As events in the Ukraine and Crimea unfold it is becoming increasingly obvious that the western leaders are not just being out maneuvered by Russia's Vladimir Putin but they are being shown up for what they actually are, media created PR men with no experience in the real world in which we the people abide.
Just a tertiary glance at the backgrounds, experience and accomplishments of the current western leaders reveals weaknesses that any self respecting tyrant in search of his country's lost glory would be a fool to pass up.
It goes without saying that the fearsome reputation of the KGB is well deserved and therefore anyone who leads this organization is by nature ruthless and single minded - in addition, any KGB leader will be well versed in international affairs and a master of strategy.
Vladimir Putin meets these criteria in abundance and in addition he has acquired a degree of Public Relations and media management skills that matches those on which his western foes are totally reliant.
Here is the public face of Putin that the world sees, flip through and enjoy.
While a young Putin was honing his skills in the KGB, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, was behaving like the upper class twit that he is by attending raves and wrecking restaurants as a member of the exclusive Bullington Club. After his exclusive education he spent a couple of years as a PR man for a failed television company before taking his leave of the real world by entering the closed, incestuous world of party politics.
His supposed successor, George Osborne, who is the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, was also an upper class Bullington Club twit but apparently he did gain some real world experience prior to entering party politics by enjoying cocaine fuelled sessions with dominatrix Natalie Rowe.
Here are the public faces of David Cameron and George Osborne. Please try not to laugh.
Here's George and Natalie.
Barack Obama, the current leader of the free world and Commander in Chief' of the mightiest military machine on the planet, spent his formative years smoking dope and spending his time with Marxist professors before taking up a career in community organizing. President Obama spent his formative years in Indonesia, Hawaii and the Peoples Republic of Chicago.
The last G8 was a classic example of the mentality of Cameron and his PR men, the manufactured charade of a tieless, down to earth summit was so contrived and phony it was an embarrassment for the people of Great Britain.
One would think that the European Union which prides itself on having the political clout of nearly five hundred million people would have Putin quaking in his kerenky and scurrying back to Moscow.
Who wouldn't be worried with the EU's High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President if the European Union Commission beating a path to his door?
Vladimir Putin that's who. If the overtly pompous job title isn't enough to split ones side with laughter then the holder will most definitely cause a severe laceration.
The Right Honourable Baroness Ashton of Upholland is the official cover name for Cathy Ashton, a former hippy, serial supporter of left wing causes and the ultimate career bureaucrat. She has never held a proper job nor has she ever been elected to anything. She is one of the highest paid apparatchiks on earth and wields enormous political power, but sadly, in this new post democratic age, she has been appointed and cannot be removed by the people no matter how destructive and incompetent she may be.
Here's the Baroness on the campaign trail.
One has to remember that Ashton was a Vice Chairperson and treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament which agitated for unilateral nuclear disarmament at the height of the Cold War. It is now coming to light that she accepted funding for her traitorous organization from the Soviet Union and they adopted the campaign slogan, "Better Red Than Dead".
More on the Baroness here.
Faced with this cast of characters and their priorities, is it any wonder that Vladimir Putin, who is desperate to return Russia to its former glory and influence, is behaving the way he is?
While Putin is running rampant around the globe and running rings around the western leaders, what exactly are their priorities?
State mandated equality and fairness is high on the agenda of both countries together with a plethora of trendy, bleeding heart, hand wringing, guilt ridden 'progressive' nonsense, designed to make the political class feel good about themselves and help them display their compassionate credentials on the world stage.
Other priorities include:
Minimum wage, soon to become Living wage.
Ensnaring more people into welfare dependency and entitlement addiction.
Imposing multi-culturalism via mass immigration and amnesty.
Downgrading the military and erasing their traditions and history. In the case of the USA, this includes feminizing as much as possible to ensure gender neutrality and gay friendliness.
Putting homosexuals on a pedestal, firstly with equal rights then with special rights and now with extra rights. This must be the most pampered minority group on earth bearing in mind their small numbers.
Wrecking traditional marriage and family life
Eradicating the western Judeo-Christian values and its moral compass and giving medieval death cults such as Islam, moral equivalence.
Impoverishing their respective peoples with spending, taxing, borrowing and debt for generations to come.
The list goes on and the longer it does the more Putin, and all the other enemies of the west, are emboldened. Unless something drastic happens and the people wake up to the danger, the west is doomed.
President Putin on western decline, read this and weep.
We the people are to blame - we've known for many years that the political class are out of control and treating us with contempt.
In Great Britain we know that the leaders of the three main parties share an identical agenda on the main issues. They are as one. We know that David Cameron, Nick Clegg and David Miliband hail from a remote elite with no affiliation with the people they are supposed to represent.
The same goes for President Obama. Everyone knows he is a media created impostor and even when his first term turned out to be a disaster they fell for his spin a second time. The danger now is that like Great Britain, being lied to will be become a normal part of political discourse allowing politicians to get away with destructive policies and outright corruption.
As well as we the people, President Putin knows they are all media creations who are trained in the arts of media management, spin, deceit and lying and unlike Putin, we fall for their propaganda every time. The people are easily seduced with promises the politicians know they will not keep and we will lose our liberties and freedoms to become no better off than the unfortunates of Putin's prison states.
American blogger 90 Miles From Tyranny has put together a gallery of comparisons, well worth a look.
Netanyahu, Putin and Obama at age twenty three.
Vladimir Putin Vs Barack Obama - This is awesome.
Finally just for fun, guess the mystery world leader who would surely have sent Putin back to the Kremlin: Here and here.
Showing posts with label George Osborne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Osborne. Show all posts
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Ukraine Crisis - Politicians Form A Queue To Dump Taxpayers Money
Conflicts around the world be they minor skirmishes of a local nature or larger in scale with loss of life or displacement of civilians, usually follow a familiar pattern. The current conflict in the Ukraine is no different and it is a classic example for students of current affairs and political behavior to study for their thesis or dissertations.
First there's the televised faux outrage by Heads of State or their mouthpieces, followed by some sabre rattling and threats of economic sanctions.
This period is usually followed by some ineffectual posturing at the United Nations and in the unlikely event that all parties can agree, maybe a resolution is issued condemning the bogyman of the day.
(This is dependent upon the UN bureaucrats taking time out from their full time occupation of passing resolutions condemning the USA or Israel)
Then as sure as night follows day comes the call for taxpayers money. Not just a little bit for emergency aid such as tents, blankets, bottled water or medical supplies, but shed loads of it, supposedly to help with reconstruction.
In the case of the Ukraine reconstruction of what is not immediately clear as the Ukrainian infrastructure is as modern as in most other countries in Europe, including and Russia, and the country has an acknowledged modern industrial base.
At the head of the queue with a taxpayer funded give away was the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne who, without consulting the people, generously offered Ukraine a blank cheque.
That was indeed very generous of him considering that infrastructure in Great Britain is badly in need of attention itself. As a result of a deliberate and unprecedented increase in the population, there is now a desperate shortage of houses, hospitals and schools.
Infrastructure such as sewers, water, electricity and gas supply lines, are in need of replacing along with roads, railways and airports that are in need of upgrading and expansion.
If the official statistics are to be believed, poverty in Great Britain has reached Dickensian levels of desperation with the use of food banks and homelessness at an all time high. Increasing numbers of people are finding themselves in fuel poverty with an extra thirty thousand deaths expected this winter due to hypothermia.
These 'excess deaths' as they are officially known are obviously considered a price worth paying in order to 'combat climate change' and the whole scam is a wonderful opportunity for politicians to posture on the world stage demonstrating their 'green' credentials. But I digress.
Next up was American Secretary of State, John Kerry, offering an extra billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned money without consulting the peoples Congress first.
During the last two Presidential campaigns, in addition to a trillion dollar stimulus package, the call for increased infrastructure spending was relentless. Roads and bridges are falling apart and a totally new distribution system is needed to replace the conventional energy delivery with that of green energy.
John Kerry has been traversing the planet preaching that 'climate change' is the biggest threat to world peace in the history of civilization. Therefore, with that in mind, the American taxpayers will be the main contributor to a one hundred billion dollar fund to help developing countries pay for the damage due to 'climate change' which, apparently, was selfishly caused by the west, and also to help them 'combat climate change' in the future. (Just to clarify, the one hundred billion dollars is an annual sum not just a one off payment)
American taxpayers also generously finance a fifty two billion dollar foreign aid budget which includes six hundred and fifteen million per year to oil rich Nigeria, six hundred and eighty eight million annually to Mexico and an eye watering four billion per year to the notoriously corrupt Mohammed Karsai government in Afghanistan.
Judging by the rate at which politicians spend taxpayers money in America, the country has got to be rolling in the stuff, they must be lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bills in Washington DC.
Hot on the heels of John Kerry was the European Union bureaucrats, led by the unelected political crony, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, with promises to Ukraine of a windfall of taxpayers money from her endless supply of it in Brussels.
Baroness Ashton labours under the grandiose title of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security and Vice President of the European Commission - this entitles her to a massive taxpayer funded remuneration package plus expenses and a gold plated pension on retirement. In addition, she is a member of the House of Lords for life which entitles her to another package of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses. (Three hundred quid per day just for turning up. That's around four hundred and eighty US Dollars)
Like their American cousins, there is apparently no shortage of British taxpayers money for these politicians and bureaucrats to spray around everywhere except to alleviate hardship in their home countries. These people have no respect for taxpayers money therefore they have no respect for the taxpayers themselves.
Also in the queue to dump money into the Ukraine are the IMF and the World Bank.
Having established that politicians and global institutions alike are lining up to hose money into the Ukraine, it's worth noting that like Great Britain, Greece and the rest of the European Union, the United States of America is broke, it has no money and it is fast running out of credit.
In order to look generous, and get the credit from the international aid industry, the politicians and bureaucrats are willfully ignoring the fact that the money being sprayed around belongs to the taxpayer - it is the fruit of their labour that has been confiscated under threat of imprisonment.
These self serving egotists are spending wages that are yet to be earned by people yet to be born. They are unconscionable, unscrupulous and utterly without principle.
The countries with the biggest national debts in the world include the USA, Great Britain, France and Germany. These same countries have also been running the biggest budget deficits. Taxpayers from these countries are the biggest contributors to the international institutions that want to dump money into the Ukraine.
To put this into some kind of perspective - British government spending is running at a deficit of over one hundred and ten billion pounds per year and they have accumulated a national debt in excess of one trillion pounds. British taxpayers are already helping to finance the UN, the IMF and the World Bank.
They are also contributing close to forty billion pounds per year to the EU and will be handing out some fourteen billion per year on overseas aid to prosperous nations and dictators. Great Britain has a crumbling infrastructure, a shortage of houses, schools and hospitals; increasing numbers of people cannot pay their heating bills and rely on food banks to survive. The question that begs to be asked is:
Where is Chancellor Osborne getting the money from to give the Ukrainians a blank cheque?
With a seventeen trillion dollar debt and out of control government spending, the situation that American taxpayers find themselves in is no different, therefore the question equally applies to John Kerry:
Where is the extra one billion dollars coming from?
It should be borne in mind that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait UAE, Brazil, Norway, South Korean and Switzerland have little or no national debt and run small deficits or surpluses - one would think that these countries would be head of the queue to aid the Ukraine.
It's noticeable that the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emirs of the wealthy Arab states are missing from the airwaves joining the leaders of the other aforementioned affluent countries in anonymity and leaving the taxpayers of the bankrupt countries to help the Ukrainian people.
In conclusion it is worth pointing out that apart from an infrastructure compatible with any other industrialised country, the Ukraine is rich in natural resources such as iron ore, manganese, nickel and uranium with more than half the country consisting of arable agricultural land. The government of the Ukraine also has a reputation for reneging on its loans and debt repayments.
By any measure Ukraine is not a good risk for taxpayers money but that won't stop the politicians when there is an opportunity to preen themselves on the world stage polishing their egos and their compassionate credentials.
Finally a little light relief from Abba:
I work all night, I work all day to pay the bills I have to pay
Ain't it sad
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me
That's too bad
Money Money Money, must be funny, in the rich mans world
Money Money Money, always sunny, in the rich mans world
Aha Ahaa
All the things that I could do
If I had a little money, in the rich mans world.
Listen to it here and you'll be singing it to yourself all day.
First there's the televised faux outrage by Heads of State or their mouthpieces, followed by some sabre rattling and threats of economic sanctions.
This period is usually followed by some ineffectual posturing at the United Nations and in the unlikely event that all parties can agree, maybe a resolution is issued condemning the bogyman of the day.
(This is dependent upon the UN bureaucrats taking time out from their full time occupation of passing resolutions condemning the USA or Israel)
Then as sure as night follows day comes the call for taxpayers money. Not just a little bit for emergency aid such as tents, blankets, bottled water or medical supplies, but shed loads of it, supposedly to help with reconstruction.
In the case of the Ukraine reconstruction of what is not immediately clear as the Ukrainian infrastructure is as modern as in most other countries in Europe, including and Russia, and the country has an acknowledged modern industrial base.
At the head of the queue with a taxpayer funded give away was the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne who, without consulting the people, generously offered Ukraine a blank cheque.
That was indeed very generous of him considering that infrastructure in Great Britain is badly in need of attention itself. As a result of a deliberate and unprecedented increase in the population, there is now a desperate shortage of houses, hospitals and schools.
Infrastructure such as sewers, water, electricity and gas supply lines, are in need of replacing along with roads, railways and airports that are in need of upgrading and expansion.
If the official statistics are to be believed, poverty in Great Britain has reached Dickensian levels of desperation with the use of food banks and homelessness at an all time high. Increasing numbers of people are finding themselves in fuel poverty with an extra thirty thousand deaths expected this winter due to hypothermia.
These 'excess deaths' as they are officially known are obviously considered a price worth paying in order to 'combat climate change' and the whole scam is a wonderful opportunity for politicians to posture on the world stage demonstrating their 'green' credentials. But I digress.
Next up was American Secretary of State, John Kerry, offering an extra billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned money without consulting the peoples Congress first.
During the last two Presidential campaigns, in addition to a trillion dollar stimulus package, the call for increased infrastructure spending was relentless. Roads and bridges are falling apart and a totally new distribution system is needed to replace the conventional energy delivery with that of green energy.
John Kerry has been traversing the planet preaching that 'climate change' is the biggest threat to world peace in the history of civilization. Therefore, with that in mind, the American taxpayers will be the main contributor to a one hundred billion dollar fund to help developing countries pay for the damage due to 'climate change' which, apparently, was selfishly caused by the west, and also to help them 'combat climate change' in the future. (Just to clarify, the one hundred billion dollars is an annual sum not just a one off payment)
American taxpayers also generously finance a fifty two billion dollar foreign aid budget which includes six hundred and fifteen million per year to oil rich Nigeria, six hundred and eighty eight million annually to Mexico and an eye watering four billion per year to the notoriously corrupt Mohammed Karsai government in Afghanistan.
Judging by the rate at which politicians spend taxpayers money in America, the country has got to be rolling in the stuff, they must be lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bills in Washington DC.
Hot on the heels of John Kerry was the European Union bureaucrats, led by the unelected political crony, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, with promises to Ukraine of a windfall of taxpayers money from her endless supply of it in Brussels.
Baroness Ashton labours under the grandiose title of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security and Vice President of the European Commission - this entitles her to a massive taxpayer funded remuneration package plus expenses and a gold plated pension on retirement. In addition, she is a member of the House of Lords for life which entitles her to another package of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses. (Three hundred quid per day just for turning up. That's around four hundred and eighty US Dollars)
Like their American cousins, there is apparently no shortage of British taxpayers money for these politicians and bureaucrats to spray around everywhere except to alleviate hardship in their home countries. These people have no respect for taxpayers money therefore they have no respect for the taxpayers themselves.
Also in the queue to dump money into the Ukraine are the IMF and the World Bank.
Having established that politicians and global institutions alike are lining up to hose money into the Ukraine, it's worth noting that like Great Britain, Greece and the rest of the European Union, the United States of America is broke, it has no money and it is fast running out of credit.
In order to look generous, and get the credit from the international aid industry, the politicians and bureaucrats are willfully ignoring the fact that the money being sprayed around belongs to the taxpayer - it is the fruit of their labour that has been confiscated under threat of imprisonment.
These self serving egotists are spending wages that are yet to be earned by people yet to be born. They are unconscionable, unscrupulous and utterly without principle.
The countries with the biggest national debts in the world include the USA, Great Britain, France and Germany. These same countries have also been running the biggest budget deficits. Taxpayers from these countries are the biggest contributors to the international institutions that want to dump money into the Ukraine.
To put this into some kind of perspective - British government spending is running at a deficit of over one hundred and ten billion pounds per year and they have accumulated a national debt in excess of one trillion pounds. British taxpayers are already helping to finance the UN, the IMF and the World Bank.
They are also contributing close to forty billion pounds per year to the EU and will be handing out some fourteen billion per year on overseas aid to prosperous nations and dictators. Great Britain has a crumbling infrastructure, a shortage of houses, schools and hospitals; increasing numbers of people cannot pay their heating bills and rely on food banks to survive. The question that begs to be asked is:
Where is Chancellor Osborne getting the money from to give the Ukrainians a blank cheque?
With a seventeen trillion dollar debt and out of control government spending, the situation that American taxpayers find themselves in is no different, therefore the question equally applies to John Kerry:
Where is the extra one billion dollars coming from?
It should be borne in mind that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait UAE, Brazil, Norway, South Korean and Switzerland have little or no national debt and run small deficits or surpluses - one would think that these countries would be head of the queue to aid the Ukraine.
It's noticeable that the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emirs of the wealthy Arab states are missing from the airwaves joining the leaders of the other aforementioned affluent countries in anonymity and leaving the taxpayers of the bankrupt countries to help the Ukrainian people.
In conclusion it is worth pointing out that apart from an infrastructure compatible with any other industrialised country, the Ukraine is rich in natural resources such as iron ore, manganese, nickel and uranium with more than half the country consisting of arable agricultural land. The government of the Ukraine also has a reputation for reneging on its loans and debt repayments.
By any measure Ukraine is not a good risk for taxpayers money but that won't stop the politicians when there is an opportunity to preen themselves on the world stage polishing their egos and their compassionate credentials.
Finally a little light relief from Abba:
I work all night, I work all day to pay the bills I have to pay
Ain't it sad
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me
That's too bad
Money Money Money, must be funny, in the rich mans world
Money Money Money, always sunny, in the rich mans world
Aha Ahaa
All the things that I could do
If I had a little money, in the rich mans world.
Listen to it here and you'll be singing it to yourself all day.
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
'British Are A Nation Of Surrender Monkeys' - Prime Minister's Mouthpiece Cuts Loose
It would be interesting to see the reaction if the author of this gross insult were to walk into room full of veterans who have faithfully carried out their duty when put into harms way. It would be similarly interesting to see the reaction of those who have lost loved ones who made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of their country.
To be labeled 'a nation of crisp eating surrender monkeys' by someone who has experienced the heat of battle and been on the receiving end of weapons designed to kill or maim is one thing, but to be labeled as such by a more than useless journalist who has made no contribution whatsoever to the life of the nation is a bitter pill to swallow.
The low life in question is serial failure Toby Young, an author and journalist who has achieved nothing in life on his own merits and whos sole purpose on the planet is to act as a mouthpiece for the equally useless Prime Minister David Cameron.
Young was an utter failure at school but mysteriously managed to secure a place at Oxford University where he obtained the infamous Politics Philosophy and Economics degree which is the necessary qualification if one wants to join the cross party 'progressive' elite. At this point it's worth mentioning his impeccable 'progressive' pedigree. He is the son of a BBC Radio producer and a Labour Party life peer, the Baron Young of Dartington. This life long social reformer was one of those responsible for destroying Great Britain's education system which they replaced with the 'progressive' comprehensive system that is still trapping young people in mediocrity to this day.
Toby Young's insult formed part of the collective tantrum thrown by the warmongering wing of David Cameron's Conservative Party after they lost the House of Commons vote on using weapons of mass destruction on unspecified warring factions in Syria. It is beyond Young's capabilities to understand that the British people have no faith in the political class and wouldn't trust them with a schoolboys peashooter let alone a cruise missile.
Young's attack on the British people was pure spite, reflecting the chagrin of his master who desperately wanted a war in order to have something on his otherwise empty Curriculum Vitae and to give him an international reputation which is noteable only for his continual groveling to Germany's Angela Merkel and Herman von Rumpuy of the EU.
His insult does not even contain any accurate facts and is patent nonsense:
"no longer can we pride ourselves on standing up to tyranny".
Great Britain and the West have failed to stand up to tyrants and mass murder for years so why is Assad any different?
In his indecent haste to speak on behalf of his defeated master, Young shows his ignorance of contemporary politics:
"Gone is the special relationship that meant that Britain and America could always count on each other to commit blood and treasure to defending the principles of liberal democracy".
If Toby Young would take his head out of Cameron's backside for long enough to look around, he might have noticed that any special relationship went up in a haze of dope smoke with the election of the unreconstructed British hater Barack Obama. Young is obviously unaware that 'defending the principles of liberal democracy' doesn't appear to apply in countries like North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe etc. (see previous post)
Toby Young builds up to his hysterical finale with a double dose of bovine excrement:
"The message sent out by the mother of parliaments to tyrants across the world was: Do whatever you like. Gas your own citizens. Murder innocent children. Commit genocide. We won't lift a finger to stop you".
This nonsense is breathtaking in it's hypocrisy and double standards. Where was the mother of parliaments when Saddam Hussein was gassing Iranians and his own citizens prior to Gulf War l? Where is the mother of parliaments when Christian men, women and children are being mercilessly butchered in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan and a host of other Muslim countries? Where was the mother of parliaments when Omar al Bashir was committing genocide in Sudan?
The mother of parliaments didn't lift a finger to stop those tyrants so why is Assad so different?
Toby Young insults the whole of the British nation because they refuse to give their media created Prime Minister a free hand to dish out death and destruction onto the Syrian people without making a case and without credible evidence.
He needs to inform the British people as to which of the various factions the Prime Minister should bomb. The latest reports are indicating that it was a Saudi financed, al Qaeda backed rebel group that used these weapons and nobody should be surprised if that were the case. Other reports are suggesting that the British government's own Ministry of Business, Innovation and Skills was party to supplying some of the materials that are required to manufacture these weapons.
British Prime Ministers and American Presidents have always turned a blind eye to tyrants when it has suited them to do so. Saddam Hussein met Toby Young's criteria for tyranny and mass murder but he was feted and supplied by the West while he was at war with Iran: when that conflict was over and he turned his attention to Kuwait his behavior suddenly became unacceptable.
The tyrant Bashir al Assad and American Secretary of State John Kerry, together with their families, enjoyed a friendly relationship until recently; what Toby Young doesn't explain is how Assad has suddenly became persona non grata without doing anything different from what he has done over the years. It must be remembered that Assad was just as bad a tyrant when Kerry was enjoying their friendship as he is now.
Apart from the insult thrown at the British people by a lickspittle like Toby Young, it is interesting to note the nonsense spewing forth from the other apologists for David Cameron's bloated ego.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne is supposed to be looking after the nations finances, which were devastated by the previous socialist government; not agitating for another war which will only mean more hardship for the long suffering British people. He is currently borrowing 120 billion per year and racking up such a massive debt it will take generations to pay off, if ever. How does he propose to pay for an arsenal of cruise missiles and other expensive ordinance when, as the outgoing Treasury Minister said, "there is no money left?"
Osborne shows himself up for the cynical, spin infested political charlatan that he is by waxing lyrical about Great Britain's place in the world. It is worth paying particular attention to what he said after the House of Commons vote:
"I think there will be a national soul searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system, be that by being an open trading nation that I would like us to be or whether we turn our backs on that".
Of all the political double talk, spin and outright lies the people have to listen to from these awful people, this must rank up there with the most shameful.
Osborne must be off his rocker if he wants the people to take him seriously about "being an open trading nation" when he personally, together with his boss Cameron and his de-toxified Consevative party, are busy diminishing the country and destroying it as such by submerging it into the United States of Europe. George Osborne needs to explain to the British people how their country can possibly be an 'open trading nation' while at the same time exchanging its independence to trade globally for the supposed collective clout of the European Union bureaucracy.
If George Osborne seriously thinks he can get away with making comments about Great Britain as an 'open trading nation and turning their backs on the world', then he is not the strategist he claims to be. Great Britain and its Commonwealth partners were the ideal global trading partners until Osborne's predecessors 'turned their backs on the world' and dumped them in favour of the inward looking, disastrous collective in Brussels.
Great Britain is shackled to the same European dead horse that has ruined the economies of the Mediterranean countries together with Ireland and Portugal, but unshackled in the case of waging war where the EU has dumped Great Britain to go it alone.
Two issues need to be mentioned in conclusion:
Firstly: As he is an advocate of waging war, there is nothing preventing Toby Young from becoming a war correspondent and sending dispatches from the Syrian front line. As is traditional with modern day war correspondents he can embed himself with any number of factions, including the rebels who are fighting the tyrannical government he wants overthrown and punished.
Any armchair warmonger can advocate military action from the comfort and safety of a Daily Telegraph office so I would suggest that unless Toby Young is prepared to go there himself and report in person on the consequences of his advocacy, he should keep his insults to himself and his mouth firmly shut.
Secondly: If the British people do not need permission from EU bureaucrats like Herman von Rumpuy and Baroness Ashton to wage a destructive war, then surely they do not need permission to serve olive oil in a dipping bowl at restaurant tables, work more than forty eight hours per week, empty rubbish bins more than once a fortnight, deport foreign terrorists and criminals and to decide who gets welfare and who does not. There's not a bigger impoverishing tyranny on the planet than the European Union so Cameron could do the world a favour by raining his bombs down on Brussels.
To be labeled 'a nation of crisp eating surrender monkeys' by someone who has experienced the heat of battle and been on the receiving end of weapons designed to kill or maim is one thing, but to be labeled as such by a more than useless journalist who has made no contribution whatsoever to the life of the nation is a bitter pill to swallow.
The low life in question is serial failure Toby Young, an author and journalist who has achieved nothing in life on his own merits and whos sole purpose on the planet is to act as a mouthpiece for the equally useless Prime Minister David Cameron.
Young was an utter failure at school but mysteriously managed to secure a place at Oxford University where he obtained the infamous Politics Philosophy and Economics degree which is the necessary qualification if one wants to join the cross party 'progressive' elite. At this point it's worth mentioning his impeccable 'progressive' pedigree. He is the son of a BBC Radio producer and a Labour Party life peer, the Baron Young of Dartington. This life long social reformer was one of those responsible for destroying Great Britain's education system which they replaced with the 'progressive' comprehensive system that is still trapping young people in mediocrity to this day.
Toby Young's insult formed part of the collective tantrum thrown by the warmongering wing of David Cameron's Conservative Party after they lost the House of Commons vote on using weapons of mass destruction on unspecified warring factions in Syria. It is beyond Young's capabilities to understand that the British people have no faith in the political class and wouldn't trust them with a schoolboys peashooter let alone a cruise missile.
Young's attack on the British people was pure spite, reflecting the chagrin of his master who desperately wanted a war in order to have something on his otherwise empty Curriculum Vitae and to give him an international reputation which is noteable only for his continual groveling to Germany's Angela Merkel and Herman von Rumpuy of the EU.
His insult does not even contain any accurate facts and is patent nonsense:
"no longer can we pride ourselves on standing up to tyranny".
Great Britain and the West have failed to stand up to tyrants and mass murder for years so why is Assad any different?
In his indecent haste to speak on behalf of his defeated master, Young shows his ignorance of contemporary politics:
"Gone is the special relationship that meant that Britain and America could always count on each other to commit blood and treasure to defending the principles of liberal democracy".
If Toby Young would take his head out of Cameron's backside for long enough to look around, he might have noticed that any special relationship went up in a haze of dope smoke with the election of the unreconstructed British hater Barack Obama. Young is obviously unaware that 'defending the principles of liberal democracy' doesn't appear to apply in countries like North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe etc. (see previous post)
Toby Young builds up to his hysterical finale with a double dose of bovine excrement:
"The message sent out by the mother of parliaments to tyrants across the world was: Do whatever you like. Gas your own citizens. Murder innocent children. Commit genocide. We won't lift a finger to stop you".
This nonsense is breathtaking in it's hypocrisy and double standards. Where was the mother of parliaments when Saddam Hussein was gassing Iranians and his own citizens prior to Gulf War l? Where is the mother of parliaments when Christian men, women and children are being mercilessly butchered in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan and a host of other Muslim countries? Where was the mother of parliaments when Omar al Bashir was committing genocide in Sudan?
The mother of parliaments didn't lift a finger to stop those tyrants so why is Assad so different?
Toby Young insults the whole of the British nation because they refuse to give their media created Prime Minister a free hand to dish out death and destruction onto the Syrian people without making a case and without credible evidence.
He needs to inform the British people as to which of the various factions the Prime Minister should bomb. The latest reports are indicating that it was a Saudi financed, al Qaeda backed rebel group that used these weapons and nobody should be surprised if that were the case. Other reports are suggesting that the British government's own Ministry of Business, Innovation and Skills was party to supplying some of the materials that are required to manufacture these weapons.
British Prime Ministers and American Presidents have always turned a blind eye to tyrants when it has suited them to do so. Saddam Hussein met Toby Young's criteria for tyranny and mass murder but he was feted and supplied by the West while he was at war with Iran: when that conflict was over and he turned his attention to Kuwait his behavior suddenly became unacceptable.
The tyrant Bashir al Assad and American Secretary of State John Kerry, together with their families, enjoyed a friendly relationship until recently; what Toby Young doesn't explain is how Assad has suddenly became persona non grata without doing anything different from what he has done over the years. It must be remembered that Assad was just as bad a tyrant when Kerry was enjoying their friendship as he is now.
Apart from the insult thrown at the British people by a lickspittle like Toby Young, it is interesting to note the nonsense spewing forth from the other apologists for David Cameron's bloated ego.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne is supposed to be looking after the nations finances, which were devastated by the previous socialist government; not agitating for another war which will only mean more hardship for the long suffering British people. He is currently borrowing 120 billion per year and racking up such a massive debt it will take generations to pay off, if ever. How does he propose to pay for an arsenal of cruise missiles and other expensive ordinance when, as the outgoing Treasury Minister said, "there is no money left?"
Osborne shows himself up for the cynical, spin infested political charlatan that he is by waxing lyrical about Great Britain's place in the world. It is worth paying particular attention to what he said after the House of Commons vote:
"I think there will be a national soul searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system, be that by being an open trading nation that I would like us to be or whether we turn our backs on that".
Of all the political double talk, spin and outright lies the people have to listen to from these awful people, this must rank up there with the most shameful.
Osborne must be off his rocker if he wants the people to take him seriously about "being an open trading nation" when he personally, together with his boss Cameron and his de-toxified Consevative party, are busy diminishing the country and destroying it as such by submerging it into the United States of Europe. George Osborne needs to explain to the British people how their country can possibly be an 'open trading nation' while at the same time exchanging its independence to trade globally for the supposed collective clout of the European Union bureaucracy.
If George Osborne seriously thinks he can get away with making comments about Great Britain as an 'open trading nation and turning their backs on the world', then he is not the strategist he claims to be. Great Britain and its Commonwealth partners were the ideal global trading partners until Osborne's predecessors 'turned their backs on the world' and dumped them in favour of the inward looking, disastrous collective in Brussels.
Great Britain is shackled to the same European dead horse that has ruined the economies of the Mediterranean countries together with Ireland and Portugal, but unshackled in the case of waging war where the EU has dumped Great Britain to go it alone.
Two issues need to be mentioned in conclusion:
Firstly: As he is an advocate of waging war, there is nothing preventing Toby Young from becoming a war correspondent and sending dispatches from the Syrian front line. As is traditional with modern day war correspondents he can embed himself with any number of factions, including the rebels who are fighting the tyrannical government he wants overthrown and punished.
Any armchair warmonger can advocate military action from the comfort and safety of a Daily Telegraph office so I would suggest that unless Toby Young is prepared to go there himself and report in person on the consequences of his advocacy, he should keep his insults to himself and his mouth firmly shut.
Secondly: If the British people do not need permission from EU bureaucrats like Herman von Rumpuy and Baroness Ashton to wage a destructive war, then surely they do not need permission to serve olive oil in a dipping bowl at restaurant tables, work more than forty eight hours per week, empty rubbish bins more than once a fortnight, deport foreign terrorists and criminals and to decide who gets welfare and who does not. There's not a bigger impoverishing tyranny on the planet than the European Union so Cameron could do the world a favour by raining his bombs down on Brussels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)