Turkish Crocodile Devours EU Appeasers in A Classic Shakedown

It was Great Britain’s wartime leader, Winston Churchill, who noted that “An appeaser is one that feeds the crocodile, hoping it will eat him last”.

This quote is proving to be true by the appeasement yet again of Turkey’s radical Islamist President, Tayyip Erdogan, by the leaders of the European Union.

Apropos the recent news that Erdogan is shaking down the EU leaders again by threatening to open the borders and flood Europe with refugees and migrants, the predictable conclusion has been reached.

Reminiscent of Barack Obama's appeasement of the Ayatollahs', the cowardly EU leaders have caved in and agreed to pay the radical Islamic autocrat another five hundred and sixty-seven million dollars, (that’s $567,000,000), on top of the six billion+ dollars they handed over in 2016, for the same scam.  

When one considers that the U.N. is pouring money into Turkey, along with individual nations and any number of refugee agencies, the Turkish tyrant is making a killing by hosting refugees and migrants.

European taxpayers can rest assured that the Turkish tyrant will be back for more when this current half a billion runs out and he needs more military hardware or money to oppress an increasingly restless domestic population. 

If the EU leaders put the well-being of their people before their nation building agenda the solution is simple and cost effective. Also, it would save hard pressed EU and global taxpayers a king’s ransom (pun intended)

Following their own precedent, the U.N, in conjunction with the EU, should build an impenetrable buffer zone along the Greece/Turkey border replicating the demilitarized buffer zones they have previously built across Cyprus and the Korean peninsula.   

They have the expertise, the money and most importantly they have the support of most of the European people who have had to suffer the horrific consequences of continued mass immigration into their already blighted countries.

The buffer zone would be accompanied by a naval blockade of the Aegean sea lanes between Turkey and Greece to protect the vulnerable and already devastated Greek islands.

Unfortunately, the globalist leaders of the U.N. and the EU are not in the habit of listening to or acting on the wishes of the people.

The Danegeld being paid to Erdogan is a fig leaf to give the impression they are listening to the people and actually doing something.

In line with their belief in a multi-cultural, borderless world they will carry on with their cultural replacement agenda by encouraging mass immigration into Europe from the Middle East and Africa using alternative Mediterranean routes through Malta, Italy, Spain etc. regardless of the damage and misery it causes. 

As an example, Great Britain is not even in the the EU Schengen zone but despite years of promises by successive governments to reduce it, the latest figures show immigration is at the highest levels ever.  

As for the refugees and economic migrants already encamped in Turkey; a solution is equally simple:

Begin with dispelling the notion that Europe and the USA are the only possible destinations for refugees and migrants especially those from the Islamic faith who are incompatible with the Judeo-Christian culture and way of life of their hosts.

Instead of transporting tens of thousands of people across the entire breadth of Turkey, Europe and the Atlantic Ocean, they should be transported south through Jordan to their spiritual home in oil rich Saudi Arabia and onward if necessary to the equally rich Islamic countries of Kuwait, Oman and the United Arab Emirates.

Alternatively, they can travel east to their co-religionists in Iran or though Nakhichevan and the Armenian corridor to the Muslim majority countries of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and the other Muslim majority former Russian republics.

To conclude: Led by the fanatical German Europhile, Angela Merkel, EU leaders opened the borders and invited all and sundry to enter Europe with disastrous consequences for the people. This insanity led directly to Brexit and the rise of nationalist parties across the bloc.

Combined with the imminent collapse of the Eurozone economies, Brexit and the rise of nationalism has put the entire European nation building project in jeopardy and along with it the source of unlimited power for Chancellor Merkel and the EU leadership..

The Turkish tyrant, Tayyip Erdogan, has spotted this opportunity to blackmail the EU leaders by threatening to overwhelm the EU borders with hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants unless they pony up massive sums of money.

Unless the EU leaders take drastic action as suggested above, Churchill’s crocodile will keep returning time and again until there is no money left and they themselves are devoured.

“Appeasement. It’s a slippery slope” ……..”It means you want to work with the enemy. It means you’d rather join him than beat him”. – Patrick Ness.

Source material from the excellent Jihad Watch:

European Union to pay $567, 000,000 to Turkey to aid 'refugees'.       

Trump Hatred - Disrespecting The American People And Taking Them For Fools

The manufactured hysteria being whipped up around the world against President Trump under the pretext of a cruel immigration ban exposes not only the power of the global media machine but the determination of the global elite to prevent him from governing and putting a halt to their ‘fundamental transformation’ agenda.

It also exposes the lies, deceit and dirty tricks they employ, along with using embedded corrupt public
officials, including the judiciary, to prevent the President from fulfilling his campaign promise to keep the American people safe.

His Executive Order (EO) to put in place a temporary ban on immigration from seven America hating, terrorist infested countries which were highlighted by the intelligence agencies under the Obama administration has been variously described as an immigrant ban, a Muslim ban and the more emotion triggering ‘refugee ban’ which was designed to wind up the snowflakes and bring them onto the streets in protest.

To the mature, emotionally stable and informed members of the populace none of these are true, the EO is exactly what it says it is; a temporary ban on immigration from these hideous places until proper vetting procedures can be put in place that weeds out the terrorists and anyone else that despises America, does not share it’s values and hates its people and their way of life.

The campaign promise to deport illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes including drug smuggling, rape and murder is also being misrepresented in order to stir up emotions and hatred for President Trump.

The policy of deporting foreign criminals and illegal immigrants has long been Federal law which has not been enforced by previous agenda driven administrations. President Trump is doing the job he was elected to do by enforcing a law that already exists.

Like the rest of the propaganda campaign, the charge that he is intentionally targeting ‘law abiding’ illegals and deliberately splitting up families is designed to stir up the emotions of the feeble minded and foster hatred.

Incidentally, since there are no restrictions on anyone leaving the country to join a deported miscreant; no families are being deliberately torn asunder; it is a simple matter of priorities and personal choice for the families concerned.

The United States of America is no different to any other country on the planet by having immigration laws which include visa requirements, a naturalization process, rules on citizenship and most importantly penalties for illegal entry and visa overstaying along with criteria for deportation.

Judging by the chorus of opprobrium directed at the United States and President Trump from around the world it would appear that they, and only they, are inhumane for having the same laws as everyone else. America and President Trump must be the only country in world that are castigated and vilified for enforcing the law of the land. 

Mexico and its President attract no such opprobrium even though their immigration laws and
deportation procedures are stricter than those of its northern neighbor.

These laws include:

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society.

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country.

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned.

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported and/or imprisoned as felons.

Under Mexican law illegal immigration is a felony.

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law.

The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens from partaking in the country’s political life.

The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. (See here)

Although he has suggested no such thing President Trump has been vilified for the idea that anywhere between three and ten million illegal immigrants may be deported, however President Narendra Modi of India, a staunch ally and trading partner of the USA, suffers no such vilification for his country’s policy to deport some twenty million illegal immigrants back to Bangladesh.

These deportations are to prevent the Muslim immigrants out-breeding the locals and depriving them of their identity and, horror of horrors, to prevent terrorists infiltrating India among the immigrant flow.

As I know from personal experience strict conditions apply for any foreigner wanting to live and work in India and despite the fact that Indians have become citizens in countries around the world, Indian citizenship is only available to those of Indian origin. (See here and here)

In a similar vein Kenya is planning to deport four hundred and twenty-five thousand Somali ‘refugees’, without any global hysteria, because the invaders are ‘a breeding ground for terrorism and an economic burden’.

The global propaganda machine has ‘blacked out this news because it undermines the ‘Somali refugee’ narrative promoted in the west and because it’s a black state doing the expelling, instead of a European state’. (Read the article here).

Another example of immigration and deportation requirements that are stricter than those of the USA is NATO ally and prospective member of the European Union, Turkey.

They will deport foreigners who:

Use false information and fraudulent documents in procedures concerning entry into Turkey.

Who make a living through illegitimate means during their stay in Turkey.

Who exceed the duration of visa or visa exemption more than ten days, or who’s visa has been cancelled.

Who are identified as having been working without a work permit.
(See here)

One final example to illustrate the sheer hypocrisy of those that feign uproar at President Trump’s Executive Order is the case of the American born Muslim convert, Abdulakim Mujahid Mohammad. He is the perpetrator of the terrorist outrage in Little Rock, Arkansas in 2009 where one person was killed and another injured.

Mohammad traveled to Yemen in 2007 ostensibly to teach English but was deported for overstaying his visa and not having the correct government travel permits. He was also in possession of a fake Somali passport.

It’s more than ironic that an American citizen was jailed and deported from one of the proscribed countries for overstaying his visa and not having the required documentation. What’s even more ironic is that Mohammad had married a local Yemeni woman, therefore his deportation split up his family.

And so it goes on and on. Immigration and deportation procedures from allies, trading partners and enemies alike that are equal if not stricter than those of the USA but do not attract the vilification and hysteria from the global media or from foreign leaders who enforce the law of their own land but criticize President Trump for doing the same.

In conclusion: By continually vilifying and criticizing their choice of President and his commitment to enforce the law of the land like any other responsible President or Prime Minister, the American people are being disrespected and taken for mugs and fools.

America is well capable of surviving on its own, it doesn’t need the rest of the world so who could blame them if they pulled up the drawbridge, secured fortress America and gave us all the middle finger.

Canadian immigration article here

Immigration pitfalls in Indonesia here

  

Politicians Want Open Borders For Syrian Refugees - The People Do Not

Judging by recent news in the western media it would appear that the refugee crisis caused by the Syrian civil war is highlighting once again the yawning chasm that exists between the political class and the people they are supposed to represent.  It also represents the creeping ongoing attempt by the professional bureaucrats in the United Nations to take upon itself the role of a global government.

The reality of the Syrian tragedy gets lost in the dust kicked up by the political class as they jostle and elbow each other in their pathetic attempts to demonstrate their humanitarian credentials.

Syria's tragedy is just one of many going on around the world where people are forced to flee from their homes as a result of violence perpetrated either by insurgents of some kind or despotic governments repressing their own people.

The political class needs to explain why the Syria crisis has suddenly become the focus of their attention above violent episodes elsewhere in the world. They also need to answer a multitude of other questions before they do their usual trick of ignoring the will of the people and opening the borders to what we all know will be tens of thousands of economic migrants not refugees.

Bashar al Assad didn't become a blood thirsty despot overnight; he's always been one, as was his blood soaked father before him. The so called humanitarian political class tolerated their excesses for two generations as they tortured and murdered anyone who spoke up against their tyranny.

These so called humanitarians have tolerated the excesses of any number of despots and ignored the suffering of their people. In many cases the have supplied the materials, including arms and equipment that has enabled these despots to function.

It would appear that the world is divided into acceptable or unacceptable blood thirsty despots depending on their usefulness to the politicians of the day.

Bashar al Assad, a former dining companion of 'Hanoi' John Kerry, has obviously been moved from the acceptable to the unacceptable category.

To the horror of the hard pressed British people, the Labour party is calling on the government to open the borders to Syrian refugees ignoring the fact that refugees from war torn countries such as Sri Lanka and Afghanistan never returned home when their respective conflicts wound down but claimed asylum and stayed.

The British people have learned from bitter experience that when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, the political class and the bureaucrats unashamedly lie through their teeth and use the situation to burnish their humanitarian credentials and progress their cultural replacement agenda.

These much abused citizens have had their fill of diversity, cultural enrichment and 'shared values'.

They have also had their fill of ungrateful immigrants from Muslim countries taking advantage of their compassion and generosity, then joining the jihad or beheading a British soldier on streets of London in broad daylight.

The last thing the British people need is a battalion of battle hardened young Muslim men from Syria joining their co-religionists from Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, violently turning against their hosts or joining in their jihad against the west.

For the benefit of the politicians who may be reading this, the British people don't care about your humanitarian credentials, enough is enough.

The European Union bureaucrats in the Brussels Commission are calling on their member countries to open their borders and the UN bureaucrats in New York are calling on the United States to do the same.

In the case of the EU bureaucrats, they know full well, as do the long suffering people, that no Syrian refugee is going to want to go to countries such as Romania, Bulgaria or Croatia.

Furthermore, how can the impoverished people of Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal possibly support an influx of refugees when their bankrupt economies cannot support their own people.

The truth is that Great Britain and the United States will be the destination of any exodus from Syria and they won't be returning home when the war is over. Having experienced the largesse of these governments they will remain behind, particularly in Great Britain where they will be showered with welfare benefits care of the taxpayer.

The politicians and bureaucrats from the EU and the UN are highlighting the fact that Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis. They are failing to mention the fact that there are some fifty seven Muslim countries around the world, many of which are peaceful and awash with money that could easily absorb an influx of their co-religionists without any cultural or religious conflict.

The EU and the UN bureaucrats are calling on western countries who are only now emerging from an economic recession and not on rich Muslim countries to take Muslim refugees from what is essentially an internal Muslim conflict.

They are not calling on oil rich Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar or the fabulously wealthy United Arab Emirates. They are not calling on Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to name but a few. There is no need for western countries to open their borders to people who, when all things are said and done, despise the Anglo-Saxon, Judeao-Christian west and want it destroyed.

Beside their wealth and Muslim faith these Islamic countries also enjoy a much better climate than that cold, wet, windswept island in the north Atlantic. What could possibly be the attraction?

The fact that the Syrian crisis is not unique exposes the hypocrisy and double standards of the political class that the people now accept as normal political discourse.  Obviously some blood soaked despots are more acceptable than others.

Despots that have been transferred from the acceptable to the unacceptable category include Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic, Egypt's Hosni Murbarak and Pakistan's General Mursharaf.

Some despots have moved the other way from unacceptable to acceptable including, Wen Jiabao of  China and 'Mad Dog' Gadaffi went from unacceptable to acceptable and back to unacceptable in a matter of years.

Robert Mugabe, the butcher of Zimbabwe for some thirty years, remains in the acceptable category by virtue of the fact that he is still there murdering away in full view of the political class, the European Union and the United Nations.

As mentioned, the conflict in Syria is not unique, there are presently serious conflicts going on in Uganda, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Mali, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Yemen, Libya, the Philippines and Burma which have all resulted in population displacement.

These conflicts will not be solved by transferring their populations to the west. On the contrary it will only sow the seeds of future conflicts by forcing one culture to accept another with which it is totally incompatible.