The noise generated by the Brexit debate is emanating from
the fight about a trade deal and the prorogation of Parliament, but it has also
allowed the politicians to avoid debating the more destructive aspects of
continued European Union membership.
Among these are the remaining articles of the Lisbon
Constitution which will become effective in 2022 such as requiring Great
Britain to join the disastrous Eurozone and the equally disastrous open border
Schengen area. They failed to debate the ending of the national veto and the
surrender of control over any remaining areas which in any independent nation
state should be under the control of the people via their elected Parliament.
They failed to debate their surrendering control over
taxation to corrupt, money hungry bureaucrats in Brussels and worst of all they
failed to debate their plan to surrender the command and control of the British Armed Forces which for British patriots is a step too far.
The European Union has always been sold as a benign economic
project concerned with trading in a single, tariff-free market plus membership
of a customs union. The truth is that the European Union is, and always has
been, a nation building project with the aim of replacing the independent
nation states of Europe with a single state centrally controlled by appointed
bureaucrats based in Brussels.
If the European Union is not a nation building project then Parliament
needs to explain to the people why a benign economic project concerned only
with a tariff-free single market and a customs union needs an army, a navy and an air
force along with a flag, a national anthem, a Parliament, a judiciary and
embassies abroad.
The more vocal and fanatical nation builders such as Angela
Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and Guy Verhofstadt have openly called for an
independent European Army but this has always been strenuously denied by the
British political elite and even dismissed as a ‘dangerous fantasy’ by the former Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg.
Incidentally, Merkel, Macron and Verhofstadt justify their
call for an independent European Defence Force because of the need to defend
the European Union from its enemies such as Russia, China and the United States.
That would be the same United States that has guaranteed the
security of Europe since WWII as the biggest contributor to NATO, but I
digress.
Unbeknown to the British public, the political elite have
been involved in the planning of a European Defence Force since its inception
with the intention of fully integrating the British military into its
structure. This would require surrendering command and control to a Eurocrat
who may hold historical grudges against the British people especially now since
they voted to leave their failing nation building project.
This brings us to the treachery of the former Prime
Minister, Theresa May. Known rightly as Theresa the Appeaser, Mrs. May had been
planning behind closed doors to integrate the British armed forces into the
fledgling European Defence Force (EDF) since taking office.
Those experts with an eye for detail have determined that
Mrs. May’s Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration, the infamous
surrender document, that supposedly delivered Brexit, not only made Great Britain
subservient to the European Union in perpetuity, it also committed the British
armed forces to fully integrate with the EDF.
As a measure of Mrs. May's dedication to the European nation
building project, she planned to integrate the British armed forces into the
EDF and surrender command and control after Great Britain had left the European Union.
This proves that she never intended to honour the result of
the peoples’ referendum or she planned to rejoin the EU sometime in the future after
the Brexit issue had cooled down.
In more than three years of debate, Parliament has not
discussed any of the items mentioned earlier especially not the surrender of Great
Britain’s armed forces to the Eurocrats. It took Lord James of Blackheath from the upper chamber
to bring it to the nation's attention for which he was roundly booed by the rest of their
Lordships.
Parliament is packed to the rafters with people who are
totally committed to the European nation building project and who give their unyielding loyalty to the fledgling United States of Europe. They know that this project
will fail if a prosperous Great Britain is allowed to exist outside its
clutches.
Their loyalty to the European Union is so fanatical they are
determined to hand over what remains of peoples’ sovereignty as well as their
armed forces to a cabal of faceless, unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels who cannot be removed via the ballot box.
They don’t care that their utter contempt for the people they are supposed to be representing is out in the open. Remaining in the EU is everything to them, it is their Caliphate.
They don’t care that their utter contempt for the people they are supposed to be representing is out in the open. Remaining in the EU is everything to them, it is their Caliphate.
To conclude: Treason is a horrendous crime against a nation
and its people and can take many forms but even the layman can see that by
colluding secretly with a foreign power to hand over the governance of the
nation and control of its military is treason most foul.
Two shocking articles that exposes the extent of their treachery:
May's secret, scandalous surrender of our defence.
Lt Gen Riley's briefing on the defence threat of hidden EU deals
Two shocking articles that exposes the extent of their treachery:
May's secret, scandalous surrender of our defence.
Lt Gen Riley's briefing on the defence threat of hidden EU deals
They merely dance to the tune of their owner. That would be Schwartz György.
ReplyDeleteThey do indeed. Schwartz one very powerful individual who is obviously above the law.
Delete