United Nations – Are Brexit Voting Brits More Racist Than Ever?

Why civilized nations continue to give credibility, along with billions of taxpayer dollars, to an organization that is flawed beyond repair and openly hostile to civilized nations defies logic. The United Nations has been taken over by an organized collection of third world dictators, communists, anti-Semites and anti-development globalists who harbor a hatred for the United States, Great Britain and Israel.

The latest imbecility emanating from this epicenter of globalist world government is to send a special envoy to Great Britain to report on racism, discrimination and exclusion since the British people voted to regain their independence and sovereignty from the corrupt European Union (EU).

Zambian-born, Zimbabwe raised American academic, Tendayi Achiume, the UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance follows on the heels of other bureaucrats sent to Great Britain to denigrate and insult its people.

UN advisor for Forced Evictions, Professor Yves Cabannes, claimed that a local authority in Essex, England had abused the human rights of four hundred travelers who were being evicted after illegally occupying private land.

Two years after this malicious political agitation, the UN sent a creature named Raquel Rolnick, their Housing rapporteur to lecture the British people on behalf of housing victims. The obviously demented Ms. Rolnick is a Brazilian academic and devotee of Karl Marx who went on to criticize the British housing benefits system while staying in a $420 a night hotel.

Ms. Rolnik was followed by South African feminist Rashida Mandoo, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women who, despite having a female Prime Minister and Head of State, concluded that Great Britain was a ‘boys club with a sexist culture'.

The campaign of insult and degradation continued with the recent arrival of yet another special rapporteur, Canadian Leilani Farha who claimed that Great Britain has a ‘troubling attitude’ to social housing.

What these UN special advisers and rapporteurs deliberately ignore is that Great Britain is a small island that has increased its population by eight million in the last twenty-five years, over two million in the last five years alone. Due to the governments' refusal to implement proper in/out checks at ports of entry and exit, these figures do not include one or possibly two million that have entered illegally and live below the radar.

These numbers are far more than can possibly be housed, educated and provided for by government and local social services.

More critical is that millions of these new arrivals are from the undeveloped world that have cultures and practices that are totally alien and who cannot or will not integrate or accept the traditions of the host nation.

By ignorance or design these UN special advisers and rapporteurs do not acknowledge that millions of these new colonist’s demand and agitate for the host people to alter their ancient traditions and way of life to accommodate them and their traditions.

The situation is made infinitely worse by the government and its agents refusing to act when the new colonists indulge in an orgy of violent crime, including robbery, rape and murder, on the grounds of ‘cultural sensitivity’.

Such is their determination to impose their agenda the government is resorting to tyranny by denying the British people their ancient right of free speech and by closing down any form protest or redress. The fact is that the government is stuffed full of compliant placemen and UN apparatchiks that believe in the UN’s globalist project and are determined to implement it no matter what the cost.

It is this forced transformation along with government resorting to despotism to impose it that is causing inter-communal friction, not racism, xenophobia, Islamophobia or any other label made up by UN bureaucrats and globalists to smear and denigrate the British people and those who disagree with their agenda.

In conclusion, it’s worth reminding the UN bureaucrats that despite the gloomy scenario they want to paint along with the insults and denigration aimed at the British people, the Westminster Parliament is the most diverse in history with an increase in representation of ethnic minorities, women, gays and those with disabilities.

There is a female Head of State, Prime Minister, and Leader of the House, there is a Muslim Home Secretary, a Muslim Mayor of London, etc. White British are a minority in four of Great Britain’s major towns and cities including London, the capital.

In the meantime, ignored by the UN special advisers and rapporteurs, in Southern Africa racism and xenophobic violence perpetrated by black people is running rampant. (See here)

Related articles:

UN sends envoy to Britain to probe whether Brexit made the country more racist.

Yves Cabannes is a poster-boy for the charade that is the UN

Achiume Named to UN post on racism and intolerance (Biography)

Winston Churchill Would Be Banned From Speaking In Today's America

When Berkley’s KPFA Radio cancelled an appearance by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins for ‘hurtful speech against Islam’ the United States joined Great Britain and the rest of Europe by censoring any remarks about the so-called religion of peace no matter how minor or truthful.

Apart from his work in the field of evolutionary science and other disciplines, Dawkins is more renowned for his atheism and his criticism of all religions particularly Christianity. He has had many high profile clashes with the Roman Catholic Church and uses language during his discourse which has offended and hurt billions of Christians around the world.

The fact that KPFA were prepared to host Mr. Dawkins regardless of his attacks on Christianity renders their claim that they do not endorse hurtful speech risible as well as grossly hypocritical. What they really mean is that they will ignore hurtful speech against Christianity but they will not countenance any criticism of Islam. (Read the story here)

This is in line with the rest of the main stream media (MSM) that is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the ruling elite who are intent on forcing acceptance of Islam in the western world using censorship and threats by labelling any criticism of Islam as hate speech.

Shamefully, this brings the United States into line with Great Britain and the rest Europe who have virtually banned any criticism of Islam and use so-called ‘hate crimes’ to intimidate people into silence. The highly politicized British police ‘service’ are using their supposedly scarce resources to monitor social media such as Twitter and Facebook looking for ‘Islamophobic’ comments to which they boast they have zero tolerance.

This is the same police 'service' that arrested the leader of the Liberty GB Party, Paul Weston, for quoting Sir Winston Churchill in a speech during his election campaign for the European Parliament. (See here)

The words used by Richard Dawkins which resulted in his censorship were mild by comparison to the observations made by Sir Winston Churchill in his book, “The River War” that resulted in Mr. Weston's arrest.

These were observations Churchill made from first-hand experience while serving as an officer in the British Army during the Boer War.

Who could deny the veracity of his words or the fact that they are as relevant today as they were back then.  

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

― Winston S. Churchill, The River War

This paragraph alone would result in Great Britain’s war time Prime Minister being labelled as an Islamophobe and banned not only from an insignificant radio station in Berkley but the entire MSM in the USA.

When then Prime Minister Churchill was invited in May 1946 by President Harry S. Truman to make a post war speech in Fulton, Missouri, he laid bare the intentions of Stalin and communist Russia at a time when negative talk about the wartime ally was all but forbidden.

His Sinews of Peace speech, better known as the Iron Curtain speech, correctly predicted the expansionist plans of Stalin in Europe and the resultant cold war. (Watch it here)

He was accused of war mongering and castigated for insulting a wartime ally who was instrumental in the defeat of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazi’s).

Churchill was right in his assessment of Stalin and his communist party just as he was right about the nature of Islam. Like Richard Dawkins, in modern politically correct America, the great man would most likely be censored if he was invited at all.

In conclusion, for the attention of Antifa and the rest of the George Soros sponsored cadres of socialist  juveniles, Sir Winston made his speech at Westminster College in Fulton Missouri. The site contains a relocated church that was bombed during the London Blitz and a superb Churchill museum marking the occasion of his speech. Outside stands an imposing statue of the great man which I am sure triggers many a snowflake as they pass by.

In line with your current behavior it is your duty to don your masks, tool up and knock the place down then convince yourself that Islam is a religion of peace and Winston Churchill was never there.  

T. May Acts Against ISIS - Welcomes Them Home For A Spot of Rehab

One has to wonder what goes on inside the heads of politicians especially those that laughably refer to themselves as ‘progressives’; they say and do the dumbest things that not only defy logic but pose a clear and present danger to the public they are supposed to be protecting.

Putting out the welcome mat for battle hardened jihadists returning from the killing fields of the Middle East and Africa as if they have been on vacation then thinking they will reform their murderous ways after a stint in a rehabilitation clinic is another classic example.

Barely two months ago on 4^th June after 28 were people murdered and almost 300 injured by Islamic terrorists in Manchester and Westminster, British Prime Minister, Theresa May, declared on the steps of 10 Downing Street that there has been “far too much tolerance of extremism” in the UK and added that “enough was enough”. (Watch and read her platitudes here)

In reality it was the political class and the establishment that had tolerated extremism for decades by allowing sharia controlled no-go ghetto areas to proliferate and fester across the country which not only allowed preachers of hate to regurgitate their hatred of the west but also acted as recruiting grounds for ISIS and other terrorist groups.

It was Mrs. May herself who declared that some British citizens would benefit greatly from sharia law.

The queen of the soundbites and slogans, Mrs. May’s ‘enough is enough’ is matched only in its paltering deceptiveness by her now infamous ‘Brexit means Brexit’, which as the British people know to their cost has been diluted to the point where it's Brexit in name only and kicked so far down the road its almost out of sight.

Mrs. May and her government have taken no action that matches her words except curbing the people’s  right to privacy by monitoring their Internet browsing and taking steps to combat so-called ‘far-right extremists’ which happens to be anyone that opposes the imposed Islamification of their country.

The politicized 'police service' have been ignoring the Muslim grooming gangs that have been raping under age white girls on an industrial scale but spend their time and resources monitoring Twitter and Facebook to search for so-called Islamophobic hate speech to which they laughably claim to have zero tolerance.

    

If the best the government can do is to allow these seasoned killers to return and send them to rehabilitation clinics then they are ignoring the reality of a potentially lethal situation for the British people.

As the battle against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) turns against them, the chances of the British and European jihadis dying an ignominious death in some flyblown desert dung heap are greatly increased; therefore they are using their western documentation to return to the country of issue.

It’s not that they fear death; it’s the ‘ignominious death in a dung heap’ they are scared of. They would much rather go out in a blaze of glory taking as many infidels with them as possible to guarantee martyrdom status and seventy-two virgins in paradise.

Since the leaders of ISIS along with other affiliated Islamic terrorist groups have announced their intention to repatriate their jihadis one would think that the political class would take note and put the safety and security of their citizens first by preventing their return.

According to the security services and military intelligence, anywhere between 300 and 500 jihadis have already returned 'home' to Great Britain, a further 3,000 potential terrorists are under investigation and a mind boggling 23,000 jihadis are living freely in Great Britain. (See here)

Using the powers at their disposal and revoking their citizenship thus preventing their return is way too easy and logical for these agenda driven ‘progressives’ and their fellow western culture hating disciples. Instead they use the human rights scam as the reason to allow them back into the country to maim and kill at a time of their choosing.

Only in the twisted mind of a ‘progressive’ can the rights of sub humans who have publicly tortured and horrifically murdered anyone who is not a follower of Islam be they men, women, old, young, black white be given a higher priority than law abiding citizens.These animals are beyond rehabilitation.

The jihadi returnees are also using the opportunity to encourage other Muslims to murder nonbelievers in the name of Islam.

The politicians refer to this radicalization as if the mind of a pure and benign moderate Muslim has been stolen and poisoned against the western world. The truth is that jihad is in their DNA, children are brainwashed from birth by their parents with the requirements of the Koran to convert, enslave or murder Jews and nonbelievers. 

They are already radicalized by the time they start attending the mosque to be exposed to the demented anti-western rantings of an imported preacher of hate or the local imam.

There have been no significant changes in policy toward militant Islam since 7^th July 2005 when fifty-two people were killed and over seven hundred injured after Muslim terrorists attacked the London Transport system.

Preachers of hate are still allowed into the country to rabble rouse unimpeded by the authorities. Sharia law is slowly being accepted and illegal female genital mutilation is still being performed with no prosecutions. 

Similarly, illegal child marriages are still performed with no repercussions; no-go Muslim ghettos are still allowed to proliferate and fester and battle hardened jihadis are being allowed to return with their religious zeal and blood lust intact. (See here)

No amount of rehabilitation is going to cure the hate and blood lust of these highly motivated seasoned killers and no amount of prison time is going to de-radicalize a born to kill jihadi.

It's not just Great Britain that's suffering from an overdose of  imbecility, things are just as crazy across the Atlantic where some genius in the United States has taken a leaf out of Great Britain's book of political stupidity and suggested a 'Hug a Jihadi' program to prevent radicalization as well as testing a post prison experiment to rehabilitate a Somali ISIS supporter.(See here and here)

Good luck with those two pieces of nonsense and if that's all the politicians can come up with to protect the law abiding public may the Lord have mercy on us all.

Associated articles:

UK:Still Welcoming Jihadis

Young British Muslims think Isis fighters returning from Syria should reintegrated into society

Islamic State fighters returning to UK 'pose huge challenge'.

                                                     

     

Trump Hatred - British Political Hypocrites Vent Their Phony Anger

The anti-Trump hysteria that is currently sweeping across the world is an indication that the newly elected President of the United States has set about reversing the ‘fundamental transformation’ of America embarked upon by the Obama administration from the greatest and most prosperous nation on earth into a mediocre third world  backwater.

This regressive ‘fundamental transformation’ was an integral part of the UN/EU globalist post war plan to create a borderless, egalitarian one world which President Trump has vowed to destroy by putting the interests of the American people first.

It’s also a clear demonstration of the awesome power that the UN/EU globalists can unleash when their progress toward a borderless, egalitarian one world government is threatened. The media machine at their disposal has whipped up such hatred and hysteria across the planet riots have broken out in American cities and cities across the world against President Trump.

 What should worry freedom lovers everywhere is that this hysteria is being deliberately whipped up using censorship, distortion and outright lies and this is leading to a breakdown of civil order, rioting and urban violence.

One would expect politicians, especially those from the Mother of Parliaments to show a modicum of honor with regard to the truth and disavow this deliberate stoking of hatred using distortion and lies.

Looking at the Parliamentary rabble that is most vocal in the anti-Trump hate campaign it is clearly apparent that their sole reason for living is to impose their ideologically driven agenda on the country therefore the truth is treated as an enemy to be defeated.

The visceral hatred for America and its capitalist system, albeit somewhat degraded, and the dream of its demise lies at the heart of every socialist/communist/liberal and in their malignant minds justifies the use of censorship, distortion and lies.

The British Parliament lost its reputation as the Mother of Parliaments long ago when elected office became a well remunerated career financed by the taxpayer as opposed to a public duty. The latest anti-American rant by the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons is a clear indication of how low this venerable institution has sunk.

The House of Commons is infested with hundreds of self-loathing, capitalist hating, socialist hypocrites who despise America and its dedication to individual liberty and constitutionally limited government; to illustrate the point I will highlight two of the most odious.

Harriet Harman, a vocal man hating feminist has been a Member of Parliament  since 1982, has vowed to empty chair President Trump should he visit stating that she “could not be there clapping a man who is a self-confessed groper”.

Firstly, a bit of locker room banter uttered in jest over decade or so ago doesn’t make President Trump a serial groper.

Secondly, in a nauseating display of monumental hypocrisy Harman may not be prepared to clap a mythical self-confessed groper but she is more than happy to clap former President Bill Clinton who is not just a self-confessed groper but a self-confessed sex pest, a serial abuser of women and a rapist when he addressed Parliament.

She also has nothing to say about former French Presidents Francois Mitterrand or Nicholas Sarkozy, one a bigamist and the other a serial womanizer who abused his wife, both of whom also addressed the Mother of Parliaments during her tenure.

More disgustingly, the not so pure and wholesome Harman was associated with the Pedophile Information Exchange, a vile organization that campaigned for sex between children and adults to be legalized.

Yvette Cooper, a former government Minister who entered Parliament in 1997, is another social hypocrite who uses distortion and lies to smear and delegitimize President Trump.

According to Cooper, “a Trump speech would fly in face of what Labour has worked for”. Since President Trump has not made a speech yet, and the world could be an entirely different place in the near future, she has no idea what it would contain. This statement is deliberately provocative as well as being evidence of Cooper’s hidden powers of clairvoyance.

Cooper is deliberately stirring up anti-Trump hatred using distortion and lies when she adds that “the idea that we are all going to sit in Parliament and listen to a man that is turning the clock back on democracy, pushing misogyny and hatred of Muslim is a joke”.

This statement is the work of a professional politician skilled in the dark arts of subliminal messaging and propaganda.

By using the word “we” she is giving the impression that she speaks for the entire six hundred and fifty Members of Parliament who are unanimous in their disapproval of President Trump. This is patently not true.

She offers no evidence or examples where President Trump is “turning back the clock on democracy”, this statement is designed to imply that he is anti-democracy and therefore the ludicrous charge of Fascist is justified.

It beggars belief that Cooper wants to be taken seriously when she claims that President Trump is “pushing misogyny and hatred of Muslims” when abuse of women is an integral part of Islam and misogyny is practiced by Muslim men in Great Britain without let or hindrance by politicians including herself and her ultra-feminist colleague, Harriet Harman.

Cooper and Harman know full well that female genital mutilation, child brides, incest, pedophilia, spousal abuse and so-called ‘honor killings’ are rife in Great Britain and since action to stamp them out is not forthcoming because of political correctness and their agenda to impose ‘multi-culturalism, it is safe to assume that they tacitly approve.

Students of the modern political class will know immediately that the statement was deliberately designed to stir up hatred in the Muslim communities by labelling President Trump as a racist and Islamophobe.

In conclusion: Harman and Cooper are only two of the hundreds of globalists in Parliament who have witnessed their ‘progressive’ agenda slowly disappear with the election of Donald Trump and the vote by the British people to regain their sovereignty and become an independent nation once again.

This Trump hatred hysteria is not an isolated response to a proposed visit by an unpopular American President. These people are fanatics who will not accept Brexit or the Trump Presidency; they will fight with everything at their disposal for the ideology that dominates their lives. These insults, lies and smears will only get worse as their beloved project disappears further into the dustbin of history with every passing day.

     

Orlando Jihad - It's Nothing To Do with Islam Pt II - It's Homophobia

It's not just in the United States that the socialist/communist/liberal community cynically used the Orlando massacre to advance their own agenda.

Across the Atlantic in Great Britain a similar left-wing callousness exists in the form of media diva Owen Jones, who for some unknown reason gets plenty of air time to enlighten us about the blessings of socialism and to advance his personal LGBT agenda.

His petulant outburst on a Sky TV discussion about the Orlando massacre ended with him storming off the set simply because the other participants didn't acknowledge that the Islamic jihadi massacre in Orlando was motivated by so-called homophobia. (See here)

For those unfamiliar with Owen Jones, he is an archetypal socialist who's indoctrination from birth has driven out any cranial facility he may have had to understand that there are legitimate opinions that are contrary to his own. The fact that Jones maintains an unshakable belief in his socialist ideology even when presented with irrefutable facts and evidence of its failure proves beyond doubt his mental and emotional incapacity.

Like all members of the socialist/communist/liberal community Jones's indoctrination means that he holds deeply held principles solely because that's what's been drummed into his head as the absolute truth.

Anyone who has had the unenviable misfortune of debating with a lefty will know that it's a pointless exercise that they can never win. Socialists like Jones cannot accept anything outside of their rigid mindset; they believe that their beliefs and principles are morally superior to everyone else's which the rest of the world will eventually adopt by mysterious process of historical inevitability.

When their ideology is exposed as the cause of poverty, misery and bloodshed across the planet using facts and irrefutable examples, they resort to labeling, smears and storming out of the studio in order to deflect the truth and close down the debate.

Like all other indoctrinated socialists, Jones accepts the tenets of his religion without question, even if it contradicts reality or basic logic. The tenet that applies in this case is that any criticism of homosexuals, the LGBT community or their aggressive agenda to continue portraying themselves as victims of bigotry must be dismissed as homophobia.

When radical Muslims attacked and killed eighty-nine innocent people attending a rock concert at the Bataclan theatre in Paris, it was universally accepted, including by Owen Jones, that they did it in the name of Allah, as commanded by their prophet Mohammad and as written in their holy book the Koran, as part of their jihad against civilization.

Likewise the massacres in San Bernadino, Chattanooga, Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon and New York on 9/11, to name but a few.

When a radical Muslim murders forty-nine innocent party goers at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, we must all accept that the prime motivation was not Islamic jihad but homophobia or else Owen Jones will have a hissy fit and storm out of a discussion.  

Watching the behavior of militant homosexuals and listening to their continuing whining, it's obvious that the biggest thing in their lives is not their achievements but the fact that they are homosexual and consequently perpetual victims of a homophobic society.

If the truth be known, the majority of people couldn't care less about who Owen Jones, or any other homosexual goes to bed with, but their constant aggressive demands that the their sexual proclivities be given a high profile and exposed to pre-pubescent children puts people off and does their cause no good whatsoever.

In conclusion it must be noted that like all brainwashed socialists, Jones accepts the tenets of his religion without question or understanding of what the repercussions of his fanaticism could be.

He uses his high profile to campaign with Muslims against perceived Islamophobia obviously ignorant of the fact that the vast majority of Muslims in the world would throw him off a tall building and stone his body to pulp if it shows any signs of life after the fall.

Jones is also ignorant of the fact that if he travels to Tehran to show solidarity with his fellow homosexuals he would be strung up by a crane in the city centre. He would be met with a similar fate in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Libya, Syria and all the other hell holes on the planet the citizens of which Jones would allow unvetted into western countries to continue their jihad.
.
 
Update: This was written prior to the murder of  British Member of Parliament by a man with a history of mental illness. Indications are that this tragedy is already being used by the socialist/communist/liberal community for political purposes to further their agenda. If this turns out to be true then politicians and the media have reached a new low and the future of political discourse will turn in an ugly direction.

Politician Admits He Got It Wrong On Islam - Well Thats OK Then

The admission by Sir Trevor Phillips, the former Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), that he got it wrong about the compatibility of Islam and British society should not be accepted as a mea culpa since the consequences of his so-called mistake were deadly serious. The truth is that Phillips played his part in the deliberate foisting of Islam on the British people with the dedication and skill worthy of any other politician dedicated to a long planned agenda.

Trevor Phillips is supposedly and intelligent man, grammar school educated with a BSc degree from Imperial College, London and yet he was not smart enough look at the horrors of contemporary Islamic societies around the world and it's 1,400 year history of violence and conquest and come to the obvious conclusion that Islam is not compatible with modern, western societies.

The incompatibility and backwardness of Muslims and Islam has been written about for centuries including by Britain's greatest Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill who observed back in 1899 and noted in his book The River War:

 "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. 

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome".

Anyone unfamiliar with this quote will note the parallels between Islam and Muslims of Churchill's day with those of today but somehow Sir Trevor Phillips missed it and proceeded to give cultural and moral equivalence to an obviously backward cult.

Under his politically correct regime at the EHRC and the agenda driven political elite, quoting from The River War in public will lead to arrest by the politicized 'police service'  for religious and racial harassment. (See here)

Maybe Phillips should have listened to our new friend and ally Recep Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey and take his word for it when he states that "The term 'moderate Islam' is ugly and offensive. There is no 'moderate Islam'. Islam is Islam".

Ignoring the fact that the British people were never consulted, let alone consented to the replacement of their ancient culture with a so-called 'multi-cultural society', Phillips laid the blame for the segregation of Muslims on the British people themselves. It was Phillips who invented the crime of 'Islamophobia' which was used as a tool to smear and demonize anyone who questioned the policy of third world Muslim immigration.

Now he is admitting what everyone else has known for generations - that "Muslims are not like us and we should accept that they will never integrate".

(See here)

The current political elite are fighting a rearguard action against the onset reality and persisting with the narrative that sharia controlled Muslim ghettos don't exist and in the words of Great Britain's thoroughly discredited Prime Minister, David Cameron, that  "Britain is one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-faith, multi-ethnic countries in the world".

These revelations by Sir Trevor Phillips have blown that nonsense out of the water and confirmed what smeared people knew all along.  Unfortunately that won't stop Cameron and his EU masters, led by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, sticking to their 'global religion of peace' narrative and absolving Muslims of blame for their orgy of rape and pillage across Europe with their "nothing to do with Islam" mantra.

Why Sir Trevor Phillips is coming out with the truth at this point in history is not immediately apparent but he must take responsibility for his part in the misery that has been caused to the many victims of the medieval practices that have been forced upon the British people by his organization and the government.

Phillips is nothing other than an apologist for Islam and those who follow this backward cult. Consequently, because of his complicity, tens of thousands of young underage white girls have been groomed, subjected to horrific sexual abuse, rape and sex slavery by Muslim men with the knowledge of his organization.

Because of his complicity thousands of young girls are being subjected to female genital mutilation (FMG), also stripped of their basic human rights thousands of Muslim women are being routinely abused by their spouses.

In addition to these horrific practices, child marriage, polygamy, honour killings, sharia law and beheading are now familiar words in the daily lexicon of British life.

Thanks in part to Sir Trevor, the proliferation of welfare financed, sharia controlled Muslim ghettos are hotbeds of radical Islam and a recruiting ground for ISIS and Al Shabaab terrorists who are waging jihad abroad and in the not too distant future will be waging it at home.

Despite being only some 3 million strong the other 61 million British citizens are being forced to accept medieval practices and to accede to every demand made by this most indulged minority.

Halal meat is being made compulsory in public sector workplaces including schools while popular pork products are being banned. School curricula, examinations and holidays are being altered to fit in with Muslim holidays and festivals while British holidays and festivals are being downgraded for fear of causing offence.

As mentioned earlier, thanks to Sir Trevor and his invented crime, anyone who utters opposition to any of this agenda is smeared as an Islamophobe and liable to prosecution for racial or religious harassment.

In conclusion, it's worth adding that if any mortal plebeian from the lower orders admitted a mistake of this magnitude that had caused such misery and destruction they wouldn't be rewarded with a TV documentary program but a prison sentence.

It's my view that Sir Trevor Phillips should be stripped of his Knighthood, drummed out of public life and live out his days in one of the Muslim ghettos he himself was instrumental in creating.

Video demonstrating the compatibility of London Muslims here


 

Obama Mosque Visit - Fighting The Good Fight, Keeping The Faith

Listening to the speech given by President Obama during his first visit to a mosque on American soil, one would be forgiven for thinking that he either genuinely believes what he is saying or he is indulging in a cynical campaign of historical revisionism in order to present the world's most indulged special interest group with a more benign image for 'fundamental transformation' purposes.

It could also be true what has been suspected since his appearance on the political stage; that his exposure to Islam during his formative years growing up in Indonesia has made him a sympathiser if not an actual adherent of this medieval so called religion.

His written and spoken word consistently extolling the virtues of Islam - while also being quick to absolve its adherents from guilt for the murder and mayhem they are visiting upon the planet - certainly lends credence to this point of view. In all probability it's a combination of all three.

It makes it difficult to come to any other conclusion when the President expresses the sentiment that he "will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" or when he unashamedly proclaims before the entire world that "the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam".

Obama's proclamation on who the future must not belong to was delivered at the UN and is aimed exclusively at non Muslims; therefore it is safe to assume that in his opinion the future must belong to those who slander and murder the followers of the Christian Messiah and the Jews and who's prophet, Mohammad - No Slander Upon Him (NSUH) - orders their enslavement or beheading.

Looking at current world events it's an order that is carried out with ruthless dedication by millions of the Muslim faithful worldwide.

Judging by his speech President Obama must also be assuming that the audiences outside of the mosque are blissfully unaware of the rape, death and destruction being wreaked upon Christians, Jews and other infidels by Muslims across the planet from the Philippines in the east to Nigeria in the west, not to mention inside the United States itself.

It must be noted at this point that Muslims have been relentlessly wreaking death and destruction on each other in an internecine bloodbath since their prophet Mohammad's (NSUH) death in the year 632 AD over whether his father-in-law or his son-in-law was his rightful successor.

As with every action and utterance by the UN/EU controlled political order in the USA and Europe, President Obama's visit to a mosque was the result of a political calculation and was meticulously choreographed to further advance the 'fundamental transformation' agenda.

By analysing the actions and rhetoric of the ruling political order in both America and Europe it becomes abundantly clear that Islam and it's adherents are being used as a battering ram for the ongoing generational project to re-order the post war world. This consists of ending the global leadership of white Europeans of a Judeo-Christian heritage and their diaspora despite the fact that it is their leadership that is responsible for the advances of civilisation which has benefited mankind.

The President's conciliatory speech was an echo of the speeches given by the various Presidents and Prime Ministers of Europe with regards to the portrayal of Islam as a 'great global religion of peace' which is morally and religiously equivalent to Christianity. At the same time the mantra that "it's nothing to do with Islam" absolves their Muslim clients from their blood soaked murderous rampage across the planet which they carry out in the name of Allah, as demanded by their prophet Mohammad (NSUH) and as written in their holy book, the Koran.

The British Foreign Secretary, Theresa May, was quick to assert that the Muslim slaughter of the innocents in Paris was "nothing to do with Islam" but even that pales into insignificance compared to the ignominious apologist rant of Mayor Jim Kenny of Philadelphia after the attempted assassination of a police officer in one of his precincts.

Despite the perpetrator dressing in a traditional jihadi robe and quoting the Koran, and admitting on tape that he attempted to murder Officer Jesse Hartnell in the name of Allah on behalf of ISIS because the officer enforced a law that was not shariah, Mayor Kenny obediently ranted that it was 'nothing to do with Islam or the teachings of Islam'. 

He outdid his own imbecility when he added after the police confirmed that it was everything to do with Islam; "That is abhorrent. It's just terrible and it does not represent the religion in any way shape or form or any of it's teachings".  See the unedifying spectacle here.

Rewriting history is a vital part of the 'fundamental transformation' project and it is being progressed by President Obama with his continuing efforts to redefine American values and who they are as a people.  This has been taken to ever more risible lengths with his assertion that Islam 'is woven into the very fabric of American society and it's founding' having been introduced by African slaves.

Nonsense of course since no Muslims were ever involved with the Founding Fathers or the framing of the Republic's founding documents or the establishment of the Constitution after independence from Great Britain.

Despite the efforts of domestic enemies to prove otherwise and erase Christianity from the land, one only has to glance around to note that the United States of America remains a country founded on Judeo-Christian principles.  It was these principles that provided the moral compass that helped make the American people the most prosperous, generous and free people on earth.

The truth is that less than 10% of African slaves were Muslims, the majority being adherents of local tribal customs including shamanism. Slave descendants today are overwhelmingly Christian with many of their leaders bearing the title 'Reverend' even though their attitude to white people leaves a lot to be desired.

Domestic Islam is confined to a minority of racist bigots, many of them converts, such as the Nation of Islam and its vile leader Louis Farrakhan. More dangerous is the influx of Muslims from the developing world many of whom have been radicalised from birth. Radicalisation includes a visceral hatred for traditional America along with its people, its values and its way of life preferring instead to live under the medieval barbarism of sharia law.

The ominous part of the President's speech which should fill every freedom loving American with foreboding was the insinuation that 'hateful rhetoric' and 'bigotry' is rife among non Muslims which continues the theme that Muslims are victims as opposed to the perpetrators of hateful rhetoric, hate crimes and outright murder.

This is a precursor to Obama banning any criticism of Islam, a blatant attack on the 1st Amendment, and which is already being planned by the UN/EU for incorporation into international law.
(UN Resolution 16/18 here)

Muslim rape and sexual assaults are already censored in many European countries including Sweden and Germany. (See censorship story here)

This kind of historical revisionism has simultaneously been adopted by European leaders including Great Britain's David Cameron and Germany's Angela Merkel providing proof, if any were needed, that there is a concerted effort organised by the UN/EU elite to impose Islam onto white European, Judeo-Christian civilisations with a view to eroding their power and influence to zero.

While Cameron and Merkel are doing this because they have sworn fealty to the UN/EU and their agenda to re-order the post war planet, Barack Obama appears to be doing it to fight the good fight for Islam and to keep the faith as well.

Political Class Insult A Fallen Hero To Protect Their Political Agenda

With spin and obfuscation being the normal medium of communication during election time, anyone who listens to political discourse with any regularity will be hard pressed to understand what exactly the politicians have in store for we the people. Pre-election promises evaporate into thin air as soon as the votes are counted while the politicians carry on where they left off before the campaign.

For the short term, the usual diet of false promises and bribery can be taken for granted but it takes more detailed observation to understand their intentions for the longer term. In fact the political class go to extraordinary lengths to keep their true intentions away from the people for fear of an electoral backlash.

History has taught us to our cost that long term agendas can take a decade or more to fully implement and in the case of the federal European State, several generations. (In the case of the USA, fundamental transformation from free enterprise prosperity to third world socialist mediocrity is into its seventh year)

It is unlikely that Great Britain would be in the appalling state it's in today if during his election campaign candidate Tony Blair had declared his intention to alter the demographic and cultural balance of the country using open border mass immigration; nor did he declare his intention to move the economy away from individual prosperity and self reliance to one of taxpayer funded government dependency using extended welfare entitlements.

He wouldn't have stood a cat in hell's chance had he been honest with the people and declared his intention to increase taxes and impose a further one hundred new taxes to finance his dependent client groups and new voter base.

One has to look closely and analyse every word and action to get at the truth of what their long term agenda is and it's sad to say that the majority of prospective voters don't have the patience for such scrutiny. Instead they rely on the mainstream media for guidance which, as we know, is controlled by the political establishment and the party spin machines.

Governments of all colours, along with the establishment, vehemently deny that they are using Islam and its adherents as the weapon of choice to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society', however their words and actions demonstrate their absolute determination to see this transformation through to its conclusion.

Islam and its adherents are above reproach and it is clear that there is no depth to which the political class will not plummet in order to protect their cultural and religious cannon fodder and by extension, their 'multi-cultural' agenda.


In 1975, twenty two year old police officer Stephen Tibble, was fatally shot while apprehending an Irish terrorist on a London street. A memorial was unveiled at the location in honour of his sacrifice.

In 1984, twenty six year old police officer Yvonne Fletcher was fatally shot while policing a demonstration by anti-Gaddafi's dissidents outside the Libyan Embassy in London. A memorial was unveiled at the location in honour of her sacrifice.



In 1993, nineteen year old black teenager Stephen Lawrence was murdered on a London street in a racist attack. Due to the racial element this particular murder was seized upon by the political class to accuse the police, and by inference British society as whole, as institutionally racist. This was also seized upon by the self loathing community who turned the tragic death of a teenager into a celebrity cause. Stephen got two memorials and his mother was made a Peer Of The Realm entitled to sit in the House of Lords.

Memorials were unveiled for murdered politician Airey Neave and those killed in the assassination attempt on Margaret Thatcher in Brighton 1984. Both crimes were committed by Irish terrorists.

In 2013, twenty five year old British soldier Lee Rigby was brutally murdered by Muslim terrorists on a London street in broad daylight. Despite public demand no memorial will be unveiled in honour of his sacrifice. Despite attempts by the political class to bury this decision with weasel words and excuses, it turns out that the real reason is for fear of offending Muslims.

This appalling decision must be coupled with the recent announcement that actions against the Muslim population in Great Britain will be treated as a hate crime + 1, an extra bad hate crime. This can be put down to shameless trolling for the Muslim vote, but the continual grovelling appeasement of the Muslim population, which includes hate preachers, ISIS supporters and prospective jihadis, will not be found in any election campaign manifesto. Any questions about it will be greeted with the usual smears including the standard insults of racist, bigot and Islamophobe.

The political class and the establishment will not be enlightening the people during this election campaign as to what their long term agenda for the country is. Missing from any manifesto or election material will be anything relating to their true agenda of imposed multi-culturalism, cultural and religious relativity or taxpayer funded government dependency for their imported welfare colonists.

There is no craven act they will not commit nor any depth to which they will not sink in order to impose their political agenda and that includes insulting the memory of a hero murdered on the streets of the capital city of a once great country.

 

Christianity Portrayed As Bunkum - Questioning Islam Is A Hate Crime

Accusations of exaggeration and hyperbole are the standard reaction of the 'progressive' global elite, whenever it is suggested that there is a deliberate campaign to denigrate Christianity as a precursor to its elimination from the western world. At the other end of the religious spectrum, even the mildest questioning of Islam is rapidly accompanied by accusations of Islamophobia at the very least, with threats of prosecution for hate crimes or racial hatred at worst.

One doesn't have to engage in hours of research to prove the veracity of this phenomenon as a glance at the television schedules and the film industry are all that is required.

Just looking at the programme headlines should be enough to convince any sceptics that there is a concerted effort to question and denigrate the very foundations of Christianity and, by extension, western civilisation.

The History Channel alone has aired documentaries such as:

Bible Mysteries Explained - This series concluded that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was caused by a meteor storm, the collapse of the walls of Jericho was caused by an earthquake, the parting of the Red Sea was an unusual wind blowing on a unique underwater topography, the Star of Bethlehem was a comet, the Burning Bush was an atmospheric quirk and so on and so forth.

The Real Jesus - This questions the accuracy of the Gospels' with reference to Jesus being the Messiah or the Son of God

The Forbidden Scriptures - This programme suggests that there are Gospels missing from the Bible and that those that are included may have censored.

Lost In Translation - This programme suggests that the Bible has been mis-translated, selectively edited and censored and therefore compromised as the basis of Christianity.
(Documentaries info here)

It should also be noted that there always seem to be programmes questioning the basis of Christian festivals:

Programmes about the truth of the Virgin Birth, the census that took the Holy Family to Bethlehem, the birth of Jesus in a stable, the existence of the three Wise Men etc. always seems to appear around Christmas time.

Programmes suggesting that Jesus really didn't die on the cross but was substituted, together with questions about the Resurrection, the existence of Pontius Pilate or the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin usually appear around Easter time.

More recently there have been science programmes aired about the universe that suggest that, in addition to the the Big Bang, water came from the tails of comets and that the earth was seeded with life brought from outer space by comets.

Taking all these programmes together one can only come away with the intended message - there is no Christian God and the Christian faith is a load of complete and utter b*ollocks.

The film industry has had a field day where Christianity is concerned. Efforts to faithfully tell the Biblical story such as Jesus of Nazareth, The Greatest Story Ever Told etc. are accompanied by downright offensive and blasphemous films such as The Last Temptation of Christ and The Life of Brian.

More recently there's been The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons which challenge the basis of Christianity and the Catholic Church.

It is only right and proper that global religions which guide the lives and behavior of millions of adherents are subjected to detailed scrutiny.  Therefore one is entitled to ask why Islam is not being subjected to the same level of scrutiny.

Whenever there is any form of investigation into Islam it is either mild by comparison with Christian scrutiny and, more often than not, accompanied by violence and blood curdling threats.

The History Channel produced a documentary entitled Inside Islam which is woefully inadequate and which doesn't subject Islam to anything like the scrutiny it gives to Christianity. In fact it goes the other way with one reviewer quoted as as saying that it "explores the historic and poetic wellspring of the Muslim people".

The reviewer, Tom Keogh, goes on to say that  "it was Gabriel in fact who transmitted the Word of God to the 40 year old, seemingly ordinary Mohammad in the 7th century, making him extraordinary to millions today. Sure, anti-Western sentiment creeps into the story, but in every important way, 'Inside Islam' is an antidote to gross anti Muslim bigotry".

 
Anti Muslim bigotry indeed. Not only is Mr Keogh failing to question the historical accuracy of Gabriel transmitting the word of God to Mohammad but he is also ignoring the violent history of Islam and the news bulletins emanating from the Middle East.

There is no Koran Mysteries Explained questioning whether Mohammad actually did  ride to Jerusalem on a white steed and climb to Heaven up a sliver ladder.

Unlike for Jesus, there is no The Real Mohammad documentary to examine whether he really was a prophet, there is no investigation into his blood lust or his paedophilia.

Unlike for the Bible, there is no The Forbidden Koran to check if anything has been omitted or censored.

Unlike for the Bible, there is no Lost In Translation to check for mis-translation or selective editing of the Koran.

There are no television programmes around Ramadan or Eid about the supposed flight of Mohammad from Mecca to Medina. Neither are there television programmes around Haj time questioning the truth about Hagar and Ismael and the discovery of fountain of Zam Zam.

There has been no archaeological exploration of Medina to confirm that the tomb inside the green mosque is actually that of Mohammad or of Mecca to prove that the site was once visited by Adam or Abraham as claimed.
(Inside Islam story here)

When all this is added together the resultant conclusion is that the Christian God doesn't exist Jesus was just another historical man but the Muslim Allah is alive and well and Mohammad is most definately is his prophet.

Any attempt to scrutinise Islam in the way Christianity and other religions are, is met with threats, violence and blood shed.

Channel 4's documentary about the history of Islam had to be cancelled because of death threats to the writer and presenter. The Danish cartoons resulted in rioting and bloodshed across the world, the rape and murder of the American Ambassador to Libya, together with three of his colleagues, was blamed on a third rate video about the life of Mohammad.
(Channel 4 story here)

The fact that western governments continue to indulge Muslims and punish their critics is proof of their determination to impose multi-culturalism on people who are vehemently opposed to this 'religion' and who are revolted by its barbaric practices.

In their own countries Christians are being persecuted in the workplace for wearing only tiny symbols of their faith while there are no similar restrictions for Muslims, some of who are excused duty for anything that brings them into minor contact with pork products or alcohol.
(American flag a threat to the Muslim community? See here)

Christian festivals are being downgraded or their celebrations abandoned altogether while Muslim  festivals are being upgraded and given official sanction. Children are being bombarded with Muslim propaganda in their schools for reasons of 'cultural enrichment' while being forced to 'celebarte diversity' often against the wishes of their parents.

Some of the more barbaric practices of Islam are not taught in schools for obvious reasons nor are they included in the 'cultural enrichment' propaganda.

As Muslim jihadis behead their way across Syria and Iraq, as Muslim men rape their way across Sweden, Belgium and the other European countries, as Muslim men groom and gang rape under age white girls in cities across England, as Boko Haram kidnap hundreds of young girls in Nigeria for sex slavery and as young men, born and bred in Great Britain, flock to join violent uprisings across the world, the British government still insists on calling Islam the religion of peace.

The political class and its Common Purpose trained technocrats in the politicised institutions, together with their attendant armies of petty bureaucrats, are still installing Islam into the mainstream of British life giving it moral equivalence with other religions. As part of this agenda they are harassing and persecuting anyone who raises the slightest objection or exhibits any patriotic sentiment for Great Britain or England.

It goes without saying that the 'progressive' elite are using Islam as part of their cultural replacement agenda and their general downgrading of western civilisation.

The British and other western governments are ignoring the overwhelming evidence that Islam is a barbaric, blood soaked, murderous cult that has made no contribution to civilisation whatsoever and they are continuing to impose it on an unwilling people who don't want it, didn't ask for it and weren't consulted.

Update: In a story close to home, it has transpired that two supposedly ordinary young boys from Cardiff have disappeared only to reappear in Syria fighting for ISIS or to give it it's full name, The Islamic State In Iraq and Syria. This is a particularly blood thirsty army who's brutality is proving too much even for battle hardened Al Qaeda operatives.

Stories of their brutality abound which includes beheading, rape, dismemberment, crucifixion and mass murder of entire villages. All this barbarism is put on social media such as Facebook and Twitter for all the world to see.
(Barbarism in action here)

Being born some twenty three miles from my own village in South Wales, it is worth examining how myself and these two savages have evolved into totally different people with totally different values.

I was born and brought up in abject poverty but still taught to be polite and well mannered with a distinct knowledge of right and wrong. These values were instilled in me by a combination of parents, teachers and Sunday School Superintendents all working together to ensure I would become a law abiding, productive member of society.

'My fellow Welshmen' Nasser Mutharna and his brother Aseel enjoyed a typical middle class upbringing, they attended a Catholic school and by all accounts were ambitious, with the elder brother hoping to be the first Asian Prime Minister.

A clue to their subsequent taking of the murderous path to Muslim jihad is the admission by their father that he brought them up to be a mixture of British and Yemeni. They were born in Wales had a Welsh education and he wanted them to adopt British standards. However he took them to the mosque to learn Arabic, they ate Yemeni food except Sundays when they ate roast beef. They wore Yemeni clothes on special occasions and western clothes at other times.

Despite having an English grandfather with three English and one Irish great grand parents, I had no such clash of cultures to contend with because I was integrated. I have no urge to behead anyone who doesn't adopt Christianity, or who makes documentaries questioning the Christian faith. I don't want a fatwa declared on blasphemous film makers and don't want the Monty Python team beheaded because they made The Life of Brian.

If any proof were needed that multi-culturalism doesn't work and Islam is a blood thirsty death cult then these Welsh born jihadis are it. They were not radicalised by imams, their blood lust is inbred and if these two brothers can turn into barbaric blood thirsty sub humans then so can every Muslim in Great Britain.

The government and the multi-culturalists have created a monster that will have to be confronted sooner or later. When these battle hardened killers use their British passports to return to the land of their birth they will not be picking up their lives where they left off nor will they be integrating. They will bring their jihad and their cause back with them and use their newly acquired battle skills to foment violent revolution in Great Britain.

The Muslim population in Cardiff alone has doubled in ten years to twenty five thousand.  If only a quarter of these take up jihad there will be six and a quarter thousand people in Cardiff alone killing for the caliphate.

Extrapolating these figures to the country as a whole gives some idea of the potential disaster that British people are facing solely because the agenda driven political class and the multi-culturalists refused to listen.

(Read the full shocking story here)

From the comments - NHS punishment squad harrasses a Christian on behalf of a Muslim. See here.

Baroness Warsi Accuses Critics of Islam As Being Un-British

If there is one thing that winds up the British people more than stale beer, its migrants coming into their country to take advantage of its freedoms then continually whinging and whining about their hosts and their perceived shortcomings.

Chief among these ungrateful carpetbaggers is East African Muslim and the BBC's favourite 'progressive' Yasmin Alibai-Brown. (YA-B)

Many believe that this irritant makes a comfortable living out of deliberately antagonising the British people with her views on them and their values but unfortunately she actually believes the nonsense that she spouts.

She passes herself off as a Ugandan Asian which leads one to believe that she is a victim of Idi Amin's expulsion but this is false. YA-B came to Great Britain as an economic migrant prior to Amin's descent into insanity.

YA-B's route to riches is to portray herself as a victim and the British people as intransigent bigots because they continue to live their lives as they did before her arrival and who refuse to change their way of life to accommodate her.

I have spoken to many people about YA-B and the sentiment is always the same i.e. if the country and its people are not to your liking, why don't you just leave.

* ( I have re-worded the above statement as the actual wording is not suitable for a family blog)

If YA-B and her whining isn't bad enough, the British people now have to put up with token Muslim woman and Cabinet Minister Baroness Warsi, spouting the same divisive nonsense.

In a recent article she cites a YouGov poll which found that just 24% of voters think Islam is compatible with being British and only 23% say Islam is not a threat to Western civilisation.

Baroness Warsi's response is typical of the modern 'progressive' politician and that is to smear anyone who disagrees with her point of view.

In this case the noble Baroness has accused 76% of the British people of being un-British. She goes on to condemn critics of Islam for "peddling hate".

The Baroness has previous form when it comes to insulting the British people in the name of Islam.

In an offensive speech two years ago she ranted that "Britain's approach to Muslims has made Islamophobia acceptable at middle class dinner parties".

Before proceeding any further it's worth taking a look back to remind ourselves who the noble  Baroness is.

Warsi was born in Dewsbury in the county of West Yorkshire, England of Pakistani economic migrants. As a result of this good fortune she was able to enjoy housing, education and healthcare free of charge and financed by the 'Islamophobic' British people she sees fit to insult.

The Baroness went on to become a solicitor and immediately after qualifying she entered party politics, in other words she has no experience in the real world that the rest of the British people inhabit.

Warsi stood for election in her home town of Dewsbury and was rejected.  This was the first and only time she has subjected herself to the people at the ballot box and  the closest she has ever come to democracy.

Rejection by the people at the ballot box did not signal the end of Warsi's political career, on the contrary, it was the beginning of a stellar rise through the ranks.

Due to her gender and ethnicity she was made a life peer and Sayeedi Hussain Warsi became Baroness Warsi of Dewsbury in the County of West Yorkshire on full allowances and expenses paid for the 'Islamophobic' British people she despises.

At this particular time David Cameron was detoxifying the Conservative Party of its traditional values and trying to establish his multi-cultural credentials so he appointed the Baroness to Shadow Minister of State for Community Cohesion and Social Action.

Cameron then made her the co-chairman of the Conservative Party in a cynical attempt to attract the ethnic minority vote but the Baroness proved herself to be an embarrassment and such an utter failure that Cameron had to move her on for fear of damaging his image with the electorate.

The story goes that she pleaded for a place in Cabinet and based her argument on her gender and ethnic minority origins. "I'm a woman and I'm not white" she is reputed to whined.

Without a doubt Warsi would have played the race card had she been sacked therefore Cameron had no choice but to make her Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and she is currently Minister of State for Faith and Communities also.

Like her co-religionist the Baroness Uddin, she was caught cheating on her expenses by claiming rent when she had spent the night with a friend.

She also failed to declare outside income in the Lords Register of Interests and she broke the Ministerial code by travelling to Pakistan on a business trip with her friend and business partner Habid Hussain.

Hussain just happens to be involved with the radical Muslim group Hizb ut Tahrir which is banned by her own Conservative Party.

Whatever spin the Conservative Party puts on it, Baroness Warsi was promoted on the basis of her gender and ethnicity and was so under qualified that she turned out to be a total disaster who had to be moved aside to prevent further damage.

Baroness Warsi has now reverted to type and joined fellow Muslim Yasmin Alibai-Brown by playing the race and victim card and insulting the British people. This is the same British people who gave them and their families sanctuary together with opportunities that are still not available in their ancestral countries to this day.

These two ungrateful harpies are in denial about the part Muslims themselves play in the British people's attitude to Islam. They claim Muslim extremism is all the fault of the British people.

To quote the noble Baroness:

" the underlying, unfounded mistrust of Muslims is fuelling extremism"

In the British tradition trust has to be earned, so its up to the Muslim population to demonstrate why the British people should trust them.

"the media is not doing enough to combat negative views of Muslims"

Another British tradition is freedom of the press. Baroness Warsi is advocating press censorship in relation to Muslim criminality.

She doesn't want the people to know about the Muslim paedophile gangs in Oxford and Rotherham that targeted under age white girls and subjected them to unspeakable depravity.

The British people shouldn't read about the quaint Muslim tradition of 'honour killings' where women are murdered for being women.

The people shouldn't have a right to know about the lady in Cardiff, Wales who beat her own son to death with a hammer and burned his body because he wasn't memorising verses from the Koran fast enough.

" But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief "

One would be incorrect for thinking that this comment was made in jest, unbelievably she really does believe this nonsense.

I challenge the Baroness to educate us all on the Muslim tolerance of other religions, particularly in her families' native Pakistan where they murder men, women and children, burn down their homes and places of worship just for being a Christian.

"I will not take lessons on loyalty from those on the extreme right who demonstrate the ideology of intolerance"

Predictably as with all scoundrels, Warsi smears anyone who disagrees with her version of tolerence as belonging to the extreme right.

There has never been a more intolerant religion than Islam, which preaches killing of all Kufurs and the beheading of apostates who have finally seen the barbaric side of Islam and converted.

There are over 50 Muslim countries on the planet where the likes of Baroness Warsi and Yasmin Alibai-Brown can depart to where they can be free at last from the un-British people who's traditional views they are unable to tolerate.

*(The message articulated earlier in this post still applies)