One of the reasons that the socialist/communist/progressive community has been so successful at usurping global political power is the inability of the majority of voters to see through the spin and media manipulation of the ruling political class.
These PR men and professional spinners are so skilled in their black arts they can manipulate the unfortunate dumbed down community to believe anything they choose. Even supposedly intelligent people can fall victim to the malign influence of these propagandists.
While flipping channels trying to find the Man U v Tottenham Hotspur soccer game, I had the misfortune of coming across an interview with the 'Progressive' in Chief from across the water. This interview took place after his return from the Mandela death jamboree in South Africa. Barry Obama/Soetoro kept referring to the late celebrity terrorist Nelson Mandela, not by usual name, but by the term 'Madiba'.
Not to be outdone, Great Britain's PR media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, has also started to use 'Madiba' when referring to Mandela. It would appear that in the ever-so-trendy circles inhabited by the 'progressive' elite, the process of rehabilitation and legend-creating of a former terrorist has started in earnest.
From the deluge of articles that followed the passing of 'Madiba', and in particular the over the top fawning coverage from the taxpayer funded BBC, little mention was made of his terrorist past as the founder and leader of the Maoist inspired Umkhono we Sizwe. (The Spear of the Nation)
The Spear of The Nation was the armed wing of the communist run African National Congress (ANC) which was dedicated to the violent overthrow of the state.
If the PR men and spin doctors are to be believed then 'Madiba's' life begins with his trial and imprisonment, with particular focus on his incarceration on Robben Island; his early life is being sanitized or discreetly airbrushed from history.
'Madiba's' history of domestic violence against his first wife, Evelyn Mase, is being studiously ignored as is his indifference to his children. His commitment to the violent overthrow of the state was total and it took priority even over his wives and children.
The people will not be told by the global 'progressive' media that 'Madiba' was a committed terrorist who was responsible for planting Improvised Explosive Devices (IED's) indiscriminately in public places. History is being distorted and re-written in order portray him as a saintly, fearless fighter of apartheid.
Whereas the media proclaim that 'Madiba' was imprisoned for so called 'anti-apartheid activities', the truth is that he was caught, then convicted in a court of law and jailed, for being a self confessed terrorist. Terrorists are being held in prisons the world over, without comment from the media including Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
The only difference between Robben Island and Guantanamo Bay is that the inmates of the former were sentenced after the due process of law and a trial.
The question that must be asked is why has Nelson Mandela been singled out by the ever-so-trendy global 'progressive' community and not any of the other incarcerated terrorists who have risked their lives for the causes that they happen believe in?
The answer turns out to be rather simple and stems from the desire by those that control the UN for a global government based on the socialist model. All nations, peoples and ethnic groups must be equal.
No one nation, people or ethnic group should not be more prosperous than another, hence South Africa and Zimbabwe was an affront to their perverted ideology and had to be destroyed. Especially when that prosperity is created from an untouched land by white Europeans.
Everyone with an iota of political nous, knew what was going to happen when Robert 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe was installed in Zimbabwe. The bread basket of Africa, where there were no empty bellies under the Ian Smith government, has been reduced to a violent, crime ridden Marxists state with a brutalised population of starving, warring tribes.
In the perverted minds of the global 'progressive' community, ideological purity takes priority over the well being of the people every time.
Ignoring the fact that 'Madiba' was a convicted terrorist, he was adopted by the global 'progressive' community, (including every multi-millionaire publicity seeking celebrity), as the focal point for bringing down the government, ignoring the disastrous experience of black rule in neighbouring Zimbabwe.
Despite the pretence and the legend building, South Africa is going the same way. The mythical Rainbow Nation where all races and ethnic groups are supposed to be getting along in a spirit of peace, love and mutual respect, has descended into a Zimbabwe type Marxist dystopia wracked with inter-tribal violence and starvation.
The manufactured image created by the global 'progressive' media cannot keep this appalling situation from the world for ever and the truth about the Rainbow Nation and 'Madiba' will eventually come out.
In the spirit of reconciliation and fairness, and in line with the UN and the global media's treatment of Nelson Mandela, the following terrorists are being renamed:
Terrorist turned politician and former Irish Republican Army (IRA) leader, Martin McGuiness, will now be known as 'Seanathair'. For those unfamiliar with Gaelic, 'McGuinadiba' is acceptable
Referring to Robert Mugabe as 'Butcher Bob' is considered to be judgmental therefore he will in future be referred to as 'Bapu'. For those unfamiliar with African tongues, 'Mugabadiba' may be substituted.
Abu 'The Hook' Hamza who lost his hand fighting the Russians in Afghanistan will be renamed 'Jiddo'. If Arabic proves to be too difficult then 'Hamzabida' may be used.
Bill Ayres, American domestic terrorist, indiscriminate bomber and friend of Barry Obama, has already been rehabilitated but will now be known affectionately as Grandpappyadiba in honour of his valiant attempt to violently overthrow the state.
Finally, Illich Ramirez Sanchez, better known as Carlos the Jackal, the global terrorist who is currently languishing in a French prison for pursuing the noble aims of overthrowing capitalism and erasing Israel from the face of the earth, will be renamed 'Abuela on his eventual release from chokey. If Spanish proves too difficult then 'Jackalababadiba' will suffice.
Unfortunately, that other IRA terrorist turned politician, Gerry Adams will not be renamed on account of his support for his paedophile brother Liam who raped and sexually abused his own daughter.
Aine Tyrell's uncle Gerry was aware of her torment but did nothing for reasons only known to himself. How he sleeps at night is a mystery. However in the spirit of reconciliation he may be referred to unofficially as 'Nonce Protector Emeritus'.
Pmsl
Showing posts with label 'Progressive Agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'Progressive Agenda. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Thursday, November 7, 2013
British Justice Hits A New Low - Victims Sacrificed On The Altar Of Progressivism
It is understandable how just a cursory glance at the daily newspapers is enough to make the blood of the calmest people boil with rage. Some of the headlines highlight outrageous stories that demonstrate the yawning chasm between the ruling establishment and the people they are elected to represent.
Free thinking bloggers are lucky in that they can remain calm and use their ability to wipe away the cobwebs of spin and deceit to get at the real motives of the people behind the headlines.
It is now an established fact that the political class across the Anglosphere, together with their attendant bureaucracies, are imposing a transformational "progressive" agenda at the behest of the UN/EU supranational cabal. This agenda is against the expressed wishes of the people they are supposed to be representing.
In Great Britain, it is also an established fact that all parts of the establishment have been stuffed to gunwales with like minded cronies who serve as the governments storm troopers in imposing this agenda, this includes demographic and cultural replacement.
There is no bigger part of the establishment that demonstrates this more than the bewigged, gin soaked imbeciles that masquerade as judges. They preside over a criminal justice system that is so corrupted by 'progressivism' that applying the law and establishing justice has been abandoned in favour of implementing their perverted agenda.
In the twisted minds of the 'progressives', criminals are deemed not to be bad people who do not act with malice aforethought; instead they are deemed to have been created by an uncaring society which does not pay enough attention to the wants and needs of some of their fellow citizens.
'Progressives' also believe that the British people's imperialist past is to blame for all the ills in the world and therefore they must be ethnically cleansed in order to prevent a possible repeat of their civilizing past.
They have also decided that the term 'ethnic cleansing' has too many negative connotations, therefore they use the more politically correct term, 'de-homogenising'.
This policy is continuing at a rapid pace and the latest figures show that the indigenous population are already a minority in Great Britain's largest cities, while the entire country will be past the tipping point by the year 2030.
It is safe to assume that as the political class and the establishment are aware of this fact, and because they are not taking any steps whatsoever to prevent it, they must agree with the policy of ethnic cleansing, de-homogenizing, cultural replacement or whatever fancy name they choose to call it.
Some of the bizarre judgments and sentences handed down by these misnamed guardians of justice reflect the fact that they are applying the law selectively to suit their agenda with an enthusiasm that exposes their own purpose.
The case of Lucy Walsh is a harrowing example of criminals getting preferential treatment while the victim and her family are studiously ignored. It also a clear demonstration of how low the British criminal justice system will sink in pursuit of its 'progressive' agenda.
Lucy was kidnapped then stripped, beaten and gang raped multiple times by three illegal Kurdish immigrants; they laughed among themselves as she cried out in pain. After they had finished their brutal attack, Lucy was dragged down the stairs by her hair and unceremoniously thrown into street.
Her internal injuries were so sever it was a full four days before she could be given a proper medical examination. Two of these savages were caught and the third is still on the run.
Any person who possesses even a minutest sense of justice would agree that hanging is too good for these sub-humans, but this is 'progressive' Britain, where immigrants have exalted status and the perpetrators of crime are the victims of society.
They were given indeterminate sentences but to an activist judge, who puts his 'progressive' agenda before justice or the victim's trauma, this was deemed to be too severe. He reduced their sentences on appeal to twelve years in the full knowledge they will out in six.
To add insult to injury, and to demonstrate the exalted status given to illegal immigrants, one of the savages was granted British citizenship while in prison awaiting trial.
Lucy and her family have expressed their disgust and lack of faith with the criminal justice system, while Lucy herself has emigrated for fear that the remaining rapist will track her down.
In another case, a gang of thugs severely beat and robbed a veteran of the Afghan war and this also serves to demonstrate how lenient 'progressive' judges are when dealing with people they deem to be 'victims of society'.
Five young thugs beat a soldier and continued to beat him until he was unconscious on the ground. The hero suffered multiple injuries including broken ribs and a damaged kidney.
The headline reads that the cowardly thugs were sentenced to twelve years in prison, but closer reading reveals that it was twelve years total for all of them, as opposed to twelve years each. Some of these thugs will be free in less than a year.
The case of triple killer Ian McLoughlin is a shocking example of judges putting 'progressive' politics before the interests of the people. This animal was originally jailed for killing his friend with a hammer. He was released and murdered a father of three, after which he was given a 'life' sentence.
While out on day release from this supposed 'life' sentence, he murdered a sixty six year old pensioner who caught him robbing his eighty six year old neighbor.
The presiding judge was unable to give McLoughlin a life sentence because, apparently, the unelected bureaucrats in EU deemed that this would be inhumane.......to the killer.
Many consider these absurd rulings to be advisory and they are continually ignored by other EU countries. It would appear that British activist judges are only too happy to comply with their fellow 'progressives' from across the English Channel.
Before concluding, it's worth returning to the issue of politically active 'progressive' judges, legal and illegal immigrants and their own attitude to the long suffering British people.
Joland Giwa is a violent gang leader who arrived from Lagos in 1999 and claimed asylum; instead of being grateful to the British people for saving him from a miserable life in oil rich Nigeria, he embarked on a criminal career and was in trouble with the police by 2002. Despite this criminality, in act of contempt for the British people and in complete disregard for their safety, he was given 'leave to remain' in the country. This enabled him to continue his violent criminal career and he was subsequently jailed for robbery.
His deportation has been delayed by doubts about his country of origin and a judge has ordered that he be released onto the streets regardless of the police warning that Giwa "is a serious threat to the public with a clear propensity for violence".
The option of detaining him "at Her Majesty's Pleasure" has long been given up in favour of giving immigrants 'leave to remain' no matter how heinous their crime. So as the option of putting him on a Nigeria Airlines flight back to Lagos from whence he came.
The case of Algerian immigrant, Aziz Lamari, is final proof, if any were needed, that British judges are either from another planet or they have total disregard for the British people while in pursuit of their political agenda.
Aziz Lamari arrived on British shores from the former French colony of Algeria and claimed asylum. Like Giwa before him, instead showing gratitude to the British people he rewarded their kindness by embarking on criminal career. He didn't waste any time and was jailed the following year for robbery.
Deportation proceedings were started but it turned out that Lamari was detained for twenty three days extra. He subsequently returned to Algeria but someone, somewhere, decided that he had been treated abominably and therefore deserves compensation from the British taxpayer, who's generosity he abused.
Instead of throwing the case out of court and saving the taxpayer some hard earned money, the judge agreed that the extra twenty three days in jail was the cause of mental problems for the poor soul and awarded the Algerian criminal $40,000 of taxpayer money.
The pain and suffering of Lamari's victims or the much abused British people were obviously not a consideration for this so called defender of justice.
The question the British people need an urgent answer for is this: After his return to Algeria why wasn't this criminal just forgotten about? The case should have been over when he fastened his seat belt on the flight back to his homeland.
In conclusion it must be noted that there are almost four thousand foreign murderers, rapists and other criminals on the streets of Great Britain, including eight hundred who have been free for five years or more, because the judges will not allow the pathetically weak politicians to deport them.
It should come as no surprise as to who is picking up the tab for this nonsense, a tab which doesn't include the $88 million that it costs to keep fifteen hundred criminals in prison 'beyond their sentence' while awaiting deportation.
Reading though this, it is obvious that the political class, together their establishment, are more interested in showing off their 'progressive' credentials to the international elite that are blighting the lives of the British people, than doing the job that they are paid to do.
Free thinking bloggers are lucky in that they can remain calm and use their ability to wipe away the cobwebs of spin and deceit to get at the real motives of the people behind the headlines.
It is now an established fact that the political class across the Anglosphere, together with their attendant bureaucracies, are imposing a transformational "progressive" agenda at the behest of the UN/EU supranational cabal. This agenda is against the expressed wishes of the people they are supposed to be representing.
In Great Britain, it is also an established fact that all parts of the establishment have been stuffed to gunwales with like minded cronies who serve as the governments storm troopers in imposing this agenda, this includes demographic and cultural replacement.
There is no bigger part of the establishment that demonstrates this more than the bewigged, gin soaked imbeciles that masquerade as judges. They preside over a criminal justice system that is so corrupted by 'progressivism' that applying the law and establishing justice has been abandoned in favour of implementing their perverted agenda.
In the twisted minds of the 'progressives', criminals are deemed not to be bad people who do not act with malice aforethought; instead they are deemed to have been created by an uncaring society which does not pay enough attention to the wants and needs of some of their fellow citizens.
'Progressives' also believe that the British people's imperialist past is to blame for all the ills in the world and therefore they must be ethnically cleansed in order to prevent a possible repeat of their civilizing past.
They have also decided that the term 'ethnic cleansing' has too many negative connotations, therefore they use the more politically correct term, 'de-homogenising'.
This policy is continuing at a rapid pace and the latest figures show that the indigenous population are already a minority in Great Britain's largest cities, while the entire country will be past the tipping point by the year 2030.
It is safe to assume that as the political class and the establishment are aware of this fact, and because they are not taking any steps whatsoever to prevent it, they must agree with the policy of ethnic cleansing, de-homogenizing, cultural replacement or whatever fancy name they choose to call it.
Some of the bizarre judgments and sentences handed down by these misnamed guardians of justice reflect the fact that they are applying the law selectively to suit their agenda with an enthusiasm that exposes their own purpose.
The case of Lucy Walsh is a harrowing example of criminals getting preferential treatment while the victim and her family are studiously ignored. It also a clear demonstration of how low the British criminal justice system will sink in pursuit of its 'progressive' agenda.
Lucy was kidnapped then stripped, beaten and gang raped multiple times by three illegal Kurdish immigrants; they laughed among themselves as she cried out in pain. After they had finished their brutal attack, Lucy was dragged down the stairs by her hair and unceremoniously thrown into street.
Her internal injuries were so sever it was a full four days before she could be given a proper medical examination. Two of these savages were caught and the third is still on the run.
Any person who possesses even a minutest sense of justice would agree that hanging is too good for these sub-humans, but this is 'progressive' Britain, where immigrants have exalted status and the perpetrators of crime are the victims of society.
They were given indeterminate sentences but to an activist judge, who puts his 'progressive' agenda before justice or the victim's trauma, this was deemed to be too severe. He reduced their sentences on appeal to twelve years in the full knowledge they will out in six.
To add insult to injury, and to demonstrate the exalted status given to illegal immigrants, one of the savages was granted British citizenship while in prison awaiting trial.
Lucy and her family have expressed their disgust and lack of faith with the criminal justice system, while Lucy herself has emigrated for fear that the remaining rapist will track her down.
In another case, a gang of thugs severely beat and robbed a veteran of the Afghan war and this also serves to demonstrate how lenient 'progressive' judges are when dealing with people they deem to be 'victims of society'.
Five young thugs beat a soldier and continued to beat him until he was unconscious on the ground. The hero suffered multiple injuries including broken ribs and a damaged kidney.
The headline reads that the cowardly thugs were sentenced to twelve years in prison, but closer reading reveals that it was twelve years total for all of them, as opposed to twelve years each. Some of these thugs will be free in less than a year.
The case of triple killer Ian McLoughlin is a shocking example of judges putting 'progressive' politics before the interests of the people. This animal was originally jailed for killing his friend with a hammer. He was released and murdered a father of three, after which he was given a 'life' sentence.
While out on day release from this supposed 'life' sentence, he murdered a sixty six year old pensioner who caught him robbing his eighty six year old neighbor.
The presiding judge was unable to give McLoughlin a life sentence because, apparently, the unelected bureaucrats in EU deemed that this would be inhumane.......to the killer.
Many consider these absurd rulings to be advisory and they are continually ignored by other EU countries. It would appear that British activist judges are only too happy to comply with their fellow 'progressives' from across the English Channel.
Before concluding, it's worth returning to the issue of politically active 'progressive' judges, legal and illegal immigrants and their own attitude to the long suffering British people.
Joland Giwa is a violent gang leader who arrived from Lagos in 1999 and claimed asylum; instead of being grateful to the British people for saving him from a miserable life in oil rich Nigeria, he embarked on a criminal career and was in trouble with the police by 2002. Despite this criminality, in act of contempt for the British people and in complete disregard for their safety, he was given 'leave to remain' in the country. This enabled him to continue his violent criminal career and he was subsequently jailed for robbery.
His deportation has been delayed by doubts about his country of origin and a judge has ordered that he be released onto the streets regardless of the police warning that Giwa "is a serious threat to the public with a clear propensity for violence".
The option of detaining him "at Her Majesty's Pleasure" has long been given up in favour of giving immigrants 'leave to remain' no matter how heinous their crime. So as the option of putting him on a Nigeria Airlines flight back to Lagos from whence he came.
The case of Algerian immigrant, Aziz Lamari, is final proof, if any were needed, that British judges are either from another planet or they have total disregard for the British people while in pursuit of their political agenda.
Aziz Lamari arrived on British shores from the former French colony of Algeria and claimed asylum. Like Giwa before him, instead showing gratitude to the British people he rewarded their kindness by embarking on criminal career. He didn't waste any time and was jailed the following year for robbery.
Deportation proceedings were started but it turned out that Lamari was detained for twenty three days extra. He subsequently returned to Algeria but someone, somewhere, decided that he had been treated abominably and therefore deserves compensation from the British taxpayer, who's generosity he abused.
Instead of throwing the case out of court and saving the taxpayer some hard earned money, the judge agreed that the extra twenty three days in jail was the cause of mental problems for the poor soul and awarded the Algerian criminal $40,000 of taxpayer money.
The pain and suffering of Lamari's victims or the much abused British people were obviously not a consideration for this so called defender of justice.
The question the British people need an urgent answer for is this: After his return to Algeria why wasn't this criminal just forgotten about? The case should have been over when he fastened his seat belt on the flight back to his homeland.
In conclusion it must be noted that there are almost four thousand foreign murderers, rapists and other criminals on the streets of Great Britain, including eight hundred who have been free for five years or more, because the judges will not allow the pathetically weak politicians to deport them.
It should come as no surprise as to who is picking up the tab for this nonsense, a tab which doesn't include the $88 million that it costs to keep fifteen hundred criminals in prison 'beyond their sentence' while awaiting deportation.
Reading though this, it is obvious that the political class, together their establishment, are more interested in showing off their 'progressive' credentials to the international elite that are blighting the lives of the British people, than doing the job that they are paid to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)