Sanctimony And Hypocrisy From Europe After Florida Shooting

The shooting deaths of pupils at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida is another tragedy in a long list of tragedies that have befallen innocent Americans as they go about their daily lives.

After such a horrific incident it is right and proper that vigorous debate takes place to find the causes of the tragedy and to discuss possible solutions to prevent further tragedies in the future.

That is obviously too grown up for so-called ‘progressives’ and their fellow travelers on the left who didn’t waste a minute politicizing the incident to push their anti-gun agenda and those from the deep state who used the tragedy in their ongoing effort to tarnish President Trump and remove him from office.

What is truly absurd about this tragedy is the sanctimonious outpourings of some British people and their fellow hypocrites in Europe.

While some of these people are ordinary folks who expressed an emotionally triggered reaction, many are leftists who are using the tragedy to give voice to their inherent anti-Americanism while others are putting on display their Trump Derangement Syndrome they acquired through propaganda-induced groupthink.

While the sanctimonious fall over themselves to voice their opinions on tragic incidents in America they conveniently forget the mass killings on their own doorstep about which they remain silent.

An oft repeated sentiment is that children should be allowed to go to school without fear of being shot and killed; this is true but using the same logic people should be allowed to attend a concert or travel to work without being blown up in the concert hall or on the transport system or being mowed down as they walk on pedestrian walkways.

Awful and soul destroying as they are, the seventeen murdered teenagers in Florida pale into insignificance compared to the eighty-nine murdered teenagers at the 2015 Bataclan concert in Paris and the twenty-two murdered teenagers at the Manchester concert in 2017.

Fifty-two innocent people were killed in the 7/7 London Transport bombings in 2005, twenty-one people were killed in Brussels subway bombing in 2016 while on the same day fourteen were killed at the Brussels Airport.

Again using the same logic people should be allowed to celebrate national holidays and shop at a festive market without being killed and maimed by vehicles driven by terrorists.

Eighty-six people, including children, were killed when they were mown down by a vehicle while celebrating Bastille Day in Nice, France in 2016.

Eleven people were killed when they attended a Christmas market in Berlin, Germany in 2016.

Fourteen people were mown down and killed in the Westminster and London Bridge attacks.

Five people were mown down and killed in the Stockholm attacks.

Fourteen were mown down and killed in the Barcelona attacks and so it goes on the same as it does in America, innocent people in Great Britain and Europe are being killed while going about their daily lives.

The cry goes up that it's the availability of guns in America that is responsible for these mass killings and therefore they should be banned by the government.

Since all the killings mentioned above have been perpetrated by Muslims using vehicles, home made explosives and guns, why are the same people not calling for a ban on Muslims, vehicles and the ingredients for home made explosives? It must be borne in mind that AK-47 assault rifles are already banned but that doesn't seam to bother the terrorists.

The answer to the question is a mixture of the emotional need to indulge in public virtue signaling or political activism in the case of American tragedies and cowardice in the case of British and European ones.

It’s easy to shout from the rooftops that guns should be banned in America but only the courageous would risk shouting equally as loud for Muslims to banned from PC-controlled Great Britain and the European Union nation states.

The sanctimonious hypocrites in Great Britain and Europe are saying that thoughts and prayers are not enough, urgent action is required to prevent future tragedies when that is all they get from their own leaders after every Muslim atrocity accompanied by a #hashtag campaign, a light show and a patronising lecture about how it is nothing to do with Islam.

The British and European people need to educate themselves on why firearms are available to citizens in America. The Founding Fathers drafted the 2^nd Amendment to the Constitution to allow citizens to protect themselves and their families as well as protecting the Republic from external enemies from without and internal enemies from within. (See 2nd Amendment article here)

Maybe if the people of Great Britain and Europe had similar rights their leaders would not have surrendered national sovereignty to the EU autocrats their democracies would still be intact and their descent into third world shithole status avoided.

Welfare Financed Asylum Helps Create Great Britain's Jihadi Johns

To say that the British people are treated with contempt by their elected representatives would be another understatement joining thousands more in the catalogue of idiotic actions that beggar believe in a country awash with self serving politicians and an army of useful idiots.

When the notorious Muslim cold blooded killer known as Jihadi John, real name Mohammed Emwazi, first demonstrated his fondness for beheading innocent journalists and aid workers in the name of Allah, on the command of his prophet Mohammad and as written in his holy book, the Koran, the British people were unaware that he was one of their fellow citizens albeit a naturalised one.

They were also unaware that their government, and some of its agencies, had known about him and his chosen profession of murdering jihadi for some time.

If this wasn't bad enough, and to compound their horror, it has now been revealed that the family that spawned this evil sub-human were Kuwaiti asylum seekers who's patriarch was an Iraqi sympathiser after their brutal invasion of his homeland.

The British people will not be surprised however to learn that the Emwazi family of Jihadi John has spent the last twenty years on taxpayer funded welfare benefits estimated to be four hundred thousand pounds in housing benefit alone. ( That's $640k to our American cousins)

The Emwazi family, described by one landlord as 'parasites' and 'tenants from hell', are one of the millions of welfare colonists invited into Great Britain as part of the government's cultural and demographic replacement agenda.

The government and its establishment were fully aware that this family along with the millions of other welfare colonists would not be integrating into society or be making any contribution to the life or economy of Great Britain.

What is disconcerting about this particular family is that they supported the Iraqi enemy during the Gulf War in which British military personnel were sent to fight and where many lost their lives.

The treatment of this family is a classic example of the suspect loyalties of the British political class and it demonstrates once and for all the contempt with which they and their establishment hold for the very people they are paid to represent.

The Emwazi family were allowed into the country, supposedly in fear for their lives, after the first Gulf War despite the fact that they supported the enemy of the British military.

They were granted refugee status in 1996 and made British citizens in 2001.

With citizenship securely in the bag the fear of their homeland miraculously evaporated and they started travelling back to Kuwait while continuing to collect welfare benefits.

Jihadi John's father, Jasem, is now back working in Kuwait while his family continues to receive welfare benefits in London.

In any sane country where politicians respect and work on behalf of its people, they would have spotted the scam when the family returned to Kuwait immediately after being granted British citizenship.

If the politicians gave priority to the welfare of their people instead of their cultural replacement agenda they would have revoked the citizenship of the Emwazi family, stopped their welfare payments and forbid their re-entry back to Great Britain when they returned to their homeland the first time.

Consequently, Jihadi John would not have been radicalised by the plethora of hate preachers who infest the thousands of mosques and madrassas that are springing up in every village, town and city in Great Britain's once green and pleasant land.

Handing out British citizenship to young Muslim asylum seekers who are nothing other than potential Jihadi Johns is nothing new for self serving politicians who have their own agenda and who hold contempt for the views of its own people.

Most of the 21/7 London Transport bombing gang were young Muslim immigrants who were either granted asylum, leave to remain or citizenship regardless of their past criminal history or their potential for jihad and murder.

London Transport bomber Muktar Ibrahim is a classic example but not alone in being granted citizenship despite being a violent criminal thug who committed indecent assault at fifteen, who was involved in gang violence and sentenced to five years in prison for two armed robberies. After his release from prison he applied for naturalisation and was granted citizenship one year later.
(Cricketer v Muslim Bomber, a previous article on Muktar Ibrahim and the cultural replacement agenda here)

It's worth noting the weasel words of some Members of Parliament who claim to be "horrified" by these revelations but who have done nothing during their five years in office. It's also worth noting that these sudden howls of outrage coincide with a general election which is due this coming May.

In a display of deduction worthy of Sherlock Holmes Conservative MP David Davies thunders thus:

"This is an absolute outrage and a disgrace. We should stop their housing benefit immediately. Mr Emwazi clearly doesn't need asylum in this country".

His fellow Conservative Philip Hollobone states that "They are abusing our hospitality, the rules are quite clear. If there has been any abuse of the system here, money should be paid back."

Can the British people now assume that their enlightened MP's, Messrs Davies and Hollobone, will follow up on their outrage and ensure that they get their hard earned money back?

It's a mystery as to where Mr Hollobone has been storing his head for the past two decades but he believes that  "Mohammed Emzwazi's offences are worse than murder or terrorism. They are an assault on the British way of life".

The 'British way of life' as he puts it has been under continuous assault since the Blair/Brown Labour governments opened the borders to mass immigration in 1997 as part of their demographic and cultural replacement agenda.

An agenda it must be noted that Hollobone and his government have continued to implement with equal, if not more enthusiasm.

With immigration controls, including exit controls abandoned, and with their enthusiasm to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' undiminished, the production line of Jihadi John's is continuing unabated. The weasel words of MP's Davies and Hollobone are no substitute for action but the British people would be unwise to hold their breath waiting.

Cricketer v Muslim Bomber - British Values Absent From Government

As the repercussions from the Muslim Trojan Horse scandal rumbles on and the danger that these repercussions could have a negative effect on Prime Minister David Cameron's re-election prospects, he has resorted to what he does best, i.e. making promises he knows he won't keep.

Like the rest of the career politicians that make up the old political order, everything he says and does is concocted by spin doctors and media managers who's sole aim is gaining political advantage.

Whether a particular policy is right or wrong doesn't matter, how it plays in the media is the only consideration and this is with a view to winning votes.

For the uninitiated, the Muslim Trojan Horse scandal surfaced when school inspectors exposed a plan by Muslim activists to take over schools with intention of indoctrinating impressionable pupils with the joys of radical Islam and jihad. Some twenty eight schools had already been taken over with a significant number of pupils already brainwashed.
(Trojan horse scandals here and here)

It has been inferred that some school inspectors and government departments had an inclination that this was going on but true to form, as with the Muslim paedophile scandals, they turned a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity'.

The long suffering British people are rightly outraged that this kind behavior is going on in their once green and pleasant land, but their outrage will be to no avail. The political class, led by the Prime Minister, David Cameron, have committed themselves to implementing a cultural and demographic replacement agenda that has been long in the planning.

The people are crippled by the same political correctness that the British institutions use to implement this agenda. The key positions in all of these institutions are manned with Common Purpose trained technocrats who in turn command armies of like minded petty bureaucrats.

These cultural Marxists run everything from the civil service, to the BBC and the NHS - more damaging is the fact that they also run the police 'service' and the education department.

David Cameron and the political class are single minded that this agenda will be fully implemented and this will require that the traditional way of life, along with British values, be replaced with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

It can taken for granted therefore that when David Cameron appears before the bought-and-paid-for media with promises to act in defence of British values, he is merely repeating a carefully crafted response which is designed by his spin doctors to do three things:

a) sympathise with the peoples' outrage in order to pretend he shares their concerns. In other words 'he gets it'.

b) make promises that are constructed to appease the people's anger and close down the debate for rest of that particular the news cycle.

c) stem the hemorrhage of votes that these scandals generate.

This kind of shameless media manipulation is what passes for acceptable political discourse with this new generic political class, where the truth or the public good are to be avoided at all costs in order to progress the project and keep it on the rails.

David Cameron's promise to teach British values in British schools is impossible because, as mentioned previously, the entire British establishment, including the education department as been politicised and manned with like minded technocrats who are committed to the cultural replacement agenda.
(Cameron on British values here)

Examples abound of government departments ignoring British values in order to facilitate the said agenda and none more so than the different treatment meted out to a Zimbabwean cricketer and a Muslim bomber.

Duncan Fletcher was born in Salisbury, Rhodesia of parents who were born in England. It's worth noting that all four of his grandparents were also born in England. A gifted cricketer he went on become the manager of the English cricket team and guided them to their first Ashes victory over Australia in eighteen years. As a reward for his services to English cricket he was given the honour of OBE.

Again for the uninitiated, the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is an ancient order of chivalry bestowed by the Monarch for services to Great Britain.

                                                         

         

The one thing Duncan Fletcher was refused was British citizenship although he was entitled by the virtue of his parent and grandparents nationality. The Home Office claimed he hadn't met the residency requirements but ignored the fact that he was away touring with the English cricket team for six months a year.

In all Duncan Fletcher waited fifteen years before the British government were finally shamed into granting him citizenship in 2005.
(See here)

Muktar Said Ibrahim was born in Eritrea in 1978 and arrived in Great Britain aged twelve in 1990, supposedly as 'a child dependent on asylum seekers', whatever that means. He was granted residency in 1992'.

                                                                           

                                                                       

A violent criminal thug, he committed indecent assault when aged fifteen, he was involved in gang violence, and then two years later in 1996 he was sentenced to five years in prison for two armed robberies. He applied for naturalisation in 2003 and was granted a British passport in 2004. Despite his appalling criminal record, unlike Fletcher he had to wait all of one year.

Muktar Said Ibrahim rewarded the generosity of the British people by strapping on a bomb with the intention of killing and maiming innocent people while they commuted to work on the London Transport system on July 21st, 2005.

Along with his other gang members, all immigrants granted leave to remain or given British passports, he is currently serving a life sentence with a minimum set at forty years.
(See a brief biography here)

Although the news cycle has moved on, the people responsible for the different treatment of Duncan Fletcher and Muktar Ibrahim have not, in fact they have most likely increased in number and become more dedicated to their cultural replacement cause.

If the government had the interests and safety of the British people in mind, Muktar Ibrahim would have been deported after his release from prison the first time but, as the British people know to their costs, no immigrant gets deported anymore no matter how heinous their crime. The cultural replacement project takes priority over the people's safety every time.

If David Cameron is serious about restoring British values then it is imperative that instead of making promises, he clears the civil service, along with all the politicised government departments, of the indoctrinated Common Purpose trained technocrats that are instrumental in destroying those same British values and way life for their mythical multi-cultural society.

This a re-edited post from June.