Conservatives and Marxists Singing from The Same Hymn Sheet

Watching the choreographed jousting by the politicians in Westminster one would think that the ideological divide between the supposedly capitalist Conservative Party on one side and Marxist Labour Party on the other was too wide to be bridged.

Spin and deception over honesty and substance is now the norm in politics as the ruling elite try to hoodwink the electorate in order to impose their agenda.  

One must ignore the spin, the speeches and the rhetoric and pay attention the policy details of both parties to see they share a common agenda.

Although they claim otherwise the Conservative Party has long since abandoned capitalism, individual liberty and small government as a means of increasing the wealth of the nation to bring prosperity to its citizens. Instead they have become a party of social justice and government-imposed equality and fairness like their supposed ideological enemies.

If the gaggle of candidates jostling to replace the appalling Theresa May are anything to go by the British people are doomed to a future of high taxes, high spending and big government in a country crushed by rigidly policed political correctness.

The leader of the pack for the future leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister of Great Britain is the dripping wet liberal and social justice warrior, Dominic Raab. His campaign tag for his leadership campaign is “For a Fairer Britain” which is an echo of the Labour Party tag for the 2010 General Election “A Future Fair for All”.

On the biggest single issue of the day Raab has given little indication that he will fulfill the mandate given to the political class and free Great Britain from the European Union and its undemocratic, centralized institutions.

As Secretary of State for Exiting the EU he was responsible for negotiating Great Britain's withdrawal but he was comprehensively outmanoeuvred and humiliated by a group of dedicated Europhile civil servants who were determined that the country should remain. 

Instead of killing off Theresa the Appeaser’s failed and discredited Withdrawal Agreement he thinks he can negotiate changes that will be acceptable to Parliament and the people. This is something the EU bureaucrats have made abundantly clear they will not contemplate. 

He is repeating Mrs. May's dishonest mantra that we will be leaving the EU on the, 29th March 12th April, 31st October with or without a deal.

In line with the policy of Jeremy Corbyn's Marxist Labour Party, it looks likely Great Britain will remain locked into the despised EU should Dominic Raab take the helm.

Ignoring the wishes of the people, and in line with Labour Party policy, Dominic Raab intends to keep fire hosing 0.7% of Great Britain’s Gross National Product (GDP) on giveaway aid to foreign dictators.

While public services and infrastructure is starved of cash at home, this irresponsible largess is running at fourteen billion pounds per year and due to deficit budgeting every penny is borrowed and must be paid back with interest. With the national debt at record levels that interest bill alone comes to some forty-eight billion per year.

In common with the Labour Party, Raab plans to continue with the anti-science climate change nonsense which is killing energy dependent industries at home costing jobs directly and indirectly while increasing fuel bills for everyone. 

This is putting pensioners and the less well off into fuel poverty where they are forced to decide whether its heat or eat.

Raab has given no indication he intends to put clear blue water between himself and the Labour Party on the burning issues of mass immigration, imposed multi-culturalism and forced acceptance of Islamic practises.

The wet-as-lettuce former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and David Cameron were forty-three and forty-four years of age respectively when they assumed the Premiership, and both proved to be complete and utter disasters in office. It’s fair to assume that the forty-four-year-old lawyer turned politician will also be too inexperienced to become a successful Prime Minister.

In conclusion, the signature policies of these ideologically opposed parties are so similar the consequences of their implementation will be exactly the same. High tax, high spending, high regulation, mass immigration and Islamification in country dominated by political correctness and still members of the hated EU.  

Treason – A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words

Two of the most poignant ceremonies in the British calendar are the wreath laying ceremony at the Cenotaph in London on Remembrance Sunday accompanied by the Festival of Remembrance held in the Royal Albert Hall.

Both events are led by Her Majesty the Queen and are held in solemn remembrance by the entire nation for all those who sacrificed their lives in two world wars so that Great Britain remained an independent, sovereign nation.

They sacrificed their lives so that Great Britain should remain a proud, independent and sovereign nation not for a few years or a few decades but from the day they died until the ending of world.

No politician or group of power brokers have the authority to surrender that sovereignty to a foreign entity especially when that entity is led by the former enemy against which ‘Our Glorious Dead’ died fighting.

The image above epitomizes not just the shameless hypocrisy of the current ruling elite but also serves as an appalling insult to the British people and those who made the ultimate sacrifice for their beloved nation.

Recent announcements by the de facto leader of the EU, the megalomaniac German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, along with President Macron of France and other EU leaders finally admitted what they have been denying for years; that they are in the process of forming an independent EU army under the control of themselves.

The politicians pictured above are laying wreaths in remembrance of those brave soldiers, sailors and airmen who died fighting for freedom against a German military machine while at the same time working to surrender that military to a political entity controlled by a megalomaniac German Chancellor.

On the left is former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, a rabid socialist who signed the Lisbon Constitution/Treaty which gave the European Union the status of a nation and handed over the sovereignty of Parliament to the unelected EU Commission which wields executive power.

Brown did this breaking a solemn promise to the British people that he would put the issue to a national referendum so that the people could decide the future governance of their country. In order to hide his treachery from the people, he signed Constitution/Treaty without the ceremony that previous treaties were signed.

Next to him is Jeremy Corbyn the current leader of the Labour Party and leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition in Parliament. An unreconstructed communist, this traitor has never made a secret of his hatred for Great Britain.

He signals his distaste at being obliged to attend the wreath laying ceremony by wearing a plastic jacket instead of formal attire and sporting the smallest possible poppy.

Behind Corbyn is former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, who is without question the most hated man in British public life. Considered to be a war criminal for taking Great Britain into an illegal war with Iraq, the calls for his indictment by the International Criminal Court grow louder by the day.

Blair is a totally dedicated disciple of the EU project to destroy the independent nation states of Europe and replace them with a single, centrally controlled superstate run by a cabal of unelected technocrats.

Suffering from the clinically recognized Hubris Syndrome, Blair still has ambitions to hold high office in the cabal or even lead it as their President.

Tony Blair has stated publicly that he will work tirelessly and do everything in his power to overturn the result of the Brexit referendum and keep Great Britain inside the corrupt and failing EU.

Next to Blair and partly obscured by Theresa May is former Prime Minister, Sir John Major. This man is notorious for two reasons. Firstly, he was part of the conspiracy that stabbed Margaret Thatcher in the back and removed her from office and secondly for signing the Maastricht Treaty without a promised referendum.

This treaty made the EU a legal entity and surrendered whole swathes of sovereignty from the British Parliament to the bureaucrats in Brussels.

Finally, on the right is current Prime Minister, Theresa May. Known as Theresa the Appeaser she is a committed Europhile who is in the process of betraying the nation with a Withdrawal Agreement that overturns the result of the Brexit referendum and keeps Great Britain locked into the EU while trying to claim that the country is no longer a member. This is the Brexit in name only (BRINO) the people were warned about when Europhile May was appointed Prime Minister.

Along with others from the ruling elite, these five conspirators have collaborated with a foreign entity to surrender the sovereign power of the British peoples elected Parliament to an unelected foreign tyranny.

They have conspired with this foreign entity to downgrade the legal and criminal justice system making the British people subject to the foreign European Court of Justice.

They have conspired with this foreign entity to dismantle the borders and flood the country with millions of incompatible migrants with the express intention of destroying the native culture and replacing it with something called a ‘multicultural society’.

They are conspiring with this foreign entity to surrender control of the British military to the same foreign tyranny.

This political elite has willfully committed treason by any measure and when justice finally prevails, they should suffer the traditional fate of traitors down the ages.  

Footnote:

On the 15^th October 1945 the former Prime Minister of France, Pierre Laval, was put up against a wall in Fresnes Prison in Paris and shot for treason. He was instrumental in running a puppet government in France on behalf of a foreign entity.

Nine days later on the 24^th October 1945 the former Prime Minster of Norway, Vidkun Quisling, was put up against a wall in Arkersus Fortress in Oslo and shot for treason. Like Pierre Laval he was instrumental in running a puppet government in Norway on behalf of a foreign entity. In both cases the foreign entity was Germany.

  

Angela Merkel To Stand Down – Don’t Bet On It

The spirits of the much-abused people of Europe were raised at the news that the disastrous reign of the mentally unstable German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, was finally over. It took the rape and murder of hundreds of Germans, and other European citizens, to bring them to their senses and muster up the courage to take decisive action and express their disapproval of her tyranny.

Before people get too carried away with their celebrations it must be understood that Merkel is a fanatic with an agenda who is also addicted to power. She is unlikely to relinquish this power easily and ride off into the sunset on account of something as mundane as an election.

Like the other European leaders Mrs. Merkel is a committed globalist who believes that the people are not qualified to decide how they are governed. This is made abundantly clear by the way that elections, referenda and mandates from the great unwashed are routinely ignored.

Like her notorious predecessor Mrs. Merkel’s mission in life is to realize the age-old dream of replacing the independent nation states of Europe with a single centrally controlled superstate dominated by Germany.

Mrs. Merkel stepping down as the leader of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) does not mean that she will abandon her dream for a Vichy-type Europe; far from it. She will arrange another platform or source of power with which to pursue it to its conclusion.

The initial euphoria at her supposed resignation dissipated quickly when it was realized that if she doesn't change her mind in the meantime she wasn't going anywhere until 2021. This leaves her plenty of time to organize another power base. If a week is a long time in politics, then three years is an eternity.

Two alternative power bases are the Presidencies of the all-powerful European Union Commission and the European Council. These will become available when the terms for the current incumbents end in 2019. These vacancies would be a shoo-in for the power-hungry Chancellor and an ideal opportunity for her to continue the destruction of the European nation states and their centuries old cultures.

Having power over the lives of 500 million people would not only satisfy her megalomaniac instincts but would hand her the power to finally achieve her dream of a German dominated United States of Europe.

Merkel is not the only politician that refuses to accept their time is up or to accept that the people have spoken against their perceived wisdom. Former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and John Major are back in the front line working hard to overturn the result of the Brexit referendum as is the former Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg.

Across the Atlantic, former President Barack Obama has returned from the political knacker’s yard to campaign against President Trump and the Republican Party. This PR manufactured phony President and hopeless narcissist could never resist an opportunity to sing his own praises and talk about his non-existent achievements.

In what has become a reason for both mirth and pity, a stake through the heart with a double garland of garlic around her severed neck won’t keep Hillary Clinton in the graveyard of failed politicians.  Such is her belief in her own political immortality, her Royal Ghoulship, accompanied by her predator husband, will never accept that her public life is over.

It seems like this ghost of elections past will keep haunting the American people for all eternity.

To conclude, Angela Merkel and the rest of these superannuated political has-beens should disappear from the public stage and enter holy orders to atone for the death and destruction they have wreaked upon the people of Europe and the world along with the other consequences of their disastrous tenures in office.  

The Working Class Can Kiss My Ass I've Joined The Ruling Class At Last.

                           
                   A picture gallery of Labour Party socialist hypocrites who sold out the working class

It was British journalist and author George Orwell who in his 1937 book The Road To Wigan Pier, took the view that upper class or bourgeoise socialists were soggy sentimentalists who were all for a classless society so long as they see the proletariat through the wrong end of the telescope; force them into any real contact with the proletariat and they retreat back into their inherent patronizing snobbishness.

Admire him or not he was prophetic as his other novels Animal Farm and 1984 attest. The worst kind of socialist in Orwell's mind was the trade union leader or labour representative who was elected into office to look after the interests and well being of his fellow workers only to join the class they have sworn an oath to fight, then go on to adopt their mannerisms and way of life.

This is certainly true in the case of the British Labour Party, many of whom swore by all that was holy that they would never sit with the upper class and the aristocracy in the hated House of Lords.

This institution is the upper chamber of British legislature which was once exclusively populated by Lords Temporal and Lords Spiritual; in other words hereditary Peers and Bishops. It was regarded by socialists and others as the bastion of Great Britain's class based society with its unearned privilege, patronage, inequality and injustice.

Considered to be an affront to democracy there were calls for the House of Lords to be elected in order to correct this democratic deficit or better still, abolished altogether. Politicians being the charlatans that they are chose to reform the chamber by phasing out hereditary Peers replacing them with appointed Life Peers. The Bishops and a rump of hereditary Peers were to remain for the time being.

This opened the door to corruption on a massive scale with Peerages being sold for hard cash and in return for favours, services rendered and party donations.

Appointments to the House of Lords are for life therefore they cannot be removed by the people using a democratic electoral process. These corruptocrats get a daily allowance of $390 per day just for crossing the threshold plus other expenses. They also enjoy taxpayer subsidised bars and restaurants until they shuffle off their mortal coils and climb aboard the great gravy train in the sky.

No self respecting socialist would have been seen dead in this place but a taxpayer funded sinecure with its rank and privileges far away from the great unwashed outweighs any socialist principles they once claimed to hold dear.

The following is a gallery of some of the worst hypocrites in the British Labour Party who wallowed in their socialist principles while it suited them then abandoned the working class for the aristocracy when they were of no further use.

Neil Kinnock, otherwise known as the Welsh Windbag, he is quoted as saying "The House of Lords must go - not be reformed, not be replaced, not be reformed in some nominated life-after-death patronage paradise, just closed down, abolished, finished". He was elected to represent the poor working class constituency of Bedwellty then Islwyn in South East Wales. A noted bloviator with few or no accomplishments he went on to become leader of the Labour Party where he was roundly defeated by Mrs. Thatcher not once but twice. The epitome of patronage, nepotism and corruption he spent 25 years as an MP, another 4 years as an EU Commissioner, 5 more years as the EU Commissioner for Admin Reform before being appointed to the House of Lords for life. This member of the new aristocracy labours under the title of Baron Kinnock of Bedwellty in the County of Gwent.

Michael Martin, otherwise known as 'Gorbals Mick' after a working class area of his native Glasgow. Martin was a trade unionist and Labour councillor before entering Parliament where he was eventually appointed Speaker of the House of Commons. This supposedly neutral Speaker was hopelessly biased and was forced to resign after being involved in an expenses scandal which cheated the taxpayer of the fruits of their labour. After 26 years as an Member of Parliament Gorbals Mick was 'elevated' to the new aristocracy in 2009 where he labours under the title of Baron Martin of Springburn in the City of Glasgow.

Alistair Darling, referred to as 'that bearded Trot' by the aforementioned Neil Kinnock.  Darling was a fully paid up member of the Loony Left and a supporter of the International Marxist Group. Privately educated, Darling was elected to the far-left Lothian Regional Council in Scotland in 1982 before entering Parliament in 1987. He reached the dizzy heights of Chancellor of the Exchequer before standing down after 28 years. This champagne socialist was 'elevated' to the new aristocracy in 2015 where he labours under the title of Baron Darling of Roulanish, Great Bernera in the County of Ross and Cromarty.

John Prescott, an ill tempered bruiser who started his political career as a trade union activist while working as a steward on cruise liners. He was elected to Parliament in 1970 and attained the position of Deputy Prime Minister to Tony Blair. Regarded as the representative of the working class and trade unionists in Tony Blair's reformed New Labour movement which saw the party move to the right. Prescott made himself a laughing stock when he admitted an affair with his diary secretary Tracy Temple who likened his tackle to a chipolata. After 40 years as a Member of Parliament he was 'elevated' to the new aristocracy in June 2010 and labours under the title of  Baron Prescott of Kingston upon Hull in the County of East Yorkshire.

Peter Mandelson, a self-serving, odious piece of work if ever there was one. This former member of the Young Communist League is competing with his former leader Tony Blair as the most obnoxious and hated figure in British political history. The original spin doctor and media manipulator, this charlatan along with Blair and others is responsible for dragging British politics and public life further down into the sewer from where it is yet to emerge. For some reason unknown to mankind Mandelson was handed immense power throughout his political career despite having to resign from the government twice due to accusations of corruption. After a controversial twelve year Parliamentary career he was appointed EU Commissioner for Trade where he made numerous contacts in the dodgy global business world including Russian oligarchs and other East European tyrants. This 'former' communist who loves the trappings of wealth and power was 'elevated' to the House of Lords in 2008 and labours under the very grandiose title of Lord Mandelson of Foy in the County Hereforshire and of Hartlepool in the County of Durham.

In the interests of diversity, inclusion, gender equality, multiculturalism and community cohesion we have Manzila Pola Uddin. A British documented Bangladeshi who's career as a community activist and politician has been mired in controversy and corruption throughout. Despite being as corrupt as any African kleptocrat, Manzila Uddin's gender, skin colour, religion and ethnicity made her the darling of the Labour Party and the 'progressive' multi-culti industry. Ignoring the fact that she robbed the taxpayer upward of some $200,000 by lying and cheating she remains in the Legislature to this day. She swindled the taxpayer by claiming her primary residence was an empty property she owned outside the designated residential area that entitles her to claim expenses and allowances. She actually lived in an a property close to Westminster which precluded these claims. By sheer coincidence she had a mansion built in her native Bangladesh to the value of approximately $200,000. Attempts by the Labour Party to get her elected to the House of Commons were unsuccessful so they appointed  her to the House of Lords instead where she labours under the title of Baroness Uddin of Bethnal Green in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.  

He has not been 'elevated' to the House of Lords just yet because this creature still harbours an ambition to lead the European Union as President. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair who famously declared to Labour Party icon and former leader, Michael Foot, that he came to socialism via Marxism used the contacts he made while in office to accumulate a personal fortune as opposed to alleviating the condition of the poor and downtrodden working class he claimed to champion. A narcissist of the very highest order this incarnation of pure evil is considered by many to be a war criminal after lying in order to lead Great Britain into an illegal war with Iraq. Apart from adding to his personal fortune Blair now spends his time and energy attempting to reverse the result of the Brexit referendum and keep Great Britain shackled to the failing and corrupt European Union he hopes one day to lead. Tony Blair is the ultimate champagne socialist and the final chapter of his treachery as yet to be written so this one will keep running for some time yet.

Brexit Day – Celebrating Freedom With A Picture Gallery

Since a picture speaks a thousand words I will celebrate the liberation of Great Britain from the European Union tyranny with a gallery of photographs that will warm the cockles of every freedom lover’s heart.

True Brit. Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage is the man who is largely responsible for the Brexit referendum. He was ridiculed and vilified for 25 years but his love of Great Britain saw him through. The man deserves a medal.

The German socialist Martin Schultz, Polish cry baby Donald Tusk and Jean-Claude Junker the Luxembourgian tax cheat.  The three unelected Presidents of the United States of Europe who are facing the collapse of their beloved project.

Sour Kraut. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, titular head of state of the EU empire lost to the British for the third time in a century.

A rare photograph of the French socialist President, Francois Hollande with his head on the outside of Mad Merkel's backside.

The evil genius and former Nazi George Soros, one of the leaders of the New World Order lamenting the millions he spent trying to destroy Great Britain.

Former President Barack Obama in happier times with the aforementioned evil genius, George Soros. Obama took time off from destroying America to campaign against the liberation of Great Britain,

War criminal and traitor Tony Blair who sold out the British people to endear himself to the EU bureaucrats. His campaign for the  Presidency of the EU Commission ended in failure.

And finally:

The mortal remains of Muslim terrorist Khalid Masood enroute to the mortuary.


                                                      Happy Brexit Day to all patriots

Fighting Brexit - Elite Choose The Evil One To Lead Their Campaign

When the millionaires and billionaires that form the global elite appointed former Prime Minister Tony Blair to lead their campaign to reverse the Brexit referendum result and keep Great Britain under the jackboot of the EU dictatorship, they put on display not only their contempt for democracy and the people but also how out of touch they are.

One would think that entrepreneurs and political movers and shakers such as George Soros, Richard Branson, Lord Mandelson etc. who have the expertise and talent to accumulate vast fortunes and political power for themselves would have chosen someone other than a pariah who ranks among the most hated people in the land.

If choosing Blair wasn’t insulting enough, their message that the people were lied to and not intelligent enough to understand the issue set their contempt in stone.

Accusing the Brexit campaign of lying and misleading the British people is the type of distortion we have come to expect from the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media whores, including the taxpayer funded BBC, who abuse their monopoly of news and information.

In a complete reversal of history it was the Remain campaign, universally known  as ‘Project Fear’, that was a deliberately manufactured tissue of lies and threats. Every prediction from economic Armageddon and four million lost jobs to the outbreak of World War III has failed to materialize since the British people chose freedom from the EU dictatorship.

On the contrary, as was predicted by the Brexit campaign, just the prospect of being free from the EU’s central command and control over borders and economic life has sent Great Britain’s economic indicators soaring to record levels.

The very idea of sending the man who consciously lied to take Great Britain into a disastrous war in Iraq to accuse the Brexit campaign of lying is beyond irony. The powerful elite are obviously not as clever as they make themselves out to be or what we give them credit for.

Ignoring the result of the Brexit referendum is not the first time Tony Blair has ignored the will of the people. Outside the political elite and those with a vested interest, opposition to his war in Iraq was total. He ignored petitions, campaigns and the biggest mass demonstration in history in order to rain death and destruction on Iraqi people.

When Blair talks about lies and distortions by the Brexit campaign,  people need to be reminded that his justification for killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, including women, children, the elderly, the sick and the infirm, was to find and destroy Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s).

What became known as the ‘Dodgy Dossier’ was a distortion of intelligence reports concerning Saddam’s capability to attack the west with WMD’s, which included the outrageous lie that he had the capability to attack Great Britain in as little time as forty-five minutes.

Rather than admit the truth, when WMD’s were proved to be non-existent, Blair’s justification for his war morphed into ‘regime change’ with the claim that the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein.

The world would be a better place without Kim Jong-un or Robert Mugabe, and a host of other blood-soaked dictators, so using the same justification North Korea and Zimbabwe should be bombed back to the stone-age forthwith.

Blair has attracted further opprobrium by masqueraded as a socialist to gain control over the Labour Party and the Premiership of Great Britain then ditching every principle he claimed he had to accumulate a personal fortune reputed to be in the tens of millions. Ditching also a long established code of ethics, he did this by using contacts he made during his time in office including with some of the worlds vilest dictators and oppressive regimes.

It’s worth mentioning at this point that Blair and his wife Cherie stand accused of being a double act when it comes to amassing their personal fortune. Using the name Cherie Booth she was instrumental in setting up Matrix Chambers to specialize in human rights cases just prior to her husband incorporating EU human rights law into British law. 

Whether this was a coincidence is open to debate but a fortune was made and it stinks to high Heaven; it only adds to the contempt that the people have not only for Tony Blair but for his spouse as well.

In conclusion, Tony Blair is a fanatical Europhile who makes no secret of the fact that he wants to see an independent, sovereign Great Britain become province of a United States of Europe ruled by foreign bureaucrats on behalf of the global elite.

This elite should have known that the vast majority of the British people consider Tony Blair to be evil personified, a war criminal that belongs in prison who they despise with a passion reserved only for history’s more unsavory characters.

By using the hated Tony Blair as their public face they have inadvertently damaged their own campaign and hopefully helped the Brexiteers to consign the EU to the dustbin of history where it so rightly belongs. 

Trump Wars Part I - Blair's Lies Handed Trump His Bush Ammunition

Donald Trump certainly lit the fuse and set off an explosive exchange during the Republican debate in South Carolina when he challenged the veracity of George W.  Bush's justification for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. If that wasn't bad enough he labelled him a liar without reservation. 

This is a serious charge and not to be made lightly, especially since both George W. and his father George H. W. have conducted themselves with quiet dignity since leaving office and in a State that thinks highly of the Bush family.

As an independent observer with no horse in the race and with experience of the political scene in Great Britain it's obvious that this was not a spontaneous ad hominem attack on the Bush dynasty but a well researched, calculated political manoeuvre by Trump and his campaign team.

It wouldn't be a surprise to discover that the Trump campaign researchers discovered that the publication of the Chilcott Inquiry into Great Britain's involvement in the Iraq war is imminent and would not be complimentary to Tony Blair and by extension President Bush.

The invasion of Iraq was widely unpopular in Great Britain where the controversy surrounding the justification continues to this day. The consensus is that Blair had promised President Bush British support for his Iraq military adventure, then manufactured the threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMD's) some time later as justification. He then embarked on a campaign of lying not only to Parliament but to the British people also.

Unfortunately for Blair the British people were not buying his narrative.

Such was the dissatisfaction with the official explanation for British involvement in Iraq the Chilcott Inquiry was set up in 2009 to investigate Blair and the government's behaviour in the lead up to war. The distrust of Blair and his government was such that the inquiry was dismissed as a whitewash before it even began its deliberations.

The controversy began with what is known as the September Dossier published in September 2002 on Iraq's WMD programs. Every single allegation contained in this report was later proven to be false.

Then came the Iraq Dossier from 2003, better known as the 'Dodgy Dossier', in which intelligence on Iraq's WMDs was falsified with further accusations that the dossier had been exaggerated or 'sexed up' by Blair's propaganda department to make matters appear worse than they were to justify war.

The final straw came when British WMD expert, Dr David Kelly, was found dead under mysterious circumstances after his name was leaked to the media as the 'Dodgy Dossier' whistleblower, supposedly by a Blair henchman, when he questioned the veracity of Blair's WMD claims.

This again required an inquiry because of accusations of a whitewash and an official cover-up. The Hutton Inquiry was initiated to investigate and came to the conclusion that Dr Kelly had committed suicide by cutting his wrists using a blunt penknife he had carried since boyhood leaving little or no blood at the scene.

Rightly or wrongly the court of public opinion decided otherwise and duly considered it as murder most foul with yet another Blair government cover-up.

It was also widely reported by the media that other UN weapons inspectors led by Hans Blix and Mohamed Al-Bradei also cast doubts on the government's WMD claims.
(See here)

What could prove to be most damaging to both Tony Blair and George W. Bush will be the wider dissemination of the 'Bush-Blair 2003 Iraq Memo' also known as the 'Manning Memo'. This was classified as extremely sensitive and contains details of a meeting between Bush and Blair where it becomes obvious to the reader that they had made the decision to invade Iraq regardless of whether Saddam had WMD's or not.
(See here and here)

The Manning Memo was leaked with a copy making it's way to the New York Times who confirmed it's authenticity.

The Chilcott inquiry has been ongoing for 7 years or so and has been plagued by delays and prevarication; this is blamed on the fear that publishing these and other communications between Blair and Bush would cause an irrevocable breach in US-British relations.

The publication of the Chilcott Inquiry will be political dynamite and one can imagine what ammunition it would have provided to Trump and his campaign team should Jeb Bush have remained in the race and continued attacking his adversary in the way he had been during the campaign. He wouldn't stand a chance against Trump armed with ammunition like the Chilcott Inquiry.

As events panned out Jeb Bush has suspended his election campaign therefore Trump has no need to raise this issue again unless the Bush family put their heads above the parapet and decide to campaign against him.

In conclusion it should be recognised that if the Trump campaign is so switched on and farsighted to the point where they can dig up a controversial issue from the past and use it as ammunition in the current election campaign, then Bill and Hillary Clinton's past will be very fertile ground indeed.

Unjust Geneva Convention - Soldier Rots In Prison Warmonger Stays Free

When it was revealed that Her Majesty's Shadow Secretary of Defence, Emily Thornberry, has received political donations from a dodgy law firm, Leigh Day, who scoured the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan searching for 'victims of abuse' supposedly perpetrated by British soldiers with a view to suing them, it raised the age old issue of what are acceptable or unacceptable actions during warfare.

(Dodgy law firm get busted here)

It came as news to millions of people, myself included, that there exists a 145-strong department called the Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) charged with investigating these allegations and who's caseload has exceeded 1,500 cases. The investigation into whether Iraqi's or Afghans were ill-treated or unlawfully killed by soldiers will drag on until 2019 at the earliest and cost at least
$88 million.

How that affects soldiers efficiency on the battlefield is anyone's guess but it can hardly be conducive to their morale.

Law firms like Leigh Day and the IHAT who together swim in the fetid swamp of the recently created human rights industry would serve justice better if they investigated with equal vigour those who send soldiers into battle in the first place.

The infamous case of jailed-for-life Royal Marine Sgt Alexander Blackman, previously designated Marine A and the man who got him involved the war, Prime Minister Tony Blair is a case in point.
(Marine A prosecution here)

No one could have put the issue in clearer language than author and journalist George Orwell who opined on the issue way back in 1943. It's worth quoting part of his article from his Tribune newspaper column, As I Please, to illustrate the point:

"I note the surprise with which many people seem to discover that war is not a crime. Hitler, it appears, has not done anything actionable. He has not raped anybody, nor carried off any pieces of loot with his own hands, nor personally flogged any prisoners, buried any wounded men alive, thrown any babies into the air and spitted them on his bayonet, dipped any nuns in petrol and touched them off with church tapers - in fact he has not done any of the things which any enemy nationals are credited with doing in war-time. He has merely precipitated a world war which will have cost twenty million lives before it ends. And there's nothing illegal in that".

Since this was written the Geneva and Hague Conventions have been updated and re-written to clarify the laws of war with the noble intention of protecting prisoners and non-combatants among a myriad of other things.

In light of the fact that the war which resulted in Sgt Blackman being jailed for finishing off a fatally wounded Taliban terrorist was justified by Tony Blair using doctored intelligence reports and outright lies and also by the fact that he is free as a bird, it is abundantly clear that the Geneva and Hague Conventions make the serving soldier doing what he is trained to do liable to prosecution while absolving the warmonger from any responsibility or guilt whatsoever.

Blair lied to Parliament and along with his communications chief Alastair Campbell deliberately 'sexed up' the dossier on weapons of mass destruction and other matters in order to justify waging war on Iraq which posed no threat to Great Britain or it's people.
( One dodgy dossier story here)

In the context of Orwell's quote Tony Blair was party to precipitating a war which has so far cost the lives of anywhere between two-hundred thousand and a million souls, most of them civilians and it appears he has done nothing illegal.

Blair's actions have not  justified prosecution under the Geneva and Hague Conventions therefore they are not fit for purpose and consequently they should be considered invalid for deciding guilt for the causes and actions in modern international armed conflicts.

It must also be acknowledged that in addition to the appalling casualties resulting from Blair's war it has also precipitated the rise of ISIS which in turn has resulted in murder and mayhem across the world and a further untold increase in casualties.

Orwell ended his article thus:

"Nevertheless, a world in which it is wrong to murder an individual civilian and right to drop a thousand tons of high explosive on a residential area does sometimes make me wonder whether this earth of ours is not a loony-bin made use of by some other planet".

In conclusion, Sgt Blackman's action of dispatching a single terrorist to claim his virgins in paradise was done under unimaginable stress in the heat of battle and is trivial compared to horrendous casualties caused by the illegal actions of Tony Blair which were decided at his leisure with no stress at all.

Sgt Blackman is a hero who did what he was trained to do and therefore he should be released forthwith with his rank and benefits restored.
   

Michelle Obama's London Visit Was A Calculated Insult

Being America's first black/white mixed race President, Barack Obama was in an ideal position to heal the wounds of racial division not only in the United States but across the world. Tragically, he and his administration threw that opportunity away in order to exploit the latent racial animosity between communities and deepen the divisions as a means of imposing their 'progressive' ideology.

His own personal animosity toward Great Britain and it's people is palpable and this is supposedly driven by abuse metered out to his late father by the colonial administration in Kenya during colonial days.

Even the briefest investigation reveals that the only abuse meted out to Obama Senior was by Kenya's first President and dictator, Jomo Kenyatta, who prevented him from making a living on his return from the USA thus sending him over the edge into alcoholism.

Michelle Obama admitted that the first time in her life she was proud to be an American was after the election of her husband to the Presidency. If that was her sentiment toward her own country which has afforded her the opportunity to become rich beyond the dreams of millions of her compatriots and finally make it to the White House, then Great Britain has no chance of getting her respect.

Her latest jolly abroad, billed as a two day whistle stop tour to the UK to promote her girls education initiative, 'Let Girls Learn', consisted of a visit to a segregated girls school in the notoriously corrupt Bangladeshi ghetto of Tower Hamlets. Avoiding the possibility of meeting any real British people, her 'tour' also consisted of a visit to Prime Minister David Cameron at No 10 Downing Street and tea with Prince Harry at Kensington Palace.

Her speech to the pupils at the Mulberry Schools for Girls was not only an exercise in the Obama administrations deeply ingrained policy of victimology but also a calculated insult to the British people.

In view of her status as First Lady of the United States we can allow her a little licence to fabricate but her assertion that 'she sees herself when she looks out at all these young women' is dishonest in the extreme, while her claim that 'their story is her story' would suggest that she too was raised wearing a hijab in a male dominated Muslim ghetto or something similar.

This visit and the subsequent speech by Michelle Obama was a conscious attempt to portray Tower Hamlets as representative of Great Britain as a whole as well as portraying the inhabitants as disadvantaged by their skin colour and religious beliefs by an institutionally racist population.

The truth is that these girls are victimised and disadvantaged not by institutionalised British racism but by their own parents and their institutionally misogynistic anti-western Muslim community.

The people of this community had all the advantages of any other British citizen when they or their parents emigrated from Bangladesh. Instead they decided to ignore the advantages of freedom and individual liberty in an open society but went on to replicate the the country they left behind instead, warts and all.

The girls that Michelle Obama identifies with, and their parents, consider themselves to be Bangladeshi not British, they live their lives according to Bangladeshi culture and Islam while despising British culture and its way of life.

Unfortunately these girls will most likely end up married to an older relative from rural Bangladesh, confined inside the home with no rights whatsoever let alone women's rights. In a worst case scenario they may suffer genital mutilation or end up fulfilling their dreams like many other young 'British' schools girls by eloping to Syria in order to become jihadi brides for ISIS killers.

Michelle Obama could have made the effort to visit the outstanding Middle Rasen Primary School in rural Lincolnshire and offer her congratulations to the pupils and staff for their outstanding academic achievement. This school is an excellent example of what can be achieved when young people are not encumbered by 'progressives' with imposed 'multi-culturalism or Islam.

It's worth mentioning in passing that academic excellence is now frowned upon by the new breed of 'progressive' school inspectors and as a consequence the Middle Rasen Primary School has been denied the top award on account it is too English or not multi-cultural enough.
(Read the shocking story here)

Alternatively, Mrs Obama could have visited the schools used by her fellow 'progresssive' Tony Blair; the former Prime Minister of Great Britain who famously proclaimed that he "came to socialism via Marxism" who happened to be the person responsible for opening the borders to mass immigration from the undeveloped world including Bangladesh.

As a matter of ideological principle Blair opposed the private and selective education system in favour of the dumbed down state system whereby the all-must-have-prizes mentality has disastrously degraded education performance. Except for his own sons that is....after the proclamation by his Labour Party that they "didn't do God" Blair suddenly became a Roman Catholic in order that his sons could attend the much sought after, and selective, London Oratory faith school.

He could have practiced himself what he preached to the British people but obviously dumbed down schools are for the victims of socialism not its prophets.

Its worth noting in conclusion that Great Britain's most notorious race baiter, the Member of Parliament for  Hackney North and Stoke Newington, Dianne Abbot, is like Blair, a passionate campaigner against private education........except for her own son who attended the fee paying City of London School.

Dianne Abbot styles herself as Afro-Caribbean as opposed to British who's anti-white sentiments and rhetoric would make her a shoe-in for a Barack Obama advisor on race along with the Reverends Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Jeremiah Wright.

Great Britain under Blair, Brown and now Cameron has been fundamentally transformed for the worse and is now resembling a third world nation which is descending further into mediocrity with every year that passes.

Its disheartening to note that under the Obama administration, with Michelle in tow, the United States is going the same way and when it does the last hope for the world is extinguished. Lets hope and pray that the American people come to their senses and bring their political class to heel, something their trans-Atlantic cousins studiously failed to do.

Must read Richard Littlejohn column here.

The Human Rights Industry - Rewarding The Guilty, Punishing The Innocent

It is now accepted as fact that every thought, word and deed of the modern political class is meticulously calculated to further their ideological agenda as opposed to ensuring the security and prosperity of their citizens.

On the contrary, in many cases this well-being is negatively affected as they impose their ideologically driven agenda on their distracted citizens.

The cynical use of universal human rights to further their agenda is one such issue that is exposed under even the most superficial scrutiny.

The idea that the 'progressive' global political elite along with the career bureaucrats of the UN/EU actually care about the condition of billions of people around the world is as preposterous as it is false. Only these elitists could justify imposing strict human rights requirements on the free democracies of the developed world while sucking up to, and doing lucrative business with the planet's most tyrannical totalitarian dictators.

The incorporation of European human rights laws into British law in 1998 by the Blair government is a classic example of agenda driven politicians cynically using historical horrors such as National Socialism and the Holocaust to progress the EU superstate agenda while amassing personal fortunes in the process.

The Council of Europe instituted the European Convention On Human Rights (ECHR) in 1953 in the aftermath of World War II with the intention of preventing the rise of regimes such as the Third Reich. But like all well intentioned projects it has been seized upon by an unscrupulous political class and used as a tool impose the EU agenda.

Great Britain was already a signatory to the ECHR and showing no signs of developing into a Nazi regime when the Convention laws were incorporated into British law. Despite the British having a centuries long history of developing liberties and individual freedoms this incorporation was solely designed to achieve the supremacy of EU law over British law - the supremacy of unelected EU bureaucrats over British judges and elected Parliamentarians.

Traditional British liberty and individual freedoms didn't begin in 1998 but began to coalesce as far back as 893AD when King Alfred the Great began codifying English laws. With a few ups and downs in between, it culminated in the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215. This was amended and modified over the centuries resulting in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, Bill of Rights of 1689, the Act of Settlement of 1701.

These documents are accepted to be the inspiration behind the founding documents of the United States of America, namely the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Without a shadow of doubt the incorporation of the ECHR into British law has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and a boon for every foreign terrorist, murderer, rapist and violent criminal that makes it onto the British mainland in addition to being a money maker for the human rights industry; an industry stuffed with money grubbing lawyers that has grown out of all proportion to any actual demand from the British people.

It is worth noting at this point that Matrix Chambers was set up by Cherie Blair, wife of then Prime Minister Tony Blair, in April 2000 in order to cash in on this new human rights industry which exploded onto the scene in the aftermath of the ECHR incorporation.

Any attempt by the British Home Secretary to deport the above mentioned foreign terrorists, murderers, rapists and thousands of violent criminals are thwarted by the politically motivated bureaucrats that sit in judgement in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France.

Furthermore they often award thousands of pounds of taxpayer money in 'compensation' if these dangerous criminals are not released onto the streets while awaiting judgement.

By his actions Tony Blair has demonstrated that he has no concern for human rights whatsoever; a venal operator who cynically used the issue to impose his Europhile agenda and make a personal fortune in the process. Since he incorporated ECHR into British law he has bombed and otherwise been instrumental in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians during the course of his illegal war. He has lucrative dealings with blood-soaked tyrants from the former Soviet republics as well as having had cordial relations with Colonel 'Mad Dog' Qaddafi of Libya.

While the UN/EU bureaucrats take the bastions of individual liberty such as Great Britain, America and Israel to task for supposed human rights abuses, they refuse to give equal concern to the serial human rights abusers of China, the decades long dictatorships of Africa, the Muslim tyrannies of the Middle East along with the socialist/communist dystopias of Central and South America.

As previously noted, human rights in Great Britain only apply to foreign terrorists and criminals who are trying to avoid deportation, they don't apply to the tens of thousands of under age white girls who were systematically groomed then raped and pimped out by Muslim paedophile gangs with the tacit approval of the government and it agents.

They don't apply to law abiding citizens who innocently go about their business and end up dead or victims of violent career criminal gangs who were allowed entry into the country unchecked and cannot be removed because of their 'human rights'.

In the run-up to recent election Prime Minister Cameron promised to correct this abomination but as ECHR is a requirement of EU membership and he remains committed to the United States of Europe the British people will continue to be denied their human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


   

Why Fundamentally Transform The Country You Love?

In 2008 when candidate Obama first informed the American people that he was "five days away from fundamentally transforming America" the British people had already suffered a decade of fundamental transformation under their own photogenic, media created leader Tony Blair.

Unlike the British people who had no idea of what was coming, the American people were warned in advance that their prospective leader had seriously malign intentions for their country. What on earth did the people think he meant by fundamental transformation?

The American people also had the bitter experience of their trans-Atlantic cousins to draw on as a living, breathing example of what fundamental transformation looks like in practice.

Had they looked at their cousins over the pond they would have seen a reasonably prosperous country, where the majority went about their lives without let or hindrance, transformed into a bankrupt, government dominated bureaucracy bloated by agenda driven political operatives and their army of useful idiots looking for kudos and a taxpayer funded free lunch.

In addition to this they would have witnessed the free enterprise economy and a culture of individual liberty replaced by expanded welfare entitlements and increased dependency. This horror was accompanied by the creeping interference of petty government bureaucrats into the minutiae of peoples lives.

Blair's government continued the policy of previous governments by transferring swathes of sovereignty from the elected representatives in the Westminster Parliament to the unelected, bureaucrats of the European Union in Brussels.

The British people are no longer self governing, they no longer have control over their borders and for all intents and purposes Great Britain no longer exists as one of the worlds independent nations. It's integration into the European Union federal state means it has been effectively dissolved in all but name.

Most sadly, Americans looking across the Atlantic would have witnessed British culture, the British way of life and its Judeo-Christian heritage that had evolved over two millenia, systematically erased with its symbols of nationhood banned. Supposedly this was for fear of offending imported alien cultures, but in reality it was an important part of the cultural replacement agenda.

The Great Britain of today no longer resembles the country of two decades ago; it is more akin to a third world developing nation with crumbling infrastructure and where public services such housing, education, transport and health care provision are unable to cope with the expansion of the imported dependent population.

Prior to their election to office, Tony Blair and his party professed their love of country, people and way of life; they claim they only want to do whats best for the people. One can only say that wrecking the country, fundamentally transforming it into a third world equivalent then organising it's dissolution is an odd way of displaying affection.

There was uproar in the media recently when former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, stated that he didn't believe President Obama loved America; looking at the state of America today, was Giuliani wrong?

The United States of America became the greatest nation earth because of its free enterprise system, its culture of individual liberty and its constitutionally limited government. American exceptionalism has created more prosperity for more people than any other country in history. It has sacrificed its sons and daughters so others may enjoy the same freedom and prosperity if they so desire.

It is the shining city on a hill that is the hope and aspiration for millions who are denied freedom and prosperity, so why in God's name would anyone want it fundamentally transformed and more importantly, into what?