Hate Speech - Police Interfere in an Election Campaign

The intervention of a senior police officer into the European elections should be a great cause for concern for everyone who cherishes liberty, democracy and the inalienable rights endowed upon them by their Creator.

Assistant Chief Constable, Mark Hamilton, pictured above, has taken it upon himself to warn candidates to watch what they say during the European election campaign to avoid stoking racial hatred.

During an election campaign his duties as a police officer are to make sure the candidates are able to make their arguments in any way they choose without intimidation, physical or otherwise, and not advise them what they can and cannot say or the manner in which can they say it.

Outwardly Mr. Hamilton masquerades as a police officer but his comments and his job title reveal that he is an active political operative with an agenda to impose.

Assistant Chief Constable Hamilton is the National Police Chiefs Council Lead for hate crimes which is a political role if ever there was one. His job is not serving and protecting the public by applying the law equally and without favour but to impose the governments progressive agenda by rigidly policing political correctness depending on which community is involved.

Being a fully-fledged agent of the state and the ruling political class, his remarks are not aimed at the establishment Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat candidates but those who are posing a threat to the current political order and the status quo.

The Brexit Party and the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip) are campaigning to change the current political order because they have refused to implement the result of the Brexit referendum and leave the European Union.

The political class are fighting back against the people using everything in their power, and every dirty trick in the book, to prevent Great Britain leaving the EU. That means using the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media and the politicized institutions of the state, including the police ‘service’.

Ukip have always been smeared by the establishment as far-right, xenophobic, racist bigots who stir up hatred against Europe and immigrants. This deliberately misleading line of attack has been extended to the newly minted Brexit Party and anyone else who wants to leave the European Union.

This scurrilous campaign of denigration is used to generate fear and hatred of those who want to leave the European Union and is therefore hate speech by any description.  

In an overtly party political and knowingly false statement, Chief Constable Hamilton told the left-wing Observer newspaper that “tensions are being stoked on a national level around our relationship with Europe, about cultural identity and about immigration more broadly”.

It doesn't take a genius to work that these remarks stoke up tension and are aimed at Ukip, the Brexit Party and anyone else who wants to leave the European Union.

Although they would like it to be otherwise, the Brexit Party and Ukip campaigns are centered around the failure of the duplicitous political class to implement the result of the Brexit referendum and not our relationship with Europe, cultural identity or immigration.

Deliberately ignored by the establishment, along with the media and Chief Constable Hamilton, both of these parties have made it abundantly clear that this election is as much about democracy as it is about leaving the European Union.

The only hate and violence during the campaign so far has come from those wanting to remain in the European Union who disrupt Brexit Party campaign events and assault its leader.

In another incident the police ‘service’ stood by and allowed a gang of Muslim thugs to attack and assault a legal campaign rally being held by candidate Tommy Robinson in Oldham, England. (See here)

This is the same police service that initiated an investigation because someone called the pro EU candidate, Anna Soubry, a nasty name.

With the advent of ill-defined hate speech and hate crimes the political class have given agents of the state like Chief Constable Hamilton the authority to police language with the intention of ending the British peoples inalienable right to speak freely and to publicly express their opinions.

Policing language is the precursor to policing thought itself so if Great Britain wants to remain a land of individual liberty and democracy agents of the state like Chief Constable Hamilton need to be removed from power along with the political overlords who put him there.

Politicians should tone down Euro vote speeches

   

Anatomy Of A Stitch-Up – How The Elite Will Beat The British People

The ongoing campaign by the global elite to remove the duly elected President of the United States from office is nothing other than a coup d’état, it is also a clear indication that they have no respect for the American people or for democracy.

Likewise is the campaign to prevent Great Britain from leaving the European Union (EU) by the same global elite. They are on record as saying that the British people should not have been allowed a referendum on EU membership in first place but since they have and voted to leave the result should be overturned or simply ignored.

The slow motion coup d’état in the US is easy to follow as the political establishment in tandem with the main stream media and anyone else with an iota of power or influence, such as Hollywood celebrities and football players, constantly attack President Trump and the traditional America he represents.

In addition, Congress refuses to implement the agenda President Trump was elected to carry out while the George Soros funded army of communist thugs take the campaign onto the streets and into the campuses.

The campaign to reverse Brexit and keep Great Britain shackled to the EU may not be as easy to follow. The British section of the ruling elite also use the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media to disseminate its propaganda but they use the totally corrupted government machine and the politicized establishment in a more deceitful manner.

They use these instruments of the state to disguise their true motives by deceiving the public into thinking they are acting in their interests while covertly implementing their own long planned agenda.

It’s worth the reader persevering with this explanation to see the methodology they employ to impose their agenda on the nation and also to see what duplicitous, lying charlatans they really are.

After resisting the call for 30 years or more, the political elite conceded a referendum on EU membership for two primary reasons:

a) To stop the inexorable rise the anti-EU United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip) which threatened their stranglehold on political power.

b) They were convinced that with all the resources available to them they would win it and close down the generational EU membership debate once and for all.

Such was their determination to win the referendum and keep their United States of Europe project on track, the ruling elite and their EU surrogates, including the overwhelmingly Europhile British Parliament, unleashed every resource at their disposal with a ferocity not seen in any previous election campaign.

This included unlimited sums of money, the taxpayer funded BBC and the rest of the mainstream media, government departments, public institutions, the business community, the celebrity community, the Bank of England, the devolved governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland etc. etc.

Despite this being a strictly internal domestic affair, international globalist controlled organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN) and the EU itself weighed in on behalf of the Remain campaign.

They even co-opted the services of US President Barack Obama to interfere in this internal, domestic affair to issue threats and forecasts of doom. This intervention by the world’s most notorious international conman had the unintended consequence of pissing off thousands of undecided voters who joined the Brexit side.

The consequences of voting for Brexit were made abundantly clear by both sides. It would mean Great Britain leaving the EU single market and regaining control of her borders, including its fishing grounds; it would mean leaving the Customs Union allowing the British free to negotiate their own trade deals with the rest of the world; it would mean leaving the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice making British law supreme and it would mean a halt to the payment of billions of pounds per year in membership contributions.

These were absolute red lines for the British people and therefore not negotiable. These same issues are known as the four pillars of the EU and constitute the foundations of the United States of Europe project; consequently these are non-negotiable red lines for the global elite and their surrogates including the overwhelmingly Europhile British Parliament.

 

As was the case with the Presidential election on November 8^th where the American people knew exactly what they were voting for when they elected Donald J Trump, the British people knew exactly what they were voting for on June 23^rd 2016 when they voted to leave the European Union.

The battle lines were drawn with the people and their red lines on one side and the global elite with the same red lines on the other. Armed with the biggest mandate in British electoral history one would have thought that the people would win this battle at a canter but this is not so.

From June 24^th onward the campaign to ignore the will of the people kicked into gear and the project to keep Great Britain shackled to the corrupt and failing EU began.

Apart from the massive, ongoing propaganda campaign claiming that the people were lied to therefore there must be a second referendum, the deceit started with the “Brexit means Brexit” mantra being repeated ad nauseum by the British Prime Minister, Theresa May.

 The truth is that ‘Brexit in name only’ was and remains the true objective of this life-long Europhile and the overwhelmingly Europhile British Parliament.

Along with the ‘Brexit means Brexit’ mantra, Mrs. May also repeated ad nauseum that she was going to negotiate “the best possible deal for Britain”. Once these two slogans were embedded into the minds of the British people the latter mantra morphed into ‘the best possible deal for Britain and the EU’.

This subtle change of language opened the door to concessions on the people’s red lines - in effect a Brexit in name only, which would then be aggressively sold to the British public as the ‘best possible deal for Britain’.

What followed next was as subtle as a flying house brick to those versed in political deceit and exposes Theresa May and the rest of the swamp creatures in Parliament for the duplicitous, lying charlatans they really are.

After prevaricating for almost a year, which allowed the courts to adjudicate that the Europhile Parliament must approve or reject the final deal, Mrs. May finally triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. This started a two-year leaving process, the completion of which would make it almost three years since the British voted to leave the federal superstate project.

Since the triggering of Article 50 the British public have been drip fed headlines by the compliant mainstream media and the government propaganda machine to soften them up in preparation for the twist in the planned stitch-up we knew was coming.

It was being hinted at that concessions on the peoples’ red lines would have to be made in order to secure ‘the best possible deal for Great Britain and the EU’.

Britain considers giving EU 'oversight' over UK borders for market access after Brexit

Britain could pay to be in the Customs Union until 2022

UK fishermen may not win waters back after Brexit

Ministers signal borders will stay open for 5 years after Brexit

UK government concedes transitional role for European Court of Justice after Brexit

Theresa May reveals UK may still fund EU programs after Brexit

It came as no surprise to seasoned swamp watchers that only nine months into the two year negotiation Prime Minister May announced that a further ‘transitional’ or ‘implementation’ period will be required at the end of the negotiation which could last two years or longer as required.

As indicated in the headlines above, at the commencement of this transitional period Great Britain will have officially left the EU but would still be bound by the four pillars of the EU that were absolute red lines for the British people, i.e. they will remain in the single market leaving control of Great Britain’s borders and fishing grounds to the EU bureaucrats; they will remain in the Customs Union which prevents the signing of trade deals outside of the EU and they will remain subject to the European Court of Justice and its supremacy over British law.

To rub salt into the gaping wounds of this deception it means continued payments of billions of pounds of taxpayer’s money to the EU which is so mired in corruption it has not had its accounts signed off by the auditors for almost two decades.

This is the Brexit in name only that the British people were warned about by Eurosceptics such as Ukip and other committed Brexiteers including your humble correspondent.

Brexit - Keep The Champagne On Ice Its A Long Way From Done - written on June 30th, 5 days after the referendum.

Brexit Wars - The Empire Strikes Back - written on July 11th, 18 days after the referendum.

In summary it means that the official leaving date will be March 19^th 2019 but the actual leaving date will be circa 2021/22 at the earliest, a full 5 or 6 years after the referendum. It is more than obvious that the transitional period can and will be extended indefinitely under the pretext that the country, including the business community are not ready and need more time to adjust.

It is the official policy of Her Majesty’s Opposition in Parliament, the communist controlled Labour Party, that the transitional period is made permanent.

In conclusion, the world is dynamic and constantly changing; it will not stand still and put its affairs on hold waiting for 5 or 6 years for Prime Minister Theresa May to leave the EU and start engaging.  It will move on without Great Britain; trade deals with the worlds’ largest and fastest growing economies that are available today may not be available next week let alone in 5 or 6 years’ time.

This prevarication and rolling delay was the plan from the beginning designed specifically to keep Great Britain shackled to the EU ad infinitum or until the corrupt and failing oligarchy comes crashing down taking the British people with it.

      

Brexit In Danger - Europhile PM Theresa May Is Maneuvering To Remain

It's been over seventy days since the British people defied the establishment by voting overwhelmingly to take back the governance of their country from the corrupt political elites based in London, Brussels and New York.

In those seventy days nothing has changed; fifty-five million GBP is still being paid into the EU coffers every day with open border mass immigration and job killing regulations continuing unabated.

All the British people have had from the government so far is the meaningless soundbite 'Brexit means Brexit' repeated ad nauseum combined with endless prevarication and delay.

The result of the Brexit referendum was unequivocal and it was even more remarkable when one considers the campaign to Remain, labelled 'Project Fear', was an appalling tissue of lies and incessant black propaganda designed to stir up hatred and fear in equal measure.

As it stands the result has sent a resounding message to the political elite; some sources are suggesting that had the media been fair and balanced and resources more equal, the margin of victory would have been much larger.

The resignation of disgraced Prime Minster, David Cameron, along with his henchman and Chancellor, George Osborne, paved the way for Theresa May to assume the Premiership and lead the nation out of the increasingly authoritarian and corrupt EU and into the world at large.

The problem for the British people is that Theresa May is herself a life long Europhile and a participant in Project Fear. Europhiles are notorious for being fanatically dedicated to the United States of Europe project so it would take a 'road to Damascus' conversion for Mrs. May to suddenly embrace Brexit.

Since her coronation as Prime Minister - she was not elected by popular vote but appointed by her overwhelmingly Europhile party - Mrs. May has done nothing to progress the Brexit procedure or to convince the British people she is serious about fulfilling her mandate.

Her first action was to form a government consisting of eighteen Europhiles and only four Brexit supporters, one of which has sat on both sides of the European Union fence.

Her subsequent actions did not inspire confidence either; a visit to the fanatical Europhile leader of the Scottish Nationalists, Nicola Sturgeon and secondly a visit to the obviously unstable Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, who graciously took time off from destroying European civilization to grant her an audience.

After their respective meetings with Mrs. May both these leaders felt confident enough to be dictating the terms of the Brexit negotiations and what Great Britain's future relationship with Europe will be. In addition Ms. Sturgeon announced that she would have a veto over whether Brexit actually happens or not.

"Brexit means Brexit" was Mrs. May's only response.

Mrs. May initially announced that the two year long procedure to leave the EU, known as Article 50, will not be triggered any time soon. This was modified to early next year and modified again until after the French general election which is scheduled for May 2017.

Mrs. May's commitment to Brexit was put further into doubt when members of her government suggested that Article 50 should be delayed until after the German general election which takes place in August 2017. Apparently this is so her Brexit teams will know who they will be negotiating with.

In a display of utter contempt for the British people, especially the seventeen million voters who voted for Brexit, Mrs. May has announced that aforementioned Europhile, Nicola Sturgeon will have a seat at the negotiating table along with one of the architects of Project Fear and George Osborne henchman, James Chapman. (See here and here)

Noticeably absent from Mr's May's Brexit teams are anyone from the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip) who were responsible for getting the referendum in the first place and achieving the successful Brexit vote.

Many of these pro-British politicians, including their leader Nigel Farage, have been dealing with the EU bureaucrats for decades and subsequently they know the intricacies of EU procedures and operations. This knowledge is invaluable and their experience should make them an automatic choice.

Instead Mrs. May and her teams are using career civil servants who themselves are obsessive Europhiles.

In the meantime while Mrs. May deliberately prevaricates and delays the Brexit process, Project Fear is continuing apace with the taxpayer funded BBC leading the mainstream media charge. Every negative topic from so called racism and mythical hate crimes to beer prices and climate change are being blamed on Brexit.

In an act of jaw dropping imbecility Labour elder stateswomen, Baroness Tessa Jowell, even claimed that the Olympic medal count at the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games will collapse due to Brexit. (See here)

Unfortunately, unrelenting propaganda is effective and the longer people are exposed to it the likelihood of them being persuaded to change their minds is vastly increased.

To sum up: Knowing the duplicitous nature of the modern political class combined with their ruthless dedication to their agenda, it is not beyond belief that Mrs. May is engineering a fix for Great Britain to remain entwined with the EU in some shape or form.

It doesn't take a genius to understand that prevarication and delays for another two years without a moratorium on fees, immigration and regulations will make Brexit more complex and therefore more difficult to achieve.

All the indications are that Great Britain is booming with a bright future ahead while the EU is collapsing into poverty and chaos before our very eyes. Further prevarication will only damage the country further so there can be no justifiable reason to delay initiating Article 50 any longer.

Mrs. May and the Europhiles will never willingly abandon the EU project and definitely not for referendum vote.

A stitch-up comprising of a looser arrangement whereby access to the single market will be agreed for a fee and a minor time limited concession on mass immigration. All this of course can be revised at some point in the future when the project can be resumed and the goal of a post democratic superstate finally realized.

Trumped - David Cameron And His Referendum Stitch-Up Is Exposed

If anyone has any lingering doubts that the current leadership of the political class are nothing more than puppets who have been meticulously trained in the dark arts of media manipulation and propaganda, then I suggest they follow the antics of British Prime Minister, David Cameron, as he continues with his EU re-negotiation/referendum confidence trick despite the fact that he's been rumbled.

Watching the carefully choreographed campaigns of the establishment controlled political class in the United States getting derailed by Donald Trump is a wonder to behold; watching the apoplexy of the useful idiots in the government-media axis is an even bigger source of amusement.

This includes Megyn Kelly and Dana Perino of Fox News, who can hardly contain their contempt for Trump largely because of his exposure of their preferred candidate, Jeb Bush, as nothing other than a bought-and-paid-for establishment puppet.

Fair and Balanced? You report we decide? You reported and we decided - with a few exceptions Fox News is just as biased toward the political establishment as the other networks.

For a little while at least, everything was going swimmingly; the meticulously planned, pre-packaged campaign strategies of the establishment candidates were seducing the electorate into believing that the fundamentally transformed and downgraded America is still exceptional.

Issues that were degrading life for ordinary Americans, such as being beaten, raped, robbed and murdered by illegal immigrants, along with continued impoverishment by joblessness etc. were being glossed over or brushed under the carpet until the explosive arrival of Donald Trump on the scene.

It is true that the issue of illegal immigration, and the horrific crimes committed by illegals, would not have the high profile it has in the campaign were it not for Trump; neither would the issue of sealing the porous border. The establishment and their candidates were preparing the collective American psych for an amnesty for all illegals thus changing the demographic and cultural balance for ever.

In other words, making the fundamental transformation of America permanent and irreversible.

It would appear that the Trump anti-establishment phenomenon has contributed to the awakening of the British people from their media induced slumber and opened their eyes to the dishonest and treacherous machinations of their own agenda driven political class.

Thanks to Donald Trump, and to a lesser extent the anti-establishment Labour Party leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn, it is becoming almost fashionable to confront, disbelieve and ridicule the political establishment. At long last the people are beginning to accept that politicians routinely lie without conscience and deceive as a matter of course.

Apart from the increasingly popular United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), and their leader, Nigel Farage, the British political class is totally owned and run by the EU controlled establishment.

All the main parties are committed to the post-democratic European superstate project, an important part of which is the cultural and demographic replacement of existing societies - referred to in the USA as a 'fundamental transformation' - using open border mass immigration, particularly from the undeveloped, uncivilised third world.

To say that the British people have been lied to about the true nature of the European project would be the understatement of the century. Lied to, not just by the government of Edward Heath who signed the original surrender document, but by successive generations of all parties right up to David Cameron today.

These charlatans have been consistent with the lie that surrendering the power loaned to them after an election to unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats is in the British people's best interests.
(Great article on EU deceit by Christopher Booker here)

Knowing that the replacement of the independent sovereign states of Europe with a post democratic superstate would be unacceptable to the various indigenous people, it was to be achieved "without the peoples of Europe realising what was happening, the plan was to be accomplished in successive steps. Each was to be disguised has having an economic purpose, but all, taken together, would irrevocably and irreversibly lead to federation". 

This quote has been attributed to EU founder Jean Monet and is now in dispute; what is not in dispute however is that the agenda and sentiments contained therein have been carried out to the letter; it is indisputable that the British people are still being lied to with reference to the EU by the establishment owned political class, including Prime Minister David Cameron.

David Cameron is the archetypal politician for the post democratic era; hailing from a remote elite, he was exclusively educated and he has never had a proper job in the real world inhabited by real people.

He has adopted the modus operandi of the career politician of saying one thing to one client group and something completely opposite to another, as well as lying through his back teeth to get elected. This is considered to be acceptable behavior by modern day career politicians but it will only last if people like Trump and Corbyn stay silent and allow them to get away with it.

Having complete and utter contempt for the people he is supposedly representing, along with their views, their hopes and their aspirations, is another essential virtue for career politicians of the Cameron ilk.

It is universally acceptance by all and sundry that there will be no re-negotiation of Great Britain's terms of membership nor any repatriation of already surrendered powers. That includes border control, immigration and asylum policy, control over welfare, taxation or the criminal justice system; David Cameron still insists on carrying on with the re-negotiation charade.

Cameron has re-iterated his absolute commitment to the EU superstate project and will not campaign for Great Britain's exit even if his own negotiation ends in failure. This position is not just amateurish but untenable and an indication Cameron's confidence that he can con the British people into remaining in the United States of Europe.

Cameron's referendum stitch-up is now being seen for the charade that it really is by an increasing number of cynical observers who are returning the contempt that Cameron has for them but in spades.

It has now been revealed that Cameron and his controllers are going to orchestrate a phony bust-up with the French, who will then appear to concede some reforms; these will be nothing other than meaningless window dressing designed to con the British people.

The phony bust-up will, of course, be portrayed by the bought-and-paid-for main stream media as a victory for Cameron over Great Britain's historic and traditional enemy in a cynical attempt to play on the people's sense of patriotism and garner a few more votes for his dishonest project.

With the aid of an endless supply of resources including money and manpower along with compliant, agenda driven institutions, such as the trade unions, the bailed out banks, bonus addicted industrialists, the NHS, the Quangocracy, the NGO's, the government-media complex, including the taxpayer funded BBC, the referendum campaign will be a veritable tsunami of pro-EU propaganda.

If the treatment of Nigel Farage in the last general elections is anything to go by, the 'No/Out' campaign will be demonised, belittled, insulted and smeared without mercy.

In conclusion: Increasing numbers of people have realised that Cameron's re-negotiation is a confidence trick and his phony referendum will be a stitch up from beginning to end.

With that said, the EU superstate fanatics in the British establishment have come too far along the road to lose their prize of total integration at this late stage, therefore they will pour every available resource into the re-negotiation confidence trick and the referendum stitch up in the hope that enough low information voters will remain ignorant and anti-establishment figures like Donald Trump will not emerge and wield influence to the detriment of their beloved superstate project.

Suburban Nazis Rife According To Establishment Propaganda

Long before the current election campaign in Great Britain moved into top gear, the word 'racist' was being thrown at anyone who questioned the open border mass immigration policy of the old establishment parties. It is a calculated tactic and its ad hominem nature is used not only to close down legitimate debate but also as a smear designed to intimidate and defame.

To the consternation of the establishment party zealots, its over use is having the opposite effect of that intended, resulting in increased support for the victims of this malicious smear.

Even traditional supporters of the old establishment Labour, Conservative and the ridiculously named Liberal Democrat parties, who prefer a common sense, managed system of immigration, as opposed to the current chaos of open border mass immigration, are being smeared as 'racist' and switching support to the United Kingdom Independence Party, universally referred to as Ukip, as a result.

For obvious reasons the leaders and spin machines of these parties are unable to disrupt the Ukip campaign directly therefore they hire foot soldiers operating under various titles such 'Unite Against Fascism', Hope Not Hate', Stand Up To Ukip etc. to do their dirty work.

This includes disrupting meetings, vandalising Ukip offices, defacing Ukip advertising hoardings and threatening violence against candidates and their families. With the demise of the word 'racist" as a generic smear, these foot soldiers have substituted the words "Nazi' and 'fascist' to defame their   opponents.

Labelling honest, decent political campaigners as 'Nazi scum' is as high a level of debate that these                   demonstrators can manage and vandalising offices with the same smear is about as civilised as they can get.

These great unwashed warriors of the left obviously didn't do history at school and their understanding of political philosophy is non existant. It's lost on them that shutting down debate and intimidating opponents was a Nazi tactic used to the full by Hitler and the rest of his murderous gang.

Defacing literature and vandalising opposing political offices is more akin to nazi book burning and Chrystal Nacht than reasoned political debate. It's lost on these people that using intolerance to fight against supposed intolerance is contradictory in the extreme.

They now throw around the word 'Nazi' like they used to throw around the word 'racist'. One would think that the volunteers distributing Ukip campaign literature on the doorstep were under cover SS agents surrupticiously organising a beer hall putsch instead of promoting their candidate in a democratic election.

Nuremburg style rallies can't be far off in the future where Mr. and Mrs. Bloggs from the suburbs can finally come out of the closet and show off their goose stepping prowess in front of a huge baying crowd at a torchlight parade.

Using the words 'Nazi scum' and 'fascist' to describe ordinary decent, British citizens just because they are of a different political persuasion is ridiculous and more so since the policies they advocate are benign, sensible and increasingly popular among ordinary British citizens.

This form of extreme political campaigning is an embarrassment to the nation and it tarnishes Great Britain's image as a home of democracy and tolerance.

One can assume that the refusal of the the three legacy party leaders, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband to condemn, let alone call a halt to these tactics, is sign that they approve; after all they have everything to lose should Ukip make the breakthrough that they promise.

It has been noted by us non-aligned commentators that the old political establishment, including the bought-and-paid-for media and the BBC, are going to extraordinary lengths to discredit and disrupt a political party that they claim is only polling from ten to fifteen percent at most. Why would they do this if they are not afraid of losing their century long grip on power?

One can almost smell the fear.

Patriotism Is No Longer The Preserve Of Racists And The 'Far Right'

With election campaigns gathering speed on both sides of the Atlantic, the long suffering electorates of both countries are being force fed hypocrisy and doublespeak on a massive scale.

Modern day elections are no longer fought on the campaign trail where candidates engage the electorate on their doorsteps or by debating their policies at open public meetings; they are won by the party with the slickest media campaigns where actual policies are replaced by mudslinging and the demonising of political opponents.

Dedicated grass roots party activists have been replaced by expensively recruited PR professionals, advertising executives and image consultants who design media campaigns based on information supplied by political scientists using information from pollsters and focus groups.

Proof of this perversion of democracy is not difficult to highlight. One would think that after a five year Parliament the current representatives would know exactly the issues that are of most concern to their constituents and therefore campaign accordingly.

In Great Britain at least, the days when politicians listened to their constituents and represented them in Parliament are long gone. Expensive foreign PR consultants are deigned to be better equipped to write manifestos and decide what's best for the people.

David Cameron's Conservative Party has hired Australian Lynton Crosby, a professional PR man, as their top election strategist.

Ed Miliband's Labour Party have hired American David Axelrod, President Obama's PR man, as their election strategist.

Nick Clegg's ridiculously named Liberal Democrat Party have engaged, as opposed to hired, a South African PR man named Ryan Coetzee. While the other two parties are paying their PR men out of party funds, the Liberal Democrats are re-charging the taxpayer for the services of Mr. Coetzee.

The idea that an Australian, an American and a South African are best qualified to articulate the hopes and aspirations of the British people is absurd. They are hired as propagandists to convince the electorate by fair means or foul, mainly foul, that the politicians are on their side when they are so obviously not.

As far as the British election is concerned, what should have been a straight forward excersise for the PR men in obfuscation and election bribery has been thrown into confusion by the rise of non-establishment parties, namely the United Kingdom Independent Party, known as UKIP, the Green Party and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

The Greens and the Nationalists have their niches of support but it is UKIP that is causing the most consternation in the ivory towers of the establishment party elites.

After decades of sovereignty stripping, oppressive regulations and unrelenting looting of taxpayers money by the European Union bureaucrats, along with their policy of open border mass immigration, has resulted in a trickle of support for UKIP becoming a flood.

The UKIP message is simple: Great Britain should be a self-governing, sovereign nation as opposed to a chattel of the Soviet style EU. The British people should resume control over their borders and adopt a points based managed immigration system as opposed to the current free for all madness. British values should be paramount, with British culture unashamedly celebrated as opposed to being suppressed.

Up until the surge of support for UKIP, the three legacy parties used their long established strategy of insult and smear, accusing UKIP and its supporters of being racist and members of the 'far right'.

David Cameron lowered the tone of the debate, tarnishing the office of Prime Minister in the process, by accusing multitudes of decent British citizens of being "loonies, fruitcakes and closet racists" because they love their country and prefer it to be sovereign.

As the election campaign progresses and support for UKIP holds firm, it would appear that controlling immigration with a view to reducing the numbers, clamping down on EU regulations, returning some sovereignty to Parliament, teaching British values in schools and celebrating British culture is commendable after all.

The foreign PR men of the three establishment parties have decided that 'multi-culturalism' is not that hot after all and patriotism is no longer the preserve of racists and the 'far right'.

The pollsters and the focus groups confirm that UKIP's pro-British policies are resonating with the electorate and therefore, guided by their PR machines, the politicians have adopted the position that what was thoroughly despicible yesterday can be celebrated as laudable today.

In reality what is thoroughly despicable is the hypocrisy and base behavior of an untrustworthy political class that knows no shame and which is devoid of ethics, principle or any trace of decency.

A pox on all of them.

Fox News - David Cameron's Supporters Club

Watching the reports by Fox News on the recent Dog and Pony Show starring President Barack Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron one would be forgiven for thinking that Cameron was the pinnacle of candour and honesty.

It is to be expected that Fox News will make political capital out of Cameron's use of words such as Islamic and terrorism in the same sentence in order to contrast their own President's steadfast refusal to do the same for reasons known only to him and his inner circle. Making political capital however should not be at the expense of the truth.

Fox News and the public at large are left to speculate as to why the President is unwilling to link the global atrocities that are carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah, as directed by their prophet, Mohammad, and as written in their holy book, the Koran, with Islam.

David Cameron is getting some very undeserved kudos for his apparent candour and his bold proposals to deal with Islamic terrorists when just a smidgen of research would expose him for the media created, machine politician that he so obviously is.

One only has to look back to last August when he was being praised by Fox News for cutting short his summer vacation after a British documented Muslim, known as Jihadi John, beheaded American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff. This was in contrast to President Obama who made a perfunctory statement before moving on to the 19th hole.

The narrative at the time was that Cameron took decisive action by convening a meeting of COBRA, the governments emergency committee that details a response to any national crisis or events abroad that may have major implications for Great Britain.

Following this meeting Cameron gave the customary press conference where he outlined the tough action he proposed to take in order to deal with British jihadis and radical Islam.

He was praised to the heavens for taking tough actions such as confiscating the passports of jihadis fighting for ISIS thus preventing their return, preventing jihadis from travelling to Iraq, Syria or Somalia, taking the preachers of hate off the streets and closing down the centres of radicalisation such as certain mosques and madrassas.

It might come as a surprise to Fox News and its contributors, but not to the British people, that Cameron is not as tough as they make him out to be because none of these actions have been carried out.

After convening a meeting with COBRA, David Cameron made these same promises in May 2013 after the murder of British soldier Lee Rigby on a London Street in broad daylight by two radicalised British documented Muslims.

At least one of these killers was in contact with Great Britain's most notorious, and obnoxious, preacher of hate, Anjem 'Andy' Choudary.

Far from being removed from the streets Choudary is a walking, talking, radicalising, no-go zone, who has been given celebrity status. He is much in demand by the worlds media including Fox News.

No mosques or madrassas have been closed down.  On the contrary, mosque building is continuing at the same or increasing rate.

No passports have been confiscated. Jihadis are still departing to the war zones and they are also legally returning ready to put their newly acquired skills to use in the name of Allah as they have so often promised to do.

The breeding grounds for radical Muslims and jihadis continues to flourish in Great Britain's mono-cultural, sharia controlled ghettos without hindrance from David Cameron's government or its agencies.

To put the record straight for benefit of the American people and Fox News in particular; with a general election due in May 2015, Cameron's spin doctor choreographed public performances are for home consumption where his hold on power has been threatened by the inexorable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, known as UKIP, who's spin free, politically incorrect message is resonating with the long suffering British people.

It is understandable that the American people, including Fox News and its contributors, can be seduced by Cameron's rhetoric which he delivers with clear diction and perfectly accented English but they must not let themselves be fooled entirely.

Despite his dulcet tones, he is the consummate media created machine politician who can deliver flawless choreographed, public performances as manufactured by his army of PR men, media managers and image consultants.

There is a bright spot to this story; it would appear that if Fox News was fooled by David Cameron's PR performance their Congressmen were not. One of the reasons for his visit to Washington was to lobby Congress on the President's behalf against imposing further sanctions on Iran. By all accounts they told him to p*ss off and rightly so.

A previous article on America's liking for Cameron here.




 

Modern Propaganda - The Mayor, The Junkie And The Punk Rocker

With a general election coming ever closer in Great Britain and the century long grip of the corrupt political establishment over British life being threatened like never before, it promises to be one of the dirtiest campaigns ever.

Nobody can dispute that the political establishment has the British institutions firmly under its control. This includes the machinery of government itself. One only has to scratch the surface of any institution to find the grubby fingers of the establishment manipulating and corrupting events in order to pursue its own agenda. This agenda includes its own preservation in power as its topmost priority.

Just a partial lifting the lid off the Civil Service, the Quangocracy, the NHS, the police, the military, the judiciary, the Bank of England, local government bureaucracies, the Church of England etc. etc. will reveal an infestation of like minded operatives, apparatchiks and political cronies manipulating events to preserve establishment control.

All these institutions are brought into play during election campaigns in order to influence the eventual result but none more so than the BBC and the rest of the government-media axis.

Modern elections are not decided by the merits of each party's policies or the quality of the various candidates, they are decided by the slickness and plausibility of the media campaigns.

Political scientists, pollsters and focus groups decide what promises they need to make to the various demographic, socio-economic, ethnic or religious groups in their particular part of the country. They then leave it to the party political PR machines to design the individual media campaigns.

These party machines are made up of advertising executives, spin doctors, PR men, image consultants, media management experts and most shamefully, rebuttal and smear units.

The individual candidates are irrelevant as they are indistinguishable from each other. They tend to come from similar backgrounds who share the establishment agenda and who possess the inherent ability to hold conflicting views simultaneously while lying with a straight face at the same time.

The entrenched political establishment and its hegemony over British life has been threatened like never before by the inexorable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, universally referred to as UKIP.

This party believes that Great Britain should remain an independent, sovereign nation engaging with the world, as opposed to surrendering its sovereignty to unaccountable bureaucrats while becoming a minor province in an incestuous, post-democratic United States of Europe.

The three establishment parties, Conservative, Labour and the increasingly ludicrous Liberal Democrat party, are all committed to the United States of Europe. Subsequently they are joining forces to fight UKIP in order to preserve their hegemony over the British people while keeping their pro-EU agenda intact.

UKIP's anti-EU message is resonating with the people therefore the legacy parties have to resort to smear in order to compete and there is no better smear than the word "racist".

"Racist" is now the establishment's favourite smear and the one most frequently used, not only to smear opponents, but to close down any meaningful discussion on their common policy of open border mass immigration. In utter desperation the Labour Party has instructed its canvassers to change the subject if electors mention it during the campaign.

UKIP's policy on immigration is well known and supported by the majority of the British people. They are pro-immigration, preferring a managed points system similar to Australia and Canada as opposed to the free for all open border mass immigration as practiced by the three legacy parties.

The fact that the government-media axis can mobilise three apparently diverse and unconnected public figures to smear UKIP and its supporters as "racists" demonstrates its power over the media along with their desperation.

The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson has smeared as racist, not just UKIP and its supporters, but tens of millions of British people who oppose open border mass immigration. Johnson's media managers and image consultants portray him as an intelligent, highly educated anti-establishment rebel who's rebelliousness manifests itself as genial buffoonery.

The fact is that Johnson is a bought-and-paid-for member of the establishment who along with Prime Minister David Cameron, Chancellor George Osborne and the other legacy party leaders is fully committed to the EU project and its cultural replacement agenda.

At the same time as Johnson was smearing UKIP and the British people, the media's favourite celebrity junkie was doing the same.

One cannot be sure whether Russell Brand is having a lucid moment when he uses the racist smear or his drug addled brain is controlling his oral output. Either way its a pity that he gets credence for his ramblings because its a sad reflection of the intellectual standard of his millions of followers.

Brand also took Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to task for linking the Sydney Lindt Cafe terrorist outrage to Islam. This was despite the perpetrator being an avowed Muslim carrying out the wishes of Allah and his prophet.

One can never be absolutely sure if the multi-millionaire anarchist and self proclaimed revolutionary is acting on orders of the government-media axis or just courting publicity in order to top up his already substantial bank balance.

On the subject of anarchists, John Lydon chipped in with the racist smear along with Johnson and Brand. Lydon, better known as Johnny Rotten, the snarling, spitting front man for the now defunct punk rock band the Sex Pistols.

They portrayed themselves as the ultimate anti-establishment group taking particular pleasure in insulting the Queen and the Royal Family while espousing mayhem and anarchy at the same time.

Its another sad fact that insulting behavior and causing public outrage attracts publicity and publicity attracts money.

As far as the government is concerned getting Rotten/Lydon to smear UKIP as racist will appeal to the gullible and lend credence to the image that diverse sections of the populace associate UKIP with racism. Its classic media management by a well organised, if shameless, media machine.

In conclusion I would add that it is understandable that a ruthless establishment figure like Boris Johnson, who is committed to the EU/Cultural Replacement agenda, will use the bought-and-paid-for-media to further his aims but publicity seeking celebrities are obviously prepared to sell out their supposed anti-establishment credentials for a few pieces of silver.

Racism, Bigotry And The 'Far Right' Are Acceptable When Chasing Votes

One of the most publicised incidents during the last British general election campaign was the labeling of Rochdale resident Gillian Duffy as "a bigoted woman" for having the temerity to mention immigration to the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

(Bigot story here)

The fact that Ms Duffy and her family were long time supporters of the Labour Party was of no consequence to the Brown or his Party, she had mentioned immigration with a negative connotation and was punished in accordance with the party's calculated tactic of demonisation and smear.

Rochdale is one of the multitude of close knit, post industrial towns in England that prides itself on close family and community ties. It is also one of the multitude of towns that has been disfigured beyond recognition by the Labour's Party's policy of cultural replacement using open border mass immigration. 

The Labour Party had long planned their covert cultural replacement agenda and knew that it would face fierce opposition once the horrific repercussions started to become apparent. Equality and hate crime laws were the main battering ram they used to bow the people into submission, along with a rigidly policed policy of political correctness.

Central to these policies, and to further back up the anti-British tactic of closing down debate, was the routine use of smear and demonisation. The Labour Party turned this into a fine art with a full time Smear Unit located at the heart of Brown's government in No 10 Downing Street. 

Anyone making a statement that was remotely critical of their immigration policy or made any reference to race, religion, ethnicity, no matter how innocuous, was seized upon by Labour's race zealots and met with insults, demonisation and smear. 

Insults such as racist, bigot, xenophobe and 'far right' were thrown around with abandon regardless of whether they were appropriate or not. The idea was to shame opponents into silence closing down any debate in the process. 

Despite promises to the contrary, it became apparent after they took office that the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition shared the same cultural replacement agenda of their predecessors. They also had no intention of dealing with open border mass immigration, political correctness or the policy of smearing anyone who questioned the agenda.

The coalition added to the armoury of insults by labelling people and groups who questioned open border mass immigration as 'far right'. The main proponent of this particular smear was none other than David Cameron's token Muslim woman cabinet member, the Baroness Warsi.

As an untalented, over promoted token appointment, the noble Baroness's attempts at linking opponents of mass immigration to more unsavoury elements was amateurish to the point of embarrassing. Prior to her resignation over her support for the terrorist group Hamas, she was in the habit of labeling any critic of mass immigration as 'far right'.

To say that the political class's mass immigration policy has been a complete and utter disaster would not only be the understatement of the century, it is also their declaration of war against the British people.

The British people didn't ask for this, they weren't consulted, they don't want it and it was never put in any election manifesto. The ruling political class, under orders from the global 'progressive' elite, were going to impose a so called  'multi-cultural society' regardless.

Consequently, villages, towns and vast areas of Great Britain's major cities are unrecognisable. Welfare financed, crime ridden, mono-cultural ghettos infest British cities with some operating under sharia law and consequently out of bounds for British citizens including the police.

With the connivance and approval of the political establishment and the local authorities, including the police, social services, care homes, schools and the media, the rape and sexual abuse of thousands of under age white girls by Muslim men was allowed continue.

(Rochdale Child abuse story here)

In addition to the increased competition for jobs, Great Britain's taxpayer funded social services including, education, health and housing have been put under intolerable strain by the unsustainable increase in the population.

Although they are yet to fully re-discover the bulldog spirit that defeated Hitler and the National Socialists, the British people are slowly awakening from their media induced slumber and fighting back against a patronising and malignant political class.

The phenomenon known as the United Kingdom Independent Party, usually referred to as UKIP or the People's Army, have been growing in influence for some years, taking support from the old legacy parties together with non-aligned and independent voters.

Their prime objective is getting Great Britain out of the European Union, regaining control over the borders, economic sanity via balanced budgets and most notably putting the interests of the British people above all others.

As a measure of their rising support they recently won the European elections, vastly increased their numbers of local councillors and won their first Member of the Westminster Parliament in a byelection. Their momentum has put the fear of God into the current political establishment who up until recently variously described them, among other things, as fascists, 'far right', xenophobes, little Englanders etc. 

The current Prime Minister David Cameron famously referred to UKIP supporters as "loonies, fruitcakes and closet racists".

The meteoric rise in support for UKIP and the corresponding fall in support for the legacy parties has heralded a change in the usual political discourse and in particular a change in language.

Not only are the policies and lexicon of UKIP no longer attracting the usual smears of racist, bigot and 'far right', they are actively being adopted by the three legacy parties.

The Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron spotted the threat earlier and has been making false promises for some time about border control, access to welfare for immigrants, deportation of foreign criminals and whole raft of measures he knows the EU bureaucrats will forbid him to action.

The rise of UKIP is heralding the end for Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and his ludicrously named Liberal Democrat Party. If ever there was a party of loonies and fruitcakes this collection of weirdos is it; to make the list of names more accurate we can add sex pests, fornicators, perverts and paedophiles. 

In a desperate attempt to ward off oblivion Clegg has softened his previously solid anti-British pro-immigrant stance and is talking in terms that would have attracted smears from him had they been spoken by a UKIP representative.

It has long been accepted that Cameron and Clegg are in total thrall to the EU bureaucrats and are prepared to lie, deceive, obfuscate and make any false promise to implement their masters agenda. It is the utter hypocrisy of the Labour Party that really beggars belief.

This is the party that has been most dedicated to the cultural replacement agenda and the most prolific in the use of insult, demonisation and smear to denigrate opponents. The Labour Party has an even uglier side it is wont to employ in order to intimidate its opponents. They call themselves Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and they violently disrupt UKIP activities hurling insults such as 'racist' and 'fascist' with abandon.

Supposedly independent of the Labour Party, UAF are in fact their unwashed, post-pubescent street activists who enjoy a bit slogan shouting, banner waving and aggravation. They enjoy pretend revolution along with bayonets and barricades rhetoric and a cup of hot chocolate from their mothers before bedtime.

(Labour and UAF here)

Labour Party leader Ed Miliband together with his second-in-command Harriet Harman and his Shadow Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper-Balls, are all stealing UKIP's clothes and talking the same UKIP language that attracted insults from them less than a week ago.

(Miliband hypocrisy here)

Harman hypocrisy here)

(Yvette Cooper hypocrisy here)

Yesterdays insults are no longer applicable when the ruling class want to use the same policies and arguments to steal the votes of the people they previously dismissed as racists and bigots. 

This kind of  cynical behavior and breathtaking hypocrisy is utterly disgraceful and serves as a clear demonstration of the abysmal standard of politician that has lied and spun their way into office. It is hoped that the rise of UKIP will consign these charlatans to the dustbin of history where they so rightly belong.   

       

Meryl Streep Plays The Iron Lady - David Cameron Plays Himself

Anyone who has watched Meryl Streep's depiction of the former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the film The Iron Lady, can not have failed to have been impressed by how uncannily well she played the part. In addition to an Oscar nomination, she also won Golden Globe and BAFTA awards for best actress.

Written by Abi Morgan and directed by Phyllidia Lloyd, the one criticism one reads about is that by choosing Margaret Thatcher's decent into dementia as the backdrop instead of her history changing presence on the world stage, they missed a golden opportunity to make a truly classic biographical movie.

As good as the film was, when everything is taken into consideration Meryl Streep's performance was just acting and The Iron Lady, despite being loosely based on historical events, was mostly fiction.

For those of us fortunate enough to be immune to spin and the black arts of media manipulation, David Cameron's speech to the Conservative Party conference last week was similar to Ms. Streep's movie performance but without the glamour. It was all just acting and the contents of his speech, despite being loosely based on history, was mostly fiction also.

The whole choreographed charade was directed by Cameron's expensively hired political strategist, Lynton Crosby and written by his team of spin doctors. The object of the exercise is to get Cameron re-elected with his personal political agenda intact with little or no regard for the truth or the aspirations of the British people.

Although it is most likely down to professional coaching, one has to give Cameron credit for his acting abilities. His performance may not have won him an Oscar but his ability to read a prepared script, using emphasis and cadence in the right places, and making good use of choreographed body language, he came across as mildly Prime Ministerial.

(One has to admit that compared with the previous weeks performance by Labour Party leader Ed Miliband, he was positively Churchillian. No great achievement under the circumstances but I digress)

Before looking at the speech itself it is worth keeping in mind some facts about David Cameron, his core beliefs and his political loyalties. This will help the reader to understand the subtlety of the deception being perpetrated on the British people and also to admire the dubious skills of Lynton Crosby and his team of media manipulators.

On seizing control of the Conservative Party, Cameron replaced their traditional British values and policies with the trendy 'progressive' agenda that has been adopted by the remote, wealthy metropolitan elite. They live under the mistaken belief that only their view is right and all other views, including those of the British people, should be ignored.

He has had little or no contact with the British people, he cannot identify with them, he has no empathy for them, he has little understanding of them nor does he care. Whatever he says, the truth is he is totally committed to the 'progressive' transformational agenda for Great Britain. This consists primarily of remaining a member of the European Union at all costs and with all that entails.

When reading the speech it is essential to keep Cameron's previous statements and actions at the forefront of ones mind or run the risk of being seduced by his faux passion and his convincing display. Also remember it is choreographed for its impact in the media for their use in the coming election campaign.
(Get the transcript here)

There was no better way for him to kick things off than by displaying his patriotism coupled with his supposed respect for our glorious military men and women. Bearing in mind he is eviscerating the same military in readiness for its absorption into the European Defence Force.  Associating himself with a ninety one year old veteran of the Normandy landings created the right image but was particularly cynical.

He goes on to invoke the horrors of ISIS in order to justify the bombing campaign in Iraq and to deal with ISIS abroad before they bring terror and murder to the streets of Great Britain.

Obviously Cameron suffers from the same selective amnesia that afflicted Ed Miliband during his speech last week where he forgot to mention the deficit his party left behind.

As a reminder, Muslim terror and murder has already been visited on the streets of Great Britain for some years.

The 7th July bombings, the 21st July attempted bombings, the beheadings of Drummer Lee Rigby and eighty two year old widow, Palmira Silva in London, may have conveniently slipped his mind but not the minds of those people who pay attention.

Continuing with his recently acquired tough guy act, Cameron warned the home grown ISIS terrorists that he will deal with them very firmly indeed. He threatened to prosecute and imprison them or take away their passports. If they are already in Syria or Iraq he will stop them coming back. He is well aware that he can't do this under international law but no matter, there's an election coming up next year and he needs to appear tough.

In a shameless attempt to win the Yorkshire vote he invoked the spirit of another tough guy. Continually at his side during his fight to keep the British people safe from the radical Muslim jihadis that are the creation of his beloved 'multi-cultural society' stood England's greatest living Yorkshireman, William Hague.

I am not sure that the title he has bestowed upon the man known locally as Little Willy Squit has secured the Yorkshire vote, but that's the risk one takes when you hire an Australian as your election guru.

As a sop to the disenchanted and disenfranchised people of England, Cameron has bestowed upon the retiring Hague the task of securing for the English people some democratic justice after the shameless Scottish referendum bribery scandal.

"So this is my vow: English votes for English laws - the Conservatives will deliver it!" How can any English person not vote for David Cameron after that cast iron guarantee?

So on it went for an hour or so, false promise after false promise eloquently delivered in a practiced contrived style that was worthy of an academy award. He doesn't believe a word of it but he delivered it anyway in an attempt to win back the voters that have suffered the consequences of his 'progressive' agenda and who have jumped ship to the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP).

The speech was riddled with the usual soundbites and slogans that have become tedious to all but those who live their lives in the spin doctor dominated, out-of-touch Westminster village.

"Families come first, they are the way you make a nation strong" - In truth Cameron promised to give families a tax break which didn't materialize.

"I care deeply about those who struggle to get by" - In truth Cameron has deliberately increased income taxes,  consumption taxes, fuel and booze duty, energy prices and the cost of living in general.

He then proceeds to let go a series of slogans that are patently in contradiction to what he says and what he does in practice:

"I believe in something for something not something for nothing" - In his speech Cameron claims that those who do the right thing and put in the effort are the people that should be rewarded. This is so patently false because living on welfare is still a lifestyle choice enjoyed by millions and welfare tourism by economic migrants is still effectively unchallenged.

"A Britain that everyone is proud to call home is a Britain where hard work is really rewarded".

"Not a free for all, but a chance for all".

And in a complete contradiction to the reality of David Cameron's Great Britain : "There's no reward without effort; no wealth without work; no success without sacrifice...."  Except of course if you are a politician, a crony, a quangocrat, a cheating recipient of welfare entitlements or an economic migrant.

What about this for cheek: "So let other politicians stand on stages like this and promise an easy life. Not me".......

With a chapter of caveats Cameron sums up this section with:

"Its pretty simple really: a good job , a nice home, more money at the end of the month, a decent education for your children, a safe and secure retirement.

A country where if you put in, you get out

A Britain everyone is proud to call home

And real long term plan to get there"

The delivery of his Crosby inspired speech goes from strength to strength:

"What I call: full employment in Britain. Just think what that would mean:

"Those who can work, able to work......standing on their own two feet, looking at their children and thinking - I am providing for you.

We can get there - but only if we stick to our plan".

After almost five years of austerity and increasing taxes, Cameron is promising to:

"..balance the books by 2018, and start putting aside money for the future".

With echoes of his cast iron guarantee of an EU referendum, Cameron sums up this section thus:

"So here is our commitment to the British people:

No income tax if you are on minimum wage.

A twelve and a half thousand pound personal allowance for millions of hard working people

And you only pay 40p tax when you earn fifty thousand pounds.

With the Conservatives, if you work hard and do the right thing we say you should keep more of your own money to spend as you choose".

These particular policies have been unashamedly stolen from the UKIP manifesto in the mistaken belief that stealing some of their clothes will hide who they really are. It truly is desperate stuff.

I will leave it to the reader to continue with the remaining pages of this soundbite and slogan riddled nonsense. It was designed not to tell the truth but to give the impression that David Cameron actually cares about the British people or their hopes and aspirations with a view to securing his re-election.

He has devoted his political life to implementing the EU driven agenda and in that he is single minded, it is his absolute priority.

He has never listened to the British people and he has no intention of listening to them any time soon. He strongly believes that if he delivers a media orientated speech loaded with false promises, soundbites and slogans he can hoodwink the British people into electing him as their Prime Minister.

They do so at their peril. If they fall for his play acting they will lose their country to the EU bureaucrats once and for all.