Hollande: Revenge Without Mercy But Labels Netanyahu A Terrorist

Apart from the Israeli President, Benyamin Netanyahu, Russian President, Vladimir Putin and to some extent German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the current batch of world leaders are not only weak and indecisive but hypocritical in the extreme; it must also be noted that we the people must bear some of the responsibility for voting them into power.

While civilised people across the world mourn the victims of the Paris atrocity and express sympathy with their loved ones, one mustn't lose sight of the fact that this outrage was thoroughly predictable. It happened because the leaders of the so called 'free world' - especially the leaders of the European Union - put their fundamental transformation agenda before the safety and security of their respective citizens.

In pursuance of their United States of Europe and its new citizen, which is being created using imposed multi-cuturalism, these leaders have adopted anti-citizen positions, along with high moral stances, as they lecture and bully their respective populations into acquiescence.

In Europe there is no one more risible or hypocritical than French President Francois Hollande. A doctrinaire socialist, he adopts all the positions of the 'progressive' left including punitive taxes (seventy-five percent for the 'rich'), expanding welfare entitlements and dependency, EU integration, climate change, multi-culturalism, phony pacifism and most importantly the visceral hatred of Israel and the Jewish people.

Listening to the war-like language issuing forth from Hollande after the Paris massacre, one would be forgiven for confusing this Hollande with the one that regularly excoriates Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for defending his people against the daily onslaught of the murderous Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups.

Now that the Muslim jihad has arrived on the shores of France, it appears to be acceptable to promise a war of revenge, executed without mercy, upon inhuman barbarians regardless of the high possibility of collateral damage to innocent civilians.

One has to remember the reaction by Hollande and the rest of the world leaders - including President Obama and John Kerry - when Netanyahu defended his people against the four thousand rockets fired into Israel from Gaza which deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Taking out the rocket launching sites and the terrorists snatch squads who used tunnels to abduct and butcher innocent Israeli citizens was labelled 'disproportionate' and Netanyahu was harassed on a daily basis by Hollande and the rest to 'show restraint' while protecting his citizens.

After the Charlie Hebdo atrocity in Paris, Hollande invited the Palestinian Authority terrorist leader Mahmoud Habbas for the solidarity 'Je Suis Charlie' photo shoot but publicly displayed his contempt for Israel and the Jewish people by snubbing Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Along with the rest of the cowardly EU leadership, Hollande is at the forefront of the various campaigns to isolate Israel including the vile Boycott, Disinvest and Sanctions favoured by the ever-so-trendy celebrity community and their army of useful idiots.

While Israel is roundly condemned for building a security wall to protect itself against the same savages that attacked France, front line EU countries are erecting security barriers of razor wire to protect themselves against terrorist incursion during the phony 'refugee crisis' without comment.

Hypocrisy knows no bounds when terrorists bring their murder and mayhem onto home soil.

Since the leaders of the free world, including the USA and the EU, are standing by and supporting France as it executes its 'war of revenge, waged without mercy', upon the Muslim 'barbarians' of ISIS, it is now incumbent upon these same leaders to give equal support to Israel and its Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, who are the biggest victims of Islamic terrorism on the planet bar none.    

Netanyahu Joins The Long List Of 'Progressive' Hate Targets

Even to the most casual of observers it should be obvious by now that the ex-leader of the free world, President Barack Obama, has the emotional maturity of a spoiled brat who didn't get his own way in the candy store.

Undoubtedly, despite his best efforts, along with those of his political machine, the re-election of the impressive Binyamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel is a huge setback for his pro-Arab, pro-Iranian, anti-Israel agenda but this is no excuse for the display of petulance that is unbecoming of a President of the United States of America.

Anyone with any knowledge of the socialist/communist/self loathing community - these are the same people that go around calling themselves 'liberals' or 'progressives' - this reaction to an electoral setback is nothing new, in fact it is a perfectly normal response.

People who embrace the democratic process and engage in informed political debate tend to accept any election losses as part of the process as disappointing as they may be. This is because they tend to be intellectually more mature and accept that there are points of view contrary to their own.

Due to their firmly held belief that their world view is absolute and a historical inevitability these so called 'liberals' or 'progressives' are emotionally unable to accept defeat in any shape or form.

They are unable to accept that there are other world views and opinions contrary to their own hence their propensity for hatred toward anything they disagree with. They don't even possess the ability of agreeing to disagree, they must be right all the time.

'Progressives' don't just disagree with capitalism they hate it along with those who promote it. They don't just disagree with individual liberty they hate it along with those that promote it; they don't just disagree with Fox News they hate it and those that promote it; and so the hatred goes on with everything they disapprove of. This ranges from Wall Street to the fossil fuels, from CEO's to CO2.  
It's not just ordinary everyday hatred either, it's a visceral hatred that defies any rational explanation.

Surrounded by enemies that want his country and his people erased from the face of the earth has imbued Prime Minister Netanyahu with the tough qualities necessary to be a leader of his people and it goes without question that a love of country i.e. patriotism, is another prime requirement.

His media appearances warning the world about the danger that a nuclear armed Iran poses for Israel and the civilised world, together with their support for ISIS and the spread of radical Islam, are diametrically opposed to the appeasement policies being pursued by Obama and his besotted followers in the Islamified countries of Europe.

The Prime Minister's growing stature among the more civilised people on the planet, coupled with his tough stance in the face of murderous enemies, is showing up the rather flimsy leadership qualities of Obama, Cameron, Merkel, Hollande et.al. for what they really are; weak and cowardly springs to mind, not to mention embarrassing.

Patriotism, democracy, military strength along with the willingness to kill his country's enemies without quarter are an anathema to 'progressives' and along with their inherent and ideological anti-semitism it's little wonder that Prime Minister Netanyahu has attracted their hatred and that of their 'Progressive' in Chief.

I am sure he will take the hatred of his detractors in his stride and time will prove him right to stand up to the Ayatollahs and their murderous offspring who are without doubt a clear and present danger to the civilised world.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is in good company as the target of the lefts visceral hatred, he is joined in part by:

Free enterprise

Individual liberty

The Constitution of the United States (especially the First and Second Amendments)

Christianity

Prosperity

The Military

White middle class heterosexuals

The aspiring working class

The Fat Controller

Salt, sugar, pop...........................and so on and so forth

 

    

Echos Of Churchill - Ignore Netanyahu At Your Peril

Making comparisons between world leaders is controversial and fraught with danger due to the polarised political preferences of their supporters and detractors. Looking at recent events in the middle east the controversy around comparing Israeli Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, President Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron, can be all but removed.

He may not have reached the stature of Sir Winston Churchill but judging by his pragmatic approach to Iran and global Islamic terrorism he is head and shoulders above the current candidates for the leadership of the free world, the aforementioned Obama and Cameron.

The similarities between Netanyahu and Churchill became abundantly clear after his recent prophetic speech to the American Congress while his contrasts with Obama and Cameron became embarrassingly more stark.

Netanyahu warned the world about the danger of a nuclear armed Iran in the same way that Churchill warned the world about German re-armament prior to Word War II. Then as now, the appeasers and collaborators ridiculed the messenger which consequently condemned the world to a prolonged and destructive war resulting in some forty million dead, around half of them civilians.

He warned the world that the ruling despots of Iran are insane enough to use nuclear weapons to precipitate a war with the aim of erasing Israel and the Jews from the face of the earth and setting up a caliphate. This echos Churchill's warning that Hitler's true motive for re-armament was to start a war with the aim of setting up a Jew free, thousand year Reich in Europe.

The administrations in the White House and Downing Street have either learned nothing from history or they are appeasers in the mold of Neville Chamberlain.

These administrations are doing the same thing today with the Ayatollahs that Chamberlain did with Hitler and the Nazis. He came away with the Munich Agreement written on his infamous piece of paper that guaranteed "peace in our time".

The only thing it guaranteed was more time for Hitler to continue building up his forces and acquiring modern weapons before he annexed Austria, invaded the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia and Poland, exterminating their Jewish populations as he progressed eastward.

Prime Minister Netanyahu's impassioned warning not to trust the Ayatollahs fell on the deaf ears of the appeasers in the White House just as Churchill's warnings about Hitler and the Nazis were ignored by Chamberlain and the appeasers in Westminster.

Churchill's "sinews of peace" speech - perhaps better know as his "iron curtain speech" - delivered at the invitation of President Truman in Fulton, Missouri warned the world about the malign intentions of post war Russia to spread communism around the world.


The reaction to his speech wouldn't go amiss among the naive socialist/communist/progressive community of today. He was denounced as a warmonger and accused of insulting and denigrating a friend and ally. The great man was right, an iron curtain did indeed descend across Europe and fifty million people lost their lives as a result.

 Like Churchill before him, Natanyahu's pronouncements on the enemies of civilisation are dismissed as warmongering and an obstacle to peace in the middle east by the appeasers, the collaborators and the facilitators of Islamification around the world.  

In conclusion: Sir Winston Churchill was right in his day about Hitler and Stalin just as Netanyahu is right today about the Ayatollahs and radical Islam. If history repeats itself then millions of civilian casualties will be the legacy of the appeasers, the collaborators and the facilitators who refuse to learn the lessons of the past.

Obama Abdicates - Who Is The New Leader Of The Free World?

Those who follow global politics, especially those who paid particular attention to the American scene, warned during his original election campaign that candidate Barack Obama was an anti-western, anti-capitalist, anti-American 'progressive' who's core beliefs revolve around the philosophy of Karl Marx.

Everything he has done since his election to the American Presidency confirms that original prognosis as being one hundred percent correct.

His latest stance, protecting Islam from the justified uproar of criticism despite the daily diet of savagery carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah, as directed by their prophet Mohammad and as written in their holy book the Koran, should dispel any doubts once and for all.

For the global 'progressive' radical left he is the physical manifestation of all the things they hold dear; from socialist tax, spend, borrow and debt economic policies, the expansion of government entitlements and dependency, to replacing individual liberty with collectivism and state control, the President has obliged in spades.

Of more concern to those who cherish, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in a world infested with corrupt, ambitious, authoritarian despots who will stop at nothing to impose their perverted ideology or religion on the innocent, is the abdication of President Obama as the de facto leader of the free world.

The writing was on the wall when one of his first acts as President was to tour the world apologising for America's part in the history of global freedom. His hatred of America started to become apparent when he classified American exceptionalism, together with its willingness to sacrifice its sons for other peoples freedom, as arrogance.

Despite the tens of thousands of American war graves in France and elsewhere, the President apologised for America being derisive and dismissive toward Europe.

Since those early days when he nailed his anti-American colours firmly to the mast, he has set about his promised 'fundamental transformation' of that shining city on a hill with extraordinary gusto.

He has eviscerated the US military subjecting it to a social engineering program that has had a detrimental effect on its image and reputation. It should be understood that when correctly led and motivated it remains the most efficient military machine on the planet but it has lost respect among America's enemies and they no longer fear it.

The enemies of freedom, from Russia, China, North Korea, and most worryingly from Iran and the Muslim world, have learned by his lack of fortitude - combined with his belief that America is a global force for evil - that the Commander-in Chief will not use the military resources at his disposal to their full potential.

Consequently the real forces of evil in the world are emboldened; the Chinese military build up continues apace, Putin is expanding into Ukraine and threatening action in the Baltic states, North Korea and Iran continue to develop nuclear weapons without let or hindrance while other American interests around the world are encroached upon with impunity.

Of greatest concern is the rise of radical Islam and its utter contempt for America and the rest of the so called free world. While the Western leaders fret about their 'progressive' agenda of 'multi-culturalism, religious relativism, inequality, gay marriage, celebrity worship and all the fluff that occupies its people, Islam is on the march.

Its fifth columns of legally documented operatives are in place in Western societies and they are openly threatening to bring their jihad into the heart of America and Europe.

While the former leader of the free world spends his non-golfing time on illegal immigrant amnesty, criminalising legal gun owners and otherwise tearing up what is left of the peoples' Constitution, who will take over the unenviable task of leading the free world?

The nominations are few and far between with whole continents on the planet bereft of anyone with suitable leadership qualities. The entire African continent remains a land mass of aid dependent, blood drenched, warring tribes mired in corruption.

Ignoring the fact that that he led the communist inspired and financed African National Congress, the closest Africa came to having a respected leader was Nelson Mandela. There's Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe or long time President Museveni of Uganda but they are drenched in so much blood of their own citizens they are disqualified.

President Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya can be discounted on account he's suspected by the International Criminal Court of crimes against humanity. North Africa, including Tunisia, Algeria, Libya and Egypt have descended into chaos and fallen into the abyss of radical Islam.

Japan has disappeared off the face of the earth with near neighbours China and North Korea disqualified due to their authoritarian nature. South Korea and Taiwan appear to be lacking any recognisable or respected leaders.

President Putin of Russia is a strong leader who is currently running rings around President Obama and the Europeans on the geo-political stage but being an ex-KGB thug and tyrant disqualifies him also.

Canadian leader Stephen Harper doesn't set the world alight and although Australia's Tony Abbott started his Premiership with promise, unfortunately he is showing signs of buckling under pressure from the global elite with his acceptance of climate change/carbon emissions rhetoric.

That leaves Europe and the UN - and the nominations are:


David Cameron, Prime Minister of Great Britain

Tony Blair, Middle East Peace Envoy for the Quartet

Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany

Jean-Claude Junker, President of the European Union

Donald Tusk, another President of the European Union

Martin Schultz, yet another President of the European Union

Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations

This appears to be the best leadership talent available so may the Lord have mercy on us all....

There is one who stands out like a beacon in the depressing gloom of the modern political scene, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, who like the British during the Nazi onslaught in World War II, is standing alone while protecting his people from annihilation by a host of surrounding enemies.

Unlike the rest of the media creations that masquerade as statesmen and women, he has the qualities and experience to be the leader of the free world but due to the rabid anti-semitism that has risen from the ashes of history he would most surely be rejected.

The facts are plain for all to see, that apart from Benyamin Netanyahu there are no Winston Churchills, Dwight Eisenhowers, Ronald Reagans or Margaret Thatchers to stand up for freedom, liberty and democracy against the dictators, tyrants and evil doers of the world.

Until the people of the free world wake up from their media induced slumber and dump this current crop of self serving, agenda driven charlatans into the dustbin of history, evil will triumph over good, despair will replace hope and that shining city on a hill will become just another dust blown, run down, shanty town that is so familiar to the oppressed people of the world.  

Bombing Hamas And ISIS - Only Israel Must Show Restraint

The bombing of ISIS terrorists in Iraq and Syria must have come as a welcome relief for the much maligned Israeli government and the war weary civilian population of Israel as they emerge blinking from their bomb shelters.

As air forces from Great Britain, America and some Arab states rain down death and destruction on the latest bogey men from the Muslim world, one cannot help but be struck by the breathtaking hypocrisy of those politicians and Hamas supporters in the west who condemned Israel for taking similar action a few months ago.

Condemning Israel is putting it mildly; the first air strike in Gaza signaled the beginning of the usual tirade of abuse and mindless Jew hatred that accompanies any action by the Israeli government to protect its citizens from the medieval savages who have sworn an oath to kill every Jew on the planet.

Western governments, the anti-semitic elements that infest the 'progressive' community together with global organisations such as the United Nations and the European Union, joined forces to urge restraint from the Israelis or claim that their self defence actions have been disproportionate.

Urging restraint is all very well when one is living terror free in Washington DC, New York, London or Brussels but not so much when one is running with your children for dear life into a bomb shelter in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem.

What makes the hypocrisy worse is the fact that none of the countries currently bombing Iraq and Syria have been targeted, let alone hit, by a single rocket from Hamas or ISIS. Apart from the horrific murders of two American journalists and a British aid worker there have been no casualties in either Great Britain or America.

It is worth reminding ourselves that Hamas used stolen humanitarian aid money, and other resources that were intended for the Palestinian people, to stockpile rockets and other war materials in preparation for an unprovoked attack on Israeli civilians. They also built a series of tunnels for purposes of kidnapping children from Israeli kindergartens and other terrorist activities.

Hamas terrorists fired over four thousand five hundred rockets into Israel with the specific intention of committing mass murder and carnage of innocent civilians including women and children. It would be interesting to know what constitutes restraint under such circumstances.

In an unprecedented exercise to limit collateral damage to civilians, the Israeli Defence Forces dropped leaflets, sent texts and used all possible communication methods, including social media, to warn civilians to leave intended targets.

The British and American governments tempered their comments about Israel's right to defend itself with continual calls for restraint and for a ceasefire. The fact that Hamas broke every single ceasefire did not stop the pressure on Israel to be lenient and compassionate toward the people bent on its destruction.

It would be stating the obvious that in spite of the fact that there has not been a single rocket fired at Great Britain or America, let alone four and half thousand, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu will not be putting David Cameron or Barack Obama under constant pressure to show restraint in the same way that they and their acolytes pressured him.

Their justification for wreaking death and destruction in Iraq and Syria is that ISIS have threatened bloodshed and mayhem in Great Britain and America by operatives who are citizens of these respective countries. These proposed attacks on the British and American people is weak justification compared to the actual attacks on the Israeli people.

I cannot speak for the American people but their British cousins are entitled ask who is to blame for the thousands of radicalised Muslims who are either fighting the jihad in Iraq and Syria or who are acting as a fifth column ready to activate and kill British people in the name of Islam?

Driven by their fanatical determination to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on behalf of the global 'progressive' elite, it was the political class and their like minded cronies that allowed radical Islam to flourish in mono-cultural ghettos the length and breadth of the country.

Great Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron, by tolerating the existence of Muslim ghettos, promoting Islam as the 'religion of peace' and caving in to every Muslim demand is responsible for the creation of radical jihadis and must accept responsibility should they harm the British people.

Its ironic that David Cameron, and similarly Barack Obama, have created thousands of radicalised Muslim citizens of their respective countries and who continually laud their contribution to cultural richness and diversity then send hi-tech weapons of war half way around the planet to blow them all to smithereens.

In conclusion I will add that next time Hamas or Hezbollah or any other terrorist group attacks Israel, it would be incumbent upon those western leaders who have authorised and support the bombing of Muslim radicals in Iraq and Syria to refrain from pressuring the Israeli Prime Minister to show restraint while defending his people.

Footnote: I will add that I fully support any action, including bombing, that rids the world of the radical Islamists and jihadis that are causing death and destruction in all corners of the planet. Fight back, hunt them down, root them out and kill them all.

Update: This article was published before I got news of the barbaric murder of aid worker Alan Henning. My prayers are with his family and may he Rest In Peace.