Segregation - Ethnic Communities Demand The Return Of Apartheid

Warnings that imported ethnic communities in Great Britain and America would eventually demand separate, self governing  areas were not only ignored by the advocates of 'multi-culturalism', they also saw fit to demonise, smear and vilify the messengers.

It's worth noting that the same people who are currently caving in to the demands for segregation in Great Britain and America were the most outspoken when it came to apartheid in Southern Africa.

When one looks back at recent history it's hard to find a political cause that was as widely supported and celebrity patronised than the Anti-Apartheid movement of the sixties, seventies and eighties.

Ignoring his well recorded past as a communist, a terrorist and a wife beater, Princes, politicians and publicity seeking pop stars alike joined the undignified scramble for the ultimate photo opportunity with the adopted symbol of their cause, Nelson Mandela.
(It would appear that the policy of not negotiating with terrorists has its exceptions when one assumes moral superiority with respect to civil conflict but I digress)

In order to understand the scale of the hypocrisy concerning modern day segregation a very brief recap of history would be apt.

Bringing to an end white rule in Africa was the priority for the global elites who committed themselves to re-ordering the post war world. This re-ordered world was to be based on equality of nations and people regardless of ethnicity, culture or religion.

Imposing an integrated, multi-cultural, borderless world, governed by themselves of course, where inequality is removed as a cause of conflict was - and still is - their ultimate goal.

This is all very Utopian but the inconvenient truth is that some nations, religions, ethnic groups and cultures are more advanced than others and as a consequence they will be more prosperous and therefore unequal.

To overcome this and impose equality, a program of de-civilisation was instigated using mass immigration from the third world into the developed world combined with a media campaign to smear anyone who objected. With the connivance of the current leaders of the civilised world, along with the the UN/EU, this process is on-going to this day with visibly disastrous consequences.

To the world leaders of the day, buoyed up by cynical opportunists and unscrupulous celebrities who jumped aboard the anti-apartheid bandwagon, the policy of white imposed separate development was more than abhorrent, it was the epitome of all evil.

Interminable UN resolutions combined with campaigns of civil disobedience, sporting boycotts, sanctions, disinvestment and much more were employed to end segregation and impose a so called "multi-cultural rainbow nation".

To the chagrin of the anti-apartheid movement and the sanctimonious advocates of a mythical integrated 'multi-cultural society', the ending of white rule in South Africa has been a violent, blood drenched disaster for all ethnicities, religions and cultures. This proves beyond doubt that the ideal of ending white rule took priority over the wellbeing of the South African people.

Also, to their chagrin, it is not white people who are refusing to integrate into their 'multi-cultural societies' and who are agitating for segregation, it is the different ethnic groups, religions and cultures that are flooding into the developed world in their millions determined to, encouraged even, to remain culturally isolated.

The high profile ant-apartheid movement that agitated for decades to end segregation in South Africa is conspicuous by its absence as Great Britain and America are carved up along ethnic/religious/cultural lines.

Where once there was a noisy reception for anyone associated with segregation or the South African regime there is only a deafening silence.

In England there are calls for black only schools because cultural incompatibility is causing a disparity in educational achievement.

In some parts of London housing developments have been built for black tenants only.

In Enfield, North London, "whites not welcome" graffiti was sprayed at a Primary school.

In the English midlands a white family moving into a housing development has been threatened on the grounds that its "for black sisters and brothers" only.

The former head of the Commission for Racial Equality, Trevor Phillips, is lamenting the fact that Great Britain is 'sleepwalking into segregation'  where communities are living parallel lives but he is ignoring the fact that it is at the behest of his own black community.

One journalist is even claiming that "ethnic minorities deserve safe spaces without white people".

There is no bigger example of apartheid and separate development than the hundreds of Muslim only areas administered by shariah law where medieval cultural practices are performed with impunity and where the anti-apartheid zealots remain silent.(See here)

How things change as the years go by; the current British government and its establishment, filled to the gunwales no doubt with anti-apartheid zealots from the past, are too addicted to political correctness to stop segregation and are now actually funding it.

One is bound to ask the question why, if ethnic minorities dislike Great Britain and its people to the extent they want to institute apartheid and live separate lives, why on earth to do they bother making the journey to this damp, windswept island in the north Atlantic often from more desirable locations and why the agitators from the past remain silent?

South Africa. Peter Hain Shuns His Rainbow Nation

South Africa was in the news recently when American Supreme Court Judges Elena Kagan and Ruth Bader Ginsburg complemented the ruinous, socialist based South African Constitution, and in the case of Ginsburg disparaged her own Constitution as not worth the parchment its written on.

As a reminder; after the overthrow of apartheid and despite inheriting one of the wealthiest economies on the planet South Africa, like its neighbour Zimbabwe, has descended into a poverty stricken, diseased, crime ridden kleptocracy.

On the other hand the USA under its Constitution, which guarantees individual liberty and limited government, has delivered peace, freedom and prosperity for the vast majority of its citizens.

Global 'progressive' spinners centred on the UN, who are incapable of admitting the truth, would have us believe that the South African people are much better off as a multi-cultural Rainbow Nation than they were under the apartheid regime. If the spin is to be believed, all the races mingle happily together and the country is at ease with itself.

This could not be further from the truth but the objective of the global 'progressives' was ending of apartheid regardless of the consequences for the people.

Unfortunately this false view of a benign South Africa is widely held and is proof that the PR image makers can make the intellectually challenged people of this world believe anything they want them to.

If any further evidence is needed that the PR image makers can achieve the impossible then its the transformation of Peter Hain from a political impostor and runaway coward into a fearless warrior against apartheid.

Associating Peter Hain with the downfall of apartheid is an insult to those who didn't run away and who stayed behind to endure the hardships of civil strife.

Quoting from an earlier post;  the spinners tell us that Peter Hain bravely ran messages for the African National Congress (ANC) and at the age of ten his bedroom was searched by the police looking for incriminating evidence.

The PR men and spinners attempted to give Hain credibility as a conciliator for delivering the eulogy at the funeral of terrorist John Harris. He was hanged for murdering a 77 year old woman and mutilating 23 innocent civilians when he placed a bomb at a railway station.

He would have got more credibility among his black countrymen had he denounced Harris as the bloody indiscriminate murderer that he was.

After a banning order the Hain family decided to abandon their comrades to their fate and run away to the safety of Great Britain.

Peter Hain went on to finish the elite education that he started in South Africa before embarking on his political career by joining the Liberal Party and becoming a Trade Union researcher.

At the same time Hain was building up a reputation as an anti-apartheid campaigner but his fearless opposition consisted only of the 'Stop the Tour' campaigns against the South African rugby and cricket tours of Great Britain.

At no personal risk whatsoever he was involved with digging up cricket wickets and scattering nails on rugby pitches then milking the subsequent publicity for all it was worth.

Among the majority of the British people Peter Hain was nothing more than an irritating publicity seeker and outside of the usual motley band of pimpled full time activists he was universally despised.

Hain realised he had no chance of a political career as a Trade Union researcher belonging to the Liberal Party so he 'discovered' socialism, stabbed his colleagues in the back by dumping the Liberals and joining the more electable Labour Party.

It is worth noting that at the same time as Hain was using the anti-apartheid movement to further his political ambitions the real campaigners back in his native South Africa were still being harassed and imprisoned.

Peter Hain went on to have a political career noted for its backstabbing, expense scandals incompetence and police investigations into alleged corruption.

As a government minister, and as he did with his comrades back in his native land, he indicated his willingness to sell out the proud and loyal people of Gibraltar to the Spanish despite the fact that they had voted in referendums to remain British.

He was prepared to do the same to the people of Northern Ireland by selling them out to the Republic of Ireland against their wishes.

Needless to say Hain is despised by the people of Ulster and the Rock to this day.

As the record shows Peter Hain, having 'fundamentally transformed' Great Britain into a northern version of South Africa, he has retired to the backbenches to await his sinecure in the House of Lords or the European Union.

What is certain is that Hain will not be retiring to his native South Africa despite it being the much lauded multi-cultural, Rainbow Nation at ease with itself.

Many people are mystified as to why Peter Hain would prefer the gloomy, inclement, post industrial, welfare addicted towns of Neath and Port Talbot to Cape Town or Port Elizabeth with their wonderful vistas, perfect climates and supposedly harmonious communities.

The truth is that the so called Rainbow Nation is an artificial construct of the UN spinners to cover the fact that the deconstrucion of the apartheid system was poorly handled resulting in a disaster for the South African people.

Just as the downfall of the Smith Regime in Zimbabwe was more important to the global 'progressives' than the empty bellies of the people left behind, so the downfall of the apartheid regime was an end in itself . It was done simply to satisfy the emotional needs of the global 'progressives' while the well being of the South African people was was not even a consideration.

If Peter Hain thinks that the new South Africa is as good as the spinners claim it is then surely he would be there in preference to a gloomy, damp South Wales town.

The following are some of Hain's commie comrades who didn't run away.

Denis Goldberg      Helen Suzman        Billy Nair                      David Webster
Dr Nico Smith        Harry Schwarz       Ahmed Kathrada           Harry Lawrence
Colin Eglin             Berbard Spong       Joe Slovo