Anti-White Project 1619. Rewriting American History

Propaganda and rewriting history have been essential weapons in the armory of tyrants down the ages as they attempt to demonize and delegitimize the regime they are endeavoring to overthrow as well as giving legitimacy to their own.

One would think that in today’s western democracies enlightened people would see this crude weapon for what it is and ignore it. This in turn might encourage the power brokers and their propagandists to refrain from insulting the people’s intelligence with their attempted forgery, but unfortunately this is not the case.

With their Project 1619, The New York Times has embarked on a propaganda campaign to rewrite history in true Pol Pot fashion. In their history-perverting minds, Year Zero in America was August 1619 with the arrival of the first slaves from Africa.

According to them it was on this date that the ‘true’ founding of America began. Shamefully, and with malice aforethought, Project 1619 is planned to be added to the school curriculum with the malign intention of brainwashing children with phony history. 

This false narrative not only ignores or downplays the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492 but also the arrival of the Paleo-Indians who arrived from Siberia around 10,000 BC.

According to the NYT, this crude attempt at rewriting history “places the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story that we tell ourselves about who we are”.

They want to make slavery the central issue in the entire history of the United States, but they ignore the part played by Irish, Asian and other non-African slaves whose contribution to the building of modern America was much more significant than that of plantation workers.

As bonded laborers Irish, Chinese and press ganged British paupers, along with other non-Africans, built the trans-continental railways as well as working on the tobacco and cotton plantations alongside the slaves from Africa. (See here)

This rewriting of history by the NYT is part of the ongoing and escalating war against white Americans where they are being demonized in the mainstream media and on the Democratic Party primary election campaign trail.

They are also attempting to deny the fact that it was European settlers and their descendants that founded the Republic and were the driving force that built the America we see today.

This perversion of true history is being perpetrated by the ideologically driven, left wing establishment as part of their long planned ‘fundamental transformation’ of America. As we recall, this was a campaign soundbite of that pretender to the crown, Barry Soetoro, known to the world as Barack Obama.

This articulate, telegenic, mixed-race speech reader with no history and a manufactured background was the front man for the deep state who have ramped up their anti-white rhetoric to hysterical levels since the election of President Trump.

Their ongoing project to transform America into a socialist state has been halted and put into reverse by the election of President Trump; this has forced them into evermore desperate measures which include the demonizing and denunciation of white people and the capitalist America they have created.

This demonizing and denunciation of white people is accompanied by accusations of white privilege, white supremacy, white nationalism and institutional racism which is used to delegitimize the very foundation and existence of America.       

The truth is that America was founded by white European settlers which included Christians fleeing religious persecution at home; the greatness and wealth of the country we see today is the result of the initiative, innovation, sacrifice, and pioneering spirit of those same white European settlers and their descendants.

What the NYT propaganda deliberately ignores is the fact that slavery was abolished in 1865 after some 620,000 mainly white people died in one of the bloodiest civil wars in history. Combined with the civil rights laws of the 1960’s the American dream became available to all citizens regardless of skin color or the country of origin of their ancestors.

For the Democrats and the deep state to achieve their socialist dream it is imperative that black people retain their victim status and the plantation mentality along with their animosity toward white people regardless of whether they are the actual descendents of slaves, or Africans who arrived voluntarily as migrants seeking a better life.

The call for reparations by the Democratic candidates is deliberately designed to appeal to their anti-white, anti-American base and to stoke up interracial tensions even further.

Such is their hatred of capitalist America and its white history, it would suit their purposes to ignite a race war which they hope would result in its downfall after which they could build their beloved socialist state out of the wreckage.

Judging by the demographics of gun ownership this would be a massive miscalculation with grave consequences for themselves and their socialist dream.   

For the benefit of the NYT, along with its readers and the rest of the world, the history of Africans in America covers a mere four hundred years while that of the Europeans is five hundred and twenty-seven years and that of the Paleo-Indians and their modern descendants some twelve thousand years.

The NYT Project 1619 is just another attempt by socialists and their fellow travelers to rewrite history in order to precipitate the downfall of capitalist America and the descendants of the white Europeans responsible for its founding.

The Truth About White Slavery and The Myth of White Supremacy

David Lammy, the Member of Parliament for the London ghetto of Tottenham, is a vile racist who is totally obsessed with skin colour. He uses his black privilege and the two-tier criminal justice system to make pejorative, anti-white statements about the British people knowing he can get away with it without sanction.

He has incited violence against white people who cannot respond in kind because of his black privilege and the immunity given to him by the two-tier criminal justice system. The once respected protectors of law and order are now dedicated to imposing a politically correct agenda on behalf of the state. This includes shutting down any criticism of Lammy and his supporters with threats of prosecution and even imprisonment.

The following article will be considered as provocative and racist, but it is the truth and an indictment of the police, the media, political establishment and everyone else who allow Lammy to get away with hate speech and incitement to violence without sanction. It is also a challenge to these same people to stop pandering to racists like Lammy by returning the justice system to equality under law and treating Lammy as they would any other racist:

                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s not surprising when black politicians use their skin color to endear themselves to their black constituents in order to get re-elected and remain aboard the gravy train. At a time when false narratives, fake news and outright lying are employed by politicians in their election campaigns they are employing what they consider to be an acceptable practice.  

What is unforgivable and downright evil is for these black politicians to stir up racial hatred and violence against white people by claiming to be the victims of the long-abolished slave trade. Their outrageously false claim is that the legacy of slavery has perpetuated their victimhood which is manifested today by so-called white supremacy and white privilege of the host population.

Due to the rewriting of history, slavery is falsely portrayed as being exclusively perpetrated by white people forcibly removing black people from Africa to labour on the farms and plantations of America and the colonies.

Actual history has shown us that slavery is not exclusively white on black but endemic across the planet down the ages including the victors in war enslaving the vanquished. The Egyptians and Babylonians enslaved the Israelites, the Romans enslaved the British, the Turks enslaved the Greeks and so on and so forth.

More recently, the Nazi's enslaved the Jews and other unfavoured ethnic groups in purpose made concentration/extermination camps.

Even Africans were enslaving other Africans and selling them to Arabs and other slave traders prior to the arrival of Europeans. Slavery is still legal in many Islamic countries and in some other countries in the developing world to this day. 

The existence of white slaves and indentured labourers that could also be bought and sold in the slave markets is studiously ignored by Lammy and his ilk. Also ignored is the transportation to the colonies of debtors, petty criminals and those considered to be ‘undesirables’ to be used as slave labour by the British ruling class of the day.

Black politicians and their anti-white supporters also never mention the workhouses and debtors’ prisons that were nothing less than institutions of white slavery that persisted long after the slave trade was abolished in Great Britain and the colonies.

These black politicians are well aware that institutional white slavery existed, but they deliberately ignore it because it doesn’t fit with their white imposed victimhood narrative. They totally ignore the barons and serfdom which was white slavery that endured in Great Britain for centuries.

No student of British history could possibly argue that conditions in the coal mines, iron works and fabric mills during the British industrial revolution were infinitely worse than the cotton fields and sugar plantations of America and the colonies.

The same can be said for housing where the working classes lived in the most appalling vermin infested slums with little or no amenities as opposed to a wooden cabin on a plantation albeit a rudimentary structure.

The industry owners of the day were no better than slave masters who used the truck system of remuneration along with debt to keep their workers enslaved to their factories, coal mines, mills and foundries and wages at starvation levels.

It must be remembered that women and children also worked in the same appalling conditions in coal mines, iron works, mills and factories for long hours earning nothing more than a pittance. It was said at the time that the owners gave their employees just enough so that they would reproduce and supply another generation of cheap, enslaved workers. 

The continual verbal abuse of white British citizens by David Lammy MP and his fellow ingrates is not just divisive but it is stirring up racial hatred using rewritten history which makes it infinitely worse.

His constant accusations of white supremacy and white privilege needs to be countered before it becomes accepted as the established truth which will relegate the actual truth to the status of myth.

Lammy is a Labour MP so he should at least know something of the history of the British working class and the folklore of the Labour Movement he claims to represent. It is a history of deprivation, sacrifice and bloodshed exclusively suffered by the ancestors of the white people he now gratuitously insults.

In the Great Britain he hates because of the slave trade he should at least acknowledge the lengths the people went to in order to abolish it. This began with Somerset v Stewart in 1772 when slavery was proved to be unsupported in British law.

White people went on to abolish slavery by passing the Slave Trade Act in 1807 and led by abolitionist, William Wilberforce, white people abolished slavery once and for across the empire by passing the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833.

In addition to these legislative efforts, mill workers used their white privilege to get killed in the Peterloo massacre of 1819 while agitating for Parliamentary reform.

In the Merthyr Rising of 1831 white people rose up in insurrection after the Iron Masters refused to alleviate the appalling deprivation being suffered by the iron workers and coal miners. To set an example to the working class, coal miners leader, Richard Lewis, was falsely accused of stabbing a soldier and subsequently hanged. 

The white leaders of the Tollpuddle Martyrs were transported to the prison colony in Australia in 1834 for trying to form a trade union.

During the Chartist Uprising in Newport in 1839 white working-class people were massacred while agitating for Parliamentary reform. The leaders were sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered. Fortunately, the sentence was commuted to transportation to the prison colony in Australia.

The Jarrow Crusade in 1936 saw members of the working-class communities use their white privilege to march from Jarrow in the north of England to London in order to present a petition to Parliament protesting unemployment and poverty.

The freedoms and relative prosperity enjoyed by the British people today was won by the blood and sacrifice of a population that endured poverty and conditions that were worse than any plantation worker.

David Lammy’s parents took advantage of this sacrifice and voluntarily left their sun kissed Caribbean paradise to make their way to a cold, wet and windswept island in the north Atlantic with a ninety percent white population.

This is the same island and population that their son claims are racists and white supremacists whose sole mission in life is to use their white privilege to oppress Mr. Lammy and the black community presumably to make their lives intolerable.

Mr. Lammy was so oppressed and discriminated against by the white people of Great Britain that he availed himself of a first-class education. He was awarded a scholarship at the of age ten to attend a prestigious school founded by Henry VIII. He went on to study law at the University of London Law School and then to Harvard University in racist America. He was called to the bar at Lincolns Inn and practiced as a Barrister before becoming a Member of Parliament.

Not too bad for a country he claims uses institutional racism and intolerance to discriminate against black people to keep them confined to menial jobs in the ghetto.

According to the 2011 census, white British comprise 87.1% of the population so it’s obvious that they will be the dominant ethnic group and their way of life will take precedent over that of more recent arrivals. Black British comprise 3.0%, Indian British 2.3% and Chinese British 0.7%.

It is noticeable that the Indian and Chinese British communities combined also comprise 3% of the population but they don’t insult and smear the white British people despite being shipped to all corners of the empire like the Africans were.

It could be that the Indian and Chinese British are industrious, entrepreneurial, self-supporting, family orientated communities who take advantage of the opportunities Great Britain has to offer as opposed to wallowing in victimhood from a long-gone era while blaming white people and demanding reparations.

Looking at the state of the African nations that sold their fellow countrymen to the slave traders, David Lammy should be grateful that his ancestors were shipped to the colonies because he may not be the successful wealthy man he is today, he may not even have existed at all.

It is the view of many that his ancestors were not so much stolen from Africa but rescued. No one denies they suffered hardship but no worse than the ancestors of British white working class who were not responsible for slavery.  

The British people have no white privilege and they are not white supremacists. To insult and smear them as if they are white supremacists who were responsible for slavery serves only to stir up division and hatred which will not benefit his community, or any other community, should it descend into inter-communal animosity and violence.

I will conclude with the words of the great Mohammad Ali when asked about what he thought about Africa after he spent some time there preparing for his rumble in the jungle with George Foreman

“I’m glad my granddaddy got on that boat”.

Amen to that.


                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------


Previous and associated articles:


Labours' David Lammy 'fakes' race hate letters.


David Lammy - Black Privilege, White Hatred and Immunity.

Slavery, Child Rape, Acid Attacks – What Happened To Great Britain?

Three news stories from the Sceptred Isle demonstrate how far Great Britain has been degraded from the global superpower that brought civilization and development to twenty-three percent of the world’s population and administered twenty-four percent of the world’s landmass down to something resembling the backward, undeveloped territories they first encountered.

Although the British Empire took just over two centuries to reach its zenith, it took British civilization some five thousand years to develop from Stonehenge c.4000BC to the Bill of Rights in 1689 through to Universal Suffrage in 1918.

In addition, at great cost in blood and treasure and with the help of its allies, Great Britain fought and won two great wars for civilization against enemies so debased that had they prevailed they would have set back civilization centuries.

   

It would be foolish to deny that during the course of British ascendancy mistakes were made as was the case with all empires but on balance the contribution of the British to civilization around the world far outweighs the negatives.

During this evolution of civilization abolitionist William Wilberforce and his fellow campaigners fought a twenty year battle to abolish slavery culminating in the Abolition of Slavery Act in 1833. Wilberforce and his friends were unashamedly Christian and let it be known that their crusade was guided by religion, morality and education.

By design rather than accident of history so-called ‘progressives’ have driven these virtues from public life as part of the managed decline of the country and as a consequence Great Britain has seen the return of slavery to every major town and city. Likewise the grooming and gang rape of underage white girls by racist gangs of Muslim men and acid attacks on unsuspecting members of the public have entered the public domain.

The modern political class has stood by and watched this descent into barbarity and done nothing to stop it, in fact their inaction over the decades is proof positive it’s a deliberate policy to downgrade the nation.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) has reported that modern slavery and human trafficking are more prevalent than previously thought with 300 live policing operations in every major town and city in the country. It also said that previous estimates of between 10,000-13,000 victims were found to be the “tip of the iceberg”.

To the eternal shame of the political class who allowed this to happen, some of the victims of this modern day slavery and human trafficking are children. (See here)

Equally shaming for the political class is their tolerance and tacit approval of Muslim grooming gangs who like slavery and human trafficking gangs have been allowed to operate in every major town and city across the land.

These sub human barbarians gang raped and pimped out 1,200 underage white girls in the English town of Rotherham until they were apprehended in 1997. This horrific abuse was perpetrated with the full knowledge, and therefore approval of, the police, the education system, the Member of Parliament and most horrifically the local authority including the child welfare department.

When the Rotherham grooming gang scandal first surfaced in 1997 the British public were led to believe that this was a one-off scandal exposed and rolled up in the nick of time. The majority of the British public was unaware that Muslim grooming gangs have continued to operate in hundreds of towns and cities across the country to the present day, gang raping and pimping out underage white girls on an industrial scale with the tacit approval of the authorities. (See here)

Now added to this are acid attacks whereby acid is thrown in the faces of unsuspecting victims for the purpose of robbery or punishment for recalcitrant women in the Muslim community. (See here)

These are in addition to other barbaric horrors that are prevalent and tolerated such as the genital mutilation of young girls, incest, child brides, polygamy and pedophilia to name but a few.

This is the sort of uncivilized barbarity one expects in backward, third world hell holes populated by illiterate savages that have yet to emerge into the modern era not in 21^st century Great Britain.

This deliberate degrading of Great Britain in the name of the global equality of nations has been in progress for decades but has accelerated since the Blair government opened the borders to all and sundry in 1997 regardless of their position on the evolutionary scale.

But for the global political elite and their ‘fundamental transformation’ agenda there’s no reason that the upward movement toward greater civilization could not have continued in perpetuity for the good of all mankind. The last generation must be turning in their graves at what has become of the country they fought and sacrificed so much for.

Associated articles:

*Please note - The bought-and-paid-for politically correct media distance the Muslim community from these horrific crimes by altering the language they use when referring to the perpetrators and their crimes. 

Hence the grooming, rape and pimping out of young girls is referred to as 'Child Sexual Exploitation' or the initials 'CSE'.

The predominately Muslim offenders are referred to as Asian.

"White Women Are Only Good For One Thing - For People Like Me To F*** And Use As Trash".

Asian grooming gangs abusing school girls weren't probed due to 'political correctness'.

Racist rapists handed lower sentences because their victims were WHITE.

Social worker 'failed to safeguard 11 girls groomed by sex gang.


Grooming Gang Statistics

Child Sexual Exploitation Rotherham

Bob Marley and the Whiners - Why Do Half Cracker Celebs Always Choose Black?

Its a crying shame when people who are in a position of power and influence ignore the opportunity to use it positively, but choose instead to do the opposite by promoting victimhood, division and hatred.

This pertains particularly to celebrities of mixed race parents who have achieved global fame and fortune and who's following consists of millions of people of all races, religions and age groups. They are especially influential among the impressionable young and those who don't have the intellectual ability to see through the slick marketing of their various PR machines.

The late Bob Marley is a classic example of this sad waste of opportunity and he is only one among many as will be highlighted later.

Bob Marley is not only credited with making reggae/Caribbean music globally popular but also for drawing attention to the trans-Atlantic slave trade from the viewpoint of a victim.

One gullible adolescent commented that ''his haunting lyrics and their unique delivery pierce the heart and he has the ability to generate emotions that should cover any self respecting white person with shame.''  It is views such as these that demonstrate the effectiveness of people like Marley in stirring up divisiveness, self loathing and hatred.

Bob Marley's crusade would hold a lot more credibility if he really was a victim descended from slaves and his lyrics reflected actual history instead of distortions and outright falsification.

Marley's father was a white plantation overseer who's family hailed from Sussex and there is no place more quintessentially English than Sussex.

No plantation for our Bob, he was born on his grandfather's farm in St Anne's, one of the more salubrious areas of Jamaica. Being of mixed race, he could have used his fame and influence to heal and bring people together; he could have extolled the virtues of both white and black people. He could have demonstrated that the offspring of inter racial marriages can be talented and achieve anything they set their minds to do.

Instead he chose to adopt the 'victim-of-slavery' persona which engenders division, self loathing and racial animosity.

The lyrics of his song, "Buffalo Soldier" is a classic example of distorting history to stir up negative emotions.

"There was a buffalo soldier in the heart of America

  Stolen from Africa, brought to America

  Fighting on arrival, fighting for survival"

Marley would have known that the American and Caribbean slave trades were entirely separate. The British and French shipped Africans and others directly to the Caribbean not via America. He would also have known that the buffalo soldiers were fed and watered the same way as any other regiment in the US army. If they were fighting for survival then so were the other soldiers.

Black people were not the only victims of the Caribbean plantation owners. He is ignoring the fact that there were white indentured workers on the plantations before the Africans arrived.  There were also Irish slave girls, press-ganged workers and convicts all "stolen from Great Britain and brought to the Caribbean".

In Bob Marley's case 'Stolen from Sussex' would be a valid lyric but it wouldn't have the same emotional impact.

"If you know your history
 
Then you would know where your coming from

Then you wouldn't have to ask me

Who the 'eck do I think I am"

From these lyrics it would appear that Marley is ignoring the fact that his own history includes the English county of Sussex and he is denying it in order to identify himself with the victims of slavery.

"Said he was a buffalo soldier, win the war for America
 
 Buffalo soldier, dreadlock rasta

 Fighting on arrival, fighting for survival

 Driven from the mainland to the heart of the Caribbean"

'Win the war for America' and 'Driven from the mainland to the heart of the Caribbean' is taking poetic licence and distortion of history a tad too far.

Unfortunately Bob Marley is not alone in wasting the opportunity of being of mixed race to heal divisions and bring people together.

Halle Berry and Beyoncé, two of the worlds most recognizable celebrities both dishonour their parents by identifying themselves exclusively with their black half. So does Eric Holder, Susan Rice and the ultimate black impostor, Barry Obama.

By indentifying himself exclusively with his African father he is insulting his white mother. Obama senior was a serial womanizer and a drunk who abandoned Barry when he was young. In his book 'Dreams From My Father', he admits he only has a single month worth of memories of his father.

Being a native of Kenya, Obama senior, and by extension Obama junior, had no connection whatsoever with slavery.  Barry himself was brought up in Indonesia and spent his formative years in Hawaii.

It should be obvious to everyone that Barry Obama is adopting his African-American, victim-of-slavery persona to harvest the votes of the black community together with those of the 'progressive', self loathing white community. These deluded people are under the illusion that they are going to escape unscathed if Barry's divisive racial agenda spills over into violence.

This is cynical manipulation of the media and the people at its worse and it is a mystery why the people can't see through it and understand the peril they have brought upon themselves.

"Honour thy father and thy mother that thy days be long upon the land" - 5th Commandment

American Prosperity And African Poverty - Reality Ignored By Black Racists

Anyone who has had the privilege of travelling in sub Saharan Africa cannot fail to have noticed how lush the countryside is owing mainly to the high fertility of the rich, red volcanic soils. What travelers cannot see are the continents other abundant riches consisting of minerals, petro-chemicals, diamonds and other economically viable resources.

Similarly blessed with the same abundant resources is the American continent but in order to illustrate the point, the comparison will be limited to the United States.

After the discovery of the fossil skeleton named Lucy, experts announced that this was the first upright walking humanoid and estimated that it inhabited Africa some 3.2 million years ago.

Archaeologists suggest that the USA was first colonized by Paeleo-Indians who crossed the Bering Land Bridge from East Asia into what is now Alaska, anywhere between forty thousand and seventeen thousand years ago and migrated southward.

Both Lucy and the Paeleo-Indians (who were originally descended from Lucy) didn't evolve past the hunter gatherer stage until the arrival of the Europeans in the 15th century for America, and as late as the 19th century for Africa.

The exploitation of these resources and the resultant astronomical increase in prosperity, civilization and quality of life across Africa and the USA did not begin until the arrival of the Europeans.

Its worth reiterating that despite the God given riches, Africa and America were two continents populated by desperately poor, uncivilized, warring tribes, who suffered starvation, disease and abysmally low life expectancy for millions of years until the arrival of the Europeans.

Before I advance any further, I understand the argument that these people would have been better off if the Europeans had left them alone. This is the most juvenile nonsense and is being advanced by a motley collection of hippies, white middle class hand wringers, bleeding hearts, self loathers, the foreign aid industry and a horde of publicity seeking celebrity millionaires who are polishing their humanitarian credentials in order to swell their already bloated coffers and finance their hypocrisy.

They believe that without European colonization these tribes would be living happy peaceful lives to this day; living in harmony with Mother Earth taking only what they need. These people are seriously deluded. If the Europeans hadn't arrived then the Russians, Japanese, Chinese or Nazi's surely would have and if so there wouldn't be a native alive anywhere between Cairo and Cape Town or between Wasilla and Washington DC.

To continue: It only took the American people four hundred years to become the most prosperous people on the planet, with the greatest jump in prosperity coming in the last two hundred years. Similarly, the riches of Africa were released with a massive increase in wealth during the last one hundred and thirty years.

It would be foolish at this point to deny that abuses were perpetrated by the colonists on both continents, however this should be regarded as an unfortunate part of civilisation's evolution, a kind of historical learning curve.

The attitudes widely held back then have been largely eradicated by the descendants of the Europeans and anyone in America, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion or skin colour can take part in the American dream if they choose to do so. Alternatively they can choose not to do so and blame the white man for their condition or the mythical "lingering legacy of slavery."

After billions of years of laying untouched in the ground and after 3.2 million years of humanoid habitation and evolution, the wealth of Africa was finally exploited and released by the Europeans. This advance of civilisation was unacceptable to the new breed of 'progressives' infesting the United Nations and as a consequence the Europeans were blackmailed and bullied into to handing everything over to the Africans.

The results are there for all to see: on a continent blessed with abundant riches of all kinds.  Poverty, starvation, disease, violent crime, low life expectancy etc. have all returned, and we can add to this black on black racism.

It must be remembered that the hard work had already been done by the Europeans. Armed only with their self belief, work ethic and a desire for a better life, they took an untouched continent, developed it and released its riches.

When the Africans took over, the technology was developed, the infrastructure was in place, the wealth was already created, all they had to do was continue running the government and the industries.

After half a century of self rule and with countless billions in aid from countries with far less human and natural resources, African run Africa is a total disaster and a blight on humanity. This sad situation cannot be blamed on Europeans or the white man or the "lingering legacy of Colonialism." The black African is solely to blame, they had it all and they threw it away, they are the authors of their own misfortune.

The evolution of modern America is a similar story, but in addition to self belief, work ethic and a desire for a better life, the American people were armed with a 4487 word Constitution which guaranteed individual liberty, free enterprise and limited government.

In only two hundred years a handful of people from thirteen colonies created the biggest economy on the planet, they created more prosperity for more people in all human history.

The divisively named 'African'-Americans have been free to participate for over one hundred and fifty of those two hundred years and yet millions remain in so called poverty and continue to blame their condition on the white man or the same mythical "lingering legacy of slavery."

People are, by and large, afraid to discuss the reasons for black so called poverty for fear of being smeared by the cultural Marxists who infest the American political class and media.  As a result the myths and falsehoods are allowed to perpetuate and go unchallenged.

No such fear inhabits this site so the truth can be written and stuff the consequences. Publish and be damned is the order of the day.

So called black poverty in America is the sole responsibility of the black people themselves, combined with the cynical manipulation by vile black racists who have a vested interest in keeping the hate and divisiveness going.

Apart from the usual race baiters such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the increasingly demented Louis Farrakhan, the leading protagonists for stirring up racial hatred and its resultant 'poverty' are household names who should be ashamed of themselves. Oprah Winfrey, Attorney General Eric Holder, Barry Obama and his bitter and twisted wife, Michelle.

Looking closer at their public appearances and pronouncements one can see their contempt and simmering hatred toward white people. It is not difficult to spot the face contorting hatred Michelle Obama exhibits whenever she is forced to interact with or speak about white people. It's unexplainable why she is like this because outside of the manufactured media created image, she has never been poor nor has she endured the hardships normally associated with so called black poverty.

It is now being acknowledged at long last that black people have the same access to education and government services as anyone else and it isn't the white man that forces them to drop out, kill each other, join street gangs, deal in drugs, to have babies out of wedlock or live on welfare.

The condition of black people in America is a result of their own poor decision making, not the white man or the 'lingering legacy of slavery'. Many impressionable black people are influenced by the race baiting and hate filled behavior of people like Oprah Winfrey, Eric Holder and the Obamas. Shame on them.

Black people in America have succeeded in all fields from politics, sport, entertainment, business, industry, the military, medicine etc. etc. People such as Colin Powell, Condaleezza Rice, Bill Cosby, Michael Jordan, Jay Z, Dr Ben Carson, Herman Cain and millions more. Even the President of the United States and the First Lady are black. ( In Barry's case only half black).

It has to be accepted that the there is no 'lingering legacy of slavery'; that's all gone, its over and done with but it is still being used as an excuse by unscrupulous race baiters to make a good living out of perpetuating hatred.

This is a stunning intervention in the debate by American war hero and former black Congressman from Florida, Colonel Allan West. He says it better than anyone.

"This is my clear and succinct message to white Americans. How long will it be before 'you people' realize you have elevated someone to the office of president who abjectly hates you - not to mention his henchman Holder. Combined they are the most vile and disgusting racists - not you."

Many black people are seeing the light as demonstrated by the people such as Bill Cosby.

Here is a must see video of a black American who gets it and isn't afraid to tell the truth.

This is a hilarious video of a black Pastor who also gets it. If one can ignore his ranting style the message is potent.

Compensation For Slavery - Caribbean Islanders Join The Mau Mau Gravy Train

It didn't take long after the British government caved in to international pressure and agreed to compensate the Mau Mau butchers of Kenya for the descendants of other so called 'victims' of the naughty British to jump on the easy money gravy train.

After the success of the Mau Mau terrorists using distorted history to drum up support amongst the professional international grievance industry, the leaders of twelve Caribbean countries were not slow to spot an opportunity to make some easy money. They have banded together and formed the Caribbean Community with a view to using the so called 'Mau Mau model' to extort a bit of loot of their own.

The Caribbean grievance mongers haven't got off to a very good start as the 'Mau Mau model' is based on allegations of torture and physical abuse as opposed to "the lingering legacy of slavery".

The allegations of abuse are a bit rich coming from the Mau Mau who were notorious for their brutality, not only against the British but against innocent civilians from their own people.

The British government, led by Foreign Secretary William Haig, either didn't do history at school or he is deliberately ignoring it in order to curry favour with the professional international grievance industry.

As with any uprising, the Mau Mau revolt in Kenya was a brutal affair with atrocities committed on both sides.  The Mau Mau however are acknowledged to have surpassed brutality even by African standards. They paid particular attention to women, children and old people for rape, mutilations and torture before death. Burning victims alive was another favourite pastime.

It would appear that William Haig, better known as 'Little Willie Squit' in his hometown, has chosen to ignore the survivors of the Lari and Chuka massacres, to name but two, in an act of appeasement over justice.

As was predicted by everyone outside of the political bubble, agreeing to pay compensation for perceived historical wrongs would set a precedent and open the floodgates to anyone with a grievance, real or imagined, to take the opportunity to gouge the British taxpayers for some easy money.

If the principle is to give cash compensation to the victims of physical abuse then it would be in order for the British government to share the 20 million they plan to give to the Mau Mau killers with their victims. Surely the grievance industry would not object to that.

In keeping with the principle of paying compensation to the victims of physical abuse in Kenya, it has been suggested that not a penny is handed over until the Kenyan government pays cash compensation to the victims and survivors of its own atrocities.

There are plenty to choose from including the Gorrissa massacre of 1980 and the Wagalla massacre of 1984 where 3,000 and 5,000 ethnic Somali villagers were butchered by Kenyan government troops.

Now the precedent is set for paying compensation to victims of death and abuse, we can look forward to the professional grievance industry demanding that their approved terrorist organisations follow the same rules :

a) the Palestinians pay the victims of the Lod Airport massacre of 26 innocents in 1972

b) Palestinians pay for the Ma'alot massacre of 29 Arab Christian women in 1974

c) the Tamil Tigers pay for the Anuradhapura massacre of 146 Buddhist nuns and monks in 1985 who were at prayer in a sacred shrine at the time.

The list of grievance hypocrisy is endless.

The claim for compensation by the Caribbean Community should be seen for what it is. An attempt by venal politicians and the legal vultures to extort money from a craven, cowardly government, that is more concerned with its international 'progressive' reputation than justice for the British taxpayer.

There is no "lingering legacy of slavery" in the Caribbean. It is surprising that Little Willie Squit doesn't know the history of slavery despite being the author of a best selling biography of William Wilberforce, the man accredited with abolishing the slave trade.

If there is poverty in these Caribbean Island paradises then it's the incompetence, corruption and criminality among the people and their leaders that is responsible and nothing to do with the events of 200 years ago.

The proposal to abolish the slave trade was put forward first in 1787 and then again in 1807. It was passed into law in 1833. The Caribbean Islands the British left behind were already developed, if they are in under-developed state today then the blame lies squarely with the Caribbean people themselves.

It's a mystery to many how some of these beautifully situated, fertile paradise islands can end up as the crime infested cesspits that they are today. The consensus is that they wouldn't be in this state if the British were still there.

As with the Mau Mau precedence, if these money grabbers are successful then the world can look forward to the professional grievance industry pushing for the Romans to compensate for British slavery, the Arabs for enslaving Africans, Africans for enslaving other Africans, the Turks for enslaving the Greeks and above all, the most famous cases of slavery in history, the Egyptians and the Babylonians for enslaving the Jews.

The assertion that the Caribbean slave trade generated the wealth which is the basis for Britain's prosperity today is utter nonsense. The Caribbean industries represented a mere five percent of the British economy and my ancestors didn't see a penny of it.

In conclusion it's worth noting some quotes from two African leaders who were against abolition of the slave trade.

"the slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and glory of their wealth"

King Geco of Dahomey

"we think this trade should go on. That is the verdict of our oracle and priests. They say that your country, however great, can never stop a trade ordained by God himself".

The King of Bony (now Nigeria) who was horrified at the Bill to abolish slavery in 1807.

It would appear that the people of Dahomey and Nigeria will be asked to cough up for their brothers and sisters suffering "the lingering legacy of slavery" among the palm trees on their sun drenched Caribbean Island prison.

Barack Obama - America's First Half Cracker President

The term 'cracker', an insulting word used by black Americans toward their white compatriots, first came to public prominence after the New Black Panther voter intimidation scandal in Philadelphia during the Presidential elections of 2008.

In a vile rant after the scandal the New Black Panther leader , who names himself King Samir Shabazz, shared his views on his white compatriots with the world. According to this charming gentleman,  black Americans like himself  should  "kill crackers" and he even wants to "kill cracker babies".

According to President Obama's henchman at the Justice Department, Eric Holder, neither the voter intimidation nor the racially abusive statements afterward are severe enough to warrant a Shabazz prosecution. The term 'cracker' used to describe white Americans, has been given a pass by Eric Holder and it has now entered the lexicon of black Americans.

On the other hand celebrity chef Paula Deen has been publicly crucified and her career ruined because she admitted to using the word n****r some 30 years ago.

Before I continue I will relate an anecdote. During my travels through the mid American heartlands I had the good fortune to spend a morning chatting with a black American. He was in his mid thirties, married with two children and owned his own roofing business. By any account he would be considered a fairly prosperous member of the middle class.

During my expatriate career I spent many years working in Africa, East, West and Central so I was curious as to where his ancestors came from. He had no idea, what's more he didn't care and he was most put out by my question. His parents came from Tennessee, where he was born, and he was raised in Illinois. As far as he was concerned he was an American as apple pie with no links to Africa whatsoever.

If the media and those who indulge in racial politics are to be believed, all black Americans are disadvantaged by the legacy of slavery and middle class black Americans, like my roofing friend, are smeared as traitors or uncle Toms. They are consequently vilified by race baiters like the Reverend Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan, who ignore the fact that there are now more black American millionaires than ever.

Black Americans are now successful in all walks of life, from the military, business, industry, politics, sports, entertainment etc. If black Americans want to chase the American dream, they can, just ask Colin Powell, Condeleeza Rice, Oprah Winfrey, Denzil Washington, Bill Cosby, Jay Z etc.

Black Americans have a choice, they can follow the American Dream or they can follow King Samir Shabazz into the abyss or they can follow the Reverend Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan into eternal victimhood, crime and poverty.

It would be interesting to know if the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan or even King Samir Shabazz are the descendants of slaves or of Africans who emigrated to America after emancipation. It would also be good to know if any of these are tainted with 'cracker' blood somewhere in their ancestry.

The truth is, despite attempts to convince black Americans otherwise,  not all black Americans have a connection to slavery. Those that do not are now claiming otherwise in order to rub shoulders with history and adopt the heroic victim status that actual slave descendants claim.

As is now becoming apparent, President Obama is a media creation, who's claim to being the first African American President is totally dishonest. I fear that his current taxpayer funded vacation to Africa is being used to polish up his African credentials and to give him a link to slavery where none exists.

The media arranged photo op at the 'door of no return' in Senegal, reflecting with emotion on the spot where Africans, who were sold into slavery by their fellow Africans, departed the continent never to return, were particularly mawkish.

Any normal person, regardless of nationality or skin colour, would be similarly moved by the tragedy that enfolded on that very spot. There is no reason why this could not have been a private visit, after all its difficult to reflect properly when surrounded by the media and their cameramen.

The fear is that these emotive images will further radicalize the already sensitive black youth of America who have been convinced by the likes of Jackson and Farrakhan of the injustice they still suffer as a result of slavery.

President Obama then went on to use that choreographed visit in Senegal to claim that slavery is the reason why he, as an African American, is committed to global human rights. This is utterly dishonest and unworthy of the supposed leader of the free world.

Firstly, the truth is that Barack Obama is of mixed race on account of his mother being white, or in the words of King Samir Shabazz, a 'cracker' who, along with her babies, would have been killed if he had his way. President Obama disrespects his mother every time he claims to be an African American.

Secondly, his formative years were spent in Indonesia as Barry Soetoro and in Hawaii, so his contact with continental Americans was tenuous until adulthood.

Thirdly, for the record, his father was from Kenya, where no slaves were procured. His father, despite being a socialist, took advantage of the education on offer in the land of free enterprise to better himself and his fellow Kenyans on his return home.

Contrary to re-written history, Barack Obama Senior was not abused by the British on his return to Kenya but by his compatriot and dictator, President Jomo Kenyatta who victimized and abused him eventually denying him a means of making a living.

President Obama will go down in history as the most divisive President in history and worse still, he is dividing America along racial lines, providing a fertile ground for the likes of King Samir Shabazz and his New Black Panthers. They have embarked on a road that will lead to civil war and it is a war they will definitely lose.