Meet Our Climate Extinction Saviors

A Picture Gallery of People Who Will Save Us from Climate Extinction

This is Greta Thunberg.

A Swedish schoolgirl who, with no scientific qualifications whatsoever, ordained at eight years old that the world faced extinction in ten years because of man-made global warming.

This is Ed Miliband.

The multi-millionaire Marxist and former leader of the Labour Party. This grown adult with no scientific qualifications drools over every word uttered by the Swedish schoolkid. As Energy and Climate Change Secretary in the last Labour government he was responsible for the Climate Change Act 2008 which is regarded as the most expensive piece of legislation in the history of Parliament.

This is Jeremy Corbyn.

Another multi-millionaire Marxist, Jeremy is the current leader of the Labour Party and possible Prime Minister should Boris Johnson fall. He also hangs on every word that the Blessed Greta speaks and without any scientific qualifications he wants Great Britain to declare a climate emergency to save us all from extinction.

This is Shamima Begum.

A British schoolgirl and alumni of the Bethnal Green Academy. At around the same age as Greta Thunberg she ordained that there will be a global caliphate and eventually the whole world will be governed by shariah law. To that end she left her homeland to join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to help prove herself right.

This is Jeremy Corbyn (Again)

In a complete about turn around from Greta Thunberg, Jeremy has decided that Shamima was just a schoolgirl who was much too young to understand the issues involved. Despite being an AK-47 wielding leader of a shariah enforcement unit in Syria and possible war criminal, Jeremy believes she should be allowed to come ‘home’ to the country she hates and vows to destroy. According to Jeremy she is not really a gun wielding terrorist she's just a very naughty girl. 

This is Theresa May.

Known as Theresa the Appeaser, she is the Europhile former Prime Minister of Great Britain who was ousted for lying, cheating and depriving the electorate of their birthright to be an independent, sovereign nation. As a final show of contempt for the British people she has committed trillions of pounds of taxpayer’s money to reduce Carbon emissions to zero and make the country Carbon free by 2050. With no scientific qualifications it is obvious that Mrs. May doesn’t know the difference between Carbon and Carbon Dioxide.

This is Prince Harry and the Grand Duchess Meghan of Markle.

Since his marriage to his Hollywood starlet, Harry has cast in his lot with the Tinseltown set and adopted their world view of all things trendy. These trendy causes include saving the planet from climate change by ordering governments to curb everyone’s carbon footprint except his own.

This is Albert ‘Al’ Gore.

Al Gore is the High Priest of the man-made global warming cult. Despite having no scientific background this former Vice President and failed Presidential candidate made a series of apocalyptic predictions of doom due to man-made global warming none of which has come true. It's an inconvenient truth that Polar bears and the Arctic ice cap are still there as are the Himalayan glaciers and the snows of Kilimanjaro. Al spends his time travelling the world by private jet and limousine telling lesser mortals to curb their carbon footprints by returning to the stone age. So lucrative is his crusade, Al is reputed to be the first carbon billionaire.

This is Rajendra Pachaury.

An engineer with the Indian railways with no scientific background, Pachaury was the chairman of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Another jet setter, this snake oil salesman shared a Nobel Prize with Al Gore for their efforts promoting the climate change scam and the precautions that need to be taken. Pachaury was forced to resign after allegations of corruption and alleged sexual abuse of women.

This is Extinction Rebellion.

This organization is comprised of schoolkids playing truant, egged on by the immature offspring of rich parents who spoiled their brats from an early age. They are joined by members of the unwashed, unemployable loony left who are no use to man nor beast. They claim we will be going the way of dinosaurs in ten years if we don’t hand over control of everything to the political class who only have our best interests at heart. (Yea right). We should be eternally grateful that these fearless warriors superglue themselves to office walls and stop traffic to save the human race from itself.   

This is Rex Fleming.

If ever there was expert on atmospheric science and climate it's this gentleman. His impressive Curriculum Vitae is longer and more complex than the issue itself. Read it here and be seriously impressed.

Rex Fleming worked for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). He was also a member of the UN IPCC with Mr. Pachaury. Because he questioned the conclusions and actions of the IPCC and the whole issue of man-made global warming, he is insulted and smeared as a ‘denier’ by the self-appointed 'experts' mentioned above and their fellow members of the climate change cult. He is being ostracized by the grant chasing scientists of the global warming industry while attempts are being made to prevent him publishing scientific papers and data that disproves the man-made global warming claims of the charlatans.

The world should demand to see a televised public debate between Rex Fleming and all of the above on climate change science. Unfortunately Shamima Begun will be unable to attend as she is in jail awaiting trial somewhere in Syria. 

To conclude: Carbon Dioxide is not an atmospheric pollutant, it is a trace gas essential to life on earth. It is plant food without which humans really would become extinct.

For the British contingent. Carbon Dioxide is 0.05% of the atmosphere. Of that tiny percentage 97% is natural leaving only 3% attributable to human activity. Of that 3% only 1.1% is produced by Great Britain. If emissions were reduced to zero tomorrow or by 2050 the effect on the climate will be zero. The declaration of a climate emergency by the British political class is not only virtue signaling of the very highest order but an unprecedented power grab from the people to the politicians who hold them in contempt.     

Brexit Hero Censured Then Treated The Offending Bureaucrat With Contempt

Nothing can lighten the heart of abused patriots more than watching one of their elected representatives publicly treat one of the most powerful European Union bureaucrats with complete and utter contempt. What gives it even more satisfaction is that he did it using an article of scorn introduced into popular usage by Winston Churchill, arguably Great Britain's most loved and greatest Prime Minister.

When Brexit hero Nigel Farage referred to two leading Europhile Members of the British Parliament as 'quislings'  and the 'high priests of European federalism' he was censured by the odious German socialist, Martin Schultz who, when he's not putting his visceral hatred for Great Britain on public display, is the unelected President of the phony European Parliament.

What made matters infinitely worse for 'President' Schultz was that Farage had the temerity to make his charge of treachery at the very heart of his power, i.e. the chamber of the European Parliament. As usual Farage and his small band of fellow Brexiteers was outnumbered and surrounded on all sides by his enemies and the enemies of freedom. (See the whole episode here)

Anti-Great Britain fanatics Nick Clegg and 'Red' Ed Miliband are the former leaders of the Liberal Democrats and Far-left Labour Party respectively. They both resigned their positions after being rejected by the British people at the last general election but they remain Members of Parliament.

The article of scorn was named after Norwegian traitor, Vidkun Quisling, who surrendered his country's sovereignty to Germany during World War II then governed Norway on behalf of the National Socialist German Workers Party until their defeat by the Allies.

Despite the overwhelming vote for Brexit, Miliband and Clegg are still actively campaigning for what is left of British sovereignty to be surrendered to the German dominated European Union with themselves in the Westminster Parliament governing Great Britain on behalf of the mentally unstable German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.

In modern usage 'quisling' is used in reference to people who's loyalty is not to their native country but to an occupying force or to a foreign entity with which they actively and willingly collaborate to subvert the nation. Therefore the use of 'quisling' for Messrs. Clegg and Miliband is accurate and wholly appropriate.

Nobody could deliver scorn quite like Winston Churchill and he did it with particular venom when he addressed the allied delegates in June 1941:

"A vile race of Quislings - to use a new word which will carry the scorn of mankind down the centuries - is hired to fawn upon the conqueror, to collaborate in his designs and to force his rule upon their fellow countrymen while grovelling low themselves. Such is the plight of once glorious Europe".

As potent as they are, words alone cannot convey the complete, utter and absolute contempt Churchill held for those who would surrender their countries' sovereignty to a foreign entity and then collaborate with that same entity to rule the subject people on its behalf.

Freedom lovers and British patriots take heart, boost your morale and listen to the great man deliver the speech here

Churchill used it again when he addressed both Houses of Congress in December 1941 after America entered the war:

"Hope has returned to the hearts of scores of millions of men and women, and with that hope there burns a flame of anger against the brutal corrupt invader. And still more fiercely burn the fires of hatred and contempt for the filthy Quislings whom he has suborned".

These words of contempt and scorn are as fitting today as they were when they were delivered by Winston Churchill back in 1941. They describe accurately the treacherous Clegg, Miliband and a host of other prominent people and celebrities who are indeed 'hired to fawn upon the conqueror and to collaborate in their designs to force their rule upon their fellow countrymen while grovelling low themselves'.

Shame on them and curse on all their houses. They are insulting our 'Glorious Dead' with their treachery and they have surrendered the right to call themselves British.

* For the record, after the war Vidkun Quisling suffered the fate that all traitors should suffer, he was tried for murder and high treason, found guilty then put up against a wall and shot by firing squad.

Whoever Wins The British Election England Will Lose

As the British people go to the polls in what has been described as the most important election in a generation, the outcome has never been more assured. England and its people will lose by a huge margin.

With seventy five percent of British laws coming from the European Union, all the major players who will eventually form a coalition government are committed to surrendering the other twenty five percent.

What the British people are voting for is the right of their chosen candidate to wield the rubber stamp for the deluge of laws and regulations that will inevitably pour forth from Brussels when their candidates take power on Friday.

The election itself is too close to call and it is predicted that no single party will have enough seats to form a government on its own. The party with the most seats will most likely form a coalition government in harness with one or more of the minor parties.

With the exception of the United Kingdom Independence Party, referred to as Ukip, and some remaining diehards in the Conservative and Northern Irish parties, all the remaining parties that are available for coalition are anti-English.

The Labour Party's move to the far left has been dramatic since the trade union sponsored Marxist, Ed Miliband, was installed as its leader. His entire family led by his late father, Adolph, has been dedicated to the downfall of Great Britain with a communist system being installed in its place.

Red Ed as he is known is committed to Great Britain surrendering whats left of its sovereignty and  being fully absorbed in the United States of Europe federal superstate. Further more he has let it be known that the British people will not be consulted or have a say via a referendum. In true Marxist fashion his contempt for the people is total.

The Scottish Nationalist Party, known by its initials the SNP, despise the English with unbridled passion. They will do everything in their power to break up the current United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and set up an independent socialist country governed by Scots in Edinburgh.

Their visceral hatred for England and the English people has blinded them to the fact that an independent Scotland will be governed, as now, by EU bureaucrats in Brussels and not locally grown socialist ideologues in Edinburgh.

In tandem with the SNP, the Welsh Party, known as Plaid Cymru, is another English hating nationalist party that espouses an independent socialist country governed by them in Cardiff. Like the SNP they haven't quite worked out how they will do this when all power to legislate will be held in Brussels.

The Welsh people are renown for their blind obedience to the Labour Party no matter how their loyalty has been abused over the years, therefore Plaid Cymru are seen more as an irritant as opposed to a serious political player.

If they throw they hands in with the SNP and Red ED's Labour Party they may be able to extract some concessions but their influence over all will be minimal.

The ridiculously named Liberal Democrat Party is a disgrace to political life and to democracy itself. This party is nothing more than a well financed group of power hungry charlatans and consummate liars who traverse the country saying whatever needs to be said to any particular group in order to secure their vote. Having secured them they promptly renege and continue pursuing their pro-EU, socialist agenda as before.

They are fanatically dedicated to the United States of Europe and long for the day when England is no more and Great Britain is reduced to a group of provinces in the greater European federal superstate.

This brings us to the Conservative Party who are forecast to be the largest party after the election and will consequently get first dibs at forming a coalition government.

Like the other parties, this party is committed to the United States of Europe project and who has lost most support to Ukip. Its leader, David Cameron, is a fanatical Europhile who is falsely promising to re-negotiate British terms of membership of the EU while at the same engineering its expansion into the former Soviet republics.

Envisaging a European Union Empire "from the Ural Mountains in the east to the Atlantic Ocean in the west" are hardly the words of someone who is not totally committed to the EU project.

Since all these parties are as one when it comes to the European Union project, which includes imposing so called 'multi-cultural societies' using open border mass immigration, whichever combination forms the next government, England will be doomed.      
 
The pro-EU ideologies of all the party leaders demands that they surrender the remaining twenty five percent of Great Britain's legislative power to Brussels as commanded by the Lisbon Treaty which was signed without the promised referendum.

Scotland and Wales will survive as national entities in the United States of Europe albeit powerless but it is proposed that England will be divided into North and South with one region being aligned with Scandinavia and the other with France and Spain.

Outside of Ukip, England has no friends, not even its own people, who will vote in their millions for the anti-England parties who's final act will be to legislate for their own demise.

The following words have been ringing through my head all day and after writing this article I know exactly why ."You don't know what you've missed till its gone, they paved Paradise and put up a parking lot"
 
         

Red Ed Miliband Great Britain's First Jewish Prime Minister

There's more bullsh*t dumped on the campaign trail than there was on the Chisolm Trail during the cattle herding days of yesteryear. As the public get tired of the usual diet of false promises, mudslinging and choreographed public appearances, the candidates get ever more desperate for a gimmick that will differentiate them from their opposition.

With the British general election drawing ever closer, the mandatory photo opportunities with babies, schoolkids and ethnic minorities are getting tedious in the extreme. Watching the three establishment party leaders David Cameron, Nick Clegg and David Miliband pretending to enjoy a pint of ale in a pub, visiting workers on the factory floor or visiting an old peoples home is laughable.

Their awkwardness is obvious as they attempt to switch from a remote, machine politician to an ordinary human being even for the short time it takes for a photo op.


The biggest laugh can be had watching these so called serious politicians make complete fools of themselves by donning turbans in order to win the ethnic vote.

One would have thought that in the interests of cultural sensitivity and respect, self confessed atheists such as Miliband and Clegg would not despoil the sanctity of any house of worship by entering inside, but when there's votes to be had nothing is sacred.

The fact is that the three establishment parties have hired professional spin doctors and media managers to organise and run their respective campaigns, they use the same formula with the MSM which results in a common mediocrity.

With three identical politicians from identical exclusive backgrounds who look the same, sound the same and champion the same 'progressive' policies, it's a difficult task for the spin doctors to find that one gimmick that will set their man apart from the others.

It would appear that Ed Miliband's expensively hired American spin merchant, David Axelrod, thinks he has found the answer.

Despite being a Marxist and an avowed atheist, Red Ed is being touted as Great Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister. At first glance it would appear to be a spin doctor's gift from heaven but on reflection it exposes some embarrassing realities that perhaps would have been better kept out of the public eye.

As every pre- comprehensive school history student knows, Benjamin Disraeli was Great Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister as well as one of its most renown.

It is argued that he is disqualified because he converted to Anglicanism but history confirms that this was the result of political expediency. Had he not converted he would have been illegible for Parliament because Jewish Members were forbidden at the time. Disraeli was a proud Jew and used the fact in political debate.

In one noted exchange he is quoted as saying: "Yes, I am a Jew, and when the ancestors of the right honourable gentleman were brutal savages on an unknown island, mine were priests in the Temple of Solomon"

David Axelrod is a foreigner therefore his ignorance of British history can be excused but Ed Miliband has no such excuse.....or has he?

The truth is that Red Ed is a first generation immigrant with no roots in Great Britain. His father, Adolph, was a Marxist fanatic from Belgium who held a special hatred for Great Britain along with its institutions and its people.

He despised the Monarchy, Parliament, the Church of England and most of all the patriotism of the British people. He plotted all his life to bring it down and install a Soviet style communist system in its place.

It should be obvious even to the most detached observer that Ed Miliband is a chip off the old block who's loyalty is to Marxism, not to Great Britain or Judaism. He is committed to a borderless, centrally controlled federal European Union ruled by appointed bureaucrats in Brussels as opposed to democratically elected representatives in Westminster.

It is not beyond the realms of possibility that Axelrod is using Ed's tenuous link to Judaism as an attempt to align him with the tough, uncompromising Prime Minister of Israel.

Unfortunately for Axelrod, when Ed was studying Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto, Benyamin Netanyahu was hunting down and killing the Palestinian terrorists to which Ed's Labour Party gives succour.

In reality, one cannot be a Jew and not believe in God just as one cannot be a Muslim and not believe in Allah. Much to the consternation of David Axelrod, it turns out that Ed Miliband is as Jewish as the Pope so it's back to the drawing board in search of another gimmick.

Ed Miliband is short of noteworthy accomplishments to champion so to assist Axelrod in his search he might consider touting Red Ed as the fastest Rubik Cube solving Prime Minister.


The first openly Marxist Prime Minister

The first atheist Prime Minister

The first British Prime Minister unable to handle a cup of tea

Most noteworthy is the fact that Ed Miliband, at the behest of the trade unions barons, stabbed his brother David in the back to seize the leadership of the Labour Party from under his nose, therefore Ed could be touted as the first fratricidal Prime Minister.

Due to millions of undiscerning, low information voters, the odds are good that on May 8th, as useless and incompetent as he is, Ed Miliband will indeed be Great Britain's Prime Minister and may the Lord have mercy on us all.



 

Patriotism Is No Longer The Preserve Of Racists And The 'Far Right'

With election campaigns gathering speed on both sides of the Atlantic, the long suffering electorates of both countries are being force fed hypocrisy and doublespeak on a massive scale.

Modern day elections are no longer fought on the campaign trail where candidates engage the electorate on their doorsteps or by debating their policies at open public meetings; they are won by the party with the slickest media campaigns where actual policies are replaced by mudslinging and the demonising of political opponents.

Dedicated grass roots party activists have been replaced by expensively recruited PR professionals, advertising executives and image consultants who design media campaigns based on information supplied by political scientists using information from pollsters and focus groups.

Proof of this perversion of democracy is not difficult to highlight. One would think that after a five year Parliament the current representatives would know exactly the issues that are of most concern to their constituents and therefore campaign accordingly.

In Great Britain at least, the days when politicians listened to their constituents and represented them in Parliament are long gone. Expensive foreign PR consultants are deigned to be better equipped to write manifestos and decide what's best for the people.

David Cameron's Conservative Party has hired Australian Lynton Crosby, a professional PR man, as their top election strategist.

Ed Miliband's Labour Party have hired American David Axelrod, President Obama's PR man, as their election strategist.

Nick Clegg's ridiculously named Liberal Democrat Party have engaged, as opposed to hired, a South African PR man named Ryan Coetzee. While the other two parties are paying their PR men out of party funds, the Liberal Democrats are re-charging the taxpayer for the services of Mr. Coetzee.

The idea that an Australian, an American and a South African are best qualified to articulate the hopes and aspirations of the British people is absurd. They are hired as propagandists to convince the electorate by fair means or foul, mainly foul, that the politicians are on their side when they are so obviously not.

As far as the British election is concerned, what should have been a straight forward excersise for the PR men in obfuscation and election bribery has been thrown into confusion by the rise of non-establishment parties, namely the United Kingdom Independent Party, known as UKIP, the Green Party and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

The Greens and the Nationalists have their niches of support but it is UKIP that is causing the most consternation in the ivory towers of the establishment party elites.

After decades of sovereignty stripping, oppressive regulations and unrelenting looting of taxpayers money by the European Union bureaucrats, along with their policy of open border mass immigration, has resulted in a trickle of support for UKIP becoming a flood.

The UKIP message is simple: Great Britain should be a self-governing, sovereign nation as opposed to a chattel of the Soviet style EU. The British people should resume control over their borders and adopt a points based managed immigration system as opposed to the current free for all madness. British values should be paramount, with British culture unashamedly celebrated as opposed to being suppressed.

Up until the surge of support for UKIP, the three legacy parties used their long established strategy of insult and smear, accusing UKIP and its supporters of being racist and members of the 'far right'.

David Cameron lowered the tone of the debate, tarnishing the office of Prime Minister in the process, by accusing multitudes of decent British citizens of being "loonies, fruitcakes and closet racists" because they love their country and prefer it to be sovereign.

As the election campaign progresses and support for UKIP holds firm, it would appear that controlling immigration with a view to reducing the numbers, clamping down on EU regulations, returning some sovereignty to Parliament, teaching British values in schools and celebrating British culture is commendable after all.

The foreign PR men of the three establishment parties have decided that 'multi-culturalism' is not that hot after all and patriotism is no longer the preserve of racists and the 'far right'.

The pollsters and the focus groups confirm that UKIP's pro-British policies are resonating with the electorate and therefore, guided by their PR machines, the politicians have adopted the position that what was thoroughly despicible yesterday can be celebrated as laudable today.

In reality what is thoroughly despicable is the hypocrisy and base behavior of an untrustworthy political class that knows no shame and which is devoid of ethics, principle or any trace of decency.

A pox on all of them.

The Gettysburg Address - David Cameron Is No Abraham Lincoln

Address delivered at the dedication of the cemetery at Gettysburg.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those here who gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate - we can not hallow - we can not consecrate this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note , nor long remember what we say here, but they can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this nation under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

                                                                                                                                  Abraham Lincoln

November 19. 1863.

Without the top and bottom lines most students from the pre-progressive education era will still recognise this as the Gettysburg Address, delivered by President Abraham Lincoln while consecrating the war cemetery after the battle of Gettysburg during the final stages of the American Civil War.

Most students will not have committed it to memory but they will be familiar with its sentiments, particularly the last line. They will also acknowledge that it was delivered by a man so immense that despite his humble beginnings and demeanor, he strides across history like a colossus.

It is believed that President Lincoln wrote this speech himself on November 18/19 while travelling from Washington DC to Gettysburg. It is also believed that he was seriously ill at the time, suffering from the initial stages of smallpox.

With all this in mind it is worth contrasting Abraham Lincoln, together with this defining moment in history, with the current crop of political leaders as the world created by the fallen from both the New World and the Old, goes to hell in a hand basket.

The catalyst for this article was British Prime Minister David Cameron and his threat to sack any government minister who does not back him over a his proposed EU renegotiation and referendum.

(Since the leaders of the EU, including the Supreme Leader, Angela Merkel, have ruled out any
re-negotiation this is regarded as a cynical election tactic by Cameron) 

It is obviously beyond his comprehension that these ministers are elected to represent their constituents who in ever increasing numbers disagree with Cameron's subservience to the EU bureaucrats. Either this or he believes the views of the people are irrelevant and should be ignored.

Whichever it is "government of the people, by the people, for the people" plays no part in his political philosophy or that of his administration. 

It is worth reminding ourselves that David Cameron is no Abraham Lincoln. There is no log cabin story here or grinding poverty. Nor is there self education, work in the real world or any experience whatsoever of the lives of ordinary people.

David Cameron hails from a remote, wealthy elite who was apparently 'spotted' at university as potential leadership material. Spotted by who and under what criteria remains a mystery.

He is a machine politician created by PR men, advertising executives and image consultants with the sole purpose of fronting the political elite who are committed to imposing their 'progressive' agenda on the British people whether they want it or not.

Unfortunately for the British people, David Cameron couldn't write a lunch order without his army of SpAds (Special Advisers), spin doctors and media management consultants let alone a Gettysburg Address.

While President Lincoln 'dedicated a portion of the battlefield as a final resting place for those who gave their lives that the nation may live', David Cameron attends the Remembrance ceremony at the Cenotaph knowing he is surrendering the sovereignty that our Glorious Dead sacrificed their lives to preserve.

At the same time he is dismantling the once mighty British military machine in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force thus consigning a major part of Great Britain's glorious past to history.

To add insult to injury he attended the Remembrance ceremony in the company of five of Great Britain's most notorious collaborators. This group of people are committed to the destruction of a sovereign Great Britain in favour of a post democratic federal super state.

These six political collaborators have done more to damage Great Britain's independence and sovereignty than Hitler's bombs ever did. In line with the demands of EU membership they have set about deliberately destroying British culture and its way of life for a mythical 'multi-cultural society'.

This willful destruction is social engineering on a massive scale designed to replace the cultures and ways of life of the individual nation states with a generic non-European citizen.

On the left is Gordon Brown, a Scottish socialist and misanthropist who harbours a particular loathing for the English people. Apart from his economic incompetence which broke the nation's finances, he signed the Lisbon Treaty breaking a specific promise to give the people a referendum first.

Next is Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed. He took over the leadership of the Labour Party after Brown's ejection from power. A first generation immigrant, he is a born and bred Marxist who is committed to the replacement of a sovereign Great Britain with a communist run United States of Europe. In line with his creed, he is opposed to the British people having a referendum on their future.

Next is the infamous Tony Blair, another Scotsman and committed Europhile. A growing number of British people consider Blair to be a war criminal for taking Great Britain into an illegal war with Iraq which cost hundreds of thousands of lives.

The refusal of the government, both British and American, to release the findings of the Chilcott inquiry into the Iraq war is considered by many to be the political establishment looking after one of its own.

Then comes Nick Clegg. The leader of the ridiculously named Liberal Democrat party is another Great Britain hating first generation immigrant who's dedication to the United States of Europe is legendary. Clegg also believes that the British people should not have a say on EU membership via a referendum.

Next to Clegg is former Prime Minister John  Major, a committed Europhile who signed the Maastricht Treaty. This more than any other treaty effectively ended Great Britain as an independent country thus giving away what Our Glorious Dead made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve. He did this without consulting the people first or giving them a referendum.

On the right is Cameron, the current leader of the movement dedicated to the replacement of the independent nation states of Europe with a post democratic federal super state.

The appearance of these politicians at the Cenotaph desecrates the monument and makes a mockery of the Remembrance ceremony.

It is worth noting that it's impossible to differentiate between the malign intentions of these six British politicians with those of the Norwegian politician and traitor Vidkun Quisling. Like Quisling they are surrendering their country to foreign rule to the detriment of the people they are supposed to be representing.

I would add in conclusion that there is one particular British politician that ranks alongside Abraham Lincoln in the annals of history and he had something to say about Quislings and those that tried to destroy the nation states of Europe.

Watch the must see video here.          

Politicians v The People - The Battle Of Britain Rages On

Having recently marked the centenary of the start of World War I and attended services on Remembrance Sunday honouring those who made the ultimate sacrifice for Great Britain's freedom, one would think that the British people would be enjoying the fruits of that sacrifice without hindrance.

Then one couldn't be more wrong. Malign forces both at home and abroad made the decision that the independent nation states of Europe, Great Britain included, must be abolished and replaced by a post democratic federal super state - in effect a United States of Europe.

This was unacheivable with the various cultures and traditional ways of life of the individual nation states, therefore these had to be destroyed in order to form a new generic European citizen.

This grandiose project would never have got off the ground had there been a consultation process or a referendum, therefore it was decided to impose it by stealth and coercion.

The initial stage in the deception was the Common Market. Once trapped inside this supposedly benign organisation morphing it into a sovereign state was relatively straight forward.

By implementing the Jean Monnet plan, sovereignty was transferred from the nation states to Brussels by deceit using a series of treaties each carefully disguised as being of mutual economic benefit. By the time the people became aware of the dastardly and thoroughly dishonest plan it was too late.

In parallel with the transfer of sovereignty, national cultures and traditional ways of life were being systematically destroyed using an open border mass immigration policy. This was coupled with coercion, anti-indigent legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness.

To effect this cultural vandalism on the British people - who incidentally, didn't ask for it, weren't consulted about it and didn't want it - it became necessary for the political class to declare war on their own people.

The political establishment and the traditional institutions, together with their armies of bureaucrats, apparatchiks and sycophants, have been stuffed with Common Purpose graduates who have been specifically trained to impose the EU project together with its cultural replacement agenda.

The individual behaviors of this enemy within is too enormous to include in this article but to give an idea of how dedicated they are, a look at the last news cycle speaks volumes.

The British people demand an end to open border mass immigration. Despite solemn promises 'to reduce net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands' it continues relentlessly upwards. The latest figures show it remains in the hundreds of thousands. Those who voice their consternation are smeared as racist, xenophobes, Islamophobes or Little Englanders.

With all the indecent haste they can muster, in order to alter the cultural profile of Great Britain permanently, the politicians handed out British passports with abandon. Some two hundred thousand last year with no decrease projected any time soon. This action will also allow the multi-culturalists to re-define what comprise British values.

The school inspection regime who labour under the grandiose title of the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (OfSTED), refused to correctly grade a school in the rural English town of Market Rasen because it isn't sufficiently multi-cultural. In other words its too English. The fact the town is ninety seven percent white English doesn't register with these fanatics.

To these bureaucrats white Anglo-Saxon England is the perceived enemy they are working to destroy.
 
To reinforce the point that Muslims are a vitally important part of the cultural replacement agenda, and therefore deserving of special treatment, West Midlands police applied to the courts to keep the identity of a Muslim grooming gang secret to protect their human rights.

One would have thought that the ongoing grooming scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and every other English city, where the police facilitated industrial scale child abuse by Muslim paedophile gangs, they would have been more sensitive. Apparently not, the multi-cultural agenda takes a much higher priority over the wellbeing young white girls.

The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, a Mr. Ed Davey, from the ever more ludicrous Liberal Democrat Party, insults anyone who objects to the government fire hosing taxpayers money on foreign vanity projects.

Such is the contempt Mr. Davey has for the British public, questioning the policy of borrowing and spending upwards of ten billion pounds per year on foreign aid when the the national debt is soaring inexorably skyward makes one a 'Little Englander'.

Finally, Labour Party big wig and Shadow Attorney General Emily Thornberry, tweeted a photograph of a white van parked outside a house adorned with the flag of St George as if it was some kind of abomination. (White van man is a demographic group within the working class)

It may not appear to be an issue of consequence until one realises that in the eyes of the wealthy, metropolitan elite that has taken over the working mans party, the Cross of St. George is on the list of proscribed items because it causes offence to foreigners.

Taking offence at anything quintessentially English forms part of the mindset of the self loathing socialist/communist/liberal community that has declared war on the British people. In case anyone is unfamiliar with current terminology, these are the people that now go around calling themselves 'progressives'.

As in all wars the battles rage to and fro but this particular one ends on a positive note which gives rise to some optimism.

Thornberry's remarks were made during the Rochester and Strood by-election campaign which was subsequently won by the anti-establishment, anti-EU  United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP),
the second such by-election victory in as many months.

As for the remote, Great Britain hating, metropolitan champagne socialist Emily Thornberry?  Her ignorance and ongoing war against the British people has attracted opprobium all round resulting in her resignation from the Labour Shadow Cabinet. This hopefully will be the final nail in the coffin of Red Ed and his elitist controlled Labour Party.

 

Still Generating Thatcher Hatred By Corrupting History

We have to accept that the days of honesty in political discourse are well and truly over having been replaced by spin, deceit, lies and propaganda. Distorting history has traditionally been the preserve of the victors in battle, in the case of modern political power seeking, politicians indulge freely.

These unscrupulous power seekers will say or promise anything to get their grubby hands on political power regardless of the cost to honesty, decency or moral integrity. It would appear that poisoning young minds by generating a visceral hatred of an opponent is an acceptable practice.

A chance meeting in a social club with an aspiring eighteen year old writer/politician revealed the truth about deliberately generated hatred. It was reminiscent of the 'three minute hate' made famous by George Orwell in his futuristic novel 1984.  

The young man in question has a "deep burning hatred in his heart for Margaret Thatcher...he will never forgive her for destroying the Welsh coal industry and his community".  Hatred on such a scale is a wasted emotion but it is a tragic waste when it is based on deliberately distorted history.

The fact that the correct version of history is easily accessible confirms that the young man has accepted the version of history given to him by unscrupulous ideologues and sadly fostered his burning hatred on the basis of it.

Presumably he will pass it on to the next generation and so forth with the result that the corrupted version is accepted as fact. Consequently political loyalty and votes will be assured in perpetuity.

I am not an apologist for Margaret Thatcher by any means nor do I endorse her policies but this gentleman's ignorance of the history about his local community is staggering. I feel it incumbent upon myself to put it right, demonstrating how history has been shamelessly distorted in the process.

The following facts are taken from South Wales Coalfield Series, Book 62. Merthyr Valley - Ray Lawrence Bsc. Also Collieries Of South Wales: Volumes 1 and 2 - John Cornwell

Our young friend's town and the surrounding area were thinly populated backwaters until the rise of iron making in the late eighteenth century. Four great ironworks were built between 1760 and 1780 causing an immigration boom which took the population into the tens of thousands. So it was iron and not coal that was responsible for the rise of his community in the first place.

Due to technical innovation and market pressures, the iron industry, along with the surrounding communities, went into decline in the 1860's and by the turn of the nineteenth century it was all but finished.

The remaining coal industry was still substantial consisting of over two hundred registered deep mines, drifts and levels in his home valley. The discovery of cheap, easily accessible oil started the decline of the coal industry but it was the recession starting in 1929 that just about finished it off.

By the time the industry was nationalised in 1947 the two hundred coal mines was reduced to four (4) and by 1955 that was reduced further to just two (2)

For the record Margaret Thatcher was born in 1925, became a research chemist then a barrister. She entered Parliament in 1959. She held the Education and Science portfolio until becoming Leader of the Opposition in 1975. By the time she became Prime Minister in 1979 the coal industry and its communities had already declined to the point of dereliction.

The facts that our aspiring friend chooses to ignore are that Margaret Thatcher wasn't born when the iron industry ended and was only four years old when the coal industry went into decline. She wasn't in Parliament at the time of nationalisation or when the industry was reduced to two mines in his valley.

The coal industry that remained was old, inefficient and costly. This necessitated a re-organisation which saw the Labour governments under Harold Wilson and James Callaghan closed two hundred and ninety mines.  The ongoing re-organisation saw a further one hundred and sixty close under Mrs. Thatcher's Conservative government. That's one hundred and thirty less than her Labour predecessors.

It was the year long miners strike of 1984/5 that raises the emotional temperature but the blame for that lies with the politically motivated leadership of the mine workers union. Arthur Scargill and Mick McGahey were two lifelong communists who had a deep loathing for the Conservative government and for Mrs.Thatcher in particular.

They misused the traditional loyalty of the mining communities in an attempt to bring down the democratically elected government. They refused to hold a national strike ballot and forbid local union lodges to hold one either. They left it the local miners whether to strike or work normally, those who decided to work normally were picketed out using threats, violence and intimidation.

It is the considered opinion of MR. Lawrence that had a ballot been allowed, the South Wales area would have voted to work normally.

The democratically elected government of fifty five million people was never going to submit to a union comprising one hundred and ten thousand members.  The remaining industry never recovered from the political ambitions of Messrs. Scargill and McGahey but agenda driven commentators ensured that Mrs.Thatcher got the blame.

Our aspiring young friend was horrified that someone could actually exonerate the object of his anger and vilification and pass the blame to his heroes. He obviously has an emotional need for fiction to become fact and vice verca

*In a footnote to this history it should be noted that if the industry had survived in some form after the malign attentions of Scargill and McGahey, it would have been finished by the restrictions set out in the Climate Change Act.

This industry killing legislation was put in place by the then Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change,  a Mr. Edward Miliband. Better known today as Red Ed, the leader of the Labour Party.

'This Is What A Feminist Looks Like' - PR Stunt Hides The Truth

The days when political discourse revolved around the various candidates publicly debating the issues disappeared when psephologists, pollsters and PR men took over elections, devaluing democracy in the process.

Democracy in Great Britain has been reduced to periodic elections where teams of spin doctors, marketing professionals and media managers create false images for a group of bland, photogenic automatons who possess the innate ability to lie with a straight face.

These generic candidates will be required to flawlessly repeat soundbites and slogans which are centrally generated by their various party PR and media management machines. They will also be required to take part in publicity stunts which for the cynical voter are sometimes so embarrassingly false they are a source of much hilarity.

Any PR person worth their salt would agree that a picture is worth a thousand words especially when trying to create an image or deliver a message that they want the public to swallow. Unfortunately for them, due to the Internet, they no longer have a monopoly of messaging therefore the same tactic can be used to strip away the veneer and reveal the truth.

Wearing a "This is what a feminist looks like" T-shirt in the House of Commons was a publicity stunt led by the Labour Party's premier feminist Harriet Harman. The message may have suited her reputation as a champion of women's rights but it also hid the truth about Harman and her 'progressive' agenda. Therefore taking leaf out of her PR departments book, here are some photographs to put the record straight.

"This is what a paedophile supporter looks like". One who wants to legalise sex between adults and children.

"This what a Muslim paedophile gang looks like". The gang that groomed, raped and sexually abused under age white girls with the full knowledge and connivance of her Labour Party on the grounds of 'cultural sensitivity'.

"This what a young female victim of a the Labour Party's client group of paedophiles would look like" if one could face the camera.

In the top photograph Harman is flanked on the left by her party leader Red Ed Miliband and on the right by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, the current leader of the ever more ridiculous Liberal Democrat Party.

"This is what a Liberal Democrat deviant looks like". The one that had a relationship with a young female constituent with special needs who originally came to him for help. Clegg finally acknowledged he knew about this but took no action at the time.

When senior politicians engage in publicity stunts of this nature they not only make themselves look ridiculous they also demean politics and embarrass the nation at the same time. Informed people are not fooled by this kind of cheap stunt and as has just been demonstrated they can be used to reveal the truth as well as to deceive.


Finally a couple of publicity stunts for your mirth and enjoyment:


 "This is what a pair of idiots look like when going after the Sikh vote".


 .









Update: Check The Mellow Jihadi for more Red Ed publicity stunt hilarity.

Racism, Bigotry And The 'Far Right' Are Acceptable When Chasing Votes

One of the most publicised incidents during the last British general election campaign was the labeling of Rochdale resident Gillian Duffy as "a bigoted woman" for having the temerity to mention immigration to the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

(Bigot story here)

The fact that Ms Duffy and her family were long time supporters of the Labour Party was of no consequence to the Brown or his Party, she had mentioned immigration with a negative connotation and was punished in accordance with the party's calculated tactic of demonisation and smear.

Rochdale is one of the multitude of close knit, post industrial towns in England that prides itself on close family and community ties. It is also one of the multitude of towns that has been disfigured beyond recognition by the Labour's Party's policy of cultural replacement using open border mass immigration. 

The Labour Party had long planned their covert cultural replacement agenda and knew that it would face fierce opposition once the horrific repercussions started to become apparent. Equality and hate crime laws were the main battering ram they used to bow the people into submission, along with a rigidly policed policy of political correctness.

Central to these policies, and to further back up the anti-British tactic of closing down debate, was the routine use of smear and demonisation. The Labour Party turned this into a fine art with a full time Smear Unit located at the heart of Brown's government in No 10 Downing Street. 

Anyone making a statement that was remotely critical of their immigration policy or made any reference to race, religion, ethnicity, no matter how innocuous, was seized upon by Labour's race zealots and met with insults, demonisation and smear. 

Insults such as racist, bigot, xenophobe and 'far right' were thrown around with abandon regardless of whether they were appropriate or not. The idea was to shame opponents into silence closing down any debate in the process. 

Despite promises to the contrary, it became apparent after they took office that the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition shared the same cultural replacement agenda of their predecessors. They also had no intention of dealing with open border mass immigration, political correctness or the policy of smearing anyone who questioned the agenda.

The coalition added to the armoury of insults by labelling people and groups who questioned open border mass immigration as 'far right'. The main proponent of this particular smear was none other than David Cameron's token Muslim woman cabinet member, the Baroness Warsi.

As an untalented, over promoted token appointment, the noble Baroness's attempts at linking opponents of mass immigration to more unsavoury elements was amateurish to the point of embarrassing. Prior to her resignation over her support for the terrorist group Hamas, she was in the habit of labeling any critic of mass immigration as 'far right'.

To say that the political class's mass immigration policy has been a complete and utter disaster would not only be the understatement of the century, it is also their declaration of war against the British people.

The British people didn't ask for this, they weren't consulted, they don't want it and it was never put in any election manifesto. The ruling political class, under orders from the global 'progressive' elite, were going to impose a so called  'multi-cultural society' regardless.

Consequently, villages, towns and vast areas of Great Britain's major cities are unrecognisable. Welfare financed, crime ridden, mono-cultural ghettos infest British cities with some operating under sharia law and consequently out of bounds for British citizens including the police.

With the connivance and approval of the political establishment and the local authorities, including the police, social services, care homes, schools and the media, the rape and sexual abuse of thousands of under age white girls by Muslim men was allowed continue.

(Rochdale Child abuse story here)

In addition to the increased competition for jobs, Great Britain's taxpayer funded social services including, education, health and housing have been put under intolerable strain by the unsustainable increase in the population.

Although they are yet to fully re-discover the bulldog spirit that defeated Hitler and the National Socialists, the British people are slowly awakening from their media induced slumber and fighting back against a patronising and malignant political class.

The phenomenon known as the United Kingdom Independent Party, usually referred to as UKIP or the People's Army, have been growing in influence for some years, taking support from the old legacy parties together with non-aligned and independent voters.

Their prime objective is getting Great Britain out of the European Union, regaining control over the borders, economic sanity via balanced budgets and most notably putting the interests of the British people above all others.

As a measure of their rising support they recently won the European elections, vastly increased their numbers of local councillors and won their first Member of the Westminster Parliament in a byelection. Their momentum has put the fear of God into the current political establishment who up until recently variously described them, among other things, as fascists, 'far right', xenophobes, little Englanders etc. 

The current Prime Minister David Cameron famously referred to UKIP supporters as "loonies, fruitcakes and closet racists".

The meteoric rise in support for UKIP and the corresponding fall in support for the legacy parties has heralded a change in the usual political discourse and in particular a change in language.

Not only are the policies and lexicon of UKIP no longer attracting the usual smears of racist, bigot and 'far right', they are actively being adopted by the three legacy parties.

The Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron spotted the threat earlier and has been making false promises for some time about border control, access to welfare for immigrants, deportation of foreign criminals and whole raft of measures he knows the EU bureaucrats will forbid him to action.

The rise of UKIP is heralding the end for Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and his ludicrously named Liberal Democrat Party. If ever there was a party of loonies and fruitcakes this collection of weirdos is it; to make the list of names more accurate we can add sex pests, fornicators, perverts and paedophiles. 

In a desperate attempt to ward off oblivion Clegg has softened his previously solid anti-British pro-immigrant stance and is talking in terms that would have attracted smears from him had they been spoken by a UKIP representative.

It has long been accepted that Cameron and Clegg are in total thrall to the EU bureaucrats and are prepared to lie, deceive, obfuscate and make any false promise to implement their masters agenda. It is the utter hypocrisy of the Labour Party that really beggars belief.

This is the party that has been most dedicated to the cultural replacement agenda and the most prolific in the use of insult, demonisation and smear to denigrate opponents. The Labour Party has an even uglier side it is wont to employ in order to intimidate its opponents. They call themselves Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and they violently disrupt UKIP activities hurling insults such as 'racist' and 'fascist' with abandon.

Supposedly independent of the Labour Party, UAF are in fact their unwashed, post-pubescent street activists who enjoy a bit slogan shouting, banner waving and aggravation. They enjoy pretend revolution along with bayonets and barricades rhetoric and a cup of hot chocolate from their mothers before bedtime.

(Labour and UAF here)

Labour Party leader Ed Miliband together with his second-in-command Harriet Harman and his Shadow Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper-Balls, are all stealing UKIP's clothes and talking the same UKIP language that attracted insults from them less than a week ago.

(Miliband hypocrisy here)

Harman hypocrisy here)

(Yvette Cooper hypocrisy here)

Yesterdays insults are no longer applicable when the ruling class want to use the same policies and arguments to steal the votes of the people they previously dismissed as racists and bigots. 

This kind of  cynical behavior and breathtaking hypocrisy is utterly disgraceful and serves as a clear demonstration of the abysmal standard of politician that has lied and spun their way into office. It is hoped that the rise of UKIP will consign these charlatans to the dustbin of history where they so rightly belong.   

       

The Working Class Can Kiss My A*se - The Labour Party Speaks

The rather rude headline comprises the alternative words to the communist anthem The Red Flag, the singing of which signals the closing of the Labour Party conference. This jamboree is an annual stage managed media event which is designed to give the impression that millionaires and wealthy career politicians have selflessly dedicated their lives to the well being of the working class. They try, unsuccessfully, to identify with working people by contrived working class behavior, laughable fake accents and class warfare rhetoric.

When I was growing up in the South Wales coalfield the Labour Party conference used to be a long awaited event and I assume it was the same in the other declining industrial areas of Great Britain. It was the annual showpiece where party policy, party officials and the party leadership were decided in open elections by representatives from the constituency parties, the trade unions and other affiliated organisations.

These conferences were televised allowing the public at large to watch the proceedings and become familiar with the processes and language of the working man's party. Those were days when 'motions' were read out before the delegates, including things called 'composite motions', a device where several different motions were rolled into one before the debate. After a succession of speakers for and against, the motions were put to the vote and became official party policy if so decided. The proceedings were interspersed with 'fraternal greetings' from well wishers and delegates addressed each other as 'comrade'.

The proceedings were, and still are, brought to a close with the traditional singing of The Red Flag by the delegates and officials.

Like every other aspect of modern politics the recently concluded Labour Party conference was stage managed from beginning to end by professional media mangers, not to decide what's right for the country or the British people but to give the impression that the political class actually cares what the people think and then making promises to act accordingly.

Every detail of the charade is choreographed and every speech carefully constructed by spin doctors to give the impression that the speaker identifies, and has empathy with, working people.

Despite the fact that the usual soundbites and slogans were repeated ad nauseum by speaker after speaker, the idea that the modern Labour Party is the party of the working man is not only risible but utterly delusional.

The spin doctors favourite words and soundbites such as; Fairness, Equality, Inequality, Working People, Hard Working People, Hard Working Families, Social Justice, Your NHS, Our NHS, The Rich etc. were trotted out in gay abandon in a shameless attempt to stir up envy and hatred using class warfare rhetoric.
(Equality article here)

It was obvious to all and sundry that these speeches, which are designed to appeal to the assumed prejudices of working people, are delivered by extremely wealthy career politicians who have never had a job in the real world that any normal person would consider as work.

The highlight of the conference is the speech by the party leader. The current leader of the working man's party is comrade Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed.

Ed Miliband is the millionaire son of the late Marxist academic Adolph 'Ralph' Miliband, a Belgian immigrant who was given sanctuary during World War II. After the war he went on to spend his life agitating for Great Britain's downfall and its subsequent replacement with a Soviet style communist country.

It is worth noting at this point the professionalism and dedication of Labour's media managers and their eye for detail. With an eye on the optics for Miliband's speech, they evicted the disabled delegates from the front of the auditorium and replaced them with more telegenic people. So much for the poor, the downtrodden and the disadvantaged.

His speech was a dreadful dirge of politic speak that is typical of a remote career politician, especially one who's life long dedication to doctrinaire Marxism has left him devoid of any personality or any capacity for original thinking. It didn't go unnoticed that apart from the soundbites mentioned above he failed to address, or even mention, what concerns working people most. i.e. the deficit, the EU, open border mass immigration and imposed multi-culturalism.
(Speech transcript here)

He also failed to make any reference to the Muslim paedophile scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale and other blighted towns despite nationwide publicity and national outrage. Muslim men were allowed to groom and subject underage white girls to rape and horrific sexual abuse unhindered by the Labour controlled authorities including the children's social services and the police.

These young victims lives were supposedly sacrificed in the interests of 'community cohesion' - in other words Ed Miliband's Labour Party allowed under age white girls to be raped and sexually abused by Muslim men because the imposition of a so called 'multi-cultural society' took a higher priority.

The iconic line from the anthem, 'When cowards flinch and traitors sneer' applies to Ed Miliband and the Labour leadership in spades. How can any politician, let alone a party leader who aspires to become Prime Minister, not mention this scandal,  the deficit or the catastrophic national debt in his headline conference speech? He also made no mention of an EU referendum that the people demand or any controls on the mass immigration that is blighting every village, town and city across the country.

He had no tangible policy to tackle radical Islam or the British documented jihadis who are returning from the Middle East battlefields and who are obviously a clear and present danger to the British people.

It came as no surprise to those who gave up Red Ed's brand of left wing politics when they reached puberty that he did promise the only policy that the one track mind of a life long Marxist can muster.  That is tax and spend. Regardless of the disastrous record of the last Labour government, he promised to raise taxation in order to pump even more money into 'our' NHS and elsewhere.

It would appear that the one hundred or so new taxes imposed by the last Labour government were not quite enough.

They want to impose a 'Mansion Tax' on expensive houses, more tax on tobacco products, raising the upper rate to fifty percent and once again for the umpteenth time, a tax on bankers bonuses.

The Mansion tax is a spiteful, ill thought out piece of class warfare designed to appeal to base instincts of his core voters. It fails to take into account that his victims could be asset rich and cash poor due to the unprecedented house price boom of the seventies and eighties.
(Mansion tax here)

The consequences of even more tax on tobacco will result in more people giving it up or moving to the black market, either way tax revenue will decrease.

Raising the upper tax rate to fifty percent is another spiteful piece of class warfare which every student in basic economics knows will decrease revenue to the Treasury.

Taxing the bonuses of the evil bankers is an old favourite which is rolled out whenever they want to galvanise their core voters. This is the fifth or so Labour Party social program that is going to be financed by bankers bonuses.

Whichever way the media managers and spin doctors present it, Labour Party policy has Marxism as its underlying core philosophy. Despite the evidence of history that communism/socialism, or progressivism as they now call it, always leads to poverty and misery for the majority, the transfer of wealth from the private sector to the politicians is the only policy they know.

The alternative lyrics to The Red Flag could have been penned especially for the Labour Party leadership of recent years. In spite of all the rhetoric about fairness, inequality and the rest of the nonsense they spout, when the Labour Party leadership talk about the redistribution of wealth they mean everyone else's which doesn't include their own.

Despite his Marxist beliefs and redistribution rhetoric, Ed Miliband is reputed to be worth some four million pounds. Un-redistributed, this fortune can only grow larger with his taxpayer funded package of ministerial level salary, allowances and expenses.

In conclusion it is worth looking at some of the previous leaders of the working man's party and their much trumpeted dedication to equality, fairness, social justice and the redistribution of wealth.

Hard line Scottish socialist Gordon Brown, the former Prime Minister and Red Ed's mentor and predecessor. His socialist policies wrecked the British economy in the name of fairness and social

justice. Rightly booted out of office he remains the MP for Kilkaldy and Cowdenbeath. He rarely attends Parliament but jet sets around the world, First Class no doubt, as some kind of UN ambassador. He subsidises the circa two million he makes from his charitable activities with his Parliamentary salary and generous expenses.

The story goes that most of his earnings go to charity but this cannot be verified. Either way he lives like a lord compared to his disenfranchised, poor and downtrodden constituents in Kilkaldy and Cowdenbeath.

Neil, now Lord Kinnock, the former Labour Party leader and career politician who, together with his wife Glenys, somehow managed to accumulate a ten million pound fortune. This is despite the fact that he never won a general election and had no experience in the business or wealth creating sector. Meanwhile their former constituents in South East Wales wallow in the same poverty and deprivation they suffered during the pre Kinnock era.
(Neil Kinnock story here, Glenys story here)

These money makers pale into insignificance compared to Tony Blair. Known as Phony Tony, he is another career politician who infamously stated that he "came to socialism via Marxism". He has accumulated a fortune estimated between twenty and one hundred million pounds. Like Kinnock, Miliband and Brown he has no experience in the business or wealth creating sector and appears to have no intention of putting into practice his philosophy by redistributing his wealth.



                It suits today the weak and base

                                                       Who's minds are fixed with pelf and place*

                                                       To cringe before the rich mans crown

                                                       And haul the sacred emblem down

This kind of hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed by the long suffering British public who have grown tired of their standard of living falling while being patronized by millionaires promising equality and fairness. Along with the other two legacy parties, Labour are scared witless by the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, known as UKIP.
(Labour's response to UKIP here)

Two of the reasons that this grass roots political party is resonating with the public is their use of honest straight talk instead of spin, centrally issued soundbites and slogans combined with the total absence of a*se kissing.

The Red Flag lyrics here.

The Alternative Red Flag lyrics here

Red Ed sings here