An EU From The Urals To The Atlantic - Fulfilling Hitler's Dream

The bloody conflict currently enveloping Ukraine is being portrayed as a civil war between factions loyal to Vladimir Putin's Russian and those who want to break away and form closer ties with the European Union. In reality its a proxy war being fought between the leaders of an expansionist EU who dream of an empire stretching from the "Urals to the Atlantic" and Vladimir Putin who is attempting to preserve whats left of the Russian empire.

A European empire stretching from the Ural Mountains in the east to the Atlantic Ocean in the west did not become EU policy overnight dreamt up with foresight by some benign bureaucrats in a smoke filled backroom over brandy and cigars.

Military campaigns to subjugate the nations of Europe and form an empire have been fought by a variety of armies throughout history including those of the Romans and the Moors but none have codified their ambitions in more detail than Hitler and the National Socialists.

It's worth noting at this point that the Ural mountains are considered historically - and geographically - to be the border where Europe ends and Asia begins.

Hitler's plan for a Grossgermanisches Reich or a Greater Germanic Reich is well documented whereby he envisaged a Jew free, German controlled Europe stretching from the "Urals to the Atlantic".

If that quote sounds familiar its because it was uttered by British Prime Minister David Cameron during a visit to the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan albeit from front to back. He told students at the Nazabeyev University in the capital Astana that:

"Our vision of the EU is that it should be a large trading and co-operating organisation that effectively stretches, as it were, from the Atlantic to the Urals".

When Cameron told the students of Kazakhstan that the EU is "a large trading and co-operating organisation" he was doing what he does to the British people as a matter of course - willfully lying through his teeth with malice aforethought about the nature of the EU.

The British people were conned by the very same lies some forty- five years ago when the then Prime Minister Edward Heath sold the Common Market as a benign 'trading and co-operating organisation' knowing full well that it was the fist step on the road to a post democratic federal superstate.

Cameron didn't tell the Kazakh students that they would be required to surrender their sovereignty and consequently their newly won freedom; and in doing so they would be exchanging authoritarian rule from Moscow to that of Brussels.

He also failed to inform them that if they, like the Greeks, the Irish and the Italians, are dumb enough to join the Euro currency they risk debt, bankruptcy and imposed austerity on terms dictated by German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Identical to Hitler's foreign policy, Cameron and the EU politburo believe the Urals to be the westernmost border of their European empire and all countries to the west should be absorbed into a Greater European superstate. This is nonsense of course designed to stir up antagonism with the Russian leadership as it contains a huge chunk of western Russia including Moscow.

Like the current EU, Hitler envisioned a Europe where independent nation states cease to exist replaced by vassal regions in thrall to Berlin.

The current EU government appears to be in Brussels but it is widely acknowledged that as far as EU policy is concerned what Angela Merkel says goes with no dissenters allowed. None of the current national leaders, Cameron included, are prepared to confront her even if the interests of their people are in jeopardy.

It doesn't stop with Ukraine and Kazakhstan, the EU and its agents, including former President Herman von Rumpuy and foreign affairs chief Baroness Ashton, are meddling and interfering in other former Soviet republics such as Georgia, Moldovia and Azerbaijan much to the consternation of Vladimir Putin. They have even solicited the expensive services of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair while Prince Andrew is reported to be socialising on a regular basis with Azerbaijani tyrant IIham Aliyev.

Looking at the current expansion plans of the EU, combined with the return of rabid anti-semitism across Europe, Hitler's dream of a Jew free empire from the Atlantic to the Urals is closer now than it was during the height of his power. It may not have reached the Ural mountains yet but unless they are stopped the ambition and the perverted will of the EU is there to make the old dictators dream come true.
 

Cameron v Putin - The British Are Fighting The Wrong Enemy

When British Prime Minister David Cameron announced his intention to interfere in the Ukrainian civil war further antagonising Russian President Vladimir Putin, his priorities and motives are quite rightly called into question.

From now until the general election due in May, every word, action and deed by Cameron will be carefully constructed by his controllers, in tandem with their professional team of PR men, media managers, advertising executives and image consultants, to glean every possible political advantage for their man and their agenda.

Due to a litany of false promises and outright lies over the issues that concern them the most, the British public are finally waking up to the fact that their Prime Minister is nothing more than a media creation who's only skill is delivering PR choreographed public performances in pursuit of a long planned transformational agenda.

Putting some seventy three military personnel into harms way in a vicious civil war involving the Russian hard man, Putin, is not going to affect the outcome one iota, the image this nonsense is intended to create however is highly significant........if the British electorate are fool enough to fall for it that is.

One would think that with ISIS and its affiliates butchering their way across the middle east and Africa manned by thousands of British documented jihadis and with those same battle hardened killers promising to bring their murderous mission to the British mainland, Cameron should have a different set of priorities.

It must be noted that although Putin and his regime are no angels, at time of writing no Russian has bombed a bus or underground train on the London Transport System killing and maiming hundreds of innocent people; no Russian has beheaded a soldier in broad daylight on a London street.

There are no Russian paedophile gangs grooming under age British girls by the tens of thousands then subjecting them to rape and horrific sexual abuse. Russians are not mutilating the genitals of hundreds of young girls every year.

Russian fanatics are not setting up semi-autonomous no-go areas and demanding that the indigenous British people submit to their demands and no Russian gangs are wanting to see their national flag flying high over Buckingham Palace and the Prime Ministers residence at 10 Downing Street.

There are no Russian hate preachers demanding that the British people submit to Russian law.

On the contrary, Cameron welcomes Russian billionaires who appear to be buying up London real estate and businesses including football clubs and newspapers.

The intervention in the Ukrainian civil war is a carefully crafted pre-election publicity stunt designed to deflect attention away from his government's disastrous appeasement of the EU and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in particular. It is also designed to halt the inexorable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) who oppose the EU agenda.

(There is also a long term project of EU expansion into the former Soviet states, including Ukraine, but this is not Cameron's primary motive for his current behavior.)

Just to recap briefly: Cameron hails from a wealthy elite who attended Eton college, Great Britain's most exclusive private school and one of its most expensive.

After Eton he spent a gap year indulging in party politics before going up to Oxford University where he was apparently spotted as future leadership material. By who is not immediately clear but from then on his political career was managed down to the minutest detail.

After graduation, armed with the now requisite degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics, he took the well trodden path into the incestuous world of party politics as a special advisor to some senior leaders of the day.

Consequently he has no experience whatsoever in the real world outside of party politics; he has no experience or empathy with real people or any clue about their hopes or aspirations. He has no experience in the business world or the world of wealth creation. More importantly to this issue, he has little experience outside the British shores and consequently in foreign affairs.

The ever popular, and accurate, impression of David Cameron as weak, craven and in thrall to German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is entirely correct, therefore his controllers needed some high profile action to counter this before it sticks irrevocably.

Bearing in mind that the EU, led by Merkel, were still negotiating a possible deal with Putin over the Ukrainian civil war, the unilateral action announced by Cameron was calculated to achieve three things:

i) to give the impression that he is his own man not beholden to the EU leaders, especially Frau Merkel.

ii) to give the impression that he is unafraid to take tough decisions in order to stand up to the worlds current bogey man, Vladimir Putin.

iii) that he is has the stature required to fill the vacuum left by President Obama as leader of the free world.

The facts speak for themselves, David Cameron is indeed in thrall to Frau Merkel and the other EU leaders and he remains totally committed to the European project. This requires that Great Britain transfer what is left of its sovereignty to Brussels, becoming fully integrated into the post democratic federal superstate currently referred to as the European Union (EU)

On orders of Merkel and the other EU leaders, and despite claiming otherwise, Cameron is absolutely committed to open border mass immigration in order to fundamentally transform Great Britain into a so called 'multi-cultural society' thus ending thousands of years of British history and its unique way of life.

Examples of his subservience abound but his smack down by Merkel over border control remains a classic. Who would have thought that a German Chancellor would tell a British Prime Minister that he will not be allowed to control his own borders as demanded by his own people? Weak and craven doesn't begin to describe David Cameron.

In conclusion it must be noted that with Cameron's election war chest bursting at the seams with EU and hedge fund money, and with the bought-and paid-for MSM, including the BBC, in his pocket, the British electorate can expect many more stunts like this together with an unprecedented campaign of vilification against his opponents including UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage.

British ISIS Terrorists - David Cameron Not So Tough After All

It didn't take long for David Cameron's tough action plan to combat Great Britain's home grown ISIS jihadis to be unmasked for the worthless PR exercise that it was. The anti-Obama media outlets in the USA, including Fox News, would have done better to talk to the long suffering British people before they started touting Cameron as the proactive, tough talking pragmatist that they wanted their President to emulate.

The British people have heard it all before as his latest shameless attempt to convince the electorate, and the wider world at large, that he is a fearless, no nonsense statesman who will not hesitate to take the tough decisions necessary to combat the ruthless ISIS terrorists that are the creation of his own policies.

The world's media outlets and their political pundits understood from Cameron's spin doctor produced speeches that he was going to remove the passports from the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of British Muslims who have joined the jihad in places such as Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Chechnya and elsewhere.

They also understood that he was going to fulfill his long held ambition to have his own war by bombing Syria and arming the rebels - however he failed to make it clear which rebel faction he was going to arm. And what better way is there to create a new Johnny Rambo type action man image than confronting the macho man himself, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Cameron has threatened to put three and half thousand troops on the Ukrainian border to discourage Putin's army from supporting the Ukrainian separatists. Putin must be quaking in his kerenky.

It doesn't take long for the discerning observer to take apart this latest choreographed Cameron performance especially if his pedigree and modus operandi are taken into account.

David Cameron adheres to the new system of politics that was pioneered by his mentor, Tony Blair. His PR machine uses focus groups and pollsters to work out the issues that are of most concern to the different demographic groups, they then manufacture his speeches and choreograph his public performances to appeal to the majority in each group, while at the same time keeping his real agenda under wraps.

Knowing full well that the majority of the British people despise the EU, he stated that he would be the most Eurosceptic Prime Minister in history. After attaining office he stated that he "firmly believes Britain's place is inside European Union". He was then, and remains, a committed supporter of 'ever closer union' and the eventual integration of Great Britain into the United States of Europe.

 His 'cast iron guarantee' that the British people will get a referendum on EU membership will go down as one of the biggest whoppers in political history.

Cameron continues to promise a re-negotiation of membership terms despite the fact that his bosses in Brussels, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have said no re-negotiation is possible. He is promising a referendum on membership but not before 2017 and only if he is re-elected as Prime Minister.

As a flavor of Cameron's propensity for making false promises for electoral gain, in 2007, prior to his election, he promised a series of measures to deal with violent crime. This included tearing up the twenty four hour drinking laws, minimum sentencing, using prison ships, building more prisons, supporting marriage through the tax and benefits system. etc. His government promised to cut taxes, including inheritance tax, deal with the deficit and cut the debt. It's now 2014 and none of these promises have been delivered.
(See some of Cameron's fibs here)

The biggest issues by far for the British people are open border mass immigration together with imposed multi-culturalism and Islamification. It is in this arena that David Cameron comes into his own as a consummate PR man and congenital liar. It is these dubious skills that caused the world's media to mistakenly portray him as a tough, uncompromising, decision taking statesman when confronted by British born ISIS fanatics and radical Islam.

Cameron's knowingly false promise to cut net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands put paid once and for all the myth that he has even an iota of credibility. Immigration has gone inexorably up year on year despite the fact that it is within his power to fulfill this promise.

With his reputation as a mere PR man firmly established, his latest tough guy performance can now be looked at in a truer light and his pronouncements dissected to reveal their real purpose, which is image making and spinning for electoral purposes.

Cameron loudly intimated he will remove passports from British ISIS jihadis and strip them of their citizenship only to back off a week later after he thought his tough guy reputation was secured.
(Cameron seizing passports here, Cameron not seizing passports here.

At the recent NATO summit, statesman Cameron noisily stated that he doesn't need President Bashir al Assad's permission to bomb Syria as he doesn't recognize him as the countries legitimate leader. He also claimed that Assad is part of the problem. One week later his Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond has ruled out any bombing of Syria.
(Cameron bombing Syria here, Cameron not bombing Syria here)

He carries on making knowingly false promises in the forlorn hope that the British people will take him seriously when their experience of his past pronunciations  and the consequences of his lying are there for all to see:

He promised to clamp down on Muslim preachers of hate - false

He promised to teach British values in schools - false

He promised to prevent access by immigrants to the people's taxpayer funded welfare system - false

He promised to end health tourism by denying access by immigrants to the peoples NHS - false

He promised to stop further integration to the European Union - false

And so it goes on and on, he seems to be incapable of being straight with the British people even when they know what his real agenda is.

David Cameron is a self admitted Europhile who is totally dedicated to the integration of Great Britain into a post democratic United States of Europe. He is therefore committed to replacing the traditional way of life with a 'multi-cultural society' and using rigidly policed political correctness to achieve this goal.

He is completely out of step with the majority of the British people and this is demonstrated by the flight of his traditional supporters to the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and with this comes the prospect of political oblivion for him and his treacherous fellow travelers.

Building An EU Empire From The Atlantic To The Urals Without A Mandate

One has to give credit to the European Union and its leaders for the way they can deceive their respective peoples with what is a continuous tissue of lies, obfuscation and deceit and get away with it unscathed. Having a government-media complex in their back pocket is a big help off course, along with compliant populations who are beaten down with a deluge of propaganda unheard of since the days of the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.

Their belief in propaganda combined with their utter contempt for the views of their people has led these elitists to believe they can re-order the world without consulting those who's lives will be drastically altered.

The Divine Right of Kings may have gone the way of King Charles the First's head, but it has reappeared with a vengeance in the new post democratic age and it is used ruthlessly by this new generic political class. These politicians have been conditioned to believe that their global agenda is somehow 'divinely' inspired and must be imposed at all costs regardless of any objections from the people who will suffer the consequences.

As we know from the Jean Monet strategy, the EU was conceived and expanded by a series lies deliberately employed to fool the people into a federal superstate without them realising their fate. This has been the strategy employed ever since by politicians of all parties who are dedicated to the superstate project.

Despite his claims to be otherwise, British Prime Minister David Cameron is the consummate European politician who has mastered the art of saying one thing to the British people and something totally different to the European audience he is trying to woo.

At home he is trying to stem the tide of Euroscepticism by claiming the EU must be reformed as a condition for British membership or the EU must drop its insistence on 'ever closer union'.  He is going to re-negotiate Britain's term of membership and take back control of the borders etc. etc. In Europe he is letting slip the true ambitions of the EU which is to have an empire from the Atlantic to the Urals while speaking in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan.

Cameron states that "Britain has always supported the widening of the EU" - no it hasn't, the people have not been consulted so he cannot speak for Great Britain. What he means is that the political elite want to expand the EU empire to snare as many other peoples as possible into their clutches in an effort to accumulate power.

In his arrogance he also states that "Our vision of the EU is that it should be a large trading and cooperating organisation that effectively stretches, as it were, from the Atlantic to the Urals". When he says "our vision" who is he referring to?  The result of the last European elections clearly demonstrate that it's not the British people. Again he is speaking on behalf of the political elite not the British people.

Even in his speech to the Kazakh audience he refuses to tell the whole truth; he makes reference to a "large trading and cooperating organisation" but fails to mention the surrender of sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats that will end any democratic aspirations the Kazakh people may have had after their liberation from the Soviet empire.

(Read the story here)

He tells the British people that the current EU is out date and unacceptable in its present form only to tell his East European audience that "we have a wide vision of Europe and have always encouraged countries that want to join".   There's that "we" again.

In an attempt to fool the people Cameron has reshuffled his Cabinet to include a supposed Eurosceptic Phillip Hammond as Foreign Secretary.  Apart from saying that he would vote to leave the EU if it doesn't change he has done little to convince anyone he wants a free, independent and sovereign Great Britain.
(Hammond story here)

At the same time as Hammond is unconvincingly talking about a possible British exit, the top conservative in the House of Lords is proclaiming that a British exit "is not an option".

Lord Popat, the Conservative Chief Whip and spokesman for the Department of Business Innovation and Skills, stated that  "there is no chance that the UK could leave the EU".

Maybe Cameron could enlighten the British people as to which one of his senior lieutenants should be believed. Bearing in mind that Lord Popat is appointed, not elected, he is more in line with the EU modus operandi. Hammond voting to leave doesn't mean Britain actually will, the odds must be on the noble Lord.
(Lord Popat story here)

Despite his claim to be listening to the British people and that he "gets it" with reference to their immigration concerns, Cameron continues to lie - he could do the decent thing for once in his disreputable political career and tell the truth:

He is committed to the EU project as it stands today.

There will be no meaningful renegotiation of membership terms. The EU leaders have already said so.

The British government will not repatriate any powers.  On the contrary, sovereignty will continued to be slowly and inexorably surrendered.

The British government will never regain control over the borders and uncontrolled mass immigration will continue.

He is committed to expanding the EU empire to include Turkey, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Serbia and that means giving unlimited access to the British people's taxpayer funded welfare system to another one hundred and thirty nine million impoverished people who may not be compatible to the British way of life.

The EU has been a disaster for the British people and their way of life.  The only vision they have is to be rid of it and be a free, independent and sovereign nation once again.


                                                  ------------------------------------------------


Footnote: Attempts to coerce Ukraine into the EU empire has resulted in a bloody civil war, trying to do the same with other Soviet Republics like Kazakhstan would be disastrous, but thats another story.  

Ukraine, Gaza, Syria - Blessed Are The Peacemakers But Where Are They?

To the casual observer of the news bulletins it would appear that the world is going to hell in something bigger and faster than a handcart. Even the major conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza and Syria are being supplemented by other not so public bloodfests in Iraq, Nigeria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq and so on and so forth. And, as always, it's civilians that pay the biggest price for the follies and intransigence of the perpetrators.

Despite the claim of being civilised, the modern age is no different to ages past and is just as jam packed with war mongers, imperialists, ambitious empire builders and covetous expansionists that caused mayhem and bloodshed throughout history.

One difference between today and those bygone ages is the prevalence of high profile people who masquerade around the world claiming to be peacemakers or lovers of peace. One would think that with the resources of the United Nations and its agencies, together with the combined efforts of all these peacemakers, there would not be any wars at all.

Looking at the facts it becomes immediately apparent that the United Nations is not only a hopeless hotbed of corruption, it is also of no use whatsoever in solving conflict or preventing war between nations.  It couldn't  prevent the soccer war fought between El Salvador and Honduras in 1969 over a World Cup qualifying match.

The Lords Resistance Army insurgency has been causing horrific bloodshed in Uganda since 1987 and they couldn't even influence their biggest benefactor, and the worlds largest superpower, not to invade the tiny island of Grenada in 1983.

One shouldn't be surprised that a bloated ever expanding bureaucracy, stuffed with career diplomats, superannuated politicians with designs on becoming a world government, could be anything other than a very expensive talking shop. As it currently stands the UN's only purpose, other than making innumerable resolutions against Israel, is promoting global socialism and insulting the United States.
(See wars since 1945 here)

Accepting that the UN will not stop the carnage, it is worth looking at the current conflicts together with those that strut the world stage as peacemakers, to make sure that they are working for peace and actually deserve the accolades they get.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict can be laid firmly at the door of the European Union and its expansionists ambitions combined with the pathetically weak leadership and lack of resolve of the USA, Great Britain and the western powers.

Even the casual observer would know that President Putin is a Russian patriot seeking to return Mother Russia to her former glory. They would also know that he is a ruthless former leader of the KGB who knows his way around the geopolitical chessboard. Ukraine was part of the former empire situated on its Black Sea border. Any attempt to bring Ukraine into the EU and NATO was too close for comfort for Putin and was resisted, just as the USA resisted the Russian military presence in Cuba.

When the European Union started its expansionist policy in Ukraine what did they expect Putin to do? They stirred up a hornets nest and a civil war was the result. One would think that the EU's pompously named High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Baroness Ashton of Upholland, also considered to be one of the highest paid politicians on the planet, would be smarter than she actually is. The truth is that despite her title and remuneration package she is considered to be a complete waste of money and space.
(Ashton disaster story here)

It is worth noting that despite its incompetence and expansionist warmongering the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2012.

It would not be unreasonable to expect that those who have received the Nobel Peace Prize, and who accept the accolades and status that go with it, would lend themselves to be deployed into these volatile areas for the purposes of bringing peace.

As ISIS beheads and murders its way across Syria and Iraq and Hamas pours missiles indiscriminately into civilian areas of Israel, one is entitled to ask where is 2011 Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman? It looks like a perfect opportunity for a peacemaker to put her reputation to the test. She is of course a senior member of Yemen's Al-Islah political party, which is akin to the Muslim Brotherhood and which seeks to impose sharia law throughout the Muslim world and beyond. It is safe to say that peace is the last thing on her mind when it comes to Israel.

The 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner is too busy involved fundamentally transforming his homeland from the beacon of freedom and liberty into a third world socialist state to be bothered searching for peace in the worlds hotspots. He is also busy downgrading and eviscerating America's mighty military machine to the point where respect for it is being lost by its enemies.

The 2008 winner, former Finnish Prime Minister, Martii Ahtisaari, is anonymous so any peace making initiatives are not apparent. However, if he is working behind the scenes along with joint 2011 winners Leymah Gbowee and Ellen Sirleaf, good for them and they will deserve the world's thanks should they succeed.

The 2007 Peace Prize winner was the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). One can only imagine what the result would be if the mission of this nonsensical Panel was changed from imposing global socialism under the cover of environmentalism to actual peace making. It beggars belief that this gaggle of agenda driven bureaucrats can be considered as peacemakers.

Joint winner in 2007 with the IPPC was former Vice President and first carbon billionaire Al Gore. Even my fertile imagination is lost for words when trying to consider big Al as a peacemaker.

I could go on but my lack of knowledge about the previous winners would not be constructive to the debate but I hope that if they are still with us they are working for peace and earning their reputations as peacemakers.

I cannot however bypass the 2002 winner Jimmy Carter and the 2001 joint winners, Kofi Annan and the United Nations.

Carter has a reputation for doing good works such as eradicating Guinea worm infestations in West Africa but insulting Israel by referring to it as an apartheid state and making no comment about Muslim atrocities by Palestinian terrorists doesn't exactly signal impartiality. This renders him utterly useless as a peacemaker.

As mentioned previously the UN is nothing more than an expensive, corrupt bureaucracy which is obsessed with Israel, the USA and a global socialist government. Kofi Annan was its leader during a particularly bloody period and proved to be as ineffective as the organisation he ran.

If anyone can bring peace one would think it would be the Middle East Peace Envoy for the Quartet, after all this man represents four of the biggest players on the war and peace scene including some of the participants in the current Ukrainian disaster, the EU and Russia. Also in the Quartet are the UN and the USA.

Again one is entitled to expect that the combined might of these four entities led by a peacemaker of the calibre of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, would put an end to war wherever it flares up.

If anyone is curious as to why, considering his record as Prime Minister and after, Tony Blair was chosen to be a peace envoy then they would not be alone. They would be joined by the entire British nation who were fooled by the spin, deceit and lies of this awful man and who many believe to be an indictable war criminal.

While Blair has supposedly been working to bring peace to the middle east he has also been accumulating a personal fortune using contacts he made while in office and with some of the worlds most questionable characters. The peace envoys fortune is reputed to be anywhere between twenty and eighty million pounds. That's around thirty two or one hundred and twenty eight million US dollars. This includes a property portfolio of around eight properties including the former country estate of Sir John Gielgud and properties in London's exclusive Connaught Square.
(Blair story here)

Not bad for a former leader of the working mans party who once wrote to the then Labour Party leader, Michael Foot, that he "came to socialism via Marxism".

Blair would go down in history as just another socialist hypocrite if he was at least making some progress as a peace envoy but if the Palestinian leaders are anything to go by he is a disaster. In 2012, after almost a decade as peace envoy, they described him as:  "useless useless useless". This is probably the first time that the majority of the British people will agree with the Palestinian leadership.

In conclusion it must be noted that despite a plethora of internationally recognised peacemakers, wars continue and civilians are still being killed in their tens of thousands. Some peacemakers may be genuine and deserve the accolades and their reputations and some are just charlatans.

In one conflict there appears to be a light at the end of the tunnel and there is talk of Tony Blair being relieved of his post. If the speculation is true then that small spark of light will be extinguished by his reported replacement - none other than the superannuated High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Baroness Ashton of Upholland.
(Argh! Blair's replacement story here. Read this and weep)

Putin v The West - The KGB v The PR Department. We Reap What We Sow

As events in the Ukraine and Crimea unfold it is becoming increasingly obvious that the western leaders are not just being out maneuvered by Russia's Vladimir Putin but they are being shown up for what they actually are, media created PR men with no experience in the real world in which we the people abide.

Just a tertiary glance at the backgrounds, experience and accomplishments of the current western leaders reveals weaknesses that any self respecting tyrant in search of his country's lost glory would be a fool to pass up.

It goes without saying that the fearsome reputation of the KGB is well deserved and therefore anyone who leads this organization is by nature ruthless and single minded - in addition, any KGB leader will be well versed in international affairs and a master of strategy.

Vladimir Putin meets these criteria in abundance and in addition he has acquired a degree of Public Relations and media management skills that matches those on which his western foes are totally reliant.

Here is the public face of Putin that the world sees, flip through and enjoy.

While a young Putin was honing his skills in the KGB, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, was behaving like the upper class twit that he is by attending raves and wrecking restaurants as a member of the exclusive Bullington Club. After his exclusive education he spent a couple of years as a PR man for a failed television company before taking his leave of the real world by entering the closed, incestuous world of party politics.

His supposed successor, George Osborne, who is the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, was also an upper class Bullington Club twit but apparently he did gain some real world experience prior to entering party politics by enjoying cocaine fuelled sessions with dominatrix Natalie Rowe.

Here are the public faces of David Cameron and George Osborne. Please try not to laugh.

Here's George and Natalie.

Barack Obama, the current leader of the free world and Commander in Chief' of the mightiest military machine on the planet, spent his formative years smoking dope and spending his time with Marxist professors before taking up a career in community organizing. President Obama spent his formative years in Indonesia, Hawaii and the Peoples Republic of Chicago.

The last G8 was a classic example of  the mentality of Cameron and his PR men, the manufactured charade of a tieless, down to earth summit was so contrived and phony it was an embarrassment for the people of Great Britain.

One would think that the European Union which prides itself on having the political clout of nearly five hundred million people would have Putin quaking in his kerenky and scurrying back to Moscow.

Who wouldn't be worried with the EU's High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President if the European Union Commission beating a path to his door?

Vladimir Putin that's who. If the overtly pompous job title isn't enough to split ones side with laughter then the holder will most definitely cause a severe laceration.

The Right Honourable Baroness Ashton of Upholland is the official cover name for Cathy Ashton, a former hippy, serial supporter of left wing causes and the ultimate career bureaucrat. She has never held a proper job nor has she ever been elected to anything. She is one of the highest paid apparatchiks on earth and wields enormous political power, but sadly, in this new post democratic age, she has  been appointed and cannot be removed by the people no matter how destructive and incompetent she may be.

Here's the Baroness on the campaign trail.

One has to remember that Ashton was a Vice Chairperson and treasurer of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament which agitated for unilateral nuclear disarmament at the height of the Cold War. It is now coming to light that she accepted funding for her traitorous organization from the Soviet Union and they adopted the campaign slogan, "Better Red Than Dead".

More on the Baroness here.

Faced with this cast of characters and their priorities, is it any wonder that Vladimir Putin, who is desperate to return Russia to its former glory and influence, is behaving the way he is?

While Putin is running rampant around the globe and running rings around the western leaders, what exactly are their priorities?

State mandated equality and fairness is high on the agenda of both countries together with a plethora of trendy, bleeding heart, hand wringing, guilt ridden 'progressive' nonsense, designed to make the political class feel good about themselves and help them display their compassionate credentials on the world stage.

Other priorities include:

Minimum wage, soon to become Living wage.

Ensnaring more people into welfare dependency and entitlement addiction.

Imposing multi-culturalism via mass immigration and amnesty.

Downgrading the military and erasing their traditions and history. In the case of the USA, this includes feminizing as much as possible to ensure gender neutrality and gay friendliness.

Putting homosexuals on a pedestal, firstly with equal rights then with special rights and now with extra rights. This must be the most pampered minority group on earth bearing in mind their small numbers.

Wrecking traditional marriage and family life

Eradicating the western Judeo-Christian values and its moral compass and giving medieval death cults such as Islam, moral equivalence.

Impoverishing their respective peoples with spending, taxing, borrowing and debt for generations to come.

The list goes on and the longer it does the more Putin, and all the other enemies of the west, are emboldened. Unless something drastic happens and the people wake up to the danger, the west is doomed.

President Putin on western decline, read this and weep.

We the people are to blame - we've known for many years that the political class are out of control and treating us with contempt.

In Great Britain we know that the leaders of the three main parties share an identical agenda on the main issues. They are as one. We know that David Cameron, Nick Clegg and David Miliband hail from a remote elite with no affiliation with the people they are supposed to represent.

The same goes for President Obama.  Everyone knows he is a media created impostor and even when his first term turned out to be a disaster they fell for his spin a second time. The danger now is that like Great Britain, being lied to will be become a normal part of political discourse allowing politicians to get away with destructive policies and outright corruption.

As well as we the people, President Putin knows they are all media creations who are trained in the arts of media management, spin, deceit and lying and unlike Putin, we fall for their propaganda every time. The people are easily seduced with promises the politicians know they will not keep and we will lose our liberties and freedoms to become no better off than the unfortunates of Putin's prison states.

American blogger 90 Miles From Tyranny has put together a gallery of comparisons, well worth a look.

Netanyahu, Putin and Obama at age twenty three.

Vladimir Putin Vs Barack Obama - This is awesome.

Finally just for fun, guess the mystery world leader who would surely have sent Putin back to the Kremlin: Here and here.

Ukraine Crisis - Politicians Form A Queue To Dump Taxpayers Money

Conflicts around the world be they minor skirmishes of a local nature or larger in scale with loss of life or displacement of civilians, usually follow a familiar pattern. The current conflict in the Ukraine is no different and it is a classic example for students of current affairs and political behavior to study for their thesis or dissertations.

First there's the televised faux outrage by Heads of State or their mouthpieces, followed by some sabre rattling and threats of economic sanctions.

This period is usually followed by some ineffectual posturing at the United Nations and in the unlikely event that all parties can agree, maybe a resolution is issued condemning the bogyman of the day.

(This is dependent upon the UN bureaucrats taking time out from their full time occupation of passing resolutions condemning the USA or Israel)

Then as sure as night follows day comes the call for taxpayers money. Not just a little bit for emergency aid such as tents, blankets, bottled water or medical supplies, but shed loads of it, supposedly to help with reconstruction.

In the case of the Ukraine reconstruction of what is not immediately clear as the Ukrainian infrastructure is as modern as in most other countries in Europe, including and Russia, and the country has an acknowledged modern industrial base.

At the head of the queue with a taxpayer funded give away was the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne who, without consulting the people, generously offered Ukraine a blank cheque.

That was indeed very generous of him considering that infrastructure in Great Britain is badly in need of attention itself. As a result of a deliberate and unprecedented increase in the population, there is now a desperate shortage of houses, hospitals and schools.

Infrastructure such as sewers, water, electricity and gas supply lines, are in need of replacing along with roads, railways and airports that are in need of upgrading and expansion.

If the official statistics are to be believed, poverty in Great Britain has reached Dickensian levels of desperation with the use of food banks and homelessness at an all time high. Increasing numbers of people are finding themselves in fuel poverty with an extra thirty thousand deaths expected this winter due to hypothermia.

These 'excess deaths' as they are officially known are obviously considered a price worth paying in order to 'combat climate change' and the whole scam is a wonderful opportunity for politicians to posture on the world stage demonstrating their 'green' credentials. But I digress.

Next up was American Secretary of State, John  Kerry, offering an extra billion dollars of taxpayers hard earned money without consulting the peoples Congress first.

During the last two Presidential campaigns, in addition to a trillion dollar stimulus package, the call for increased infrastructure spending was relentless. Roads and bridges are falling apart and a totally new distribution system is needed to replace the conventional energy delivery with that of green energy.

John Kerry has been traversing the planet preaching that 'climate change' is the biggest threat to world peace in the history of civilization.  Therefore, with that in mind, the American taxpayers will be the main contributor to a one hundred billion dollar fund to help developing countries pay for the damage due to 'climate change' which, apparently, was selfishly caused by the west, and also to help them 'combat climate change' in the future. (Just to clarify, the one hundred billion dollars is an annual sum not just a one off payment)

American taxpayers also generously finance a fifty two billion dollar foreign aid budget which includes six hundred and fifteen million per year to oil rich Nigeria, six hundred and eighty eight million annually to Mexico and an eye watering four billion per year to the notoriously corrupt Mohammed Karsai government in Afghanistan.

Judging by the rate at which politicians spend taxpayers money in America, the country has got to be rolling in the stuff, they must be lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bills in Washington DC.

Hot on the heels of John Kerry was the European Union bureaucrats, led by the unelected political crony, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, with promises to Ukraine of a windfall of taxpayers money from her endless supply of it in Brussels.

Baroness Ashton labours under the grandiose title of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security and Vice President of the European Commission - this entitles her to a massive taxpayer funded remuneration package plus expenses and a gold plated pension on retirement. In addition, she is a member of the House of Lords for life which entitles her to another package of taxpayer funded allowances and expenses. (Three hundred quid per day just for turning up. That's around four hundred and eighty US Dollars)

Like their American cousins, there is apparently no shortage of British taxpayers money for these politicians and bureaucrats to spray around everywhere except to alleviate hardship in their home countries. These people have no respect for taxpayers money therefore they have no respect for the taxpayers themselves.

Also in the queue to dump money into the Ukraine are the IMF and the World Bank.

Having established that politicians and global institutions alike are lining up to hose money into the Ukraine, it's worth noting that like Great Britain, Greece and the rest of the European Union, the United States of America is broke, it has no money and it is fast running out of credit.

In order to look generous, and get the credit from the international aid industry, the politicians and bureaucrats are willfully ignoring the fact that the money being sprayed around belongs to the taxpayer - it is the fruit of their labour that has been confiscated under threat of imprisonment.

These self serving egotists are spending wages that are yet to be earned by people yet to be born. They are unconscionable, unscrupulous and utterly without principle.

The countries with the biggest national debts in the world include the USA, Great Britain, France and Germany.  These same countries have also been running the biggest budget deficits. Taxpayers from these countries are the biggest contributors to the international institutions that want to dump money into the Ukraine.

To put this into some kind of perspective - British government spending is running at a deficit of over one hundred and ten billion pounds per year and they have accumulated a national debt in excess of one trillion pounds. British taxpayers are already helping to finance the UN, the IMF and the World Bank.

They are also contributing close to forty billion pounds per year to the EU and will be handing out some fourteen billion per year on overseas aid to prosperous nations and dictators. Great Britain has a crumbling infrastructure, a shortage of houses, schools and hospitals; increasing numbers of people cannot pay their heating bills and rely on food banks to survive. The question that begs to be asked is:

Where is Chancellor Osborne getting the money from to give the Ukrainians a blank cheque?

With a seventeen trillion dollar debt and out of control government spending, the situation that American taxpayers find themselves in is no different, therefore the question equally applies to John Kerry:

Where is the extra one billion dollars coming from?

It should be borne in mind that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait UAE, Brazil, Norway, South Korean and Switzerland have little or no national debt and run small deficits or surpluses - one would think that these countries would be head of the queue to aid the Ukraine.

It's noticeable that the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emirs of the wealthy Arab states are missing from the airwaves joining the leaders of the other aforementioned affluent countries in anonymity and leaving the taxpayers of the bankrupt countries to help the Ukrainian people.

In conclusion it is worth pointing out that apart from an infrastructure compatible with any other industrialised country, the Ukraine is rich in natural resources such as iron ore, manganese, nickel and uranium with more than half the country consisting of arable agricultural land. The government of the Ukraine also has a reputation for reneging on its loans and debt repayments.

By any measure Ukraine is not a good risk for taxpayers money but that won't stop the politicians when there is an opportunity to preen themselves on the world stage polishing their egos and their compassionate credentials.



Finally a little light relief from Abba:


I work all night,  I work all day to pay the bills I have to pay

Ain't it sad

And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me

That's too bad

Money Money Money, must be funny, in the rich mans world

Money Money Money, always sunny, in the rich mans world

Aha Ahaa

All the things that I could do

If I had a little money, in the rich mans world.

Listen to it here and you'll be singing it to yourself all day.

President Putin - Macho Man Gives Uncle Sam And John Bull A Spanking

Watching President Putin control events as they unfold in the Ukraine and the subsequent reaction of the American and British governments, it's painfully obvious that the two so called 'leaders of the free world' are totally unsuitable for the offices they hold. It's hard to recall two leaders who have been so comprehensively humiliated than Barry Obama and David 'Call Me Dave" Cameron since Neville Chamberlain was humiliated by Hitler in the lead up to World War II.

Taking into account the background and ideologies of these three players, should anyone be surprised that events have turned out the way they have?

Vladimir Putin epitomises the mighty Russian Bear and portrays an image of strength and patriotism while Barry Obama portrays an image of a gender neutral Uncle Sam banging on about American arrogance, the minimum wage and the imminent threat of climate change.

Similarly, David  Cameron portrays the image of an archetypal chinless wonder continually banging on about 'his firmly held beliefs' in equality, overseas aid, the European Union, marriage for homosexuals and, surprise, surprise, the imminent threat of climate change.

The finer details on the political history of the Ukrainian conflict I will leave to others but looking at the personal histories of the players, combined with their words and actions, it should be obvious that this conflict was coming and it must rank as the eighth wonder of the world that it hasn't happened sooner.

There are thousands of column inches, together with countless hours of airtime, dedicated to the conflict in the Ukraine and its possible outcomes, but not much as been written about how this conflict came to unfold and how it is the precursor to conflicts elsewhere in the world.

Vladimir Putin is a cold, calculating political thug and Russian patriot. The former leader of the KGB, he is well versed in the Machiavellian arts of power grabbing and he has played his part in reducing geo-political governance and diplomacy into to a blood soaked game of chess. He doesn't claim to hold the moral high ground, in fact the opposite is true, he has let it be known he is more than happy to use overwhelming lethal force and oppression to expand his power and influence.

It has been written that as a Russian patriot he was devastated at the fall of the Soviet Union and its loss of pride and influence.  It also written that he is dedicated to restoring that pride and restoring Russia to its former glory.

He has ditched communism and state mandated equality in favour of a free enterprise system which, as it stands at present, is far from perfect - it is however responsible for raising the living standards for tens of millions of Russians.

The people of Russia and the world see, and more importantly they perceive, a strong leader who puts the well being of his country and its pride before ideology - a rugged man of the people who indulges in macho outdoor pursuits and who will stand up and be counted for his beloved Mother Russia.

The contrast between the experienced, worldly wise Putin, Barry Obama and his soul mate David Cameron couldn't be more stark. Obama and Cameron are both PR men and media created phony's who are totally divorced from the people they claim to represent. Both were exclusively educated, neither has had anything resembling a job in the real world and the only people they know and associate with come from the same like minded elite together with the hangers-on who have a vested interest in keeping them in power.

They are both self described 'progressives' and share a common agenda based not on individual liberty and small government, but on the state regulating and controlling all aspects of human life, including equality, fairness, the environment and, laughably, the global climate.

Both Obama and Cameron are busy downgrading their respective military machines and in the case of Obama, humiliating them in the process. Cameron is eviscerating the British military in preparation for its absorption into the European Defence Force (EDF), while Obama is eviscerating his on 'progressive' ideological grounds.

It doesn't stretch the imagination too much to see how the dismantling of these mighty military machines and the trashing of their fearsome reputations is playing with the enemies of western civilization.

The American military was fast becoming a laughing stock when President Bill Clinton started his 'don't ask, don't tell' nonsense. Now the 'pussification' of the American military knows no bounds as Obama goes hell for leather to downgrade it before his second term is up. Nothing demonstrates this more than his administrations insistence that gays serve openly and that the once fearsome American Marine Corps adopt a gender neutral hat.

With morale in the American military at a new low, how do they imagine this gay obsession and downgrading is playing on the Steppes of Russia and in the Ukraine?  How do they think it's going down with Kim Jong Un in North Korea, or the Ayatollahs in Iran and the rest of the Muslim world?

How do they imagine this is going down with the Taliban and the Mullahs in Helmand Province or with the medieval goat herders and stink beards in the tribal areas of Waziristan?

Never mind what Britain's enemies are thinking, what does David Cameron imagine serving military personnel are thinking when IRA killers are given amnesty while long retired members of the Parachute Regiment are under threat of prosecution 40 years after they were sent to fight in the streets of Northern Ireland?

What must Britain's enemies be thinking when they see compensation paid to a terrorist suspect who was shouted at and who received a black eye under interrogation, while a member of the Royal Marines rots in jail for dispatching a Taliban terrorist he was sent to Afghanistan to kill?

While these two pansies impose their 'progressive' agenda on their respective peoples, play golf, do the school run, cook supper, go on vacations and obsess about homosexuality and fairness, Vladimir Putin is hunting, shooting, fishing, riding horses and killing his countries enemies without mercy.

What must the Russians have been thinking when Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton 'pushed the reset button' on Russo-American relations? What must they be thinking now when the self loathing America hater, 'Hanoi John Kerry, has replaced Clinton. It must be Christmas, Easter and the Russian New Year rolled into one.

With the world going to hell in a hand cart, 'Hanoi' John is spending his time on the 'progressives' favourite pastime of helping the Palestinians erase the only open democracy in the Middle East off the face of the earth.

Surrounded by barbaric blood drenched theocracies and tyrannies, Israel is a multi-party democracy with separation powers, an independent judiciary, a free press and equal status for all citizens; be they Jew, Christian, Muslim or other.

With Venezuela and the Ukraine going up in flames, with the Mediterranean countries of the EU reduced to poverty and misery along with Ireland and Portugal, with Iran on the brink of making a nuclear bomb, with North Korea lobbing missiles into the China Sea, with Al Qaeda on the brink of retaking power in Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama and Kerry give priority to threatening Israel if they don't sign a peace agreement with the terrorists who are committed to its destruction..

In conclusion it must be noted that every leader from President Putin, Kim Jong Un, the Ayatollahs and the Mullahs have watched the pathetic posturing and social engineering of western leaders like Obama and Cameron and they have become emboldened, they no longer fear or respect the American or British military machines.

This has led to a more dangerous world as any tin pot dictator or Toytown tyrant will fancy his chances against what used to be the greatest military and political machines on the planet.

An excellent must read post from the Mellow Jihadi.

Update: Related article from The Daily Telegraph

Ukraine, Venezuela Or Great Britain - It's Socialism So What's The Difference?

To those people around the world who have the ability to analyse history and recognize socialism for what it is, the violent events in the Ukraine and Venezuela will come as no surprise.

What does come as a surprise is the meek acceptance of the disastrous consequences of socialism in Great Britain, which has been accepted by the people with hardly a pipsqueak of protest. On contrary if the latest polls are correct, a general election held tomorrow would produce a socialist Labour government, if not outright then in coalition with the equally appalling Liberal Democrats.

Red Ed Miliband would be Great Britain's first openly Marxist Prime Minister and the man who wrecked the economy with his socialist policies during the Blair/Brown reign of terror, Ed Balls, would be in control of the nations finances once again.

It's as if the disastrous events in France, just twenty two miles across the English Channel, have never happened let alone the events in the Ukraine and Venezuela some fifteen hundred and five thousand miles away respectively.

In a direct imitation of the British political class, the ruling political class in the Ukraine are ignoring the wishes of the people and taking the country in a direction they do not want to go - in this case into the arms of Presidents Putin's authoritarian socialist Russia. Ironically they would rather take the road to Europe which is an expensive imitation of the former Soviet Union. The lesser of two evils is obviously preferable.

In the new post democratic age, like the British and the rest of the EU, the Ukrainian people have been disenfranchised and consequently they have no option apart from a violent uprising.

This is what people making themselves heard looks like in the Ukraine.

It's a similar story in Venezuela where the history of socialist failure has repeated itself again with tedious predictability. The ruling class have managed to wreck an economy and a country that is rich in natural resources including oil, natural gas, gold and diamonds.

It is now universally accepted that socialism and authoritarianism go hand in hand, therefore the corrupt political class in Venezuela are responding to the people's call for change with violent suppression.

This is what people making themselves heard looks like in Venezuela.

Venezuelan socialism in action here

In Great Britain (and coming to America soon) the ruling political class are ignoring the will of people and imposing their socialist agenda which, in Great Britain's case, includes absorption into a post democratic, Soviet style United States of Europe, accompanied by a fundamental transformation into a so called 'multi-cultural' society.

This un-homogenizing of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture, which has evolved over thousands of years, is ethnic cleansing using politically correct methods and terminology.

The consequences have been disastrous for the British people with their once green and pleasant land now turned into a series of vile, crime ridden mono-cultural cesspits, riddled with idleness and welfare dependency.

Whole villages, towns and areas of cities have been totally taken over by immigrant communities that have been encouraged not to integrate but to maintain their cultures and practices, some of which are barbaric and belong in the dark ages.

Unlike their counterparts in the Ukraine and Venezuela, the once formidable British people have not risen up in violent protest but rolled over and had their tummies tickled like puppies begging for a another treat.

The formidable British Bulldog spirit that defeated the Kaiser and stood alone against the Nazi war machine, that Bulldog spirit that fought valiantly around the world from the jungles of Burma to Korea, that Bulldog spirit that travelled half way around the planet to kick General Galtieri and his military machine off the Falkland Islands, has all but disappeared.

A sizable portion of the British people have forgotten their illustrious past and now fret about trendy, heart bleeding issues such as gay marriage or horse meat in their supermarket burgers. They need to understand that when they are absorbed into the EU, horse meat will become their staple diet.

It is not strictly true that the British accept their lot peacefully, without a whimper of protest. There have been regular violent protests by sections of the population, with those that have been imported as part of the ethnic cleansing agenda taking the lead.

This what Muslim people making themselves heard looks like in Great Britain.

This is what immigrant people making themselves heard looks like in Great Britain.

As a matter of fact rioting and violence by immigrants demanding more or protesting against their lot in life as been a regular occurrence since the 'progressive' political class embarked upon their transformational agenda.(See here for a previous post including a list of ethnic violence).

On the face of it, it looks like the ruling political class has won and their transformation of Great Britain from a green and pleasant land based on freedom and individual liberty into a socialist, multi-cultural hell hole, is with us for ever but it would be foolish to write of the Brits just yet.

Maybe, just maybe, they will awaken from their socialist induced slumber, revisit their illustrious past, rediscover their Bulldog spirit and do what is necessary to take their country back.

They can make a start at next years elections and kick the traitors out, every last one of them.