Harry and Meghan Play the Race Card and Insult the Nation

Watching the slow-motion descent of former action man Prince Harry into a simpering wimp dominated by his plastic ever-so-woke Hollywood starlet is a tragedy beyond measure for the Monarchy and its supporters.

All the respect and admiration earned by Prince Harry on the battlefields of Afghanistan evaporated into the ether when he caved in and surrendered to the domination of his Trump hating, champagne socialist disciple of all the usual Hollywood causes.

As soon as it was announced that Prince Harry had taken up with a diva from the Hollywood acting fraternity Royal watchers and pundits alike knew in their hearts it would end badly for Harry.

Initially people respected their decision to withdraw from royal duties because they wanted to enjoy a private family life and raise their son Archie away from the publicity that plagued Harry’s mother Diana.

The public respect for Harry and his reputation started to evaporate when Meghan dropped the royal princess act and resumed her previous life as a narcissist from planet Hollywood where seeking publicity is a way of life.

They could have just left Great Britain and started their new life away from cameras, but the Hollywood diva and her Prince Charming couldn’t resist throwing a few insults at the Royal family and the British people on their way out of the door.

Meghan is entitled to her opinion on royal life and many would agree that it can be stifling at times, but she knew that before she joined and certainly knew it before she married into the firm.

Her assertion that getting away from the royal family was a ‘matter of life and death’ is typical hyperbole from a Hollywood diva whose raison d’etre is to be the center of attention and first in line for public exposure as opposed to sixth in line as she was with the Windsors.

To a narcissistic Hollywood diva, being sixth in line behind a commoner like the classy and popular Catherine, Duchess of Gloucester, must rankle to high heaven and too much for her ego to bear.

Being the generous souls that the British people are, Meghan’s attitude toward the royal family can be forgiven but the charge of racism she leveled against them cannot and shame on Harry for going along with it.

With the help of the agenda driven mainstream media, who are also embracing the ‘woke' culture, Harry and Meghan are now claiming that they were driven out of Great Britain by racism.

He could have made the accusation of racism before meeting Meghan and used his position to highlight it but it was only after their decision to leave the country that he went public with his belief that the British people were racist.  To mitigate his ludicrous statement Harry claims the British people are racist without knowing it. They are unconsciously racist.

In support of Meghan and Harry’s reason for leaving, an agenda driven ‘woke’ lecturer on race and ethnicity at Edgehill University on Merseyside, a Ms. Rachel Boyle, claimed hysterically on national television that …..”its racism. She’s a black woman and she’s been torn to pieces by the press”. One would think that a lecturer on race and ethnicity would know that Meghan Markle has a white father which makes her just as white as she is black.

Using Ms. Boyle's criteria Barack Obama is a white man along with the late reggae star, Bob Marley. It would also make Tiger Woods a Thai and Jimi Hendrix a Cherokee Indian. 

If anyone is going to indulge in identity politics in order to smear a nation it pays to do a little research first.

In the unpopularity stakes Sarah Ferguson, the former wife of Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, led the pack followed closely by Princess Michael of Kent.

The former was ridiculed and fat shamed as the Duchess of Pork due to her constant battle with the bulge and the latter christened Princess Pushy because of her overbearing persona. Both royals were torn apart by the media and both were white as driven snow.  

Accusing people of racism when they are not is bad enough but accusing an entire nation is a serious smear and an insult that should not go unchallenged.

Stirring up animosity and hatred toward white people by accusing them of racism, together with white supremacy and white privilege, is one of the foundations of the ‘woke’ culture and shame on Harry for embracing it at the behest of his brainwashed Hollywood wife.

One would think that Harry and Meghan would be the last people to be accusing others of privilege when one was part of the most elite family on the planet and the other an exclusively educated and pampered member of the Hollywood elite.

To conclude; it is worth noting that despite their abhorrence of white people, white supremacy and white privilege, Harry and Meghan have chosen to retire to white majority Canada instead of her ancestral home in black majority Nigeria where they would be spared touching shoulders with the people they despise so much.

Related articles:


Delingpole: #Megxit! Ex-Prince Harry Got Woke, Now He's Broke.


Kensington staff tells about Meghan tells about Meghan and Harry's time at the palace.


Prince Harry claims people are racist without even knowing it.

Anti-White Project 1619. Rewriting American History

Propaganda and rewriting history have been essential weapons in the armory of tyrants down the ages as they attempt to demonize and delegitimize the regime they are endeavoring to overthrow as well as giving legitimacy to their own.

One would think that in today’s western democracies enlightened people would see this crude weapon for what it is and ignore it. This in turn might encourage the power brokers and their propagandists to refrain from insulting the people’s intelligence with their attempted forgery, but unfortunately this is not the case.

With their Project 1619, The New York Times has embarked on a propaganda campaign to rewrite history in true Pol Pot fashion. In their history-perverting minds, Year Zero in America was August 1619 with the arrival of the first slaves from Africa.

According to them it was on this date that the ‘true’ founding of America began. Shamefully, and with malice aforethought, Project 1619 is planned to be added to the school curriculum with the malign intention of brainwashing children with phony history. 

This false narrative not only ignores or downplays the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492 but also the arrival of the Paleo-Indians who arrived from Siberia around 10,000 BC.

According to the NYT, this crude attempt at rewriting history “places the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story that we tell ourselves about who we are”.

They want to make slavery the central issue in the entire history of the United States, but they ignore the part played by Irish, Asian and other non-African slaves whose contribution to the building of modern America was much more significant than that of plantation workers.

As bonded laborers Irish, Chinese and press ganged British paupers, along with other non-Africans, built the trans-continental railways as well as working on the tobacco and cotton plantations alongside the slaves from Africa. (See here)

This rewriting of history by the NYT is part of the ongoing and escalating war against white Americans where they are being demonized in the mainstream media and on the Democratic Party primary election campaign trail.

They are also attempting to deny the fact that it was European settlers and their descendants that founded the Republic and were the driving force that built the America we see today.

This perversion of true history is being perpetrated by the ideologically driven, left wing establishment as part of their long planned ‘fundamental transformation’ of America. As we recall, this was a campaign soundbite of that pretender to the crown, Barry Soetoro, known to the world as Barack Obama.

This articulate, telegenic, mixed-race speech reader with no history and a manufactured background was the front man for the deep state who have ramped up their anti-white rhetoric to hysterical levels since the election of President Trump.

Their ongoing project to transform America into a socialist state has been halted and put into reverse by the election of President Trump; this has forced them into evermore desperate measures which include the demonizing and denunciation of white people and the capitalist America they have created.

This demonizing and denunciation of white people is accompanied by accusations of white privilege, white supremacy, white nationalism and institutional racism which is used to delegitimize the very foundation and existence of America.       

The truth is that America was founded by white European settlers which included Christians fleeing religious persecution at home; the greatness and wealth of the country we see today is the result of the initiative, innovation, sacrifice, and pioneering spirit of those same white European settlers and their descendants.

What the NYT propaganda deliberately ignores is the fact that slavery was abolished in 1865 after some 620,000 mainly white people died in one of the bloodiest civil wars in history. Combined with the civil rights laws of the 1960’s the American dream became available to all citizens regardless of skin color or the country of origin of their ancestors.

For the Democrats and the deep state to achieve their socialist dream it is imperative that black people retain their victim status and the plantation mentality along with their animosity toward white people regardless of whether they are the actual descendents of slaves, or Africans who arrived voluntarily as migrants seeking a better life.

The call for reparations by the Democratic candidates is deliberately designed to appeal to their anti-white, anti-American base and to stoke up interracial tensions even further.

Such is their hatred of capitalist America and its white history, it would suit their purposes to ignite a race war which they hope would result in its downfall after which they could build their beloved socialist state out of the wreckage.

Judging by the demographics of gun ownership this would be a massive miscalculation with grave consequences for themselves and their socialist dream.   

For the benefit of the NYT, along with its readers and the rest of the world, the history of Africans in America covers a mere four hundred years while that of the Europeans is five hundred and twenty-seven years and that of the Paleo-Indians and their modern descendants some twelve thousand years.

The NYT Project 1619 is just another attempt by socialists and their fellow travelers to rewrite history in order to precipitate the downfall of capitalist America and the descendants of the white Europeans responsible for its founding.

The Truth About White Slavery and The Myth of White Supremacy

David Lammy, the Member of Parliament for the London ghetto of Tottenham, is a vile racist who is totally obsessed with skin colour. He uses his black privilege and the two-tier criminal justice system to make pejorative, anti-white statements about the British people knowing he can get away with it without sanction.

He has incited violence against white people who cannot respond in kind because of his black privilege and the immunity given to him by the two-tier criminal justice system. The once respected protectors of law and order are now dedicated to imposing a politically correct agenda on behalf of the state. This includes shutting down any criticism of Lammy and his supporters with threats of prosecution and even imprisonment.

The following article will be considered as provocative and racist, but it is the truth and an indictment of the police, the media, political establishment and everyone else who allow Lammy to get away with hate speech and incitement to violence without sanction. It is also a challenge to these same people to stop pandering to racists like Lammy by returning the justice system to equality under law and treating Lammy as they would any other racist:

                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s not surprising when black politicians use their skin color to endear themselves to their black constituents in order to get re-elected and remain aboard the gravy train. At a time when false narratives, fake news and outright lying are employed by politicians in their election campaigns they are employing what they consider to be an acceptable practice.  

What is unforgivable and downright evil is for these black politicians to stir up racial hatred and violence against white people by claiming to be the victims of the long-abolished slave trade. Their outrageously false claim is that the legacy of slavery has perpetuated their victimhood which is manifested today by so-called white supremacy and white privilege of the host population.

Due to the rewriting of history, slavery is falsely portrayed as being exclusively perpetrated by white people forcibly removing black people from Africa to labour on the farms and plantations of America and the colonies.

Actual history has shown us that slavery is not exclusively white on black but endemic across the planet down the ages including the victors in war enslaving the vanquished. The Egyptians and Babylonians enslaved the Israelites, the Romans enslaved the British, the Turks enslaved the Greeks and so on and so forth.

More recently, the Nazi's enslaved the Jews and other unfavoured ethnic groups in purpose made concentration/extermination camps.

Even Africans were enslaving other Africans and selling them to Arabs and other slave traders prior to the arrival of Europeans. Slavery is still legal in many Islamic countries and in some other countries in the developing world to this day. 

The existence of white slaves and indentured labourers that could also be bought and sold in the slave markets is studiously ignored by Lammy and his ilk. Also ignored is the transportation to the colonies of debtors, petty criminals and those considered to be ‘undesirables’ to be used as slave labour by the British ruling class of the day.

Black politicians and their anti-white supporters also never mention the workhouses and debtors’ prisons that were nothing less than institutions of white slavery that persisted long after the slave trade was abolished in Great Britain and the colonies.

These black politicians are well aware that institutional white slavery existed, but they deliberately ignore it because it doesn’t fit with their white imposed victimhood narrative. They totally ignore the barons and serfdom which was white slavery that endured in Great Britain for centuries.

No student of British history could possibly argue that conditions in the coal mines, iron works and fabric mills during the British industrial revolution were infinitely worse than the cotton fields and sugar plantations of America and the colonies.

The same can be said for housing where the working classes lived in the most appalling vermin infested slums with little or no amenities as opposed to a wooden cabin on a plantation albeit a rudimentary structure.

The industry owners of the day were no better than slave masters who used the truck system of remuneration along with debt to keep their workers enslaved to their factories, coal mines, mills and foundries and wages at starvation levels.

It must be remembered that women and children also worked in the same appalling conditions in coal mines, iron works, mills and factories for long hours earning nothing more than a pittance. It was said at the time that the owners gave their employees just enough so that they would reproduce and supply another generation of cheap, enslaved workers. 

The continual verbal abuse of white British citizens by David Lammy MP and his fellow ingrates is not just divisive but it is stirring up racial hatred using rewritten history which makes it infinitely worse.

His constant accusations of white supremacy and white privilege needs to be countered before it becomes accepted as the established truth which will relegate the actual truth to the status of myth.

Lammy is a Labour MP so he should at least know something of the history of the British working class and the folklore of the Labour Movement he claims to represent. It is a history of deprivation, sacrifice and bloodshed exclusively suffered by the ancestors of the white people he now gratuitously insults.

In the Great Britain he hates because of the slave trade he should at least acknowledge the lengths the people went to in order to abolish it. This began with Somerset v Stewart in 1772 when slavery was proved to be unsupported in British law.

White people went on to abolish slavery by passing the Slave Trade Act in 1807 and led by abolitionist, William Wilberforce, white people abolished slavery once and for across the empire by passing the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833.

In addition to these legislative efforts, mill workers used their white privilege to get killed in the Peterloo massacre of 1819 while agitating for Parliamentary reform.

In the Merthyr Rising of 1831 white people rose up in insurrection after the Iron Masters refused to alleviate the appalling deprivation being suffered by the iron workers and coal miners. To set an example to the working class, coal miners leader, Richard Lewis, was falsely accused of stabbing a soldier and subsequently hanged. 

The white leaders of the Tollpuddle Martyrs were transported to the prison colony in Australia in 1834 for trying to form a trade union.

During the Chartist Uprising in Newport in 1839 white working-class people were massacred while agitating for Parliamentary reform. The leaders were sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered. Fortunately, the sentence was commuted to transportation to the prison colony in Australia.

The Jarrow Crusade in 1936 saw members of the working-class communities use their white privilege to march from Jarrow in the north of England to London in order to present a petition to Parliament protesting unemployment and poverty.

The freedoms and relative prosperity enjoyed by the British people today was won by the blood and sacrifice of a population that endured poverty and conditions that were worse than any plantation worker.

David Lammy’s parents took advantage of this sacrifice and voluntarily left their sun kissed Caribbean paradise to make their way to a cold, wet and windswept island in the north Atlantic with a ninety percent white population.

This is the same island and population that their son claims are racists and white supremacists whose sole mission in life is to use their white privilege to oppress Mr. Lammy and the black community presumably to make their lives intolerable.

Mr. Lammy was so oppressed and discriminated against by the white people of Great Britain that he availed himself of a first-class education. He was awarded a scholarship at the of age ten to attend a prestigious school founded by Henry VIII. He went on to study law at the University of London Law School and then to Harvard University in racist America. He was called to the bar at Lincolns Inn and practiced as a Barrister before becoming a Member of Parliament.

Not too bad for a country he claims uses institutional racism and intolerance to discriminate against black people to keep them confined to menial jobs in the ghetto.

According to the 2011 census, white British comprise 87.1% of the population so it’s obvious that they will be the dominant ethnic group and their way of life will take precedent over that of more recent arrivals. Black British comprise 3.0%, Indian British 2.3% and Chinese British 0.7%.

It is noticeable that the Indian and Chinese British communities combined also comprise 3% of the population but they don’t insult and smear the white British people despite being shipped to all corners of the empire like the Africans were.

It could be that the Indian and Chinese British are industrious, entrepreneurial, self-supporting, family orientated communities who take advantage of the opportunities Great Britain has to offer as opposed to wallowing in victimhood from a long-gone era while blaming white people and demanding reparations.

Looking at the state of the African nations that sold their fellow countrymen to the slave traders, David Lammy should be grateful that his ancestors were shipped to the colonies because he may not be the successful wealthy man he is today, he may not even have existed at all.

It is the view of many that his ancestors were not so much stolen from Africa but rescued. No one denies they suffered hardship but no worse than the ancestors of British white working class who were not responsible for slavery.  

The British people have no white privilege and they are not white supremacists. To insult and smear them as if they are white supremacists who were responsible for slavery serves only to stir up division and hatred which will not benefit his community, or any other community, should it descend into inter-communal animosity and violence.

I will conclude with the words of the great Mohammad Ali when asked about what he thought about Africa after he spent some time there preparing for his rumble in the jungle with George Foreman

“I’m glad my granddaddy got on that boat”.

Amen to that.


                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------


Previous and associated articles:


Labours' David Lammy 'fakes' race hate letters.


David Lammy - Black Privilege, White Hatred and Immunity.

United Nations – Are Brexit Voting Brits More Racist Than Ever?

Why civilized nations continue to give credibility, along with billions of taxpayer dollars, to an organization that is flawed beyond repair and openly hostile to civilized nations defies logic. The United Nations has been taken over by an organized collection of third world dictators, communists, anti-Semites and anti-development globalists who harbor a hatred for the United States, Great Britain and Israel.

The latest imbecility emanating from this epicenter of globalist world government is to send a special envoy to Great Britain to report on racism, discrimination and exclusion since the British people voted to regain their independence and sovereignty from the corrupt European Union (EU).

Zambian-born, Zimbabwe raised American academic, Tendayi Achiume, the UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance follows on the heels of other bureaucrats sent to Great Britain to denigrate and insult its people.

UN advisor for Forced Evictions, Professor Yves Cabannes, claimed that a local authority in Essex, England had abused the human rights of four hundred travelers who were being evicted after illegally occupying private land.

Two years after this malicious political agitation, the UN sent a creature named Raquel Rolnick, their Housing rapporteur to lecture the British people on behalf of housing victims. The obviously demented Ms. Rolnick is a Brazilian academic and devotee of Karl Marx who went on to criticize the British housing benefits system while staying in a $420 a night hotel.

Ms. Rolnik was followed by South African feminist Rashida Mandoo, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women who, despite having a female Prime Minister and Head of State, concluded that Great Britain was a ‘boys club with a sexist culture'.

The campaign of insult and degradation continued with the recent arrival of yet another special rapporteur, Canadian Leilani Farha who claimed that Great Britain has a ‘troubling attitude’ to social housing.

What these UN special advisers and rapporteurs deliberately ignore is that Great Britain is a small island that has increased its population by eight million in the last twenty-five years, over two million in the last five years alone. Due to the governments' refusal to implement proper in/out checks at ports of entry and exit, these figures do not include one or possibly two million that have entered illegally and live below the radar.

These numbers are far more than can possibly be housed, educated and provided for by government and local social services.

More critical is that millions of these new arrivals are from the undeveloped world that have cultures and practices that are totally alien and who cannot or will not integrate or accept the traditions of the host nation.

By ignorance or design these UN special advisers and rapporteurs do not acknowledge that millions of these new colonist’s demand and agitate for the host people to alter their ancient traditions and way of life to accommodate them and their traditions.

The situation is made infinitely worse by the government and its agents refusing to act when the new colonists indulge in an orgy of violent crime, including robbery, rape and murder, on the grounds of ‘cultural sensitivity’.

Such is their determination to impose their agenda the government is resorting to tyranny by denying the British people their ancient right of free speech and by closing down any form protest or redress. The fact is that the government is stuffed full of compliant placemen and UN apparatchiks that believe in the UN’s globalist project and are determined to implement it no matter what the cost.

It is this forced transformation along with government resorting to despotism to impose it that is causing inter-communal friction, not racism, xenophobia, Islamophobia or any other label made up by UN bureaucrats and globalists to smear and denigrate the British people and those who disagree with their agenda.

In conclusion, it’s worth reminding the UN bureaucrats that despite the gloomy scenario they want to paint along with the insults and denigration aimed at the British people, the Westminster Parliament is the most diverse in history with an increase in representation of ethnic minorities, women, gays and those with disabilities.

There is a female Head of State, Prime Minister, and Leader of the House, there is a Muslim Home Secretary, a Muslim Mayor of London, etc. White British are a minority in four of Great Britain’s major towns and cities including London, the capital.

In the meantime, ignored by the UN special advisers and rapporteurs, in Southern Africa racism and xenophobic violence perpetrated by black people is running rampant. (See here)

Related articles:

UN sends envoy to Britain to probe whether Brexit made the country more racist.

Yves Cabannes is a poster-boy for the charade that is the UN

Achiume Named to UN post on racism and intolerance (Biography)

Whoopi Goldberg - She's Leaving Home Bye Bye

When actress, comedienne and television host, Whoopi Goldberg, informed the world of her intention to leave the USA should Donald Trump become President she joined a long line of multi-millionaire celebrities who have made similar threats in the past.

In all these cases 'threat' is the operative word because it gives the impression that the user is taking a principled stand and this in turn can have a short term positive impact on their image. In reality threatening is the easy part, it's following through by packing their bags, going to the airport then getting on a plane and actually leaving the country that will ultimately define their long term image.

Wealthy celebrities threatening to leave the very country that gave them the opportunity to build personal fortunes, which most of their compatriots can only dream about, displays a level of loathing for America and ingratitude that is more than shameful, it's hypocrisy writ large.

It must be said that many of these celebrities may have been blessed with acting or singing skills but were short changed when it comes to an Intelligence Quotient high enough to realise their own imbecility.

Fellow actress and comedienne Raven-Simone has vowed to leave the USA for Canada "if a Republican is nominated" obviously ignorant of the fact that in a Presidential election a Republican is always nominated along with a Democrat and any Independent that fancies their chances.

Morose rapper Kanye West threatens to leave America on a regular basis apparently because of racism; this is despite the fact that, according to himself, he is comparable with Jesus Christ and further more can only be judged by God. With such a divine status and connections it's a mystery how his grievances aren't fixed from on high.

It would be helpful if his holiness Kanye West could explain if America is such a racist country why are Africans risking life and limb crossing deserts and oceans to get there.

(See previous Kanye West article here)

Apart from Raven-Simone, neither Whoopi Goldberg nor Kanye West has given any indication of their preferred destination; there is however another actor comedian, Eddie Griffin, who has chosen Africa as his preferred place of exile from Donald Trump.

Since Africa is such a massive continent containing some 54 independent countries it would help if he could be more specific and narrow it down to a single country. There's plenty to choose from including those bordering the Mediterranean Sea in the north, those bordering the Atlantic in the west or those bordering the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea in the east.

Alternatively he could choose one from the interior such as Congo, South Sudan, Rwanda or Burundi. There is of course the home away from home, Liberia - translated means "Land of the free" - which was home to freed American slaves and modeled on the USA. The capital city, Monrovia, is named after President James Monroe.

Like most post independence African countries Liberia is wracked with corruption, tribalism, civil war and abject poverty. Since these post independence countries were left with viable industries, infrastructure and all the accomplishments of European development the blame lies solely with black Africans and not the white man.

Actor Samuel L. Jackson has decided to head off to South Africa, the Rainbow Nation, for his post Trump exile but I fear he's in for a shock when he alights from his airplane at Johannesburg airport or wherever. If he thinks it's all Nelson Mandela constructed peace, love and brotherhood he'll be wrong.

Since the white people that Jackson hates so much were removed from power the country has been mired in corruption, tribalism, poverty and violent crime that would make South Chicago look like Disneyland.

Hatred of foreigners, including Americans, is now the hallmark of the Rainbow Nation where the term 'xenophobic violence' has joined the lexicon of terms for brutality in South Africa.

Despite claiming African identities I would hazard a guess that Whoopi Goldberg, worth an estimated $45 million, Kanye West, despite pleading poverty, reputed to be worth around $145million along with Samuel L. Jackson, a paltry $170 million, wouldn't last a week living anywhere in Africa despite the fact that white privilege and it's supposed associated racism are long gone.

In African countries the wealth and living standards that our celebrities enjoy in America are dependent upon ones tribe which is nothing other than black privilege. Tribal animosity accompanied by inter-tribal violence is Africa's very own black on black version of racism.

It's odds on that should these America loathing, wealthy celebrities choose exile in any part of their ancestral home they'll regret it within a week and be sheepishly making their way with all possible haste back to the Good ol' USA, Donald Trump and all.    



 

Kanye West Leaving Racist America While African Immigrants Excel

Listening to the outpouring of bile by the African-American celebrity community one would be forgiven for thinking that the USA is populated by a pitiless elite of white despots who's only pleasure in life is keeping their saintly black victims in a permanent state of servitude based purely on skin colour.

Listening to the leaders and icons of the African-American community one would also be forgiven for thinking that nobody with a non-white skin has ever risen above the level peasant let alone possess more than two cents to rub together.

The evil purveyors of these falsehoods are not short of a buck or two themselves and have a vested interest in prolonging the myth of victimhood that is holding back the black communities and causing such appalling misery, violence and death.

They ignore the fact that African-Americans have held the highest offices in the land including Secretary of State, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Attorney General, Supreme Court Justice, State Governors, Congressmen of both House and Senate, not to mention President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

African-Americans comprise some of the richest people in the USA and are represented in all walks of life including Wall Street, Industry, Sport, Media, and Entertainment.

One among this number is Kanye West who is not only a highly successful, wealthy African-American he is also an icon of the black community but who continually puts down the country that facilitated his success.

For those who enjoy Kanye West's type of entertainment he is obviously a very talented individual and he must be an astute businessman to hold on to his accumulated wealth. It must be understood however that his middle class upbringing and subsequent wealthy lifestyle prohibits him from claiming the victim status that is promoted by the black vested interests that seek to prolong it.

No sensible person can deny that racism exists and that includes the black on white racism of vile organisations such as the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam who's mission is to undo the advances in civil rights and return America to the era of segregation.

If the anti-American rhetoric of the race baiters and self loathers like Kanye West were to be believed then America is rife with black oppression where opportunity is denied to black people who are confined to ghettos of poverty and violent crime.

Apparently racism is so bad in America that Kanye West has threatened to uproot his family and leave for a more accommodating environment. Where this Utopia is remains a mystery as is his wife's view on her re-location. There can't be many places on the planet where a lady with little acknowledged talent can make millions simply by being an old acquaintance of hotel heiress Paris Hilton.

If Kanye West is to be believed then no African migrant in his right mind would risk leaving their homeland to embark on a life threatening journey to the New World only to end up as a gang banger, high on drugs in a black ghetto with his pants hanging down below his a*se while being oppressed by the evil white man.

The reality is somewhat different to the false impression given by Kanye West and the race baiters who have, after all, got a living to make.

Despite the attempts to downgrade America by the Obama administration, along with every self loathing socialist, multi-millionaire celebrity and hand wringing, bleeding heart liberal - in other words those that go around calling themselves 'progressives' - it remains the land of opportunity where the American dream still lives for those who ignore the likes of Kanye West and his affluent ilk and have the determination to succeed.

Let me introduce Harold Ekeh, an immigrant from Nigeria who overcame adversity, worked hard like his parents and has been accepted by all eight Ivy League schools.

Victor Agbafi the son of Nigerian immigrants has also been accepted by Ivy League schools, as have Munira Khalif of Somalian parentage, Kwasi Enin of Ghana parentage and Stefan Stoykov of Bulgarian parentage. All are first generation immigrants who ignored the likes of Kanye West, took advantage of the opportunity afforded to them and achieved the American dream.

I would suggest that those who indulge in the ghetto gangsta culture choose new leaders and stop listening to the race hate rhetoric of the race hustlers and losers and listen instead to winners like Harold, Victor, Munira, Kwasi and Stefan.

I would also suggest that Kanye West is an ingrate and hypocrite of the very highest order who doesn't deserve the opportunity he has been afforded by the United States of America. Perhaps he should re-locate his family to Nigeria, Somalia or Ghana where he would be among his own and where racism, in theory, doesn't exist.



 

Racism, Bigotry And The 'Far Right' Are Acceptable When Chasing Votes

One of the most publicised incidents during the last British general election campaign was the labeling of Rochdale resident Gillian Duffy as "a bigoted woman" for having the temerity to mention immigration to the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

(Bigot story here)

The fact that Ms Duffy and her family were long time supporters of the Labour Party was of no consequence to the Brown or his Party, she had mentioned immigration with a negative connotation and was punished in accordance with the party's calculated tactic of demonisation and smear.

Rochdale is one of the multitude of close knit, post industrial towns in England that prides itself on close family and community ties. It is also one of the multitude of towns that has been disfigured beyond recognition by the Labour's Party's policy of cultural replacement using open border mass immigration. 

The Labour Party had long planned their covert cultural replacement agenda and knew that it would face fierce opposition once the horrific repercussions started to become apparent. Equality and hate crime laws were the main battering ram they used to bow the people into submission, along with a rigidly policed policy of political correctness.

Central to these policies, and to further back up the anti-British tactic of closing down debate, was the routine use of smear and demonisation. The Labour Party turned this into a fine art with a full time Smear Unit located at the heart of Brown's government in No 10 Downing Street. 

Anyone making a statement that was remotely critical of their immigration policy or made any reference to race, religion, ethnicity, no matter how innocuous, was seized upon by Labour's race zealots and met with insults, demonisation and smear. 

Insults such as racist, bigot, xenophobe and 'far right' were thrown around with abandon regardless of whether they were appropriate or not. The idea was to shame opponents into silence closing down any debate in the process. 

Despite promises to the contrary, it became apparent after they took office that the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition shared the same cultural replacement agenda of their predecessors. They also had no intention of dealing with open border mass immigration, political correctness or the policy of smearing anyone who questioned the agenda.

The coalition added to the armoury of insults by labelling people and groups who questioned open border mass immigration as 'far right'. The main proponent of this particular smear was none other than David Cameron's token Muslim woman cabinet member, the Baroness Warsi.

As an untalented, over promoted token appointment, the noble Baroness's attempts at linking opponents of mass immigration to more unsavoury elements was amateurish to the point of embarrassing. Prior to her resignation over her support for the terrorist group Hamas, she was in the habit of labeling any critic of mass immigration as 'far right'.

To say that the political class's mass immigration policy has been a complete and utter disaster would not only be the understatement of the century, it is also their declaration of war against the British people.

The British people didn't ask for this, they weren't consulted, they don't want it and it was never put in any election manifesto. The ruling political class, under orders from the global 'progressive' elite, were going to impose a so called  'multi-cultural society' regardless.

Consequently, villages, towns and vast areas of Great Britain's major cities are unrecognisable. Welfare financed, crime ridden, mono-cultural ghettos infest British cities with some operating under sharia law and consequently out of bounds for British citizens including the police.

With the connivance and approval of the political establishment and the local authorities, including the police, social services, care homes, schools and the media, the rape and sexual abuse of thousands of under age white girls by Muslim men was allowed continue.

(Rochdale Child abuse story here)

In addition to the increased competition for jobs, Great Britain's taxpayer funded social services including, education, health and housing have been put under intolerable strain by the unsustainable increase in the population.

Although they are yet to fully re-discover the bulldog spirit that defeated Hitler and the National Socialists, the British people are slowly awakening from their media induced slumber and fighting back against a patronising and malignant political class.

The phenomenon known as the United Kingdom Independent Party, usually referred to as UKIP or the People's Army, have been growing in influence for some years, taking support from the old legacy parties together with non-aligned and independent voters.

Their prime objective is getting Great Britain out of the European Union, regaining control over the borders, economic sanity via balanced budgets and most notably putting the interests of the British people above all others.

As a measure of their rising support they recently won the European elections, vastly increased their numbers of local councillors and won their first Member of the Westminster Parliament in a byelection. Their momentum has put the fear of God into the current political establishment who up until recently variously described them, among other things, as fascists, 'far right', xenophobes, little Englanders etc. 

The current Prime Minister David Cameron famously referred to UKIP supporters as "loonies, fruitcakes and closet racists".

The meteoric rise in support for UKIP and the corresponding fall in support for the legacy parties has heralded a change in the usual political discourse and in particular a change in language.

Not only are the policies and lexicon of UKIP no longer attracting the usual smears of racist, bigot and 'far right', they are actively being adopted by the three legacy parties.

The Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron spotted the threat earlier and has been making false promises for some time about border control, access to welfare for immigrants, deportation of foreign criminals and whole raft of measures he knows the EU bureaucrats will forbid him to action.

The rise of UKIP is heralding the end for Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and his ludicrously named Liberal Democrat Party. If ever there was a party of loonies and fruitcakes this collection of weirdos is it; to make the list of names more accurate we can add sex pests, fornicators, perverts and paedophiles. 

In a desperate attempt to ward off oblivion Clegg has softened his previously solid anti-British pro-immigrant stance and is talking in terms that would have attracted smears from him had they been spoken by a UKIP representative.

It has long been accepted that Cameron and Clegg are in total thrall to the EU bureaucrats and are prepared to lie, deceive, obfuscate and make any false promise to implement their masters agenda. It is the utter hypocrisy of the Labour Party that really beggars belief.

This is the party that has been most dedicated to the cultural replacement agenda and the most prolific in the use of insult, demonisation and smear to denigrate opponents. The Labour Party has an even uglier side it is wont to employ in order to intimidate its opponents. They call themselves Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and they violently disrupt UKIP activities hurling insults such as 'racist' and 'fascist' with abandon.

Supposedly independent of the Labour Party, UAF are in fact their unwashed, post-pubescent street activists who enjoy a bit slogan shouting, banner waving and aggravation. They enjoy pretend revolution along with bayonets and barricades rhetoric and a cup of hot chocolate from their mothers before bedtime.

(Labour and UAF here)

Labour Party leader Ed Miliband together with his second-in-command Harriet Harman and his Shadow Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper-Balls, are all stealing UKIP's clothes and talking the same UKIP language that attracted insults from them less than a week ago.

(Miliband hypocrisy here)

Harman hypocrisy here)

(Yvette Cooper hypocrisy here)

Yesterdays insults are no longer applicable when the ruling class want to use the same policies and arguments to steal the votes of the people they previously dismissed as racists and bigots. 

This kind of  cynical behavior and breathtaking hypocrisy is utterly disgraceful and serves as a clear demonstration of the abysmal standard of politician that has lied and spun their way into office. It is hoped that the rise of UKIP will consign these charlatans to the dustbin of history where they so rightly belong.   

       

New Battle Of Britain - EU Federalists Claim British People Are More Racist Today

The long planned tactic of the government-media complex to preserve the political establishment's hegemony over the British people is to accuse anyone who questions their cultural replacement agenda of racism.

This organised campaign of vilification and smear against opponents of open border mass immigration was never more apparent than during the recent EU election campaign.  UKIP, the party now referred to as the Peoples Party, was the main target of this campaign with its leader Nigel Farage subjected to a particularly nasty campaign of smear and abuse.

One would think that with the election over and the triumph of UKIP over the old established order, they would pause, take stock and analyse the effectiveness of their campaign. If so they would come to the same conclusion as everyone else, that their tactic of ignoring the issues but smearing their opponents instead only served to harden support for UKIP.  More importantly their overuse of the 'racist' tag rendered it ineffective.

With the publication of a NatCen British Social Attitudes survey it's obvious that the 'racist' smear will continue to be the weapon of choice against UKIP, Nigel Farage and anyone who has the temerity to question the cultural replacement or the open border mass immigration agenda of the old political order.

It's worth noting at this point that the old political order not only includes the three leaders of the legacy parties, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Red Ed Miliband, but past luminaries such as former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the first family of troughing, Neil and Glenys Kinnock together with the recently resurrected Tony Blair.

Many observers around the world will be wondering if the British people will display their gratitude to Blair for sacrificing some of his valuable money making time to bless them with the benefit of his undoubted wisdom. (See yesterdays post)

The survey itself, which was most likely commissioned by the government-media complex, is a continuation of the 'racist' theme which will make up the core tactic of their campaign into the next years general election.

According to the survey, racist attitudes in Great Britain have risen to one third from one quarter since the millennium when, apparently, there was little prejudice against people of other races.

Unsurprisingly, the worse culprits are:

a) male.

b) the over 55's.

c) the least educated.

d) manual workers.

e) people in the West Midlands

f) Conservative voters.

Without access to the questions or the ethnic makeup of the participants, this breakdown could be interpreted  as an attempt to demonise by association.

Another point that makes this survey appear suspicious is the reasons they give for the increase in racist behavior.

The survey concludes that: 

"the marked turning around in the figures suggested that this change could be linked to the impact of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 in the USA. Or with people feeling concerned about the impact of immigration in their area".

This statement, suggesting that the British people are more racist today because of 9/11 is risible, but by putting UKIP in the same sentence as the openly racist British National Party (BNP), it exposes the survey as nothing more than an unsubtle piece of establishment propaganda.

The offending sentence reads:

"The last decade has seen the rise of the BNP and UKIP which could explain part of the increase".

So there we have it the rise of UKIP explains the rise of racism in Great Britain.

The term 'racist' is applied to anyone who questions the old establishment agenda of cultural replacement and open border mass immigration and therefore it is no longer considered an insult, especially if it is used in the course of an election campaign by people who have lost the debate on the issues.

The majority of the indigenous British people are not hate filled racists who despise foreigners because they are xenophobes. They are honest, decent people who love their country and don't want it to see their way of life destroyed or their values trashed by unscrupulous, unprincipled self serving charlatans like Tony Blair, David Cameron, Nick Clegg or Red Ed Miliband.

I would add that the British people are concerned about mass immigration not because of malice or racism but because of fear that if nothing is done then the disaster that has been visited upon their fellow citizens in the following stories will be visited upon them and their children some time in the future:

Great Britain is now the United Nations of Crime with criminals from 160 countries filling our jails. One in seven inmates are foreigners and they include murderers, rapists, burglars, paedophiles drug dealers etc.

Immigrant Crime rate soars with prisons full of foreign criminals.

750 criminals including, killers, rapists, violent robber and drug dealers are on run after being released or absconding because they cannot be deported on orders from the EU.

Taxpayers pay 25 million pounds to keep 850 prisoners in jail after their sentences have been served because they are too dangerous to release and the EU will not allow their deportation.

The police are investigating 54 Muslim paedophile gangs across England and Wales.

Rochdale Muslim paedophile gang that preyed on underage white girls are jailed for 77 years.

Rotherham Asian paedophile gang jailed for 32 years.

And so on and so forth.

In conclusion I would add that the people who advocate open border mass immigration never have to suffer the consequences of what they impose on others.

Furthermore it is outrageous that multi-millionaire socialist Tony Blair, the self described "straight kinda guy", the owner of ten houses, including a country mansion, to accuse people who have paid a heavy price for his policies, of racism.

 

    

American Prosperity And African Poverty - Reality Ignored By Black Racists

Anyone who has had the privilege of travelling in sub Saharan Africa cannot fail to have noticed how lush the countryside is owing mainly to the high fertility of the rich, red volcanic soils. What travelers cannot see are the continents other abundant riches consisting of minerals, petro-chemicals, diamonds and other economically viable resources.

Similarly blessed with the same abundant resources is the American continent but in order to illustrate the point, the comparison will be limited to the United States.

After the discovery of the fossil skeleton named Lucy, experts announced that this was the first upright walking humanoid and estimated that it inhabited Africa some 3.2 million years ago.

Archaeologists suggest that the USA was first colonized by Paeleo-Indians who crossed the Bering Land Bridge from East Asia into what is now Alaska, anywhere between forty thousand and seventeen thousand years ago and migrated southward.

Both Lucy and the Paeleo-Indians (who were originally descended from Lucy) didn't evolve past the hunter gatherer stage until the arrival of the Europeans in the 15th century for America, and as late as the 19th century for Africa.

The exploitation of these resources and the resultant astronomical increase in prosperity, civilization and quality of life across Africa and the USA did not begin until the arrival of the Europeans.

Its worth reiterating that despite the God given riches, Africa and America were two continents populated by desperately poor, uncivilized, warring tribes, who suffered starvation, disease and abysmally low life expectancy for millions of years until the arrival of the Europeans.

Before I advance any further, I understand the argument that these people would have been better off if the Europeans had left them alone. This is the most juvenile nonsense and is being advanced by a motley collection of hippies, white middle class hand wringers, bleeding hearts, self loathers, the foreign aid industry and a horde of publicity seeking celebrity millionaires who are polishing their humanitarian credentials in order to swell their already bloated coffers and finance their hypocrisy.

They believe that without European colonization these tribes would be living happy peaceful lives to this day; living in harmony with Mother Earth taking only what they need. These people are seriously deluded. If the Europeans hadn't arrived then the Russians, Japanese, Chinese or Nazi's surely would have and if so there wouldn't be a native alive anywhere between Cairo and Cape Town or between Wasilla and Washington DC.

To continue: It only took the American people four hundred years to become the most prosperous people on the planet, with the greatest jump in prosperity coming in the last two hundred years. Similarly, the riches of Africa were released with a massive increase in wealth during the last one hundred and thirty years.

It would be foolish at this point to deny that abuses were perpetrated by the colonists on both continents, however this should be regarded as an unfortunate part of civilisation's evolution, a kind of historical learning curve.

The attitudes widely held back then have been largely eradicated by the descendants of the Europeans and anyone in America, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion or skin colour can take part in the American dream if they choose to do so. Alternatively they can choose not to do so and blame the white man for their condition or the mythical "lingering legacy of slavery."

After billions of years of laying untouched in the ground and after 3.2 million years of humanoid habitation and evolution, the wealth of Africa was finally exploited and released by the Europeans. This advance of civilisation was unacceptable to the new breed of 'progressives' infesting the United Nations and as a consequence the Europeans were blackmailed and bullied into to handing everything over to the Africans.

The results are there for all to see: on a continent blessed with abundant riches of all kinds.  Poverty, starvation, disease, violent crime, low life expectancy etc. have all returned, and we can add to this black on black racism.

It must be remembered that the hard work had already been done by the Europeans. Armed only with their self belief, work ethic and a desire for a better life, they took an untouched continent, developed it and released its riches.

When the Africans took over, the technology was developed, the infrastructure was in place, the wealth was already created, all they had to do was continue running the government and the industries.

After half a century of self rule and with countless billions in aid from countries with far less human and natural resources, African run Africa is a total disaster and a blight on humanity. This sad situation cannot be blamed on Europeans or the white man or the "lingering legacy of Colonialism." The black African is solely to blame, they had it all and they threw it away, they are the authors of their own misfortune.

The evolution of modern America is a similar story, but in addition to self belief, work ethic and a desire for a better life, the American people were armed with a 4487 word Constitution which guaranteed individual liberty, free enterprise and limited government.

In only two hundred years a handful of people from thirteen colonies created the biggest economy on the planet, they created more prosperity for more people in all human history.

The divisively named 'African'-Americans have been free to participate for over one hundred and fifty of those two hundred years and yet millions remain in so called poverty and continue to blame their condition on the white man or the same mythical "lingering legacy of slavery."

People are, by and large, afraid to discuss the reasons for black so called poverty for fear of being smeared by the cultural Marxists who infest the American political class and media.  As a result the myths and falsehoods are allowed to perpetuate and go unchallenged.

No such fear inhabits this site so the truth can be written and stuff the consequences. Publish and be damned is the order of the day.

So called black poverty in America is the sole responsibility of the black people themselves, combined with the cynical manipulation by vile black racists who have a vested interest in keeping the hate and divisiveness going.

Apart from the usual race baiters such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the increasingly demented Louis Farrakhan, the leading protagonists for stirring up racial hatred and its resultant 'poverty' are household names who should be ashamed of themselves. Oprah Winfrey, Attorney General Eric Holder, Barry Obama and his bitter and twisted wife, Michelle.

Looking closer at their public appearances and pronouncements one can see their contempt and simmering hatred toward white people. It is not difficult to spot the face contorting hatred Michelle Obama exhibits whenever she is forced to interact with or speak about white people. It's unexplainable why she is like this because outside of the manufactured media created image, she has never been poor nor has she endured the hardships normally associated with so called black poverty.

It is now being acknowledged at long last that black people have the same access to education and government services as anyone else and it isn't the white man that forces them to drop out, kill each other, join street gangs, deal in drugs, to have babies out of wedlock or live on welfare.

The condition of black people in America is a result of their own poor decision making, not the white man or the 'lingering legacy of slavery'. Many impressionable black people are influenced by the race baiting and hate filled behavior of people like Oprah Winfrey, Eric Holder and the Obamas. Shame on them.

Black people in America have succeeded in all fields from politics, sport, entertainment, business, industry, the military, medicine etc. etc. People such as Colin Powell, Condaleezza Rice, Bill Cosby, Michael Jordan, Jay Z, Dr Ben Carson, Herman Cain and millions more. Even the President of the United States and the First Lady are black. ( In Barry's case only half black).

It has to be accepted that the there is no 'lingering legacy of slavery'; that's all gone, its over and done with but it is still being used as an excuse by unscrupulous race baiters to make a good living out of perpetuating hatred.

This is a stunning intervention in the debate by American war hero and former black Congressman from Florida, Colonel Allan West. He says it better than anyone.

"This is my clear and succinct message to white Americans. How long will it be before 'you people' realize you have elevated someone to the office of president who abjectly hates you - not to mention his henchman Holder. Combined they are the most vile and disgusting racists - not you."

Many black people are seeing the light as demonstrated by the people such as Bill Cosby.

Here is a must see video of a black American who gets it and isn't afraid to tell the truth.

This is a hilarious video of a black Pastor who also gets it. If one can ignore his ranting style the message is potent.

Playing The Race Card - The Cynical 'Progressive' Tactic And Its Poisonous Legacy

Everyone who follows the political scene and millions of those who don't but do read the newspapers, will have shook their heads and let out a groan of despair as some unscrupulous politician uses the race card in order to garner votes from their special interest group.

This tactic is now depressingly familiar and it has become one of the main weapons in the armoury of the cynical low life's that masquerade as the representatives of the people and who infest the legislatures of the western democracies like a disease.

Unfortunately, regularly using this tactic has serious negative consequences in that it gives people of ethnic extraction a hypertrophied sense of entitlement which in turn, poisons their minds against the host nation should their expectations or demands not be met.

In addition to this, it also brands industries, institutions, and in the case of black British footballer Sol Campbell, the entire nation as racist.

It's worth noting at this point that the biggest use of the race card in history was the election of the 'Progressive' in Chief across the pond, Barack Hussein Obama. The narrative was that the reason white people were not supporting Obama was his skin colour. This was outrageous, not to mention contemptible but combined with the utter uselessness of John McCain and his campaign, it ultimately proved to be successful.

Emboldened by that success, the tactic is still in use today with 'progressive' politicians and their media whores smearing politicians who oppose Obama's socialist policies as a racist. This has had the poisonous effect of dividing the nation on racial grounds which does not bode well for the future.

History will not judge Obama well on account that he could have used the fact that he is half white to unite the nation and bring all races together: instead he chose to align himself with his bitter and twisted, America hating wife who can barely contain her hatred for white people and his Attorney General, Eric Holder, who's hatred for white people is all consuming.

In Great Britain the corrosive effect of using the race card is becoming apparent, not only among the welfare crippled entitlement addicts in the ghettos but by people higher up the economic ladder who should know better.

The case of footballer Sol Campbell is a classic example of how a black person has expectations beyond his capabilities and then goes on to blame skin colour when those expectations are not likely to be met.

It's worth those who have never heard of Sol Campbell persevering with this article because of its illustrative value, demonstrating how unfulfilled expectations by ethnic minorities is blamed on skin colour and an entire nation is branded as racist.

It must be conceded from the outset that Sol Campbell, like many footballers of all ethnic backgrounds, was not at the front of the queue when the brains were handed out, therefore his susceptibility to the dark arts of political spin is higher than that of the informed citizen.

Great Britain's most prolific user of the race card is Labour Member of Parliament Diane Abbott. This political low life has, in common with Sol Campbell, a Jamaican ancestry: she is also an unreconstructed socialist hypocrite of the very highest order. She is a racial bigot who sees everything through the prism of skin colour and who will play the race card at every opportunity.

As a fellow Londoner it would be very surprising if Campbell was not influenced by the anti-British nonsense poured forth by Diane Abbott.

She is notorious for her hypocrisy over education where she campaigns to scrap private schools on the grounds that they are elitist and unfair but pays to educate her own son at one of these despised institutions. She was also appointed as Shadow Minister for Public Health where, in good old socialist fashion, she proceeded to lecture the British public about healthy diets and life styles whilst being hideously obese herself.

It is people of Abbott's ilk that put ideas into the heads of impressionable black people: she preaches that by virtue of them being from an ethnic minority they are special, they are entitled to a future and that they are being robbed of their entitled destiny by 'archaic' British attitudes towards black people.

After a stellar career playing in the top echelons of national and international football, Campbell decided that he would like to go into football management but before he has even started he has also decided that his management career is being obstructed by racism.

This is surprising because he has not yet managed a football club nor has he got the qualifications that are necessary to become a football manager in the first place. Perhaps he is making excuses in advance in anticipation of failure or maybe he has issues with self esteem: whatever the reason using the race card is as unacceptable as it was predictable.

Campbell's attitude and pronouncements are straight out of the Diane Abbott handbook of racial bigotry and send entirely the wrong message to young black people which will only serve to further the animosity between races in the future.

Another sad fact about Campbell's pronouncements is that they are a based on preconceived ideas, falsehoods and outright lies. Campbell claims that racism is forcing him abroad in order to pursue his management career, giving the impression that he is being exiled against his will to the frozen wastes of Siberia. He is disingenuously omitting the fact that many of Great Britain's managers have plied their trade, and are still plying their trade abroad today. This includes his former Arsenal club mate Tony Adams who pursued his management career in the frozen wastes of Azerbaijan without  complaint.

As of 2011 there were over a hundred managers and coaches from Great Britain pursuing their careers abroad, from Iceland in the North to Australia in the South, from the Pacific Coast of America in the West to Hong Kong in the East: This includes coaches working in Campbell and Abbott's ancestral home of Jamaica.

It is apparent that Campbell has a sense of entitlement and expectations way above his  capabilities and if these are not met it will be because of the 'archaic' attitudes of the British toward black people and not because of his own inadequacies.

Sol Campbell's attitude is a classic example of  the damage the Diane Abbott's of this world do when they continually use skin colour in pursuit of votes and their perverted political agenda. Inter racial animosity in the future will be the poisonous legacy of low life political opportunists like Abbott continually using the race card.

If Great Britain is as bad as they make out then both Diane Abbot and Sol Campbell need to explain to the British people why their parents exchanged an idyllic, sun drenched island in the Caribbean, surrounded by fellow black people, for a cold, damp island in the north Atlantic inhabited by racist white people who's only object in life was to obstruct them in their chosen careers?