Conservatives and Marxists Singing from The Same Hymn Sheet

Watching the choreographed jousting by the politicians in Westminster one would think that the ideological divide between the supposedly capitalist Conservative Party on one side and Marxist Labour Party on the other was too wide to be bridged.

Spin and deception over honesty and substance is now the norm in politics as the ruling elite try to hoodwink the electorate in order to impose their agenda.  

One must ignore the spin, the speeches and the rhetoric and pay attention the policy details of both parties to see they share a common agenda.

Although they claim otherwise the Conservative Party has long since abandoned capitalism, individual liberty and small government as a means of increasing the wealth of the nation to bring prosperity to its citizens. Instead they have become a party of social justice and government-imposed equality and fairness like their supposed ideological enemies.

If the gaggle of candidates jostling to replace the appalling Theresa May are anything to go by the British people are doomed to a future of high taxes, high spending and big government in a country crushed by rigidly policed political correctness.

The leader of the pack for the future leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister of Great Britain is the dripping wet liberal and social justice warrior, Dominic Raab. His campaign tag for his leadership campaign is “For a Fairer Britain” which is an echo of the Labour Party tag for the 2010 General Election “A Future Fair for All”.

On the biggest single issue of the day Raab has given little indication that he will fulfill the mandate given to the political class and free Great Britain from the European Union and its undemocratic, centralized institutions.

As Secretary of State for Exiting the EU he was responsible for negotiating Great Britain's withdrawal but he was comprehensively outmanoeuvred and humiliated by a group of dedicated Europhile civil servants who were determined that the country should remain. 

Instead of killing off Theresa the Appeaser’s failed and discredited Withdrawal Agreement he thinks he can negotiate changes that will be acceptable to Parliament and the people. This is something the EU bureaucrats have made abundantly clear they will not contemplate. 

He is repeating Mrs. May's dishonest mantra that we will be leaving the EU on the, 29th March 12th April, 31st October with or without a deal.

In line with the policy of Jeremy Corbyn's Marxist Labour Party, it looks likely Great Britain will remain locked into the despised EU should Dominic Raab take the helm.

Ignoring the wishes of the people, and in line with Labour Party policy, Dominic Raab intends to keep fire hosing 0.7% of Great Britain’s Gross National Product (GDP) on giveaway aid to foreign dictators.

While public services and infrastructure is starved of cash at home, this irresponsible largess is running at fourteen billion pounds per year and due to deficit budgeting every penny is borrowed and must be paid back with interest. With the national debt at record levels that interest bill alone comes to some forty-eight billion per year.

In common with the Labour Party, Raab plans to continue with the anti-science climate change nonsense which is killing energy dependent industries at home costing jobs directly and indirectly while increasing fuel bills for everyone. 

This is putting pensioners and the less well off into fuel poverty where they are forced to decide whether its heat or eat.

Raab has given no indication he intends to put clear blue water between himself and the Labour Party on the burning issues of mass immigration, imposed multi-culturalism and forced acceptance of Islamic practises.

The wet-as-lettuce former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and David Cameron were forty-three and forty-four years of age respectively when they assumed the Premiership, and both proved to be complete and utter disasters in office. It’s fair to assume that the forty-four-year-old lawyer turned politician will also be too inexperienced to become a successful Prime Minister.

In conclusion, the signature policies of these ideologically opposed parties are so similar the consequences of their implementation will be exactly the same. High tax, high spending, high regulation, mass immigration and Islamification in country dominated by political correctness and still members of the hated EU.  

Lying Politicians - It Doesn't Get Worse Than This

Politicians telling lies to win an election is a recent phenomenon. In a more innocent era telling the truth was a virtue drummed into children by a generation of God fearing parents. Telling lies, even the tiniest little fib, was frowned upon attracting immediate punishment along with threats of more blood curdling punishments in the hereafter.

Sadly these are not so virtuous times and we are worse off for it. Lying has been normalized by a  political class who consider it to be a legitimate tool to use in the pursuit of power.

No one is surprised when a politician is caught lying, instead we expect it of them. It has become so bad that we assume they are lying every time they open their mouths to speak.

We also assume the heartfelt promises made during an election campaign will be broken the moment the last votes are counted and the gravy train pulls out of the station.

In a bygone age a politician caught in a lie could expect sanctions at the very least or an end to their career at worst. Now there is no sanction so they lie as a matter of course and go without punishment free to carry on with their deceit.

This assertion will undoubtedly attract accusations of exaggeration or hyperbole but I encourage the viewing of a short montage the evidence of which should keep old Nick busy when these charlatans finally shuffle off their mortal coils.

The Brexit referendum and its aftermath has brought out the worst of the political class, they are completely and utterly without shame.

Every politician in this montage, which includes former Prime Minsters and Government Ministers, has done exactly the opposite of what they promised during the referendum campaign. Watch and despair.


Liars The Lot Of Them - Broken Promises  

The image above is Sir Nick Clegg. He was the former Deputy Prime Minister under David Cameron and a former leader of the Liberal Democrat Party.

A committed globalist, he was a consummate and pathological liar of the very highest order and does appear in the montage. He was the former Member of Parliament for Sheffield Hallam but was voted out in the general election of 2017.

One would think that with his record of shameless lying he would be unemployable but he was snapped up by Mark Zuckerberg and is now employed by Facebook in California, USA. 

 

Brexit Wars - The Establishment Strikes Back

As the people of France, the Netherlands, Ireland and Greece can attest, the European Union (EU) does not do democracy. All have had their referendum results ignored or overturned at a second ballot because the ruling political establishment didn't like the outcomes.

These countries were fortunate enough to have been allowed a referendum in the first place as most other EU countries have had their requests for ballots refused. This includes Great Britain where all three of the legacy parties have promised EU referendums in past election campaigns then reneged when the election is over.

The recent referendum on whether Great Britain should leave the EU was a ploy by the ruling political establishment to block the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip) who despite concerted media campaigns of smear, vilification and demonisation continued to attract popular support.

With the EU descending into economic disaster for the majority of people and their lives blighted by open border mass immigration, Ukip support culminated in victory at the last EU elections and attracted four million votes at the last General Election becoming the third largest political party in the country.

For students of politics, the British EU referendum is a case study in modern day election strategy and a blueprint for future ballots. It was a classic example of electoral fraud, deliberate distortion and lies along with hideous bias by the bought-and-paid-for media whores, including the taxpayer funded BBC.

Aptly described as Project Fear, the Remain side had unlimited resources at their disposal to deluge the electorate with threats of economic and social Armageddon if they voted to take their sovereignty back and become a self governing nation once again.

The British people saw through it all and unequivocally voted to reject Project Fear and take their country back from the unelected bureaucrats of the EU and the UN based global elite.

Armageddon as promised by Project Fear failed to materialize therefore Project Remain has been implemented. The leader of Project Fear, Prime Minister David Cameron, had no alternative but to resign; it's architect however remains securely in position.

Exposed during the campaign as an inveterate liar and cheat, senior Bilderberger and Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, is in a position to obfuscate and delay, possibly indefinitely, the Brexit process should it ever get going in the first place.

The race to replace Cameron has been the most revealing consequence of the Brexit vote and it serves as an example of the power the ruling elite can wield in order to get their operatives into power and engineer the outcome they desire.

By a process of elimination only Conservative Members of Parliament get to decide which two candidates to replace Cameron will go forward to a ballot in the constituency parties at large. All the supporters of Brexit save one were eliminated, some by their own hand, leaving Brexiteer Andrea Leadsom and the pro-EU establishment candidate, Theresa May.

Leadsom was the popular choice while May is a detested establishment automaton and accepted by the informed commentators as the worst Home Secretary in recent history.

Leadsom has promised to start the Brexit process immediately by triggering what is known as Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty while May has said she will prevaricate without justification. Firstly to the end of the year and more recently into 2017.

Leadsom was a clear and present danger to the Remain side and the EU project in general and had to be eliminated from the race before the vote went to the constituency parties at large. The trap was set by the Rupert Murdoch owned Times newspaper using a bought-and-paid-for media whore named Rachel Sylvester. She lied about instigating comments made about motherhood by Leadsom and as May is childless spun the comments as derogatory.

The subsequent over-the-top media firestorm against Leadsom was blatantly co-ordinated and achieved the desired result whereby Leadsom was hounded out of the contest. This left the accession to power of Theresa May a mere formality without a single popular vote being cast.

At this moment in time the Brexit process is under the control of a Europhile Cabinet led by an establishment Europhile Prime Minster who replaced another establishment Europhile Prime Minster both of who are totally committed to the United States of Europe project.

Both Houses of the Westminster Parliament, the Commons and the Lords, are overwhelmingly Europhile and they are claiming the sole right to trigger Article 50 with many claiming that the referendum result is non-binding and should be ignored completely.

The United Kingdom Independence Party that campaigned over decades for this referendum has been excluded from the Brexit process entirely.

In conclusion, the referendum result is becoming irrelevant as Project Remain reaches full speed. Like it is with Climate Change propaganda, every negative consequence in the country at present from the value of the Pound Sterling to a supposed increase in racial incidents are being blamed on the Brexit vote.

The pro-EU establishment have seized control of the government to go with their control over Parliament in general, the government-media axis and more importantly the entire Brexit process.

The electorate are in control of nothing therefore their wishes will be studiously ignored as usual.  



 

Brexit - Remain Campaign Uses Murdered MP As Ballot Fodder

Just when we think that politicians, aided and abetted by their bought-and-paid for media whores, can't sink any lower they go and prove us all wrong. The Remain campaign in the run-in to the up and coming British EU referendum have shamelessly politicized the murder of Member of Parliament, Jo Cox, and reduced her life to nothing more than a campaign leaflet or a bumper sticker.

The cold, calculated playing on the emotions of a shocked nation to gain political advantage is beyond cynical; it displays the win-at-all costs fanaticism of the modern day career politician. To put it mildly it's the 'never let a serious crisis go to waste' attitude on steroids. (See here)

The unfortunate lady's body was still warm when the Remain side campaign director, Will Straw, spotted an opportunity to gain electoral advantage then proceeded to politicize her death for use against the Vote Leave campaign. Bearing in mind the lady was the mother of two young children, using her death as ballot fodder is especially callous and heartless. (See here)

More concerning is the fact that no dirty trick or tactic, even murder, is off limits when there is cause to champion, an ideology to impose or an election to win.

Will Straw is known as one of the Red Princes of British politics; these are the spawn of prominent Labour Party Members of Parliament who follow their parents footsteps into far-left politics, keeping the family tradition alive and kicking.


British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has disgraced his noble office and reduced himself to a low grade propagandist by joining the odious Straw in the fetid swamp of modern day political campaigning.

With no intention to disrespect the murdered victim, Jo Cox was an obscure backbench Labour MP with little or no notable achievements other than being a passionate campaigner for her 'progressive' agenda.

It is only right and proper that fellow Members of Parliament lament her passing but the high profile, mawkish display by Members from across the political spectrum became an unedifying spectacle designed to increase emotions before linking her death to the Brexit campaign.

Incidentally, it's worth mentioning at this point that the murder by immigrants of ordinary, law abiding British citizens going about their daily business never attracts the same level of attention from these same MP's. On the contrary, under the new communications policy being implemented with vigor across the EU, these crimes are being censored.

Anyone having the temerity to publicise these murders, and other heinous crimes such as rape and violent assault, are smeared as racist and accused of indulging in so-called 'hate speech'. In the near future this will render them liable to prosecution under malignant 'hate crime' laws.

Murders such as that committed by Marusz Florowski, a fugitive Polish gangster who used a blowtorch to murder his victim. Or the brutal murder of an elderly couple by the evil Ireneusz Bartnowski, another violent Polish immigrant.

If the Jo Cox murder could solicit such an emotional response from her fellow MP's then the murder of fourteen year old Alice Gross deserved similar attention. Her young life was brutally taken away by Arnis Zalkalns, a convicted murderer from Latvia who had already murdered his wife before being given refuge in Great Britain. (See here, here and here)

These murders are being censored and those that publicize them are being smeared, harassed and threatened because they are a direct result of EU membership and a blight on the Remain campaign.

There are other dangerous repercussions of using murder to influence the polls that does not bode well for future election campaigning or for democracy itself.

If it is correct that the murder of Jo Cox has had the effect of reversing the polls whereby the Remain side has overtaken Brexit and could win them the election, then who's to say that some unfortunate innocent won't get bumped off in future if an election is at stake. After all the ends justify the means in modern win-at-all-costs elections.  

In conclusion; across the Atlantic Fox Business News' Stuart Varney, host of the popular 'Varney and Co' has been continuously referring to the murder of Jo Cox as a 'political assassination' throughout his Friday three hour long morning show, drawing the conclusion that this has boosted the Remain campaign and could win them the election. As a consequence this reversed the decline in the markets with an increase of a 100 points or more.

Varney ignored the fact that this murder was carried out by a man with a long history of mental illness and persisted with using the incendiary term 'political assassination'. That not only subliminally linked it with the Brexit campaign but also raised the spectre that a strategic murder can have intended consequences for the financial markets where billions of dollars are at stake.

The Remain campaign are callously playing on the emotions of a stunned electorate by blaming the Brexit campaign for the murder of Jo Cox then urging them to surrender their centuries old democracy to unelected foreign bureaucrats because that what she would have done.

Shameless, utterly shameless.

Hitler's Plan For Europe - EU Supporters Re-Writing History Again

When former Mayor of London and leading campaigner for Great Britain's exit from the European Union, Boris Johnson, reminded the electorate that attempts to force the independent nation states of Europe into one centrally controlled country had been tried many times previously, including by Hitler, the manufactured outrage was laughably predictable.

Member of Parliament Johnson, an Oxford University Classical scholar and historian, merely pointed out that previous attempts by the Romans, Napoleon and Hitler to forcibly create and dominate a single European state have all failed because there has been no desire for it by the various peoples of Europe.

He made it absolutely clear that he was not making a direct comparison between the current political elite and Hitler's henchmen but pointing out that they were trying to achieve the same goal but by different methods.

The howls of outrage from EU supporters, and the usual suspects from the socialist/liberal/self loathing community, was so obviously manufactured it failed to take into account the actual realities of history. The faux outrage was surpassed by Labour MP and Shadow Foreign Secretary, Hillary Benn, who claimed to be 'offended' by the centrally controlled superstate comparison.

(A potential Foreign Secretary that denies the veracity of recent history for political purposes doesn't exactly fill one with confidence but it is par for the course in the modern far-left community)

(Boris Johnson exonerated here)

Hitler's plan for Grossgermanisches Reich or Greater Germanic Reich is well documented whereby he envisaged a German controlled Europe from the "the Urals to the Atlantic".

At worse this behaviour is denying history, at best it's re-writing history. Any student of politics will be well aware that this denial and re-writing of history is standard operating procedure not only for tyrants but also for the modern day members of the aforementioned socialist/liberal/self loathing community along with the agenda driven political elite.

The vision of the Greater Germanic Reich of a European state has been resurrected by none other than British Prime Minister and European superstate fanatic, David Cameron, when he addressed, and deliberately misled, students in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan.

Read this in a previous article "An EU From The Urals To The Atlantic - Fulfilling Hitler's Dream" here

An All Powerful Elite Are Wilfully Destroying Western Civilisation

If anything epitomises the fall of a once great civilisation then the Parthenon in Athens is a classic example. It is a visible symbol of the decay that can befall any civilisation when it takes for granted the benefits of its success and ceases to nurture the things that made it exceptional.

External enemies are the obvious threat but more insidious and corrosive are the enemies within, slowly but incessantly chipping away at the institutions and culture that evolved over two millenia and surreptitiously undermining the very foundations of the country to which they claim allegiance.

The slow, deliberate degradation of western civilisations by internal enemies acting on behalf of the UN/EU ruling elite has suddenly changed from the generational process it has employed up until now into a scorched earth type dash to destruction as the people wake up to their plan and rebel by rejecting the establishment politicians and switching their allegiance to more popular movements.

It's worth noting that all the countries that are being 'fundamentally transformed' against the wishes of the majority and disfigured beyond recognition are not third world dictatorships or oligarchies but prosperous, free and open multi-party democracies, with supposedly independent judiciaries along with guaranteed freedom of speech.

It's a measure of the weakness and fragility of the democratic structures in western countries when Presidents and Prime Ministers can usurp power then use it to wilfully destroy their own countries and civilisations with very little opposition or sanction.

When Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the borders of Germany to unlimited immigration she was well aware that under the EU's core policy of the free movement of people she would be flooding the rest of Europe with a deluge of poor economic migrants, many of whom she knew would be incapable of integration or supporting themselves and their families.

She and the other EU leaders were also aware that it would 'fundamentally transform' the individual nation states of Europe for the worse and most likely forever.

The news bulletins are awash with images of the deluge overwhelming countries like Greece, Italy, Austria et al with children, sometimes lifeless, being used by a cynical media to stoke up sympathy and emotion.

To compound the distortion they continue to push the falsehood that it's a 'refugee crisis' as opposed to an economic migration by freeloaders looking to take advantage of the generous taxpayer funded welfare benefits along with free housing, free health care, free schooling and all the other 'free stuff' that is the hallmark of the European socialist dystopias.

There is also the issue of terrorists posing as refugees but rape, sexual assault and the death of innocents is obviously considered a price worth paying in order to advance the cultural replacement agenda.

Another powerful weapon being used in this cultural replacement agenda is Islamification. This is being imposed using rigidly policed political correctness, together with one way hate crimes which are applicable to the indigenous population only, and a propaganda campaign to smear, denigrate and intimidate anyone who opposes the destruction.

It needs to be understood that the UN/EU owned political class don't do compassion, they could care less about the disenfranchised, the poor, the hungry and those millions who have been abused by their own governments. If they did they wouldn't have tolerated and done business with tyrants like Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Libya's Colonel Gaddafi, Syria's Assad, and all the other autocratic Sheiks that have ruled the Middle East and other Islamic countries for generations.

If they did care they would not have tolerated and done business with the African despots that have brutalised their populations since independence and looted their countries treasuries while their people have suffered pestilence, famine and horrific tribally based civil wars.

They tolerated these tyrants and ignored the abuse of their own citizens for decades because it was in their interests to do so. Likewise their interference to eventually topple these leaders suited their purposes also. The UN/EU, and their bought-and-paid-for politicians, knew that overthrowing these tyrants would result in instability, insurgencies, death and destruction and an outflow of refugees.

Despite being a middle eastern problem where there is plenty of oil money and infrastructure to absorb their co-religionists, it is being touted by the media, and a host of multi-millionaire celebrities, that it's a European problem many of who's countries are plagued with bankruptcy, poverty and a crippling lack of infrastructure or resources to deal with it.

(Muslim demand separate state in Norway here)

The political class were also well aware of the reputation of western countries for welfare benefits; housing, schooling, health care and lots of other 'free stuff' being widely available which would act as an irresistible attraction to those seeking a better life or a free ride.

Their agenda to re-order the post war planet based on national, cultural, religious and ethnic equality takes priority over absolutely everything and they don't intend to let anything get in the way of its implementation. The European Judeo-Christian societies and their diaspora are not just the target of their malevolence but their sworn enemy.

In case they haven't noticed the lack of action with their porous borders and illegal immigration it's worth pointing out to the American people that the biggest European Judeo-Christian society on planet is their own United States of America and they are the biggest target of all. It's inconceivable that a prosperous European Judeo-Christian diaspora in the USA can be allowed to continue and act as a contrast to a downgraded 'multi-cultural' Eurasia where the Greek disaster will be the standard for the other nations.

Such is their determination to transform Europe for ever this malevolent political class are overlooking the brutalisation of their own people by violent, sexually depraved immigrants who consider rape, including male and female, adults and children, as normal.

As the abused people of Europe wake up to the monster deliberately placed in their midst, their rulers have taken a leaf out of the tyrants handbook and are using censorship, hate crime laws, propaganda and intimidation to impose their agenda once and for all.

Immigrants crimes including violent assault, rape and murder are being systematically covered-up to prevent a backlash, but by all accounts a backlash is coming slowly but surely.

(Article on Swedish censorship here)

The meeting between Chancellor Merkel and Facebook founder Paul Zuckerberg who were caught discussing censoring any criticism of Islam or open border mass immigration is testament to this intent. Media censorship however is a topic for another day.

In conclusion, if anyone is in any doubt that this catastrophe is a deliberate, well planned policy to ethnically cleanse the Judeo-Christian cultures from Europe and the diaspora and replace them with so called 'multi-cultural societies' then I would highly recommend taking time to watch the video at the end of this article.

There are no gory or graphic images of atrocities only a commentary with some high quality images and video of the immigrant invasion of Europe along with contributions from German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and British Prime Minister, David Cameron, among others, along with the frightening intentions of the immigrants themselves.

Of all the videos I have watched on this topic this was by far the most chilling and the most disturbing.

Watch the video here

Win The War But Lose The Peace - This Is What Surrender Looks Like

When German Chancellor, Angela Merkel refused to allow British Prime Minister David Cameron to act in the interests of Great Britain by reforming the rules for immigrant welfare claimants unless British low paid workers were punished in return, it was a stark reminder that the German Chancellor has as much power over the British people as Cameron or any other elected Member of Parliament.

The reform was intended to stop Great Britain's generous welfare entitlement system being a magnet to economic colonists from around the world who risk life and limb to claim their free money and which has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and their way of life.

An even bigger disaster has been Merkel's open border immigration policies combined with the new quota system which Cameron is powerless to stop. This is designed to speed up the process of cultural and demographic replacement and the imposition of so called 'multi-cultural societies' on Great Britain and the other nation states of Europe.

Despite having the fastest growing population in Europe, Merkel and the EU bureaucrats have unceremoniously torn up Cameron's deal on asylum and are imposing quotas on Great Britain way in excess of the countries' ability to absorb them all.

By any measure this is not in the interests of the British people and only serves to undermine their safety, security and future prosperity. Therefore one is bound to ask what is the point of having a British Prime Minister and an elected Parliament when they are unable to act in the best interests of the people they have sworn to protect?

Modern students of history should study how a country that was roundly defeated in two world wars - the second of which left its cities, industry and infrastructure so utterly devastated its a wonder they survived - could rise up from the ashes and conquer the victors without a shot being fired.

The Marshall Plan rebuilt their devastated infrastructure however it was not needed to rebuild their ambition to dominate Europe because, as current events clearly demonstrate, that was never defeated.

It's astonishing how a British Prime Minister can be so weak and craven that he tugs a forelock to a German Chancellor who is well on the way to completing the vision of her predecessors, including the Kaiser and Hitler, to build a German dominated, Jew free Europe from the Atlantic to Urals.

The memory of those hero's who made the ultimate sacrifice in these two destructive wars to keep Great Britain free and sovereign has been desecrated and despoiled by a treacherous political class who are intent on surrendering everything they died for.

Despite attempts to disguise the federalist aspirations of the European Union it is now common knowledge that the EU project from the outset was to abolish the independent sovereign states of Europe and replace them with a single state using the old Soviet Union as a template.

           

In many ways the United States of Europe is a sick parody of the United States of America whereby many of its historical symbols were hijacked in order to foster the impression they are similar entities. Hence the EU has 'Founding Fathers' and 'Constitution' along with Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches.

All phony of course because in reality the whole show is run by the unelected, unaccountable  European Commission which in turn is totally dominated by the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.

A dedicated communist party apparatchik from the former Soviet puppet state of East Germany, Merkel is no friend of individual liberty, free enterprise or democracy and has a particular distaste for, and animosity towards, Great Britain and it's people. 

Her utterances and actions are proof positive that Angela Merkel despises the British people's attitude and lack of conviction toward the European superstate project and as a consequence she takes it out on David Cameron by indulging in his public humiliation whenever he shows any sign of standing up for the British people he has sworn to represent.

Faced with this emotionless, agenda driven automaton it is vital that the British people have a representative that will put their interests above all other considerations, especially their safety, security and economic well being. They also need this representative to protect their culture, their heritage and their way of life.

What they've actually got is David Cameron, a craven careerist who has a lack of dignity and self respect and allows himself to be dominated and bullied not only by the German Chancellor but by other members of the EU politburo such as 'President' of Europe, Jean-Claude Junker, a career bureaucrat from Luxembourg and another 'President' of Europe, Donald Tusk from Poland.

Mentioning David Cameron in the same sentence as Sir Winston Churchill is akin to blasphemy but inevitably comparisons will be made; it is however an exercise in futility as there is no worthwhile comparison that can be made.

While Sir Winston was a loyal servant of the people - steadfast and resolute in defence of Great Britain, along with it's heritage and way of life, David Cameron is the polar opposite who is actively engaged in surrendering all that Churchill and the British people fought for in two world wars.

What makes it incalculably worse is that he is surrendering it all to an enemy that was defeated at such a terrible cost.

While Churchill is quoted as saying that "If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, she must always choose the open sea". David Cameron was quoted as saying only recently that "he feels deeply European from the bottom of my heart".

He has also vowed to fight with his heart and soul to keep Great Britain inside this undemocratic German dominated superstate no matter what.

As the engineered 'refugee crisis' continues to blight the lives of the British and European people with rampant violent crime including rape and murder, Cameron and the elite show no signs abandoning their superstate project and this can only result in conflict as the people take it upon themselves to protect themselves and their communities.

Although it is censored by the government-media complex, many towns and cities across Europe are on fire as people rise up against the political elite including Cameron and Merkel.

Looking forward into the not too distant future, the intransigence of this political elite with respect to using open border mass immigration to achieve cultural and demographic replacement, it is putting the peace of the entire continent at risk.



    

Insulting Our Intelligence With Blatant Lies And Propaganda

I am sure he spoke for millions of us when British journalist and author, Peter Hitchens, eloquently stated that 'sharks bite, cow pats stink and politicians lie. I'm used to all these things. They're facts of life. But I can't stand it when people pretend otherwise". He made this observation in reference to the British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne's risible claims of success in the face of disastrous economic indicators and a dire economic performance.

Although there is an endless procession of politicians who lie and deceive as a matter of course, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, takes some beating. On a variety of subjects from economic performance to immigration and multi-culturalism, his pronouncements have become desperate and demonstrably false.

As these falsehoods become ever more risible he is insulting the intelligence of all bar his army of dullards by assuming people will actually believe him.

The British people are well aware that Cameron's only function in life is to keep Great Britain inside the European Union and to implement their cultural replacement agenda using open border mass immigration.

Conversely, Cameron is aware that a majority of the British people are now against continued membership of the EU and it's long planned destruction of the British way of life. Particularly galling is the Islamification program and his continual acceding to the incessant demands of the Muslim colonists no matter how offensive they are to British sensitivities.

The New Years Eve sexual assaults of women in German cities brought to light the horrific rape epidemic perpetrated by Muslim colonists that has been engulfing Europe for decades and this has made EU membership even more unpopular and the resistance to mass immigration solidify as well as becoming more widespread.

As Mr.Hitchens' rightly observes, politicians lying is a 'fact of life' and like him people 'can't stand it' when they pretend otherwise. Cameron's latest outrageous pronouncement is designed to appease the real concerns of the British people as opposed to being a genuine policy he intends to implement.

It relates to the continued influx of incompatible, and in many cases illiterate, Muslim immigrants from the undeveloped world who will make no contribution to British life.

In addition they will be a burden on the social services and other taxpayer funded resources that have already reached the breaking point due to the unprecedented demand caused by the massive influx which has proved impossible to assimilate.

He promises to spend $30 million of taxpayer's money on English language classes for non English speaking Muslim spouses immigrating into the country in order to help them make a contribution to the economy and lessen their susceptibility to radicalisation. If they are not proficient in English after a set period of time they may be deported.

(See here)

This insult is so far from being a pragmatic policy it's bordering on delusional; if he is serious then he should be sectioned along with his handlers and the spin doctors, media managers and advertising executives that come up with this nonsense.

Cameron is well aware that as a consequence of surrendering the sovereignty of Great Britain to the European Union he has surrendered the ability of the Home Secretary to deport undesirables whether they are legal or illegal and regardless of any crimes they have committed.

Instead of insulting the intelligence of the British people, David Cameron, his handlers or any member of his government, need to explain how, if he cannot deport terrorists, murderers, rapists, and a multitude of other violent criminals, how will he be able to deport a housewife because her proficiency in English is not up to scratch?

One also has to bear in mind that any Muslim spouse from the undeveloped world over the age of puberty will have produced a brood in the intervening period and therefore cannot be deported due to her right to family life under the notorious Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.

This appalling insult to the intelligence is compounded when one looks at some of the high profile failures of his government to deport the criminals alluded to above.

For example, Cameron's government failed to deport an Ethiopian immigrant know as J1, a terrorist colleague of the infamous ISIS killer, Jihadi John, along with twenty-eight other terrorists. This includes Algerian, Baghdad Meziane who had links to the al-Qaeda gang involved in the Paris massacre. He also ran a network that supplied fake passports and credit cards to jihadis. He was convicted a decade ago but remains free to walk the streets of Leicester, England, without fear of deportation.

(See these stories here and here)

Nigerian immigrant, Akindoyin Akinshipe was jailed for the rape of a thirteen year old girl but the European Court of Human Rights forbade his deportation because, as the court claimed, they must protect his 'social ties' with Great Britain which grew while he resisted deportation.

(See that story here)

The British High Court refused permission to deport Jamaican murderer, Eric Erron, on the spurious grounds that he was born out of wedlock.

(Story here)

Finally, in 2012/13, 602 appeals by foreign criminals were allowed by the immigration courts with 324 allowed to stay because of their so called right to family life.

(Story here)

The British people now take it as a matter of course that David Cameron, along with his government and their spin machine are lying whenever they are pretending to address their concerns about the destructive effects of open border mass immigration; the unfortunate truth is that they are totally committed to the EU project of replacing the independent, sovereign states of Europe with a post democratic superstate.

This will include what is known as cultural and demographic replacement using open border mass immigration with the objective of creating a generic European citizen loyal to the EU as opposed to their individual nation states.

The course is set and looks to be unstoppable and as a consequence the lies and propaganda will continue unabated. They are utterly shameless and unless the peoples of Europe wake up very soon all will be lost and two millenia of history will be destroyed for ever.

Bombing Syria - Precision Munitions Miss By Two-Thousand Miles

Listening to the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, make the case to Parliament for bombing Syria one would be forgiven for thinking that Syria based ISIS killers are an imminent threat to the British people and if they remain unbombed carnage in the homeland will ensue. One would also be forgiven for thinking that Syrian President, Bashir al-Assad, became a murdering tyrant overnight and therefore must be deposed immediately.

This nonsense falls apart under the most cursory examination and it is typical of the spin doctor authored speeches that Cameron is able to convincingly deliver with his perfect well practiced diction.

Firstly, Bashir al-Assad has been a murdering tyrant for the past fifteen years and his father Hafez al-Hassad for thirty years before that with no mention of regime change; it's more than coincidence that he must be deposed now only after gaining the support of Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who's ambitions in the Middle East are seen as a threat to western interests.

Secondly, and more incredulous, is Cameron's assertion that only by bombing Syria can the British people be made safe from ISIS killers. It needs to be made absolutely clear that murder and mayhem on the British mainland has been committed in the past, and most likely will be committed in future, either by born and bred British Muslims or imported Muslim terrorists who have been given British citizenship without proper vetting.

If precision munitions need to be dropped on potential killers of British citizens then they need to be dropped two thousand miles closer to home on the radicalising mosques and madrassas that operate unhindered in the myriad of sharia controlled ghettos that churn out ISIS activists and sympathisers by the thousands.

The truth is that the Royal Air Force can flatten every ISIS controlled city or facility in the entire Middle East and it won't make the British people any safer from violence or death perpetrated by Muslims as demanded by their prophet Mohammad and as written in the Koran.

As a matter of fact many British born and foreign British documented Muslims have said in the past that bombing their brothers in the Middle East is one reason for their radicalisation and their support for ISIS.

Three of the 7th July London Transport bombers were born in West Yorkshire, England of Pakistani parents with the fourth born in Jamaica and raised in West Yorkshire.

The brutal killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby in a London street was carried out by British born sons of Nigerian immigrants.

In contrast, the 21st July London bombers consisted of one British documented immigrant from Ghana, West Africa, one from Eritrea, two from Somalia and three from Ethiopia which included two women.

One of these bombers, Muktar Said Ibrahim was given British citizenship despite a record of gang violence, armed robbery and sexual assault. ( See a previous article on Ibrahim here)

Mohammed Emwazi, better known as Jihad John was a British documented Kuwaiti raised in Great Britain from the age of six.

The British government grants citizenship to anywhere between 150,000 to 250,000 immigrants per year without proper vetting.

Neither David Cameron nor the British people have any idea how many radicalised Muslims there are in their midst waiting to deal death and destruction in the name of Allah. Cameron and his government absolutely refuse to tackle the Muslim institutions that act as a breeding ground for radical Islamists, which includes mosques, madrassas and prisons.

To conclude, there hundreds, perhaps thousands, of jihadis and ISIS activists already in Great Britain ready and waiting to cause murder and mayhem, therefore it is incumbent upon David Cameron to explain to the British public how bombing Syria or Iraq would have prevented the atrocities carried out by these home grown and foreign born jihadis in the past and how bombing them today will prevent further atrocities in the future.

The UN And Cultural Genocide - The Puppet And The Puppet Master

Let's be clear and unequivocal from the outset, an integral part of the post war reordering of the planet by both the United Nations and the European Union includes the removal from power and influence of predominately white people who share a Judeo-Christian heritage.

It should be obvious by now that the so called refugee crisis which has dominated the global bought-and-paid-for media has been long in planning; it has been brilliantly coordinated and flawlessly executed.

This mass influx of third world, mainly Muslim, economic migrants into Europe combined with imposed quotas for each country guarantees that the generational project to replace the individual cultures of the European nation states, along with their Judeo-Christian heritages, with artificially constructed 'multi-cultural societies' will pass the tipping point and become irreversible. 

Even now as the truth emerges that only one in five of those swarming into Europe are refugees fleeing the Syrian civil war - the rest being economic migrants from a variety of countries and continents including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Africa - they persist with calling it 'the refugee crisis'.

One only has to follow the agenda of the de facto world government at the UN, along with its European subsidiary in Brussels, to see this tragedy for what it is. It also reveals the callousness and the fanaticism of the key players along with the depths they will plummet to achieve their goal.

The UN/EU bureaucrats and their propaganda machine use the politically correct term of 'unhomogenising' to describe their cultural replacement agenda. To that end they dispatched their super bureaucrat and senior Bilderberger, Peter Sutherland, to tour the capitals and legislatures of Europe advising the various political establishments to "undermine national homogeneity".
(See here)

Even by the UN's own criteria this undermining of national homogeneity is in fact cultural genocide, at least within the spirit of its Articles and Declarations.
(See here)

Great Britain's Prime Minister, David Cameron, is the archetypal modern politician. He possesses all the attributes he needs to deceive enough of the electorate into believing he represents their interests and can be trusted with their safety and well being.

In actuality Cameron is a self confessed 'progressive' who is totally dedicated to the UN and the EU, along with their cultural replacement agenda. He represents the UN and the EU in the Westminster Parliament, not the British people.

When UN or EU bureaucrats make any demand on Cameron, whether it be increased contributions, an increase in immigrant quotas or welfare entitlement policy, he makes an initial high visibility pretence at being tough for the benefit of his home audience before quietly complying at some later date.

Instead of asking the obvious questions regarding the unhomogenising propaganda of Peter Sutherland and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Cameron merely repeats their nonsense, almost by rote.

( David Cameron on unhomogenising here)

Sutherland and the UN/EU propaganda machine push the line that the future progress, security and and prosperity of the British people, and those of the other European nation states, is being hindered by their lack of diversity and their homogeneous, mono-cultural societies.

This justification for cultural genocide of the nations that advanced civilisation from the dark ages to the modern world, raises multiple questions that need to be addressed by Ban Ki-moon, Peter Sutherland, David Cameron along with all the other advocates of the UN/EU cultural replacement agenda.

If progress, security and prosperity is impossible to achieve in the homogeneous, mono-cultural nations of Europe, how is it that the same doesn't apply to homogeneous, mono-cultural nations such as Japan, China, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Ban Ki-moon's own country of South Korea?

Also, if these same immigrants are essential for the future prosperity of the developed world, how is it that their home countries have not progressed but remain backwards and undeveloped?

It is now universally accepted that imposed multi-culturalism using open border mass immigration has been a complete and utter disaster for the peoples of Great Britain and Europe. Cameron, Sutherland et al, need to explain how tens of thousands of impoverished, crime ridden, welfare funded, mono-cultural ghettos, with their violent turf wars could possibly be vital for the security or the future prosperity of the European people?

How can the barbaric customs of incompatible, backward cultures from the undeveloped, uncivilised world add anything to western civilisation let alone guarantee their future security and prosperity?

How can importing female genital mutilation, paedophilia, incest, child marriage, honour killings, spousal abuse, homophobia, beheading and mutilation complement British or European culture?

How can Sharia law or the violent exhortations to dominate all other cultures, as written in the Koran, be compatible with the European people, their way of life or their Judeo-Christian heritage?

They are obviously not compatible and never will be therefore the UN/EU elites have decided, without consultation, that Islam will gradually supersede the Judeo-Christian heritages of Europe as part of their cultural replacement agenda.
(Listen to David Cameron on Islamification here)

If, as the UN and the EU claim, that this is a humanitarian crisis of Biblical proportions, why is it that the burden is being put solely on the people of Europe and the Anglosphere to take the brunt of it?

Admittedly it was exacerbated by western interference, but this remains a Middle Eastern problem concerning mainly people of the Muslim faith, therefore why aren't the oil rich countries of the Middle East, including the Gulf States, dealing with it or at the very least alleviating the suffering of their coreligionists?

Why is the UN's Ban Ki-moon putting pressure on Europe and not the rest of the nations that make up his organisation to take their 'fair share' of refugees?

Why is Saudi Arabia offering to fund mosque building in Germany and Europe but refusing to take their fair share of immigrants or to fund their rehabilitation in Europe?

The answers are blindingly obvious; the cultural genocide by mass immigration being imposed by the UN/EU has caused opposition to the European project putting it's continuation at risk. The lack of democratic means to address this disaster has seen an increase in violence and the rise of patriotic and nationalist parties.

This threat to their generational project was viewed with horror by the UN/EU elites with the distinct possibility that their prize could be lost at this late stage. Something needed to be done to push cultural replacement past the tipping point and what better way was there than opening the borders to all and sundry.

The usual tactic of demonisation and smear is being deployed with venom against any person or party that questions or opposes this cultural genocide and open border mass immigration. The rising tide of opposition is being labelled as the rise of the 'far right' and adherents are smeared as bigots, fascists, xenophobes and Islamophobes along with the overused but predictable favourite 'racist'.

Everyone outside of the agenda driven, global 'progressive' establishment, along with their collaborators in the media and the self loathing community, see this crisis for what it is; a deliberate and final push by the UN/EU to replace the successful, centuries old Judeo-Christian cultures of Great Britain and Europe while downgrading the standards of civilisation with the intention of finalising their project to impose the equality of nations and cultures.

British Independence Surrendered Using Lies, Deceit And Treachery

                                       German Chancellor with British Gauleiter David Cameron

There was a time in the not too distant past when children were brought up to believe that lying was one of the most damnable sins possible, almost as heinous as murder itself. Those involved in bringing up a child, including parents, neighbours, teachers , Sunday School superintendents and the local Bobby, were consistent in embedding the message that lying was supremely bad.

Lying was a means of persuasion exclusive to crooks, cheats and vagabonds of all persuasions; the threat of eternal damnation being no deterrent for those who lived dishonest lives on the fringes of society and endeavored to take advantage of the decency of their fellow citizens.

In those innocent days nothing hurt more than being lied to, whether it was the disappointment of being taken advantage of or the realisation that a person in position of trust had betrayed that trust for their own personal ends.

As we know to our cost those days are long gone.  In this modern age of the professional generic politician, lying is an acceptable means of gaining and the holding on to power. The 'ends justifying the means' extends to all political parties as they fight to impose their ideologically driven agendas.

The long suffering British people have been the victims of serial lying since the then Prime Minister Edward Heath, surrendered British sovereignty using a premeditated tissue of lies. With malice aforethought Heath and his collaborators, deceived the people, took them for fools and rendered them powerless in the face of their historical enemies and subject to a hostile bureaucracy bent on the destruction of their nation.

                                                     Heath Signs The British Death Warrant

Lying through his teeth, Heath declared that those who feared that going into Europe would mean a loss of independence and sovereignty were completely unjustified. Heath and his political descendants have been lying to the British people ever since.
(Leo McKinstry article on EU lying here)

It is now an accepted fact that the creation of a post democratic superstate had been the intention of the politicians from the beginning with the surrendering of sovereignty to be achieved by a series of treaties. Each treaty was to be falsely promoted as a tidying up exercise or having an economic benefit with the object of creating the superstate without the people realizing what happened until it was too late.
(Fredrick Forsyth on superstate lies here)

This was lying on a monumental scale by the agenda driven political class and its like minded cronies in the establishment.  It was willful deceit in pursuit of their political goals.

In  the hope of a plumb position in the new superstate, a consummate and practiced liar, Tony Blair negotiated Great Britain's final surrender with the Lisbon Treaty, again claiming it was a tidying up exercise as opposed to the final nail in the coffin of the independent nation states of Europe. Blair along with Cameron and the leaders of the other two parties promised the people a referendum before its adoption.

They were lying of course as we all knew they were and as things stand today, the British people have lost their independence without the promised referendum. Apart from the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), all party leaders are totally committed to the European superstate project and will make any promise, tell any lie and stab any back to make sure that the British people stay locked in the EU prison.

The actual deed of signing the Lisbon treaty fell to Blair's successor Gordon Brown, a sociopath who's lies were so audacious they were an embarrassment to anyone with an iota of decency. His excuse for denying a referendum was his infamous 'red lines' which he claimed rendered a referendum unnecessary. These were a series of opt-outs which supposedly protected British interests. What they were and where they are now is a mystery.
(Red Line stories here and here)

                                              Brown signs away Great Britain's Independence

The government at Westminster may have changed but the habit of lying to the British has not, in fact it is so embedded into everyday political discourse one has to accept that a politician is lying as a matter of course. The modern politician no longer engages in proper debate or speaks to the public as adults, they are totally controlled by media managers, spin doctors and image makers.

They talk in a series of centrally issued slogans and sound bites and are unable to respond independently to any topic relying instead on the 'line-to-take' dispensed by the duty spin doctor. Any appearances outside the remote incestuous world they inhabit is choreographed down to the minutest detail and this mainly consists of a set of contrived and often embarrassing photo opportunities.

In a desperate rearguard action to avoid defeat in the recent general election, the Prime Minister David Cameron and his then Deputy Nick Clegg took political lying to levels previously unseen. These two had zero experience in the world that normal people inhabit and live under the impression that PR and spin can fool all of the people all of the time.

Even though they know, that ever increasing numbers of people know that they are lying, they persist with their nonsense in the hope that they can fool enough people to mitigate their predicament.

Cameron continues to promise a renegotiation of membership terms despite the politicians and bureaucrats that control the EU, and therefore Great Britain, are unanimous that there will be no renegotiation, there will also be no repatriation of powers to Westminster.

He knows when he promises to curb immigration or prevent immigrant access to the people's welfare system that he will be not allowed to do this by his EU masters but he makes the promises anyway.

He also knows that any referendum on Great Britain's membership will be an exercise in deceit unprecedented in political history. In the unlikely event that the people voted to leave, Cameron's EU masters will ignore the result as they did the Irish and the Dutch.

The sad thing about the current political class is that they would get more credibility if they simply treated the British public with respect, displayed a little honesty and told the truth. The public know where the politicians stand on the main issues so they might as well stop lying and maybe, just maybe, their Creator, whoever they conceive him to be, will judge them well and forgive them for their life of lying, cheating, and deceiving the very public they have sworn to serve.

(Due to time constraints this is a re-edited post from last year)

Trumped - David Cameron And His Referendum Stitch-Up Is Exposed

If anyone has any lingering doubts that the current leadership of the political class are nothing more than puppets who have been meticulously trained in the dark arts of media manipulation and propaganda, then I suggest they follow the antics of British Prime Minister, David Cameron, as he continues with his EU re-negotiation/referendum confidence trick despite the fact that he's been rumbled.

Watching the carefully choreographed campaigns of the establishment controlled political class in the United States getting derailed by Donald Trump is a wonder to behold; watching the apoplexy of the useful idiots in the government-media axis is an even bigger source of amusement.

This includes Megyn Kelly and Dana Perino of Fox News, who can hardly contain their contempt for Trump largely because of his exposure of their preferred candidate, Jeb Bush, as nothing other than a bought-and-paid-for establishment puppet.

Fair and Balanced? You report we decide? You reported and we decided - with a few exceptions Fox News is just as biased toward the political establishment as the other networks.

For a little while at least, everything was going swimmingly; the meticulously planned, pre-packaged campaign strategies of the establishment candidates were seducing the electorate into believing that the fundamentally transformed and downgraded America is still exceptional.

Issues that were degrading life for ordinary Americans, such as being beaten, raped, robbed and murdered by illegal immigrants, along with continued impoverishment by joblessness etc. were being glossed over or brushed under the carpet until the explosive arrival of Donald Trump on the scene.

It is true that the issue of illegal immigration, and the horrific crimes committed by illegals, would not have the high profile it has in the campaign were it not for Trump; neither would the issue of sealing the porous border. The establishment and their candidates were preparing the collective American psych for an amnesty for all illegals thus changing the demographic and cultural balance for ever.

In other words, making the fundamental transformation of America permanent and irreversible.

It would appear that the Trump anti-establishment phenomenon has contributed to the awakening of the British people from their media induced slumber and opened their eyes to the dishonest and treacherous machinations of their own agenda driven political class.

Thanks to Donald Trump, and to a lesser extent the anti-establishment Labour Party leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn, it is becoming almost fashionable to confront, disbelieve and ridicule the political establishment. At long last the people are beginning to accept that politicians routinely lie without conscience and deceive as a matter of course.

Apart from the increasingly popular United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), and their leader, Nigel Farage, the British political class is totally owned and run by the EU controlled establishment.

All the main parties are committed to the post-democratic European superstate project, an important part of which is the cultural and demographic replacement of existing societies - referred to in the USA as a 'fundamental transformation' - using open border mass immigration, particularly from the undeveloped, uncivilised third world.

To say that the British people have been lied to about the true nature of the European project would be the understatement of the century. Lied to, not just by the government of Edward Heath who signed the original surrender document, but by successive generations of all parties right up to David Cameron today.

These charlatans have been consistent with the lie that surrendering the power loaned to them after an election to unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats is in the British people's best interests.
(Great article on EU deceit by Christopher Booker here)

Knowing that the replacement of the independent sovereign states of Europe with a post democratic superstate would be unacceptable to the various indigenous people, it was to be achieved "without the peoples of Europe realising what was happening, the plan was to be accomplished in successive steps. Each was to be disguised has having an economic purpose, but all, taken together, would irrevocably and irreversibly lead to federation". 

This quote has been attributed to EU founder Jean Monet and is now in dispute; what is not in dispute however is that the agenda and sentiments contained therein have been carried out to the letter; it is indisputable that the British people are still being lied to with reference to the EU by the establishment owned political class, including Prime Minister David Cameron.

David Cameron is the archetypal politician for the post democratic era; hailing from a remote elite, he was exclusively educated and he has never had a proper job in the real world inhabited by real people.

He has adopted the modus operandi of the career politician of saying one thing to one client group and something completely opposite to another, as well as lying through his back teeth to get elected. This is considered to be acceptable behavior by modern day career politicians but it will only last if people like Trump and Corbyn stay silent and allow them to get away with it.

Having complete and utter contempt for the people he is supposedly representing, along with their views, their hopes and their aspirations, is another essential virtue for career politicians of the Cameron ilk.

It is universally acceptance by all and sundry that there will be no re-negotiation of Great Britain's terms of membership nor any repatriation of already surrendered powers. That includes border control, immigration and asylum policy, control over welfare, taxation or the criminal justice system; David Cameron still insists on carrying on with the re-negotiation charade.

Cameron has re-iterated his absolute commitment to the EU superstate project and will not campaign for Great Britain's exit even if his own negotiation ends in failure. This position is not just amateurish but untenable and an indication Cameron's confidence that he can con the British people into remaining in the United States of Europe.

Cameron's referendum stitch-up is now being seen for the charade that it really is by an increasing number of cynical observers who are returning the contempt that Cameron has for them but in spades.

It has now been revealed that Cameron and his controllers are going to orchestrate a phony bust-up with the French, who will then appear to concede some reforms; these will be nothing other than meaningless window dressing designed to con the British people.

The phony bust-up will, of course, be portrayed by the bought-and-paid-for main stream media as a victory for Cameron over Great Britain's historic and traditional enemy in a cynical attempt to play on the people's sense of patriotism and garner a few more votes for his dishonest project.

With the aid of an endless supply of resources including money and manpower along with compliant, agenda driven institutions, such as the trade unions, the bailed out banks, bonus addicted industrialists, the NHS, the Quangocracy, the NGO's, the government-media complex, including the taxpayer funded BBC, the referendum campaign will be a veritable tsunami of pro-EU propaganda.

If the treatment of Nigel Farage in the last general elections is anything to go by, the 'No/Out' campaign will be demonised, belittled, insulted and smeared without mercy.

In conclusion: Increasing numbers of people have realised that Cameron's re-negotiation is a confidence trick and his phony referendum will be a stitch up from beginning to end.

With that said, the EU superstate fanatics in the British establishment have come too far along the road to lose their prize of total integration at this late stage, therefore they will pour every available resource into the re-negotiation confidence trick and the referendum stitch up in the hope that enough low information voters will remain ignorant and anti-establishment figures like Donald Trump will not emerge and wield influence to the detriment of their beloved superstate project.

Cameron's Plan To Defeat Muslim Extremism - Tickle Them To Death

Apropos a previous article with reference to the shock and surprise displayed by people when a supposedly average neighbourhood kid, Mohammad Youssef Adbulazeez, turns out to be a cold blooded killer on behalf of Islam - it's worth expanding on the subject further in light of British Prime Minister David Cameron's five year plan to defeat Muslim extremism in Great Britain.

The speech whereby he laid out the plan is itself proof positive that Cameron is not only a remote elitist with no idea whatsoever of the real world outside his choreographed political existence, it also proves his mendacity and willingness to deceive. At the behest of his UN/EU spin doctors he delivered a speech so full of multi-cultural platitudes and fabrications he painted a totally false picture of Islam in today's Great Britain.

Apart from the truth, another thing his speech does not contain is any concrete measure that will effectively stop Muslim extremism and its accompanying violence from turning huge swathes of Great Britain into outposts of the Islamic State.

One cannot formulate a plan to defeat Muslim extremism without first understanding its nature, its core tenets and the conditions under which it flourishes and grows.

In his analysis, Cameron has replaced the reality of welfare dependent Muslim ghettos, run by tyrannical medieval Imams who use the Koran and sharia law to subjugate their congregations, with fictitious multi-cultural communities where historical enemies who slaughter each other in the real world live side by side in peaceful harmony.

For any informed person the use of the usual spin doctor authored soundbites and slogans to promote the UN/EU multi-cultural agenda is nauseating as well as an insult to the intelligence.

Cameron's plan has them in spades, "British values" as well as the infamous "shared values" then there's "shared community", and "one nation government".

"..a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy.......open, diverse and welcoming".

And what about this piece of unadulterated nonsense:

"It is here in Britain where success is achieved not in spite of our diversity but because of it".

Listening to this one has to wonder how the British people managed to survive before the Blair government opened the borders to third world mass immigration in 1997.

David Cameron mentions, but doesn't elucidate on, the "profound contribution Muslims from all backgrounds and denominations are making in every sphere of our society".

There are successful Muslims in Great Britain who do make a contribution after a fashion, it would be folly to suggest otherwise but "profound contributions" and "in every sphere of our society"?

A little exaggeration goes a long way when one is trying to deceive his own people and the world at large by painting an entirely false picture of one's most valued client group.

(Read the transcript here)

This five year plan to combat Muslim extremism comes days after Cameron praised Great Britain's Muslim community in his Eid Mubarak message where he mentioned the gathering of some sixty to seventy thousand adherents who attended an open air prayer meeting in Birmingham. How many of that sixty or seventy thousand adherents, or the rest of the four million British documented Muslims for that matter, are Jihadi Johns or typical British kids in the same way that Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez was an all American boy.

Ten percent? twenty percent? ninety percent? David Cameron doesn't have the faintest idea, not the remotest clue. Despite ample evidence to the contrary, he is making the claim that all British documented Muslims are moderate, peace loving, loyal British citizens until they are radicalised by external  malign forces either over the Internet or via social media.

The truth is somewhat different to this deliberately false picture and not too difficult to understand; combating extremism is not too difficult either and certainly with tough, effective action it wouldn't take five years.

Cameron's plan is so weak and bereft of tough action, I can only imagine that the Jihadi Johns and Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez's of this world will be laughing all the way to the battlefields of Syria or the disarmed military bases in the USA.

These people are savages lacking any form of compassion or emotion, they are highly motivated to kill in the name of Allah as demanded by their Prophet and as written in the Koran. Cameron's plan is the verbal equivalent of tickling them to death.

His tough action over five years includes:

Allowing parents to remove the passports of their spawn if they want to join ISIS. Cameron obviously believes that by keeping motivated young Muslims with a blood lust and hatred for western civilisation inside the country they despise, they will suddenly become de-radicalised.

Giving taxpayers money to groups that are prepared to spread an 'alternative narrative'. If there are any such groups in existence who value keeping their heads attached to their shoulders, they will take the money and surreptitiously hand it over to the nearest ISIS recruiting centre.

New powers to tackle cult leaders and those who spread extremist messages. Judging by the way that Cameron's government arrests and prosecutes anyone who publicly opposes Islamification these powers already exist.

Encourage Universities to denounce speeches by Islamic extremists. Words fail me at this point, 'encourage' indeed; what a pathetic response to the free rein given to Islamic extremists at Great Britain's once world renown educational establishments.

It wouldn't be David Cameron unless there was some social engineering worthy of some of the worlds most notorious dictators.

Avoid social housing where people are from one ethnic group. Government enforced integration in other words. The freedom to choose where you live or who your neighbours are will be removed.

Reducing segregation in schools. Past experience has proved that government forced integration lowers standards of literacy, numeracy and the understanding of basic science.

And for a grand finale, the biggest social engineering wet dream of all budding dictators, build a more cohesive society. Social engineering on a national scale, what gives Cameron or the political class the right to do this remains a mystery.

That's basically it and it's going to take five years, after which we assume Islamic extremism will be gone from the land and we will all live in a safe, multi-cultural Utopia where everyone lives in peace with mutual respect for each other regardless of whether one is Arab or Jew, Sunni or Shi'ite, Turk or Greek, Indian or Pakistani, Hutsi or Tutsi, black or white.

Meanwhile in the real world where innocent people will die at the hands of extremists because of politicians like Cameron and their agenda:

The Muslims that are still being imported by the tens of thousands from backward countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Somalia and the Middle East are already radicalised and no five year plan is going to civilise them to the point where they will accept western culture or the western way of life.

An easy way to reduce the number of Muslim extremists immediately, not over five year period, is to stop importing them from the backward, undeveloped world; they are incompatible with British culture or our way of life. Ditto, the importation of child brides.

Those that are born in Great Britain, particularly in the thousands of Muslim ghettos that blight the land, are radicalised at home from birth by their own families. This radicalisation is compounded by their attendance at mosques and madrassas where the incendiary language contained in the Koran is repeated endlessly and learned by rote from an early age.

David Cameron and the political class, along with the UN/EU apologists of Islam, need to explain how this kind of explicit incitement to hatred and violence can be drummed into young children without them becoming radicalised?

The children in the above photograph are British, they are celebrating the Arba'een pilgrimage at the iconic London landmark, Marble Arch. These impressionable kids will also have witnessed Cameron's moderate Muslims publicly self flagellating themselves as part of their barbaric celebration.

(Watch the disgusting spectacle here)

These kids are the beheaders and Jihadi Johns of the future and it's no use Cameron claiming it was the Internet or social media. They are the product of his multi-cultural agenda, they are his creation and he will have the blood of innocents on his hands when they fulfill the commands of their prophet and kill innocent people because they are not Muslims.

Nowhere in Cameron's five year plan does he even mention the Koran or the Hadith and the exhortations within:

"I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers" - Quran 8:12

"Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous" - Quran 9:123

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians as your friends" - Quran 5:51

And so it goes on, page after page of hate, violence, conquest, mutilation and death. Doubters and apologists should read it for themselves. My copy is here which includes a parallel Arabic text.

The following are some of the tough actions David Cameron should be taking today if he was serious about fighting Muslim extremism:

Return free speech to political discourse; allow unfettered debate by removing political correctness from all areas of British life.

Stop all immigration from backward or so called 'conservative' Muslim countries, this includes brides of marriages whether they are arranged or otherwise.

No more mosque building and close those which preach anti-western propaganda.

Close all madrassas, these are schools for Muslim extremism and a breeding ground for jihadis, they are not compatible with western culture.

Arrest, imprison or deport all hate preachers and those that recruit for, or promote, jihad or ISIS.

No shariah law anywhere, the law of the land should be the only law - no exceptions.

Ban the Burqa, this garment is an insult to the struggles of the Suffragettes and the sacrifices women made to gain liberation and equality in Great Britain.

No more concessions to the sensitivities of this already pampered group. No imposing halal meat on the British people, whether that be in schools, restaurants or work canteens. Muslim employees must serve customers in stores with whatever is on the shelves, that includes bacon, other pork products and alcohol.

Those wishing to leave the country to join ISIS in the Middle East, or jihad anywhere else in the world, should be free to do so, never to return. Their passports should be cancelled and their citizenship revoked immediately on departure.

There is a choice for the political class when it comes to eliminating Muslim extremists from our midst and, by extension, making our lives safer; the sensible actions offered above or the long drawn out ineffective politically correct tinkering of David Cameron. The people also should choose and make their voices heard.

(More photographs from the London Arba'een spectacle here)