Politically Correct British Cops Make Asses of Themselves

With the continued Wuhan virus hysteria and lockdown rebellion stories dominating the media it is gratifying to know that normal life is continuing especially where the modernized British police ‘service’ is concerned.

Like all other public institutions, the police force of old has been politicized by the ‘progressive’ ruling class who have put the imposition of political correctness above protecting and serving the public.

Recent antics have brought ridicule down on their heads and turned the police force into a laughingstock which has sadly resulted in a loss of the respect it once enjoyed.

   

If we thought that spending valuable resources monitoring Twitter and other social media platforms for possible ‘hate speech’ was political correctness gone crazy, then launching a ‘sexual assault’ appeal after a lorry driver kissed a 70 year old woman on the cheek for helping him navigate under a low bridge is beyond ridicule.

With a complete lack of self-awareness this is exactly what the local constabulary in Derbyshire is doing.

It is worth repeating that the Derbyshire police 'service' have launched an appeal to track down a lorry driver who gave an elderly lady a peck on the cheek as thanks for helping him navigate under a low bridge. (Check it out here)

To give readers an idea of what a politically correct copper looks like, the Deputy Chief Constable of Derbyshire is pictured above.

In line with the rest of the woke ‘police services’ in Great Britain, their obsession with political correctness and all things sexual is all pervading; they have even classified the innocent, age old compliment of wolf whistling as sexual assault along with mis-gendering a person even if it’s done innocently or in error.

There is one area where all things sexual and the dedication to political correctness of the Derbyshire police has had life wrecking consequences for a group of vulnerable people they have sworn to protect.

These are the child victims of grooming gangs which are comprised of mainly Pakistani and other Muslim groups.

Along with the politicized police services across the country, the Derbyshire ‘police service’ ignored the desperate pleas of underage white girls and their parents/guardians for decades while they were being fed alcohol and drugs then gang raped, sexually abused and pimped out to other paedophile gangs across the country.

According to these uniformed enablers of child rape, it was cultural sensitivity and community cohesion that prevented them from protecting these under age girls from gangs of depraved predators; this turning a blind eye was accompanied by threats of prosecution and imprisonment for anyone who brought these heinous crimes to their attention or to the attention of the public at large.

The acceptance by the police, and other authorities, of child rape and sexual abuse by Muslim grooming gangs is a very dark episode indeed in the history of British law enforcement and one which is continuing to this day.      

At this moment in time while police officers are searching the country for a thankful lorry driver, scouring Twitter and social media for ‘hate speech’, prancing in gay pride parades and clamping down on wolf whistlers, under age white girls are being groomed, gang raped, sexually abused and pimped out by grooming gangs under their noses.

By their dedication to political correctness and their resultant imbecilic antics, these police officers are not only a laughingstock, they are bringing ridicule and shame on themselves, as well as the nation.

To conclude: Child abuse is as serious as it is unforgivable and on this industrial scale, even more so.

For justice to be done, those police and local authority officers who stood by and allowed these under age girls to be horrifically abused should be removed from office, with loss of accrued benefits, then prosecuted and punished accordingly. They should also be permanently banned from holding public office in any capacity.

Associated articles:

Huddersfield Grooming: Twenty guilty of campaign of rape and abuse.

Police chief apologises after children abused 'in plain sight'.

West Yorkshire police officer and 15 Halifax men appear in court charged with child sexual exploitation.

Unapproved Opinions Are Not Allowed in The Liberal Utopia

The right to form one’s own opinions and the freedom to express them publicly is a fundamental right that is coming under attack by governments and supranational bodies across the free world because they fear the unrestricted flow of information and opinions will counter their own propaganda.

It is now increasingly the case that people expressing an opinion that fails to fit the ‘progressive’ narrative being created by the globalist elite will attract sanctions and in some cases arrest and prosecution.

Doctors and teachers have been sacked for expressing unapproved opinions on gender while pupils have been expelled from school for the same reason. Scientists have been ostracized and denied a forum if the results of their research fail to fit the false narrative the globalists have created on climate change.

The rights that have been endowed upon us by our Creator are inalienable and cannot be taken away by politicians but that won’t stop them trying. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us, the people of the free world, to exercise those rights whenever and wherever we choose lest the political elite deem them obsolete and use that as an excuse to let them wither on the vine or revoke them.

To that end I will exercise my inalienable right to express opinions that the authorities would like to ban, and which have attracted sanctions in the recent past:

Gender

Regardless of the current narrative being imposed by supranational institutions and 'progressive' governments around the world there are only two genders, male and female. Neither politicians nor the so-called LGBTQ+ ‘community’ can override biological science. Neither can they override the Laws of Nature or of Nature’s God.

Furthermore, it is also my opinion that men identifying as women are still men and should not be allowed to participate in women’s sporting competitions. Nor should they use women’s locker rooms, bathrooms, dormitories or any other facility that has been designated as ‘Women Only’.

Islam

Despite a concerted campaign by the United Nations, the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and governments around the world to portray it as benign, Islam is not a great global religion of peace. One only has to read the Koran and look at the carnage meted out across the world by its adherents to see that nothing could be further from the truth.

After reading the Koran, listening to its preachers of hate and looking at the carnage perpetrated in its name, it is my opinion that Islam is a death cult intent on making the whole world subject to shariah law.

To compound my crime, it is my humble opinion that Islam is incompatible with the Judeo-Christian culture of the west and therefore immigration of its adherents should be severely restricted.

Climate Change

After studying the evidence and paying attention to the enthusiasm with which politicians have embraced it, I've concluded that there is no climate emergency. Life on earth will not become extinct in ten, twenty or a hundred years because human activity is creating an earthly version of Dante's inferno by heating up the planet to Gas Mark 9.

The entire climate change issue is a naked power grab by politicians and the global elite as well as being a lucrative money-making scam for unscrupulous, opportunist fake scientists.

Israel

The land of Israel is the ancient and eternal homeland of the Jewish people and Jerusalem is its capital. There is no evidence, archaeological, written or otherwise to suggest that there has ever been a centrally governed, homogeneous country called Palestine. The phony stolen land narrative is used by anti-Semites as cover for their hatred of Jews.

Mass Immigration

From my research it is the majority opinion that mass immigration has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and their way of life. If there is one issue that highlights the gaping chasm between the people and the politicians, it’s their policy of open border mass immigration. There is not a town or city that has not been blighted by the mass influx of incompatible people from the Third World as well as economic migrants and welfare colonists.

Despite a shortage of housing, school places, health care provision, money and other social infrastructure the politicians absolutely refuse to stop it.  

Imposed Multi-culturalism

Contrary to the ludicrous claim by the political class and their globalist bedfellows, Great Britain is not the most successful, multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-cultural country on earth. A title, incidentally that is claimed by Australia, Canada, the United States and others.

The reality is that Great Britain is home to thousands of semi-autonomous, mono-cultural ghettos controlled by imams, tribal elders and gang leaders. Many are welfare supported, crime-ridden and off limits to the police and the indigenous population.

In areas governed by shariah law the Queen's writ does not run. They are, for all intents and purposes, foreign countries within the United Kingdom. Hailed as an example of a successful multi-cultural city, London is now a white minority third world cesspit where turf wars and other violent crimes are out of control. There are oases of peace and prosperity, but they are few and far between and occupied exclusively by the minted elite.

No politician has ever explained to the British people why they should ‘celebrate diversity’ or how ‘diversity is our strength’ when the incomers continue their ancient rivalries and bloody conflicts on British soil.

How is diversity our strength when the government must spend millions of taxpayers' money on something called ‘community cohesion’?

Abortion

The jury is still out but it appears that more people are leaning toward the view that life begins at conception. It is most definitely present when a heartbeat is detected. A fetus in the womb is not ‘a clump of cells’ as the abortionists claim, to be destroyed and disposed of because its inconvenient.

It’s strange to think that if a single celled organism was found on Mars it would be evidence of life but a fully formed baby in the womb is merely a ‘clump of cells’ that can be legally put to death.

Political Correctness 

This is the insidious force by which the ruling political class imposes its will on the people. It does this by strictly controlling what they can say in public. By narrowing down what can be said they will eventually control what can be thought.

When this stage is reached only government approved opinions will be allowed and the nightmare of George Orwell’s prophetic novel 1984 will be a reality.

There are many more opinions which the politicians and their agents in the police service would like to suppress but I will conclude by saying that I believe the opinions expressed here are held by the majority and by expressing them I have committed heresy and even blasphemy against the politically correct agenda that the government and the supranational bodies are forcing the people to accept.

Also, I have left myself open to censorship and if a single snowflake takes offence and the authorities take note I am liable for possible prosecution for hate speech which I would consider to be a small price to pay in defence of our inalienable right to hold and express an opinion.


Update:


Criticising halal meat is an 'obscene racial comment'. 

The State v The People - British Police Go Full PC

As it slowly dawns on the American people that their institutions have been politicized and are now being used against them it comes as no surprise to their British kith and kin across the Atlantic.

Their institutions were weaponized and used against them decades ago. These include national and local governments, the mainstream media led by the supposedly unbiased, taxpayer funded BBC, the supposedly neutral civil service and the supposed envy of the world, otherwise known as ‘our’ National Health Service (NHS).

The most notable, and regrettable, weaponized institution is the once respected Police Force who are now fully fledged agents of the state who’s mission to protect and serve the public by upholding the law has been abandoned in favor of imposing the governments agenda.

Now known as the ‘Police Service’ it is led by specially selected Common Purpose trained operatives who serve the political elite and who’s mission is to use political correctness to intimidate into conformity those members of the indigenous population who disagree with the government's agenda.

Crimes perpetrated by specific minority groups, including followers of the religion of peace, are ignored where possible and where prosecution cannot be avoided softer sentencing guidelines are applied in mitigation.

As crime rises across the country, including gun and knife crime, police ‘services’ are withdrawing cops from the streets and redeploying them to tackle crimes against political correctness.

Crimes against political correctness are vague and open to interpretation which leaves the police free to caution, investigate and arrest anyone who voices opposition to the government's agenda. By any measure this is intimidation worthy of any autocratic banana republic and not a modern democracy.

Recent headlines from the Sceptred Isle include:

Rise in recorded crime is accelerating in England and Wales.

Half of Brits haven’t seen a police officer on foot ALL YEAR.

Now police won’t visit even if your house was burgled.

Met Police to stop investigating some ‘low-level’ crimes in response to $400 million funding cuts.

Distribution of funds depends on the priorities set by local Police Commissioners and Senior Officers so one has to assume that crimes against ordinary people such as burglary are 'low level' and therefore not a priority, whereas so-called hate speech on Twitter and Facebook are very much so.

Police turn up at Tony Boxford’s door over Facebook post.

Online hate crime to be tackled by new national police hub.

When it comes to prioritizing police resources between tackling violent crime and political correctness the latter wins in Dyfed-Powys, Wales, where police are financing LGBT liaison officers throughout the service.

This is what it's like to be a LGBT liaison officer.

These officers have been specially trained to deal with matters of sexual orientation and gender identity to provide support for LGBT victims of crime, including hate crime, domestic abuse and sexual abuse.

According to the cultural Marxist disciples in charge of this phony police ‘service’, these aforementioned crimes are unique to the LGBT community thus deserving of funds or they don’t matter to cisgendered victims of the same crimes especially if they are white.

To conclude; politicians being the duplicitous, self-serving charlatans that they are will always put their own interests above those of the people and the country they are meant to serve.

Apart from outlawing so-called hate speech to intimidate dissenters into silence by accusing them of Islamophobia, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, etc. they are now adding criticism of themselves to the list.

When the political elite start making laws to protect themselves from criticism the line will have been crossed and civil disobedience will be the only recourse left for the disenfranchised people.
(See here)

Previous article on the demise of the British Bobby here

Cultural Marxists v President Trump - Let Battle Commence

I'll begin this article on a note of optimism that the main weapon in the armory of the Cultural Marxists i.e political correctness, has met its match with the election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America.

One of the unexpected, and enjoyable, benefits of his election has been watching heads explode among the liberal/socialist/progressive community as they have a collective mental breakdown. Their hysterical reaction to President Trump is proof positive that he was the right choice for the much abused silent majority in America.

The vast majority of people in America and the western countries are too busy earning a living and trying to survive the malign attentions of the Cultural Marxists to study the history of Gramsci and the political correctness revolution and how they usurped power. (An easy to read article on the subject here)

They will however be aware of the negative consequences of this malign attention because it affects every aspect of their lives every single day both covertly and overtly. It is effectively crushing the life out of their evolved culture and civilization.

Everything that symbolizes western culture and civilization, such as Christian festivals, flags and other emblems, are considered to be offensive and must therefore be banned. It has reached such a crescendo of viciousness that even white skin is considered to be offensive and is subsequently in the process of being stigmatized.

This is a dangerous development in the history of western civilization the consequences of which are unknown and potentially disastrous but I digress.

One only has to look back a decade or so to see the negative effects that rigidly policed political correctness has had on freedom of speech and of thought. People are reluctant to discuss anything outside of the imposed orthodoxy for fear of being labelled and smeared with charges of racism, xenophobia, homophobia, Islamophobia.

Even ridiculous titles such as Fascist and Nazi are being used with abandon in a last desperate attempt to smear and vilify anyone who supports the Trump Presidency.

The collective bottled up frustration of the American people was finally unleashed by the no-holds- barred, straight talking campaign of Donald Trump who said from the start that he doesn't do political correctness and America does not have time for it.

Incidentally, another enjoyable consequence of the Trump campaign was watching the bought-and-paid-for MSM whores and their pundits get their comeuppance. It was truly a joy to behold.

The battle will commence in earnest after the inauguration and bearing in mind the forces ranged against him this going to to be an epic and monumental struggle. With his determination and the support of his family and the American people he has every chance of emerging victorious.

Read 'Trump is the Exorcist of Political Correctness' here and be uplifted.

British Lose The Plot - Ban Trump But Welcome Mugabe Torturer

It's not the fact that the British Parliament debated whether to ban Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, from entering Great Britain that embarrassed the nation but the fact that so many legislators spoke in favour of the ban. They fell over each other in order put their left wing credentials on public display but unfortunately for them it also laid bare their total lack of intellectual integrity.

Wanting to ban the person who is leading the race to become the most powerful person on the planet only served to confirm what informed people had previously only suspected, that members of the modern British political class are bereft of any common sense or vision or to put it in the current popular vernacular, a total waste of space.

The debate was initiated by an online Parliamentary petition reaching the required number of signatures and therefore it was a legitimate subject but one would have thought that legislators would have used the opportunity to educate the signatories not only in the folly of their quest but the sheer hypocrisy contained therein.

Unfortunately, way too many British people have been so totally crushed by two decades of rigidly policed political correctness they actively look for the slightest excuse to attach labels on each other in order to win an argument.

The all time favourites are 'racist' and 'Islamophobe' which are pinned on anyone who holds different views on imposed 'multi-culturalism' to that of the 'progressive' metropolitan political elite and are not afraid to air them in public using their own style.

Donald Trump's particular thought crime was to suggest a moratorium on Muslim immigration until they can be properly vetted. In addition to this is his promise to build a wall to secure the porous southern border which has earned the displeasure of the Cultural Marxists that infest the global political establishment and the international government-media complex.

In their attempt to demonise Trump they ignored the fact that these remarks were made after the Muslim atrocities in Paris and San Bernadino. Also memories are still raw concerning other Muslim atrocities committed in the name Allah in places like Chattanooga, Fort Hood and the Boston marathon not to mention the Twin Towers on 9/11.

The porous southern border was also responsible for the murder of Kate Steinle, shot in the back while out walking with her father by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a violent illegal immigrant who had been deported on five previous occasions.

Unlike the agenda driven political class in Great Britain Donald Trump is making the safety and security of the American people a top priority as opposed to ignoring the violence, rape and murder perpetrated against the British people for reasons of political expediency.

Trump's remarks were labelled as 'hate speech' - a favourite term of the socialist/communist/liberal community better know by their adopted, inappropriate name of  'progressives' - and this is where their complete and utter hypocrisy shines through like a beacon.

There are thousands of examples of dangerous characters who have not only been allowed entry into Great Britain but have been supported in their vileness by taxpayer funded welfare benefits. Some of these sub-humans are as base as it's possible to be, compared to whom Donald Trump is an anointed Saint in God's Heaven.

The creature pictured above is Philip Machemedze, who enjoyed his previous role as torturer for blood soaked Zimbabwean tyrant, Robert Mugabe. Machemedze admitted being a cold blooded killer and rapist who enjoyed hacking the limbs of enemies so that they died slowly in agony.

(Read the shocking story here)

There are thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of similar cases whereby the most appalling and dangerous characters imaginable are allowed to stay in Great Britain paid for by taxpayer funded welfare benefits.

Here are two more I will use to illustrate the point.

Trump's common sense remarks on Muslim immigration and secure borders was classed as hate speech by those MP's that wanted him banned, however these same MP's remained silent on Mr. Abu Hamza. An illegal immigrant and welfare supported terrorist, he was an unrepentant al-Qaeda supporter who was allowed to openly spread his vile, anti-infidel hate speech in London for years without their comment. After fighting extradition for nearly a decade, again financed by the taxpayers, he now languishes in an America prison where he will hopefully meet his maker.


Osama bin Laden's right hand man in Europe and illegal immigrant, Mr.Abu Qatada, was labelled by the security services as 'extremely dangerous' but was allowed to stay for years living a normal life among the people he hated and plotted to kill. Like Abu Hamza this evil creature fought extradition for years and finally self-deported to his homeland in Jordan where he was wanted for terrorist related crimes.

It has been reported that if he doesn't get what the authorities consider a fair trial in Jordan the European Court of Human Rights would insist that Great Britain must take him back to resume his life of luxury and to take advantage of the freedoms he is committed to destroying.

The Parliamentary debate to ban Donald Trump from Great Britain - along with the missed opportunity to educate the low information petition signatories - is an embarrassment for the country but it is not entirely surprising. The new leader of the Labour Party is a Great Britain hating, life long communist, Jeremy Corbyn, who counts the leaders of terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah as his friends.

As a measure of how much the British people have lost the plot and are actively engineering their own oblivion, Corbyn's party has two-hundred and thirty-one Members of Parliament with a rag tag group of seventy-seven Members who share many of his aspirations. That's three-hundred and eight out of a total of six-hundred and fifty Members.

Great Britain needs its own version of Donald Trump because civilisation is indeed hanging by a thread in the Sceptred Isle.

Update: Romanian criminal allowed into Britain despite a string of convictions. Story here

Political Enemies And The MSM Unite To Smear The Peoples Party As Racist

It came as no surprise that the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, popularly known as UKIP, would shake the cosy consensus between the three old legacy parties, their bought and paid for media whores and the BBC, right through to its rotten core.

Never in my experience have I witnessed such a concerted effort by the established political class to insult, denigrate and smear a political party that polls less than ten percent of the popular vote in general elections.

This phenomenon not only raises some important issues with regard to the state of British democracy but it also highlights the yawning chasm between the cross party political class and the people they are supposedly representing.

The advent of the professional political class has been accompanied by the demise of democracy; this is particularly apparent by the fact that people enter politics nowadays, not as a public service or a sense of duty after a life long career in the real world, but straight from school as a lucrative, self serving pursuit of political power funded by the taxpayer.

It doesn't take an expert to notice that regardless of party affiliation they are all the same. They dress the same, they talk the same, they have the same mannerisms and they speak in a language dominated by centrally issued slogans and soundbites. They have all been trained in the black arts of media management, spin, deceit together with the ability to lie with a straight face.

They make false promises and lie without conscience to get themselves elected - they are bereft of any semblance of principle. Consequently it is no wonder that when a straight talking party enters the political fray, who accurately articulate the concerns of the people, they are attacked mercilessly by the united political order.

Short of throwing the kitchen sink at UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage, the political class and their media cronies have joined together out of mutual self interest to use every dirty trick in the book to discredit and smear the increasingly popular movement that promotes a return to national sovereignty, democracy and common sense by leaving that undemocratic disaster known as the European Union.

One of the things that becomes apparent by this concerted cross party smear campaign is the unwillingness of the party leaders to debate the issues - the reason being that they would lose, and lose humiliatingly, if judged by the debates between Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, and UKIP leader Nigel Farage.

If the other two party leaders, David Cameron and Red Ed Miliband are too cowardly to debate the leader of a minor political party, how in God's name can they stand up for the British people's interests against hardened political animals such as Russia's President Putin, China's Xi Jinping or Germany's Angela Merkel?

These two over promoted schoolkids would have difficulty extracting a minor concession from political pygmies of the Herman von Rumpuy/Jose Manuel Barrosso school of bureaucracy, let alone a political heavyweight.

They are unable to debate the issues therefore in the tradition of the new political class they resort to smear and there is no bigger smear at the moment in politically correct Great Britain than 'racist'. It must be the most over used word in the English language. It is thrown around at random on the flimsiest of excuses but unfortunately for the political class its over use is its downfall.

Its effectiveness is lessened the more its used, and in many circles it is becoming a badge of honour to be smeared as a racist by a member of the current political class. It's use as a smear to denigrate UKIP is having the opposite effect by galvanising support and its continued use merely reflects the fact that they have lost the debate on the issues.

The high profile defection of UKIP's so called rising star, Sanya-Jeet Thandi, has all the hallmarks of a set up, choreographed to cause maximum damage at a crucial point in the campaign.

The fact that this student from the radical left wing London School of Economics was openly advocating UKIP's immigration policy days before her defection, and then doing it via the ultra left wing Guardian newspaper, should dispel any doubt that this was choreographed. By her own logic, by promoting UKIP's long standing immigration policy she herself was a racist up until her defection.

There is no shortage of ambitious young ladies willing to volunteer for publicity generating scams such as this. I would suggest that Ms. Thandi has political aspirations and like others before her she is willing to indulge in a publicity generating controversy in order to raise her profile - and make some easy baksheesh in the process.

It was only recently that an obscure actress, Somi Guha was put up to suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC in blaze of publicity, in hope of resurrecting her failed acting career while making some easy money in the process. Indian national Ms. Guha was apparently offended by Clarkson's use of the word 'slope' which has no connotations with Indian people whatsoever. Obviously controversies generated by the word 'racist' can be very lucrative as well as career enhancing.

Nobody should be surprised if Ms. Thandi reappears in the not too distant future as an ethnic rising star in one of the established parties. Hopefully it will be with the Liberal Democrats where her treacherous career will be mercifully short.

The latest 'racist' controversy artificially generated by the established political order, ruthlessly executed by the media in order to smear UKIP and cause maximum damage, is the row over an Afghan community ignoring a planning ruling by a North London local authority, safe in the knowledge they will get away it.

Local UKIP candidate, Heino Vockradt gave his view on the issue, not in centrally issued slogans or soundbites but in a forthright language everyone can understand.

With reference to the Afghans ignoring the ruling which has resulted in non Muslims being squeezed out of a shopping street in his area, he correctly states that:

"Political correctness is preventing the council from taking action for fear of being called racist, when, just like in all other cases where Muslims are grooming children to be sex slaves under the eyes of the authorities, the council does nothing".

(He is refering to the local authorities in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and other cites in England who ignored Muslim paedophile gangs as they groomed under age white girls before subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse)

Echoing the experience of thousands of communities the length and breadth of the country, Vockradt states that:

"The neighbourhood was already exploding under the weight of segregation, shopkeepers are being squeezed out by Muslims. The entire parade - once lovely owner/occupier shops - resembles Helmand Province".

He went on to state state correctly, and echoing the words of Sir Winston Churchill highlighted in yesterdays post that:

"Islam is a mono-cultural, totalitarian ideology. It is not a religion. It is against multi-culturalism and only promotes its own culture. It is against everything modern Britain stands for".

Right on cue, the Labour leader of the council in question, Mohammed Butt, gave us a pearl of his wisdom using a dogeared, vintage soudbite from the Blair/ Mandelson era.

"In Brent we draw strength from our diversity and the vibrancy that it brings".

You really couldn't make this stuff up.

This kind of candid talk is forbidden in politically correct Britain for fear that the truth will resonate with the electorate, therefore the established political order stamp on it early through their dirty tricks department in order to shut down the debate. The weapon of choice of course is a smear using the word 'racist'.

What the political order fail to understand is that the people have learned by bitter experience the the comments made by the candidate are true, therefore they do resonate with the electorate and the 'racist' smear only hardens the support for UKIP.

In conclusion I will state that it is my fervent wish that support for UKIP holds up in the face of this unprecidented onslaught of dirty tricks and smear and that an electoral earthquake gives the political class a shock from which it will never recover.

Here a racist, there a racist, everywhere a racist racist. A great article from across the pond.

Offended Immigrant Sues Jeremy Clarkson And Wants BBC To Drop Top Gear

One of the endearing characteristics of the long suffering British people is their placid acceptance of ingrates who have abandoned their home countries to enjoy the benefits of British hospitality then do nothing but complain about the host nation's way of life when it doesn't meet their expectations.

News that a little known Indian actress is suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC for a perceived insult to an ethnic group of which she does not belong should come as no surprise to anyone outside of the political correctness industry. It is also beyond obvious why this particular ingrate is taking the action that she is.

To say that Somi Guha's film career is non existent would be an understatement.  When the opportunity arose to make some easy money, and enhance her public profile in the process, she must have thought it was her birthday and Diwali rolled into one. The photograph that was used to front this lawsuit was hardly that of a grossly offended victim of bigotry but more of a failed actress using the best image in her portfolio to attract attention.

The lawsuit itself doesn't smell right. It claims that Ms. Guha has instructed lawyers at the trendy, 'right on' law firm Equal Justice, to sue Clarkson and the BBC for a million pounds.

Firstly, the alleged insult used the word 'slope' which refers to those of East Asian origin such as Japanese, Vietnamese or, as in this case, Burmese - she herself is an Indian therefore there are no grounds for her to be offended.

Secondly, where a little known actress gets the money to instigate a law suit is a mystery. She cannot possibly be offended to the point that she would risk her own treasure unless she was put up to it by a vested interest willing to fill her coffers and raise her public profile in order to censor Jeremy Clarkson.

For her information, Top Gear is one of the most popular programmes on the planet and Jeremy Clarkson one of the most popular presenters. The programme uses laddish or schoolboy humour and everyone knows it is irreverent and non politically correct.  If this is not to Ms. Guha's liking then she shouldn't watch it.

Switching off or changing channels is one of the benefits of living in a free country and it can be achieved using a remote control from the comfort of ones own armchair.

Immigrants demanding that the British people change their way of life and their attitudes in order to accommodate theirs has resulted in any Tom, Dick or Abdul taking action against the very people who gave them sanctuary and the opportunity to enjoy a better life than in their home country.

It is sad to note that oppressive political correctness, 'hate crime' laws and intimidation by organized smear units, prevents the majority of British people from revealing what they really think.  Being a dissenter I refuse to be intimidated by the establishment and I couldn't care less about being prosecuted.

However much I am vilified and accused of being a racist, I am not one;  I just happen to disagree with the current political class about open border mass immigration and I do not believe there is such a thing as a functioning multi-cultural society.

In the interests of community cohesion and cultural enrichment, I will try to help Ms. Guha, and other immigrants, to understand some of the harmless quirks of the British people that they should accept as guests. If they intend to settle in Great Britain they should adopt these little quirks and pass them on to future generations.

We British are self deprecating, we laugh and poke fun at each other, we call each other names and are not offended. We were brought up with a proverb which they should teach their own children:

"Sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me".

If you plan to settle in Great Britain I suggest you get used to it - its what we do, its part of our national character, its who we are and no amount of litigation, legislation or whining will change it. If you can't accept it then maybe Great Britain is not the place for you.

Here is a list of names and cat calls where no malice is intended and no offence is taken until the PC police undertook to impose their multi-cultural agenda:

Scottish people - Jocks, Tartan Terrorists, Ginger Mingers, Wife beaters

English people - Limeys (also generic British when abroad), Whinging Poms (By Australians) Stick your f*cking chariots up your a*rse is a quaint Welsh rugby chant.

Welsh people - Taffy's, Pit Boys, Pit Ponies. Morlocks, and my particular favourite, Sheep Sh*ggers.( This is my own ethnic group, I have been called all of these names and worse and never taken offence)

North East English People - Geordies

Liverpool people - Scousers

Then there's Mancs, Brummies, Kentish Men and Men of Kent.

Irish people - Paddy's, Bog Hoppers, Leprechauns, Micks

American people - Yanks, Sceptics ( rhyming slang based on sceptic tank)

Jewish people - Yids or 4x2's ( Rhyming slang again)

Gypsies - Gypos, Pikies and Didicoys for the flower selling variety.

British people never go for a Chinese meal, they always go for a Chinky.

No ethnic group should be surprised or offended if the indigenous British people give them a nickname.

Sledging and name calling on the field of sport is legendary and some of it is hair curling stuff. Listening to what Mohamed Ali called his opponents would send the serially offended running to their lawyers in fits of apoplexy wanting financial compensation for their own hurt feelings.

There are also names, some unflattering, for tall people, short, fat, thin, fast, slow and so on.

One of the more irritating aspects of the serially offended community is their taking of offence on behalf of other people who are not themselves offended. This gives the said community blanket coverage to be permanently offended and therefore an opportunity to impose political correctness, Cultural Marxism to give it its proper name,  and in effect censor unorthodox opinions.

One would have thought that being an Indian, and an actress to boot, she would make sure that her own house was in order before entering someone else's demanding they change their ways.

Bollywood, the world famous Indian film industry is renown for offending and insulting minorities particularly Sikhs and Muslims with women being a particular target.

It is not racist of me to suggest that Ms.Guha return to her native land and sue her socks off to end discrimination against women, lower caste people and immigrants who, incidentally, are only trying to make a living.

One of the most discriminated against minorities are Christians who unjustly make up six percent of India's prison population.

Excuses for Ms.Guha to issue law suits are in abundance in India where discrimination on the basis of gender and caste is legendary. Offensive and insulting names such as Dalit and Harijan are in common usage - Gandhi himself objected to the names, Harijan and Untouchables, being used for his fellow Indian citizens.

Ms. Guha could be offended and sue on behalf of the African community in Mumbai who are on the receiving end of appalling abuse and discrimination. Read the story of Nigerian Sambo Davis here.

Incidentally, referring to an African gentleman as 'Sambo' is taboo and grounds for a law suit so please Ms. Guha, instruct your lawyers to sue away.

The fact is that according to The Hindu newspaper,  Somi Guha's home country is rife with racism, discrimination and name calling so with that in mind I will articulate what the majority of British people are thinking; before you start agitating on your own or a vested interests behalf to change the British people's way of life, you should go back to your own country and put that right first.

Clarissa Dickson-Wright, Tony Benn And Bob Crow - A Rose Between Two Thorns

The passing of that great British icon, Clarissa Dickson-Wright, came hot on heels of two other celebrity bucket kickers - firstly trade union thug and unrepentant communist, Bob Crow, followed by Great Britain's most notorious champagne socialist and fellow unrepentant communist, Anthony Wedgwood Benn.

The reaction to the passing of these three high profile personalities couldn't have been more different.  The political establishment in the Westminster bubble, together with their sycophants in the media, were queuing up to eulogise the two anti- British revolutionaries is in stark contrast to their virtual silence on the passing of the universally popular, pro-British, politically incorrect TV chef.

One can understand that people who share an ideology with Crow and Benn will say nice things about them, but it is unbecoming of their political opponents and those who should be fighting communism to be eulogizing this thug and his comrade in such glowing terms.

One can only assume that people such as Prime Minister, David Cameron and London's conservative Mayor, Boris Johnson, were trawling for 'working class' votes in their leadership bids by not telling the truth about this reprobate and his upper class twit of a soul mate.

One shouldn't be surprised that the taxpayer funded BBC, and the hideously left wing hacks at the Guardian, went into full 'Nelson Mandela' mode, but the Spectator really should know better. The fight against the horrors of communism and its advocates should be a full time occupation for those that support individual liberty and freedom with no room for sentimentality or any concessions for people like Crow and Benn.

When one reads that Crow stood up for the working man, or that he stuck to his working class roots, the authors are either deluding themselves or they are deliberately distorting the truth for their own personal ends.

Bob Crow stood up for only those working people that paid their dues to his union, he didn't care a jot for the millions of working people who were unable to get to their jobs because of his interminable strikes on the London Underground.  He certainly didn't care about the working people who suffered intimidation and vile abuse from his members when they exercised their legal right to go to work.

Like all champagne socialists, he didn't stick to his working class roots either - while his strikers were bringing London to a standstill and intimidating those of his members that chose to work, Crow was far from the picket line, enjoying the sunshine on the beaches of Rio de Janeiro.

Living in publicly subsidized housing doesn't make you working class either or mean you've kept your working class roots, especially when one is on a six figure salary plus expenses and perks, paid out of his member's dues.

Bob Crow was an unrepentant communist who supported Palestinian terrorism and the disastrous Hugo Chavez communist regime in Venezuela - one of his heroes was the blood soaked despot, Fidel Castro, and he stated that he would like to see a Cuban type revolution in Great Britain.  My guess would be that instead of manning the barricades, Crow would be sunning himself somewhere as far from the action as it would be possible to get.

When London Mayor, Boris Johnson said of Crow that "he was a fighter and a man of character. There can be no doubt that he played a big part in the success of the Tube, and shared my goal to make transport in London an even greater success", he had obviously forgotten the millions of Londoners that Crow had inconvenienced or his sentiment that Johnson's former leader Margaret Thatcher should "rot in hell".

Aristocrat Anthony Wedgwood Benn was a clown of a character who thought that by renouncing his peerage and proletarianising his name to Tony Benn it would make him a member of the working class.  Benn's passionate advocacy of Marxism didn't stretch to actually giving up the bourgeois lifestyle and joining the proletariat - in typical caviar communist fashion, Benn kept as far away from the great unwashed as possible.

One anecdote has our hero travelling in a second class railway carriage when there were seats available in first class; when asked by the conductor why he was travelling in second class he reputedly replied "because there is no third class".

This kind of tokenism doesn't make him working class - it makes him a clown. Using the same logic, one is entitled to ask why he chose to live in Holland Park, one of London's most exclusive areas, instead of a working class area such as Southall or Broadwater Farm?

Benn had an exclusive upbringing and all the advantages that wealth and privilege brings, including private schooling.  In his attempts to become a member of the proletariat he erased all references to his exclusive education from Who's Who, removing his entry all together in later editions.

Volumes have been written about Benn so I leave it to the reader to explore this buffoon at their leisure but I will use a few quotes to help illustrate his extremism.

"Marxism is now a world faith and must be allowed to enter into a continuous dialogue with other world faiths, including religious faith".

"It would be unthinkable to construct a Labour party without Marx....."

"A faith is something you die for; a doctrine is something you kill for; there is all the difference in the world". If it came down to killing it would be a safe bet that both Crow and Benn would make their excuses and be somewhere else away from any action.

It would be safe to say that Clarissa Dickson-Wright had more adoring followers than either Bob Crow or Wedgwood Benn.  She also represented a vision of England that more people identified with than the communist dystopias espoused by the Toytown revolutionaries who enjoyed the bourgeois lifestyle of the very people they claim to despise.

Like Benn, Clarissa was born into privilege but unlike him she remained the person she was born, warts and all - she never felt the need to create a false persona in order to endear herself to the people. She was irreverent and politically incorrect which is the reason why, despite her huge following, she is being ignored by the political elite.

They lived in fear of her popularity and the negative effect that she was having on the imposition of their politically correct agenda.  She represented everything about Great Britain and England that they are trying to destroy.  This is an important reason why her memory should be kept alive for as long as possible, even in the age of the twenty four hour news cycle.

For millions of people, myself included, Clarissa Dickson-Wright stands head and shoulders above the likes of Crow and Benn, whose only wish was to destroy the Great Britain that she represented and replace it with the dull, miserable, blood soaked world of Marx, Castro, Chavez et al.

In the spirit in which I was brought up I offer condolences to the families of all three of the departed but I extend my eternal thanks to Clarissa Dickson-Wright for standing up to the death threats and intimidation of the politically correct bullies and staying true to herself.

Here is a previous post on Clarissa and some of her life in quotes for readers to enjoy.

 A sample to whet your appetite:

"There were several members of the future Labour Cabinet in my circle, including Tony Blair himself. We called him Miranda, not least because of his long hair and girlish looks. He was regarded as a poor, sad thing and considered something of a fantasist".

Update: A fitting tribute here

   

The Mighty Google Caves In To Censorship And Political Correctness Again

To the old adage that death and taxes are the only two certainties in this world I will add a third, it is certain that when politicians feel threatened they will censor.

It goes without saying that the Internet is greatest invention since the printing press, possibly the greatest invention ever when it comes to freedom and individual liberty.  It allows ordinary citizens access to news and information free from the spin and sanitizing that is being carried out by those that have usurped political power and corrupted it for their own ends.

Freedom of information combined with citizens having access to opinions outside of the incestuous political cesspit puts the fear of God into every political charlatan who has a lust for power or an agenda to impose.

After some piece of information was leaked into the public domain, one appointed European Union bureaucrat was quoted as saying that something must be done about the Internet because "we cannot have unregulated opinion".

This chap was obviously a communist party apparatchik recently emerged from one of the former Soviet bloc countries. The EU bureaucracy is infested with these idiots who have lived all their lives with press censorship, state broadcasting and official communiques.

Coming to the west and having to justify his policies, instead of imposing them and imprisoning anyone who had the temerity to ask a question, must have been a shock to his system. How he must long for those good old days of censorship and "regulated opinion".

What is dangerous for freedom loving nations and those people that value their individual liberty is that the traditional western politicians and their attendant bureaucrats are adopting the attitudes of their eastern counterparts when it comes to public information and opinions.

To counter the access of information by ordinary citizens there has been an explosive increase in spin doctors, media management professionals and outright propagandists. There is not an industry or government department that doesn't employ an army of spin doctors. Even individual departments within an industry has its own compliment of spin doctors and media managers.

The problem for the political class and their bureaucrats is that their spin doctors and media managers are no longer having the desired effect. Masses of previously uninformed people are learning to think for themselves and stubbornly refusing to believe official information and "regulated opinion".

This is a very dangerous situation indeed for the political class and their response so far has been limited to crude attempts at censorship. The Leverson Inquiry into press freedom is a classic example of politicians using spurious incidents in an attempt to subject the press to government control.

In this case they used phone hacking and celebrity privacy as the excuse to censor the press, even though phone hacking is a criminal offence where the perpetrators could have been prosecuted. Using the underhand tactics to which we the people have become accustomed, instead of prosecuting the hackers the political class censored the press.

With the written press subject to government control the precedent has been established therefore they can now turn their attention to the real enemy. This is the Internet and its armies of citizen journalists sharing their "unregulated opinions" with a global audience.

The "unregulated opinions" and the unofficial language in which they are framed is effective in raising awareness of issues and attitudes that the political class would rather not be aired or discussed. They have resorted to abusing all the power they can muster to force Internet providers into politically correct conformity.

Google have rolled over and given in to political pressure and have removed search suggestions for British cities that are considered to be politically incorrect by the agenda driven fanatics that dominate British life.

As a measure of their fanaticism for their multi-cultural agenda, the political class and its agents are increasing their use of political correctness to close down any discussion that might raise awareness of their malign intentions for Great Britain and the west.

Typing "Why is"..followed by a cities name and its ethnic group is laughingly referred to as "vile racist search suggestions".

Its a well know tactic of the authoritarian multi-cultural fanatics to call any negative reference to race and ethnicity as "vile", particularly if it refers to non white and non Christian groups.

One example quoted in the article was the search,  "Why is Bradford full of Pakis". This is being classed as a vile racist search suggestion but would typing in the words  "Why is Cardiff full of Taffy's" be considered as vile racism? I am a Welshman and I am not offended in the slightest nor do I consider it a "vile racist search suggestion".

Everyone should know by now that Bradford is actually full of Pakistanis, therefore are searches such as "Why is Glasgow full Jock's" or " Why is Dublin full of Paddy's"  vile racist search suggestions?

What would our American cousins think of  "Why is New York full of Yanks" or better still "Why is Tennessee full of Hillbillies".

Sexuality is bound to be the next target with "Why is Brighton full of homosexuals" or "Why is San Fransisco full of freaks and weirdo's".

It is a shame that the people who run Google didn't stand firm in the interests of free speech and liberty by telling the political class, together with its attendant armies of sycophantic bureaucrats, where to stick their censorship and political correctness.

I assume that there are some astute people at Google who should know that these fanatics will never ever give up the pursuit of their perverted agenda and sooner or later Google will have to make a stand.

The alternative is to hand over the running of your company to the state apparatus and the freedom for individuals around the world to discuss the issues that they want to discuss and in the manner in which they want to discuss them, will be lost to the fanatical proponents of political correctness and  "regulated opinion".

Washington Redskins And The Yid Army - Political Correctness Lunacy Crosses The Atlantic

I consider myself fortunate that since I quit work I am able spend time living in both the USA and my home town in South Wales.  One of the advantages of this arrangement is the ability to observe first hand the policies being imposed by both countries simultaneously in order to facilitate a 'fundamental transformation'.  It has always been my contention that this transformation is meant for the entire Anglosphere rather than just Great Britain and the USA, therefore it would come as no surprise to learn if these same policies were being imposed in the rest of the civilized world including Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc.

Many people remain skeptical of New World Order conspiracy theories but the imposition of 'progressive' policies across the Anglosphere simultaneously suggests some measure of global coordination.

Is it really stretching incredulity too far to suggest that the expansion of government and welfare dependency financed by penal levels of taxation, across the Anglosphere simultaneously, is down to coincidence. This also applies to cultural replacement via open border mass immigration, the ending of traditional marriage, the human rights and overseas aid grievance industries, etc. etc.

The most potent weapon in the armoury of the 'progressive' transformers is rigidly enforced political correctness, otherwise known as Cultural Marxism. Its destructive power is enormous and if anyone is in any doubt about its effectiveness then they only need to compare the Great Britain of today with that of a couple of decades ago.

The country is unrecognizable and much of this is down to fear of transgressing the diktats of what can only be described as the government's thought police. Political correctness is everywhere, it is all pervading, it rules and ruins lives, it rules by fear: fear is the new element of the people, they eat it for breakfast, lunch and dinner, they breath it every waking moment. Political correctness has crippled the people to the extent that they have lost the will to fight back.

What is noticeable is that British style rigidly enforced political correctness has made its way across the Atlantic and is now being visited upon the American people with a vengeance.

News that the Washington Redskins football team are being pressured by the 'progressive' elite to change their name, as it is deemed to be offensive, is a classic use of political correctness by an agenda driven minority to intimidate the majority.

At the same time the 'progressive' useful idiots at Tottenham Hotspur Football Club in London (that means soccer in Great Britain) are ordering their supporters to remove the word 'Yid' from their songbook of chants under threat of prosecution.

It must be noted that the word 'Yid' is used with pride in order to commemorate the Jewish heritage of the club, even though it would appear that the Jewish influence is long gone. It must also be noted that the Tottenham area of London is popular with immigrants, particularly from the Caribbean.

The supporters of Tottenham Hotspur have called themselves the Yid Army for generations but suddenly Afro-Caribbeans referring to themselves as Yids is somehow offensive to the politically correct zealots of the 'progressive' community.

In reality the zealots are not offended in the slightest but are using the popularity of the English Premier League to push their political agenda and at the same time demonstrate their power to bully the majority into acquiescence.

This tactic has not been lost on the 'progressive' transformers across the pond. "Never let a good crisis go to waste" says Rahm Emmanuel, President Obama's previous enforcer, when attempting to impose their destructive agenda on the American people. It's a similar principle with large crowds as is evidenced by the Nuremberg rallies in pre war Germany.

Sporting crowds provide a mass captive audience that can be used for pushing a political agenda and the opportunity to do so is not going to go to waste by the 'progressive' transformers.

This issue also highlights the tremendous influence that the 'progressive' minority has over American life. Redskins spokesman, Roger Goodhall, wrote a letter to Congress defending their nickname, rightly calling it a "unifying force that stands for strength, courage, pride and respect". In a normal world that would make any American Indian proud to be associated with the club but notice how he changes his tune after he succumbed to pressure from God knows who. Goodhall is now saying that "if one person is offended we have to listen". This is a classic politically correct attitude if ever there was one.

Again, in a normal world if one person is offended by the name it would be tough luck, don't go to Redskin's games or patronize their brand; go follow another club. Sadly this is not a normal world any longer and one person objecting could mean millions having to adapt and change to placate.

As is the case in Great Britain, the useful idiots will never stop. British soccer crowds are subjected to endless campaigns such as 'Kick racism out of football', despite racism not being a big issue today. 'Drink responsibly' is another nagging slogan despite football clubs being sponsored by drinks companies. These patronizing idiots never miss an opportunity to lecture grown adults while they are going about their Saturday afternoon business.

If the Redskins acquiesce and change their name it will signal the beginning of an onslaught of political correctness that will change the face of American sport. If the serially offended industry win over the Redskin's name then they will most definitely be offended by:

The Kansas City Chiefs

The Cleveland Browns

The Cincinnati Reds

American Indians will be further offended by the Dallas Cowboys

Atheists will be offended by the Saints, the Padres, the Angels or the Cardinals even though it's a bird.

The Temperance movement will be offended by the Brewers.

Animal rights loonies and Peta will be offended by the Buffalo Bills.

All 'progressive' useful idiots and self loathers will be offended by the word 'Patriot' so it looks like New England will be needing a new moniker also.

As usual there is always a light amongst the gloom and a reason for hope. The Tottenham Hotspur supporters have indicated they will ignore the ban and continue to refer to themselves as the Yid Army.

They are also planning to wear Yid Army T-shirts at their future games. Lets hope they follow through with these intentions and send a message to the politically correct authoritarians in both Great Britain and the United States of America.

'We Will Not Listen, We Will Disobey, Go Jump In The Nearest Lake.

Update: It didn't take long before the suggestions started coming in.

The Redskins could change their name to the Foreskins to commemorate the d*cks who are pushing this agenda.

Apologies if the Yid Army are offended.


    

Corrupt Police A Laughing Stock - Establishment Foot Soldiers Declare War On The People

It is without doubt that the British people are living among the ruins of a once great civilization and that civilisation was deliberately destroyed by a self serving elite who committed this act of cultural vandalism without the peoples consent.

Governments of all shades played their part in this destruction including that of Margaret Thatcher who must be held accountable for handing over huge tracts of the people's sovereignty to the unelected bureaucrats of the European Union.

The destruction started in earnest under the Blair government post 1997 when, with malice aforethought, his government set about destroying or at least infiltrating and perverting every British institution from the NHS to the BBC; from the Church of England to the Police Force.  Despite the serious consequences of political interference in the aforementioned institutions it is the perversion of the Police Force that causes the most concern.

Many of my generation will recall the local copper or Bobby, living in the community walking his 'beat' with only a truncheon and a whistle. They were approachable, they applied the law evenly and took their vocation of public service seriously.

Compare that with the ignorant unaccountable bullies that infest the 'police service' today. There are still decent coppers in the force but unfortunately they are outnumbered by the ignoramuses that serve their political masters without question and who rigidly police political correctness rather than the criminal fraternity.

The politicized police have abandoned the people they are meant to protect and serve as they have been given the freedom to selectively apply the law depending on its relevance to the cultural replacement agenda.

The disciples of the new 'progressive' agenda have turned the world, and logic itself, on its head by turning the criminal into the victim. The victim who protects his personal property from the criminal is now the criminal himself. The police will no longer attend a burglary in progress because of its low priority, they may not even perform a timely investigation afterwards, but they will turn out in force immediately for a crime against political correctness.

Apparently the new 'police service' have a zero tolerance to perceived crimes against equality and fairness which makes people of any self appointed special interest group untouchable. Indigenous people are already guilty if they come into conflict with any of these groups, which include ethnic minorities, LGBT's, Muslims, Gypsies, asylum seekers, foxes, badgers etc. ad nauseum.

The new politicized 'police service' is run by fully paid up members of the establishment and they are an important part of the replacement machinery; to this end they are totally corrupt and they always look after their fellow 'progressives' no matter how obvious the crime .

Their behavior confirms this and it is worth looking at some examples which not only demonstrates this point but also proves that what was once a great public institution is now a total laughing stock.

One of the most important institutions in the cultural replacement agenda is the BBC which most people now accept is a publicly funded propaganda arm of the government. The biggest and most horrific scandal in its history was the Jimmy Savile led paedophile gangs which went about raping and abusing under age girls for decades with the full knowledge of the management.

After a year there has been a lot faux outrage, spin and obfuscation but only one conviction and then only 15 months jail time for some the most horrific crimes against children. Honourable Members are now demanding a new inquiry.

The police initially refused to investigate in the BBC pay off scandal whereby executives helped themselves to twenty five million pounds of taxpayers money with impunity. After public pressure they were forced to investigate but, surprise, surprise, they came up with nothing.

Just to help the cops out, former Chief Executive George Entwhistle's friends at the BBC awarded him a four hundred and fifty thousand pounds (450,000) payoff after only fifty four days in the job. He resigned in disgrace due to what many regarded as criminal incompetence and his payoff was twenty five thousand over the legal amount due.

In one of the most blatant examples of police corruption was the case of establishment Member of Parliament David Laws. This low life is a multi-millionaire who was rich enough to retire at the tender age of twenty eight. He stole over fifty thousand pounds from the public, supposedly because he didn't want his mother or his constituents to find out he had a homosexual lover.

The public in these tolerant times will be more concerned with his integrity as opposed to his sexuality so that is no excuse whatsoever. David Laws, being an establishment MP and a homosexual, is a member of a protected species and is therefore untouchable. Other MP's were prosecuted for thieving but not this one. The police had all the evidence they needed to put this guy away but they obeyed their political masters and refused to do so.

This criminal thieving low life is now back in government working in the Ministry of Education. Teaching children the subtle arts of stealing from the public and getting away with it no doubt.

If anyone was in any doubt just how low the 'police service' will sink in order to play their part in the cultural replacement agenda then the Muslim paedophile scandals should put their doubts at rest.

What kind of people run a 'police service' that would allow Muslim paedophile gangs to subject under age white girls to horrific sexual abuse on the grounds of 'cultural sensitivities'?  These so called public servants are behaving like animals themselves.

The war by the 'police service' against the public is what makes them a laughing stock and it has cost them their last shred of credibility. Out of the hundreds of examples here are a few to demonstrate the point. Use the links then laugh or cry whichever emotion comes first:

Mounted police officer arrested Oxford student Sam Brown who was then prosecuted for calling his horse gay. Teenager Kyle Lettes was arrested and prosecuted for playfully growling at a dog.

Police were called to a burglary in progress where a previously deported serial criminal from Romania was in the process of stealing private property from a business. The victims pleaded with the police to arrest the thieving swine but they refused due to health and safety concerns as he was on the roof at the time.

The owners, Stephen Llife and his son Daniel, caught him themselves and were promptly arrested for attempted murder which was reduced later to grievous bodily harm with intent. They were put through nine months of unnecessary stress for no other reason than the police no longer serve the public.

No essay on the new politically correct 'police service' would be complete without the hilarious sight of our brave boys in blue running away from a mob of Muslim demonstrators who are issuing blood curdling threats that would get any non-Muslim arrested and thrown in the slammer.

By the same token one thousand police officers did battle with three hundred demonstrators from the English Defence League and arrested fourteen for demonstrating against the Islamification of their country.

The once respected police force has now been replaced by the new politicized 'police service' who are tasked with policing political correctness and showing zero tolerance to anyone who disagrees with the cultural replacement agenda. It is a sad state of affairs that the  people will look the other way and abandon a police officer to his fate if he is on the receiving end of violence.

They brought this on themselves when they in turn abandoned the people at the behest of their political masters.