Swedish Civil War – Catastrophe Engulfing Europe Due To Multi-Culturalism

Despite censorship and information control across the European Union news from the Geller Report that the National Police Chief of Sweden, Dan Eliasson, is pleading for help to deal with the outbreak of violent civil unrest comes as no surprise to Sweden watchers and journalists from the free media.

What does come as a surprise is its severity as illustrated by Mr. Elliasson when he warned that Swedish police forces can no longer uphold the law and pleaded with all good forces in the country to support them. It is even suggested that outside forces may be required such is the Swedish authorities inability to cope with the insurrection. 

The desperate situation is further emphasized by Johan Patrik Engellau, a research expert regarding destabilized countries who is quoted as saying “I’m afraid it is the end for the well-organized, decent and egalitarian Sweden we have known up to now. Personally, I would not be surprised if a form of civil war occurs. In some places, the civil war has probably already begun”. In other words Sweden is finished.

(Must read Geller Report here)

It’s difficult to imagine that an advanced European country with a centuries’ old sophisticated culture could descend into third world barbarity and civil war in a matter of decades.

What’s more difficult to comprehend is that the Swedish people did this to themselves with hardly a squeak of protest until now when it’s too late.

They must be the dumbest people on the earth when they believed their ‘progressive’ political class who ordained that their ancient Swedish culture and way of life was moribund and must be replaced with a so-called ‘multicultural society’.

It’s a wonder that the Swedish people didn’t string him up for treason when their former Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, claimed that Sweden’s borders are fictional and that Sweden belongs to the immigrants that come here – not the Swedes. (See his statement here)

One cannot ignore the role of the UN in this disaster since the destruction of Judeo-Christian civilization across Europe is an absolute necessity if their egalitarian, borderless one world project is to become a reality.

Evidence that the descent of Sweden into a poverty ridden third world hell-hole has been deliberately engineered by the Swedish government at the behest of the UN is incontrovertible.

According to the UN’s own projections Sweden will become a third world country by 2030 but they are doing nothing to halt the decline. In fact the opposite is true, they are actively encouraging it.

Obviously the global elite believe that a poverty stricken country riddled with disease and hunger on European continent is what the world needs at this point in time. (See the report here)

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is joined in her insanity by former Swedish Minister of Finance, Anders Borg, who said in 2013 that he hoped Sweden will look like Africa in ten years.

His epiphany for the Africanisation of Sweden came about during a visit to Lagos, Nigeria, where he noticed the beautiful colors of the African ladies dresses compared to the reserved and dull dresses of their Swedish equivalents.

He also explained that in ten years’ time it will look like Africa throughout Europe and that Europe will be better than it is now, and more multi-cultural.

(On a personal note; for my sins I spent some time in Nigeria during my expatriate career and I can assure readers that this is not a country one should aspire to emulate)

   

This poster child for 'progressive' lunacy takes self-hatred and delusion to the point where he must be certifiably insane and it’s a wonder he hasn’t been sent to the funny farm long before now. (Read this nutjob's lunacy here)

 

President Trump was ridiculed by the political class when he highlighted the fact that Muslim controlled no-go zones exist in cities across Europe, an existence which was roundly denied by the said political class and their various mainstream media propaganda machines.

A leaked report from Sweden concludes that the number of lawless areas in Sweden now totals 61. This is up from 55 in just one year. Lawless areas being a politically correct term for sharia controlled no-go zones.

Former British Prime Minister, David Cameron, never tired of repeating the dishonest and discredited mantra that Great Britain is the most successful multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-cultural country on the planet; a claim echoed by Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.

According to the UN Sweden is the best example of a peaceful multi-cultural society despite it being acknowledged as the rape capital of the world and in the midst of a civil war.

The truth is somewhat different in Great Britain and across Europe. Autonomous, welfare-financed Muslim ghettos are infesting all the major cities which serve as breeding grounds for radical Islamic terrorists on the home front as well as recruiting grounds for terrorist groups such as ISIS, Hezbollah and Al Shabaab for wars abroad.

As the people of Europe know to their cost, especially those in Great Britain, France and Belgium, it was terrorists from their Muslim ghettos that dealt out death and destruction to their innocent compatriots and supplied soldiers of Allah to fight in the Muslim wars across the Middle East, Africa and central Asia.

To make matters infinitely worse, and with a complete disregard for the safety of their citizens, the political class allow these battle hardened killers to use their legal documentation to return ‘home’ with their blood lust and devotion to Islam intact.

     

Not that the political class will ever admit it but the civil war in Sweden is a disaster which is unfolding across the rest of Europe and it is a direct result of their agenda to impose ‘multi-culturalism’ on people who didn’t ask for it, weren’t consulted and don’t want it.

Their response to this human and cultural catastrophe is to employ censorship to deny its happening and to harass and intimidate those individuals brave enough to expose the truth and voice any contrary opinions.

.

Read about mad Merkel’s censorship here

Read about Brits arrested for on-line comments while jihadis roam free here

This dictatorial behavior and appeasement of the violent Islamic terrorists in their midst will serve only to enrage the people further bringing civil war across Europe an ever closer reality; this in turn will make the Swedish civil war look mild by comparison.

Politicians Want Open Borders For Syrian Refugees - The People Do Not

Judging by recent news in the western media it would appear that the refugee crisis caused by the Syrian civil war is highlighting once again the yawning chasm that exists between the political class and the people they are supposed to represent.  It also represents the creeping ongoing attempt by the professional bureaucrats in the United Nations to take upon itself the role of a global government.

The reality of the Syrian tragedy gets lost in the dust kicked up by the political class as they jostle and elbow each other in their pathetic attempts to demonstrate their humanitarian credentials.

Syria's tragedy is just one of many going on around the world where people are forced to flee from their homes as a result of violence perpetrated either by insurgents of some kind or despotic governments repressing their own people.

The political class needs to explain why the Syria crisis has suddenly become the focus of their attention above violent episodes elsewhere in the world. They also need to answer a multitude of other questions before they do their usual trick of ignoring the will of the people and opening the borders to what we all know will be tens of thousands of economic migrants not refugees.

Bashar al Assad didn't become a blood thirsty despot overnight; he's always been one, as was his blood soaked father before him. The so called humanitarian political class tolerated their excesses for two generations as they tortured and murdered anyone who spoke up against their tyranny.

These so called humanitarians have tolerated the excesses of any number of despots and ignored the suffering of their people. In many cases the have supplied the materials, including arms and equipment that has enabled these despots to function.

It would appear that the world is divided into acceptable or unacceptable blood thirsty despots depending on their usefulness to the politicians of the day.

Bashar al Assad, a former dining companion of 'Hanoi' John Kerry, has obviously been moved from the acceptable to the unacceptable category.

To the horror of the hard pressed British people, the Labour party is calling on the government to open the borders to Syrian refugees ignoring the fact that refugees from war torn countries such as Sri Lanka and Afghanistan never returned home when their respective conflicts wound down but claimed asylum and stayed.

The British people have learned from bitter experience that when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, the political class and the bureaucrats unashamedly lie through their teeth and use the situation to burnish their humanitarian credentials and progress their cultural replacement agenda.

These much abused citizens have had their fill of diversity, cultural enrichment and 'shared values'.

They have also had their fill of ungrateful immigrants from Muslim countries taking advantage of their compassion and generosity, then joining the jihad or beheading a British soldier on streets of London in broad daylight.

The last thing the British people need is a battalion of battle hardened young Muslim men from Syria joining their co-religionists from Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, violently turning against their hosts or joining in their jihad against the west.

For the benefit of the politicians who may be reading this, the British people don't care about your humanitarian credentials, enough is enough.

The European Union bureaucrats in the Brussels Commission are calling on their member countries to open their borders and the UN bureaucrats in New York are calling on the United States to do the same.

In the case of the EU bureaucrats, they know full well, as do the long suffering people, that no Syrian refugee is going to want to go to countries such as Romania, Bulgaria or Croatia.

Furthermore, how can the impoverished people of Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal possibly support an influx of refugees when their bankrupt economies cannot support their own people.

The truth is that Great Britain and the United States will be the destination of any exodus from Syria and they won't be returning home when the war is over. Having experienced the largesse of these governments they will remain behind, particularly in Great Britain where they will be showered with welfare benefits care of the taxpayer.

The politicians and bureaucrats from the EU and the UN are highlighting the fact that Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis. They are failing to mention the fact that there are some fifty seven Muslim countries around the world, many of which are peaceful and awash with money that could easily absorb an influx of their co-religionists without any cultural or religious conflict.

The EU and the UN bureaucrats are calling on western countries who are only now emerging from an economic recession and not on rich Muslim countries to take Muslim refugees from what is essentially an internal Muslim conflict.

They are not calling on oil rich Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar or the fabulously wealthy United Arab Emirates. They are not calling on Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to name but a few. There is no need for western countries to open their borders to people who, when all things are said and done, despise the Anglo-Saxon, Judeao-Christian west and want it destroyed.

Beside their wealth and Muslim faith these Islamic countries also enjoy a much better climate than that cold, wet, windswept island in the north Atlantic. What could possibly be the attraction?

The fact that the Syrian crisis is not unique exposes the hypocrisy and double standards of the political class that the people now accept as normal political discourse.  Obviously some blood soaked despots are more acceptable than others.

Despots that have been transferred from the acceptable to the unacceptable category include Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic, Egypt's Hosni Murbarak and Pakistan's General Mursharaf.

Some despots have moved the other way from unacceptable to acceptable including, Wen Jiabao of  China and 'Mad Dog' Gadaffi went from unacceptable to acceptable and back to unacceptable in a matter of years.

Robert Mugabe, the butcher of Zimbabwe for some thirty years, remains in the acceptable category by virtue of the fact that he is still there murdering away in full view of the political class, the European Union and the United Nations.

As mentioned, the conflict in Syria is not unique, there are presently serious conflicts going on in Uganda, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Mali, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Yemen, Libya, the Philippines and Burma which have all resulted in population displacement.

These conflicts will not be solved by transferring their populations to the west. On the contrary it will only sow the seeds of future conflicts by forcing one culture to accept another with which it is totally incompatible.