'This Is What A Feminist Looks Like' - PR Stunt Hides The Truth

The days when political discourse revolved around the various candidates publicly debating the issues disappeared when psephologists, pollsters and PR men took over elections, devaluing democracy in the process.

Democracy in Great Britain has been reduced to periodic elections where teams of spin doctors, marketing professionals and media managers create false images for a group of bland, photogenic automatons who possess the innate ability to lie with a straight face.

These generic candidates will be required to flawlessly repeat soundbites and slogans which are centrally generated by their various party PR and media management machines. They will also be required to take part in publicity stunts which for the cynical voter are sometimes so embarrassingly false they are a source of much hilarity.

Any PR person worth their salt would agree that a picture is worth a thousand words especially when trying to create an image or deliver a message that they want the public to swallow. Unfortunately for them, due to the Internet, they no longer have a monopoly of messaging therefore the same tactic can be used to strip away the veneer and reveal the truth.

Wearing a "This is what a feminist looks like" T-shirt in the House of Commons was a publicity stunt led by the Labour Party's premier feminist Harriet Harman. The message may have suited her reputation as a champion of women's rights but it also hid the truth about Harman and her 'progressive' agenda. Therefore taking leaf out of her PR departments book, here are some photographs to put the record straight.

"This is what a paedophile supporter looks like". One who wants to legalise sex between adults and children.

"This what a Muslim paedophile gang looks like". The gang that groomed, raped and sexually abused under age white girls with the full knowledge and connivance of her Labour Party on the grounds of 'cultural sensitivity'.

"This what a young female victim of a the Labour Party's client group of paedophiles would look like" if one could face the camera.

In the top photograph Harman is flanked on the left by her party leader Red Ed Miliband and on the right by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, the current leader of the ever more ridiculous Liberal Democrat Party.

"This is what a Liberal Democrat deviant looks like". The one that had a relationship with a young female constituent with special needs who originally came to him for help. Clegg finally acknowledged he knew about this but took no action at the time.

When senior politicians engage in publicity stunts of this nature they not only make themselves look ridiculous they also demean politics and embarrass the nation at the same time. Informed people are not fooled by this kind of cheap stunt and as has just been demonstrated they can be used to reveal the truth as well as to deceive.


Finally a couple of publicity stunts for your mirth and enjoyment:


 "This is what a pair of idiots look like when going after the Sikh vote".


 .









Update: Check The Mellow Jihadi for more Red Ed publicity stunt hilarity.

Angelina Jolie And William Hague Distract Attention From Peacetime Rape

Despite the fact that she is only an actress, Angelina Jolie must rank as one of the most influential people among those who consider themselves to be the global movers and shakers.  Add to that the fact that she is married to Brad Pitt then the drawing power of this couple is increased beyond measure.

The ability to generate publicity on this scale can be used in a positive way to the benefit of millions of the less fortunate or in a negative way as the antics of imbeciles like Justin Bieber demonstrate.

The media gave Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt blanket coverage recently when they teamed up with the British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, to progress their campaign of tackling the issue of rape during wars. The campaign centred on Bosnia where a vicious and bloody civil war claimed the lives of tens of thousands of innocent civilians and where some fifty thousand men, women and children were the victims of rape.

Jolie, Pitt and Hague must be commended for using their celebrity to generate publicity for such a noble cause and hopefully their action to get as many of the perpetrators prosecuted will come to fruition. In addition to visiting Sarajevo, they have also visited other war zones such as Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo where rape was endemic during their respective civil wars.
(See the story here and here)

Looking a little deeper into the issue of rape, Angelina Jolie, who is fronting the campaign, has overlooked the fact that her efforts are not without their negative side and one has to wonder whether she has chosen the wrong target. By using her considerable ability to draw the media's attention to war zone rape , she has inadvertently taken the spotlight off horrific rapes that have recently been in the news elsewhere.

The world was shocked and horrified when young girls were not only gang raped in India but hung from a tree afterwards. Young girls were being gang raped on the transportation systems, including buses, with one unfortunate lady dying from the injuries she sustained during a particularly brutal attack.

In a country that is renown for its poor treatment of women, the negative global publicity that ensued had the effect of forcing the government and the police to act in the women's interests not only with the issue of personal safety but of women's rights in general.

Jolie's campaign has distracted the attention away from India and apparently the momentum for change has been lost, much to the relief of the authorities no doubt.

Looking at the issue of rape in a wider context, its been twenty years since the war in Bosnia ended and although fifty thousand rapes during the three year conflict is an appalling number it is a minor statistic when compared to rape generally.

When discussing war time rape it is worth remembering that rape and pillage has always been an indulgence of war from time immemorial, the spoils of war had always been counted in treasure, slaves and concubines.

In ancient times Alexander the Great indulged as did the Romans before the Vikings took things to whole new level. During the Second World War the Germans raped, pillaged and murdered their way across Russia before the Russians did the same as they conquered Germany. It is estimated that over a million German women were raped after the fall of Berlin.

It could be argued that the way to end rape during war is to stop war from starting in the first place and that is unlikely to happen. Angelina Jolie's campaign to bring the perpetrators to justice however remains right, proper and noble.

But what of rape during peacetime? The statistics are shocking and although there are no mitigating circumstances for rape, one would think that rape on this scale outside the heat of battle would be more deserving of Angelina Jolie's attention.

As mentioned earlier some fifty thousand people were raped during the three year Bosnian conflict but according to UN statistics eighty thousand were raped in the USA between 2004 and 2010. Even this is overshadowed by the US Justice Department figures of some three hundred thousand rapes per year. (That's 300,000 per year)
(See the DOJ report here and more stats here)

When looking at the country by country rape statistics, and they do vary considerably depending on source, the USA, India, Great Britain, South Africa, Mexico, Germany, Russia, Sweden, Belgium, Lesotho, Botswana and Canada are consistently at the top.
(See one such report here)

As the British Foreign Secretary William Hague will be well aware, the rape crises in some European Union countries is a scandal that is being deliberately ignored on the grounds of cultural sensitivity and political correctness.

Rape in Sweden is now reaching epidemic proportions due mainly to the sudden influx of Muslims. According to some statistics, one in four Swedish women will be raped by a Muslim in their lifetime. The Swedish government are renown for their craven obedience to the EU and they are at the forefront of the campaign to impose multi-culturalism across the continent but this shouldn't be at the cost of their women's safety.
(See Swedish rape stats here)

Sweden considers itself to be the vanguard of 'progressivism' in the EU and prides itself on its record of equality and women's rights but as one commentator noted they can have women's rights or Islam but they can't have both.
(See a report here, also Muslims rape 300 Swedish children in seven months, see here)

The story is the same in Belgium where there were five gang rapes in a single week carried out by Muslim gangs with similar horror stories in all other European countries and in countries as far away as Canada and Australia.
(See here and here)

In Great Britain, the adherence to the cultural replacement agenda by the political class is the stuff of legend; this is where the authorities including the local councils, teachers, socials services and the police 'service' ignored Muslims paedophile gangs in most of the major cities on the grounds of cultural sensitivity.

Hundreds of underage white girls were groomed then subjected to horrific sexual abuse, including gang rape, with the complicit approval of the authorities.
(See stories here)

In conclusion I will add that once the objectives of Angelina Jolie's campaign against war rape are achieved, she should concentrate her efforts on peacetime rape which is a far bigger issue and more widespread.

William Hague is well aware of the rape epidemic engulfing Great Britain and Europe, which includes the rape of children, and he should bring his influence to bear on Angelina Jolie and urge her to use her publicity generating prowess to combat peacetime rape. She should draw particular attention to Muslim gangs, who believe that all western women are prostitutes, and who are ruining the lives of thousands of victims across the continent and the wider world at large.

Some previous posts on Muslim child sex abuse in Great Britain here and here.

Update: Teenager raped by 30 men in Birmingham, UK. It's not a war zone so Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and William Hague are not interested. See here.

New Battle Of Britain - EU Federalists Claim British People Are More Racist Today

The long planned tactic of the government-media complex to preserve the political establishment's hegemony over the British people is to accuse anyone who questions their cultural replacement agenda of racism.

This organised campaign of vilification and smear against opponents of open border mass immigration was never more apparent than during the recent EU election campaign.  UKIP, the party now referred to as the Peoples Party, was the main target of this campaign with its leader Nigel Farage subjected to a particularly nasty campaign of smear and abuse.

One would think that with the election over and the triumph of UKIP over the old established order, they would pause, take stock and analyse the effectiveness of their campaign. If so they would come to the same conclusion as everyone else, that their tactic of ignoring the issues but smearing their opponents instead only served to harden support for UKIP.  More importantly their overuse of the 'racist' tag rendered it ineffective.

With the publication of a NatCen British Social Attitudes survey it's obvious that the 'racist' smear will continue to be the weapon of choice against UKIP, Nigel Farage and anyone who has the temerity to question the cultural replacement or the open border mass immigration agenda of the old political order.

It's worth noting at this point that the old political order not only includes the three leaders of the legacy parties, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband, but past luminaries such as former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the first family of troughing, Neil and Glenys Kinnock together with the recently resurrected Tony Blair.

Many observers around the world will be wondering if the British people will display their gratitude to Blair for sacrificing some of his valuable money making time to bless them with the benefit of his undoubted wisdom. (See yesterdays post)

The survey itself, which was most likely commissioned by the government-media complex, is a continuation of the 'racist' theme which will make up the core tactic of their campaign into the next years general election.

According to the survey, racist attitudes in Great Britain have risen to one third from one quarter since the millennium when, apparently, there was little prejudice against people of other races.

Unsurprisingly, the worse culprits are:

a) male.

b) the over 55's.

c) the least educated.

d) manual workers.

e) people in the West Midlands

f) Conservative voters.

Without access to the questions or the ethnic makeup of the participants, this breakdown could be interpreted  as an attempt to demonise by association.

Another point that makes this survey appear suspicious is the reasons they give for the increase in racist behavior.

The survey concludes that: 

"the marked turning around in the figures suggested that this change could be linked to the impact of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 in the USA. Or with people feeling concerned about the impact of immigration in their area".

This statement, suggesting that the British people are more racist today because of 9/11 is risible, but by putting UKIP in the same sentence as the openly racist British National Party (BNP), it exposes the survey as nothing more than an unsubtle piece of establishment propaganda.

The offending sentence reads:

"The last decade has seen the rise of the BNP and UKIP which could explain part of the increase".

So there we have it the rise of UKIP explains the rise of racism in Great Britain.

The term 'racist' is applied to anyone who questions the old establishment agenda of cultural replacement and open border mass immigration and therefore it is no longer considered an insult, especially if it is used in the course of an election campaign by people who have lost the debate on the issues.

The majority of the indigenous British people are not hate filled racists who despise foreigners because they are xenophobes. They are honest, decent people who love their country and don't want it to see their way of life destroyed or their values trashed by unscrupulous, unprincipled self serving charlatans like Tony Blair, David Cameron, Nick Clegg or Red Ed Miliband.

I would add that the British people are concerned about mass immigration not because of malice or racism but because of fear that if nothing is done then the disaster that has been visited upon their fellow citizens in the following stories will be visited upon them and their children some time in the future:

Great Britain is now the United Nations of Crime with criminals from 160 countries filling our jails. One in seven inmates are foreigners and they include murderers, rapists, burglars, paedophiles drug dealers etc.

Immigrant Crime rate soars with prisons full of foreign criminals.

750 criminals including, killers, rapists, violent robber and drug dealers are on run after being released or absconding because they cannot be deported on orders from the EU.

Taxpayers pay 25 million pounds to keep 850 prisoners in jail after their sentences have been served because they are too dangerous to release and the EU will not allow their deportation.

The police are investigating 54 Muslim paedophile gangs across England and Wales.

Rochdale Muslim paedophile gang that preyed on underage white girls are jailed for 77 years.

Rotherham Asian paedophile gang jailed for 32 years.

And so on and so forth.

In conclusion I would add that the people who advocate open border mass immigration never have to suffer the consequences of what they impose on others.

Furthermore it is outrageous that multi-millionaire socialist Tony Blair, the self described "straight kinda guy", the owner of ten houses, including a country mansion, to accuse people who have paid a heavy price for his policies, of racism.