Trump Hatred - British Political Hypocrites Vent Their Phony Anger

The anti-Trump hysteria that is currently sweeping across the world is an indication that the newly elected President of the United States has set about reversing the ‘fundamental transformation’ of America embarked upon by the Obama administration from the greatest and most prosperous nation on earth into a mediocre third world  backwater.

This regressive ‘fundamental transformation’ was an integral part of the UN/EU globalist post war plan to create a borderless, egalitarian one world which President Trump has vowed to destroy by putting the interests of the American people first.

It’s also a clear demonstration of the awesome power that the UN/EU globalists can unleash when their progress toward a borderless, egalitarian one world government is threatened. The media machine at their disposal has whipped up such hatred and hysteria across the planet riots have broken out in American cities and cities across the world against President Trump.

 What should worry freedom lovers everywhere is that this hysteria is being deliberately whipped up using censorship, distortion and outright lies and this is leading to a breakdown of civil order, rioting and urban violence.

One would expect politicians, especially those from the Mother of Parliaments to show a modicum of honor with regard to the truth and disavow this deliberate stoking of hatred using distortion and lies.

Looking at the Parliamentary rabble that is most vocal in the anti-Trump hate campaign it is clearly apparent that their sole reason for living is to impose their ideologically driven agenda on the country therefore the truth is treated as an enemy to be defeated.

The visceral hatred for America and its capitalist system, albeit somewhat degraded, and the dream of its demise lies at the heart of every socialist/communist/liberal and in their malignant minds justifies the use of censorship, distortion and lies.

The British Parliament lost its reputation as the Mother of Parliaments long ago when elected office became a well remunerated career financed by the taxpayer as opposed to a public duty. The latest anti-American rant by the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons is a clear indication of how low this venerable institution has sunk.

The House of Commons is infested with hundreds of self-loathing, capitalist hating, socialist hypocrites who despise America and its dedication to individual liberty and constitutionally limited government; to illustrate the point I will highlight two of the most odious.

Harriet Harman, a vocal man hating feminist has been a Member of Parliament  since 1982, has vowed to empty chair President Trump should he visit stating that she “could not be there clapping a man who is a self-confessed groper”.

Firstly, a bit of locker room banter uttered in jest over decade or so ago doesn’t make President Trump a serial groper.

Secondly, in a nauseating display of monumental hypocrisy Harman may not be prepared to clap a mythical self-confessed groper but she is more than happy to clap former President Bill Clinton who is not just a self-confessed groper but a self-confessed sex pest, a serial abuser of women and a rapist when he addressed Parliament.

She also has nothing to say about former French Presidents Francois Mitterrand or Nicholas Sarkozy, one a bigamist and the other a serial womanizer who abused his wife, both of whom also addressed the Mother of Parliaments during her tenure.

More disgustingly, the not so pure and wholesome Harman was associated with the Pedophile Information Exchange, a vile organization that campaigned for sex between children and adults to be legalized.

Yvette Cooper, a former government Minister who entered Parliament in 1997, is another social hypocrite who uses distortion and lies to smear and delegitimize President Trump.

According to Cooper, “a Trump speech would fly in face of what Labour has worked for”. Since President Trump has not made a speech yet, and the world could be an entirely different place in the near future, she has no idea what it would contain. This statement is deliberately provocative as well as being evidence of Cooper’s hidden powers of clairvoyance.

Cooper is deliberately stirring up anti-Trump hatred using distortion and lies when she adds that “the idea that we are all going to sit in Parliament and listen to a man that is turning the clock back on democracy, pushing misogyny and hatred of Muslim is a joke”.

This statement is the work of a professional politician skilled in the dark arts of subliminal messaging and propaganda.

By using the word “we” she is giving the impression that she speaks for the entire six hundred and fifty Members of Parliament who are unanimous in their disapproval of President Trump. This is patently not true.

She offers no evidence or examples where President Trump is “turning back the clock on democracy”, this statement is designed to imply that he is anti-democracy and therefore the ludicrous charge of Fascist is justified.

It beggars belief that Cooper wants to be taken seriously when she claims that President Trump is “pushing misogyny and hatred of Muslims” when abuse of women is an integral part of Islam and misogyny is practiced by Muslim men in Great Britain without let or hindrance by politicians including herself and her ultra-feminist colleague, Harriet Harman.

Cooper and Harman know full well that female genital mutilation, child brides, incest, pedophilia, spousal abuse and so-called ‘honor killings’ are rife in Great Britain and since action to stamp them out is not forthcoming because of political correctness and their agenda to impose ‘multi-culturalism, it is safe to assume that they tacitly approve.

Students of the modern political class will know immediately that the statement was deliberately designed to stir up hatred in the Muslim communities by labelling President Trump as a racist and Islamophobe.

In conclusion: Harman and Cooper are only two of the hundreds of globalists in Parliament who have witnessed their ‘progressive’ agenda slowly disappear with the election of Donald Trump and the vote by the British people to regain their sovereignty and become an independent nation once again.

This Trump hatred hysteria is not an isolated response to a proposed visit by an unpopular American President. These people are fanatics who will not accept Brexit or the Trump Presidency; they will fight with everything at their disposal for the ideology that dominates their lives. These insults, lies and smears will only get worse as their beloved project disappears further into the dustbin of history with every passing day.

     

Modern Propaganda - The Mayor, The Junkie And The Punk Rocker

With a general election coming ever closer in Great Britain and the century long grip of the corrupt political establishment over British life being threatened like never before, it promises to be one of the dirtiest campaigns ever.

Nobody can dispute that the political establishment has the British institutions firmly under its control. This includes the machinery of government itself. One only has to scratch the surface of any institution to find the grubby fingers of the establishment manipulating and corrupting events in order to pursue its own agenda. This agenda includes its own preservation in power as its topmost priority.

Just a partial lifting the lid off the Civil Service, the Quangocracy, the NHS, the police, the military, the judiciary, the Bank of England, local government bureaucracies, the Church of England etc. etc. will reveal an infestation of like minded operatives, apparatchiks and political cronies manipulating events to preserve establishment control.

All these institutions are brought into play during election campaigns in order to influence the eventual result but none more so than the BBC and the rest of the government-media axis.

Modern elections are not decided by the merits of each party's policies or the quality of the various candidates, they are decided by the slickness and plausibility of the media campaigns.

Political scientists, pollsters and focus groups decide what promises they need to make to the various demographic, socio-economic, ethnic or religious groups in their particular part of the country. They then leave it to the party political PR machines to design the individual media campaigns.

These party machines are made up of advertising executives, spin doctors, PR men, image consultants, media management experts and most shamefully, rebuttal and smear units.

The individual candidates are irrelevant as they are indistinguishable from each other. They tend to come from similar backgrounds who share the establishment agenda and who possess the inherent ability to hold conflicting views simultaneously while lying with a straight face at the same time.

The entrenched political establishment and its hegemony over British life has been threatened like never before by the inexorable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, universally referred to as UKIP.

This party believes that Great Britain should remain an independent, sovereign nation engaging with the world, as opposed to surrendering its sovereignty to unaccountable bureaucrats while becoming a minor province in an incestuous, post-democratic United States of Europe.

The three establishment parties, Conservative, Labour and the increasingly ludicrous Liberal Democrat party, are all committed to the United States of Europe. Subsequently they are joining forces to fight UKIP in order to preserve their hegemony over the British people while keeping their pro-EU agenda intact.

UKIP's anti-EU message is resonating with the people therefore the legacy parties have to resort to smear in order to compete and there is no better smear than the word "racist".

"Racist" is now the establishment's favourite smear and the one most frequently used, not only to smear opponents, but to close down any meaningful discussion on their common policy of open border mass immigration. In utter desperation the Labour Party has instructed its canvassers to change the subject if electors mention it during the campaign.

UKIP's policy on immigration is well known and supported by the majority of the British people. They are pro-immigration, preferring a managed points system similar to Australia and Canada as opposed to the free for all open border mass immigration as practiced by the three legacy parties.

The fact that the government-media axis can mobilise three apparently diverse and unconnected public figures to smear UKIP and its supporters as "racists" demonstrates its power over the media along with their desperation.

The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson has smeared as racist, not just UKIP and its supporters, but tens of millions of British people who oppose open border mass immigration. Johnson's media managers and image consultants portray him as an intelligent, highly educated anti-establishment rebel who's rebelliousness manifests itself as genial buffoonery.

The fact is that Johnson is a bought-and-paid-for member of the establishment who along with Prime Minister David Cameron, Chancellor George Osborne and the other legacy party leaders is fully committed to the EU project and its cultural replacement agenda.

At the same time as Johnson was smearing UKIP and the British people, the media's favourite celebrity junkie was doing the same.

One cannot be sure whether Russell Brand is having a lucid moment when he uses the racist smear or his drug addled brain is controlling his oral output. Either way its a pity that he gets credence for his ramblings because its a sad reflection of the intellectual standard of his millions of followers.

Brand also took Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to task for linking the Sydney Lindt Cafe terrorist outrage to Islam. This was despite the perpetrator being an avowed Muslim carrying out the wishes of Allah and his prophet.

One can never be absolutely sure if the multi-millionaire anarchist and self proclaimed revolutionary is acting on orders of the government-media axis or just courting publicity in order to top up his already substantial bank balance.

On the subject of anarchists, John Lydon chipped in with the racist smear along with Johnson and Brand. Lydon, better known as Johnny Rotten, the snarling, spitting front man for the now defunct punk rock band the Sex Pistols.

They portrayed themselves as the ultimate anti-establishment group taking particular pleasure in insulting the Queen and the Royal Family while espousing mayhem and anarchy at the same time.

Its another sad fact that insulting behavior and causing public outrage attracts publicity and publicity attracts money.

As far as the government is concerned getting Rotten/Lydon to smear UKIP as racist will appeal to the gullible and lend credence to the image that diverse sections of the populace associate UKIP with racism. Its classic media management by a well organised, if shameless, media machine.

In conclusion I would add that it is understandable that a ruthless establishment figure like Boris Johnson, who is committed to the EU/Cultural Replacement agenda, will use the bought-and-paid-for-media to further his aims but publicity seeking celebrities are obviously prepared to sell out their supposed anti-establishment credentials for a few pieces of silver.

Political Enemies And The MSM Unite To Smear The Peoples Party As Racist

It came as no surprise that the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party, popularly known as UKIP, would shake the cosy consensus between the three old legacy parties, their bought and paid for media whores and the BBC, right through to its rotten core.

Never in my experience have I witnessed such a concerted effort by the established political class to insult, denigrate and smear a political party that polls less than ten percent of the popular vote in general elections.

This phenomenon not only raises some important issues with regard to the state of British democracy but it also highlights the yawning chasm between the cross party political class and the people they are supposedly representing.

The advent of the professional political class has been accompanied by the demise of democracy; this is particularly apparent by the fact that people enter politics nowadays, not as a public service or a sense of duty after a life long career in the real world, but straight from school as a lucrative, self serving pursuit of political power funded by the taxpayer.

It doesn't take an expert to notice that regardless of party affiliation they are all the same. They dress the same, they talk the same, they have the same mannerisms and they speak in a language dominated by centrally issued slogans and soundbites. They have all been trained in the black arts of media management, spin, deceit together with the ability to lie with a straight face.

They make false promises and lie without conscience to get themselves elected - they are bereft of any semblance of principle. Consequently it is no wonder that when a straight talking party enters the political fray, who accurately articulate the concerns of the people, they are attacked mercilessly by the united political order.

Short of throwing the kitchen sink at UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage, the political class and their media cronies have joined together out of mutual self interest to use every dirty trick in the book to discredit and smear the increasingly popular movement that promotes a return to national sovereignty, democracy and common sense by leaving that undemocratic disaster known as the European Union.

One of the things that becomes apparent by this concerted cross party smear campaign is the unwillingness of the party leaders to debate the issues - the reason being that they would lose, and lose humiliatingly, if judged by the debates between Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, and UKIP leader Nigel Farage.

If the other two party leaders, David Cameron and Red Ed Miliband are too cowardly to debate the leader of a minor political party, how in God's name can they stand up for the British people's interests against hardened political animals such as Russia's President Putin, China's Xi Jinping or Germany's Angela Merkel?

These two over promoted schoolkids would have difficulty extracting a minor concession from political pygmies of the Herman von Rumpuy/Jose Manuel Barrosso school of bureaucracy, let alone a political heavyweight.

They are unable to debate the issues therefore in the tradition of the new political class they resort to smear and there is no bigger smear at the moment in politically correct Great Britain than 'racist'. It must be the most over used word in the English language. It is thrown around at random on the flimsiest of excuses but unfortunately for the political class its over use is its downfall.

Its effectiveness is lessened the more its used, and in many circles it is becoming a badge of honour to be smeared as a racist by a member of the current political class. It's use as a smear to denigrate UKIP is having the opposite effect by galvanising support and its continued use merely reflects the fact that they have lost the debate on the issues.

The high profile defection of UKIP's so called rising star, Sanya-Jeet Thandi, has all the hallmarks of a set up, choreographed to cause maximum damage at a crucial point in the campaign.

The fact that this student from the radical left wing London School of Economics was openly advocating UKIP's immigration policy days before her defection, and then doing it via the ultra left wing Guardian newspaper, should dispel any doubt that this was choreographed. By her own logic, by promoting UKIP's long standing immigration policy she herself was a racist up until her defection.

There is no shortage of ambitious young ladies willing to volunteer for publicity generating scams such as this. I would suggest that Ms. Thandi has political aspirations and like others before her she is willing to indulge in a publicity generating controversy in order to raise her profile - and make some easy baksheesh in the process.

It was only recently that an obscure actress, Somi Guha was put up to suing Jeremy Clarkson and the BBC in blaze of publicity, in hope of resurrecting her failed acting career while making some easy money in the process. Indian national Ms. Guha was apparently offended by Clarkson's use of the word 'slope' which has no connotations with Indian people whatsoever. Obviously controversies generated by the word 'racist' can be very lucrative as well as career enhancing.

Nobody should be surprised if Ms. Thandi reappears in the not too distant future as an ethnic rising star in one of the established parties. Hopefully it will be with the Liberal Democrats where her treacherous career will be mercifully short.

The latest 'racist' controversy artificially generated by the established political order, ruthlessly executed by the media in order to smear UKIP and cause maximum damage, is the row over an Afghan community ignoring a planning ruling by a North London local authority, safe in the knowledge they will get away it.

Local UKIP candidate, Heino Vockradt gave his view on the issue, not in centrally issued slogans or soundbites but in a forthright language everyone can understand.

With reference to the Afghans ignoring the ruling which has resulted in non Muslims being squeezed out of a shopping street in his area, he correctly states that:

"Political correctness is preventing the council from taking action for fear of being called racist, when, just like in all other cases where Muslims are grooming children to be sex slaves under the eyes of the authorities, the council does nothing".

(He is refering to the local authorities in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and other cites in England who ignored Muslim paedophile gangs as they groomed under age white girls before subjecting them to horrific sexual abuse)

Echoing the experience of thousands of communities the length and breadth of the country, Vockradt states that:

"The neighbourhood was already exploding under the weight of segregation, shopkeepers are being squeezed out by Muslims. The entire parade - once lovely owner/occupier shops - resembles Helmand Province".

He went on to state state correctly, and echoing the words of Sir Winston Churchill highlighted in yesterdays post that:

"Islam is a mono-cultural, totalitarian ideology. It is not a religion. It is against multi-culturalism and only promotes its own culture. It is against everything modern Britain stands for".

Right on cue, the Labour leader of the council in question, Mohammed Butt, gave us a pearl of his wisdom using a dogeared, vintage soudbite from the Blair/ Mandelson era.

"In Brent we draw strength from our diversity and the vibrancy that it brings".

You really couldn't make this stuff up.

This kind of candid talk is forbidden in politically correct Britain for fear that the truth will resonate with the electorate, therefore the established political order stamp on it early through their dirty tricks department in order to shut down the debate. The weapon of choice of course is a smear using the word 'racist'.

What the political order fail to understand is that the people have learned by bitter experience the the comments made by the candidate are true, therefore they do resonate with the electorate and the 'racist' smear only hardens the support for UKIP.

In conclusion I will state that it is my fervent wish that support for UKIP holds up in the face of this unprecidented onslaught of dirty tricks and smear and that an electoral earthquake gives the political class a shock from which it will never recover.

Here a racist, there a racist, everywhere a racist racist. A great article from across the pond.