They are incapable of independent thought and can only speak in slogans and soundbites which are given to them by the party whips at the start of each day.

They have been trained in media skills, at taxpayer expense, not to speak the truth but to repeat the soundbites and push the party line at every opportunity.

Advances in technology have enabled politicians from all countries to meet and communicate on a regular basis allowing those with a similar ideology to act globally and with the advent of the United Nations the global 'progressive' movement was born.

It is with this movement that David Cameron is boosting his image with not the British people or the Conservative Party. The other two party idiots, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband signed up years ago.

The British people are not alone.

With the re-election of the Progressive in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, the last obstacle to the global 'progressive agenda, as been removed and they are all on a roll.

The ending of traditional marriage is high on the 'progressive' agenda thus homosexual marriage is being pushed in all parts of the globe against the wishes of the people.

The Progressive in Chief even mentioned homosexual marriage in his recent inauguration speech so he means business.

In California a politically activist judge overturned the result of a democratic ballot which opposed homosexual marriage. The Progressive in Chief and his Attorney General, Eric Holder have indicated they will ignore their own countries' laws when it comes to the Defence of Marriage Act.

With the passing of this Bill in the British Parliament the 'progressive' transformation agenda advances a little further, both in Great Britain and the rest of the developed world.

The British people should pay attention to the of the actions of their representatives and ask themselves whether these actions are in their interests or to advance a different agenda.

David  'Call me Dave' Cameron has labelled himself as a 'progressive' conservative and the heir to Blair but by his actions against the British people over the European Union and traditional marriage, he has demonstrated that his loyalty is with his fellow 'progressive' politicians in a new transformed world.

*Update: Why is it that Call Me Dave and his 'progressive' elite want to abolish traditional marriage and the family?  Nick Clegg and his party of liars and cheats claim that as an institution it is out of date.

If that's the case then why didn't they say so at election time instead of parading their families before the media while simultaneously cheating on their wives and children as per Chris Huhne and that pinnacle of foulness Mark Oaten and others.

As far as Red Ed Miliband and his crew of communist sympathisers are concerned its an ideological requirement that is written in their sacred text.

"The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property.."

"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists."

"The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its compliment vanishes and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital".

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by action of Modern Industry.."

The Communist Manifesto (section 2) - Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels