Thursday, February 11, 2016

They Felt The Bern In Venezuela Now They Can't Get Toilet Paper


They'll either be throwing their hands up in despair in downtown Caracas today, or splitting their sides with laughter, as Bernie Sanders wins the New Hampshire Democratic Primary by promising lots of 'free stuff' to blinkered voters under the banner of something called 'democratic socialism'.

Mentioning 'democratic' and 'socialism' in the same sentence is itself an indication of delusion which seems to infect all proponents of this tested, failed and derelict ideology.

Both Democratic Party candidates in the Presidential primaries, Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton espouse socialism as their core ideology although the more PR conscious Clinton prefers to use the more image friendly labels 'progressive' or 'liberal'.

It doesn't matter how it's packaged, socialism/communism remains a destructive ideology with a proven track record of abject failure, poverty, misery and tyranny.

Although both Sanders and Clinton are careful to hide the connection between socialism and communism it doesn't take much to expose the truth.

Don't be fooled by Sanders using the tag 'democratic socialism' or Clinton using 'progressive', or 'liberal' - "The goal of socialism is communism" so says Vladimir Lenin and he should know.

The relationship, between socialism and communism could not have been put better than by Ayn Rand when she opined thus:

"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide".

The theory of socialism and communism is in itself seductive with it's message of fairness together with the abolition of demons such as inequality, poverty, hunger, homelessness and war along with creating a caring, sharing community where everyone wallows in brotherly love.

It's enough to melt the hearts of even the hardest capitalists and convert them into woolly, hand wringing bleeding hearts overnight if only they would listen to wealthy career politicians such as Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton who, incidentally, happen to be members of the ruling class they claim to be fighting against on behalf of the people.

The reality of socialism/communism cannot be more different and it should not have slipped anyone's notice that neither Sanders nor Clinton ever give examples of a successful socialist country and they avoid like the plague any mention of the plethora of failed socialist countries that blight the planet - Venezuela being one of the latest.

They also fail to mention as they promote their destructive creed, the inevitable lapse into totalitarianism that has always accompanied socialism/communism wherever in the world it raises it's ugly head.

Only last week resource rich Venezuela was hiring a fleet of Jumbo jets to import millions of bank notes in order to cope with their 720% inflation rate.

In this resource rich country the late tyrant, Hugo Chavez along with his successor Nicolas Maduro, have managed to engineer shortages of everything from basic foodstuffs, such as  flour, eggs, meat and vegetables to condoms and personal cleanliness products such as soap, toothpaste and toilet paper.

Sanders, Clinton and the bought-and-paid-for main stream media may hide it from the public during the election campaign but Venezuela is a living example of the utter dereliction, poverty and misery that results from the very socialist policies being touted by these two career politicians.

Shortages of basic goods, food riots, along with poverty and misery for the masses are standard in all socialist/communist countries but it is the inevitable lapse into totalitarianism that should concern people the most.

Despite former US President Jimmy Carter declaring the Venezuelan elections 'free and fair', Chavez and his successor Maduro used intimidation, media censorship and murder to steal elections and remain in power.

With the country and the economy in ruins thanks to the Hugo Chavez socialist revolution, Jimmy Carter remained in denial about his hero and his perverted ideology; he wanted Chavez to be remembered for the 'gains he made for the poor and vulnerable' and opining further that 'we have never doubted Hugo Chavez's commitment to improving the lives of millions of his fellow countrymen'.
(Carter's nonsense here)

Exactly who the 'we' are that Carter is referring to remains a mystery but it is safe to assume that it's his fellow believers; it is no mystery however to note that if Carter, along with Sanders and Clinton, were forced to live under the economic system they propose for others they may not be quite such enthusiastic advocates.

In conclusion it is worth pointing out to the obviously committed supporters of both Sanders and Clinton the words of one observant commentator who stated with wit that although 'the road to socialism is paved with unwiped a*ses, they will soon be able to attend to their personal hygiene with worthless banknotes.

A previous article on the failure of Venezuelan socialism here



Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Clinton And Albright Have More In Common Than Their Genitalia



Despite a lifetime of portraying herself as a radical feminist and using the possible historical precedent of being the first woman President, it comes as some surprise to read that Presidential candidate and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is failing to attract the female millennial vote.

What is equally surprising is that despite have a veritable army of spin doctors, media managers and image consultants at her disposal she chose to wheel out another former Secretary of State and superannuated Bill Clinton appointee, Madeleine Albright to help reverse the trend.

The whole idea that anyone should elect the President of the United States of America on the basis of their gender is ludicrous as well as insulting but it is not only old age and gender that these two ladies have in common.

If, as Madeleine Albright insinuated, 'there's a special place in hell for women who don't vote for Hillary Clinton' then woe betide the Secretaries of State who ignored multiple requests for extra security at diplomatic missions overseas which resulted in the death of Americans and destruction on a monumental scale.

Prior to the 2012 attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi it is alleged by security operatives on the ground that Clinton and her State Department refused multiple requests to beef up security at the mission and it's annex, a decision which cost the lives of four Americans including the Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.

This tragedy was identical to an even bigger tragedy in Kenya back in 1998 where, like Benghazi, pleas to beef up security at the American Embassy in Nairobi were repeatedly ignored by Madeleine Albright's State Department. This resulted in the deaths of 213 people including 12 Americans, 32 Foreign Service National employees and a horrific 4,000 injuries.

In both instances the requests for extra security and other related precautions were in response to intelligence reports warning of terrorist attacks but were refused by the State Department.

Reading the official report into the Nairobi tragedy one is struck by the similarity of the attitudes and actions between Clinton's State Department and that of Madeleine Albright's toward local sources on the ground in both instances.

It was revealed that although there were no intelligence reports of threats immediately prior to the bombing there were earlier specific threats against several US diplomatic missions and other targets including the US Embassy in Nairobi. These were discounted because of doubts about sources.

In addition to action taken locally, Ambassador Prudence Bushnell cabled Washington DC drawing their attention to further terrorist threats aimed at the mission emphasizing the embassy's extreme vulnerability to a vehicle bomb. She also requested support for a new chancery. These were refused.

In March 1998 the State Department issued a world wide alert warning of Osama bin Laden's threat against American military and civilian targets. This was not accompanied by any warning or analysis that Embassies in East Africa might be targeted.

In April 1998 Ambassador Bushnell wrote an emotional letter directly to Secretary Albright begging for her personal help to organise a more secure Embassy in the face of mounting terrorist threats plus a warning that she was the subject of an assassination plot. Ignorantly this went unanswered.

This was followed by a letter to Under Secretary Cohen a month later restating her concerns regarding the vulnerability of the Embassy, repeating the need for a new chancery that would meet the current security standards.

These concerns were fobbed off by Ms. Cohen a month later by her reiterating Washington's previous designation of Nairobi as a medium security threat post for political violence and terrorism and due to the general soundness of the building replacing the chancery ranked low on the list of priorities.

Astonishingly Ms. Cohen informed the Ambassador that not only were they not going to replace the chancery, they planned to extend it's useful life and beef up security at some point in the future including a $4.1 million plan to replace the windows.

Ambassador Bushnell wrote Albright again stating that the State Department response was "endangering the lives of embassy personnel".

The rest is history; three months later on August 7 a truck bomb was exploded by terrorists which devastated the building killing hundreds and injuring thousands.

One investigation reported that:

"The State Department has acknowledged that Ms. Bushnell raised questions about security before the bombing. But a close examination of events in the year before the assaults, based on interviews with officials throughout the U.S. government, shows her concerns were more intense, more well-founded, more specific, and more forcefully expressed than has previously been known".

And to add further insult to the victims of the carnage and a demonstration of the incompetence that would be repeated in Benghazi some fourteen years later the same report concluded thus:

"The CIA and the FBI had been amassing increasingly ominous and detailed clues about potential threats in Kenya, officials said. But the State Department bureaucracy still dismissed Ms. Bushnell. She was even seen by some at the State Department as a nuisance who was overly obsessed with security, according to one official".
(See the report here)

Politicians and their associated bureaucrats are quick to use the "lessons have been learned" get-out-of-jail card but as the people have learned to their cost this is nothing more than a meaningless soundbite deliberately used to close down debate and absolve the guilty parties from blame and sanction.

Looking back at the attitude and behavior of Clinton and Albright before and after the terrorist outrages in Nairobi and Benghazi, not to mention the embassy bombing in Dar es Salaam, it is abundantly clear that they are cast from the same mold, they hold the same views and exhibit the same arrogant and dismissive attitude to the tragedies that unfolded on their watch: they are both in charge of everything and responsible for nothing, they dismiss any criticism and ignore the victims and their loved one's.

If there's a special place in hell for anyone, Clinton and Albright will be at the front of the line.  




Monday, February 1, 2016

Unjust Geneva Convention - Soldier Rots In Prison Warmonger Stays Free


When it was revealed that Her Majesty's Shadow Secretary of Defence, Emily Thornberry, has received political donations from a dodgy law firm, Leigh Day, who scoured the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan searching for 'victims of abuse' supposedly perpetrated by British soldiers with a view to suing them, it raised the age old issue of what are acceptable or unacceptable actions during warfare.

(Dodgy law firm get busted here)

It came as news to millions of people, myself included, that there exists a 145-strong department called the Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) charged with investigating these allegations and who's caseload has exceeded 1,500 cases. The investigation into whether Iraqi's or Afghans were ill-treated or unlawfully killed by soldiers will drag on until 2019 at the earliest and cost at least
$88 million.

How that affects soldiers efficiency on the battlefield is anyone's guess but it can hardly be conducive to their morale.

Law firms like Leigh Day and the IHAT who together swim in the fetid swamp of the recently created human rights industry would serve justice better if they investigated with equal vigour those who send soldiers into battle in the first place.

The infamous case of jailed-for-life Royal Marine Sgt Alexander Blackman, previously designated Marine A and the man who got him involved the war, Prime Minister Tony Blair is a case in point.
(Marine A prosecution here)

No one could have put the issue in clearer language than author and journalist George Orwell who opined on the issue way back in 1943. It's worth quoting part of his article from his Tribune newspaper column, As I Please, to illustrate the point:

"I note the surprise with which many people seem to discover that war is not a crime. Hitler, it appears, has not done anything actionable. He has not raped anybody, nor carried off any pieces of loot with his own hands, nor personally flogged any prisoners, buried any wounded men alive, thrown any babies into the air and spitted them on his bayonet, dipped any nuns in petrol and touched them off with church tapers - in fact he has not done any of the things which any enemy nationals are credited with doing in war-time. He has merely precipitated a world war which will have cost twenty million lives before it ends. And there's nothing illegal in that".

Since this was written the Geneva and Hague Conventions have been updated and re-written to clarify the laws of war with the noble intention of protecting prisoners and non-combatants among a myriad of other things.

In light of the fact that the war which resulted in Sgt Blackman being jailed for finishing off a fatally wounded Taliban terrorist was justified by Tony Blair using doctored intelligence reports and outright lies and also by the fact that he is free as a bird, it is abundantly clear that the Geneva and Hague Conventions make the serving soldier doing what he is trained to do liable to prosecution while absolving the warmonger from any responsibility or guilt whatsoever.

Blair lied to Parliament and along with his communications chief Alastair Campbell deliberately 'sexed up' the dossier on weapons of mass destruction and other matters in order to justify waging war on Iraq which posed no threat to Great Britain or it's people.
( One dodgy dossier story here)

In the context of Orwell's quote Tony Blair was party to precipitating a war which has so far cost the lives of anywhere between two-hundred thousand and a million souls, most of them civilians and it appears he has done nothing illegal.

Blair's actions have not  justified prosecution under the Geneva and Hague Conventions therefore they are not fit for purpose and consequently they should be considered invalid for deciding guilt for the causes and actions in modern international armed conflicts.

It must also be acknowledged that in addition to the appalling casualties resulting from Blair's war it has also precipitated the rise of ISIS which in turn has resulted in murder and mayhem across the world and a further untold increase in casualties.

Orwell ended his article thus:

"Nevertheless, a world in which it is wrong to murder an individual civilian and right to drop a thousand tons of high explosive on a residential area does sometimes make me wonder whether this earth of ours is not a loony-bin made use of by some other planet".

In conclusion, Sgt Blackman's action of dispatching a single terrorist to claim his virgins in paradise was done under unimaginable stress in the heat of battle and is trivial compared to horrendous casualties caused by the illegal actions of Tony Blair which were decided at his leisure with no stress at all.

Sgt Blackman is a hero who did what he was trained to do and therefore he should be released forthwith with his rank and benefits restored.
   



Tuesday, January 26, 2016

British Lose The Plot - Ban Trump But Welcome Mugabe Torturer


It's not the fact that the British Parliament debated whether to ban Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, from entering Great Britain that embarrassed the nation but the fact that so many legislators spoke in favour of the ban. They fell over each other in order put their left wing credentials on public display but unfortunately for them it also laid bare their total lack of intellectual integrity.

Wanting to ban the person who is leading the race to become the most powerful person on the planet only served to confirm what informed people had previously only suspected, that members of the modern British political class are bereft of any common sense or vision or to put it in the current popular vernacular, a total waste of space.

The debate was initiated by an online Parliamentary petition reaching the required number of signatures and therefore it was a legitimate subject but one would have thought that legislators would have used the opportunity to educate the signatories not only in the folly of their quest but the sheer hypocrisy contained therein.

Unfortunately, way too many British people have been so totally crushed by two decades of rigidly policed political correctness they actively look for the slightest excuse to attach labels on each other in order to win an argument.

The all time favourites are 'racist' and 'Islamophobe' which are pinned on anyone who holds different views on imposed 'multi-culturalism' to that of the 'progressive' metropolitan political elite and are not afraid to air them in public using their own style.

Donald Trump's particular thought crime was to suggest a moratorium on Muslim immigration until they can be properly vetted. In addition to this is his promise to build a wall to secure the porous southern border which has earned the displeasure of the Cultural Marxists that infest the global political establishment and the international government-media complex.

In their attempt to demonise Trump they ignored the fact that these remarks were made after the Muslim atrocities in Paris and San Bernadino. Also memories are still raw concerning other Muslim atrocities committed in the name Allah in places like Chattanooga, Fort Hood and the Boston marathon not to mention the Twin Towers on 9/11.

The porous southern border was also responsible for the murder of Kate Steinle, shot in the back while out walking with her father by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a violent illegal immigrant who had been deported on five previous occasions.

Unlike the agenda driven political class in Great Britain Donald Trump is making the safety and security of the American people a top priority as opposed to ignoring the violence, rape and murder perpetrated against the British people for reasons of political expediency.

Trump's remarks were labelled as 'hate speech' - a favourite term of the socialist/communist/liberal community better know by their adopted, inappropriate name of  'progressives' - and this is where their complete and utter hypocrisy shines through like a beacon.

There are thousands of examples of dangerous characters who have not only been allowed entry into Great Britain but have been supported in their vileness by taxpayer funded welfare benefits. Some of these sub-humans are as base as it's possible to be, compared to whom Donald Trump is an anointed Saint in God's Heaven.

The creature pictured above is Philip Machemedze, who enjoyed his previous role as torturer for blood soaked Zimbabwean tyrant, Robert Mugabe. Machemedze admitted being a cold blooded killer and rapist who enjoyed hacking the limbs of enemies so that they died slowly in agony.

(Read the shocking story here)

There are thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of similar cases whereby the most appalling and dangerous characters imaginable are allowed to stay in Great Britain paid for by taxpayer funded welfare benefits.

Here are two more I will use to illustrate the point.

Trump's common sense remarks on Muslim immigration and secure borders was classed as hate speech by those MP's that wanted him banned, however these same MP's remained silent on Mr. Abu Hamza. An illegal immigrant and welfare supported terrorist, he was an unrepentant al-Qaeda supporter who was allowed to openly spread his vile, anti-infidel hate speech in London for years without their comment. After fighting extradition for nearly a decade, again financed by the taxpayers, he now languishes in an America prison where he will hopefully meet his maker.


Osama bin Laden's right hand man in Europe and illegal immigrant, Mr.Abu Qatada, was labelled by the security services as 'extremely dangerous' but was allowed to stay for years living a normal life among the people he hated and plotted to kill. Like Abu Hamza this evil creature fought extradition for years and finally self-deported to his homeland in Jordan where he was wanted for terrorist related crimes.

It has been reported that if he doesn't get what the authorities consider a fair trial in Jordan the European Court of Human Rights would insist that Great Britain must take him back to resume his life of luxury and to take advantage of the freedoms he is committed to destroying.

The Parliamentary debate to ban Donald Trump from Great Britain - along with the missed opportunity to educate the low information petition signatories - is an embarrassment for the country but it is not entirely surprising. The new leader of the Labour Party is a Great Britain hating, life long communist, Jeremy Corbyn, who counts the leaders of terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah as his friends.

As a measure of how much the British people have lost the plot and are actively engineering their own oblivion, Corbyn's party has two-hundred and thirty-one Members of Parliament with a rag tag group of seventy-seven Members who share many of his aspirations. That's three-hundred and eight out of a total of six-hundred and fifty Members.

Great Britain needs its own version of Donald Trump because civilisation is indeed hanging by a thread in the Sceptred Isle.

Update: Romanian criminal allowed into Britain despite a string of convictions. Story here




Monday, January 25, 2016

Win The War But Lose The Peace - This Is What Surrender Looks Like



When German Chancellor, Angela Merkel refused to allow British Prime Minister David Cameron to act in the interests of Great Britain by reforming the rules for immigrant welfare claimants unless British low paid workers were punished in return, it was a stark reminder that the German Chancellor has as much power over the British people as Cameron or any other elected Member of Parliament.

The reform was intended to stop Great Britain's generous welfare entitlement system being a magnet to economic colonists from around the world who risk life and limb to claim their free money and which has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and their way of life.

An even bigger disaster has been Merkel's open border immigration policies combined with the new quota system which Cameron is powerless to stop. This is designed to speed up the process of cultural and demographic replacement and the imposition of so called 'multi-cultural societies' on Great Britain and the other nation states of Europe.

Despite having the fastest growing population in Europe, Merkel and the EU bureaucrats have unceremoniously torn up Cameron's deal on asylum and are imposing quotas on Great Britain way in excess of the countries' ability to absorb them all.

By any measure this is not in the interests of the British people and only serves to undermine their safety, security and future prosperity. Therefore one is bound to ask what is the point of having a British Prime Minister and an elected Parliament when they are unable to act in the best interests of the people they have sworn to protect?

Modern students of history should study how a country that was roundly defeated in two world wars - the second of which left its cities, industry and infrastructure so utterly devastated its a wonder they survived - could rise up from the ashes and conquer the victors without a shot being fired.

The Marshall Plan rebuilt their devastated infrastructure however it was not needed to rebuild their ambition to dominate Europe because, as current events clearly demonstrate, that was never defeated.

It's astonishing how a British Prime Minister can be so weak and craven that he tugs a forelock to a German Chancellor who is well on the way to completing the vision of her predecessors, including the Kaiser and Hitler, to build a German dominated, Jew free Europe from the Atlantic to Urals.

The memory of those hero's who made the ultimate sacrifice in these two destructive wars to keep Great Britain free and sovereign has been desecrated and despoiled by a treacherous political class who are intent on surrendering everything they died for.

Despite attempts to disguise the federalist aspirations of the European Union it is now common knowledge that the EU project from the outset was to abolish the independent sovereign states of Europe and replace them with a single state using the old Soviet Union as a template.
           
In many ways the United States of Europe is a sick parody of the United States of America whereby many of its historical symbols were hijacked in order to foster the impression they are similar entities. Hence the EU has 'Founding Fathers' and 'Constitution' along with Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches.

All phony of course because in reality the whole show is run by the unelected, unaccountable  European Commission which in turn is totally dominated by the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.

A dedicated communist party apparatchik from the former Soviet puppet state of East Germany, Merkel is no friend of individual liberty, free enterprise or democracy and has a particular distaste for, and animosity towards, Great Britain and it's people. 

Her utterances and actions are proof positive that Angela Merkel despises the British people's attitude and lack of conviction toward the European superstate project and as a consequence she takes it out on David Cameron by indulging in his public humiliation whenever he shows any sign of standing up for the British people he has sworn to represent.

Faced with this emotionless, agenda driven automaton it is vital that the British people have a representative that will put their interests above all other considerations, especially their safety, security and economic well being. They also need this representative to protect their culture, their heritage and their way of life.

What they've actually got is David Cameron, a craven careerist who has a lack of dignity and self respect and allows himself to be dominated and bullied not only by the German Chancellor but by other members of the EU politburo such as 'President' of Europe, Jean-Claude Junker, a career bureaucrat from Luxembourg and another 'President' of Europe, Donald Tusk from Poland.

Mentioning David Cameron in the same sentence as Sir Winston Churchill is akin to blasphemy but inevitably comparisons will be made; it is however an exercise in futility as there is no worthwhile comparison that can be made.

While Sir Winston was a loyal servant of the people - steadfast and resolute in defence of Great Britain, along with it's heritage and way of life, David Cameron is the polar opposite who is actively engaged in surrendering all that Churchill and the British people fought for in two world wars.

What makes it incalculably worse is that he is surrendering it all to an enemy that was defeated at such a terrible cost.

While Churchill is quoted as saying that "If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, she must always choose the open sea". David Cameron was quoted as saying only recently that "he feels deeply European from the bottom of my heart".

He has also vowed to fight with his heart and soul to keep Great Britain inside this undemocratic German dominated superstate no matter what.

As the engineered 'refugee crisis' continues to blight the lives of the British and European people with rampant violent crime including rape and murder, Cameron and the elite show no signs abandoning their superstate project and this can only result in conflict as the people take it upon themselves to protect themselves and their communities.

Although it is censored by the government-media complex, many towns and cities across Europe are on fire as people rise up against the political elite including Cameron and Merkel.

Looking forward into the not too distant future, the intransigence of this political elite with respect to using open border mass immigration to achieve cultural and demographic replacement, it is putting the peace of the entire continent at risk.



    

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Insulting Our Intelligence With Blatant Lies And Propaganda



I am sure he spoke for millions of us when British journalist and author, Peter Hitchens, eloquently stated that 'sharks bite, cow pats stink and politicians lie. I'm used to all these things. They're facts of life. But I can't stand it when people pretend otherwise". He made this observation in reference to the British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne's risible claims of success in the face of disastrous economic indicators and a dire economic performance.

Although there is an endless procession of politicians who lie and deceive as a matter of course, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, takes some beating. On a variety of subjects from economic performance to immigration and multi-culturalism, his pronouncements have become desperate and demonstrably false.

As these falsehoods become ever more risible he is insulting the intelligence of all bar his army of dullards by assuming people will actually believe him.

The British people are well aware that Cameron's only function in life is to keep Great Britain inside the European Union and to implement their cultural replacement agenda using open border mass immigration.

Conversely, Cameron is aware that a majority of the British people are now against continued membership of the EU and it's long planned destruction of the British way of life. Particularly galling is the Islamification program and his continual acceding to the incessant demands of the Muslim colonists no matter how offensive they are to British sensitivities.

The New Years Eve sexual assaults of women in German cities brought to light the horrific rape epidemic perpetrated by Muslim colonists that has been engulfing Europe for decades and this has made EU membership even more unpopular and the resistance to mass immigration solidify as well as becoming more widespread.

As Mr.Hitchens' rightly observes, politicians lying is a 'fact of life' and like him people 'can't stand it' when they pretend otherwise. Cameron's latest outrageous pronouncement is designed to appease the real concerns of the British people as opposed to being a genuine policy he intends to implement.

It relates to the continued influx of incompatible, and in many cases illiterate, Muslim immigrants from the undeveloped world who will make no contribution to British life.

In addition they will be a burden on the social services and other taxpayer funded resources that have already reached the breaking point due to the unprecedented demand caused by the massive influx which has proved impossible to assimilate.

He promises to spend $30 million of taxpayer's money on English language classes for non English speaking Muslim spouses immigrating into the country in order to help them make a contribution to the economy and lessen their susceptibility to radicalisation. If they are not proficient in English after a set period of time they may be deported.

(See here)

This insult is so far from being a pragmatic policy it's bordering on delusional; if he is serious then he should be sectioned along with his handlers and the spin doctors, media managers and advertising executives that come up with this nonsense.

Cameron is well aware that as a consequence of surrendering the sovereignty of Great Britain to the European Union he has surrendered the ability of the Home Secretary to deport undesirables whether they are legal or illegal and regardless of any crimes they have committed.

Instead of insulting the intelligence of the British people, David Cameron, his handlers or any member of his government, need to explain how, if he cannot deport terrorists, murderers, rapists, and a multitude of other violent criminals, how will he be able to deport a housewife because her proficiency in English is not up to scratch?

One also has to bear in mind that any Muslim spouse from the undeveloped world over the age of puberty will have produced a brood in the intervening period and therefore cannot be deported due to her right to family life under the notorious Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.

This appalling insult to the intelligence is compounded when one looks at some of the high profile failures of his government to deport the criminals alluded to above.

For example, Cameron's government failed to deport an Ethiopian immigrant know as J1, a terrorist colleague of the infamous ISIS killer, Jihadi John, along with twenty-eight other terrorists. This includes Algerian, Baghdad Meziane who had links to the al-Qaeda gang involved in the Paris massacre. He also ran a network that supplied fake passports and credit cards to jihadis. He was convicted a decade ago but remains free to walk the streets of Leicester, England, without fear of deportation.

(See these stories here and here)

Nigerian immigrant, Akindoyin Akinshipe was jailed for the rape of a thirteen year old girl but the European Court of Human Rights forbade his deportation because, as the court claimed, they must protect his 'social ties' with Great Britain which grew while he resisted deportation.

(See that story here)

The British High Court refused permission to deport Jamaican murderer, Eric Erron, on the spurious grounds that he was born out of wedlock.

(Story here)

Finally, in 2012/13, 602 appeals by foreign criminals were allowed by the immigration courts with 324 allowed to stay because of their so called right to family life.

(Story here)

The British people now take it as a matter of course that David Cameron, along with his government and their spin machine are lying whenever they are pretending to address their concerns about the destructive effects of open border mass immigration; the unfortunate truth is that they are totally committed to the EU project of replacing the independent, sovereign states of Europe with a post democratic superstate.

This will include what is known as cultural and demographic replacement using open border mass immigration with the objective of creating a generic European citizen loyal to the EU as opposed to their individual nation states.

The course is set and looks to be unstoppable and as a consequence the lies and propaganda will continue unabated. They are utterly shameless and unless the peoples of Europe wake up very soon all will be lost and two millenia of history will be destroyed for ever.

Friday, January 15, 2016

The Military Won't Save Americans From ISIS - The 2nd Amendment Will


It is without doubt that the American military machine, both nuclear and conventional, is the most formidable on the planet. Even after evisceration and the social engineering program implemented by the ideologically driven Obama administration, it remains a formidable fighting machine.

The three branches, the air force, navy and army are equipped with technologically advanced equipment and manned by some of the bravest and most dedicated personnel who are a credit to the American people.

The primary purpose of this military machine is to protect the homeland and the American people along with allies and American interests abroad but looking at global events of the past decade it is failing to secure either.

In decades past any adversary, be they an apocalyptic Ayatollah or communist tyrant, insane enough to engage it in open warfare would be ensuring their own defeat and ultimate destruction. Today these same adversaries are more pragmatic and know they can defeat America without engaging the military machine in open warfare.

With the administration's steadfast refusal to use the overwhelming firepower at it's disposal to put the fear of God into the souls of it's adversaries, it hamstrings them with rules of engagement that are so narrow lawyers are ever present on any battlefield.

The new socially engineered military is openly mocked and no longer respected or feared to the point where the whole nation is taunted and humiliated in front of the entire world by the bullies and thugs of the Iranian Republican Guards.

The reasons for this are political and ideologically driven by a political establishment who are ruthlessly determined to implement their 'progressive' agenda of fundamentally transforming America.

Fundamental transformation was not just a empty slogan manufactured by spin doctors for electoral purposes, it's an actual agenda which can only be described as a revolution.

Not a 'storming of the Winter Palace' type revolution where pitchfork wielding peasants rose up to seize power from the ruling elite but the exact reverse. The ruling elite have worked assiduously to seize power from the people using stealth and subterfuge to replace transparency and open government.

As mentioned previously, one of the primary purposes of this military machine is to protect the homeland and the American people.

At home, despite swearing an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, which has been the foundation of America's freedoms, it is being increasingly circumvented by the Obama administration; individual liberty is being replaced by collectivism, the free enterprise system by socialism and constitutionally limited government, by executive fiat.

Meanwhile, abroad, America has abandoned its traditional role as leader of the free world and withdrawn to focus on the fundamental transformation of society at home. Traditional allies have been replaced by former enemies leaving a vacuum which has been filled by the sworn enemies of America and the west.

The results are there for all to see; the Middle East and North Africa have disintegrated with ISIS taking advantage of the chaos to organise and spread their perverted cult to all areas of the world including the USA.

When ISIS are saying they are coming to America any which way they can, including posing as refugees, with the specific intention of causing murder and mayhem, it would be wise to take their word for it as opposed to the word of the political class or the spin and manipulation of the government-media complex.

When the government are using Islam and its adherents as a vehicle to fundamentally transform America, no amount of battle groups, submarines, air force squadrons or battalions will protect the people from killers bent on killing Americans in the name of Allah even at the cost of their own lives.

When the government refuses to seal the borders then proceeds to give sanctuary to illegal immigrants, including murderers, rapists and a host of other violent criminals, the America people are put at risk.

When the government refuses to properly vet so called 'refugees' despite the fact ISIS has made it known they will use the deliberately engineered 'crisis' as an opportunity to infiltrate its fighters into the USA, no amount of military might will protect the American citizen from murder while going about their legitimate business.

With a government that has disassociated Islam from every atrocity committed in its name, what use was the latest multi-billion dollar stealth bomber or hunter-killer submarine or Apache helicopter gunship to the victims of San Bernardino, Boston, Fort Hood or even the Twin Towers?

What use are drones flying for days over the Caliphate in Syria looking for ISIS targets when American people will be murdered at work or in a restaurant or at the cinema by ISIS operatives already embedded?

There is no alternative but for the people to protect themselves using their 2nd Amendment Rights before they are taken away by the ideologically driven administration who are determined to disarm the American people to bring them into line with the rest of the world in accordance with UN diktats.

The American people are unique in that they have the God given right to own a firearm to protect themselves and their families, therefore it is essential they take advantage of it, buy a gun and never, ever surrender it to the government or its agents.