Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Islamic State - Cameron Loses The Plot Along With His Marbles

The British people are beginning to wonder what it is with their Prime Minister that compels him to cave in to every Muslim demand no matter how trivial or ridiculous. In the face of the ever growing hostility between the real British citizen and the imported anti-British Muslim community, David Cameron always comes down on the side of his most favoured client group.

To make matters worse he often chastises the real British people for their non acceptance of the alien way of life which all and sundry treat as incompatible with their own Judeo-Christian heritage. By insinuating that those who disagree with his own stance are bigots and Islamophobes, Cameron is using the same dirty tactics as the 'progressive' left such as demonisation and smear.

Cameron - along with his cronies and the like minded 'progressive' activists that are committed to imposing 'multi-culturalism' - must be the only one left in the country who is still pushing the "religion of peace" nonsense with reference to Islam.

Bearing in mind that Muslims comprise only four percent of the total population, one has to wonder whether Cameron has lost the plot, along with his sanity, with his latest order that the BBC "stop calling IS an Islamic State".

Regardless of the support among British Muslims for the Islamic State, he is concerned that they will 'recoil' at the phrase being used to justify the 'perversion of a great religion'.

In other words, on planet Cameron, Muslims will be offended by using the word 'Islamic' to describe the Islamic State which is called for by Mohammad and written in the Koran.

Incidentally, one would think that with all the taxpayer funded spin doctors that Cameron employs to stop him sounding like an idiot in public they would have explained to him that the abbreviation ISIL that he uses to describe the Islamic State means 'the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant'.

Cameron completely loses the plot when he explains that "saying ISIL is better than using Islamic State because it is in my view neither Islamic nor a state".

Roughly translated for those of us on planet earth who may be confused: Cameron is saying that the Muslim community will not 'recoil' or be offended if he uses an abbreviation for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in place of Islamic State because the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is different to the Islamic State which is neither Islamic nor a state. Got that? If not that's too bad because it only gets worse.

Without consulting the wider British public - they can now be ignored as the general election was over on May 7th -  the political class from all parties have jumped on the 'progressive' bandwagon by joining the Prime Minister in his call for the BBC to stop using the term 'Islamic State' to describe the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

To spare the relatively small Muslim community from offence and to prevent any further radicalisation of an already radicalised community, Honourable Members of Parliament are pushing the BBC, along with the government-media complex and the public at large, into using the term 'Daesh' in place of Islamic State, IS, ISIS or ISIL.

Daesh is a term based on an Arab acronym: al-Dawra al-Islamiya fil Iraq wa'al Sham which translates into...........Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (Syria).

Only in the remote, dysfunctional world of the political class is such insane behaviour treated as normal; not only has David Cameron lost the plot along with his marbles, so has the entire government, the establishment, the BBC and anyone else that lends them credence.

Due to this appalling behavior by the out-of-touch political class I will refer from now on to the blood drenched, barbaric state being set up by Muslims, many of them documented citizens of Great Britain, as the Islamic State regardless of any offence that may be taken.

Meanwhile in the real world - the one inhabited by real people who suffer the real consequences of imposed multi-culturalism  and enrichment- young white girls are still being groomed, gang raped and pimped out by David Cameron's most indulged client group who can do no wrong.

Mosques and madrassas are still being built despite local opposition, hate preachers remain on the streets extolling the virtues of the Islamic State and openly recruiting for ISIS. Volunteers, young and old, male and female, continue to make their way to Syria to fulfill the calling of Allah and Mohammad as written in the Koran.

It doesn't bother the politicians that Great Britain's capital city, once the epicenter of a proud nation, is now increasingly referred to as Londonistan; as a matter of fact they seem rather proud of it.

It would be interesting to hear what excuses the politicians have for the eighty percent of London's Muslims who support ISIS or the one tenth of all Londoners that view the Islamic State favourably.

Worryingly, support for ISIS is greatest among the under-25's. These are not as the political class would have us believe, young, impressionable youths who were radicalised by social media and the Internet, they are born and bred adherents to a cult that worships death like civilised people worship life.

All one has to do is read their holy book; far from being the religion of peace that the politicians claim it is, Muslims are taught from birth that every non-Muslim is inferior, an infidel that must be dominated or killed.

(Get your copy here for free)

In conclusion it is worth reiterating that Cameron along with the political class and the establishment are putting their cultural replacement agenda before the safety and well being of the British people with the result that there will be even more blood on their hands than there is now after the 7/7 bombings and the brutal killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby.

Don't miss A Snivelling Prime Minister by The Mellow Jihadi

Monday, June 29, 2015

Jurassic World - Political Life Imitating Art Also Causes Havoc And Mayhem

"Life Imitates Art Far More Than Art Imitates Life" - Oscar Wilde

On a lighter note, the ancient philosophical discussion about whether art imitates life or life imitates art has finally been put to rest by the latest box office blockbuster Jurassic World.

Without giving too much away, the fourth in the Jurassic Park series of movies centers on a theme park populated with cloned dinosaurs where the star attraction is a creature named Indominus Rex. 

This monster has been created using the DNA of several predatory dinosaurs mixed with that of modern day animals. Velociraptors, the intelligent and calculating stars of the previous Jurassic movies have been trained to accept Indominus as their alpha.

Inevitably Indominus escapes causing havoc and mayhem and leaving death and destruction its wake.

The highly successful series can be considered art encompassing several disciplines including script writing, acting and visual presentation.

It doesn't take a giant leap in imagination to see that this scenario is happening in the present day political world. Since democracy has been reduced to nothing more than a ballot every few years it has allowed a small elite who mindlessly pursue political power in order to dominate others to pervert the process.

Looking at the modern political world one should be forgiven for seeing the parallels with the artistic world of the film creators. A group of politicians has been created by the power brokers who are so alike they could be clones sharing the same DNA.

With the removal of honesty and integrity from the electoral process politicians have been indoctrinated with the same disciplines as the movie industry such as script writing, acting and visual presentation. These fakes look the same, they talk the same, they behave in the same manner, they use the same publicity tricks to con the public into believing they care.

Nothing could be further from the truth; once these clones have been let loose on an unsuspecting world they cause havoc and mayhem, leaving death and destruction in their wake.

Despite a population of some three hundred and fifty million, the best the American people can come up with are dinosaurs in the form of a sixty-seven year old Hillary Clinton and seventy-four year old Bernie Sanders; should these two front runners trip up along the campaign trail then seventy-two year old Joe Biden or sixty-six year old Elizabeth Warren are waiting in the wings.

In truth it doesn't matter which one is chosen, they can only offer the modern political equivalent of a primeval swamp i.e socialism. Like the dinosaurs of the Jurassic era these people do not have the brain capacity to think outside of their instinctive behavior, thus even though socialism continually fails wherever it is imposed, its all they have to offer.

On the British side of the pond things are no better. The choices for leader of the Labour Party after Red Ed Miliband's epic failure at the last election are straight out of the Dipshitodocus enclosure.

Andy Burnham, who has earned himself the moniker of 'Body Bags' Burnham after presiding over the unnecessary deaths of twelve hundred patients at the Mid Staffs NHS trust while he was Minister of Health.

Yvette Cooper, the other half of the husband and wife team comprising herself and Ed Balls. Both Secretaries of State for the disastrous Blair/Brown governments which engineered the bankruptcy of the British economy, the catastrophic drop in educational standards and the mass immigration disaster.

Jeremy Corbyn, a hardline socialist from the old school who is so off the scale he boasts friendship with the Hamas and Hezbollah leadership.

Liz Kendall, without a care for the disaster that was visited upon the British people by her mentor, she is touting herself as a 'Blairite', the fabulously wealthy former Labour leader who famously claimed that "he came to socialism via Marxism".

Unfortunately, the people on both sides of the pond who continue to vote these people into office have not evolved beyond the Neanderthal stage and have not yet developed the intelligence to see beyond the tips of the flint spearheads.

All us Homo Sapiens can do is to hope that human evolution speeds up so that the Neanderthal voters become extinct and take the political dinosaurs with them.


Thursday, June 25, 2015

British ISIS Killers Are Radicalised At Home From Birth

                                           "I don't want my daughters to grow up in England"

                                          "I don't like the UK, it's becoming more like America"

                                           "I don't want my children growing up in this society"

                                         I want to live in Saudi Arabia because I don't like the UK"

These statements are attributed to thirty three-year old Zorah Dawood who left our green and pleasant land to take up residence with ISIS in Syria along with her two children aged five and eight.

She was accompanied by her two sisters Khadija aged thirty and Sugra aged thirty-four along with their combined brood aged three to fifteen.
(Full story here)

These ISIS supporters join the hundreds if not thousands of other British documented Muslims who despise the British people and reject utterly the British way of life, making their way to Syria in order to fulfill their destiny and the requirements of their prophet.

The attitude of the government and the establishment, including the police and the BBC, is indicative of the yawning chasm that exists between them and the majority of the British people they are supposed to serve.

Time and again when news that more Muslim males, females or families have gone missing from their mono-cultural ghettos, the government along with the police and the BBC 'fear' for their safety or 'fear' that they are heading to Syria to join the caliphate.

In truth there is a mutual disdain bordering on hatred between these two incompatible cultures whereby the vast majority of the British people don't 'fear' their disappearance at all, instead they bid them good luck, bon voyage and good riddance.

It is now generally accepted that the government and the establishment are using the Muslim community as a battering ram to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on an unwilling people on behalf of their masters in the EU/UN.

This deliberate policy manifests itself in a Statute Book full of hate crime legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness that makes it virtually impossible to voice criticism, or any form of disagreement, for fear of prosecution.

In addition to this cordon of protection they have thrown around their client community the government and their agents continue to ignore reality by making excuses for the so called radicalisation of these ISIS volunteers.

When one looks in detail at the issue of British documented volunteers joining ISIS, it becomes obvious that the government is forced to make these excuses or else admit that the Muslim communities have not evolved away from the medieval desert death cult that is articulated in the Koran and are therefore incompatible with the British way of life.

The government claim that these jihadis were normal British citizens like any other then suddenly became blood thirsty savages by radicalising themselves using the Internet and social media.

The parents and families of these jihadis plead ignorance about radicalisation and have the temerity to blame the government and the police for not doing enough to prevent their offspring leaving to join ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

The excuses offered by David Cameron's former Cabinet member, Baroness Warsi, are risible beyond believe; it's no wonder she is regarded as an abject failure who was appointed on the basis of being a non-white Muslim woman (her words not mine) as opposed to merit.

Ignoring the fact that Great Britain's Muslim community is the most indulged in the land, Warsi has the gall to claim that the government has a deliberate policy of non-engagement with Muslims. She uses her standard accusation that any criticism of Islam is 'far right'.

Her nonsense was in response to a letter sent to mosques and Muslim organisations that rightly urged them to do more to root out terrorism following the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris.

It's worth noting for Warsi's benefit that forty nine percent of her 3.4 million strong Muslim community endorse hate preachers, twenty seven percent support the Charlie Hebdo massacre and eleven percent support jihad.

 Also, ignoring the antics of the notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary who, incidentally, is allowed to preach his filth and act as a recruiting agent for ISIS without fear of arrest, she claims that the government has 'failed to tackle Islamophobic language and hate crimes'.

(Watch Choudary harass a police officer over a Help for Heroes wristband here)

In reality, British Muslims are born and raised to be radical; not only is radical Islam in their genes it is reinforced every day of their lives by their culture and the religion they are subservient to and from which there is no escape.

The lady quoted at the start of this article along with her siblings are not immature, impressionable school kids, they are wives and mothers in their early and mid-thirties who have lived their lives in a free and open society.

The sad fact is that due to the requirements of the misogynistic cult they have been forced to follow they have not been allowed to participate in British life; instead they have been taught from birth that Great Britain is evil and must be subjugated or destroyed.

It is obvious from her second comment that Ms. Dawood has also been brought up to believe that America is the great Satan and Great Britain his willing apprentice. What kind of woman in the year 2015 would prefer to live in Saudi Arabia, or war torn Syria, as opposed to the United States of America or Great Britain?

The fact these women had taken their children, one only three years old, on a religious pilgrimage to Medina in Saudi Arabia, where non-Muslims are not allowed because they are regarded as infidels and therefore evil and unclean, confirms indoctrination of hate from childhood.

In conclusion it has to be said that these children, like all the other children who inhabit the thousands of mono-cultural, shariah controlled Muslim ghettos in Great Britain, are radicalised from birth and and it is unbecoming of the British government to claim otherwise.

Monday, June 22, 2015

Cameron's U-Turn On Immigrants But Where Can He Put Them All?

The capitulation over immigrant quotas by British Prime Minister David Cameron to the bureaucrats that run the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN) came as no surprise to the long suffering British people.

Policy u-turns and broken promises have become a feature of Cameron's premiership and serve as evidence that he does not have the authority to govern Great Britain because of his declared subservience to the supranational EU/UN world government wannabees.

No sooner than Cameron announces some policy initiative that puts the people's interest above that of the EU/UN or merely articulates the view of the majority of his citizens, some Brussels bureaucrat or European leader will publicly chastise him forcing a surrender. If that European leader happens to be German Chancellor Angela Merkel, his surrender is made in double quick time and is total.

What happened to the Bulldog spirit that saw the British people initially stand alone against the Kaiser and Hitler then go on to win two world wars remains a mystery.

This indomitable spirit, personified by Sir Winston Churchill, seems to be totally absent from David Cameron's government along with his like minded hangers-on and cronies; love her or loath her even the handbag swinging Margaret Thatcher had more cajones than all of this lot put together.

The media devoted disproportional column inches and air time to boosting Cameron's image by highlighting his stand against EU/UN quotas of refugees crossing Mediterranean into Europe using some obscure 'opt-out' clause.

The same prominence was not given to his sly u-turn which came to light when he announced that Great Britain would take in several hundred more refugees in addition to the quota he was supposedly fighting against.

(It's worth noting that his announcement, which will have severe repercussions for the British people, was made in Slovakia and not the British Parliament. This demonstrates not only Cameron's contempt for the British people but his contempt for democracy itself)

Assuming the dastardly deed is done and thousands more immigrants will be added to the half million that enter an overcrowded and creaking Great Britain legally and illegally every year, it is imperative that Cameron informs the people where and how he proposes to house and provide for them.

The British economy remains bankrupt and there is a dire shortage of jobs, housing, school places, transportation, and health care provision. Rough sleeping by homeless immigrants has reached record levels and stretches from London in the east to Cornwall in the west.

To give some idea of the size of the problem, the police were called recently to a brawl taking place in a two bedroom mid-terrace house in Oldham only to find twenty immigrant Romanians living there.

It's worth reminding ourselves that the multi-millionaire acting/celebrity fraternity led by award winning actress Emma Thompson recently demanded that Cameron accept more Syrian immigrants into Great Britain without informing the people where they should be housed, fed and watered or who is going to pick up the tab.

Since Thompson also campaigned against a Tesco superstore being built near one of her residences on the grounds that it would ruin the 'villagey atmosphere' and the poorly paid staff would not 'fit in' with the local people, we can assume these desperate refugees won't be housed in her neighbourhood.
(Emma Thompson hypocrisy here and here)

The appalling attitude displayed by Emma Thompson is not unique and seems to be prevalent among those who make the most noise about compassion toward immigrants and refugees. More often than not they live in exclusive areas that have not suffered the negative consequences of the mass immigration policies they advocate.

They preach incessantly about celebrating diversity, cultural enrichment, shared values and the benefits of living in a so called 'multi-cultural society' but they do it from oases of affluent, exclusively white communities far away from the desert of alien mono-cultural ghettos they have created.

The following is a solution to the problem of refugees and economic migration which I am sure all those that have had their communities and lives blighted by mass immigration will wholeheartedly endorse.

Direct all these Mediterranean immigrants and refugees firstly to other countries in the middle east that share their religion and who are wealthy and without conflict. Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and Abu Dhabi to name but a few.

Secondly to those areas in Great Britain who's residents call for it or who vote for political parties that champion the benefits of mass immigration and multi-culturalism.

We can start with Emma Thompson's home town of West Hampstead in addition to the quiet haven of Dunoon, Scotland where her holiday residence is located.

David Cameron's constituency of Witney, Oxfordshire, which includes the charming, quintessentially English towns of Chipping Norton, Burford and Charlbury. The constituency boasts a population that is made up of 93% White British, 4.3% White Other, 1.4% Asian and only 0.4% Black. Hardly an advertisement for diversity or the boundless benefits of multi-culturalism.

Former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg's constituency of Sheffield Hallam. Great Britain hater Clegg is one of the noisiest advocates for open border mass immigration along with the benefits of multi-culturalism and since his constituents repeatedly elect him to office they must concur. Sheffield Hallam is 89% White British, 3.1% White Other, 4% Asian and only 1% Black.

Like Clegg, the former Leader of the Labour Party, Red Ed Miliband is a Great Britain hating Marxist who doesn't believe that the British people should even have a say in membership of the EU.

His Doncaster North constituency does not mirror the diversity he imposes on others and is made up of 96% White British, 1.7% White Other, 0.8% Asian and a minuscule 0.4% Black.

One final example closer to home which re-enforces the point that the nosiest advocates for diversity, mass immigration and multi-culturalism sit idly by while someone else pays the price for their mindless voting behavior.

Aberavon on the South Wales coast holds the dubious honour of being the safest Labour seat in the country and in their collective stupidity recently elected the 'Red Prince' Stephen Kinnock as their Parliamentary representative. The son of notorious wealthy Welsh socialists Neil and Glenys Kinnock, Stephen has spent almost his entire life promoting global socialism on the coat tails of his parents careers in the British Parliament and the EU.

He has spent little time in Great Britain and none at all to speak of in the one party state of Aberavon. Stephen Kinnock and, by their votes, his constituents, support open border mass immigration which is easy to do when they don't suffer the consequences of their actions.

The advocates for diversity and multi-culturalsim live in a constituency made up of 96% White British, 1.3% White Other, 1.3% Asian and 0.3% Black.

In order to avoid the richly deserved accusations of hypocrisy the people of these constituencies, and the others who vote similarly, should open their towns and arms in welcome to the immigrants and refugees they have so far studiously avoided.

I am sure there will be no objections or complaints when the mosques and temples start going up in Witney, Chipping Norton, Burford, Charlbury, Sheffield Hallam, Doncaster North and Aberavon along with the Big Issue sellers and beggars that will appear on every street corner to enrich their lives.


Saturday, June 20, 2015

Michelle Obama's London Visit Was A Calculated Insult

Being America's first black/white mixed race President, Barack Obama was in an ideal position to heal the wounds of racial division not only in the United States but across the world. Tragically, he and his administration threw that opportunity away in order to exploit the latent racial animosity between communities and deepen the divisions as a means of imposing their 'progressive' ideology.

His own personal animosity toward Great Britain and it's people is palpable and this is supposedly driven by abuse metered out to his late father by the colonial administration in Kenya during colonial days.

Even the briefest investigation reveals that the only abuse meted out to Obama Senior was by Kenya's first President and dictator, Jomo Kenyatta, who prevented him from making a living on his return from the USA thus sending him over the edge into alcoholism.

Michelle Obama admitted that the first time in her life she was proud to be an American was after the election of her husband to the Presidency. If that was her sentiment toward her own country which has afforded her the opportunity to become rich beyond the dreams of millions of her compatriots and finally make it to the White House, then Great Britain has no chance of getting her respect.

Her latest jolly abroad, billed as a two day whistle stop tour to the UK to promote her girls education initiative, 'Let Girls Learn', consisted of a visit to a segregated girls school in the notoriously corrupt Bangladeshi ghetto of Tower Hamlets. Avoiding the possibility of meeting any real British people, her 'tour' also consisted of a visit to Prime Minister David Cameron at No 10 Downing Street and tea with Prince Harry at Kensington Palace.

Her speech to the pupils at the Mulberry Schools for Girls was not only an exercise in the Obama administrations deeply ingrained policy of victimology but also a calculated insult to the British people.

In view of her status as First Lady of the United States we can allow her a little licence to fabricate but her assertion that 'she sees herself when she looks out at all these young women' is dishonest in the extreme, while her claim that 'their story is her story' would suggest that she too was raised wearing a hijab in a male dominated Muslim ghetto or something similar.

This visit and the subsequent speech by Michelle Obama was a conscious attempt to portray Tower Hamlets as representative of Great Britain as a whole as well as portraying the inhabitants as disadvantaged by their skin colour and religious beliefs by an institutionally racist population.

The truth is that these girls are victimised and disadvantaged not by institutionalised British racism but by their own parents and their institutionally misogynistic anti-western Muslim community.

The people of this community had all the advantages of any other British citizen when they or their parents emigrated from Bangladesh. Instead they decided to ignore the advantages of freedom and individual liberty in an open society but went on to replicate the the country they left behind instead, warts and all.

The girls that Michelle Obama identifies with, and their parents, consider themselves to be Bangladeshi not British, they live their lives according to Bangladeshi culture and Islam while despising British culture and its way of life.

Unfortunately these girls will most likely end up married to an older relative from rural Bangladesh, confined inside the home with no rights whatsoever let alone women's rights. In a worst case scenario they may suffer genital mutilation or end up fulfilling their dreams like many other young 'British' schools girls by eloping to Syria in order to become jihadi brides for ISIS killers.

Michelle Obama could have made the effort to visit the outstanding Middle Rasen Primary School in rural Lincolnshire and offer her congratulations to the pupils and staff for their outstanding academic achievement. This school is an excellent example of what can be achieved when young people are not encumbered by 'progressives' with imposed 'multi-culturalism or Islam.

It's worth mentioning in passing that academic excellence is now frowned upon by the new breed of 'progressive' school inspectors and as a consequence the Middle Rasen Primary School has been denied the top award on account it is too English or not multi-cultural enough.
(Read the shocking story here)

Alternatively, Mrs Obama could have visited the schools used by her fellow 'progresssive' Tony Blair; the former Prime Minister of Great Britain who famously proclaimed that he "came to socialism via Marxism" who happened to be the person responsible for opening the borders to mass immigration from the undeveloped world including Bangladesh.

As a matter of ideological principle Blair opposed the private and selective education system in favour of the dumbed down state system whereby the all-must-have-prizes mentality has disastrously degraded education performance. Except for his own sons that is....after the proclamation by his Labour Party that they "didn't do God" Blair suddenly became a Roman Catholic in order that his sons could attend the much sought after, and selective, London Oratory faith school.

He could have practiced himself what he preached to the British people but obviously dumbed down schools are for the victims of socialism not its prophets.

Its worth noting in conclusion that Great Britain's most notorious race baiter, the Member of Parliament for  Hackney North and Stoke Newington, Dianne Abbot, is like Blair, a passionate campaigner against private education........except for her own son who attended the fee paying City of London School.

Dianne Abbot styles herself as Afro-Caribbean as opposed to British who's anti-white sentiments and rhetoric would make her a shoe-in for a Barack Obama advisor on race along with the Reverends Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Jeremiah Wright.

Great Britain under Blair, Brown and now Cameron has been fundamentally transformed for the worse and is now resembling a third world nation which is descending further into mediocrity with every year that passes.

Its disheartening to note that under the Obama administration, with Michelle in tow, the United States is going the same way and when it does the last hope for the world is extinguished. Lets hope and pray that the American people come to their senses and bring their political class to heel, something their trans-Atlantic cousins studiously failed to do.

Must read Richard Littlejohn column here.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

200th Anniversary Of Waterloo Coincides With Ramadan - Who Cares?

As mentioned previously, in their attempts to impose 'multi-culturalism' on the British people, the political class and the establishment are actively distorting British history as well as discouraging overt celebrations of military victories to avoid giving offence to our historical European enemies.

It was doubly pleasing therefore to see HR the Prince of Wales along with the Duchess of Cornwall and the current Duke of Wellington overtly celebrating the two hundredth anniversary of the defeat of the French at Battle of Waterloo.

(To mark his epic victory, one prominent government Minister is reputed to have said in a citation that the Duke of Wellington "had saved civilisation from the French")

Because of their craven subservience to the European Union (EU) and their obvious discomfort at these celebrations it is also pleasing to know that there will be much anger and gnashing of teeth among the Europhile political establishment in Great Britain along with their masters in Brussels.

This same political establishment are not so coy about marking the start of the Muslim observance of Ramadan today whereby Great Britain's most indulged minority starve and dehydrate themselves between sunrise and sunset.

The British people are being asked not to eat or drink in front of a fasting Muslim out of respect while schools and workplaces are being asked to show flexibility in their requirements during the month.

The political establishment bleat on about the virtues of religious piety, observance and charitable giving during Ramadan while ignoring the fact that hundreds of their fellow countrymen and women are in Iraq and Syria showing none of the above. Instead they are displaying the exact opposite by raping, torturing, immolating and beheading men women and children in the name of Allah, under the orders of Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him?) and as written in the Koran.

Great Britain's Muslim community - along with most other imported communities - have no interest whatsoever in British history or it's heritage or its way of life. In fact many openly despise all three and together with the British political establishment and the self loathing community are consciously working to bring about cultural and demographic replacement.

The British government, along with the establishment and the aforementioned self loathing community, are well aware that the vast majority of the indigenous British people have as much interest in Ramadan, Islam and Mohammad as Muslims have in Christmas, Easter and Jesus Christ.

It is safe to say that outside of natural curiosity and an acceptance that they exist as customs elsewhere, they have little or no interest in Diwali, Eid al Fitr, Yom Kippur, Chinese New Year Shiva, Buddha, Zoroaster, Guru Nanak either.

This doesn't stop the establishment and the politicised institutions from using political correctness, and the threat of prosecution for hate crimes, to silence any objections and to force acceptance of alien customs and practices no matter how barbaric onto an unwilling British populace.

As sure as death, taxes and political hypocrisy, David Cameron and the establishment will be falling over themselves in a months time to give their Eid Mubarak wishes to the disorientated Muslim community as they battle to get back into sync with their Circadian rhythms and the rest of the civilised world.

In the meantime as British documented Muslims celebrate Ramadan by starving and dehydrating themselves during the day, the real British will have celebrated, and will celebrate or mark in the near future, the eight hundredth anniversary of Magna Carta, the six hundredth anniversary of Agincourt, the two hundredth anniversary of Waterloo, the one hundredth anniversary of World War l,  the seventieth anniversary of Victory in Europe Day and the eighty ninth birthday of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

In most instances as opposed starving themselves the British will celebrate by drinking and eating, often in quantities that is detrimental to their good health. In order to carry on this a noble tradition I will be raising a glass or three today along with dinner to the Duke of Wellington and his men in honour of their glorious victory over the French and if that upsets or offends anyone be they French or Muslim, that will be too bad.

It is worth noting in conclusion that Ramadan is not without its risks for jihadis; in addition to starving and dehydrating themselves, Muslims are also required under threat of fines, flogging and even death, to refrain from lying, sexual relations, smoking and fighting during Ramadan. Refraining from these during the day for sub-human savages is a tough call indeed.


Watch this and weep/laugh. British Prime Minister David Cameron doing what he does best. Lying through his teeth.

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Rachel Dolezal - Joining Al Jolson Down The Swanee River

Just when you think that the 'progressive' left has reached the peak of their imbecility, along comes Rachel Dolezala white girl pretending to be black, to prove us all wrong. The behavior of this sad excuse for a human being has not just taken self loathing to a whole new level, she's taken it into the stratosphere.

Putting hilarity to one side it's worth looking at this issue in a little more detail in order to ascertain whether white people blacking up and pretending to be black people involves any wider implications.

I was aware of the 'white privilege' group of self loathers who believe that all white people are advantaged from birth due to their skin colour while ignoring widespread white poverty along with the fact that the highest offices in the USA have been occupied by black people. I was not aware however that there was a 'WrongSkin' affliction whereby some sad individuals who are white by birth and heritage identify themselves as black and therefore claim they are born in the wrong skin.

There is also the issue of legality, whereby due to the obsession with race and affirmative action in the USA, pretending to be from an ethnic minority or black can bear dividends. Many lucrative positions and scholarships are reserved for ethnic minorities and blacks where the qualifying requirements are sometimes relaxed in order to meet quotas.

It is asserted that Massachusetts Senator and possible Presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren broke the law when she lied about her Native American heritage in order to secure a lucrative position at Harvard University on the basis of her minority status and being a person of colour.  Given the moniker 'Fauxcahontas' or 'Liawatha' her claim is based on a picture of her supposed great-great grandfather having high cheekbones and a cookbook with the demeaning title of Pow Wow Chow.

Despite being an absolute phony, Rachel Dolezal has secured a position as a part time professor for Africana Studies at Washington University in addition to a position as a civil rights activist with the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (NAACP). Although the organisation appears to have given her a green light, real black people are justifiably offended by her fakery.

The sad thing about this issue is the realisation of just how far the 'progressive' left have dragged America's reputation into the arena of wackiness and stupidity.

The Rachel Dolezal racial fakery, the obsession with sexuality and gender along with the global ballyhoo surrounding the fundamental transformation of Bruce Jenner into Caitlyn, the once respected United States of America has become the laughing stock of the world.

On a lighter side, the approval given by the NAACP to Rachel Dolezal adopting a black persona has afforded the world an opportunity to reverse some of the more risible aspects of political correctness and it can start with the rehabilitation of Al Jolson and other minstrels as part of Vaudeville and harmless light entertainment.

Nobody should be offended by a re-release of The Swanee Ribber with Rachel Dolezal's voice added to that of Al Jolson and in Great Britain re-runs of the immensely popular Black and White Minstrel Show can now be shown without causing offence.

Born-in-the-WrongSkin Michael Jackson, a sort of Al Jolson in reverse, certainly started something when he made colour change acceptable.