Murder and Mayhem Comes To Peaceful Multi-Cultural Sweden

Well that didn’t take long did it? The politicians have barely had time to put away their rehearsed responses to the Westminster terrorist attack in London before the religion of peace strikes again, this time in Stockholm, Sweden.

The long suffering public should prepare themselves for another rendition of the threadbare routine of phony outrage at this heinous act, phony sympathy for the victims and their families and a phony vow to leave no stone unturned to bring the perpetrators to justice.

As sure as night follows day politicians like British Prime Minister, Theresa May will then go on to absolve their most indulged client group with a lecture on the difference between Islamic and Islamist to prove that the murder and mayhem perpetrated in the name of Allah and his prophet is nothing to do with Islam.

At this point one is entitled to question the sincerity of these politicians and ask who exactly they are praying to when they claim that their thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families? Praying to the Christian God in public institutions is banned because its offensive to you-know-who and they have sanctioned the removal of the word Easter from Easter eggs and Christmas from the Christmas holiday.

The Muslim Mayor of London, Sadiqi Khan, was quick off the mark with the routine and utterly meaningless soundbites he used in the belief that if they are uttered by a Muslim it puts distance between the outrage and his coreligionists.

He begins with the routine and utterly meaningless soundbite “the capital stands united with Stockholm”, then follows it up with the usual nonsense about values. “Sweden has seen a despicable act of terrorism aimed at harming innocent people and attacking our shared values of democracy, freedom, justice and tolerance”. It sounds very good but how does it help the dead and wounded and how will it prevent the next attack? 

  

This is the same Sadiq Khan who states unapologetically that people should accept these terrorist attacks because they are “part and parcel of living in a big city”.

In a display of posturing typical of politicians, other world leaders will proclaim that they are standing shoulder to shoulder in solidarity with the Swedish people and order that public buildings are lit up with the colors of the Swedish flag.

Incidentally, it’s worth mentioning at this point that there was no such display of solidarity or thoughts and prayers for the victims of the recent terrorist attack in St. Petersburg which killed 14 and injured 45, so we can assume that innocent Russian lives don’t have the same value as their European or American counterparts.

Just as they do after every terrorist outrage an emotionally triggered public will set up a roadside shrine with flowers, balloons, teddy bears and shed rivers of tears at a candlelit vigil.

A pointless #hashtag campaign will surely follow with participants declaring that #IamSweden or some other such imbecility.

This incident will soon fade from the public consciousness as Kim and Kanye have another fight or some other surgically altered celebrity pops their clogs with a system full of pharmaceuticals.

It will fade from public consciousness until the next outrage when the same routine will be repeated all over again.

As heartless as it may seem it is difficult to have much sympathy with the Swedish people when they have allowed their political class to fundamentally transform Sweden into a so-called multi-cultural society using open border mass immigration from Muslim countries.

Radical imams are allowed to spout their murderous filth unmolested by the government with some Swedish politicians taking self-loathing and hatred of their own country to new levels of delusion.

Despite being the rape capital of the world, the Swedish government will continue to import testosterone fueled young jihadis from the war torn areas of the middle east, Africa and Central Asia.

Is it any wonder Sweden has a Muslim problem when one studies the behavior of the political class.

Imam in Sweden claims women who don't wear hijabs are asking to be raped here 

Sweden on the brink. Police at breaking point by migrant violence here.

Muslim gangs take control of 55 zones here.

Swedish politicians: Islam is compatible with democracy here

Islam in Sweden here

Under the leadership of the mentally unstable German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the supine leaders of the European Union will express their solidarity with Sweden then continue with their insane open border mass immigration policy regardless of the disintegration of their political project and the descent of the member states into violent civil disorder bordering on civil war.

There will be no respite from the war on the west that has been declared by adherents of Islam until the people themselves rise up and confront an agenda driven political class that are sacrificing the lives of their citizens on the altars of diversity and multi-culturalism.

In other news - the President of the United States of America has sent a message to any world leader that may harbor malign intentions toward his country and his people, not with words or soundbites but with a large dose of high explosive.

While the rest of the world are stuck with leaders who are dedicated disciples of the global elite and their borderless one world government, it would appear that President Trump is the only leader who is doing his sworn duty to put the safety and wellbeing of his citizens first and foremost.

                                                                           #MAGA 

London Bloodshed - Move Along Its Just Another Muslim Atrocity

Nobody should be shocked or surprised by the slaughter of innocents in Westminster, London yesterday since jihadi’s from the myriad of welfare financed Muslim ghettos have been threatening murder and mayhem since their mass immigration into Great Britain during the 1960’s and 70’s.

Their war against the west has been ongoing since the desert warlord, Mohammad, founded the death cult back in the early 7^th century as a perverted mockery of the Judeo-Christian faith.

The only surprise thus far is fact that the political class haven’t tried to censor the news or absolve Islam from blame for this atrocity. It’s only a matter of time before some spokesweasel for the political class dusts off the usual soundbites and declares that ‘this is nothing to do with Islam’ and the equally insulting ‘Islam is a great global religion of peace’.

Emerging from the safety of her bunker and surrounded by armed guards, Prime Minister Theresa May made a stage managed appearance outside No. 10 Downing Street and delivered a pre-prepared statement that was most likely written shortly after the last atrocity in readiness for this one. (See and read it here)

Apart from praise for the first responders it was a couple of minutes of meaningless drivel read from a sheet of paper and robotically delivered with the rehearsed faux gravitas we’ve come to expect from a machine politician. It contained the usual offering of condolences along with thoughts and prayers for the victims and their loved ones.

(It must be noted that calling for prayers goes against public policy since the act of praying is deemed to be offensive to a variety of progressive groups and banned from most public institutions.)

As expected Mrs. May made a pitch for multi-culturalism with a risible paragraph that is blatantly untrue and designed to create the image of the London as a Utopia of peaceful co-existence between diverse people.

Mrs. May intones that “The location of this attack was no accident. The terrorists chose to strike at the heart of our Capital City, where people of all nationalities, religions and cultures come together to celebrate the values of liberty, democracy and freedom of speech”.

The truth is that our Capital City is infested with mono-cultural ghettos and no-go areas where these different nationalities, religions and cultures do not celebrate any values other than the ones they have imported from the hell holes they left behind. They fiercely guard their own territories with intimidation and violence where turf wars are not uncommon.

Due to white flight into the suburbs and neighboring counties London is now a white minority city with a Muslim Mayor who indulges in the practices imported from his home country of Pakistan. The segregation of women at his public meetings is now the norm.

Mayor Sadiq Khan is an odious creature who doesn’t think that Londoners should be concerned by the murder and mayhem perpetrated by his co-religionists; he believes they should just accept it as ‘part and parcel of living in a big city’. He made these insensitive and offensive remarks in response to the 9/11 atrocity in New York.

As an apologist for Muslim violence Khan went on to say that “it’s a reality I’m afraid that London, New York and other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things”.

For the benefit of Mayor Khan and his supporters; Islamic terrorism is not part and parcel of living in big cities that happen to be devoid of large numbers of Islamists such as Tokyo, Seoul, and Hong Kong. (Khan's offensive idiocy here)

Prime Minister May’s assertion that different nationalities, religions and cultures come together in London 'to celebrate the values of liberty, democracy and freedom of speech' is deluded nonsense far removed reality.

Democracy has been so debased by electoral fraud, ballot rigging and bogus registration that it prompted one judge to compare Great Britain to a banana republic. The debasing of democracy on such a scale became routine after the borders were thrown open to mass third world immigration.

Ballot rigging, fraud and bogus registration is widely accepted as fact but Mrs. May, along with previous governments, refuse to take any action to stamp it out.

Along with all the other countries being governed by the European Union, censorship is the order of the day and freedom of speech is coming under attack from all angles especially with regard to speaking the truth about the religion of peace.

One has to wonder what backroom PR operative wrote the meaningless nonsense Mrs. May blathered on about in her statement. 

Exactly what does "the streets of Westminster being ingrained with the spirit of freedom" actually mean? And how on earth does ‘the values our Parliament represents – democracy, freedom, human rights, the rule of law – command the admiration and respect of free people everywhere’ help the bereaved and the injured come to terms with their plight?

The Parliament she refers to, especially the unelected House of Lords, is den of iniquity infested with villains, perverts, fornicators, expense cheats, common criminals and self-serving career politicians who put their own interests above those of the people they are meant to serve.

Celebrating the values of democracy indeed! This is the same Parliament that has surrendered the peoples’ sovereignty to a cabal of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and who are currently engaged in overturning the mandate from British people by sabotaging the exit from the European Union that was voted for in a democratic referendum.

The most offensive paragraph in this parable of nonsense was the one about Parliament meeting as normal and Londoners getting up out of bed and going about their daily lives as normal also. With all the seriousness she could muster Mrs. May tells us "they will board trains, leave their hotels and walk the streets. They will live their lives". Is she seriously expecting informed people to be taken in by this rubbish?

Unlike the people of London who have been disarmed and left defenseless against the people sworn to kill them, Mrs. May and the rest of the shysters that infest Parliament are protected by a comprehensive security apparatus which includes armed guards therefore the chances of them being killed or maimed by a radical Muslim are negligible.

What Mrs. May’s statement did not contain was any mention of Islam or any action to stop the carnage. The course toward a so-called multi-cutural society has been set and it will not be varied or reversed by Mrs. May or the political class. 

The importation of battle hardened troops from the middle east and African war zones will continue unabated; mosques and madrassas will remain open and continue indoctrinating the next generation with hatred for all non-Muslims and preachers of hate will continue to call for the rape, mutilation and murder of innocent British citizens in the name of Allah, as commanded by their prophet and as written in the Koran.

What is certain is that due to the inaction of the political class and their determination to impose multi-culturalism on the British people, the next victims of the Muslim jihad are already walking the streets completely unaware that they are going to be killed or maimed after which Mrs. May will deliver yet another meaningless statement containing nothing of value whatsoever.    

   

Orlando Jihad - It's Nothing To Do With Islam Part I - Its Gun Rights

Just when we think that the socialist/communist/liberal community, or 'progressives' as they like to call themselves, cannot sink any lower, they go and surpass themselves by using the deaths of forty-nine innocent Americans in Orlando, Florida to advance their political agenda.

The now infamous quote used by Obama bag-carrier, Rahm Emanual, 'never let a serious crisis go to waste' has been standard operating procedure for the unscrupulous left on both sides of the Atlantic but watching them double down by using this particular massacre has been an unedifying experience and an indication of how fanatical they are about their ideology and their determination to impose it.

The way that President Obama used his obsession with disarming law abiding American citizens in order to shield Muslim's and Islam from blame was shameless and without conscience. It was also a clear demonstration that the man is devoid of normal human emotions with no compassion whatsoever for the victims or their loved ones.

His 'progressive' agenda is foremost in his mind at all times and he will use every opportunity to impose it right to the very last day of his Presidency and possibly beyond.

Democratic Party candidate, Hilary Clinton, is from the same flawed gene pool as the President and equally emotionless. Using the slaughtered of Orlando to push her agenda is comparable with her looking the families of the Benghazi slaughtered in the eye and lying to them over the caskets of their loved ones.

In order to exonerate Clinton and the Obama administration from blame for the Benghazi slaughter, a media management strategy was initiated to blame some obscure video for inciting the violence that led to deaths of the four brave Americans.

National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, and a host of other loyal administration mouthpieces including Clinton, were dispatched to the bought-and-paid-for media whores to repeat the White House narrative that the video was to blame knowing that narrative to be false.

Likewise after the Orlando massacre, the same loyal mouthpieces, including Clinton, have been dispatched to the same compliant media whores to repeat the White House manufactured spin line about 'weapons of war' on the streets being the cause of the tragedy and not Islamic terrorism.

It should be noted that since this 'weapons of war' line of spin was being repeated simultaneously nationwide within hours of the tragedy it must have been co-ordinated in advance ready to be activated the moment another massacre occurred.

That would suggest that the conclusion of the political strategists after the San Bernadino massacre was that the administration missed an opportunity to use the tragedy to push for gun control. This would be corrected when the next massacre occurred which they knew would be perpetrated sooner or later.

And so it came to pass, President Obama, Hillary Clinton and their loyal mouthpieces used the compliant media to push the 'weapons of war' narrative, called for stricter guns laws and questioned the validity of Second Amendment itself.

This would also suggest that the administration expected another slaughter of innocent Americans by Muslim jihadis after San Bernadino but failed to take any steps to prevent it. Like the San Bernadino killers, the Orlando killer had appeared on the security agencies radar but no follow-up action was taken.

The reasons for this lack of action are many including political correctness and the conscious policy of showing leniency toward ethnic minorities regardless of their criminal behaviour. This would be the same leniency that is shown to illegal immigrant criminals across the country but especially in the so-called 'sanctuary cities'.

In this instance despite threats by ISIS to carry out attacks on the American people as they go about their daily business the effect of the administrations deliberate distraction was to push Islam and it's adherents out of the media spotlight and replace them with the ongoing mission to disarm law abiding citizens.

It's worth noting in conclusion that the mission to disarm law abiding American citizens is an article of faith held by President Obama and the so-called 'progressive' left; in fact by his own admission he would like the disarmament of citizens to be the center piece of his legacy.

Unfortunately for Barack Obama his actions in office will decide how history will judge him, and like Jimmy Carter before him he will not be writing his own legacy, that will be written by the people who were negatively affected by his actions as President and the victims of tragedies that could have been avoided had he been resolute in the face of Muslim aggression.

Michelle Malkin nails it every time. See here

To The Political Class The Orlando Carnage Is Collateral Damage

It is understandable that civilised people will be shocked by the death and destruction visited upon the innocent club goers in Orlando, Florida but they shouldn't be surprised, after all everyone knew it was coming.

The Muslim groups that carry out these bloody outrages have advertised their intention to attack innocent Americans both at home and abroad via their extensive and efficient social media propaganda operations.

The biggest questions facing the American people, and the entire civilised world for that matter, is why are the political class not listening and taking these threats seriously, and why are they not taking effective steps to eliminate this threat and protect the people of America and the wider world at large?

The choreographed media performances by the political class have become depressingly familiar as the atrocities against innocent Americans continue while promises to act are made at the time then quietly dropped when the news cycle moves on.

It seems like an age ago but it has only been three months since the political elite expressed their collective faux outrage at the Brussels massacre last March where thirty-two innocent victims were killed by Muslim jihadis and over three-hundred injured.

It's only been seven months since they expressed the same faux outrage at the San Bernadino massacre in December 2015 where fourteen innocent Americans were murdered and 17 injured.

It's been a year since the same political elite dusted off the soundbites in the wake of the Chattanooga massacre that took the lives of five innocent Americans and injured two in July 2015.

In November 2009, Muslim terrorist Nidal Hasan murdered thirteen innocent Americans and injured thirty-two at Fort Hood, Texas which the government insisted was an act of workplace violence.

In Europe it's only been seven months since Muslim jihadis murdered one hundred and thirty innocents and injured three hundred and sixty-eight in the Paris massacre.

Remember "Je Suis Charlie"? It's been eighteen months since the debilitating spectacle of world leaders taking part in a cynical phony photo opportunity after the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris.

Since these atrocities, and despite promises of action to keep the people safe, no effective action has been taken.

On the contrary, the fundamental transformation of America is continuing at an accelerated pace as President Obama reaches the end of his time in office and the threat of a non establishment President undoing and reversing the deliberate downgrading of America becomes a reality.

The borders remain open, legal and illegal immigration is continuing. The re-location of unvetted Muslims from the middle east is carrying on apace despite ISIS confirming that they will infiltrate their operatives into America posing as refugees.

The government is continuing to legitimize and give citizenship to people who have aroused the suspicion of the security agencies. Rigidly policed political correctness and fear of being labelled a racist serves to crush any dissent.

The Obama administration has been heavily infiltrated by Muslims including his Senior Advisor and Director of the Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs,Valerie Jarrett, an American documented Iranian who has openly voiced her intention to make America "a more Islamic country".
   

The global political elite have embarked upon a great crusade to re-order the post-war planet and nothing will deflect them from the course they have set. The new world they envisage is based on equality of nations, cultures and religions. This cannot be achieved with an advanced, prosperous Judeo-Christian America existing alongside backward, poorer nations.

America must be downgraded accordingly and the hegemony of Judeo-Christians in American life must be eradicated. This can be confirmed by the actions of the President aided and abetted by the political establishment along with the two other branches of government who have been co-opted into the project. Namely the United States Congress and the Supreme Court.

The promotion of Islam as great global religion of peace while simultaneously denigrating Christianity is a tangible part of the same project and will continue regardless of the ongoing massacres being perpetrated by Muslims both in America and across the world.

The news cycle will move on and the government will continue with it's fundamental transformation but the American people and those of the civilised world would be wise to remember that a billion or so Muslims across the planet have declared a holy war against the civilised world and against America in particular. The number of peaceful Muslims we hear so much about are so small in number by comparison they are insignificant and have no influence whatsoever on the majority.

The American people can expect more Orlando massacres, more San Bernadino's, Chattanooga's and Fort Hoods, the political class have embarked on great crusade to re-order the world and America's place in it. Nothing will stop them and the death of a few hundred more innocent Americans is considered a small price to pay.

See my response to the Brussels massacre here

Brussels Massacre - Remember "It's Nothing To Do With Islam"

As the civilized world looks helplessly on as yet another Muslim atrocity claims the lives of innocent people while going about their daily lives, the political class will go into their standard, well practiced charade of issuing platitudes of faux outrage then doing nothing to protect the people they have sworn to keep safe.

Political leaders will hurriedly arrange emergency sessions of their various security committees but the outcomes will be depressingly the same; they will dust off the usual soundbites and slogans, make promises to take drastic action they know they will not fulfill then do absolutely nothing to deal with the radical Muslims they invited into our midst.

It was the same charade after the Muslim atrocities in the Ottowa Parliament, the Lindt Cafe in Sydney, Australia, the Boston Marathon, Chattanooga, San Bernadino, the Madrid Train bombing, the 7/7 London Transport bombings, Charlie Hebdo, the Paris massacre etc.etc. ad nauseum.

There will be expressions of sympathy and solidarity with the Belgian people.

There will be condolences for the dead and their families.

There will be expressions of outrage at the barbarity of the killers.

There will be promises to leave no stone unturned to root out the perpetrators and bring them to justice.

There will be promises of firm action to prevent similar attacks in the future.

Then there will follow the biggest and most insulting soundbites of all, the inevitable "it's nothing to do with Islam" along with it's sister soundbite "we are not at war with Islam".

The fact that Islam has declared war on the civilized world will be studiously ignored.

The news cycle will then pass and nothing will have been done to stop the carnage and keep the people safe. The emergency committees will disperse, the slogans and soundbites will be put away only to re-emerge after the next atrocity and the one after that and the one after that too.

They will not take any practical steps to combat the murderous Islamists they have brought into our midst.

Mass immigration from backward Muslim countries will continue unabated.

Passports and other documents will continue to be issued to all and sundry without proper vetting.

Saudi/Qatari financed mosque building in western countries will also continue unabated.

Madrassas and religious schools in western countries will continue to indoctrinate children from an early age with the requirements of Muslims to conquer or kill infidels as demanded by their prophet Mohammad and as written in their holy book the Koran.

Imams and other preachers of hate will continue to spew their violent filth and recruit on behalf of ISIS openly and unmolested by the authorities.

Sharia law will continue to be accepted and in some instances will be incorporated into the law of the land.

Sharia controlled Muslim ghettos will continue to proliferate unmolested in western cities and will continue to act as breeding grounds and recruitment centres for global jihadis.

The press and social media will continue to suppress and censor the horrific crimes being committed by incoming Muslims, especially violent sexual offences against women and children, including   young boys.

Moves by the UN/EU to ban criticism of Islam and immigration in general will continue.

Deluded left-wing self loathers, anarchists, liberals and those that go around the place calling themselves 'progressives' will still be protesting and carrying their banal 'Welcome Refugees' signs.

George Clooney, Emma Thompson and the rest of the wealthy liberal elite will continue to press for the borders to be opened up to more middle eastern immigrants from the safety of their walled mansions and armed guards.

In conclusion, the list of pragmatic steps that the political elite could take to fight back against Muslim jihadis but refuse to do so is endless. Their commitment to impose Islam on western civilization is total, and the dead and injured of Brussels and elsewhere will be treated as acceptable collateral damage.

Encryption - The British Have Already Been Stripped Of Their Ancient Rights

As the debate about encryption and giving the FBI a backdoor key to access people's private information, the American people need to divert attention from their domestic issues and look at the demise of individual liberty across the pond in Great Britain.

The debate centres around the Constitution of the United States of America and the inalienable rights codified therein, particularly those of the first ten amendments, better known as the Bill of Rights.

The inspiration behind this document and it's foundation are it's ancient British counterparts, the Magna Carta dated 1215, the Petition of Rights of 1628, the Habeus Corpus Act of 1679 and the Bill of Rights from 1689.

Americans please note well. Without a written constitution to keep malignant politicians in check, these ancient freedoms and rights have gradually been eroded away in the name of security and the collective good.

Everyone in their right mind wants to see the terrorists defeated and the threat of terrorism removed from the land but can the FBI be trusted not to extend their brief to include perceived enemies of the state or those who disagree with the government?

The recent Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scandal is proof enough that Government departments have been politicized and are being used to harass and silence perceived enemies of the current administration.

This also applies to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). When headed by Janet Napolitano the list of potential enemies of the state included returning military veterans and so called 'right wing extremists'. There was no mention of 'left wing extremists' or communists who are now out of the closet and standing for President and Commander-in-Chief.

It's worth noting at this point that in Great Britain anyone who opposes open border mass immigration or who criticize multi-culturalism in any way is considered to be a 'right wing extremist' and given the epithet 'far-right' every time they are referred to or mentioned in the media.

It's also worth noting that talk radio host Michael Savage is banned from entering Great Britain because the government doesn't approve of his political views which are mild when compared to the Muslim preachers of hate who are allowed to spew their violent intentions with impunity.

Before deciding on giving access to the FBI to personal information the American people should be aware of the rights lost by the British people as the political class solidify their control over them and progress the fundamental transformation of a once free country to one resembling the former Soviet Union.

Rigidly policed political correctness and one-way hate crimes have curtailed freedom of speech under threat of prosecution. Quoting from Sir Winston Churchill's book The River War is reason for arrest.
(See here)

The right of British people to defend themselves has not only been infringed but removed completely; they are totally disarmed. Defending oneself or one's family in the home or at one's business can lead to arrest and prosecution if several strict criteria and caveats are not adhered to. Spur of the moment action, use of an implement or an adrenalin rush are not acceptable excuses for injuring and intruder.

Under a recently imposed rule change anyone lucky enough to hold a firearms permit will now be subject to visits by the police unannounced and without a warrant.

If this is an outrage then there are over 1,065 rules that allow some 20,000 various government agents and snoopers the right of entry into citizens homes without a warrant. Despite a promise Conservative government and their Liberal Democrat allies to reduce these to around 15, they have failed to deliver.
(See here)

It doesn't get worse than the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). This requires EU members to arrest and extradite their own citizens to other member countries, some of which do not have the legal systems or protections of the host countries. Victims have been left to languish in foreign jails for months or years before being brought to trial only to be found innocent.
(EAW injustices here)

Identical to the current FBI case in America the Communications Data Bill, better known as the Snoopers Charter, was introduced by Theresa May, the Conservative Home Secretary, to give the government access to citizen's private communications. This was rightly thrown out by Parliament but re-introduced as the Investigatory Powers Bill in the new Parliament where the government has an outright majority.

They can never take no for an answer; their malignancy and animosity toward their own citizens knows no bounds. They will never give up imposing their 'progressive' agenda on behalf of the UN/EU elites.

As a scam to strip the British people of their ancient rights it's pure genius by virtue of its simplicity:

1) Without consulting the people, the government opens the borders to hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants from the world's most backward, uncivilized places knowing full well they are totally incompatible with western civilization. They are also well aware that these same people will attempt to subjugate the host nation, using violence if necessary, as required by their prophet and as written in the Koran.

2) Make ludicrous claims that their presence is not only necessary for economic security but also culturally enriching.

4) When the the threats of violence become actual acts of violence and their commitment to jihad is fulfilled, the government strips away it's citizens ancient rights in the name of collective security and fighting the radical Islamists they invited into the country in the first place.

In conclusion, The Constitution of the United States of America is all that stands between the citizens and tyranny. I would strongly advise that the American people think long and hard about whether to make even the smallest concession to government agents because they have demonstrated in the past they are not trustworthy custodians of the inalienable rights and liberties contained therein    

Other so called inalienable rights and freedoms that have been slowly and quietly removed from the British people here.

Refusal To Eliminate ISIS - Politics In The Face Of The Enemy

One doesn't have to tax the memory too much to recall those heady days back in 1991 and 2003 when the leaders of the free world put the safety and security of their citizens and those of other threatened countries before agenda driven political expedience.

Names such as 'Operation Desert Storm' and 'Operation Iraqi Freedom', Colin Powell, 'Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf, Stealth Bombers, Smart Bombs and Precision Munitions became household names. Who can possibly forget the images as the American led coalition forces unleashed 'Shock and Awe' to defeat a ruthless and battle hardened enemy in record time with a minimum of casualties.

The Iraqi military machine prior to Desert Storm was the fifth largest in the world with over a million personnel armed with thousands of tanks and artillery pieces, a functioning air force, air defence systems, missile systems, including Scuds, all dug in and waiting for the assault. Also to be taken into account during Operation Iraqi Freedom was the possible use of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

As a reminder to the younger audience, Operation Desert Storm was over in forty-two days while Operation Iraqi Freedom was over in sixty days.

Today the world is being led to believe that a rag tag army of some thirty-thousand recruits, some no more than disaffected schoolkids, using captured equipment consisting of thirty or so outdated tanks and artillery pieces, some heavy machine guns and abandoned Humvees can hold the world to ransom while committing atrocities of the most barbaric and sickening kind.

It's obvious even to the most casual of observers that if the current crop of world leaders stopped the agenda driven politics and committed their military machines to a coalition charged with defeating ISIS, it would be over in weeks rather than months.

What should be a simple military campaign to eradicate ISIS is stymied by politicians not only playing geo-political games but also pandering to political correctness and their 'progressive' agendas at home.

NATO member Turkey is playing all sides against each other while reaping economic and political benefits. Any student of history will know that Turkey has a deep visceral hatred for the Kurds whom they have oppressed since Ottoman days.

The Turks and the Kurds are supposed to be allies against ISIS but the Kurds are refused any assistance or armaments from the USA and its supposed allies in order to keep the Turks onside.

In the meantime Turkey is acting as a staging post for ISIS volunteers as well as financing them via oil sales. Turkey is extorting two billion Euros per year from the European Union for refugee assistance along with visa free travel for all it's citizens and fast track membership of the EU federal state.

Russia is bombing ISIS along with Syrian rebels opposed to the Assad regime. The USA bombing campaign is a derisory, ineffective pin prick whereby seventy-five percent of missions return with unused ordinance due to fear of collateral damage or environmental concerns.

President Obama is more concerned with socially engineering the once mighty US military into a gender neutral, LGBT friendly home guard along with his stated objective of 'standing with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction'.

The French have sent an aircraft carrier to the area to drop a few bombs only in response to the Paris atrocity. Had there been no atrocity France would be continuing with it's efforts to undermine Israel on behalf of Hamas, Hezbollah, The Palestinian Authority and ISIS.

Although British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has been itching to have a war in Syria since the civil war began he has been prevented until now by the British Parliament. It's worth bearing in mind that Cameron's original excuse for going to war in Syria was regime change, not fighting ISIS.

Fear mongering about the non-existent ISIS threat from Syria, Cameron has finally got his war; unlike the French, he cannot send an aircraft carrier because he has decommissioned them as part of his evisceration of the British military in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force.

(At this moment in time the much vaunted Royal Navy does not have an operational aircraft carrier; the one it does have will not be aircraft capable until 2020 at the earliest, in any event it does not have enough sailors to man it or support ships to service it or the other two carriers it has commissioned).

For the record, the real ISIS threat to the British people is not from Syria but from home grown terrorists nurtured in the myriad of sharia controlled Muslim ghettos that Cameron refuses to dismantle along with the imported ready-made terrorists allowed in by his open border, mass immigration policy. Jihad John and the 7/7 bombers are cases in point.

At this juncture the personae dramatis are:

The Syrian government who are fighting the Syrian rebels and ISIS

The Kurds who are fighting ISIS and the Turks

The Turks who are fighting the Russians, the Syrian government forces, the Kurds and ISIS

The Russians who are bombing the Syrian rebels, ISIS and possibly the Turks in the near future

The French who are bombing ISIS

The British who are bombing ISIS and the Syrian government forces

The Americans who are dropping a few bombs on ISIS providing they don't kill any Muslims or harm the environment

The Jordanians who were bombing ISIS but have run out of ordinance

ISIS who are fighting everyone who will not submit to Islam

NATO who may be fighting the Russians if they attack Turkey in revenge for its downed bomber

Missing are the Saudi Arabians and the Qataris who are supposed to be allies of the USA, France and Great Britain but are financing and giving succour to ISIS while financing the spread of Wahhabism and mosque building throughout the western world.

Missing also is the UN and Ban Ki-moon where its business as usual passing resolutions against Israel, who it must be stated, would wipe out ISIS in a heartbeat if given a free hand to do so by the rest of the world.

How the informed world must long for those simpler days when military leaders were given a mission and left to accomplish it without political interference because as sure as night follows day, when the politicians get involved disaster follows.

Hollande: Revenge Without Mercy But Labels Netanyahu A Terrorist

Apart from the Israeli President, Benyamin Netanyahu, Russian President, Vladimir Putin and to some extent German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the current batch of world leaders are not only weak and indecisive but hypocritical in the extreme; it must also be noted that we the people must bear some of the responsibility for voting them into power.

While civilised people across the world mourn the victims of the Paris atrocity and express sympathy with their loved ones, one mustn't lose sight of the fact that this outrage was thoroughly predictable. It happened because the leaders of the so called 'free world' - especially the leaders of the European Union - put their fundamental transformation agenda before the safety and security of their respective citizens.

In pursuance of their United States of Europe and its new citizen, which is being created using imposed multi-cuturalism, these leaders have adopted anti-citizen positions, along with high moral stances, as they lecture and bully their respective populations into acquiescence.

In Europe there is no one more risible or hypocritical than French President Francois Hollande. A doctrinaire socialist, he adopts all the positions of the 'progressive' left including punitive taxes (seventy-five percent for the 'rich'), expanding welfare entitlements and dependency, EU integration, climate change, multi-culturalism, phony pacifism and most importantly the visceral hatred of Israel and the Jewish people.

Listening to the war-like language issuing forth from Hollande after the Paris massacre, one would be forgiven for confusing this Hollande with the one that regularly excoriates Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for defending his people against the daily onslaught of the murderous Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups.

Now that the Muslim jihad has arrived on the shores of France, it appears to be acceptable to promise a war of revenge, executed without mercy, upon inhuman barbarians regardless of the high possibility of collateral damage to innocent civilians.

One has to remember the reaction by Hollande and the rest of the world leaders - including President Obama and John Kerry - when Netanyahu defended his people against the four thousand rockets fired into Israel from Gaza which deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Taking out the rocket launching sites and the terrorists snatch squads who used tunnels to abduct and butcher innocent Israeli citizens was labelled 'disproportionate' and Netanyahu was harassed on a daily basis by Hollande and the rest to 'show restraint' while protecting his citizens.

After the Charlie Hebdo atrocity in Paris, Hollande invited the Palestinian Authority terrorist leader Mahmoud Habbas for the solidarity 'Je Suis Charlie' photo shoot but publicly displayed his contempt for Israel and the Jewish people by snubbing Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Along with the rest of the cowardly EU leadership, Hollande is at the forefront of the various campaigns to isolate Israel including the vile Boycott, Disinvest and Sanctions favoured by the ever-so-trendy celebrity community and their army of useful idiots.

While Israel is roundly condemned for building a security wall to protect itself against the same savages that attacked France, front line EU countries are erecting security barriers of razor wire to protect themselves against terrorist incursion during the phony 'refugee crisis' without comment.

Hypocrisy knows no bounds when terrorists bring their murder and mayhem onto home soil.

Since the leaders of the free world, including the USA and the EU, are standing by and supporting France as it executes its 'war of revenge, waged without mercy', upon the Muslim 'barbarians' of ISIS, it is now incumbent upon these same leaders to give equal support to Israel and its Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, who are the biggest victims of Islamic terrorism on the planet bar none.    

Cameron's Plan To Defeat Muslim Extremism - Tickle Them To Death

Apropos a previous article with reference to the shock and surprise displayed by people when a supposedly average neighbourhood kid, Mohammad Youssef Adbulazeez, turns out to be a cold blooded killer on behalf of Islam - it's worth expanding on the subject further in light of British Prime Minister David Cameron's five year plan to defeat Muslim extremism in Great Britain.

The speech whereby he laid out the plan is itself proof positive that Cameron is not only a remote elitist with no idea whatsoever of the real world outside his choreographed political existence, it also proves his mendacity and willingness to deceive. At the behest of his UN/EU spin doctors he delivered a speech so full of multi-cultural platitudes and fabrications he painted a totally false picture of Islam in today's Great Britain.

Apart from the truth, another thing his speech does not contain is any concrete measure that will effectively stop Muslim extremism and its accompanying violence from turning huge swathes of Great Britain into outposts of the Islamic State.

One cannot formulate a plan to defeat Muslim extremism without first understanding its nature, its core tenets and the conditions under which it flourishes and grows.

In his analysis, Cameron has replaced the reality of welfare dependent Muslim ghettos, run by tyrannical medieval Imams who use the Koran and sharia law to subjugate their congregations, with fictitious multi-cultural communities where historical enemies who slaughter each other in the real world live side by side in peaceful harmony.

For any informed person the use of the usual spin doctor authored soundbites and slogans to promote the UN/EU multi-cultural agenda is nauseating as well as an insult to the intelligence.

Cameron's plan has them in spades, "British values" as well as the infamous "shared values" then there's "shared community", and "one nation government".

"..a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy.......open, diverse and welcoming".

And what about this piece of unadulterated nonsense:

"It is here in Britain where success is achieved not in spite of our diversity but because of it".

Listening to this one has to wonder how the British people managed to survive before the Blair government opened the borders to third world mass immigration in 1997.

David Cameron mentions, but doesn't elucidate on, the "profound contribution Muslims from all backgrounds and denominations are making in every sphere of our society".

There are successful Muslims in Great Britain who do make a contribution after a fashion, it would be folly to suggest otherwise but "profound contributions" and "in every sphere of our society"?

A little exaggeration goes a long way when one is trying to deceive his own people and the world at large by painting an entirely false picture of one's most valued client group.

(Read the transcript here)

This five year plan to combat Muslim extremism comes days after Cameron praised Great Britain's Muslim community in his Eid Mubarak message where he mentioned the gathering of some sixty to seventy thousand adherents who attended an open air prayer meeting in Birmingham. How many of that sixty or seventy thousand adherents, or the rest of the four million British documented Muslims for that matter, are Jihadi Johns or typical British kids in the same way that Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez was an all American boy.

Ten percent? twenty percent? ninety percent? David Cameron doesn't have the faintest idea, not the remotest clue. Despite ample evidence to the contrary, he is making the claim that all British documented Muslims are moderate, peace loving, loyal British citizens until they are radicalised by external  malign forces either over the Internet or via social media.

The truth is somewhat different to this deliberately false picture and not too difficult to understand; combating extremism is not too difficult either and certainly with tough, effective action it wouldn't take five years.

Cameron's plan is so weak and bereft of tough action, I can only imagine that the Jihadi Johns and Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez's of this world will be laughing all the way to the battlefields of Syria or the disarmed military bases in the USA.

These people are savages lacking any form of compassion or emotion, they are highly motivated to kill in the name of Allah as demanded by their Prophet and as written in the Koran. Cameron's plan is the verbal equivalent of tickling them to death.

His tough action over five years includes:

Allowing parents to remove the passports of their spawn if they want to join ISIS. Cameron obviously believes that by keeping motivated young Muslims with a blood lust and hatred for western civilisation inside the country they despise, they will suddenly become de-radicalised.

Giving taxpayers money to groups that are prepared to spread an 'alternative narrative'. If there are any such groups in existence who value keeping their heads attached to their shoulders, they will take the money and surreptitiously hand it over to the nearest ISIS recruiting centre.

New powers to tackle cult leaders and those who spread extremist messages. Judging by the way that Cameron's government arrests and prosecutes anyone who publicly opposes Islamification these powers already exist.

Encourage Universities to denounce speeches by Islamic extremists. Words fail me at this point, 'encourage' indeed; what a pathetic response to the free rein given to Islamic extremists at Great Britain's once world renown educational establishments.

It wouldn't be David Cameron unless there was some social engineering worthy of some of the worlds most notorious dictators.

Avoid social housing where people are from one ethnic group. Government enforced integration in other words. The freedom to choose where you live or who your neighbours are will be removed.

Reducing segregation in schools. Past experience has proved that government forced integration lowers standards of literacy, numeracy and the understanding of basic science.

And for a grand finale, the biggest social engineering wet dream of all budding dictators, build a more cohesive society. Social engineering on a national scale, what gives Cameron or the political class the right to do this remains a mystery.

That's basically it and it's going to take five years, after which we assume Islamic extremism will be gone from the land and we will all live in a safe, multi-cultural Utopia where everyone lives in peace with mutual respect for each other regardless of whether one is Arab or Jew, Sunni or Shi'ite, Turk or Greek, Indian or Pakistani, Hutsi or Tutsi, black or white.

Meanwhile in the real world where innocent people will die at the hands of extremists because of politicians like Cameron and their agenda:

The Muslims that are still being imported by the tens of thousands from backward countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Somalia and the Middle East are already radicalised and no five year plan is going to civilise them to the point where they will accept western culture or the western way of life.

An easy way to reduce the number of Muslim extremists immediately, not over five year period, is to stop importing them from the backward, undeveloped world; they are incompatible with British culture or our way of life. Ditto, the importation of child brides.

Those that are born in Great Britain, particularly in the thousands of Muslim ghettos that blight the land, are radicalised at home from birth by their own families. This radicalisation is compounded by their attendance at mosques and madrassas where the incendiary language contained in the Koran is repeated endlessly and learned by rote from an early age.

David Cameron and the political class, along with the UN/EU apologists of Islam, need to explain how this kind of explicit incitement to hatred and violence can be drummed into young children without them becoming radicalised?

The children in the above photograph are British, they are celebrating the Arba'een pilgrimage at the iconic London landmark, Marble Arch. These impressionable kids will also have witnessed Cameron's moderate Muslims publicly self flagellating themselves as part of their barbaric celebration.

(Watch the disgusting spectacle here)

These kids are the beheaders and Jihadi Johns of the future and it's no use Cameron claiming it was the Internet or social media. They are the product of his multi-cultural agenda, they are his creation and he will have the blood of innocents on his hands when they fulfill the commands of their prophet and kill innocent people because they are not Muslims.

Nowhere in Cameron's five year plan does he even mention the Koran or the Hadith and the exhortations within:

"I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers" - Quran 8:12

"Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous" - Quran 9:123

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians as your friends" - Quran 5:51

And so it goes on, page after page of hate, violence, conquest, mutilation and death. Doubters and apologists should read it for themselves. My copy is here which includes a parallel Arabic text.

The following are some of the tough actions David Cameron should be taking today if he was serious about fighting Muslim extremism:

Return free speech to political discourse; allow unfettered debate by removing political correctness from all areas of British life.

Stop all immigration from backward or so called 'conservative' Muslim countries, this includes brides of marriages whether they are arranged or otherwise.

No more mosque building and close those which preach anti-western propaganda.

Close all madrassas, these are schools for Muslim extremism and a breeding ground for jihadis, they are not compatible with western culture.

Arrest, imprison or deport all hate preachers and those that recruit for, or promote, jihad or ISIS.

No shariah law anywhere, the law of the land should be the only law - no exceptions.

Ban the Burqa, this garment is an insult to the struggles of the Suffragettes and the sacrifices women made to gain liberation and equality in Great Britain.

No more concessions to the sensitivities of this already pampered group. No imposing halal meat on the British people, whether that be in schools, restaurants or work canteens. Muslim employees must serve customers in stores with whatever is on the shelves, that includes bacon, other pork products and alcohol.

Those wishing to leave the country to join ISIS in the Middle East, or jihad anywhere else in the world, should be free to do so, never to return. Their passports should be cancelled and their citizenship revoked immediately on departure.

There is a choice for the political class when it comes to eliminating Muslim extremists from our midst and, by extension, making our lives safer; the sensible actions offered above or the long drawn out ineffective politically correct tinkering of David Cameron. The people also should choose and make their voices heard.

(More photographs from the London Arba'een spectacle here)



 

Another All American Boy Turns Out To Be A Killer Muslim

Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez, a name that will live in infamy, not for any great length of time but for the duration of the twenty-four hour news cycle that dominates public information in the modern age.

Prior to murdering four unarmed Marines in Chattanooga, Tennessee, this subhuman will have been touted by the 'progressive' establishment as an example of the diversity and tolerance which made multi-cultural America such a great country.

(The fact is that the imposition and idolising of incompatible third world cultures is taking America in the opposite direction toward third world mediocrity, but I digress)

The follow-up narrative to this cowardly murder is depressingly familiar; he was such an honest/quiet/polite/decent/caring/devout/ordinary/witty......add your own adjectives... person that nobody would guess would kill four American heroes in the name of Allah the Merciful.

Neighbours in the Hixon suburb of Chattanooga described him as "an all American boy, handsome, polite, normally dressed in T-shirt and jeans". 

According to the agencies that are charged with keeping Americans safe after the 9/11 terrorist atrocities, he was not on their watch list even though his father had been investigated in the past for having links to Muslim terrorist organisations.

Looking at what evidence is in the public domain it doesn't take a Leroy Jethro Gibbs to conclude that in the interests of public safety political correctness should have been discarded and this family closely monitored from the time of the fathers' alleged involvement with terrorist groups.

The parents are Jordanians of Palestinian stock, a group of people many of whom are notorious for being bitter, twisted and consumed with hatred for everything Jewish, American and Western.

They were in Kuwait when their killer son was born before making their way to America. Why were they there and how did they get to America?

The killers' father was a devout Muslim who beat his wife and declared bankruptcy. Although he had the benefit of a good education, the killer never took advantage of the privilege by holding on to a well paying job, how then did he finance his trips to Jordan and possibly Yemen? What was he doing there for such long periods?

It's worth bearing in mind that there are fanatical Muslim American citizens continually planning atrocities in the name of Allah the Merciful and they are not going to advertise their intentions in advance. They will remain innocuous and keep their intentions under wraps until, to the undoubted shock and surprise of all and sundry, they perpetrate their heinous acts.

Judging by the attitude and actions of the Obama administration, and the various government agencies responsible for the 'fundamental transformation' of their country, the American people should not be taking their safety and well being for granted.

It has been highlighted as a matter of faith in these articles that the political class throughout the civilised world are totally committed to the 'fundamental transformation' agenda as ordained by the UN/EU de facto world government and as a consequence their agenda will always take priority over the safety and well being of the people.

One would have thought that the 9/11 atrocity would have been the last instance when American citizens were murdered by Muslim jihadis on American soil but this is not so. Since 9/11 there have been at least sixty-six people killed in forty-one separate acts of terrorism in America.

The more notorious of these have been the Fort Hood killer, despite the fact that this has been characterised as workplace violence, and the Boston Marathon bomber.

In addition to these atrocities there have been multiple mass murder plots against Americans by Muslim terrorists that have been thwarted by law enforcement and foreign intelligence operations since 9/11 as well as some that were botched. (See here)

The American people, and indeed those people around the world that used to rely on American power to free or protect them from murderous Islamic regimes, must be wondering why, when the local mosque in Chattanooga cancelled its post- Ramadan Eid Mubarak celebrations out of respect for the victims and their families, the President did not.

After making some perfunctory remarks on the tragedy he went ahead and hosted an Eid Mubarak celebration dinner in the White House, probably at taxpayer expense; he didn't even have the decency to lower the White House flags to half mast.

This behavior is sending a message to the American people that their sensitivities do not matter one jot compared to those of his most indulged client group, but more seriously than that, what message is it sending to the America hating Muslim terrorists both at home and abroad?

To keep abreast of Muslim atrocities visit thereligionofpeace.com

Islamic State - Cameron Loses The Plot Along With His Marbles

The British people are beginning to wonder what it is with their Prime Minister that compels him to cave in to every Muslim demand no matter how trivial or ridiculous. In the face of the ever growing hostility between the real British citizen and the imported anti-British Muslim community, David Cameron always comes down on the side of his most favoured client group.

To make matters worse he often chastises the real British people for their non acceptance of the alien way of life which all and sundry treat as incompatible with their own Judeo-Christian heritage. By insinuating that those who disagree with his own stance are bigots and Islamophobes, Cameron is using the same dirty tactics as the 'progressive' left such as demonisation and smear.

Cameron - along with his cronies and the like minded 'progressive' activists that are committed to imposing 'multi-culturalism' - must be the only one left in the country who is still pushing the "religion of peace" nonsense with reference to Islam.

Bearing in mind that Muslims comprise only four percent of the total population, one has to wonder whether Cameron has lost the plot, along with his sanity, with his latest order that the BBC "stop calling IS an Islamic State".

Regardless of the support among British Muslims for the Islamic State, he is concerned that they will 'recoil' at the phrase being used to justify the 'perversion of a great religion'.

In other words, on planet Cameron, Muslims will be offended by using the word 'Islamic' to describe the Islamic State which is called for by Mohammad and written in the Koran.

Incidentally, one would think that with all the taxpayer funded spin doctors that Cameron employs to stop him sounding like an idiot in public they would have explained to him that the abbreviation ISIL that he uses to describe the Islamic State means 'the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant'.

Cameron completely loses the plot when he explains that "saying ISIL is better than using Islamic State because it is in my view neither Islamic nor a state".

Roughly translated for those of us on planet earth who may be confused: Cameron is saying that the Muslim community will not 'recoil' or be offended if he uses an abbreviation for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in place of Islamic State because the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is different to the Islamic State which is neither Islamic nor a state. Got that? If not that's too bad because it only gets worse.

Without consulting the wider British public - they can now be ignored as the general election was over on May 7th -  the political class from all parties have jumped on the 'progressive' bandwagon by joining the Prime Minister in his call for the BBC to stop using the term 'Islamic State' to describe the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

To spare the relatively small Muslim community from offence and to prevent any further radicalisation of an already radicalised community, Honourable Members of Parliament are pushing the BBC, along with the government-media complex and the public at large, into using the term 'Daesh' in place of Islamic State, IS, ISIS or ISIL.

Daesh is a term based on an Arab acronym: al-Dawra al-Islamiya fil Iraq wa'al Sham which translates into...........Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (Syria).

Only in the remote, dysfunctional world of the political class is such insane behaviour treated as normal; not only has David Cameron lost the plot along with his marbles, so has the entire government, the establishment, the BBC and anyone else that lends them credence.

Due to this appalling behavior by the out-of-touch political class I will refer from now on to the blood drenched, barbaric state being set up by Muslims, many of them documented citizens of Great Britain, as the Islamic State regardless of any offence that may be taken.

Meanwhile in the real world - the one inhabited by real people who suffer the real consequences of imposed multi-culturalism  and enrichment- young white girls are still being groomed, gang raped and pimped out by David Cameron's most indulged client group who can do no wrong.

Mosques and madrassas are still being built despite local opposition, hate preachers remain on the streets extolling the virtues of the Islamic State and openly recruiting for ISIS. Volunteers, young and old, male and female, continue to make their way to Syria to fulfill the calling of Allah and Mohammad as written in the Koran.

It doesn't bother the politicians that Great Britain's capital city, once the epicenter of a proud nation, is now increasingly referred to as Londonistan; as a matter of fact they seem rather proud of it.

It would be interesting to hear what excuses the politicians have for the eighty percent of London's Muslims who support ISIS or the one tenth of all Londoners that view the Islamic State favourably.

Worryingly, support for ISIS is greatest among the under-25's. These are not as the political class would have us believe, young, impressionable youths who were radicalised by social media and the Internet, they are born and bred adherents to a cult that worships death like civilised people worship life.

All one has to do is read their holy book; far from being the religion of peace that the politicians claim it is, Muslims are taught from birth that every non-Muslim is inferior, an infidel that must be dominated or killed.

(Get your copy here for free)

In conclusion it is worth reiterating that Cameron along with the political class and the establishment are putting their cultural replacement agenda before the safety and well being of the British people with the result that there will be even more blood on their hands than there is now after the 7/7 bombings and the brutal killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby.

Don't miss A Snivelling Prime Minister by The Mellow Jihadi

British ISIS Killers Are Radicalised At Home From Birth

                                           "I don't want my daughters to grow up in England"

                                          "I don't like the UK, it's becoming more like America"

                                           "I don't want my children growing up in this society"

                                         I want to live in Saudi Arabia because I don't like the UK"

These statements are attributed to thirty three-year old Zorah Dawood who left our green and pleasant land to take up residence with ISIS in Syria along with her two children aged five and eight.

She was accompanied by her two sisters Khadija aged thirty and Sugra aged thirty-four along with their combined brood aged three to fifteen.
(Full story here)

These ISIS supporters join the hundreds if not thousands of other British documented Muslims who despise the British people and reject utterly the British way of life, making their way to Syria in order to fulfill their destiny and the requirements of their prophet.

The attitude of the government and the establishment, including the police and the BBC, is indicative of the yawning chasm that exists between them and the majority of the British people they are supposed to serve.

Time and again when news that more Muslim males, females or families have gone missing from their mono-cultural ghettos, the government along with the police and the BBC 'fear' for their safety or 'fear' that they are heading to Syria to join the caliphate.

In truth there is a mutual disdain bordering on hatred between these two incompatible cultures whereby the vast majority of the British people don't 'fear' their disappearance at all, instead they bid them good luck, bon voyage and good riddance.

It is now generally accepted that the government and the establishment are using the Muslim community as a battering ram to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on an unwilling people on behalf of their masters in the EU/UN.

This deliberate policy manifests itself in a Statute Book full of hate crime legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness that makes it virtually impossible to voice criticism, or any form of disagreement, for fear of prosecution.

In addition to this cordon of protection they have thrown around their client community the government and their agents continue to ignore reality by making excuses for the so called radicalisation of these ISIS volunteers.

When one looks in detail at the issue of British documented volunteers joining ISIS, it becomes obvious that the government is forced to make these excuses or else admit that the Muslim communities have not evolved away from the medieval desert death cult that is articulated in the Koran and are therefore incompatible with the British way of life.

The government claim that these jihadis were normal British citizens like any other then suddenly became blood thirsty savages by radicalising themselves using the Internet and social media.

The parents and families of these jihadis plead ignorance about radicalisation and have the temerity to blame the government and the police for not doing enough to prevent their offspring leaving to join ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

The excuses offered by David Cameron's former Cabinet member, Baroness Warsi, are risible beyond believe; it's no wonder she is regarded as an abject failure who was appointed on the basis of being a non-white Muslim woman (her words not mine) as opposed to merit.

Ignoring the fact that Great Britain's Muslim community is the most indulged in the land, Warsi has the gall to claim that the government has a deliberate policy of non-engagement with Muslims. She uses her standard accusation that any criticism of Islam is 'far right'.

Her nonsense was in response to a letter sent to mosques and Muslim organisations that rightly urged them to do more to root out terrorism following the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris.

It's worth noting for Warsi's benefit that forty nine percent of her 3.4 million strong Muslim community endorse hate preachers, twenty seven percent support the Charlie Hebdo massacre and eleven percent support jihad.

 Also, ignoring the antics of the notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary who, incidentally, is allowed to preach his filth and act as a recruiting agent for ISIS without fear of arrest, she claims that the government has 'failed to tackle Islamophobic language and hate crimes'.

(Watch Choudary harass a police officer over a Help for Heroes wristband here)

In reality, British Muslims are born and raised to be radical; not only is radical Islam in their genes it is reinforced every day of their lives by their culture and the religion they are subservient to and from which there is no escape.

The lady quoted at the start of this article along with her siblings are not immature, impressionable school kids, they are wives and mothers in their early and mid-thirties who have lived their lives in a free and open society.

The sad fact is that due to the requirements of the misogynistic cult they have been forced to follow they have not been allowed to participate in British life; instead they have been taught from birth that Great Britain is evil and must be subjugated or destroyed.

It is obvious from her second comment that Ms. Dawood has also been brought up to believe that America is the great Satan and Great Britain his willing apprentice. What kind of woman in the year 2015 would prefer to live in Saudi Arabia, or war torn Syria, as opposed to the United States of America or Great Britain?

The fact these women had taken their children, one only three years old, on a religious pilgrimage to Medina in Saudi Arabia, where non-Muslims are not allowed because they are regarded as infidels and therefore evil and unclean, confirms indoctrination of hate from childhood.

In conclusion it has to be said that these children, like all the other children who inhabit the thousands of mono-cultural, shariah controlled Muslim ghettos in Great Britain, are radicalised from birth and and it is unbecoming of the British government to claim otherwise.