Anti-White Project 1619. Rewriting American History

Propaganda and rewriting history have been essential weapons in the armory of tyrants down the ages as they attempt to demonize and delegitimize the regime they are endeavoring to overthrow as well as giving legitimacy to their own.

One would think that in today’s western democracies enlightened people would see this crude weapon for what it is and ignore it. This in turn might encourage the power brokers and their propagandists to refrain from insulting the people’s intelligence with their attempted forgery, but unfortunately this is not the case.

With their Project 1619, The New York Times has embarked on a propaganda campaign to rewrite history in true Pol Pot fashion. In their history-perverting minds, Year Zero in America was August 1619 with the arrival of the first slaves from Africa.

According to them it was on this date that the ‘true’ founding of America began. Shamefully, and with malice aforethought, Project 1619 is planned to be added to the school curriculum with the malign intention of brainwashing children with phony history. 

This false narrative not only ignores or downplays the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492 but also the arrival of the Paleo-Indians who arrived from Siberia around 10,000 BC.

According to the NYT, this crude attempt at rewriting history “places the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story that we tell ourselves about who we are”.

They want to make slavery the central issue in the entire history of the United States, but they ignore the part played by Irish, Asian and other non-African slaves whose contribution to the building of modern America was much more significant than that of plantation workers.

As bonded laborers Irish, Chinese and press ganged British paupers, along with other non-Africans, built the trans-continental railways as well as working on the tobacco and cotton plantations alongside the slaves from Africa. (See here)

This rewriting of history by the NYT is part of the ongoing and escalating war against white Americans where they are being demonized in the mainstream media and on the Democratic Party primary election campaign trail.

They are also attempting to deny the fact that it was European settlers and their descendants that founded the Republic and were the driving force that built the America we see today.

This perversion of true history is being perpetrated by the ideologically driven, left wing establishment as part of their long planned ‘fundamental transformation’ of America. As we recall, this was a campaign soundbite of that pretender to the crown, Barry Soetoro, known to the world as Barack Obama.

This articulate, telegenic, mixed-race speech reader with no history and a manufactured background was the front man for the deep state who have ramped up their anti-white rhetoric to hysterical levels since the election of President Trump.

Their ongoing project to transform America into a socialist state has been halted and put into reverse by the election of President Trump; this has forced them into evermore desperate measures which include the demonizing and denunciation of white people and the capitalist America they have created.

This demonizing and denunciation of white people is accompanied by accusations of white privilege, white supremacy, white nationalism and institutional racism which is used to delegitimize the very foundation and existence of America.       

The truth is that America was founded by white European settlers which included Christians fleeing religious persecution at home; the greatness and wealth of the country we see today is the result of the initiative, innovation, sacrifice, and pioneering spirit of those same white European settlers and their descendants.

What the NYT propaganda deliberately ignores is the fact that slavery was abolished in 1865 after some 620,000 mainly white people died in one of the bloodiest civil wars in history. Combined with the civil rights laws of the 1960’s the American dream became available to all citizens regardless of skin color or the country of origin of their ancestors.

For the Democrats and the deep state to achieve their socialist dream it is imperative that black people retain their victim status and the plantation mentality along with their animosity toward white people regardless of whether they are the actual descendents of slaves, or Africans who arrived voluntarily as migrants seeking a better life.

The call for reparations by the Democratic candidates is deliberately designed to appeal to their anti-white, anti-American base and to stoke up interracial tensions even further.

Such is their hatred of capitalist America and its white history, it would suit their purposes to ignite a race war which they hope would result in its downfall after which they could build their beloved socialist state out of the wreckage.

Judging by the demographics of gun ownership this would be a massive miscalculation with grave consequences for themselves and their socialist dream.   

For the benefit of the NYT, along with its readers and the rest of the world, the history of Africans in America covers a mere four hundred years while that of the Europeans is five hundred and twenty-seven years and that of the Paleo-Indians and their modern descendants some twelve thousand years.

The NYT Project 1619 is just another attempt by socialists and their fellow travelers to rewrite history in order to precipitate the downfall of capitalist America and the descendants of the white Europeans responsible for its founding.

The Truth About White Slavery and The Myth of White Supremacy

David Lammy, the Member of Parliament for the London ghetto of Tottenham, is a vile racist who is totally obsessed with skin colour. He uses his black privilege and the two-tier criminal justice system to make pejorative, anti-white statements about the British people knowing he can get away with it without sanction.

He has incited violence against white people who cannot respond in kind because of his black privilege and the immunity given to him by the two-tier criminal justice system. The once respected protectors of law and order are now dedicated to imposing a politically correct agenda on behalf of the state. This includes shutting down any criticism of Lammy and his supporters with threats of prosecution and even imprisonment.

The following article will be considered as provocative and racist, but it is the truth and an indictment of the police, the media, political establishment and everyone else who allow Lammy to get away with hate speech and incitement to violence without sanction. It is also a challenge to these same people to stop pandering to racists like Lammy by returning the justice system to equality under law and treating Lammy as they would any other racist:

                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s not surprising when black politicians use their skin color to endear themselves to their black constituents in order to get re-elected and remain aboard the gravy train. At a time when false narratives, fake news and outright lying are employed by politicians in their election campaigns they are employing what they consider to be an acceptable practice.  

What is unforgivable and downright evil is for these black politicians to stir up racial hatred and violence against white people by claiming to be the victims of the long-abolished slave trade. Their outrageously false claim is that the legacy of slavery has perpetuated their victimhood which is manifested today by so-called white supremacy and white privilege of the host population.

Due to the rewriting of history, slavery is falsely portrayed as being exclusively perpetrated by white people forcibly removing black people from Africa to labour on the farms and plantations of America and the colonies.

Actual history has shown us that slavery is not exclusively white on black but endemic across the planet down the ages including the victors in war enslaving the vanquished. The Egyptians and Babylonians enslaved the Israelites, the Romans enslaved the British, the Turks enslaved the Greeks and so on and so forth.

More recently, the Nazi's enslaved the Jews and other unfavoured ethnic groups in purpose made concentration/extermination camps.

Even Africans were enslaving other Africans and selling them to Arabs and other slave traders prior to the arrival of Europeans. Slavery is still legal in many Islamic countries and in some other countries in the developing world to this day. 

The existence of white slaves and indentured labourers that could also be bought and sold in the slave markets is studiously ignored by Lammy and his ilk. Also ignored is the transportation to the colonies of debtors, petty criminals and those considered to be ‘undesirables’ to be used as slave labour by the British ruling class of the day.

Black politicians and their anti-white supporters also never mention the workhouses and debtors’ prisons that were nothing less than institutions of white slavery that persisted long after the slave trade was abolished in Great Britain and the colonies.

These black politicians are well aware that institutional white slavery existed, but they deliberately ignore it because it doesn’t fit with their white imposed victimhood narrative. They totally ignore the barons and serfdom which was white slavery that endured in Great Britain for centuries.

No student of British history could possibly argue that conditions in the coal mines, iron works and fabric mills during the British industrial revolution were infinitely worse than the cotton fields and sugar plantations of America and the colonies.

The same can be said for housing where the working classes lived in the most appalling vermin infested slums with little or no amenities as opposed to a wooden cabin on a plantation albeit a rudimentary structure.

The industry owners of the day were no better than slave masters who used the truck system of remuneration along with debt to keep their workers enslaved to their factories, coal mines, mills and foundries and wages at starvation levels.

It must be remembered that women and children also worked in the same appalling conditions in coal mines, iron works, mills and factories for long hours earning nothing more than a pittance. It was said at the time that the owners gave their employees just enough so that they would reproduce and supply another generation of cheap, enslaved workers. 

The continual verbal abuse of white British citizens by David Lammy MP and his fellow ingrates is not just divisive but it is stirring up racial hatred using rewritten history which makes it infinitely worse.

His constant accusations of white supremacy and white privilege needs to be countered before it becomes accepted as the established truth which will relegate the actual truth to the status of myth.

Lammy is a Labour MP so he should at least know something of the history of the British working class and the folklore of the Labour Movement he claims to represent. It is a history of deprivation, sacrifice and bloodshed exclusively suffered by the ancestors of the white people he now gratuitously insults.

In the Great Britain he hates because of the slave trade he should at least acknowledge the lengths the people went to in order to abolish it. This began with Somerset v Stewart in 1772 when slavery was proved to be unsupported in British law.

White people went on to abolish slavery by passing the Slave Trade Act in 1807 and led by abolitionist, William Wilberforce, white people abolished slavery once and for across the empire by passing the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833.

In addition to these legislative efforts, mill workers used their white privilege to get killed in the Peterloo massacre of 1819 while agitating for Parliamentary reform.

In the Merthyr Rising of 1831 white people rose up in insurrection after the Iron Masters refused to alleviate the appalling deprivation being suffered by the iron workers and coal miners. To set an example to the working class, coal miners leader, Richard Lewis, was falsely accused of stabbing a soldier and subsequently hanged. 

The white leaders of the Tollpuddle Martyrs were transported to the prison colony in Australia in 1834 for trying to form a trade union.

During the Chartist Uprising in Newport in 1839 white working-class people were massacred while agitating for Parliamentary reform. The leaders were sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered. Fortunately, the sentence was commuted to transportation to the prison colony in Australia.

The Jarrow Crusade in 1936 saw members of the working-class communities use their white privilege to march from Jarrow in the north of England to London in order to present a petition to Parliament protesting unemployment and poverty.

The freedoms and relative prosperity enjoyed by the British people today was won by the blood and sacrifice of a population that endured poverty and conditions that were worse than any plantation worker.

David Lammy’s parents took advantage of this sacrifice and voluntarily left their sun kissed Caribbean paradise to make their way to a cold, wet and windswept island in the north Atlantic with a ninety percent white population.

This is the same island and population that their son claims are racists and white supremacists whose sole mission in life is to use their white privilege to oppress Mr. Lammy and the black community presumably to make their lives intolerable.

Mr. Lammy was so oppressed and discriminated against by the white people of Great Britain that he availed himself of a first-class education. He was awarded a scholarship at the of age ten to attend a prestigious school founded by Henry VIII. He went on to study law at the University of London Law School and then to Harvard University in racist America. He was called to the bar at Lincolns Inn and practiced as a Barrister before becoming a Member of Parliament.

Not too bad for a country he claims uses institutional racism and intolerance to discriminate against black people to keep them confined to menial jobs in the ghetto.

According to the 2011 census, white British comprise 87.1% of the population so it’s obvious that they will be the dominant ethnic group and their way of life will take precedent over that of more recent arrivals. Black British comprise 3.0%, Indian British 2.3% and Chinese British 0.7%.

It is noticeable that the Indian and Chinese British communities combined also comprise 3% of the population but they don’t insult and smear the white British people despite being shipped to all corners of the empire like the Africans were.

It could be that the Indian and Chinese British are industrious, entrepreneurial, self-supporting, family orientated communities who take advantage of the opportunities Great Britain has to offer as opposed to wallowing in victimhood from a long-gone era while blaming white people and demanding reparations.

Looking at the state of the African nations that sold their fellow countrymen to the slave traders, David Lammy should be grateful that his ancestors were shipped to the colonies because he may not be the successful wealthy man he is today, he may not even have existed at all.

It is the view of many that his ancestors were not so much stolen from Africa but rescued. No one denies they suffered hardship but no worse than the ancestors of British white working class who were not responsible for slavery.  

The British people have no white privilege and they are not white supremacists. To insult and smear them as if they are white supremacists who were responsible for slavery serves only to stir up division and hatred which will not benefit his community, or any other community, should it descend into inter-communal animosity and violence.

I will conclude with the words of the great Mohammad Ali when asked about what he thought about Africa after he spent some time there preparing for his rumble in the jungle with George Foreman

“I’m glad my granddaddy got on that boat”.

Amen to that.


                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------


Previous and associated articles:


Labours' David Lammy 'fakes' race hate letters.


David Lammy - Black Privilege, White Hatred and Immunity.

Compensation For Slavery - Caribbean Islanders Join The Mau Mau Gravy Train

It didn't take long after the British government caved in to international pressure and agreed to compensate the Mau Mau butchers of Kenya for the descendants of other so called 'victims' of the naughty British to jump on the easy money gravy train.

After the success of the Mau Mau terrorists using distorted history to drum up support amongst the professional international grievance industry, the leaders of twelve Caribbean countries were not slow to spot an opportunity to make some easy money. They have banded together and formed the Caribbean Community with a view to using the so called 'Mau Mau model' to extort a bit of loot of their own.

The Caribbean grievance mongers haven't got off to a very good start as the 'Mau Mau model' is based on allegations of torture and physical abuse as opposed to "the lingering legacy of slavery".

The allegations of abuse are a bit rich coming from the Mau Mau who were notorious for their brutality, not only against the British but against innocent civilians from their own people.

The British government, led by Foreign Secretary William Haig, either didn't do history at school or he is deliberately ignoring it in order to curry favour with the professional international grievance industry.

As with any uprising, the Mau Mau revolt in Kenya was a brutal affair with atrocities committed on both sides.  The Mau Mau however are acknowledged to have surpassed brutality even by African standards. They paid particular attention to women, children and old people for rape, mutilations and torture before death. Burning victims alive was another favourite pastime.

It would appear that William Haig, better known as 'Little Willie Squit' in his hometown, has chosen to ignore the survivors of the Lari and Chuka massacres, to name but two, in an act of appeasement over justice.

As was predicted by everyone outside of the political bubble, agreeing to pay compensation for perceived historical wrongs would set a precedent and open the floodgates to anyone with a grievance, real or imagined, to take the opportunity to gouge the British taxpayers for some easy money.

If the principle is to give cash compensation to the victims of physical abuse then it would be in order for the British government to share the 20 million they plan to give to the Mau Mau killers with their victims. Surely the grievance industry would not object to that.

In keeping with the principle of paying compensation to the victims of physical abuse in Kenya, it has been suggested that not a penny is handed over until the Kenyan government pays cash compensation to the victims and survivors of its own atrocities.

There are plenty to choose from including the Gorrissa massacre of 1980 and the Wagalla massacre of 1984 where 3,000 and 5,000 ethnic Somali villagers were butchered by Kenyan government troops.

Now the precedent is set for paying compensation to victims of death and abuse, we can look forward to the professional grievance industry demanding that their approved terrorist organisations follow the same rules :

a) the Palestinians pay the victims of the Lod Airport massacre of 26 innocents in 1972

b) Palestinians pay for the Ma'alot massacre of 29 Arab Christian women in 1974

c) the Tamil Tigers pay for the Anuradhapura massacre of 146 Buddhist nuns and monks in 1985 who were at prayer in a sacred shrine at the time.

The list of grievance hypocrisy is endless.

The claim for compensation by the Caribbean Community should be seen for what it is. An attempt by venal politicians and the legal vultures to extort money from a craven, cowardly government, that is more concerned with its international 'progressive' reputation than justice for the British taxpayer.

There is no "lingering legacy of slavery" in the Caribbean. It is surprising that Little Willie Squit doesn't know the history of slavery despite being the author of a best selling biography of William Wilberforce, the man accredited with abolishing the slave trade.

If there is poverty in these Caribbean Island paradises then it's the incompetence, corruption and criminality among the people and their leaders that is responsible and nothing to do with the events of 200 years ago.

The proposal to abolish the slave trade was put forward first in 1787 and then again in 1807. It was passed into law in 1833. The Caribbean Islands the British left behind were already developed, if they are in under-developed state today then the blame lies squarely with the Caribbean people themselves.

It's a mystery to many how some of these beautifully situated, fertile paradise islands can end up as the crime infested cesspits that they are today. The consensus is that they wouldn't be in this state if the British were still there.

As with the Mau Mau precedence, if these money grabbers are successful then the world can look forward to the professional grievance industry pushing for the Romans to compensate for British slavery, the Arabs for enslaving Africans, Africans for enslaving other Africans, the Turks for enslaving the Greeks and above all, the most famous cases of slavery in history, the Egyptians and the Babylonians for enslaving the Jews.

The assertion that the Caribbean slave trade generated the wealth which is the basis for Britain's prosperity today is utter nonsense. The Caribbean industries represented a mere five percent of the British economy and my ancestors didn't see a penny of it.

In conclusion it's worth noting some quotes from two African leaders who were against abolition of the slave trade.

"the slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and glory of their wealth"

King Geco of Dahomey

"we think this trade should go on. That is the verdict of our oracle and priests. They say that your country, however great, can never stop a trade ordained by God himself".

The King of Bony (now Nigeria) who was horrified at the Bill to abolish slavery in 1807.

It would appear that the people of Dahomey and Nigeria will be asked to cough up for their brothers and sisters suffering "the lingering legacy of slavery" among the palm trees on their sun drenched Caribbean Island prison.