Bloodshed in Sydney, Peshawar, Boston Ad Nauseam - Don't Blame Islam??

The list of atrocities across the planet carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah, on the orders of his prophet, and as written in the Koran, are becoming more frequent and ever more appalling.

A day after the terrorist attack on the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Sydney came the shocking attack on a school in Peshawar, Pakistan where Muslim terrorists murdered one hundred and thirty two school children and thirteen adults. Not content with killing school kids, these animals burned a teacher to death in front of them.

These instances of pre-planned, cold blooded murder of innocent civilians going about their daily lives raises several important issues, with two in particular that should be of concern to everyone.

Firstly, with the short attention span of the public, combined with the control of the twenty-four hour worldwide news cycle by government media managers, these atrocities will be virtually forgotten within days, having been replaced by some engineered celebrity imbecility or major sporting event.

It is my guess that very few people will recall the incidents which took place only two months ago on October 22nd, and another one a day later*, which attracted saturation news coverage at the time. These incidents, which generated the usual pre-prepared slogans and soundbites that political leaders around the world keep in stock for such occasions, have now been virtually forgotten.

These slogans and soundbites are all the same format and are delivered by media trained Prime Ministers and Presidents with as much emotion as a campaign speech or new policy announcement. They consist of condolences for the families of the victims, buckets full of faux outrage and crocodile tears then finished off with with false promises to leave no stone unturned in order to bring the perpetrators to justice.

In the following days these same leaders and their acolytes will make choreographed appearances in the media with some tough sounding rhetoric assuring the people that they are on their side. This will be accompanied by some more vague promises which they know they will not carry out.

There will be no practical, effective actions to deal with Muslim terrorism at home or abroad for the simple reason that the global political elite are committed to imposing Islam on western civilisation as part of their post war agenda of re-ordering the planet.

Secondly, and more worrying, is the attempt by the politicians of western governments to distance Islam from these atrocities and absolve it from blame. This is despite the fact that the perpetrators and their worldwide supporters claim responsibility for their despicable acts and rejoice at every drop of infidel blood they spill.

If people around the world took the election of Tony Abbot in Australia as a sign that a common sense political leader from the real world had at last stepped onto the global stage, then his refusal to blame Islam for the killings in Sydney will come as a crushing disappointment.

Abbott has joined British Prime Minister David Cameron and the so called leader of the free world, Barack Obama, as protectors and appeasers of Islam because their 'fundamental transformation' agenda requires it.

The rhetoric they all employ when absolving Islam from these atrocities, together with the soundbites and slogans they use, could have been written by the same spin doctor. Bearing in mind they were all together in Australia for the recent G8 jamboree they most likely were.

Despite the tens of thousands of innocents murdered in the name of Islam across the planet from Indonesia to Nigeria every year, they continue to trot out "the great global religion of peace" nonsense at every opportunity.

The Fort Hood atrocity, where Muslim terrorist Nadal Hasan murdered thirteen Americans in the name of Islam, is being referred to as "workplace violence". Hasan has recently asked ISIS to make him a citizen.

The Obama administration has decreed that the global war on terror be referred to as an "overseas contingency operation" supposedly to appease offended jihadis.

The latest attempt to distance the global Islamic community ( the Ummah) from the Muslim atrocities is by claiming the perpetrators are "lone wolves" who are "self starting" terrorists who, without help, "self radicalise" via the Internet.

This deliberate deception conveniently absolves the thousands of mosques and madrassas, with their imams, tribal elders and hate preachers, from any blame for the radicalisation of their congregations.

It also absolves the politicians themselves for allowing millions of backward, and in many cases illiterate tribal orientated immigrants, into their respective countries to form welfare funded, violent, self governing ghettos where radicalisation is allowed to fester unhindered.

They knew these unfortunates would not be able to integrate or accept the modern way of life of the host country. In fact they encouraged them not to integrate and to keep their often barbaric cultural practices under the guise of diversity and cultural enrichment for indigenous people.

It is worth reminding ourselves of some of the atrocities, many now forgotten, and deciding if they were carried out by "self radicalised lone wolves" as the politicians would have us believe, or deliberate acts of terrorism, meticulously planned and financed by ruthless organisations who operate with impunity inside western countries as well as the fifty two Muslim countries on the planet.

The 1998 United States Embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya. 214 killed.

The 2002 Bali bombings in Indonesia. 202 killed.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings. 191 killed.

The 2005 bombings on the London Transport System. 53 killed.

The 2008 bombings in New Delhi, India. 3 killed.

The co-ordinated attacks on the business district of Mumbai. 166 killed.

The 2013 bombing of the Boston marathon. 3 killed.

The 2013 murder of British soldier Lee Rigby in a London street.

The Westgate shopping mall attack, Nairobi, Kenya. 67 killed.

*Finally the largely forgotten the October 2014 attack on the war memorial and Parliament building in Ottowa, Canada and the New York subway hatchet attack on four New York police officers.

In conclusion, the radical Muslims who are currently butchering their way across the Middle East in the name of Allah and his prophet are creations of the western political leaders, they are obviously not lone wolves, self starters, self radicalised or anything else.

They are the product of the multi-cultural agenda which is being imposed on western countries by an out of control political class who listen to no one but themselves. No amount of spin, soundbites or PR generated slogans are going to absolve them of the responsibility for the bloodletting abroad or at home when their creations make good their threats. 



 

Manufactured Third World Immigration Crisis - Australia Fights Back

The fact that headlines and newsreels from various civilised countries are simultaneously full of images and comment about immigrants seeking refuge from persecution should be proof enough that the whole issue is being manufactured for political ends.

The disastrous consequences of mass immigration is at variance to what the relentless tide of spin and propaganda from the offending governments portray. The promised economic benefits turned out be nothing more than extra competition for scarce jobs with wages undercut and suppressed to the joy of unscrupulous employers.

The strain on taxpayer funded social services such as housing, education and health care has reached crisis proportions where, due to political correctness by agenda driven politicians and their compliant bureaucrats, immigrants often get priority over the local people.

The much vaunted cultural enrichment consists of female genital mutilation, spousal abuse, including murder in the name of honour, child brides, Muslim paedophile gangs, jihadi's, sharia law, gender selective abortion, halal meat, electoral corruption at the ballot box etc.etc.

Multiculturalism consists of everything associated with the host nation, including its flags, religious festivals, traditions and way of life being suppressed for the spurious reason that immigrants may be offended, while alien traditions, however repulsive, are accepted and promoted.

In reality multiculturalism consists of thousands of taxpayer financed mono-cultural, crime ridden, welfare addicted ghettos which are off limits to the indigenous people and in many cases to the police 'service' as well.

To the chagrin of the political establishment, the people are becoming immune to government spin and propaganda which is reduced to a series of puerile soundbites and slogans. Who hasn't heard and laughed at the nonsense the politicians want the people to take seriously?

Words and soundbites such as inclusion, cultural enrichment, shared values, celebrating diversity, community cohesion, cultural sensitivity etc. are a running joke. My particular favourite was uttered a Labour MP, who said that "our strength is our diversity" then claimed that sixty four million pounds was needed to promote 'community cohesion'. One needs a heart of stone not to laugh.

Regardless of the spin and propaganda to the contrary, it is now unarguable that open border mass immigration from the third world into developed countries has been an unmitigated disaster for the put upon people who were targeted by the global 'progressive' elite for cultural and demographic replacement.

At this point in time there is a manufactured immigration crisis in the USA, Great Britain and most other western countries as the global elite continue to downgrade and alter the cultural and demographic balances of the white developed world.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel however which is being illuminated by Tony Abbott on behalf of the Australian people who, it appears, is confronting the global elite head on. It is without doubt that despite its tougher than normal immigration rules, Australia has suffered greatly due mass third world immigration.

News that the Australian navy intercepted a boatload of Sri Lankan economic migrants posing as asylum seekers at sea, processed the occupants and then sent some back home via the Sri Lankan navy was met with applause from everyone except the usual crowd of self loathing bleeding hearts and the agenda driven global elite.

The case of these particular migrants highlights the false claims and outright lies that the aforementioned proponents indulge in to further their political ends.

The Sinhalese population are the majority in Sri Lanka therefore should have no reason to seek asylum elsewhere. If they do they are primarily Buddhist and could seek sanctuary in the Buddhist areas of India, Thailand, etc.

Since the ending of the civil war, Sri Lanka is no longer considered as dangerous as it was and it is now considered a destination for adventurous tourists. One has to ask why Sri Lankans are seeking asylum elsewhere when seventy percent of their compatriots, who fled their homeland to Canada, return there each year on holidays and vacations?

The Tamil population derive from, or are ethnically related to, the natives of Tamil Nadu in southern India. They are also mainly Hindu's so should assimilate easily into what is their ancestral home.

The Sri Lankan diaspora are located in nearby countries such as Malaysia and Singapore where they are highly regarded and hold senior positions in industry, business and political life.

When the facts are looked at in the cold light of day one has ask why a boatload of Sri Lankans would embark upon a perilous ocean journey to Australia from Tamil Nadu in India where they already have sanctuary with ethnic ancestors, to a country where they have nothing in common. If some reports are accurate they may even face a hostile reception as well as abuse and ostrication.

To get to Australia from Southern India or Sri Lanka they would have to bypass Malaysia and Singapore which have fairly large and mainly successful Sri Lankan populations.

For those supposed asylum seekers there is an eighteen mile long land bridge between Sri Lanka and India while the distance between Jaffna and Perth, Australia is some three thousand miles. If they take the northern route to Darwin its nine thousand miles while Singapore is some seventeen hundred miles and Kuala Lumpur is a mere sixteen hundred.

There can be no justification for migrants from Sri Lanka or from India to make a perilous sea voyage to Australia while bypassing more suitable countries in order to claim political asylum. The fact is they are economic migrants who are being encouraged in the same way that Guatemalans, Salvadoreans and Hondurans are being encouraged to enter the USA illegally for the purposes of cultural or demographic replacement.

The usual suspects are coming down hard on Tony Abbott and his administration for taking these sensible steps to counter what is yet another ploy by the global elite to force change that the people he represents wholly reject.

With the confession by one of the Labour Party's most senior figures, Peter, now Lord, Mandelson, that the Blair government sent emissaries around the world recruiting immigrants to come to Great Britain in order to facilitate cultural and demographic replacement, it should be more than obvious to every Australian and American that these 'crisis' are deliberately manufactured for political ends.

Tony Abbott is a hero for standing up the the global elite and deserves all the support he can get.

Progressives Kicked Out Down Under - Australian People Refuse To Be Transformed

While freedom lovers around the world celebrate the humiliation of the 'progressive' vandals that have been rampaging through Australia, destroying all the good things that have been built up over the centuries, the rag tag alliance of millionaire socialists, hippies, peaceniks and green fascists are crying into their champagne/carrot juice at the halting of their transformation project.

Although Great Britain and America are the number one targets for the global 'progressive' agenda, Australia and Canada, having been created by evil white Europeans are not far behind.

According to the perverted minds of the global 'progressive' elite these four countries are largely to blame for all the ills of the world because the prosperity they engendered were the result of the two things they hate the most, i.e. capitalism and colonialism.

At this point it's worth a very brief recall of history and attitudes.

Due to the religious nature of their belief systems, the ability to understand the shear momentum of historical circumstances is beyond a 'progressive's' mental capabilities. They cannot understand that the unfortunate instances of cruelty that accompanied the European expansion into the Far East and the New World are miniscule compared to the outright savagery that preceded it.

If one listens to the emotionally charged, hippie-like interpretation of history, one would get the impression that Genghis Khan's blood soaked rampage across Asia didn't take place or the bloodletting of the early Chinese emperors, African chieftains, Arab slave traders, Moghul conquers ad infinitum, were figments of western imaginations.

According to modern 'progressives', the native tribes of the world would be all be living in peace and harmony like some medieval version of Woodstock, or 1960's flower power San Francisco, if it wasn't for the invasion of the white European. Their tiny, closed minds cannot accept the reality that many of these primitive people were permanently hungry, disease ridden, nomadic and at continuous war with each other.

The truth is that on the American continent Indian tribes butchered each other and took body parts as trophies; the same was the case with tribes the length and breadth of African continent. Perhaps the human sacrifices performed on innocents by the Aztecs and the Inca's in South America would be considered as quaint cultural oddities by these 'progressive' history deniers.

Australia and its people loom large in the cross hairs of the global 'progressives' and like their counterparts in Great Britain and America, the Australian people must be punished and fundamentally transformed for their historical 'crimes' of advancing civilization and bringing prosperity to an undeveloped continent.

Until the election of Tony Abbott a few days ago the fundamental transformation of Australia was continuing apace by the motley band of socialists, green fascists, and hippies, led by the Labor Party. The Australia of rugged individualism and free enterprise, contact sports and the Amber Nectar was being gradually replaced. Throw another shrimp on the barbie and have another tinny Cobber was to be replaced by halal meat, sharia law and no bikini's allowed on Bondi Beach.

Like Europe and America, forced multi-culturalism using mass immigration is the weapon of choice for the government and with it came the usual cultural enrichment associated with importing incompatible cultures. Middle Eastern men harassing women, violence when asylum seekers demands are not met, Muslim anti-freedom protests and the usual calls for beheading of those who supposedly insult the prophet.

Then there is the cultural enrichment offered by the Australian Sudanese community who are involved in violence with other African groups from Burundi, Congo, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Rwanda. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if these groups murder each other in their own countries, they are not suddenly going to get along peacefully because they have relocated to Australia.

Although the Australian people have spoken loud and clear that enough is enough, they or their new Prime Minister cannot expect an easy ride from the global 'progressives'.  They will not accept defeat graciously and go walkabout quietly into the outback. This is a bitter blow for them and their spin machines are already cranking up to nullify this superb result for freedom.

CNN, that loyal bastion of 'progressive' reporting from America is detracting from the victory of conservative policies over socialism by claiming that the electorate were 'jaded', disillusioned and disengaged by continual Labor party infighting.  In typical Obama-like fashion they are blaming anything including Rupert Murdoch.

They seem to be ignoring the fact that the Main Stream Media in their own country, including themselves, are an embarrassment with their continual groveling to their obviously inadequate 'Progressive in Chief'.

In Great Britain, the ultra left wing Guardian, better known as the printed version of the BBC, was unusually restrained in it's reporting of this historic victory but a read through the comments at the end of the item gives the reader a clue about the mentality of its readership. Hippie heads are exploding at the thought of normality being restored by the Australian people.

The BBC are not so restrained, as the mouthpiece for global as well as British 'progressivism' they cannot help themselves. Their man in Sydney, Jon Donnison, can barely hide his disappointment and spins this stunning victory with the party line, "Abbott's victory is not so much a ringing endorsement as a rejection of Labor".

According to our intrepid reporter in Sydney this victory has nothing to do with Labor's socialist policies ruining the economy as they did in Great Britain and the EU.

It had nothing to do with deficit spending and national debt.

It had nothing to do with the disastrous policy of forced multi-culturalism via mass immigration.

It had nothing to do with taxes and lower living standards put in place to finance the 'man made global warming' scam.

It had nothing to do with being continually lied to by unscrupulous politicians.

According to the BBC's man in Sydney, it's all about a disagreement between Kevin Rudd and the lying Welsh bint, Julia Gillard who swore before the world's media that "there will be no carbon tax under any administration that I lead", prior to introducing a carbon tax.

The world's 'progressives' and their media whores are not going to allow Tony Abbott or the Australian people to take their country back without a fight and it's worth concluding with what the American people have to endure as they come to terms with what is happening to them.

The Los Angeles Times have cranked up their smear machine to fight Tony Abbot even though these geographically challenged numbskulls couldn't find Australia if it was the only country marked on an atlas.

Among other things, they insult the new Prime Minister of Australia by calling him a 'gaffe prone right winger ,with a propensity for insensitivity and controversy'. This is a bit rich from a country that elected a pot smoking, Marxist community organizer as it's President, not once but twice. This is not to mention the gaffe prone, insensitive plagiarizer Joe Biden as their VP.

Los Angeles itself and California as a whole is renown for its political geniuses like the brain dead socialist and race baiter, Maxine Waters or the serial sex pest and pervert Bob Filner.

If the botox crippled Nancy Pelosi is the best America can offer then the LA Times really should take care who they seek to belittle.

The freedom loving people of the of world should take heart and emulate the bravery of our Australian brothers and sisters and have the courage to kick out the 'progressive' rabble who are intent on destroying western civilization.