Phony Outrage As Boris Prorogues Parliament

One can judge whether a course of action is correct by the reaction of one’s opponents and in the case of the proroguing Parliament by Her Majesty the Queen at the request of Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, this is absolutely the right thing to do.

For the uninitiated, proroguing is the constitutional procedure which is used to bring a session of Parliament to an end in order that a new legislative session can begin.

The phony outrage of the political class and the deliberately whipped up hysteria that has greeted this legitimate constitutional action speaks volumes about the Europhile snowflakes and the current occupants of Great Britain's once respected legislative institution.

The justification for their outrage and hysteria is as phony as they are and riddled with lies and deception.

These Parliamentarians claim to be the stalwart defenders of democracy so it’s worth reminding ourselves of the circumstances that led up this phony constitutional crisis and how duplicitous these people are.

Parliament legislated for a once in a lifetime, winner-take-all, binding referendum in June 2016 to settle the contentious issue of Great Britain’s membership of the European Union.

In defiance of Parliament and despite a campaign of fear, the people voted to leave the European Union in the biggest exercise of democracy in the country’s history.

In the 2017 general election, eighty percent of the votes went to parties who committed in their election manifestos to implement the result of the referendum. No one knew at the time that they were lying and had no intention of implementing the result.

After an inexplicable delay which allowed the Europhiles to regroup and plan their campaign to overturn the result, Parliament finally legislated to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which was the mechanism for leaving the corrupt and failing EU.

This meant a transition period and a leaving date on  March 29^th, 2019; a date that will live in infamy. The self-appointed stalwart defenders of democracy made sure that this didn’t happen, and a new leaving date of October 31^st, 2019 replaced it as the law of the land.

The same Parliamentarians who made this leaving date the law of the land are claiming that it is undemocratic to implement it.  Even by their standards of deception this is turning the truth on its head in true Orwellian fashion.  

This is the crux of the matter so it’s worth repeating in order for it to sink in; Parliamentarians are claiming that it’s undemocratic to implement the law of the land that they themselves passed through Parliament and put on the Statute Book.

It's an extraordinary claim that by proroguing Parliament democracy has been suspended when they have used every dirty trick in the Parliamentary book to subvert democracy in order to reverse the result of the Brexit referendum.

It is also an extraordinary claim that ending the session on the proposed date robs them of four days debate on the Brexit issue when they have spent three years debating the subject with the intention of delaying Great Britain’s exit, ad infinitum.

They claim that prorogation is an abuse of Parliamentary procedures when, with the aid of the hideously biased Speaker of the House, John Bercow, they have driven a coach and horses through these same procedures especially with respect to the tabling and choosing amendments and motions that frustrate Brexit.

They have ignored the fact that Prime Minster, John Major, prorogued Parliament for six long weeks to avoid acting on a Parliamentary expenses scandal.

To their eternal shame, Europhile Members used a convicted criminal who was out of jail on license and being monitored by the police with an ankle tag, to cast the winning vote in piece of anti-Brexit legislation.

Their claim that Parliament is sovereign raises two important issues that exposes these people for the charlatans that they are.

It is the people who are sovereign not Parliament and when Parliament is given a direct order by the people it is not up for discussion or debate, they must carry it out. The people were asked whether to leave the European Union or remain and they voted to leave. That is the end of the issue, leave we must.

Secondly, despite repeated assurances that no Parliamentary sovereignty will be surrendered by joining the Common Market, which was the precursor to the European Union, treacherous politicians surrendered virtually all the peoples’ sovereignty by stealth over four decades to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

By transferring the peoples’ sovereignty to Brussels, Parliamentarians will have no legislative function other than giving national legitimacy to legislation given to then by the unelected European Union Commissioners; in effect they will have reduced themselves to a rubber stamp.

The once respected Mother of Parliaments is nothing more than an expensive talking shop comprised of almost fifteen hundred redundant legislators with an army of civil servants and other faceless bureaucrats.

To conclude, the people voted to take the legislative functions of Parliament back from Brussels to Westminster, but the self-appointed stalwart defenders of democracy don’t want it.

In fact, they are fighting tooth and nail to prevent it from happening. By proroguing Parliament Boris Johnson is making sure that these democracy deniers are thwarted in their attempts to stop Brexit by making sure that the law of the land is implemented, and the British people regain their independence in accordance with the law on October 31^st, 2019.    

Trump Derangement Syndrome Spreads To Great Britain

The visceral hatred of President Donald Trump by Leftists has become a phenomenon to behold. The hysteria stoked up by the bought-and-paid-for media causes a demented reaction by people many would consider to be intelligent and well balanced.

With the proposed state visit of the President to Great Britain, the Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) that has infected the American political class and its media has spread across the Atlantic Ocean like plague of biblical proportions.

Along with the usual suspects from the media and the acting fraternity, other prominent people such as the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, the Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow and the Leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition in Parliament, Jeremy Corbyn, have lost any trace of self-awareness they may have once held along with any sense of perspective.

One of the reasons given for the animosity and hatred directed at President Trump is his supposedly divisive rhetoric. This triggers the over sensitive snowflakes that are churned out daily by the politicized education system and the permanently offended who latch on to any word or sentence they can exploit for political gain.

In line with what has become normal practice by the Left in lieu of sensible discourse, name calling and labelling to denigrate and smear are used in spades against President Trump in order to generate hatred and opposition to his visit.

Among others, the most popular and overused accusations are that he is as racist and a misogynist (yawn). To these golden oldies we can add newer more trendy smears such as white supremacist, white nationalist and xenophobe.

For good measure, it’s worth noting that a non-existent ban on Muslims entering the United States is used to accuse the President of Islamophobia especially by the Muslim Mayor of London Sadiq Khan who I will return to later.

It is worth looking at President Trump’s proposed state visit from the perspective of previous state visits and from the accusations and labels applied to him.

The long-term brutal dictator of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, was given the full royal treatment in 2002 despite enslaving, torturing and killing his own people.

Known by his citizens as Butcher Bob, President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe was also given the full royal treatment despite the mass murder of his political enemies during his reign of terror. During his visit Butcher Bob was made an Honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Bath which was later rescinded.

No introduction or explanation is required for the honored guest President Vladimir Putin of Russia.

President Nicolae Ceausescu of Romania was the first Communist leader to be given a state visit. Such was his popularity at home he was put up against a wall and shot along with his wife on Christmas Day 1989.

Other mass murderers and tyrants who have been honored with a state visit include Mobuto Sese Seko of Zaire who embezzled 12 billion pounds from the county's treasury and murdered 230,000 of his own citizens and General Suharto of Indonesia who killed over 1 million people during his invasion of East Timor. (Read about them here)

Besides being outside his remit as Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan wants President Trump banned from Great Britain but he welcomes hate preachers and radical Muslims with open arms. While Mayor Khan is interfering in matters of state, London, which is his remit, is descending with depressing speed into a third world toilet where murder, rape and violent crime are out of control.

It is the prerogative of the Speaker of the House of Commons to invite foreign leaders to address Parliament. The incumbent is a Trump hater and TDS sufferer, John Bercow, who is refusing to invite President Trump for no logical reason other than his personal hatred and animosity toward him.

This courtesy has been extended in the past to tyrants and mass murderers like President Xi Jinpin of China, Khrushchev, Kosygin, Yeltsin and Gorbachov of Russia and Daniel Ortega the communist dictator of Nicaragua. (Read about Bercow's hatred for President Trump here and the politicians hatred for him here)

With reference to the charge of misogyny, the women abusing Emir of Kuwait and King of Saudi Arabia have both been visitors and, without complaint from anyone, the serial woman abuser and rapist President Bill Clinton visited Great Britain on at least three occasions.

Lastly the biggest Trump hater of them all, the communist anti-American, anti-Semitic leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition in Parliament, Jeremy Corbyn, has announced in advance that he will not be attending any functions with President Trump including a state banquet to be held in his honor.

For the record, Jeremy Corbyn has met and socialized with the Leaders of the Irish Republican Army (IRA) while they were murdering innocent British civilians by the hundreds. He has also met and socialized with the terrorist leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah who he considers to be his friends.

This despicable creature refuses to meet President Trump but unashamedly attended a wreath laying ceremony at the graves of the terrorists who massacred Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympic Games in 1972.

To conclude: looking at the unsavory characters that have visited Great Britain and been feted in the past, one has to wonder why such hate and opprobrium is levelled at President Trump who is a saint by comparison.

The truth is that Donald J Trump, a businessman and patriot, took on the ruling elite along with the establishment and the media and won to become President of the most powerful nation on earth.

He has made no secret of his intention to put America and the American people first, to protect and secure her borders and to fight the globalists and their attempt to impose a centrally controlled, supranational government on the sovereign nations of the world.

                                        God Bless President Trump and God Bless America   

Mass Immigration Disaster - Speaker Bercow Joins The Quislings

If there is any doubt about the unanimity of the political class, regardless of party affiliation, to the fundamental transformation of Great Britain, then the treacherous behavior of the supposedly neutral Speaker of the House of Commons while visiting Romania should dispel it once and for all.

The shameful utterances of John Bercow to the Romanian political class were not only an insult to the British people they were also thoroughly dishonest. More importantly they were a clear demonstration of how committed the all party political establishment is to the 'progressive' cultural replacement agenda.

In what appears to be an unintended consequence, the pig ignorant Bercow also gave an indication of his contempt for the free press for reporting the truth as it is, not as he would want it to be reported.

While Britain's PR made Prime Minister 'Call Me Dave' Cameron is lying to the British people about making their country unattractive to the hordes of welfare tourists and criminals who are about to descend on their country, John Bercow is rolling out the welcome mat in the belly of the beast itself in Bucharest.

Deliberately ignoring the appalling behavior of the Romanian immigrants already in Great Britain, Bercow states that "I want to underline the fact that there has been an important wave of immigrants that came to Great Britain from new member states and in many cases they came with aptitudes and a commitment, an involvement we haven't seen in our own workforce".

Bercow should have made it clear that he was referring to the motivation of the indigenous career welfare benefit scroungers that the British political class has deliberately created, but by using the term "our own workforce" he is suggesting that the entire British workforce lacks the same aptitude, commitment or involvement that a potential Romanian immigrant may have.

Speaker Bercow was deliberately lying off course in order to make a case for further the Romanian immigration that has been ordered by the real rulers of Great Britain, the European Union totalitarians from Brussels.

Bercow conveniently didn't mention the fact that of the 60,000 Romanian immigrants already in Great Britain, 28,000 have been arrested in connection with:

10 murders,

142 rapes,

666 sex crimes,

303 robberies,

1,370 burglaries,

2,902 acts of violence.

In 2012 there were 624 Romanians in British prisons compared with 454 in 2011.

Romanians perpetrate 92% of thefts from cash machines.

There are 28,000 mostly British victims of Romanian criminals that Bercow conveniently ignores in his quest to encourage the mass immigration decided upon by the treacherous political class.

Speaker Bercow also chooses to ignore the camps of Romanian beggars and criminals that blight the landscape including some of Great Britain's iconic landmarks such as Marble Arch and Hyde Park corner.

The authoritarian instincts of the European Union inspired political class are on display with Bercow's comments on the media.

Bercow states that "the media coverage of immigration did not reflect the views of Parliament or the government".

He is obviously unaware that in a free country the media are not supposed to be spinners for the government, they have a duty to report the news as they see it not the views of Parliament or the government.

In any event the views of Parliament and the government should be those of the people they are paid to represent. The fact that they do not is an indication of the yawning chasm between the politicians and the people.

The disastrous open border mass immigration policy was not asked for by the British people nor were they consulted, they will, however, have to suffer the consequences that taxpayer funded politicians like Bercow will not.

The supposedly neutral Speaker of the House of Commons has surrendered that neutrality and come down firmly on the side of the other traitors and Quislings who are busy selling out the country and its people to the unelected totalitarians of the European Union.

                                                   ******************************


*On a personal note: I have been travelling extensively for the past 6 weeks in both the USA and the UK, mixing mainly with ordinary working class people. It was excellent and I hope to share some of the attitudes I encountered in future posts. Thank you for your patience.

John Bercow And The Den Of Thieves

As I reflect upon the appalling behavior of the political elite and the public's reaction to it, I am reminded of an interview from the 70's with a lady from a battered womens' refuge in Chiswick, West London.

The husband of the lady in question would beat the living daylights out of her every day on his return from work before calmly sitting down to his evening meal.

The reason this lady gave for not running away was that her father regularly beat her mother, so she presumed this kind behavior was normal in a marriage plus, she added, it happened so often she came to expect it.

The shocking part was that she claimed she still loved her husband and that he loved her.

The conclusion of this sad story was that the lady was given counselling and educated to the fact that there is no love in an abusive relationship, her husband had no respect for her, he beat her because he could and he knew he would get away with it.

With her newly acquired self respect she exposed her husband to the media, she then had him prosecuted and thrown in the slammer.

The happy conclusion to this sad story was that the lady met up with a new partner and was in the process of a divorce with a plan to remarry.

Whenever I read about the behavior of our political elite my mind goes back to that interview all those years ago. Although there is no violence involved, the relationship between politicians and those they govern is, none the less, an abusive one but without the happy ending.

Politicians from both Houses of Parliament were helping themselves to shed loads of taxpayers money by exploiting an expenses system that was so corrupt it would make an African dictator blush. The public knew their representatives were cheating but were blissfully unaware of the extent of it.

When the Honourable Members of the House of Commons fought tooth and nail against a Freedom Of Information request to make their expense claims public, the peoples suspicions were aroused.

This suppression of transparency was successful and the public would have been none the wiser but for a whistleblower who made the information available to the Daily Telegraph who subsequently published it.

The reaction was volcanic, the public were appalled by the scale of the thievery but more importantly by the utter contempt and disrespect that these venal low life's had for the people they claimed to be representing.

Members from all parties were involved including millionaires and senior Members of the government.

The complete sorry details are too numerous to list here but they are available elsewhere on the Internet. The most notorious claims such duck houses and moat clearing have now entered into British political folklore.

MP's were indignant that they were exposed and went into a damage limitation mode as a matter of urgency. Some of the thieves were prosecuted and served time in the slammer, others lost their seats in the next election but by far the majority got away with it unpunished and with their loot intact.

To the disgust of these so called Honourable Members the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority was set up to monitor their activities and end the abuses. There's been a war of attrition between them ever since.

Despite the efforts of IPSA, MP's are still finding ways to help themselves to taxpayers money.

Recently there was the hard left champion of the poor and downtrodden, Ms Linda Riordan, renting out her taxpayer funded house to a fellow socialist, who then charged that rent to the taxpayer. Riordan then billed the taxpayer again for accommodation for herself. She makes some money and taxpayer gets screwed. As it turns out there were several other MP's pulling the same scam.

The public were outraged at this scam but only for the duration of the 24 hour news cycle, nothing surprises them anymore, like the battered lady at the beginning of the essay, the people now treat this disgraceful behavior as normal, they have come to expect it.

On the day that the convicted thief and career socialist Margaret Moran was spared prison on the grounds of her depression, (depression at getting caught no doubt), it was announced that the Speaker of the House, a tax cheat himself, John Bercow, has been enlisted by MP's to rig the makeup of IPSA.

Four independent members of IPSA have resigned as a result of this attempt at rigging. There can only be one reason for this, MP's do not like public scrutiny of their shenanigans and would like to get back to fleecing the taxpayer unobserved.

The reputation of politicians has never been lower but with tribal voting and a lack of scrutiny by the majority of the media they are safe in the knowledge that they have a taxpayer funded job for life, a copper bottomed pension and a lucrative sinecure on retirement.

Like the battered lady from the refuge, the people will continue to vote for the venal, self centered dregs of society until they are counselled and educated to regain their dignity and self respect.

They can then file for divorce, kick the villains out and find new partners who have their interests in mind.