Elton John's Perfect Family - A Positive Image For Gay Marriage

One of Great Britain's highest selling newspapers, along with its online version, published a gushing article recently titled "Portrait Of A Perfect Marriage", an intimate story detailing the courtship, loving marriage and idyllic family life of Sir Elton John and his partner/wife/husband David Furnish.

The article's over use of sugary language to describe their union makes one wonder if this isn't the most idyllic marriage ever in the history human relationships.

The Daily Mail article on May 19th informs the reader that it was eleven years ago this month that Sir Elton proposed to David, thus formalizing a relationship that - as the world knows - has blossomed into one of the most blissfully happy of show business marriages.

Apparently we know this because they have been generous enough to share almost every detail of their perfect family life with articles and interviews in celebrity magazines and high profile TV interviews.

Untainted by even a whiff of scandal or impropriety this truly wonderfully loving couple makes all other celebrity relationships appear insincere by comparison.

The article highlights their deep love for each other with David confirming that that he is committed to Sir Elton, the person he wants to spend the rest of his life with.

Surprisingly in the same 19th May edition the Daily Mail ran a second article on Sir Elton John and David Furnish who posed for the cameras after enjoying a meal together at a top London restaurant.


Along with the marriage of celebrity chef Jamie Oliver and Jools Norton, the marriage of David Beckham and Victoria 'Posh Spice' Adams are portrayed by the media as examples of successful scandal free celebrity marriages. They are of course heterosexual unions so in this age of overt political correctness there needs to be a counterbalance and the John/Furnish union not only fulfills that purpose but it gives succour to the ever more powerful gay lobby and their imposition of the LGBT agenda.

The sudden doubling down and fawning over the Elton John/David Furnish idyllic marriage and family life on May 19th is open to speculation but one can only come away the idea that this couple
and their families are as normal, natural and idyllic as as the Oliver and Beckham unions.

(Read the gushing Mail articles here and here)

                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other important news on May19th:

UK Supreme Court Upholds 'Celebrity Threesome' Injunction

Despite being widely known everywhere else on the planet, including Scotland and Ireland, the Supreme Court judges have ruled to censor the press and deny the right of the people of England and Wales to know the true nature of a celebrity couple's marriage allowing instead for the media created image of  perfection to prevail.

According to reports, one half of the celebrity marriage took part in a depraved sexual encounter with another couple who were happy for the issue to be made public. Apparently, this exposure would have shattered the carefully nurtured public image of an idyllic marriage and happy family life.

'Think of the children' is another threadbare excuse for the judges to censor the truth. Exposing the truth would hurt the children who, apparently, believe the image makers as opposed to the truth about one of their parents.

It is worth noting that despite there being children involved, similar injunctions to censor extra- marital sexual encounters involving married people have been refused. This includes high profile football players John Terry and Ryan Giggs, BBC broadcaster Andrew Marr and former Top Gear presenter Jeremy Clarkson.

(See here)

In conclusion, equal justice under the law is a centuries old British tradition and requires consistency of those responsible for its application.

In the interests of British justice, lifting the injunction would be the right thing to do and if celebrities want to avoid negative publicity they should not cheat on their partners and more importantly their children by indulging in improper sexual relations.

The Truth About Romanian Neighbours - MSM Hypocrisy During Smear Campaign

The coordinated campaign by the political elite to smear the new kids on the block, who are threatening to end their decades long hold on power, is moving from the hysterical to the downright laughable.

The popularity of the United Kingdom Independence Party, UKIP, has put the fear of God into this corrupt political elite to the point where their desperation to make the charge of 'racist' stick is exposing their hypocrisy for all to see.

UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, spoke the truth when being goaded and browbeaten by hostile LBC radio show host James O'Brien when he indicated that it is mainly Romanian immigrants that are responsible for the crime wave that is blighting the lives of the British people and that he would prefer to have German, as opposed to Romanian, neighbours.

The modus operandi of the media during this campaign has been to seize on any remark that refers to a nationality and distort in order to portray UKIP and Nigel Farage as racist. On orders from their political masters the editor and so called 'journalists' of the popular Daily Mail newspaper led the charge, assuming that the public will have forgotten their previous articles on the scourge of Romanian immigrants that are trashing some of London's most iconic landmarks and causing havoc among communities in some of Great Britain's cities, including other settled immigrant communities.

Here is a Daily Mail report on the seven hundred and fifty foreign criminals including violent robbers, rapists, drug dealers and killers, who are on the streets of Great Britain because the EU will not allow the government to deport them. Is the Daily Mail guilty of stirring up animosity against foreigners or reporting the truth like Nigel Farage?

Read the Daily Mail's report on Romanian beggars in London and decide if Nigel Farage's comments are justified or is he being a racist.

This is a Daily Mail report on a Roma gang who used young girls as sex slaves subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse. Read this and decide if Nigel Farage is speaking the truth or being racist.

Another Daily Mail report on the how the influx of Roma from Slovakia are blighting the lives of people in Sheffield to such an extent that the former Labour Home Secretary, David Blunkett is warning of race riots. It must be remembered that David Blunkett was a senior member of Tony Blair's government that opened the borders to all and sundry in the first place.

This Daily Mail report highlights the fact that one in four serious crimes in Great Britain are committed by foreigners.

Read these articles and decide not only if Nigel Farage was speaking the truth or being a racist but would you prefer to have these people or Germans as your neighbours?

These articles are proof, if any were needed, that the Daily Mail is rife with hypocrisy and is playing its part along with the rest of the media in the coordinated campaign of insult and smear against UKIP and Nigel Farage.

The Daily Mail, the BBC and the rest of the media are claiming that they are only doing their duty by subjecting the policies and candidates of UKIP to scrutiny - in a proper functioning democracy this would be the right thing to do but the ad hominem personal attacks and attempts at portraying UKIP and Nigel Farage as racist is anything but scrutiny.

Compare the pathetically soft treatment of Labour supporting drug abuser and pervert, Paul Flowers by the BBC's supposed attack dog, Jeremy Paxman with his indignant sneering at Nigel Farage.

It must be borne in mind that Methodist preacher Reverend Paul Flowers used illegal drugs, crystal meth, Ketamin and party drug GHB in industrial quantities and indulged in three-in-a bed orgies with rent boys while leading the so called ethical Coop Bank into bankruptcy. This behavior put in jeopardy the savings and livelihoods of millions of members and stakeholders including millions of ordinary working class people.

If the BBC and media had put establishment politicians under the same scrutiny as Nigel Farage then maybe hundreds of young boys would be unmolested by Liberal paedophile Cyril Smith, convicted criminal Chris Huhne would never have become and MP and hundreds of underage girls in Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford would not have been subjected to sexual abuse and rape by immigrant gangs.

Just minor scrutiny would have revealed the criminal element that infests the Houses of Parliament and Tony Blair would not have taken Great Britain into what many consider to be an illegal war, Gordon Brown would not have been able to spend the country into bankruptcy or destroy the private sector pension funds.

Proper scrutiny would have revealed the numerous sex scandals in Parliament since Profumo fifty years ago.

In conclusion it must be said that the Daily Mail and the rest of the bought and paid for media are not only smearing UKIP and Nigel Farage but also his supporters together with millions of honest, decent people the length and breadth of the country who's only 'crime' in their eyes is to challenge the agenda of the political elite. Hopefully these much abused people will let their feelings be known at the ballot box on Thursday.

Update: Its looks David Blunkett was right. Violent confrontations in Sheffield this week between Yemeni and Pakistani immigrants. It's worth reminding people that Blunkett was part of the government that opened the borders to mass immigration and smeared anyone who questioned the policy as a racist.

Is this the cultural enrichment Blunkett and his government was referring to? Is this inter-racial violence the tangible benefits of multiculturalism? The people deserve an answer from Blunkett, Clegg and the other two charlatans that refuse to manage immigration.

Our diversity is our strength my a*rse.
               ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For those with a strong constitution here is some further reading on media hypocrisy regarding immigration that would have generated howls of manufactured outrage if highlighted by UKIP or Nigel Farage:

Daily Mail story on the Heston Bridge people.

A mind boggling article by the BBC on Nick Clegg calling on Roma immigrants to show sensitivity to the British way of life.

Daily Mail story reporting a French politicians call for Roma gypsies to return to Romania and Bulgaria because they refuse to integrate.

Daily Mail article by Yasmin Alibai-Brown on welfare colonists from the Caribbean and Asia taking over the constituency of Birmingham, Ladywood. Read this and weep for Great Britain.


   

The People Want The Truth! - Red Ed Can't Handle The Truth!

The argument between Labour Party leader Ed Miliband, better known as Red Ed, and the Daily Mail, over an article about his communist father, raises several important issues that are worth a closer look. The first being the infantile behavior of a man that aspires to be the Prime Minister of a once great nation. The fact that Great Britain is no longer one of the greatest nations on earth is mainly down to politicians such as Red Ed and his malevolent, traitorous father.

Watching Ed Miliband perform in Parliament and on the political stage, his immaturity becomes more apparent the longer he talks. This member of the wealthy political elite is more suited to the leadership of a university student Marxist Society than of a major political party.

His dedication to Marxism mirrors that of his father, it jumps out at the listener with every sentence he utters however hard he tries to disguise it. It must be borne in mind that he only became leader of the Labour Party due to the money and political clout of Great Britain's most powerful union baron and fellow communist, Len McCluskey, of the militant union Unite.

The article in question lays out a few truths about Adolph (Ralph) Miliband, leader of the notorious group of so called 'Marxist intellectuals' that has infested British academia for decades. These 'intellectuals' set about brainwashing some of Great Britain's brightest young minds using their destructive, hateful philosophy with the sole purpose of undermining, and eventually bringing down, the very country that gave them security, and in the case of Miliband and others, sanctuary from the Nazi's.

A glance at the radical company that Ralph kept not only reveals the who's who of communist academia but the depth of the infiltration of these revolutionaries into the education establishment.

Two of the issues raised by this spat is Ed Miliband's veiled suggestion that freedom of the press has some limitations and that 'smearing' his late father may be step too far. This is an indication of the inherent urge of communists to control the press; they have a particular aversion to the people having the ability to read the truth.  As a member of the Blair/Brown government that ran a black propaganda machine at the heart of government, Miliband should be the last person to be complaining about smear.

Secondly there is nothing in the article that isn't true.  Ed Miliband however, would prefer a sanitized version of his father's story which fits in with the communist penchant for re-writing history.

He seems to take particular exception to the author questioning his father's patriotism but anyone reading Ralph's pronunciations would come to exactly the same conclusion. He despised long established British institutions with a passion that only a fanatic could have. He despised everything British from the Monarchy to the military and from the Church to the culture of individual liberty.  It must have been torture for Ralph to be living in a country that he hated so much.

Ed Miliband claims his father proved his patriotism and love of Great Britain by joining the military and fighting in WW II. This assertion is meaningless as thousands of non British joined the military specifically to fight Hitler and the Nazi's rather than for any love of Britain.

Socialist icon George Orwell and thousands of others fought in the Spanish civil war, not because of patriotism or to demonstrate his love of Spain but to fight Franco and Fascists.

Red Ed would rather the people not know about his father's fanatical dedication to communism and his own sense of duty to carry on with the revolution to destroy Great Britain and replace it with the usual centrally controlled nightmare that has impoverished and killed millions around the world.

What kind of fanatic stands with fists clenched at the grave of Karl Marx and swears a private oath to the workers cause? What kind of nutcase allows any stray revolutionary into his home and allows his own children to listen and absorb their poison and their hatred of the West?  Surely this is bordering on child abuse as practiced by Muslims who expose their young children to the brainwashing of radical imams.

Red Ed's protestations only serve to draw further attention to his father's fanaticism and his own mission to carry on his father's communist revolution.

At this point it's worth looking at a couple more quotes from Ralph Miliband contained in one of my early efforts at blogging:

He recalls "being in Highgate cemetery standing in front of Karl Marxs' grave, fists clenched swearing my own private oath that I would be faithful to the workers cause".

" I thought of myself as a revolutionary socialist or communist".

Later, an unrepentant Ralph goes on to say "I don't know how faithful I was to that oath in terms of action. I am sure I could have done more, immeasurably more. But I have not  from that day to this departed from the view that this was the right cause and that I belong to it".

Ralph is buried about twelve yards from his blood soaked hero.

One can only imagine the furore if a 'conservative intellectual' swore a similar oath at the grave of Mussolini. The BBC and the Guardian would have a field day.

In his book 'Socialism For A Sceptical Age', Ralph Miliband gives the world a clue as to the motivation and modus operundi of his son, by stating that "the construction of a socialist state is a generational journey. Moving toward a goal rather than the goal itself".

Ed Miliband confirmed during his recent speech to the Labour Party conference that he is a chip off the old block; he is continuing that generational journey toward the socialist state so beloved by his father. High taxes, redistribution of wealth, central control of peoples lives, confiscation of private property by the state etc. etc.  Red Ed is offering nothing other than an overbearing socialist state, it's all there if one can be bothered to read and understand it.

The truth about Red Ed and his fanatical father is in the public domain and if he doesn't like it, tough luck. Their commitment to the destruction of Great Britain and its replacement with a communist state is now common knowledge.

Armed with this knowledge we live in hope that the public will take notice, act accordingly and boot him out. He will then be free to emigrate to North Korea where the system is more to his liking.