Thursday, December 18, 2014

Bloodshed in Sydney, Peshawar, Boston Ad Nauseam - Don't Blame Islam??

The list of atrocities across the planet carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah, on the orders of his prophet, and as written in the Koran, are becoming more frequent and ever more appalling.

A day after the terrorist attack on the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Sydney came the shocking attack on a school in Peshawar, Pakistan where Muslim terrorists murdered one hundred and thirty two school children and thirteen adults. Not content with killing school kids, these animals burned a teacher to death in front of them.

These instances of pre-planned, cold blooded murder of innocent civilians going about their daily lives raises several important issues, with two in particular that should be of concern to everyone.

Firstly, with the short attention span of the public, combined with the control of the twenty-four hour worldwide news cycle by government media managers, these atrocities will be virtually forgotten within days, having been replaced by some engineered celebrity imbecility or major sporting event.

It is my guess that very few people will recall the incidents which took place only two months ago on October 22nd, and another one a day later*, which attracted saturation news coverage at the time. These incidents, which generated the usual pre-prepared slogans and soundbites that political leaders around the world keep in stock for such occasions, have now been virtually forgotten.

These slogans and soundbites are all the same format and are delivered by media trained Prime Ministers and Presidents with as much emotion as a campaign speech or new policy announcement. They consist of condolences for the families of the victims, buckets full of faux outrage and crocodile tears then finished off with with false promises to leave no stone unturned in order to bring the perpetrators to justice.

In the following days these same leaders and their acolytes will make choreographed appearances in the media with some tough sounding rhetoric assuring the people that they are on their side. This will be accompanied by some more vague promises which they know they will not carry out.

There will be no practical, effective actions to deal with Muslim terrorism at home or abroad for the simple reason that the global political elite are committed to imposing Islam on western civilisation as part of their post war agenda of re-ordering the planet.

Secondly, and more worrying, is the attempt by the politicians of western governments to distance Islam from these atrocities and absolve it from blame. This is despite the fact that the perpetrators and their worldwide supporters claim responsibility for their despicable acts and rejoice at every drop of infidel blood they spill.

If people around the world took the election of Tony Abbot in Australia as a sign that a common sense political leader from the real world had at last stepped onto the global stage, then his refusal to blame Islam for the killings in Sydney will come as a crushing disappointment.

Abbott has joined British Prime Minister David Cameron and the so called leader of the free world, Barack Obama, as protectors and appeasers of Islam because their 'fundamental transformation' agenda requires it.

The rhetoric they all employ when absolving Islam from these atrocities, together with the soundbites and slogans they use, could have been written by the same spin doctor. Bearing in mind they were all together in Australia for the recent G8 jamboree they most likely were.

Despite the tens of thousands of innocents murdered in the name of Islam across the planet from Indonesia to Nigeria every year, they continue to trot out "the great global religion of peace" nonsense at every opportunity.

The Fort Hood atrocity, where Muslim terrorist Nadal Hasan murdered thirteen Americans in the name of Islam, is being referred to as "workplace violence". Hasan has recently asked ISIS to make him a citizen.

The Obama administration has decreed that the global war on terror be referred to as an "overseas contingency operation" supposedly to appease offended jihadis.

The latest attempt to distance the global Islamic community ( the Ummah) from the Muslim atrocities is by claiming the perpetrators are "lone wolves" who are "self starting" terrorists who, without help, "self radicalise" via the Internet.

This deliberate deception conveniently absolves the thousands of mosques and madrassas, with their imams, tribal elders and hate preachers, from any blame for the radicalisation of their congregations.

It also absolves the politicians themselves for allowing millions of backward, and in many cases illiterate tribal orientated immigrants, into their respective countries to form welfare funded, violent, self governing ghettos where radicalisation is allowed to fester unhindered.

They knew these unfortunates would not be able to integrate or accept the modern way of life of the host country. In fact they encouraged them not to integrate and to keep their often barbaric cultural practices under the guise of diversity and cultural enrichment for indigenous people.

It is worth reminding ourselves of some of the atrocities, many now forgotten, and deciding if they were carried out by "self radicalised lone wolves" as the politicians would have us believe, or deliberate acts of terrorism, meticulously planned and financed by ruthless organisations who operate with impunity inside western countries as well as the fifty two Muslim countries on the planet.

The 1998 United States Embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya. 214 killed.

The 2002 Bali bombings in Indonesia. 202 killed.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings. 191 killed.

The 2005 bombings on the London Transport System. 53 killed.

The 2008 bombings in New Delhi, India. 3 killed.

The co-ordinated attacks on the business district of Mumbai. 166 killed.

The 2013 bombing of the Boston marathon. 3 killed.

The 2013 murder of British soldier Lee Rigby in a London street.

The Westgate shopping mall attack, Nairobi, Kenya. 67 killed.

*Finally the largely forgotten the October 2014 attack on the war memorial and Parliament building in Ottowa, Canada and the New York subway hatchet attack on four New York police officers.

In conclusion, the radical Muslims who are currently butchering their way across the Middle East in the name of Allah and his prophet are creations of the western political leaders, they are obviously not lone wolves, self starters, self radicalised or anything else.

They are the product of the multi-cultural agenda which is being imposed on western countries by an out of control political class who listen to no one but themselves. No amount of spin, soundbites or PR generated slogans are going to absolve them of the responsibility for the bloodletting abroad or at home when their creations make good their threats


Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Mohammed Dundee - A New Icon For A New Transformed Australia

It wasn't too long ago that Australian men were humorously caricatured  by macho types like Paul Hogan's Crocodile Dundee and women by the politically incorrect Dame Edna Everage played by Barry Humphries. If these were accurate stereotypes of the generic Australian from a few decades ago they certainly don't apply today.

Like their kith and kin back in Mother England they have allowed their country to be transformed by a cabal of politically correct, self loathing, agenda driven 'progressives' to the point where killer Man Haron Monis would be more suitable as a caricature along with his charming partner Amira Droudis.

Although the Australian people have not quite reached the depths of despair being suffered by their counterparts in Great Britain, recent events indicate they are not too far behind.

After the horrific siege of the Lindt Cafe in Sydney was brought to an end with the loss of two innocent lives, we now face the undignified prospect of watching the politicians and their accessories in the establishment wriggle, spin and lie to absolve themselves of any blame.

While the civilised world express their condolences to the family and friends of the deceased, and many in the Muslim world, including Amira Droudis rejoice, the establishment are falling over themselves to absolve the wider world of Islam.

Before any inquiry is held or any empirical evidence is presented, the global media is already portraying the killer as a 'lone wolf'. How a lone wolf out on bail with a high media profile can procure a firearm is not explained.

While the world watches radical Muslims indulge in the most depraved savagery across the planet, and listen to the specific threats to bring this savagery to the civilised world, including Australia,  the New South Wales state police commissioner, Andrew Scipione, has already dismissed this well-planned outrage as "an isolated incident".

British Prime Minister David Cameron, a committed multi-culturalist and promoter of the moral equivalence of Islam, made a speech to the Australian Parliament just a matter of weeks ago explaining what steps he is taking to neutralise the tens of thousands of radical Muslims in his own country as they clamour to join the global jihad against civilisation. Without a hint of irony he went on to describe Islam as "a great global religion of peace".

As expected, his speech was widely acclaimed by his fellow politicians and the sycophantic hangers-on that hover around the fringes of the powerful like flies around a dead cat. They obviously don't follow the news or watch the horrific images of innocent men, women and children being tortured, maimed and beheaded in the name of Islam and its prophet on the Internet.

Referring to the Lindt Cafe siege and its tragic aftermath, David Cameron continued with the globally agreed 'lone wolf' theme and declared that Britain could suffer a similar attack "at any moment".

In a direct contradiction to his earlier 'great global religion of peace' nonsense, he went on to say that the outrage "demonstrates the terror threat all over the world".

Politicians like Cameron, who are totally dedicated to the UN/EU mandated creation of so called multi-cultural societies in the West, will continue to put the imposition of Islam and its practices above the safety and security of the British people.

Informed people will not be fooled by the PR manufactured platitudes Cameron trotted out before the House of Commons Liaison Committee yesterday.

Determined to absolve and protect the wider Ummah, he continued with the lone wolf theme and added the 'self starting' terrorists. These are people who are supposedly self radicalising using the Internet as opposed to deliberate radicalisation within the Ummah by hate preachers, imams and tribal elders.

Looking at what Cameron said to the Committee, and his contradictions, he clearly demonstrates either his complete ignorance of events both at home and abroad and their causes or his total dedication to the cultural replacement agenda at any cost.

"The tragedy may have been played out more than 10,000 miles away but it could be repeated in Britain".

He followed this with the equally ignorant statement:

"This is on the other side of the world but is the sort of thing that could just as well happen here in the UK or in Europe".

Since it already has happened in the UK and in Europe these statements are an insult to those who died and their loved ones. It is also a cynical attempt to portray the Sydney atrocity as a new development that needs radical action.

To remind the Prime Minister:

One hundred and ninety one innocent people were murdered and eighteen hundred injured by Muslim terrorists in Madrid, Spain 11th March 2004.

Fifty two innocent people were killed and seven hundred were injured by Muslim terrorists in London on the 7th July 2005.

Soldier Lee Rigby was murdered in horrific fashion on a London street in broad daylight by two Muslim terrorists 13th May 2013.

 In addition to these atrocities, carnage was avoided more by incompetence than government action on the 21st July 2005 when Muslim terrorists attempted to repeat the 7/7 bombers on the London transport system.

Richard Reid, known as the shoe bomber, attempted to commit mass murder by blowing up an airliner 22 December 2001.

Umar Abdulmutallab, known as the underwear bomber, similarly attempted mass murder on an airliner on 25th December 2009.

There are anywhere between five hundred and two thousand British documented Muslims (Cameron's government has no idea of the exact number) fighting the global jihad against civilization in hot spots around the world including Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan and Yemen.

None of these savages, including Jihadi John from London, were lone wolves nor were they self starting terrorists who self radicalised using the Internet. They were part of the Ummah who interpret the words of their prophet as written in their holy book the Koran and as taught by their spiritual leaders at their local mosque or madrassa.

If Cameron and the other political leaders were serious about tackling Muslim terrorism they would:

Stop mass immigration from backward Muslim countries forthwith.

Stop giving in to demands that require the British people to conform to Islam.

Stop handing out British passports to people from backward countries who cannot integrate.

There is no justification for thousands of madrassas and mosques in Great Britain. They should be closed with immediate effect.

Radical preachers should prosecuted under the same hate laws that everyone else is subject to and imprisoned before deportation.

Assistance to emigrate to a Muslim country of their choice should be given to anyone wanting a caliphate or sharia law, including the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). That choice being made, their citizenship or visas should be revoked to prevent their return.

In conclusion it must be stated categorically that the atrocities listed above including the tragedy in Sydney are the direct result of the political class opening the borders to mass immigration as part of their cultural replacement agenda.

Promises of future action to deal with Muslim terrorists is no longer acceptable, immediate radical action is required.

This is Cameron's and the political elite's agenda not the people's; they must take responsibility for past bloodshed and they will be held responsible for bloodshed in the future.

Friday, December 12, 2014

Russell Brand - Sex, Drugs And Socialist Hypocrisy

It should come as no surprise to even the most casual observer that the media attention given to the views of chemically damaged celebrities such as Russell Brand has taken political discourse to abysmal levels of puerility.

Whether this is a deliberate policy to match the plummeting intellectual level of the electorate, or as a precursor to giving the vote to impressionable, celebrity obsessed sixteen year old kids, is a matter of debate. What is indisputable is the fact that the political views of celebrities like Brand are getting ever more prominence in the bought-and-paid-for media despite being manufactured and blatantly hypocritical.

Whenever there is an opportunity to push the 'progressive' agenda, especially where there is a celebrity involved, the taxpayer funded BBC can be relied upon to oblige. Despite being a phony with a reputation for imbecilic behavior and deranged ranting, he was invited to participate in Question Timeone of their flagship political programmes.

Brand is a self confessed drug and sex addict who's money making activities revolve around 'alternative' comedy, juvenile pranks and general anti-social behavior. Over time this has become stale, predictable and decidedly unfunny. His business managers together with his PR team and image consultants are having to change his public activities in order to keep the money rolling in.

As skilled as PR teams are in this age of spin and media management, his managers have got a challenge on their hands trying to transform an immature, drug addled narcissist into a serious political commentator.

Their efforts so far have consisted of a book of his thoughts, childishly referred to as his Booky Wookies, together with some incoherent, anti-establishment rants. These have been supplemented with some choreographed publicity stunts protesting against the economic system he uses to accumulate his personal wealth.

Russell Brand's money making machine have adopted the same tried and tested strategy used by wealthy celebrities the world over in order keep their client in the public eye thus maximising his revenue generating potential.

By attempting to identify their client with the poor and downtrodden and falsely adopting a political philosophy which involves equality of outcome and redistribution of wealth, Brand and his business managers show themselves up for the cynical, money grubbing exploiters they really are.

This kind of radical chic allows us, the informed public, to laugh at celebrities like Sean Penn who spouts solidarity with the working class and hob nobs with socialist tyrants like Hugo Chavez from atop a multi-million dollar personal fortune.

Russell Brand thinks we don't see the hypocrisy of extremely wealthy celebrities like George Clooney, Ben Afflick or Robert Redford, who make millions for making a single movie, talking about income inequality at a thirty thousand dollar per plate fund raising dinner for a socialist party.

Brand of course is no George Clooney or Robert Redford but he does share their penchant for radical chic and socialist hypocrisy while in pursuit of personal riches.

What his supporters, the BBC and the rest of the bought-and-paid-for media should take into account is the fact that Brand's brain has been damaged by drug abuse which could explain his deranged ramblings along with his eccentric and juvenile behavior.

I am not sure what constitutes a sex addict but I assume it is also detrimental to his mental well being. As a drug abuser he is addicted to narcotics whereby any craving can be satiated by a visit to his drug dealer. As a sex addict it depends on what he is attracted to before a craving can be satisfied.

Women would be the obvious choice but in a drug induced stupor it could men, farmyard animals, inanimate objects or perhaps a self administered five knuckle shuffle would suffice. One report indicated Brand had an encounter with a man in a public toilet which he put down to research or something, but either way it cannot have helped with his mental equilibrium.

It is the opinion of many impartial observers that whatever his problems or proclivities may be, it should be obvious to the media and the public at large that drug abuse and his sex addiction have affected his mental stability.

This may excuse his deranged rantings and eccentric behavior but his venture into the realm of revolutionary politics may very well be a part of a re-branding exercise designed to attract publicity and keep the revenue rolling in.

Like all celebrity socialists Brand takes it out on the messenger when confronted with his hypocrisy as he did with a rant at a Channel 4 reporter who questioned his sincerity during a recent rent protest in London.

Other Russell Brand imbecilities can be found here.

Whatever his business managers and image consultants come up with to attract publicity and keep the revenues rolling in, he is no revolutionary and never will be. There may be a passing resemblance but Brand's phony revolutionary beliefs lack the reality, conviction and commitment of a real revolutionary.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Victoria's Secret Lingerie - Female Emancipation Or Exploitation?

It didn't come as much of a surprise that the resounding success of Victoria's Secret Fashion Show London 2014 brought out the usual band of critics, spoil sports and dreary curmudgeons that disapprove of everything and anything that can be enjoyed by people whatever it may be.

These critics are so wrapped up in themselves and their so called 'progressive' opinions they must lead lives that are utterly devoid of any form of enjoyment, fun or pleasure.

They disapprove of, and campaign against, any source of enjoyment including sugar, salt, fizzy drinks, booze, the food of your choice, smoking ( now including e-cigarettes ) motoring, gambling, horse racing, fishing, contact sports, competitive sports and now modelling lingerie.

An article by Sarah Vine in the Daily Mail sums up the attitude of the 'progressive' establishment toward a show that was nothing more than group young ladies striding down a catwalk wearing a popular line in underwear.

According to the obviously envious Vine this "fashion show suggests trashy costumes, strippers, nudity and lecherousness are the most natural things in the world".

According to the more unbiased, casual observer like myself, the lingerie was far from trashy, there were no strippers or nudity and admiring the well toned form of beautiful women modelling clothes is perfectly natural as opposed to lecherous.

Sarah Vine also laments that a show such as this is undoing fifty years of feminism. Its a matter of opinion whether fifty years of feminism means women are free to make personal choices about their femininity as opposed to being forced into adopting more gender neutral persona's as epitomised by herself or ultra feminist Germain Greer.

While the interfering busy bodies of the nanny state are hectoring the public and organising bans on foods they disapprove of to combat the so called obesity epidemic, Sarah Vines is sneering at the diet the girls employ to keep their bodies in prime condition.

While the government and busy bodies like Vine bemoan the sedentary lifestyle that contributes to the poor health of the nations young people, she criticises and sneers at exercise regimes used by the girls to keep fit and healthy.

As she herself admits the girls, like top class athletes, have a limited career and earning capacity, therefore cashing in on their personal assets while they can should be perfectly understandable.

These ladies would be fools not to, or maybe they should pass up the chance to make the millions they do in order to stay true to the feminist cause as espoused by Sarah Vine.

Sarah Vine and the rest of the overt feminist movement have made their stash so they really shouldn't sneer or deny these young ladies the opportunity to set themselves up for life.

It might be difficult for feminist bigots like Vine to understand but women making the personal choice to make a fortune by modelling lingerie is an example of female emancipation as opposed to the degrading exploitation she makes it out to be.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Terrorist Attack Inevitable - Government Ramps Up Mass Immigration

Some news items are so disturbing one has to re-read them several times to understand how the conditions arose for such things to happen. At first glance the severity of a story can mask its origins but a little focus and analysis usually reveals the cause. That cause would be politicians making illogical, irrational or incompetent decisions that fly in the face of common sense.

The current leaders of the British political pack have availed themselves of the most exclusive and expensive education money can buy. They went on to some of the best universities in the world including Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard.

Their handlers and groomers then fast tracked them into lobbying companies, merchant banks, the UN, the EU or the BBC for a few years, before bringing them to rest in the party political machines they dwell in today.

One would think that somewhere along this education super-highway they would have acquired some common sense to foresee some of the the consequences of their policies then take the appropriate action.

A look around the current news cycle and their response should dispel that notion once and for all.

i) 'Police and security officials state categorically that a Muslim terrorist attack on Great Britain is inevitable'.
(Story here)

No sh*t Sherlock is the remark that comes immediately to mind. The 7/7 and 21/7 terrorists attacks on the London Transport system must have slipped the governments mind, along with the brutal murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in a London street in broad daylight.

The government have allowed Muslim ghettos to spread and radical Islam fester unhindered in mosques and madrassas the length and breadth of the country. They indulge their every demand no matter how minor or how objectionable to the British people. This has emboldened them to make more and even bigger demands such as everyone must submit to Islam and sharia law or else.

ii) 'British documented Muslim brothers have been sent to prison for attending terrorist training camps in Syria'.

Only someone without an ounce of foresight can actually countenance the response of the political establishment to this. Mohommod and Hamza Nawaz shared an extremist ideology and made their way to Syria via Calais, Lyon, Istanbul and Ankara, for the purpose of jihad.

In a statement of jaw dropping naivety,  the judge said that the pair  "who are British of Pakistani origin, did not plan to carry out attacks in the UK and that their ambition was to join extremists fighting against the Syrian regime". He therefore gave them derisory four and three year sentences, which with the customary fifty percent reduction they could be out in eighteen months to two years.

Are they harmless bumbling amateurs looking to impress their peers as their defence lawyer suggests?  Not quite, by travelling abroad, Mohommod Nawaz breached the terms of a licence after he was jailed for six years in 2009 for blackmail, false imprisonment, kidnap and wounding.
(Story here)

iii) 'British ex-soldiers volunteering to fight the Islamic State could be prosecuted for murder'.

Only British politicians and their establishment can offer rehabilitation and monitoring to some of the most brutal savages on the planet who, prior to their return 'home', have committed some of the most horrific crimes imaginable but threaten prosecution to those who volunteer to go fight them.
iv) 'British Muslim jihadi taunts police and MI5 on Twitter from the Islamic State in Syria'.

Siddhartha Dhar from London was one of nine men who were detained on suspicion of supporting terrorism. He is believed to have met and possibly mentored Michael Adebolajo, one of the brutal killers of Drummer Rigby.
In an incomprehensible act that defies logic, Dhar was released on bail and ordered to hand in his passport. Less than twenty four hours later he's on his way to Syria with his entire family where he Tweets photographs of himself with an assault rifle and his new born son to the police and the intelligence services.
(Story here)

v) 'A gang who battered a dad in front of his family were convicted Polish thugs who were allowed to stroll into the UK'.
Professor Paul Kohler suffered appalling injuries during a robbery at his home by four violent career criminal thugs. The thugs in question had a history of extreme violence and the ring leader was on the run from a Polish prison.

They saw Great Britain's wealthy suburbs as a soft touch but the softest touch of all were the customs and immigration 'service' who let them stroll across the border without question.
(Story here)
And finally, as anyone with just the minutest skills of observation will attest, the root cause of all these news items is the governments EU mandated policy of open border mass immigration.

One would think that taking control of the borders would be the first of a multitude steps that would be necessary to relieve the suffering of the British people.

vi) Despite a 'no ifs, no buts' cast iron promise by David Cameron to limit net immigration to the tens of thousands, it is at its highest level since the Norman invasion of William the Conquerer in 1066.

The latest figures released yesterday revealed that five hundred and eighty three thousand people immigrated onto this tiny windswept island in the North Atlantic last year, with a net increase of two hundred and sixty thousand.
(Story here)

The strain on the country's physical and social infrastructure is unsustainable let on its finances and community relations. The government and its army of like minded officials in the establishment absolutely refuse to listen to people and address these issues. This is because they have surrendered the power to govern Great Britain to the unelected, unaccountable, unsackable EU bureaucrats in Brussels.

News items such as these are a daily occurrence and the tip of the iceberg, unless appropriate action is taken to end the suffering of the British people it will end in tears.


Tuesday, November 25, 2014

UN Imposed Multi-Culturalism - Civilisation Itself Is Diminished

When United Nations super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland appeared on the BBC some time ago and  talked about the need for the European Union to 'undermine national homogeneity', one cannot be sure that the viewing public, let alone the public at large, realised the enormity of what he was saying.

A former head honcho at BP and Goldman-Sachs, he appeared under the guise of the UN sponsored Global Forum on Migration and Development. Like the modern day professional politician, it is unlikely that career bureaucrats such as himself has spent any quality time in the real world of the people who suffer the consequences of what they impose.  

In the minds of Sutherland and the global elite, all the problematic conditions that resulted in conflict and two world wars stemmed from the hegemony of what used to be known in leftist circles as the WASP,  the White Anglo Saxon Protestant. The usual buzzwords such as imperialism, colonialism, nationalism, inequality and the like, would all be laid at the door of the WASP.

WASP morphed into an catch-all term used to describe all people who were white with a Judaeo-Christian heritage.

With the growing influence and power of the UN came the global super bureaucrat of whom Peter Sutherland is the latest manifestation. What started as a noble effort for the worlds nations to take action in preventing wars, the UN as effectively abandoned this noble ideal and now sees itself as the world government.

What we are seeing today is the ongoing UN project to re-order the post-war world according to their vision alone, excluding everyone from outside their exclusive circle.

'Un-homogenising' as they like to call it, consists of replacing the traditional ways of life of WASP dominated cultures with so called 'multi-cultural societies'.

It has already been achieved in South Africa and Zimbabwe with disastrous consequences and it is well advanced in the Anglosphere. It is currently being imposed in Europe with equally disastrous consequences.

With two years left of his final term, President Obama is determined to finish 'fundamentally transforming' America by destroying the WASP dominated heritage of the American people. He is doing this with all the intensity of a scorched earth policy.

The borders are deliberately left open, illegal immigration is actively encouraged with amnesty and citizenship being the ultimate reward.

From five to a possible eleven million new non WASP citizens is tranformational in the extreme.

Career politicians and professional bureaucrats spend their lives in each others company, only interacting with like minded people who can comprehend a particular theory, a political philosophy or a policy and niothing else. Consequently they know very little about the real world inhabited by real  people who will suffer the practical reality of what they impose.

If they do understand the practical reality of what they impose then obviously they don't care, their re-ordering of global society is all that matters. The ending of white rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe was the aim of the UN regardless of the disastrous consequences they knew would befall the people.

The fact that the so called multi-cultural 'Rainbow Nation' has descended into a hellhole of tribalism, poverty, starvation, violence, rape and murder is of no consequence to people like Sutherland and the political elite. As long as the project to end white rule was achieved, then all's well that ends well.
Likewise in Zimbabwe with the installation of 'Butcher' Bob Mugabe, the UN's favourite Marxist dictator. The country, together its industries, its economy and its peace, has been totally destroyed but that's ok at least the white man is longer in charge.

Civilisation in South Africa and Zimbabwe has not been advanced by UN action but diminished.

The chosen method for 'undermining national homogeinty' in Europe is to impose a mythical 'multi-cultural society' via open border mass immigration combined with rigidly policed political correctness and anti-indigenate laws.

Some laws, such as hate crime laws, equality laws, animal welfare laws and child protection laws are selective, applying to indigenes only.
Since it is a practical impossibility to raise living and cultural standards in some parts of the world up to WASP levels, Sutherland and global elite are imposing global finacial and cultural equality by:

a) Redistributing wealth by a combination of foreign or development aid.

b) Transferring manfacturing industries and technology to the third world via the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO)

c) Redistributing wealth using the goverment sponsored perversion of science called Man Made Global Warming. Since there hasn't been any for two decades they shamelessly re-named it 'Combating Climate Change' and carried on redistributing taxpayers money regardless.

d) Instigating a cultural and demographic replacement policy by encouraging open border mass immigration from backward, incompatible cultures. These cultures are encouraged not to integrate while the indigenous population are cohersed into accepting them, together with some of their barbaric practices, under threat of prosecution.

With the 'un-homogenising' of Great Britain being the prime objective - as opposed to the wellbeing of the people - Peter Sutherland and the global elite will not be the slightest bit concerned that their so called multi-cultural society consists of thousands of mono-cultural, violent, crime ridden, welfare financed ghettoes that are unrecognisable as being British.


As is the case in Southern Africa, British society, along with its civilsed culture and its benign way of life has been downgraded and diminished so that career politicians and agenda driven professional bureaucrats can feel self satisfied that their 'progressive' re-ordering of the world is being achieved regardless of the cost to civilised standards.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Politicians v The People - The Battle Of Britain Rages On

Having recently marked the centenary of the start of World War I and attended services on Remembrance Sunday honouring those who made the ultimate sacrifice for Great Britain's freedom, one would think that the British people would be enjoying the fruits of that sacrifice without hindrance.

Then one couldn't be more wrong. Malign forces both at home and abroad made the decision that the independent nation states of Europe, Great Britain included, must be abolished and replaced by a post democratic federal super state - in effect a United States of Europe.

This was unacheivable with the various cultures and traditional ways of life of the individual nation states, therefore these had to be destroyed in order to form a new generic European citizen.

This grandiose project would never have got off the ground had there been a consultation process or a referendum, therefore it was decided to impose it by stealth and coercion.

The initial stage in the deception was the Common Market. Once trapped inside this supposedly benign organisation morphing it into a sovereign state was relatively straight forward.

By implementing the Jean Monnet plan, sovereignty was transferred from the nation states to Brussels by deceit using a series of treaties each carefully disguised as being of mutual economic benefit. By the time the people became aware of the dastardly and thoroughly dishonest plan it was too late.

In parallel with the transfer of sovereignty, national cultures and traditional ways of life were being systematically destroyed using an open border mass immigration policy. This was coupled with coercion, anti-indigent legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness.

To effect this cultural vandalism on the British people - who incidentally, didn't ask for it, weren't consulted about it and didn't want it - it became necessary for the political class to declare war on their own people.

The political establishment and the traditional institutions, together with their armies of bureaucrats, apparatchiks and sycophants, have been stuffed with Common Purpose graduates who have been specifically trained to impose the EU project together with its cultural replacement agenda.

The individual behaviors of this enemy within is too enormous to include in this article but to give an idea of how dedicated they are, a look at the last news cycle speaks volumes.

The British people demand an end to open border mass immigration. Despite solemn promises 'to reduce net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands' it continues relentlessly upwards. The latest figures show it remains in the hundreds of thousands. Those who voice their consternation are smeared as racist, xenophobes, Islamophobes or Little Englanders.

With all the indecent haste they can muster, in order to alter the cultural profile of Great Britain permanently, the politicians handed out British passports with abandon. Some two hundred thousand last year with no decrease projected any time soon. This action will also allow the multi-culturalists to re-define what comprise British values.

The school inspection regime who labour under the grandiose title of the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (OfSTED), refused to correctly grade a school in the rural English town of Market Rasen because it isn't sufficiently multi-cultural. In other words its too English. The fact the town is ninety seven percent white English doesn't register with these fanatics.

To these bureaucrats white Anglo-Saxon England is the perceived enemy they are working to destroy.
To reinforce the point that Muslims are a vitally important part of the cultural replacement agenda, and therefore deserving of special treatment, West Midlands police applied to the courts to keep the identity of a Muslim grooming gang secret to protect their human rights.

One would have thought that the ongoing grooming scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and every other English city, where the police facilitated industrial scale child abuse by Muslim paedophile gangs, they would have been more sensitive. Apparently not, the multi-cultural agenda takes a much higher priority over the wellbeing young white girls.

The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, a Mr. Ed Davey, from the ever more ludicrous Liberal Democrat Party, insults anyone who objects to the government fire hosing taxpayers money on foreign vanity projects.

Such is the contempt Mr. Davey has for the British public, questioning the policy of borrowing and spending upwards of ten billion pounds per year on foreign aid when the the national debt is soaring inexorably skyward makes one a 'Little Englander'.

Finally, Labour Party big wig and Shadow Attorney General Emily Thornberry, tweeted a photograph of a white van parked outside a house adorned with the flag of St George as if it was some kind of abomination. (White van man is a demographic group within the working class)

It may not appear to be an issue of consequence until one realises that in the eyes of the wealthy, metropolitan elite that has taken over the working mans party, the Cross of St. George is on the list of proscribed items because it causes offence to foreigners.

Taking offence at anything quintessentially English forms part of the mindset of the self loathing socialist/communist/liberal community that has declared war on the British people. In case anyone is unfamiliar with current terminology, these are the people that now go around calling themselves 'progressives'.

As in all wars the battles rage to and fro but this particular one ends on a positive note which gives rise to some optimism.

Thornberry's remarks were made during the Rochester and Strood by-election campaign which was subsequently won by the anti-establishment, anti-EU  United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP),
the second such by-election victory in as many months.

As for the remote, Great Britain hating, metropolitan champagne socialist Emily Thornberry?  Her ignorance and ongoing war against the British people has attracted opprobium all round resulting in her resignation from the Labour Shadow Cabinet. This hopefully will be the final nail in the coffin of Red Ed and his elitist controlled Labour Party.