Robert Mugabe - The UN’s Most Valued Mass Killer

The world is a better place today after the passing of the blood-soaked Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe. Known as Butcher Bob, this mass murderer fulfilled his role as an African dictator with ruthless efficiency and without compassion.

As tens of thousands of his victims, both black and white, celebrate the demise of the tyrant, the globalist elite at the UN and elsewhere are falling over themselves to eulogize him and create a legacy that hides the truth about his reign of terror.

In a shameful statement that totally ignores the human suffering caused by Mugabe, UN spokesman, Stephane Dujarric, said that the secretary-general will be sending a letter “offering condolences to the government and people of Zimbabwe”.

Ignoring reality and the consequences of Mugabe’s brutality, spokesman Dujarric went on to say that “the United Nations remains strongly committed to supporting Zimbabwe in its efforts to promote inclusive stability, sustainable development, democratic governance and human rights”.

The reality is that neither Mugabe nor his successor, Emmerson Mnangagwa, has made any effort whatsoever to promote any of the policies mentioned above particularly with respect to democratic governance or human rights.

With a fawning statement that disgraces the American people, even the US Embassy in Zimbabwe insulted the victims of Mugabe’s reign of terror by failing to acknowledge his brutality and inhumanity. (Read it here and the response from Tucker Carlson)

So enamored were they by Mugabe, he was named as a goodwill ambassador by the UN’s World health Organization (WHO) because Zimbabwe was a country that supposedly places universal health coverage and health promotion at the center of its policies to provide health care to all. (See here)

The charity Physicians for Human Rights objected to his nomination stating that: “The government of Robert Mugabe presided over the dramatic reversal of its population's access to food, clean water, basic sanitation and health care,” the group went on to state that: “The Mugabe regime has used any means at its disposal, including politicizing the health sector, to maintain its hold on power.”

The report also said Mr. Mugabe's policies led directly to “the shuttering of hospitals and clinics, the closing of its medical school and the beatings of health workers”.

 Because the pattern was the same across Africa after the former white dominated regimes were removed from power, the actions of the terrorist leader Mugabe were all too predictable. After assuming power there followed the deliberate slaughter of his political rivals along with his tribal rivals and the imposition of one-party rule.

This ushered in a thirty-seven-year reign of terror marked by economic collapse, famine, election rigging and human rights abuses that are the hallmark of African dictators, which are deemed acceptable by the UN and the globalist elite.

The United Nations took no action when the self-confessed Marxist-Leninist, and admirer of China’s Chairman Mao, announced in advance that he was going to use force to seize the white owned farms for redistribution.

They took no action when the tyrant used his North Korean trained Fifth Brigade to slaughter tens of thousands of innocent Ndebele civilians to crush any opposition to his leadership. They did nothing when he violently suppressed opposition political parties and rigged elections to remain in power for thirty-seven long and bloody years. 

The response of the UN to the famine caused by the imposition of Mugabe’s Marxist ideology was to beg western nations to increase aid to Zimbabwe which in turn increased the dependency which endures to this day. While the world responded with food, farm equipment and money, Mugabe saw fit to invade neighboring Congo to steal its mineral wealth in order to pay the troops that kept him in power.

At the heart of every Marxist lies a hatred of America and Mugabe was no different. He rejected desperately needed food aid from America on the spurious grounds that it may contain items from genetically modified crops. His hatred for America took priority over the desperate plight of his starving people.

The entire Zimbabwean tragedy and the tolerance of tyrants like Robert Mugabe is evidence, if any were needed, that to the UN and the global elite the imposition of their ideological agenda takes a higher priority than the safety and well being of the people concerned.

In the case of Zimbabwe, the predicted famine, death, dictatorship and human rights abuses were a price worth paying to remove white people from government and eventually from the continent of Africa.

To conclude: As predicted the same fate is befalling neighboring South Africa, also as predicted, this is acceptable to the UN and the global elite because the removal of white people from government in Africa is the priority whatever the cost in blood, suffering and death.     

UN Looks Away As Commies Run Amok In Southern Africa - America Next

While the the world’s media is focused on bringing down the Trump administration and derailing Brexit in order to keep the British people locked into the European Union they have rejected at the ballot box, their most favored communist tyrants are running rampant in Southern Africa doing what they do best. i.e. oppressing and killing their own citizens.

At the prompting of the UN/EU world government the Marxist dictator of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, is declaring a state of emergency because a drought and subsequent famine is putting the lives of millions in jeopardy.

According to the UN/EU, declaring a state of emergency will speed up the flow of development aid into Zimbabwe which, as the world knows, is one of the most corrupt countries on the planet governed by a regime with a reputation for diverting foreign aid money into their personal bank accounts overseas.

This drought and famine should come as no surprise since it is one of the many that have blighted the country since Mugabe implemented his land and wealth redistribution program in line with his Marxist ideology.

It’s worth reminding ourselves that the former British colony of Rhodesia was successfully developed by the descendants of British settlers to become the bread basket of Africa and a net exporter of food as well as tobacco and other commodities.

This was until the UN and self-loathing ‘progressives’ around the world decided that handing the country over to a deranged Marxist tyrant and condemning the people to brutality, mass murder, poverty and starvation was preferable to a white government.

As a prelude to the second part of this article it must be noted that Mugabe - known locally as ‘Butcher Bob’ - began his oppression and killing spree in earnest when the people of Zimbabwe tired of his autocratic rule and the poverty it created and threatened to kick him out of office.

African dictators are not renowned for giving up office voluntarily due to constitutional requirements or by way of elections. On the contrary, when threatened with the sack by the people, they entrench themselves further by doubling down on oppression in order to remain in power.

The rest is history; ninety-three year old ‘Butcher Bob’ is still bloodletting and oppressing his people after thirty-seven uninterrupted years in office without squeak of protest or sanctions from the same UN and ‘progressive’ elite that works tirelessly against democracy in the USA, Great Britain and Israel.

The alarm bells should be ringing for the UN and the ‘progressive’ global elite where President Zuma of neighboring South Africa is responding to calls for his removal with a good old fashioned dose of repression along the lines of Butcher Bob next door.

He is planning to appropriate white farms without compensation for redistribution totally ignoring the catastrophic disaster which resulted from this same policy in Zimbabwe.

If the UN and the global elite truly cared about the well being of the African people they would not have deposed the white government in the first place but since they did they should now deploy all the power at their disposal to stop this Marxist corruptocrat before he completes the destruction of the country that began with Saint Nelson Mandela.
.
It is highly likely that the UN/EU axis and the global elite will ignore the looming crisis or blame it on the lingering legacy of apartheid for the simple reason that South Africa is the example they use to demonstrate the success of multi-culturalism over white governance.

In order to keep up the pretense of peaceful co-existence between races and tribes they will ignore the fact that years of widespread corruption and Marxist ideology has slowly degraded the most successful economy on the African continent to one that is now the recipient of foreign donations; which, as is the case in Zimbabwe, are redirected away from the poor, starving millions to Zuma and his cronies keeping them in the luxury to which they have become accustomed.

 They will ignore the fact that despite years of sanctions and isolation, Mandela and his communist controlled African National Congress (ANC) were given a developed country endowed with an abundance of natural resources along with a stable, successful economy thriving in all sectors. These included labour intensive industries such as coal and diamond mining, agriculture, nuclear development as well as the medical sector with it's pioneering heart transplant surgery.

They will ignore the fact that violence is endemic, especially inter-tribal violence against each other and xenophobic violence against immigrants from other parts of Africa. It is glossed over but the ordinary black African citizen is vehemently opposed to immigration to such an extent they will readily kill any immigrant if they believe he is taking a job from a local.

As is the case in the American inner cities and elsewhere, the UN/EU and their surrogates downplay black on black violence and ignore black on white violence as best they can. Conversely, white on black violence is played up and portrayed as evidence of white supremacy and inherent racism.

For the UN/EU axis and the global elite to admit that their Rainbow Nation has failed is an admission that their policy of imposed multi-culturalism has failed and this will have repercussions throughout the world including Europe and America.

Despite government censorship and intimidation of journalists in the developed world, images of rioting, violence and civil disorder are appearing in the public domain; it is all the evidence one needs to prove that open border mass immigration from the backward, undeveloped world into Europe and America is not only failing to produce peaceful multi-cultural societies but it is sowing the seeds of civil unrest which is rapidly developing into all out civil war.

Lionizing Cecil - No Lamentations For His Murdered Countrymen

Let me say from the outset that the killing of a magnificent beast like Cecil the lion for a trophy is an indication that some of our fellow human beings have no appreciation of Mother Natures' endless capacity for beauty, nor do they have any concern that they are robbing other human beings of an opportunity to view these animals in their natural habitat.

Rational people will understand that sometimes individual animals have to be culled in order to preserve the genetic diversity and general health of the pride, in that case it can be done the natural way by introducing a younger male to evict the incumbent leader, or the humane way by shooting.

Four bolts from a cross-bow, with an armed guide as back-up in case of a miss, is not going to be the most popular method of animal husbandry in this age of soppy animal worship.

That said, the reaction to the demise of Cecil must give grave cause for concern, least of all because of the mass hysteria it has engendered across the comfortable parts of the world. In the rest of the world where it isn't quite so comfortable they couldn't give a rats a*se about the unfortunate Cecil.

Dignified mass mourning at the death of a prominent person is a mark of respect in the civilised world and is quite normal, but this is being slowly replaced by public outpourings of uncontrollable emotion that can only be described as mawkish mass hysteria.

This phenomenon is common in the less civilised parts of the world such as North Korea or Iran, where emotional immaturity manifests itself by a lack of self control over ones public actions.

 In the more civilised parts of the world this mass emotional insecurity started in earnest with the death of Lady Diana and has now become a universal reaction to the passing of prominent people, especially celebrities, whether they deserve adulation or not.

The emotional reaction to the death of a human or an animal is highly selective and dependent upon the celebrity status of the deceased; it is this selectivity which is rightly bringing charges of gross hypocrisy upon the public mourners, especially the more prominent ones.

It must be understood that some unscrupulous celebrities will jump on any passing bandwagon if it gets them into the public eye, with a view to keeping the royalties rolling in, but serial high profile animal defenders such as Ricky Gervais, Brian May and Ginger Spice et al. deserve an extra dose of opprobrium for their unadulterated hypocrisy and disregard for lives of innocent men, women and children in Cecil's home country of Zimbabwe and elsewhere.

It's only right and proper that these celebrities speak up against animal cruelty but it is also incumbent upon them to use their celebrity status to speak up against people cruelty and denigrate its perpetrators with the same venom they spat at Cecil's killer, Mr. Walter Palmer.

One lion is no comparison to the thirty thousand or more innocent people massacred by Robert Mugabe in Metabeleland as he consolidated his position as Zimbabwean Prime Minister in April 1980.

Since then he has waged war and committed atrocities in neighbouring Congo and destroyed the country's agricultural base using the resultant starvation as weapon to control his internal enemies.

Ricky Gervais and his pals could be forgiven if these events, which occurred before their time, had been consigned to history but they haven't; Robert Mugabe is still there in Zimbabwe, brutalising, starving and killing his enemies with the full knowledge of the international community including the UN and the EU.

As a measure of the dedication of the UN and the international community to human rights, they appointed Robert Mugabe, known by his own people as 'Butcher Bob", as an Ambassador for Tourism as part of their World Tourism Organisation.

The emotionally retarded celebrity Jimmy Kimmel, choked up live on air as he described the death of the lion as a 'disgusting tradegy' while the equally retarded model Cara Delevigne went completely over the top ranting that Walter Palmer should have his citizenship taken away.

If they had any sense of decency or common humanity, Jimmy Kimmel and Cara Delevigne would lead a celebrity campaign on behalf of the dead and dying people of Cecil's homeland, but the silence is deafening. Animals mean more than starving children in the eyes of the modern celebrity and their followers.

In conclusion, the global hysteria surrounding the death of Cecil the lion and the corresponding silence on the starvation and deaths of tens of thousands of his fellow citizens is a sad indication of how the priorities of humanity have shifted from the serious to the frivolous; by drawing attention to the actions of Walter Palmer while by turning a blind eye to the actions of 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe shows just how desensitised and callous the human race has become.

Black Anti Immigrant Violence In South Africa - Multi-Culti Epic Fail

Despite its disastrous effect on every aspect of peoples lives, anyone who merely questions the British government's policy on immigration is immediately smeared with labels such as racist, bigot or xenophobe - with Fascist and Nazi sometimes thrown in for good measure.

However despicable, this is a tactic used by the government and its supporters in their effort to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on the British people at the behest of the UN/EU.

With the anti-immigrant rioting by black people in South Africa getting ever more bloody this tactic has become somewhat hypocritical, not that this will bother a shameless political class. More importantly their failure to condemn the rioters using the same labeling blows their self adopted moral superiority clean out of the water.  

Nobody with a grasp of world events over the past half century will be surprised that the predictions of all the non-'progressive' political commentators on the planet have been proved right and the self appointed guardians of morality proved wrong.

When the Marxist orientated political activists and their army of bureaucrats at the United Nations appointed themselves the de facto world government, the well being of the global population would always take second place to their political ideology.

This was no more apparent than in Africa. The world government in New York dictated that white governments were to be replaced by black governments despite the warnings that this would spell disaster for the people.

They wouldn't countenance a  program of educating, and subsequently integrating, suitable people into government over a long period of time, decolonisation had to be achieved at the earliest in order to satisfy their political bigotry.

The UN remained unmoved when the predicted disasters - which included famine, civil wars and other human catastrophes -  blighted millions of people when the British and other European colonists were ordered to give up their African possessions.

Their appointment of a psychopathic Marxist dictator, Robert Mugabe, in neighbouring Zimbabwe who, as predicted, proceeded to slaughter tens of thousands of his own people then turn the bread basket of Africa into a famine zone, didn't prevent them from repeating the exercise in South Africa.

(It's worth reminding ourselves that they are unable to acknowledge their failure in Zimbabwe and as a consequence Butcher Bob Mugabe is still there today some twenty eight years after starting his bloody reign of terror, looting and murdering with little or no sanction from the UN)

The one thing the UN ideologues did learn was to accompany their diktats to hand over power with a massive propaganda campaign based on a moral basis for their demands while painting a Utopian picture of a future 'multi-cultural society'.

Despite all the gory images coming out of South Africa, they are unable to accept the utter failure of their multi-cultural project. They persist in projecting South Africa as the Rainbow Nation where racial discrimination is a thing of the past and all the people, regardless of race, religion or skin colour, live side by side in perfect harmony each respecting the other.

It's worth noting also that all the morally superior activists, including politicians, sports people and publicity hungry celebrities who were most vociferous in their condemnation of white South Africans have gone silent as their non white client group goes on a blood soaked rampage based on immigration.

These same activists who continue to smear ordinary decent people in Great Britain as racists, Fascists and Nazis for having the temerity to peacefully question mass immigration are duty bound to voice a similar opinion on their black brothers and sisters in South Africa who killing over the same issue.

What is happening in South Africa is a clear demonstration that:

a) there is no such thing as a 'multi-cultural society", it is the figment of the imagination of political ideologues.

b) imposing 'multi-culturalism' on a reluctant people without their consent will end in violence and bloodshed.

c) politicians can not legislate for people to love each other and get along.

d) the UN is no longer fit for purpose and should be replaced with a non-political organisation dedicated to achieving peace through good governance and protecting individual liberty.  

UN Imposed Multi-Culturalism - Civilisation Itself Is Diminished

When United Nations super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland appeared on the BBC some time ago and  talked about the need for the European Union to 'undermine national homogeneity', one cannot be sure that the viewing public, let alone the public at large, realised the enormity of what he was saying.

A former head honcho at BP and Goldman-Sachs, he appeared under the guise of the UN sponsored Global Forum on Migration and Development. Like the modern day professional politician, it is unlikely that career bureaucrats such as himself has spent any quality time in the real world of the people who suffer the consequences of what they impose.  

In the minds of Sutherland and the global elite, all the problematic conditions that resulted in conflict and two world wars stemmed from the hegemony of what used to be known in leftist circles as the WASP,  the White Anglo Saxon Protestant. The usual buzzwords such as imperialism, colonialism, nationalism, inequality and the like, would all be laid at the door of the WASP.

WASP morphed into an catch-all term used to describe all people who were white with a Judaeo-Christian heritage.

With the growing influence and power of the UN came the global super bureaucrat of whom Peter Sutherland is the latest manifestation. What started as a noble effort for the worlds nations to take action in preventing wars, the UN as effectively abandoned this noble ideal and now sees itself as the world government.

What we are seeing today is the ongoing UN project to re-order the post-war world according to their vision alone, excluding everyone from outside their exclusive circle.

'Un-homogenising' as they like to call it, consists of replacing the traditional ways of life of WASP dominated cultures with so called 'multi-cultural societies'.

It has already been achieved in South Africa and Zimbabwe with disastrous consequences and it is well advanced in the Anglosphere. It is currently being imposed in Europe with equally disastrous consequences.

With two years left of his final term, President Obama is determined to finish 'fundamentally transforming' America by destroying the WASP dominated heritage of the American people. He is doing this with all the intensity of a scorched earth policy.

The borders are deliberately left open, illegal immigration is actively encouraged with amnesty and citizenship being the ultimate reward.

From five to a possible eleven million new non WASP citizens is tranformational in the extreme.

Career politicians and professional bureaucrats spend their lives in each others company, only interacting with like minded people who can comprehend a particular theory, a political philosophy or a policy and niothing else. Consequently they know very little about the real world inhabited by real  people who will suffer the practical reality of what they impose.

If they do understand the practical reality of what they impose then obviously they don't care, their re-ordering of global society is all that matters. The ending of white rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe was the aim of the UN regardless of the disastrous consequences they knew would befall the people.

The fact that the so called multi-cultural 'Rainbow Nation' has descended into a hellhole of tribalism, poverty, starvation, violence, rape and murder is of no consequence to people like Sutherland and the political elite. As long as the project to end white rule was achieved, then all's well that ends well.
 
Likewise in Zimbabwe with the installation of 'Butcher' Bob Mugabe, the UN's favourite Marxist dictator. The country, together its industries, its economy and its peace, has been totally destroyed but that's ok at least the white man is longer in charge.

Civilisation in South Africa and Zimbabwe has not been advanced by UN action but diminished.

The chosen method for 'undermining national homogeinty' in Europe is to impose a mythical 'multi-cultural society' via open border mass immigration combined with rigidly policed political correctness and anti-indigenate laws.

Some laws, such as hate crime laws, equality laws, animal welfare laws and child protection laws are selective, applying to indigenes only.
 
Since it is a practical impossibility to raise living and cultural standards in some parts of the world up to WASP levels, Sutherland and global elite are imposing global finacial and cultural equality by:

a) Redistributing wealth by a combination of foreign or development aid.

b) Transferring manfacturing industries and technology to the third world via the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO)

c) Redistributing wealth using the goverment sponsored perversion of science called Man Made Global Warming. Since there hasn't been any for two decades they shamelessly re-named it 'Combating Climate Change' and carried on redistributing taxpayers money regardless.

d) Instigating a cultural and demographic replacement policy by encouraging open border mass immigration from backward, incompatible cultures. These cultures are encouraged not to integrate while the indigenous population are cohersed into accepting them, together with some of their barbaric practices, under threat of prosecution.
     


With the 'un-homogenising' of Great Britain being the prime objective - as opposed to the wellbeing of the people - Peter Sutherland and the global elite will not be the slightest bit concerned that their so called multi-cultural society consists of thousands of mono-cultural, violent, crime ridden, welfare financed ghettoes that are unrecognisable as being British.

                                                                  

As is the case in Southern Africa, British society, along with its civilsed culture and its benign way of life has been downgraded and diminished so that career politicians and agenda driven professional bureaucrats can feel self satisfied that their 'progressive' re-ordering of the world is being achieved regardless of the cost to civilised standards.

Mugabe Steals Zimbabwe Election - Business As Usual For The Aid Industry

The fact that the present disaster in Zimbabwe is of the western worlds making is studiously ignored by current commentators who are trying to distance themselves from their action of putting 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe into power.

According to these commentators, the Prime Minister, Ian Smith, was an out of date colonialist from a bygone age for wanting to maintain living standards in Rhodesia and for wanting to fight the communist insurgency that was ruining the economies of the neighbouring countries.

Ian Smith and the rest of the informed world knew what the result would be of handing over power to the Marxist led liberation movements but then, as is the case today, political ideology took precedence over the well being of the people. Ian Smith's successful leadership led to high literacy rates, record levels of employment, a surplus of agricultural products for export and ' not a single empty belly'.

With the collusion of the western leaders, Rhodesia went on to be fundamentally transformed by its Maoist leader, Robert Mugabe, from the breadbasket of Africa to the basket case of the world, within a decade or so.

The descent into the abyss began when the world's progressive hierarchy at the time, including British socialist Prime Minister, Harold Wilson and the American global troublemaker Henry Kissinger, forced Ian Smith to start the process of handing over power to the black majority who were not prepared or equipped to handle political power.

White minority rule offended their perverted sense of justice despite the economic success of Ian Smith's leadership and the threat of a disaster under a communist black leadership.

Regardless of any negotiated outcome and with complete disregard his for his reputation for lunacy, the worlds progressive leadership wanted Robert Mugabe in charge from the outset. He was their chosen man.

At the negotiated Lancaster House settlement, an interim power sharing government was set up until elections could be held; these were eventually held and won by the moderates led by Bishop Abel Muzorewa. That victory should have signaled the start of a new era of self determination in the newly decolonized African states. With encouragement and western support the newly created Zimbabwe could have remained the bread basket of Africa to the benefit of the entire continent.

To Kissinger, Wilson and the rest of the 'international community', Bishop Muzorewa, being a Christian and pro-western, was not deemed African enough to satisfy their progressive vision of independent African nations led by proper Africans. In an act of treachery which has gone unpunished to this day, they undermined Bishop Muzorewa's administration by refusing to recognize his government and left crippling economic sanctions in place; in effect they engineered its downfall.

Unsurprisingly Mugabe and the rest of the revolutionaries continued the war and as history shows us they eventually usurped power to the rejoicing of the west.

In an attempt to disassociate themselves from the consequences of their treachery, these same 'progressives' and their descendants claim that nobody could have predicted Mugabe's behavior prior to his anointing.

This is nonsense as any junior student of African history will know. Robert Mugabe was an unashamed disciple of Mao Tse Tung from the start of his political career. His vision for Zimbabwe was stated clearly in 1975 during his exile in Mozambique.

"a new progressive society could not be constructed on the foundations of the past and they would have to destroy most of what has been built up after 1900 before a new society, based on subsistence and peasant values could be constructed".

This statement cannot be mis-interpreted into anything other than what it is. It is classic Maoism as put into practice by Pol Pot and the Kymer Rouge in Cambodia. The western 'progressive' leaders knew this when they chose him to be their man in Southern Africa.

Peter Hain, the coward who abandoned his South African comrades to their fate when he ran away to Great Britain, was a Mugabe supporter from the start.

This political low life is quoted as saying; "Throughout the 60's and 70's, I demonstrated for an end to the Ian Smith white regime. I was delighted when Robert Mugabe won the elections in 1980".

Peter Hain must have been equally delighted when Mugabe began his reign of terror not long after his anointing when he sent the infamous North Korean trained fifth brigade into Metabeleland to massacre any opponents to his rule. Twenty thousand people or more, including women, children, the old and the sick were raped, tortured and butchered with the full knowledge of the Western leaders. There were no sanctions imposed on Mugabe for this genocide as was imposed on Ian Smith for his successful running of the country.

On the contrary, he was feted by adoring academics from Great Britain and America as if there were no massacre in Metabeleland. Over the mutilated bodies of the slaughtered he was given an honorary degree by the University of Edinburgh in 1984, by the University of Massacheusetts in 1986 and by the University of Michigan in 1990. And to her eternal shame he was even knighted by the Queen in 1994.

Hain and his ilk cannot claim surprise when their man did what he promised he would do prior to his election.  He set about fundamentally transforming Zimbabwe into a country based on "subsistence and peasant values".

Since 1980 Robert Mugabe, the 'progressives' choice for Zimbabwe, has been a classic blood soaked African dictator, rampaging through his country, looting, pillaging, killing and above all rigging elections so that his reign of terror carries on interminably. That's thirty three years where the west has stood by and allowed this disaster to continue.

Where, might one ask, was the United Nations or the Organisation of African Unity? They have intervened in Sierra Leone, Sudan, Libya and other places but turned a blind eye to their boy in Zimbabwe. They even managed to ignore his invasion of the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo where he looted its mineral wealth for himself and his cronies.

Regardless of Butcher Bob's carnage and the overwhelming evidence that giving aid to Zimbabwe is doing more harm than good, the Aid industry cannot find a reason to suspend giving this beast shed loads of taxpayers money. See here how Mugabe and his henchmen, including his opponent Morgan Tsvangerai abuse British taxpayers money. Even by British MP's standards, 1.2% of total public expenditure on foreign trips is a bit excessive.

With the re-election of Mugabe for another five year term in what was a standard African election, i.e. rigged from start to finish, what can the long suffering Zimbabwean people expect from the current batch of western leaders?

Not a lot by all accounts.  Peter Hain, the South African coward and former British government minister is trying to distance himself from Mugabe but as usual he is all hot air and obfuscation. He is also busy doing what he does best, that is stabbing the loyal people of Gibraltar in the back by siding with Spain in the current border dispute.

'Oh how the mighty have fallen' is apt when referring to the current political class in the once 'Great' Britain. The rattle of a sabre by a British Foreign Secretary would have been sufficient to bring any misbehaving dictator into line, but the current incumbent couldn't frighten a kitten with his pathetic utterances. William Hague warns of "grave concerns" over the recent poll where the hated Mugabe got 61% of the votes. That will have Butcher Bob quaking in his boots as he settles down to another banquet in one of his foreign aid financed mansions while his people starve.

The people of Zimbabwe have been abandoned by the western leaders because, despite their weasel words, Butcher Bob Mugabe is still their boy. They chose him, they groomed him and they were instrumental in putting him into power.  After thirty three years of indulging his butchery they are hardly likely to dump him now.

French State Is Bankrupt While Zimbabwe Has $217 In The Bank

To the horror of  'progressives' the world over, the governments of France and Zimbabwe have demonstrated within hours of each other that geographic location is irrelevant when it comes to the economic facts of life.

Both countries have proved that government control of the economy, i.e. socialism, always ends in bankruptcy and economic hardship for those outside the political class.

Despite government friendly media whores in both countries the truth has found a way out.

Zimbabwe, as the informed people of the world are aware, is run by the Western approved socialist madman 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe. This is the tyrant responsible for turning the mineral rich breadbasket of Africa into an impoverished hell hole of starvation, disease and bloodshed.

As the world is also aware 'Butcher Bob' has the habit of murdering anyone who criticises his misrule therefore Zimbabwean Finance Minister, Tendai Biti put his life on the line when he confirmed to the world that after paying the civil servants, the country only has $217 (two hundred and seventeen) in the bank.

He added that the people in the briefing room probably had more money in their wallets than the country had in the bank.

This disaster is a direct result of 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe's 'progressive' policy of redistribution of wealth; mainly land, from the job and wealth creators to the poor without any concern for whether they had the skills to manage such enterprises.

Also, as is typical of  'progressives',  Mugabe also redistributed wealth to his cronies, donors and political supporters. (Does that remind my American friends of anyone?)

Simultaneously in Paris, the French Employment Secretary, Michael Sopin, echoed Tendai Biti by announcing that the French state is bankrupt. The French State still exists, he is quoted as saying, but it is bankrupt.

Sopin goes on to say that the tax and spend policies of President Hollande's socialist government are not working.

The government spin machine and the supine French media have gone into overdrive in an attempt to limit the damage.

In an echo of the Obama spin machine, President Hollande's apologists have tried to blame the previous administration of Sarkozy. (It worked for Obama so why not give it a try)

The most pathetic response must go to French Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici who claimed that Sopin had misspoken and what he had meant to say was that "the fiscal situation is worrying" .

That statement is taking socialist imbecility to levels previously unexplored in all written history.

As the informed people of the world predicted when Hollande was elected, his promises to raise taxes and increase entitlement benefits would lead to financial collapse and bankruptcy but being a socialist he refused to listen.

Hollande in common with all socialists is so addicted to his ideology that he is incapable of rational thought.

Despite all the  warnings and empirical evidence that his socialist policies would make France's perilous economic situation infinitely worse, Hollande fulfilled his promises to increase taxes including a 75% tax on the 'rich' and to extend unfunded entitlements.

As predicted, inward capital investment dried up together with tax revenue. Upper income tax payers led by film mogul and entrepreneur Gerard Depardieu jumped ship to more tax efficient countries.

The response to this economic disaster is pure socialist stupidity.

Hollande plans to cut government spending by $51 billion and increase taxes by $20 billion.

(The French national debt is fast approaching $1 trillion)

No politician induced crisis would be complete without a suggestion from the loony Greens. The Environment Minister, Delphine Batto is going to help solve this crisis by switching off the lights.

Not only will this save money, Batto is quoted as saying, but it will cut down on light pollution and improve the nation's sleep patterns. I don't know why Hollande didn't think of this before.

The lessons to be learned by the intellectually challenged 'progressives' of the world is that socialist induced bankruptcy and poverty is not confined to African dictatorships like Zimbabwe as I'm sure the people of Greece, Ireland, Spain and now France can confirm.