Barack And Dave - Appeasement Won't Save Us From Radical Islam

Watching the performances of British Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama one would be forgiven for coming to the conclusion that they are positively lightweight when compared to statesmen like FDR, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill.

Bearing in mind that both sets of leaders were fighting a global war against a determined and ruthless enemy, making a comparison is justified but excruciating to endure.

Comparing the PR executive Cameron with the battle hardened soldier and statesman is grossly unfair to Churchill and an indictment of the British political system. To think that a media created PR man can attain the same office as Sir Winston is an abomination of the mind.

I assume the same is being said about a community organiser attaining the same office as accomplished statesmen such as FDR, Truman or John.F.Kennedy.

Watching the ongoing appeasement efforts currently being undertaken by the Obama/Cameron administrations I have no confidence whatsoever that the war against radical Islam and a possible nuclear armed Iran will be won any time soon. More importantly I have less confidence that we will be handing over a better or safer world to our children than the one from just a couple of decades ago.

As opposed to the previous war leaders, Obama and Cameron are committed to their 'progressive' ideology and crippled by political correctness to the point where they can barely name the enemy that is committing unspeakable atrocities across the planet. Nor can they condemn the wider religious ideology that commands the jihadis to commit such horrors in its name.

Despite the torture, beheading, rape and murder being carried out in the name of their god, Allah, as commanded by their prophet, Mohammad, and as written in their holy book, the Koran, Obama and Cameron continue to insist that Islam is a 'global religion of peace' on the spurious grounds that the perpetrators are a minority.

Using Obama and Cameron's logic, because the majority of Germans did not support Hitler or the Nazis during World War II, National Socialism was also a 'global religion of peace'.

Neither Churchill, FDR nor Truman had any such reservations when talking about Hitler and his gang of murderous thugs nor did they fail to condemn the Nazi ideology they used to justify their murderous rampage across Europe.

Unfortunately Cameron's ability to deliver a spin doctor authored speech in perfect, well spoken English can fool an audience into believing what he says, but his record in office reveals him to be something entirely different.

He earned the moniker 'Cast Iron Dave" because he gave the British people a cast iron guarantee that he would give them a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty but, in what would become his modus operandi, he reneged on that promise when his aim had been secured.

Like President Obama, David Cameron is a self confessed 'progressive' who is also committed to imposing the global reform agenda on behalf of the UN/EU.

One only has to look at the machinations undertaken by both of these organisations to get an idea of what they are trying to achieve. The number of malicious resolutions condemning Israel compared to those against the serious human rights abusers in the middle east is a clear indication of UN/EU's intention to eliminate the Jewish homeland.

The refusal to eliminate ISIS using the same overwhelming force that defeated Saddam Hussein's massive, battle hardened military machine in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan, is a craven concession to the millions of Muslims who are effectively a fifth column in Great Britain and America.

To radical Islamists and jihadis, appeasement is perceived as weakness which only emboldens them to commit further acts of barbarity in pursuit of their caliphate. Despite the reality of the current bloodshed in the middle east, the attraction of ISIS to western educated men and women remains undiminished.

Hundreds of thousands of British and American Muslims support ISIS and hundreds, perhaps thousands, are prepared to give up their relatively comfortable lives in the west and risk death and destruction in some miserable desert cesspit on behalf of their god.

Appeasement takes many forms, from unrestricted mosque building to tolerating barbaric practises such as misogyny, child marriage, paedophilia and female genital mutilation to name but a few. At the same time as the Judeo-Christian heritage of Great Britain and America is being systematically erased at home, Christian communities as old as the Faith itself are being ethnically cleansed from the middle east.

Perceived to be nothing more than college kids, Obama and Cameron have already been given a humiliating lesson in geo-politics by Russia's President Putin and Syria's President Assad, watched closely no doubt by the Ayatollahs in Iran, ISIS and other radical Islamists around the world.

Looking at current events it's obvious that the world is an ever more dangerous place and will remain so all the while that the so called 'leaders of the free world' continue to appease Islam at home and abroad in pursuit of their cultural and religious equality agenda.

Appeasement will not replace 'shock and awe' as an antidote to radical Islam and while the Ayatollahs in Iran and ISIS rub their hands with glee, Churchill, FDR and Truman are spinning in their graves.

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity".

"The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome".

Sir Winston Churchill



  

Echos Of Churchill - Ignore Netanyahu At Your Peril

Making comparisons between world leaders is controversial and fraught with danger due to the polarised political preferences of their supporters and detractors. Looking at recent events in the middle east the controversy around comparing Israeli Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, President Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron, can be all but removed.

He may not have reached the stature of Sir Winston Churchill but judging by his pragmatic approach to Iran and global Islamic terrorism he is head and shoulders above the current candidates for the leadership of the free world, the aforementioned Obama and Cameron.

The similarities between Netanyahu and Churchill became abundantly clear after his recent prophetic speech to the American Congress while his contrasts with Obama and Cameron became embarrassingly more stark.

Netanyahu warned the world about the danger of a nuclear armed Iran in the same way that Churchill warned the world about German re-armament prior to Word War II. Then as now, the appeasers and collaborators ridiculed the messenger which consequently condemned the world to a prolonged and destructive war resulting in some forty million dead, around half of them civilians.

He warned the world that the ruling despots of Iran are insane enough to use nuclear weapons to precipitate a war with the aim of erasing Israel and the Jews from the face of the earth and setting up a caliphate. This echos Churchill's warning that Hitler's true motive for re-armament was to start a war with the aim of setting up a Jew free, thousand year Reich in Europe.

The administrations in the White House and Downing Street have either learned nothing from history or they are appeasers in the mold of Neville Chamberlain.

These administrations are doing the same thing today with the Ayatollahs that Chamberlain did with Hitler and the Nazis. He came away with the Munich Agreement written on his infamous piece of paper that guaranteed "peace in our time".

The only thing it guaranteed was more time for Hitler to continue building up his forces and acquiring modern weapons before he annexed Austria, invaded the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia and Poland, exterminating their Jewish populations as he progressed eastward.

Prime Minister Netanyahu's impassioned warning not to trust the Ayatollahs fell on the deaf ears of the appeasers in the White House just as Churchill's warnings about Hitler and the Nazis were ignored by Chamberlain and the appeasers in Westminster.

Churchill's "sinews of peace" speech - perhaps better know as his "iron curtain speech" - delivered at the invitation of President Truman in Fulton, Missouri warned the world about the malign intentions of post war Russia to spread communism around the world.


The reaction to his speech wouldn't go amiss among the naive socialist/communist/progressive community of today. He was denounced as a warmonger and accused of insulting and denigrating a friend and ally. The great man was right, an iron curtain did indeed descend across Europe and fifty million people lost their lives as a result.

 Like Churchill before him, Natanyahu's pronouncements on the enemies of civilisation are dismissed as warmongering and an obstacle to peace in the middle east by the appeasers, the collaborators and the facilitators of Islamification around the world.  

In conclusion: Sir Winston Churchill was right in his day about Hitler and Stalin just as Netanyahu is right today about the Ayatollahs and radical Islam. If history repeats itself then millions of civilian casualties will be the legacy of the appeasers, the collaborators and the facilitators who refuse to learn the lessons of the past.