Surrendering Control of The Military Is the Ultimate Treason

The noise generated by the Brexit debate is emanating from the fight about a trade deal and the prorogation of Parliament, but it has also allowed the politicians to avoid debating the more destructive aspects of continued European Union membership.

Among these are the remaining articles of the Lisbon Constitution which will become effective in 2022 such as requiring Great Britain to join the disastrous Eurozone and the equally disastrous open border Schengen area. They failed to debate the ending of the national veto and the surrender of control over any remaining areas which in any independent nation state should be under the control of the people via their elected Parliament.

They failed to debate their surrendering control over taxation to corrupt, money hungry bureaucrats in Brussels and worst of all they failed to debate their plan to surrender the command and control of the British Armed Forces which for British patriots is a step too far.

The European Union has always been sold as a benign economic project concerned with trading in a single, tariff-free market plus membership of a customs union. The truth is that the European Union is, and always has been, a nation building project with the aim of replacing the independent nation states of Europe with a single state centrally controlled by appointed bureaucrats based in Brussels.

If the European Union is not a nation building project then Parliament needs to explain to the people why a benign economic project concerned only with a tariff-free single market and a customs union needs an army, a navy and an air force along with a flag, a national anthem, a Parliament, a judiciary and embassies abroad.

The more vocal and fanatical nation builders such as Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and Guy Verhofstadt have openly called for an independent European Army but this has always been strenuously denied by the British political elite and even dismissed as a ‘dangerous fantasy’ by the former Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg.

Incidentally, Merkel, Macron and Verhofstadt justify their call for an independent European Defence Force because of the need to defend the European Union from its enemies such as Russia, China and the United States.

That would be the same United States that has guaranteed the security of Europe since WWII as the biggest contributor to NATO, but I digress.

Unbeknown to the British public, the political elite have been involved in the planning of a European Defence Force since its inception with the intention of fully integrating the British military into its structure. This would require surrendering command and control to a Eurocrat who may hold historical grudges against the British people especially now since they voted to leave their failing nation building project.

This brings us to the treachery of the former Prime Minister, Theresa May. Known rightly as Theresa the Appeaser, Mrs. May had been planning behind closed doors to integrate the British armed forces into the fledgling European Defence Force (EDF) since taking office.

Those experts with an eye for detail have determined that Mrs. May’s Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration, the infamous surrender document, that supposedly delivered Brexit, not only made Great Britain subservient to the European Union in perpetuity, it also committed the British armed forces to fully integrate with the EDF.

As a measure of Mrs. May's dedication to the European nation building project, she planned to integrate the British armed forces into the EDF and surrender command and control after Great Britain had left the European Union.

This proves that she never intended to honour the result of the peoples’ referendum or she planned to rejoin the EU sometime in the future after the Brexit issue had cooled down.

In more than three years of debate, Parliament has not discussed any of the items mentioned earlier especially not the surrender of Great Britain’s armed forces to the Eurocrats. It took Lord James of Blackheath from the upper chamber to bring it to the nation's attention for which he was roundly booed by the rest of their Lordships.

Parliament is packed to the rafters with people who are totally committed to the European nation building project and who give their unyielding loyalty to the fledgling United States of Europe. They know that this project will fail if a prosperous Great Britain is allowed to exist outside its clutches.

Their loyalty to the European Union is so fanatical they are determined to hand over what remains of peoples’ sovereignty as well as their armed forces to a cabal of faceless, unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels who cannot be removed via the ballot box.

They don’t care that their utter contempt for the people they are supposed to be representing is out in the open. Remaining in the EU is everything to them, it is their Caliphate.    

To conclude: Treason is a horrendous crime against a nation and its people and can take many forms but even the layman can see that by colluding secretly with a foreign power to hand over the governance of the nation and control of its military is treason most foul.


Two shocking articles that exposes the extent of their treachery:


May's secret, scandalous surrender of our defence.


Lt Gen Riley's briefing on the defence threat of hidden EU deals

Amritsar - Virtue Signalling Archbishop's Grovelling Apology

Here we go again. Just months after then Prime Minister, Theresa May, did so in Parliament yet another prominent British figure feels the need to apologize for the Amritsar Massacre perpetrated by a rogue British general during the British Raj in 1919.

Not content with laying a wreath and whispering a silent prayer in remembrance, the head of the world Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, turned virtue signaling to an embarrassing display of undignified groveling. (See here)

Prostrating himself face down before the memorial plinth was over the top even for an agenda driven Archbishop who is more concerned with things temporal than things spiritual such as saving souls and preparing them for eternity.

One is bound to ask what is it about that terrible event in Amritsar a century ago that compels politicians to keep apologizing for it when British colonial history is littered with similar atrocities, particularly in Africa?

The answer is simple; being the cynical, duplicitous people that they are, politicians recognise that the Indian diaspora in Great Britain is a significant voting block that can swing an election whereas the African diaspora is not.

Like the Roman Catholic Pontiff, Pope Francis, Archbishop Welby is a left-wing activist who is not shy to make public his support for socialist causes or his fanatical support for the undemocratic tyranny that the European Union has become.

This support for ‘progressive’ causes includes the Islamisation of Great Britain regardless of its barbaric practices or its goal of subjugating Christians and Jews or, failing that, killing them.

For a global church leader the Archbishop appears to be ignorant of events worldwide where his fellow Christians are being systematically erased by Muslims from areas they have lived in since the dawn of Christianity.

Ancient Christian communities are being erased from Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Syria as well as Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Across Africa from Mali and Nigeria in the west to Kenya, Sudan and Somalia in the east, Christians are being enslaved and slaughtered in their tens of thousands. As far afield as Sri Lanka, Indonesia and the Philippines Christians are being slaughtered by the so-called religion of peace that the Archbishop champions. (List of Islamic terror attacks against Christians here) 

Apart from the Archbishop and the Pope, it is acknowledged around the world that Christianity is now the most persecuted religion on the planet. Even the governments in the predominantly Judeo-Christian continents of Europe and America, Christianity is being vilified and removed from the public square. 

If he took a short walk from his residence at Lambeth Palace, Archbishop Welby could prostrate himself face down on Westminster Bridge where an adherent of Islam murdered four innocent civilians or have his chauffeur drive him to London Bridge, Tavistock Square, Aldgate, Manchester Arena and elsewhere in his home country where Muslims have murdered innocents in the name of Allah, as commanded by their prophet and in accordance with their holy book, the Koran.

As we commemorate the eighteenth anniversary of the World Trade Centre atrocity where Muslims murdered almost three thousand people and injured a further six thousand, it is incumbent upon the Archbishop to make the pilgrimage and prostrate himself face down at Ground Zero or else the world might think his theatrical performance in Amritsar was a nothing other than a virtue signaling publicity stunt.

To conclude: While Archbishop Welby is virtue signaling and apologizing for events from a century ago he is ignoring the fact that his flock at home is dwindling and his empty churches are decaying into dereliction or being turned into warehouses, vehicle workshops and mosques or demolished at the behest of land developers.

It appears that disparaging one’s own country and apologizing for events in history is the in thing to do for the new ‘woke’ generation of political leaders, including Barack Obama, and high-profile personalities like the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope of Rome.

A previous article on the Amritsar apology circus here 

Robert Mugabe - The UN’s Most Valued Mass Killer

The world is a better place today after the passing of the blood-soaked Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe. Known as Butcher Bob, this mass murderer fulfilled his role as an African dictator with ruthless efficiency and without compassion.

As tens of thousands of his victims, both black and white, celebrate the demise of the tyrant, the globalist elite at the UN and elsewhere are falling over themselves to eulogize him and create a legacy that hides the truth about his reign of terror.

In a shameful statement that totally ignores the human suffering caused by Mugabe, UN spokesman, Stephane Dujarric, said that the secretary-general will be sending a letter “offering condolences to the government and people of Zimbabwe”.

Ignoring reality and the consequences of Mugabe’s brutality, spokesman Dujarric went on to say that “the United Nations remains strongly committed to supporting Zimbabwe in its efforts to promote inclusive stability, sustainable development, democratic governance and human rights”.

The reality is that neither Mugabe nor his successor, Emmerson Mnangagwa, has made any effort whatsoever to promote any of the policies mentioned above particularly with respect to democratic governance or human rights.

With a fawning statement that disgraces the American people, even the US Embassy in Zimbabwe insulted the victims of Mugabe’s reign of terror by failing to acknowledge his brutality and inhumanity. (Read it here and the response from Tucker Carlson)

So enamored were they by Mugabe, he was named as a goodwill ambassador by the UN’s World health Organization (WHO) because Zimbabwe was a country that supposedly places universal health coverage and health promotion at the center of its policies to provide health care to all. (See here)

The charity Physicians for Human Rights objected to his nomination stating that: “The government of Robert Mugabe presided over the dramatic reversal of its population's access to food, clean water, basic sanitation and health care,” the group went on to state that: “The Mugabe regime has used any means at its disposal, including politicizing the health sector, to maintain its hold on power.”

The report also said Mr. Mugabe's policies led directly to “the shuttering of hospitals and clinics, the closing of its medical school and the beatings of health workers”.

 Because the pattern was the same across Africa after the former white dominated regimes were removed from power, the actions of the terrorist leader Mugabe were all too predictable. After assuming power there followed the deliberate slaughter of his political rivals along with his tribal rivals and the imposition of one-party rule.

This ushered in a thirty-seven-year reign of terror marked by economic collapse, famine, election rigging and human rights abuses that are the hallmark of African dictators, which are deemed acceptable by the UN and the globalist elite.

The United Nations took no action when the self-confessed Marxist-Leninist, and admirer of China’s Chairman Mao, announced in advance that he was going to use force to seize the white owned farms for redistribution.

They took no action when the tyrant used his North Korean trained Fifth Brigade to slaughter tens of thousands of innocent Ndebele civilians to crush any opposition to his leadership. They did nothing when he violently suppressed opposition political parties and rigged elections to remain in power for thirty-seven long and bloody years. 

The response of the UN to the famine caused by the imposition of Mugabe’s Marxist ideology was to beg western nations to increase aid to Zimbabwe which in turn increased the dependency which endures to this day. While the world responded with food, farm equipment and money, Mugabe saw fit to invade neighboring Congo to steal its mineral wealth in order to pay the troops that kept him in power.

At the heart of every Marxist lies a hatred of America and Mugabe was no different. He rejected desperately needed food aid from America on the spurious grounds that it may contain items from genetically modified crops. His hatred for America took priority over the desperate plight of his starving people.

The entire Zimbabwean tragedy and the tolerance of tyrants like Robert Mugabe is evidence, if any were needed, that to the UN and the global elite the imposition of their ideological agenda takes a higher priority than the safety and well being of the people concerned.

In the case of Zimbabwe, the predicted famine, death, dictatorship and human rights abuses were a price worth paying to remove white people from government and eventually from the continent of Africa.

To conclude: As predicted the same fate is befalling neighboring South Africa, also as predicted, this is acceptable to the UN and the global elite because the removal of white people from government in Africa is the priority whatever the cost in blood, suffering and death.     

Sir John Major – Breathtaking Hypocrisy of The Grey Man

In the dim and distant past the words honesty and integrity meant something and they were essential requirements for anyone serving the public. Doctors, solicitors, the clergy and even postmen were considered people of unimpeachable integrity.

Most politicians used to be part of this august group of individuals but sadly, no longer.  How they went from highly regarded to the lowest form of life is open for debate; their reputation is in the gutter and they don’t give a damn.

The ability to lie with a straight face and not to give an honest answer to the simplest of questions have replaced honesty and integrity as essential requirements for the job. It is, however, hypocrisy and their contempt for the people that is the most damning.

One off the worst cases of hypocrisy and contempt of the people was the recent announcement by former Prime Minister and hallowed Knight Of The Realm, Sir John Major, that he will challenge the proroguing of Parliament in the law courts.

The current plan by the Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament at the request of her Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, is not a constitutional outrage or the coup d’état by fascist tyrants it is being portrayed as, but the normal device that is used to end an old Parliamentary session in order for a new one to begin.

Sir John Major has got his Y fronts in a twist because the prorogation of the longest Parliamentary session since the civil war will lose four days of debate.. He is disregarding the fact that he himself prorogued Parliament during his Premiership losing a full five weeks of debate.

Despite it being the law of the land passed by themselves, this current Parliament has spent the last three years using every dirty trick in the procedural book to ignore their own law and overturn the result of the Brexit referendum to the exclusion of other vital legislation.

Whereas Boris Johnson is proroguing Parliament to introduce a new legislative program that the country desperately needs, Sir John Major prorogued Parliament to prevent the release of documents that exposed the involvement of his Party members in a sleaze and corruption scandal.

This is breathtaking hypocrisy of the very highest order and Sir John Major doesn’t give a damn. He doesn’t give a damn what the people think, he doesn’t give a damn for his own reputation or that of the political class and he doesn’t give a damn about the detrimental effect this will have on British democracy.

All he cares about is the preservation of the European Union and its nation building project which will not survive Brexit and a prosperous Great Britain outside its shackles.

Sir John Major may have been the grey man of British politics and one of the worst Prime Ministers in history, but the damage done to the country by this fanatical Europhile is serious and most likely irrevocable.

He was Chancellor of the Exchequer on Black Wednesday when Great Britain crashed out of the European Union’s Exchange Rate Mechanism costing the economy billions of pounds.

He was the Prime Minister that signed the Maastricht Treaty which surrendered whole swathes of Parliamentary sovereignty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels without consulting the people and without a referendum.

He was part of the cabal of fanatical Europhiles that overthrew Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher because of her pro- British, pro-American, anti-European Union stance. This act of treachery led to thirteen years of the most destructive socialist governments since the war and a complete surrender to the European Union via the Lisbon Treaty.

On the domestic front Sir John is notorious for cheating on his wife with his colleague, Edwina Curry, one of the most unpopular government minsters of the time, and setting up the ‘cones hotline’. 

This harebrained scheme was meant to win over the voting public by setting up a dedicated phone line which the motorist could call to complain about traffic cones at roadworks delaying their journeys.

Rumoured to tuck his shirt into his Y fronts, John Major was the cartoonists dream and he was never able to shake off the image of the grey buffoon in his iconic underwear.

To conclude, John Major’s reward for his treachery, incompetence and destructive Premiership was the highest order of chivalry in the British honors system.

Making a treacherous fool like John Major a Knight of the Garter is rewarding failure as well as downgrading the exclusive and noble order which was founded by King Edward III in 1348; it also brings the entire honors system into question.