Surrendering Control of The Military Is the Ultimate Treason

The noise generated by the Brexit debate is emanating from the fight about a trade deal and the prorogation of Parliament, but it has also allowed the politicians to avoid debating the more destructive aspects of continued European Union membership.

Among these are the remaining articles of the Lisbon Constitution which will become effective in 2022 such as requiring Great Britain to join the disastrous Eurozone and the equally disastrous open border Schengen area. They failed to debate the ending of the national veto and the surrender of control over any remaining areas which in any independent nation state should be under the control of the people via their elected Parliament.

They failed to debate their surrendering control over taxation to corrupt, money hungry bureaucrats in Brussels and worst of all they failed to debate their plan to surrender the command and control of the British Armed Forces which for British patriots is a step too far.

The European Union has always been sold as a benign economic project concerned with trading in a single, tariff-free market plus membership of a customs union. The truth is that the European Union is, and always has been, a nation building project with the aim of replacing the independent nation states of Europe with a single state centrally controlled by appointed bureaucrats based in Brussels.

If the European Union is not a nation building project then Parliament needs to explain to the people why a benign economic project concerned only with a tariff-free single market and a customs union needs an army, a navy and an air force along with a flag, a national anthem, a Parliament, a judiciary and embassies abroad.

The more vocal and fanatical nation builders such as Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and Guy Verhofstadt have openly called for an independent European Army but this has always been strenuously denied by the British political elite and even dismissed as a ‘dangerous fantasy’ by the former Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg.

Incidentally, Merkel, Macron and Verhofstadt justify their call for an independent European Defence Force because of the need to defend the European Union from its enemies such as Russia, China and the United States.

That would be the same United States that has guaranteed the security of Europe since WWII as the biggest contributor to NATO, but I digress.

Unbeknown to the British public, the political elite have been involved in the planning of a European Defence Force since its inception with the intention of fully integrating the British military into its structure. This would require surrendering command and control to a Eurocrat who may hold historical grudges against the British people especially now since they voted to leave their failing nation building project.

This brings us to the treachery of the former Prime Minister, Theresa May. Known rightly as Theresa the Appeaser, Mrs. May had been planning behind closed doors to integrate the British armed forces into the fledgling European Defence Force (EDF) since taking office.

Those experts with an eye for detail have determined that Mrs. May’s Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration, the infamous surrender document, that supposedly delivered Brexit, not only made Great Britain subservient to the European Union in perpetuity, it also committed the British armed forces to fully integrate with the EDF.

As a measure of Mrs. May's dedication to the European nation building project, she planned to integrate the British armed forces into the EDF and surrender command and control after Great Britain had left the European Union.

This proves that she never intended to honour the result of the peoples’ referendum or she planned to rejoin the EU sometime in the future after the Brexit issue had cooled down.

In more than three years of debate, Parliament has not discussed any of the items mentioned earlier especially not the surrender of Great Britain’s armed forces to the Eurocrats. It took Lord James of Blackheath from the upper chamber to bring it to the nation's attention for which he was roundly booed by the rest of their Lordships.

Parliament is packed to the rafters with people who are totally committed to the European nation building project and who give their unyielding loyalty to the fledgling United States of Europe. They know that this project will fail if a prosperous Great Britain is allowed to exist outside its clutches.

Their loyalty to the European Union is so fanatical they are determined to hand over what remains of peoples’ sovereignty as well as their armed forces to a cabal of faceless, unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels who cannot be removed via the ballot box.

They don’t care that their utter contempt for the people they are supposed to be representing is out in the open. Remaining in the EU is everything to them, it is their Caliphate.    

To conclude: Treason is a horrendous crime against a nation and its people and can take many forms but even the layman can see that by colluding secretly with a foreign power to hand over the governance of the nation and control of its military is treason most foul.


Two shocking articles that exposes the extent of their treachery:


May's secret, scandalous surrender of our defence.


Lt Gen Riley's briefing on the defence threat of hidden EU deals

Politicians - The Enemies of The People and Democracy

There is no group of people more duplicitous and outright treacherous than the politicians that infest the fetid swamp of the Westminster Parliament. Their contempt for the people is out in the open for all to see and their pretense of representing the people or protecting their interests is truly nauseating to behold.

It was these same Parliamentarians that passed a law to let the people decide in a once only, binding referendum in June 2016 on whether to leave or remain in the European Union (EU). It was these same Parliamentarians that promised to honor the result and faithfully implement the peoples’ decision.

In the 2017 general election both major parties were elected on a solemn promise to implement the result of the Brexit referendum subsequently attracting 80% of the votes cast.

It was these same Parliamentarians that passed a law triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which started the two-year leaving mechanism for member states. This two-year period ends on the 29^th March 2019.

Despite these huge mandates and promises, the politicians have spent the two-year leaving period engaged in a campaign to either ignore the referendum result or overturn it and keep the British people locked inside a corrupt political union that wants to abolish their nation and absorb it into a centrally controlled superstate.

During the hours and days of debate in Parliament the transfer of sovereignty from Parliament to Brussels was never raised as an issue. A procession of speakers rose to talk about the disastrous effect of Brexit on the economy and trade and go on to demand that Brexit is delayed or a second referendum be put to people where leaving under WTO rules is not on the ballot paper.

Since Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement is a Brexit in name only which keeps Great Britain locked inside the EU institutions, what the Parliamentarians are demanding is a second referendum where leaving the EU is not on the ballot paper.

The transfer of sovereignty in the past, not the economy or trade, is the reason millions voted for Brexit. The surrender of control over borders and immigration, legislation, trade, the judicial system and other crucial areas was proving too much for a proud, freedom loving people with a tradition of patriotism and independence.

It is the attitude of the politicians to sovereignty that condemns them into the pit of contempt they so richly deserve. They claim Parliament is sovereign not the people so only they should decide whether the country leaves the EU or not.

This is the same political class that has been transferring Parliamentary sovereignty to the EU for decades without the promised consent of the people via referenda.

Since Great Britain joined the Common Market (the EU predecessor) in 1972 the political class have insisted that this was an economic project not a nation building political project and therefore no sovereignty would be transferred. In a degradation of debate that lingers to this day, anyone who suggested otherwise was accused of scaremongering and smeared accordingly.

Despite the obvious surrender of sovereignty from the Westminster Parliament to the EU Commission in Brussels the political class continue to ignore it as a primary reason the British people voted to leave.

What is at stake is Great Britain continuing as an independent, self-governing nation or becoming a powerless vassal state of a centrally controlled United States of Europe.       

To sum up, all the big guns of the EU have been consistent in their call for Great Britain and the other member states to transfer their sovereignty from national Parliaments to the unelected EU Commission which has executive power and is sole the initiator of legislation for the entire Union.

Germany’s megalomaniac Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and her yapping lapdog Emmanuel Macron of France demand that member states surrender their sovereignty while EU Presidents, Jean-Claude Junker and Donald Tusk work in tandem to facilitate the transfer using legislation and binding treaties. ( Read about Mad Merkel and Junker on transferring sovereignty here and here )

No student of politics can forget the epic rant of EU fanatic Guy Verhofstadt demanding nation states surrender their sovereignty to him and his Fourth Reich.

In a clear demonstration of their complete and utter contempt for the country and its people, this is the Great Britain hating fanatic that the EU Parliament appointed as their chief negotiator for Brexit.

Watch the demented Belgian lunatic here and here

The politicians that infest the Westminster swamp claim to be a sovereign Parliament but have spent their time since the 2016 referendum trying to overturn Brexit and hand over the peoples’ sovereignty and their own legislative functions to a closed cabal of unelected foreign bureaucrats in a foreign land.

That’s treason in anybody’s book.


WESTMINSTER - House of Traitors by Arthur Disbury