Kevin Spacey Is The Product Of A Godless Depraved Society

People should not be surprised by the revelation that Hollywood idol Kevin Spacey enjoys having sex with men and young boys. Sex with children is accepted as a perfectly normal practice among inhabitants of Tinsel Town as their defense of abominations like Roman Polanski and Woody Allen demonstrates.

Sex between adults and children may not be acceptable just yet by the public at large but among those who have declared themselves the enlightened leaders of society it is considered to be a normal, healthy and natural sexual practice. They believe that pedophilia will eventually become as normal and acceptable as homosexuality and other forms of unnatural sexual and gender dysfunction.

Child sex abusers are not confined to perverts like Kevin Spacey or the entertainment industry; they infect every area of life from politics and the judiciary to sport and community organizations. Even the Roman Catholic Church has had its scandals with enrobed pedophiles assaulting choir boys when they thought God wasn't looking.

The sad fact is that the more widespread child sexual exploitation becomes the bigger the call for it to be legalized.

Child sexual exploitation in America is in its infancy compared to Great Britain where it has been absolutely rampant for decades and tolerated by the authorities.

The top stars of the taxpayer funded state broadcaster, known universally as the BBC, were involved in a pedophile ring which abused children and assaulted vulnerable women for decades.

One of them, a creature named Jimmy Savile, was so depraved he used his celebrity status to gain access to children’s hospitals where he sexually assaulted children in their sick beds. Everyone and his uncle at the BBC, as well as nursing staff at the hospitals, were aware of Savile’s depravity but kept silent supposedly to protect his fundraising activities. 

His fund raising activities, it must be added, were used as another front to gain access to children which he subsequently abused.

Led by the city of Rotherham, towns and cities across Great Britain were infested with Muslim pedophile gangs who groomed, gang raped and pimped out underage white girls with the tacit approval of the local authorities; this included elected local officials and Members of Parliament. (See history of Rotherham Muslim Pedophiles here)

It also included the police, schools, children’s homes and, most shamefully, the local children’s welfare departments who were all aware but remained silent for reasons of ‘cultural sensitivity’ and their concern for something called ‘community cohesion’.

Since nobody in authority has been held accountable and punished for being accessories to these crimes against children, there are some 40,000 victims who have been denied justice and sacrificed on the altars of political correctness and government imposed multi-culturalism.

Most of the areas infested with these Muslim pedophile gangs are controlled by the socialist Labour Party whose founders have campaigned for a century or more to normalize then legalize sex between adults and children.

The history of legalizing pedophilia goes back to the Bloomsbury Group, the Fabian Society and latterly with the Labour and Liberal Parties.

Labour Politicians And Child Sex - Its Not A Scandal Its Progressive

Since it was taken over and ‘modernized’ by an inner circle of remote, trendy elitists these ‘progressive’ ideas have also infested the British Conservative Party in addition to the Democratic Party in the USA.  

This gradual acceptance of pedophilia is not the result of a natural evolution of a perverted practice over time; the slow process of legalizing sex between adults and children has been one of the primary goals of the so-called ‘progressive’ left for over a century.

Even a cursory glance into the Bloomsbury Group shines a light on the history of this 'progressive' movement and reveals the origin of the descent into depravity which we see taking place today.

The Bloomsbury Group was a gathering of influential self-styled intellectuals, including artists, economists and politicians who believed that a 'progressive' socialist society should consider acts of sexual depravity, including those with children, as normal.

Influential people of the day such as John Maynard Keynes, Lytton Strachey, Havelock Ellis and Bertrand Russell considered themselves to be 'progressive' and were all drug addicts, perverts and pederasts.

They all had a penchant for sodomy, young boys and each other; they despised Christianity and any other form of morality. These people were depravity personified and agitated for the normalization of homosexuality and sex between adults and children.

It’s a source of great mirth to know that John Maynard Keynes, the idol and mentor of socialists the world over, was a filthy, depraved nonce who’s perverted economic policies mirrored his perverted sexual desires but I digress.

Child Poverty And Sex Abuse - Fighting One While Promoting The Other

The process of legalizing sex between adults and children is easy to follow and began with the removal of God and Christianity, along with its festivals and symbols, from public life. This effectively removed the moral code that allowed western civilization to evolve over two millennia and prevented the depravity we are witnessing today with the acceptance of degenerates like Spacey, Polanski, Savile and Mohammad, etc.

Firstly the political elite decriminalized homosexual practices between consenting adults over the age of 21 years in private.

When this was achieved they campaigned to lower the age of consent to 18 years with an ongoing campaign to lower it to 16 years then 12 years then 10 years. Eventually they plan to abolish the age limit altogether.

Next they abolished the privacy requirement of the law by allowing public displays of homosexuality using parades and marches and forcing public institutions like the police service and fire departments to take part.

All this is accompanied by a massive propaganda campaign to normalize homosexuality and impose its acceptance on society by demonizing, smearing and threatening anyone who voiced opposition.

The next step was to make legally recognized civil partnerships available to same sex couples in lieu of formal marriage.

When this had been achieved the next step was to legalize marriage between same sex couples and give such unions equal status with heterosexual marriage.

This move effectively abolished the sanctity of marriage and in effect ended the traditional family unit which in turn paved the way for the lowering of standards of decency and the acceptance of degeneracy has a basic human right. .  

When this step had been achieved all gender distinctions were abolished altogether, a state where any gender dysfunction or sexual practice no matter how perverse and degenerate is considered to be perfectly normal and natural.

By grouping all unnatural sexual preferences and gender dysfunctions under one umbrella, LGBTQFU69 etc. the ‘progressive’ political elite are using the forced acceptance of these practices to add paedophilia and incest to the list and legalize them accordingly.

The following quote by the late Sir Henry Hodge is confirmation of this fact: 
"Homosexuals are now widely regarded as ordinary, healthy people - a minority but no more 'ill' than the minority who are left handed. There is no reason why paedophilia should not win similar acceptance." - Sir Henry Hodge, High Court Judge and Labour Party Councillor. 

As has become standard practice by governments and those with an agenda to impose, anyone who voices disagreement with any part of it is demonized and smeared as a homophobe, transphobe, bigot etc. and threatened with prosecution for so-called hate speech or hate crimes.

In conclusion, many people make the valid case that the first step in the process of legalizing paedophilia, i.e. decriminalizing homosexual acts and instituting civil partnerships are right and proper in a modern, civilized society. But it didn’t end there. What people failed to realize is that these were the opening shots in a ‘progressive’ war by a global elite to destroy Judeo-Christian civilization, a war which they are winning and one which we will all pay a terrible price in the end.

Post Script – it has been suggested that since pedophilia is an accepted practice in the Muslim Ummah along with child marriage and incest, its tolerance and eventual legalization is being used to help with the Islamization of the west and also to herald the introduction of sharia law.

Looking at the behavior and actions of the political elite this could very well be the case.    

Offended Immigrant Sues Jeremy Clarkson And Wants BBC To Drop Top Gear

One of the endearing characteristics of the long suffering British people is their placid acceptance of ingrates who have abandoned their home countries to enjoy the benefits of British hospitality then do nothing but complain about the host nation's way of life when it doesn't meet their expectations.

News that a little known Indian actress is suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC for a perceived insult to an ethnic group of which she does not belong should come as no surprise to anyone outside of the political correctness industry. It is also beyond obvious why this particular ingrate is taking the action that she is.

To say that Somi Guha's film career is non existent would be an understatement.  When the opportunity arose to make some easy money, and enhance her public profile in the process, she must have thought it was her birthday and Diwali rolled into one. The photograph that was used to front this lawsuit was hardly that of a grossly offended victim of bigotry but more of a failed actress using the best image in her portfolio to attract attention.

The lawsuit itself doesn't smell right. It claims that Ms. Guha has instructed lawyers at the trendy, 'right on' law firm Equal Justice, to sue Clarkson and the BBC for a million pounds.

Firstly, the alleged insult used the word 'slope' which refers to those of East Asian origin such as Japanese, Vietnamese or, as in this case, Burmese - she herself is an Indian therefore there are no grounds for her to be offended.

Secondly, where a little known actress gets the money to instigate a law suit is a mystery. She cannot possibly be offended to the point that she would risk her own treasure unless she was put up to it by a vested interest willing to fill her coffers and raise her public profile in order to censor Jeremy Clarkson.

For her information, Top Gear is one of the most popular programmes on the planet and Jeremy Clarkson one of the most popular presenters. The programme uses laddish or schoolboy humour and everyone knows it is irreverent and non politically correct.  If this is not to Ms. Guha's liking then she shouldn't watch it.

Switching off or changing channels is one of the benefits of living in a free country and it can be achieved using a remote control from the comfort of ones own armchair.

Immigrants demanding that the British people change their way of life and their attitudes in order to accommodate theirs has resulted in any Tom, Dick or Abdul taking action against the very people who gave them sanctuary and the opportunity to enjoy a better life than in their home country.

It is sad to note that oppressive political correctness, 'hate crime' laws and intimidation by organized smear units, prevents the majority of British people from revealing what they really think.  Being a dissenter I refuse to be intimidated by the establishment and I couldn't care less about being prosecuted.

However much I am vilified and accused of being a racist, I am not one;  I just happen to disagree with the current political class about open border mass immigration and I do not believe there is such a thing as a functioning multi-cultural society.

In the interests of community cohesion and cultural enrichment, I will try to help Ms. Guha, and other immigrants, to understand some of the harmless quirks of the British people that they should accept as guests. If they intend to settle in Great Britain they should adopt these little quirks and pass them on to future generations.

We British are self deprecating, we laugh and poke fun at each other, we call each other names and are not offended. We were brought up with a proverb which they should teach their own children:

"Sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me".

If you plan to settle in Great Britain I suggest you get used to it - its what we do, its part of our national character, its who we are and no amount of litigation, legislation or whining will change it. If you can't accept it then maybe Great Britain is not the place for you.

Here is a list of names and cat calls where no malice is intended and no offence is taken until the PC police undertook to impose their multi-cultural agenda:

Scottish people - Jocks, Tartan Terrorists, Ginger Mingers, Wife beaters

English people - Limeys (also generic British when abroad), Whinging Poms (By Australians) Stick your f*cking chariots up your a*rse is a quaint Welsh rugby chant.

Welsh people - Taffy's, Pit Boys, Pit Ponies. Morlocks, and my particular favourite, Sheep Sh*ggers.( This is my own ethnic group, I have been called all of these names and worse and never taken offence)

North East English People - Geordies

Liverpool people - Scousers

Then there's Mancs, Brummies, Kentish Men and Men of Kent.

Irish people - Paddy's, Bog Hoppers, Leprechauns, Micks

American people - Yanks, Sceptics ( rhyming slang based on sceptic tank)

Jewish people - Yids or 4x2's ( Rhyming slang again)

Gypsies - Gypos, Pikies and Didicoys for the flower selling variety.

British people never go for a Chinese meal, they always go for a Chinky.

No ethnic group should be surprised or offended if the indigenous British people give them a nickname.

Sledging and name calling on the field of sport is legendary and some of it is hair curling stuff. Listening to what Mohamed Ali called his opponents would send the serially offended running to their lawyers in fits of apoplexy wanting financial compensation for their own hurt feelings.

There are also names, some unflattering, for tall people, short, fat, thin, fast, slow and so on.

One of the more irritating aspects of the serially offended community is their taking of offence on behalf of other people who are not themselves offended. This gives the said community blanket coverage to be permanently offended and therefore an opportunity to impose political correctness, Cultural Marxism to give it its proper name,  and in effect censor unorthodox opinions.

One would have thought that being an Indian, and an actress to boot, she would make sure that her own house was in order before entering someone else's demanding they change their ways.

Bollywood, the world famous Indian film industry is renown for offending and insulting minorities particularly Sikhs and Muslims with women being a particular target.

It is not racist of me to suggest that Ms.Guha return to her native land and sue her socks off to end discrimination against women, lower caste people and immigrants who, incidentally, are only trying to make a living.

One of the most discriminated against minorities are Christians who unjustly make up six percent of India's prison population.

Excuses for Ms.Guha to issue law suits are in abundance in India where discrimination on the basis of gender and caste is legendary. Offensive and insulting names such as Dalit and Harijan are in common usage - Gandhi himself objected to the names, Harijan and Untouchables, being used for his fellow Indian citizens.

Ms. Guha could be offended and sue on behalf of the African community in Mumbai who are on the receiving end of appalling abuse and discrimination. Read the story of Nigerian Sambo Davis here.

Incidentally, referring to an African gentleman as 'Sambo' is taboo and grounds for a law suit so please Ms. Guha, instruct your lawyers to sue away.

The fact is that according to The Hindu newspaper,  Somi Guha's home country is rife with racism, discrimination and name calling so with that in mind I will articulate what the majority of British people are thinking; before you start agitating on your own or a vested interests behalf to change the British people's way of life, you should go back to your own country and put that right first.

Looting The Public Purse Is Now An Epidemic - No Cure In Sight

After years of spinning to the contrary, British politicians are being forced to admit that living standards are falling dramatically for most people but more so for the hard pressed middle class.

This is the same group of people who always bear the brunt of the economic illiteracy that is endemic among the political class and their cronies;  a political class who always seem to be immune from the consequences of their own incompetence.

As is the case with the welfare addicted 'entitlement' junkies, for this privileged group of people there is no recession and their living standards only ever go up. The fact that there is no money left in the Treasury and the government is supposedly embarking on a series of government spending cuts, this group of cronies continue to loot what money is raised in taxes and award themselves public money which is borrowed from future generations.

Never has there been such a shamelessly dishonest soundbite than the one uttered by the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, that "we are all in it together".

It was mooted that he was referring to himself and the public sector fat cats who all have their snouts in the public trough together, but alas no, he was referring to the country as a whole even though he knew we are most definitely "not all in it together".  (Having the ability to lie with a straight face is an essential skill for a career in politics and the public sector).

The Parliamentary expenses scandal is documented elsewhere but as an example of the contempt for the taxpayer and the overbearing sense of entitlement displayed by a politician, one only has to take a cursory look at the Jacqui Smith scandal.

This venal freeloader was appointed Home Secretary which came with a grace and favour apartment in the classic Admiralty Arch and a salary/expenses package worthy of a lottery winner. Smith turned down the accommodation and went on to claim that a box room in her sister's home was her primary residence.

According to the 'rules', she was thus 'entitled' to a series of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses for her personal residence.  She maximized these to the full including 80p sink plugs and pornographic movies for her husband to pleasure himself with while she herself slept blissfully in her sister's box room.  (Smiths husband was also employed as her secretary on an eye watering $67,300 per annum, care of the taxpayer).

Smith's constituents did the right thing and booted her out at the next election but the public teat is addictive and taxpayers are an endless source of money.  She has been given work by the BBC, ironically making a documentary on porn, and she is currently in possession of a sinecure with KPMG, care of her old boss Phony Tony Blair.

The extent of the looting is enormous,  it is being carried out with impunity and with complete disregard for the fact that this money has been earned by someone else then confiscated by the government under threat of imprisonment.

After a series of scandals, the disgraced senior management declared open season at the taxpayer funded BBC;  six figure payoffs were the norm, including $800,000 for one executive alone.  The Metropolitan police 'service' were called in but refused to open an investigation due to lack of evidence.  The politicized Metropolitan Police only investigate 'hate crimes' these days, in the interests of political correctness and community cohesion.

Another bottomless pit of taxpayer loot can be found at local council offices across the country.  Serving the public appears not to be a priority for these fat cats.

Council bureaucrat and career parasite Mark Hammond walked off with a $410,000 payoff before re-attaching himself to the public nipple with an appointment to the taxpayer funded Equality and Human Rights Commission, a short time after.

Kent County Council leader Kathrine Kerswell walked away with a staggering $950,000 payoff after only 20 months work.  Kent taxpayers doled out a massive $17,280,000 in exit payments for council bureaucrats in 2011/12 alone.

The giant socialist monstrosity misnamed the  National Health Service (NHS), is tailor made for looting bureaucrats. The public are being led to believe that the NHS is short of funding for patient care, yet the sky's the limit for paying off parasites.

Nine hundred and fifty managers have walked away with six figure payoffs, many of whom have resurfaced in another part of the NHS shortly after. The NHS has paid out a scandalous $2.2 billion since 2010 in severance packages for bureaucrats.  This is pillaging of the public purse on an enormous scale and from an economy the people are told has no money.

For more looting of the public purse, see here,  here and here.

Government ministers have acknowledged that there is a problem with excessive payouts to bureaucrats but have so far failed to do anything about it or to recoup any of the money on behalf of the taxpayer.

The sad fact is that politicians, thieving bureaucrats and government ministers are all part of the same machine that regards the public as it's servants and their hard earned money as their own to do with as they please.

I live in hope that one day the people wake up from their self induced slumber and hold these shysters to account, then vote the bums out once and for all.

Update:  To add insult to injury the odious career bureaucrat, Sharon Shoesmith, who's department's incompetence resulted in the horrific death of Baby Peter Connolly, walked away with a $960,000 pay off after challenging her sacking.

This package was arranged by her fellow bureaucrats on Haringey Council. Who says the political class doesn't look after its own?

Update II: Taxpayers gouged for another $320,000 for lawyers fees in Shoesmith case.

Update III: Looting at its worst. NHS give husband and wife team $1,600,000 taxpayer funded payoff and re-hires them shortly after.

There is no recourse for the taxpayer.

BBC - Child Sex Abuse, It Doesn't Get Worse Than This

Again I must interrupt my tour and put pen to paper. I am filled with utter horror and disgust as I watch the BBC child sex abuse scandal unfold. Jimmy Savile was a creature so debased and perverted he actually sexually assaulted handicapped children and cancer sufferers in their hospital beds.

It went on for decades and apparently his co-workers together with hundreds of other people knew about it but they all turned a blind eye because of this filthy animals' celebrity.

Savile was BBC royalty, he could do no wrong. Children were routinely sexually abused on BBC property.

It is not credible that the upper echelons at the BBC did not know about the high profile paedophile in their midst. Some of Savile's victims are suggesting that there is a child sex ring at the heart of the BBC. I wouldn't be at all surprised.

The News of the World newspaper has been closed down and some of its journalists have been arrested over the phone hacking scandal. I accept that this was bad behavior by the press but it is nothing compared to the child sex abuse scandal at the BBC.

The BBC is a debased organisation that has outlived its usefulness, we do not need a taxpayer funded state broadcaster spewing out political correctness and left wing propaganda all day long.

This child sex abuse scandal at the BBC is the last straw, heads must roll, somebody must go to jail and above all, as with The News of the World, the BBC must be closed down immediately.