Conflicts around the world be they minor skirmishes of a local nature or larger in scale with loss of life or displacement of civilians, usually follow a familiar pattern. The current conflict in the Ukraine is no different and it is a classic example for students of current affairs and political behavior to study for their thesis or dissertations.
First there's the televised faux outrage by Heads of State or their mouthpieces, followed by some sabre rattling and threats of economic sanctions.
This period is usually followed by some ineffectual posturing at the United Nations and in the unlikely event that all parties can agree, maybe a resolution is issued condemning the bogyman of the day.
(This is dependent upon the UN bureaucrats taking time out from their full time occupation of passing resolutions condemning the USA or Israel)
Then as sure as night follows day comes the call for taxpayers money. Not just a little bit for emergency aid such as tents, blankets, bottled water or medical supplies, but shed loads of it, supposedly to help with reconstruction.
In the case of the Ukraine reconstruction of what is not immediately clear as the Ukrainian infrastructure is as modern as in most other countries in Europe, including and Russia, and the country has an acknowledged modern industrial base.
At the head of the queue with a taxpayer funded give away was the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne who, without consulting the people, generously offered Ukraine a blank cheque.
That was indeed very generous of him considering that infrastructure in Great Britain is badly in need of attention itself. As a result of a deliberate and unprecedented increase in the population, there is now a desperate shortage of houses, hospitals and schools.
Infrastructure such as sewers, water, electricity and gas supply lines, are in need of replacing along with roads, railways and airports that are in need of upgrading and expansion.
If the official statistics are to be believed, poverty in Great Britain has reached Dickensian levels of desperation with the use of food banks and homelessness at an all time high. Increasing numbers of people are finding themselves in fuel poverty with an extra thirty thousand deaths expected this winter due to hypothermia.
These 'excess deaths' as they are officially known are obviously considered a price worth paying in order to 'combat climate change' and the whole scam is a wonderful opportunity for politicians to posture on the world stage demonstrating their 'green' credentials. But I digress.
Next up was American Secretary of State, John Kerry, offering an extra billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned money without consulting the peoples Congress first.
During the last two Presidential campaigns, in addition to a trillion dollar stimulus package, the call for increased infrastructure spending was relentless. Roads and bridges are falling apart and a totally new distribution system is needed to replace the conventional energy delivery with that of green energy.
John Kerry has been traversing the planet preaching that 'climate change' is the biggest threat to world peace in the history of civilization. Therefore, with that in mind, the American taxpayers will be the main contributor to a one hundred billion dollar fund to help developing countries pay for the damage due to 'climate change' which, apparently, was selfishly caused by the west, and also to help them 'combat climate change' in the future. (Just to clarify, the one hundred billion dollars is an annual sum not just a one off payment)
American taxpayers also generously finance a fifty two billion dollar foreign aid budget which includes six hundred and fifteen million per year to oil rich Nigeria, six hundred and eighty eight million annually to Mexico and an eye watering four billion per year to the notoriously corrupt Mohammed Karsai government in Afghanistan.
Judging by the rate at which politicians spend taxpayers money in America, the country has got to be rolling in the stuff, they must be lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bills in Washington DC.
Hot on the heels of John Kerry was the European Union bureaucrats, led by the unelected political crony, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, with promises to Ukraine of a windfall of taxpayers money from her endless supply of it in Brussels.
Baroness Ashton labours under the grandiose title of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security and Vice President of the European Commission - this entitles her to a massive taxpayer funded remuneration package plus expenses and a gold plated pension on retirement. In addition, she is a member of the House of Lords for life which entitles her to another package of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses. (Three hundred quid per day just for turning up. That's around four hundred and eighty US Dollars)
Like their American cousins, there is apparently no shortage of British taxpayers money for these politicians and bureaucrats to spray around everywhere except to alleviate hardship in their home countries. These people have no respect for taxpayers money therefore they have no respect for the taxpayers themselves.
Also in the queue to dump money into the Ukraine are the IMF and the World Bank.
Having established that politicians and global institutions alike are lining up to hose money into the Ukraine, it's worth noting that like Great Britain, Greece and the rest of the European Union, the United States of America is broke, it has no money and it is fast running out of credit.
In order to look generous, and get the credit from the international aid industry, the politicians and bureaucrats are willfully ignoring the fact that the money being sprayed around belongs to the taxpayer - it is the fruit of their labour that has been confiscated under threat of imprisonment.
These self serving egotists are spending wages that are yet to be earned by people yet to be born. They are unconscionable, unscrupulous and utterly without principle.
The countries with the biggest national debts in the world include the USA, Great Britain, France and Germany. These same countries have also been running the biggest budget deficits. Taxpayers from these countries are the biggest contributors to the international institutions that want to dump money into the Ukraine.
To put this into some kind of perspective - British government spending is running at a deficit of over one hundred and ten billion pounds per year and they have accumulated a national debt in excess of one trillion pounds. British taxpayers are already helping to finance the UN, the IMF and the World Bank.
They are also contributing close to forty billion pounds per year to the EU and will be handing out some fourteen billion per year on overseas aid to prosperous nations and dictators. Great Britain has a crumbling infrastructure, a shortage of houses, schools and hospitals; increasing numbers of people cannot pay their heating bills and rely on food banks to survive. The question that begs to be asked is:
Where is Chancellor Osborne getting the money from to give the Ukrainians a blank cheque?
With a seventeen trillion dollar debt and out of control government spending, the situation that American taxpayers find themselves in is no different, therefore the question equally applies to John Kerry:
Where is the extra one billion dollars coming from?
It should be borne in mind that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait UAE, Brazil, Norway, South Korean and Switzerland have little or no national debt and run small deficits or surpluses - one would think that these countries would be head of the queue to aid the Ukraine.
It's noticeable that the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emirs of the wealthy Arab states are missing from the airwaves joining the leaders of the other aforementioned affluent countries in anonymity and leaving the taxpayers of the bankrupt countries to help the Ukrainian people.
In conclusion it is worth pointing out that apart from an infrastructure compatible with any other industrialised country, the Ukraine is rich in natural resources such as iron ore, manganese, nickel and uranium with more than half the country consisting of arable agricultural land. The government of the Ukraine also has a reputation for reneging on its loans and debt repayments.
By any measure Ukraine is not a good risk for taxpayers money but that won't stop the politicians when there is an opportunity to preen themselves on the world stage polishing their egos and their compassionate credentials.
Finally a little light relief from Abba:
I work all night, I work all day to pay the bills I have to pay
Ain't it sad
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me
That's too bad
Money Money Money, must be funny, in the rich mans world
Money Money Money, always sunny, in the rich mans world
Aha Ahaa
All the things that I could do
If I had a little money, in the rich mans world.
Listen to it here and you'll be singing it to yourself all day.
Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Politicians Want Open Borders For Syrian Refugees - The People Do Not
Judging by recent news in the western media it would appear that the refugee crisis caused by the Syrian civil war is highlighting once again the yawning chasm that exists between the political class and the people they are supposed to represent. It also represents the creeping ongoing attempt by the professional bureaucrats in the United Nations to take upon itself the role of a global government.
The reality of the Syrian tragedy gets lost in the dust kicked up by the political class as they jostle and elbow each other in their pathetic attempts to demonstrate their humanitarian credentials.
Syria's tragedy is just one of many going on around the world where people are forced to flee from their homes as a result of violence perpetrated either by insurgents of some kind or despotic governments repressing their own people.
The political class needs to explain why the Syria crisis has suddenly become the focus of their attention above violent episodes elsewhere in the world. They also need to answer a multitude of other questions before they do their usual trick of ignoring the will of the people and opening the borders to what we all know will be tens of thousands of economic migrants not refugees.
Bashar al Assad didn't become a blood thirsty despot overnight; he's always been one, as was his blood soaked father before him. The so called humanitarian political class tolerated their excesses for two generations as they tortured and murdered anyone who spoke up against their tyranny.
These so called humanitarians have tolerated the excesses of any number of despots and ignored the suffering of their people. In many cases the have supplied the materials, including arms and equipment that has enabled these despots to function.
It would appear that the world is divided into acceptable or unacceptable blood thirsty despots depending on their usefulness to the politicians of the day.
Bashar al Assad, a former dining companion of 'Hanoi' John Kerry, has obviously been moved from the acceptable to the unacceptable category.
To the horror of the hard pressed British people, the Labour party is calling on the government to open the borders to Syrian refugees ignoring the fact that refugees from war torn countries such as Sri Lanka and Afghanistan never returned home when their respective conflicts wound down but claimed asylum and stayed.
The British people have learned from bitter experience that when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, the political class and the bureaucrats unashamedly lie through their teeth and use the situation to burnish their humanitarian credentials and progress their cultural replacement agenda.
These much abused citizens have had their fill of diversity, cultural enrichment and 'shared values'.
They have also had their fill of ungrateful immigrants from Muslim countries taking advantage of their compassion and generosity, then joining the jihad or beheading a British soldier on streets of London in broad daylight.
The last thing the British people need is a battalion of battle hardened young Muslim men from Syria joining their co-religionists from Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, violently turning against their hosts or joining in their jihad against the west.
For the benefit of the politicians who may be reading this, the British people don't care about your humanitarian credentials, enough is enough.
The European Union bureaucrats in the Brussels Commission are calling on their member countries to open their borders and the UN bureaucrats in New York are calling on the United States to do the same.
In the case of the EU bureaucrats, they know full well, as do the long suffering people, that no Syrian refugee is going to want to go to countries such as Romania, Bulgaria or Croatia.
Furthermore, how can the impoverished people of Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal possibly support an influx of refugees when their bankrupt economies cannot support their own people.
The truth is that Great Britain and the United States will be the destination of any exodus from Syria and they won't be returning home when the war is over. Having experienced the largesse of these governments they will remain behind, particularly in Great Britain where they will be showered with welfare benefits care of the taxpayer.
The politicians and bureaucrats from the EU and the UN are highlighting the fact that Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis. They are failing to mention the fact that there are some fifty seven Muslim countries around the world, many of which are peaceful and awash with money that could easily absorb an influx of their co-religionists without any cultural or religious conflict.
The EU and the UN bureaucrats are calling on western countries who are only now emerging from an economic recession and not on rich Muslim countries to take Muslim refugees from what is essentially an internal Muslim conflict.
They are not calling on oil rich Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar or the fabulously wealthy United Arab Emirates. They are not calling on Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to name but a few. There is no need for western countries to open their borders to people who, when all things are said and done, despise the Anglo-Saxon, Judeao-Christian west and want it destroyed.
Beside their wealth and Muslim faith these Islamic countries also enjoy a much better climate than that cold, wet, windswept island in the north Atlantic. What could possibly be the attraction?
The fact that the Syrian crisis is not unique exposes the hypocrisy and double standards of the political class that the people now accept as normal political discourse. Obviously some blood soaked despots are more acceptable than others.
Despots that have been transferred from the acceptable to the unacceptable category include Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic, Egypt's Hosni Murbarak and Pakistan's General Mursharaf.
Some despots have moved the other way from unacceptable to acceptable including, Wen Jiabao of China and 'Mad Dog' Gadaffi went from unacceptable to acceptable and back to unacceptable in a matter of years.
Robert Mugabe, the butcher of Zimbabwe for some thirty years, remains in the acceptable category by virtue of the fact that he is still there murdering away in full view of the political class, the European Union and the United Nations.
As mentioned, the conflict in Syria is not unique, there are presently serious conflicts going on in Uganda, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Mali, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Yemen, Libya, the Philippines and Burma which have all resulted in population displacement.
These conflicts will not be solved by transferring their populations to the west. On the contrary it will only sow the seeds of future conflicts by forcing one culture to accept another with which it is totally incompatible.
The reality of the Syrian tragedy gets lost in the dust kicked up by the political class as they jostle and elbow each other in their pathetic attempts to demonstrate their humanitarian credentials.
Syria's tragedy is just one of many going on around the world where people are forced to flee from their homes as a result of violence perpetrated either by insurgents of some kind or despotic governments repressing their own people.
The political class needs to explain why the Syria crisis has suddenly become the focus of their attention above violent episodes elsewhere in the world. They also need to answer a multitude of other questions before they do their usual trick of ignoring the will of the people and opening the borders to what we all know will be tens of thousands of economic migrants not refugees.
Bashar al Assad didn't become a blood thirsty despot overnight; he's always been one, as was his blood soaked father before him. The so called humanitarian political class tolerated their excesses for two generations as they tortured and murdered anyone who spoke up against their tyranny.
These so called humanitarians have tolerated the excesses of any number of despots and ignored the suffering of their people. In many cases the have supplied the materials, including arms and equipment that has enabled these despots to function.
It would appear that the world is divided into acceptable or unacceptable blood thirsty despots depending on their usefulness to the politicians of the day.
Bashar al Assad, a former dining companion of 'Hanoi' John Kerry, has obviously been moved from the acceptable to the unacceptable category.
To the horror of the hard pressed British people, the Labour party is calling on the government to open the borders to Syrian refugees ignoring the fact that refugees from war torn countries such as Sri Lanka and Afghanistan never returned home when their respective conflicts wound down but claimed asylum and stayed.
The British people have learned from bitter experience that when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, the political class and the bureaucrats unashamedly lie through their teeth and use the situation to burnish their humanitarian credentials and progress their cultural replacement agenda.
These much abused citizens have had their fill of diversity, cultural enrichment and 'shared values'.
They have also had their fill of ungrateful immigrants from Muslim countries taking advantage of their compassion and generosity, then joining the jihad or beheading a British soldier on streets of London in broad daylight.
The last thing the British people need is a battalion of battle hardened young Muslim men from Syria joining their co-religionists from Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, violently turning against their hosts or joining in their jihad against the west.
For the benefit of the politicians who may be reading this, the British people don't care about your humanitarian credentials, enough is enough.
The European Union bureaucrats in the Brussels Commission are calling on their member countries to open their borders and the UN bureaucrats in New York are calling on the United States to do the same.
In the case of the EU bureaucrats, they know full well, as do the long suffering people, that no Syrian refugee is going to want to go to countries such as Romania, Bulgaria or Croatia.
Furthermore, how can the impoverished people of Greece, Ireland, Spain or Portugal possibly support an influx of refugees when their bankrupt economies cannot support their own people.
The truth is that Great Britain and the United States will be the destination of any exodus from Syria and they won't be returning home when the war is over. Having experienced the largesse of these governments they will remain behind, particularly in Great Britain where they will be showered with welfare benefits care of the taxpayer.
The politicians and bureaucrats from the EU and the UN are highlighting the fact that Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis. They are failing to mention the fact that there are some fifty seven Muslim countries around the world, many of which are peaceful and awash with money that could easily absorb an influx of their co-religionists without any cultural or religious conflict.
The EU and the UN bureaucrats are calling on western countries who are only now emerging from an economic recession and not on rich Muslim countries to take Muslim refugees from what is essentially an internal Muslim conflict.
They are not calling on oil rich Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar or the fabulously wealthy United Arab Emirates. They are not calling on Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to name but a few. There is no need for western countries to open their borders to people who, when all things are said and done, despise the Anglo-Saxon, Judeao-Christian west and want it destroyed.
Beside their wealth and Muslim faith these Islamic countries also enjoy a much better climate than that cold, wet, windswept island in the north Atlantic. What could possibly be the attraction?
The fact that the Syrian crisis is not unique exposes the hypocrisy and double standards of the political class that the people now accept as normal political discourse. Obviously some blood soaked despots are more acceptable than others.
Despots that have been transferred from the acceptable to the unacceptable category include Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic, Egypt's Hosni Murbarak and Pakistan's General Mursharaf.
Some despots have moved the other way from unacceptable to acceptable including, Wen Jiabao of China and 'Mad Dog' Gadaffi went from unacceptable to acceptable and back to unacceptable in a matter of years.
Robert Mugabe, the butcher of Zimbabwe for some thirty years, remains in the acceptable category by virtue of the fact that he is still there murdering away in full view of the political class, the European Union and the United Nations.
As mentioned, the conflict in Syria is not unique, there are presently serious conflicts going on in Uganda, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Mali, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Yemen, Libya, the Philippines and Burma which have all resulted in population displacement.
These conflicts will not be solved by transferring their populations to the west. On the contrary it will only sow the seeds of future conflicts by forcing one culture to accept another with which it is totally incompatible.
Friday, September 6, 2013
Putin Humiliates Great Britain and America - Oh How The Mighty Have Fallen
Watching macho man President Putin using the G20 summit to impose himself and his country onto the world stage is a wonder to behold. Conversely, watching the pathetic performances of the Western leaders in response is an indication of how degraded their countries have become.
As the world knows, President Putin is nothing more than a KGB thug who uses the residual power of his former organization coupled with outright corruption to stay in power. Putin can put a lifetime of experience in the world of intrigue and power politics to achieve his dubious ends.
His two main antagonists are media created products of the Public Relations world with no experience in anything other than advertising, spin, media management and lying. One would think with this experience they would win the PR battle with Putin outright but it is now clear that he is beating them hands down at their own game.
To the inhabitants of the world outside of the comfortable, entitlement obsessed, politically correct West, President Putin is the macho hard man who spends his free time in the great outdoors and who is habitually photographed riding horses, grappling bare chested with giant fish or shooting bears in the wilderness. This may be PR but he is going some way to restoring the image of mighty Russia, and the developing world lap it up as opposed to what the 'progressive' West has to offer.
Barack Obama and David Cameron are two cheeks of the same a*se, they were both plucked from obscurity early in their lives and groomed for high office by the 'progressive' elite that seems to dictate world affairs outside of public scrutiny.
While Putin gives the impression of offering the world traditional values and policies which appeal to ordinary people and with which they can identify, the Western world led by Obama and Cameron are imposing the gender neutral, equality obsessed, multi-cultural policies of a secretive 'progressive' elite which appeal to nobody but themselves.
Obama and Cameron have turned the Western world into a laughing stock with their unwanted 'progressive' nonsense such as their obsession with sexuality politics and gay marriage, government imposed equality and fairness, degrading their once mighty military machines by social engineering, perverting and politicising their institutions to the point where their dedication to political correctness makes them unable to carry out the functions they were created to perform.
It's an indication of how far the mighty have fallen when a political thug from a mostly lawless, vodka drenched giant gypsy camp can dismiss Great Britain as "a small island- nobody pays any attention to them apart from the Russian oligarchs who have bought Chelsea". Ouch!
He has the confidence to call US Secretary of State, 'Hanoi' John Kerry a liar over al Qaeda involvement in Syria. The fact that both jibes are true does not alter the greater fact that the status of Great Britain and America is so diminished that their history can be ignored and they can be insulted and abused like seven stone weaklings in a school playground.
The British and American people have no one to blame but themselves when they take a long, hard look at the quality of person they have elected to represent them on the world stage.
To the ordinary people of the world David Cameron is more like a limp wristed Hugh Grant than a giant of Sir Winston Churchill's stature. His defence against Putin's insult has been compared to Grant in 'Love Actually'. Cameron's stated objective was to purge the Conservative party of the very policies that put the 'Great' in Britain and make it more modern and trendy; in the process he has finished a degrading project started years earlier by his political predecessor and traitor, Edward Heath.
Instead of building on the historical greatness of his country and using the relationships built up over centuries to positive effect, he is carrying on with the policy of managed decline initiated by his political predecessors in order to bring about an 'equality of nations' as required by the perverted notion of national and cultural relativity.
The people of the once great USA are now finding out to their cost what the British people have been enduring for decades. One would have thought that they would have been learning from the degradation being suffered by their trans-Atlantic cousins and taking steps to avoid a repetition in their beloved homeland.
What in God's name were they thinking when they fell for a vacuous, media created fake like Barack Obama? The facts were there for all to see. He was an empty suit without a history or any qualifications other than hanging out with Marxist professors, smoking dope and 'community organising'.
What makes matters worse was that after a disastrous first term, which he kicked off with an apology tour of the world, he wrecked the economy and humiliated the military by introducing the sexuality agenda. They then went and re-elected him for another term.
Obama's performance at the G20 is juvenile and an embarrassment for the American people. He is on record for all to see declaring his red line over chemical weapons in Syria and no amount of spin can alter this. His attempt at denial is more than pathetic and typical of the cowardice he displays with his constant blaming of others. Even 'Hanoi' John Kerry confirms Obama's red line.
The world no longer has any respect for Great Britain or the USA and as a result, the enemies of freedom are emboldened, the world is a more dangerous place and will remain so as long as these two media created fakes are in charge.
Great Britain is being harassed by Christina de Kircher, the mad woman of Argentina over the Falkland Islands; and by the bankrupt Spanish over Gibraltar. Britain is being overrun by beggars, street criminals and welfare colonists and Cameron is powerless to stop it. Cameron is managing the further decline of a once great civilization.
The United States of America is not far behind Great Britain and its decline will only accelerate while President Obama remains in power.
America's welfare bill is growing by the day with record numbers of scroungers shamelessly trading the work ethic that made America great for 'free stuff' that is earned by some one else.
The once mighty NASA is reduced to outreaching to the Muslim world and what's left of America's astronaut community have to hitch a ride to the Space Station they created from Vladimir Putin's Russia.
America's once mighty military is now a vehicle for social engineering and sexuality politics. It may still have enormous firepower but it has no respect. America's enemies, especially those who worship death instead of life, are losing their fear and are looking forward with relish to meeting the first all women or gay regiments on the battlefield.
Pictures speak louder than words and the images that went around the world of the President of the United States of America bowing down to the King of Saudi Arabia has damaged the reputation of this administration and the country.
At this rate it will only be a matter of time before a real Count Rupert from a Duchy of Grand Fenwick fancies his chances.
As the world knows, President Putin is nothing more than a KGB thug who uses the residual power of his former organization coupled with outright corruption to stay in power. Putin can put a lifetime of experience in the world of intrigue and power politics to achieve his dubious ends.
His two main antagonists are media created products of the Public Relations world with no experience in anything other than advertising, spin, media management and lying. One would think with this experience they would win the PR battle with Putin outright but it is now clear that he is beating them hands down at their own game.
To the inhabitants of the world outside of the comfortable, entitlement obsessed, politically correct West, President Putin is the macho hard man who spends his free time in the great outdoors and who is habitually photographed riding horses, grappling bare chested with giant fish or shooting bears in the wilderness. This may be PR but he is going some way to restoring the image of mighty Russia, and the developing world lap it up as opposed to what the 'progressive' West has to offer.
Barack Obama and David Cameron are two cheeks of the same a*se, they were both plucked from obscurity early in their lives and groomed for high office by the 'progressive' elite that seems to dictate world affairs outside of public scrutiny.
While Putin gives the impression of offering the world traditional values and policies which appeal to ordinary people and with which they can identify, the Western world led by Obama and Cameron are imposing the gender neutral, equality obsessed, multi-cultural policies of a secretive 'progressive' elite which appeal to nobody but themselves.
Obama and Cameron have turned the Western world into a laughing stock with their unwanted 'progressive' nonsense such as their obsession with sexuality politics and gay marriage, government imposed equality and fairness, degrading their once mighty military machines by social engineering, perverting and politicising their institutions to the point where their dedication to political correctness makes them unable to carry out the functions they were created to perform.
It's an indication of how far the mighty have fallen when a political thug from a mostly lawless, vodka drenched giant gypsy camp can dismiss Great Britain as "a small island- nobody pays any attention to them apart from the Russian oligarchs who have bought Chelsea". Ouch!
He has the confidence to call US Secretary of State, 'Hanoi' John Kerry a liar over al Qaeda involvement in Syria. The fact that both jibes are true does not alter the greater fact that the status of Great Britain and America is so diminished that their history can be ignored and they can be insulted and abused like seven stone weaklings in a school playground.
The British and American people have no one to blame but themselves when they take a long, hard look at the quality of person they have elected to represent them on the world stage.
To the ordinary people of the world David Cameron is more like a limp wristed Hugh Grant than a giant of Sir Winston Churchill's stature. His defence against Putin's insult has been compared to Grant in 'Love Actually'. Cameron's stated objective was to purge the Conservative party of the very policies that put the 'Great' in Britain and make it more modern and trendy; in the process he has finished a degrading project started years earlier by his political predecessor and traitor, Edward Heath.
Instead of building on the historical greatness of his country and using the relationships built up over centuries to positive effect, he is carrying on with the policy of managed decline initiated by his political predecessors in order to bring about an 'equality of nations' as required by the perverted notion of national and cultural relativity.
The people of the once great USA are now finding out to their cost what the British people have been enduring for decades. One would have thought that they would have been learning from the degradation being suffered by their trans-Atlantic cousins and taking steps to avoid a repetition in their beloved homeland.
What in God's name were they thinking when they fell for a vacuous, media created fake like Barack Obama? The facts were there for all to see. He was an empty suit without a history or any qualifications other than hanging out with Marxist professors, smoking dope and 'community organising'.
What makes matters worse was that after a disastrous first term, which he kicked off with an apology tour of the world, he wrecked the economy and humiliated the military by introducing the sexuality agenda. They then went and re-elected him for another term.
Obama's performance at the G20 is juvenile and an embarrassment for the American people. He is on record for all to see declaring his red line over chemical weapons in Syria and no amount of spin can alter this. His attempt at denial is more than pathetic and typical of the cowardice he displays with his constant blaming of others. Even 'Hanoi' John Kerry confirms Obama's red line.
The world no longer has any respect for Great Britain or the USA and as a result, the enemies of freedom are emboldened, the world is a more dangerous place and will remain so as long as these two media created fakes are in charge.
Great Britain is being harassed by Christina de Kircher, the mad woman of Argentina over the Falkland Islands; and by the bankrupt Spanish over Gibraltar. Britain is being overrun by beggars, street criminals and welfare colonists and Cameron is powerless to stop it. Cameron is managing the further decline of a once great civilization.
The United States of America is not far behind Great Britain and its decline will only accelerate while President Obama remains in power.
America's welfare bill is growing by the day with record numbers of scroungers shamelessly trading the work ethic that made America great for 'free stuff' that is earned by some one else.
The once mighty NASA is reduced to outreaching to the Muslim world and what's left of America's astronaut community have to hitch a ride to the Space Station they created from Vladimir Putin's Russia.
America's once mighty military is now a vehicle for social engineering and sexuality politics. It may still have enormous firepower but it has no respect. America's enemies, especially those who worship death instead of life, are losing their fear and are looking forward with relish to meeting the first all women or gay regiments on the battlefield.
Pictures speak louder than words and the images that went around the world of the President of the United States of America bowing down to the King of Saudi Arabia has damaged the reputation of this administration and the country.
At this rate it will only be a matter of time before a real Count Rupert from a Duchy of Grand Fenwick fancies his chances.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)