Free Stuff Insanity - Why Migrants Cross Continents And Oceans

Everyone with a modicum of common sense will know that easy access to generous welfare benefits are the overriding reason why immigrants will risk life and limb on a perilous journey to clamber ashore a tiny, wet and windswept island in the north Atlantic

As well as passing through safe countries they will cross deserts, continents and oceans to get their grubby hands on benefits that the ordinary hardworking, tax paying British people are denied.

In order to stifle the truth, the open border and welcome refugees crowd, including the government, denounce anyone pointing this out as racist and xenophobic while accusing these truth tellers of hate speech/hate crimes leaving them open to prosecution.

The details of these benefits are not widely known so here is the inimitable Katy Hopkins giving a brief explanation and links to the offending document she's holding.


Asylum Seekers Creating Chaos In The UK - Katie Hopkins


Asylum Support - GOV.UK


What You'll Get - GOV.UK


How To Claim - GOV.UK

 

Libyan Exodus -The End Of Civilisation Is Not An Exaggeration

On the face of it the new Common European Asylum System recently imposed upon the peoples of Europe seems like a compassionate measure designed to make it easier for those fleeing persecution from war torn Libya to escape to Europe without the risk of drowning in the Mediterranean Sea.

Italy being the nearest landfall is bearing the brunt of the exodus and it is claimed that this measure is designed to spread the burden among all the member states.

The peoples of Europe should know by now that the unelected elite that run the European Union don't do compassion, or anything else for that matter, unless it progresses their decades long project to replace the nation states of Europe with a single federal state.

The crowning glory for these unelected bureaucrats was the Lisbon Treaty; this was the final instrument in a series of treaties that made the EU a legal entity. It now has all the attributes of an independent nation state, including a national anthem, a currency, a diplomatic service, an army, a legal system etc.

The only thing it lacks to make it complete as a distinct nation is a generic European citizen. This will be impossible to construct with twenty seven different national identities which have evolved and entrenched themselves over two millennia. As a consequence these national identities must first be destroyed before a European citizen can be created; one which will be loyal to the United States of Europe as opposed to the former individual nation states.  
 
The various cultures of the nation states are all based upon their Judeo-Christian heritage; this is being systematically destroyed and replaced by a mythical 'multi-cultural society' and it is upon this myth that the new European citizen will be based.

This is typical of the ideological nonsense with which the 'progressive' elite indulge themselves; we know from experience that in practice the 'multi-cultural society' consists of a series of semi-autonomous, mono-cultural ghettos, often financed by welfare entitlements and often rife with violent crime. It is nothing less than a modern form of apartheid where different ethnic groups maintain their individual native cultures and practices regardless of their compatibility with the host country.

In effect many immigrant communities have recreated their home country in Great Britain with a British passport and an entitlement to welfare benefits being the only things they have in common with the indigenous population.

This cultural replacement project was originally being achieved by dismantling border controls within the EU but as usual this was ill thought out and only succeeded in the transfer of peoples from the poor states of Europe to the more prosperous. In other words, all that was being achieved was nationality relocation as opposed to cultural replacement.

In order to speed up the cultural replacement agenda all borders were thrown open to all and sundry, including the third world, while any objections raised by the indigenous people were quashed with intimidation, smear and threats of prosecution.

After almost two decades of open border mass immigration the cultural replacement agenda in Great Britain has almost reached the tipping point whereby any action, no matter how draconian, will not halt or reverse the process.

Already the indigenous people with a Judeo-Christian heritage are a minority in many of Great Britain's major cities and some demographers predict that they will become a minority countrywide as early as 2030 and by 2050 at the very latest.

A recent report by the Henry Jackson Society has highlighted the fact that Muslims could decide the outcome of twenty five percent of all constituencies on account that their numbers are now larger than the margin of victory in the previous general election. In fifty one marginal constituencies Hindus could decide and fifteen where Buddhists could decide.

The Common European Asylum System surrenders what little control the British government had left  over its borders to the EU bureaucrats who have determined that the end of Great Britain's unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture is an absolute priority if a generic European citizen is to become a reality.

Anyone with an iota of intelligence will know that when the EU bureaucrats talk about spreading the burden of asylum seekers across the EU they don't mean the poorer countries such as Romania, Bulgaria, the Baltic states, Poland or the recently bankrupt countries such as Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal.

These countries are facing an outward migration of their own citizens as things currently stand. They mean Great Britain, Scandinavia and the more prosperous countries. They are also well aware that once legalised anywhere in the EU these migrants will make their way to Great Britain as their country of choice.

The British government and the political elite are fully on board with "ever closer union" toward a single European state and they are fully complying with the cultural replacement agenda. Ancient rights such as freedom of speech are being sacrificed in order to protect various ethnic groups and impose 'multi-culturalism' on the British people who didn't ask for it, weren't consulted and by all accounts don't want it.

The current Home Secretary, Theresa May intends to make any confrontation with the adherents of Islam a hate crime +1, while the Labour Party leader, Red Ed Miliband intends to make so called 'Islamophobia' illegal. 

In the meantime British documented Muslim terrorists, both male and female, are joining the blood soaked rampage through the Middle East with ISIS in ever increasing numbers and young under age white girls are being groomed and raped by Muslim paedophile gangs with little or no comment from either Ms May or Red Ed.

The standards of civilization which evolved over centuries are being eroded away by open border mass immigration and the governments refusal to ensure that incomers are compatible and willing to integrate into the British way of life.
  
On top of the already unsustainable numbers of migrants entering Great Britain every year, the current exodus of North Africans and Middle Eastern refugees into Europe provides an ideal opportunity for the EU bureaucrats to use faux compassion in order to dump tens of thousands more incompatible third world migrants into Great Britain. This will push cultural replacement passed the tipping point from which there will be no return and the end of civilization as we know it will follow.


  
 
                   

Welfare Financed Asylum Helps Create Great Britain's Jihadi Johns

To say that the British people are treated with contempt by their elected representatives would be another understatement joining thousands more in the catalogue of idiotic actions that beggar believe in a country awash with self serving politicians and an army of useful idiots.

When the notorious Muslim cold blooded killer known as Jihadi John, real name Mohammed Emwazi, first demonstrated his fondness for beheading innocent journalists and aid workers in the name of Allah, on the command of his prophet Mohammad and as written in his holy book, the Koran, the British people were unaware that he was one of their fellow citizens albeit a naturalised one.

They were also unaware that their government, and some of its agencies, had known about him and his chosen profession of murdering jihadi for some time.

If this wasn't bad enough, and to compound their horror, it has now been revealed that the family that spawned this evil sub-human were Kuwaiti asylum seekers who's patriarch was an Iraqi sympathiser after their brutal invasion of his homeland.

The British people will not be surprised however to learn that the Emwazi family of Jihadi John has spent the last twenty years on taxpayer funded welfare benefits estimated to be four hundred thousand pounds in housing benefit alone. ( That's $640k to our American cousins)

The Emwazi family, described by one landlord as 'parasites' and 'tenants from hell', are one of the millions of welfare colonists invited into Great Britain as part of the government's cultural and demographic replacement agenda.

The government and its establishment were fully aware that this family along with the millions of other welfare colonists would not be integrating into society or be making any contribution to the life or economy of Great Britain.

What is disconcerting about this particular family is that they supported the Iraqi enemy during the Gulf War in which British military personnel were sent to fight and where many lost their lives.

The treatment of this family is a classic example of the suspect loyalties of the British political class and it demonstrates once and for all the contempt with which they and their establishment hold for the very people they are paid to represent.

The Emwazi family were allowed into the country, supposedly in fear for their lives, after the first Gulf War despite the fact that they supported the enemy of the British military.

They were granted refugee status in 1996 and made British citizens in 2001.

With citizenship securely in the bag the fear of their homeland miraculously evaporated and they started travelling back to Kuwait while continuing to collect welfare benefits.

Jihadi John's father, Jasem, is now back working in Kuwait while his family continues to receive welfare benefits in London.

In any sane country where politicians respect and work on behalf of its people, they would have spotted the scam when the family returned to Kuwait immediately after being granted British citizenship.

If the politicians gave priority to the welfare of their people instead of their cultural replacement agenda they would have revoked the citizenship of the Emwazi family, stopped their welfare payments and forbid their re-entry back to Great Britain when they returned to their homeland the first time.

Consequently, Jihadi John would not have been radicalised by the plethora of hate preachers who infest the thousands of mosques and madrassas that are springing up in every village, town and city in Great Britain's once green and pleasant land.

Handing out British citizenship to young Muslim asylum seekers who are nothing other than potential Jihadi Johns is nothing new for self serving politicians who have their own agenda and who hold contempt for the views of its own people.

Most of the 21/7 London Transport bombing gang were young Muslim immigrants who were either granted asylum, leave to remain or citizenship regardless of their past criminal history or their potential for jihad and murder.

London Transport bomber Muktar Ibrahim is a classic example but not alone in being granted citizenship despite being a violent criminal thug who committed indecent assault at fifteen, who was involved in gang violence and sentenced to five years in prison for two armed robberies. After his release from prison he applied for naturalisation and was granted citizenship one year later.
(Cricketer v Muslim Bomber, a previous article on Muktar Ibrahim and the cultural replacement agenda here)

It's worth noting the weasel words of some Members of Parliament who claim to be "horrified" by these revelations but who have done nothing during their five years in office. It's also worth noting that these sudden howls of outrage coincide with a general election which is due this coming May.

In a display of deduction worthy of Sherlock Holmes Conservative MP David Davies thunders thus:

"This is an absolute outrage and a disgrace. We should stop their housing benefit immediately. Mr Emwazi clearly doesn't need asylum in this country".

His fellow Conservative Philip Hollobone states that "They are abusing our hospitality, the rules are quite clear. If there has been any abuse of the system here, money should be paid back."

Can the British people now assume that their enlightened MP's, Messrs Davies and Hollobone, will follow up on their outrage and ensure that they get their hard earned money back?

It's a mystery as to where Mr Hollobone has been storing his head for the past two decades but he believes that  "Mohammed Emzwazi's offences are worse than murder or terrorism. They are an assault on the British way of life".

The 'British way of life' as he puts it has been under continuous assault since the Blair/Brown Labour governments opened the borders to mass immigration in 1997 as part of their demographic and cultural replacement agenda.

An agenda it must be noted that Hollobone and his government have continued to implement with equal, if not more enthusiasm.

With immigration controls, including exit controls abandoned, and with their enthusiasm to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' undiminished, the production line of Jihadi John's is continuing unabated. The weasel words of MP's Davies and Hollobone are no substitute for action but the British people would be unwise to hold their breath waiting.

Manufactured Third World Immigration Crisis - Australia Fights Back

The fact that headlines and newsreels from various civilised countries are simultaneously full of images and comment about immigrants seeking refuge from persecution should be proof enough that the whole issue is being manufactured for political ends.

The disastrous consequences of mass immigration is at variance to what the relentless tide of spin and propaganda from the offending governments portray. The promised economic benefits turned out be nothing more than extra competition for scarce jobs with wages undercut and suppressed to the joy of unscrupulous employers.

The strain on taxpayer funded social services such as housing, education and health care has reached crisis proportions where, due to political correctness by agenda driven politicians and their compliant bureaucrats, immigrants often get priority over the local people.

The much vaunted cultural enrichment consists of female genital mutilation, spousal abuse, including murder in the name of honour, child brides, Muslim paedophile gangs, jihadi's, sharia law, gender selective abortion, halal meat, electoral corruption at the ballot box etc.etc.

Multiculturalism consists of everything associated with the host nation, including its flags, religious festivals, traditions and way of life being suppressed for the spurious reason that immigrants may be offended, while alien traditions, however repulsive, are accepted and promoted.

In reality multiculturalism consists of thousands of taxpayer financed mono-cultural, crime ridden, welfare addicted ghettos which are off limits to the indigenous people and in many cases to the police 'service' as well.

To the chagrin of the political establishment, the people are becoming immune to government spin and propaganda which is reduced to a series of puerile soundbites and slogans. Who hasn't heard and laughed at the nonsense the politicians want the people to take seriously?

Words and soundbites such as inclusion, cultural enrichment, shared values, celebrating diversity, community cohesion, cultural sensitivity etc. are a running joke. My particular favourite was uttered a Labour MP, who said that "our strength is our diversity" then claimed that sixty four million pounds was needed to promote 'community cohesion'. One needs a heart of stone not to laugh.

Regardless of the spin and propaganda to the contrary, it is now unarguable that open border mass immigration from the third world into developed countries has been an unmitigated disaster for the put upon people who were targeted by the global 'progressive' elite for cultural and demographic replacement.

At this point in time there is a manufactured immigration crisis in the USA, Great Britain and most other western countries as the global elite continue to downgrade and alter the cultural and demographic balances of the white developed world.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel however which is being illuminated by Tony Abbott on behalf of the Australian people who, it appears, is confronting the global elite head on. It is without doubt that despite its tougher than normal immigration rules, Australia has suffered greatly due mass third world immigration.

News that the Australian navy intercepted a boatload of Sri Lankan economic migrants posing as asylum seekers at sea, processed the occupants and then sent some back home via the Sri Lankan navy was met with applause from everyone except the usual crowd of self loathing bleeding hearts and the agenda driven global elite.

The case of these particular migrants highlights the false claims and outright lies that the aforementioned proponents indulge in to further their political ends.

The Sinhalese population are the majority in Sri Lanka therefore should have no reason to seek asylum elsewhere. If they do they are primarily Buddhist and could seek sanctuary in the Buddhist areas of India, Thailand, etc.

Since the ending of the civil war, Sri Lanka is no longer considered as dangerous as it was and it is now considered a destination for adventurous tourists. One has to ask why Sri Lankans are seeking asylum elsewhere when seventy percent of their compatriots, who fled their homeland to Canada, return there each year on holidays and vacations?

The Tamil population derive from, or are ethnically related to, the natives of Tamil Nadu in southern India. They are also mainly Hindu's so should assimilate easily into what is their ancestral home.

The Sri Lankan diaspora are located in nearby countries such as Malaysia and Singapore where they are highly regarded and hold senior positions in industry, business and political life.

When the facts are looked at in the cold light of day one has ask why a boatload of Sri Lankans would embark upon a perilous ocean journey to Australia from Tamil Nadu in India where they already have sanctuary with ethnic ancestors, to a country where they have nothing in common. If some reports are accurate they may even face a hostile reception as well as abuse and ostrication.

To get to Australia from Southern India or Sri Lanka they would have to bypass Malaysia and Singapore which have fairly large and mainly successful Sri Lankan populations.

For those supposed asylum seekers there is an eighteen mile long land bridge between Sri Lanka and India while the distance between Jaffna and Perth, Australia is some three thousand miles. If they take the northern route to Darwin its nine thousand miles while Singapore is some seventeen hundred miles and Kuala Lumpur is a mere sixteen hundred.

There can be no justification for migrants from Sri Lanka or from India to make a perilous sea voyage to Australia while bypassing more suitable countries in order to claim political asylum. The fact is they are economic migrants who are being encouraged in the same way that Guatemalans, Salvadoreans and Hondurans are being encouraged to enter the USA illegally for the purposes of cultural or demographic replacement.

The usual suspects are coming down hard on Tony Abbott and his administration for taking these sensible steps to counter what is yet another ploy by the global elite to force change that the people he represents wholly reject.

With the confession by one of the Labour Party's most senior figures, Peter, now Lord, Mandelson, that the Blair government sent emissaries around the world recruiting immigrants to come to Great Britain in order to facilitate cultural and demographic replacement, it should be more than obvious to every Australian and American that these 'crisis' are deliberately manufactured for political ends.

Tony Abbott is a hero for standing up the the global elite and deserves all the support he can get.