Harry and Meghan Play the Race Card and Insult the Nation

Watching the slow-motion descent of former action man Prince Harry into a simpering wimp dominated by his plastic ever-so-woke Hollywood starlet is a tragedy beyond measure for the Monarchy and its supporters.

All the respect and admiration earned by Prince Harry on the battlefields of Afghanistan evaporated into the ether when he caved in and surrendered to the domination of his Trump hating, champagne socialist disciple of all the usual Hollywood causes.

As soon as it was announced that Prince Harry had taken up with a diva from the Hollywood acting fraternity Royal watchers and pundits alike knew in their hearts it would end badly for Harry.

Initially people respected their decision to withdraw from royal duties because they wanted to enjoy a private family life and raise their son Archie away from the publicity that plagued Harry’s mother Diana.

The public respect for Harry and his reputation started to evaporate when Meghan dropped the royal princess act and resumed her previous life as a narcissist from planet Hollywood where seeking publicity is a way of life.

They could have just left Great Britain and started their new life away from cameras, but the Hollywood diva and her Prince Charming couldn’t resist throwing a few insults at the Royal family and the British people on their way out of the door.

Meghan is entitled to her opinion on royal life and many would agree that it can be stifling at times, but she knew that before she joined and certainly knew it before she married into the firm.

Her assertion that getting away from the royal family was a ‘matter of life and death’ is typical hyperbole from a Hollywood diva whose raison d’etre is to be the center of attention and first in line for public exposure as opposed to sixth in line as she was with the Windsors.

To a narcissistic Hollywood diva, being sixth in line behind a commoner like the classy and popular Catherine, Duchess of Gloucester, must rankle to high heaven and too much for her ego to bear.

Being the generous souls that the British people are, Meghan’s attitude toward the royal family can be forgiven but the charge of racism she leveled against them cannot and shame on Harry for going along with it.

With the help of the agenda driven mainstream media, who are also embracing the ‘woke' culture, Harry and Meghan are now claiming that they were driven out of Great Britain by racism.

He could have made the accusation of racism before meeting Meghan and used his position to highlight it but it was only after their decision to leave the country that he went public with his belief that the British people were racist.  To mitigate his ludicrous statement Harry claims the British people are racist without knowing it. They are unconsciously racist.

In support of Meghan and Harry’s reason for leaving, an agenda driven ‘woke’ lecturer on race and ethnicity at Edgehill University on Merseyside, a Ms. Rachel Boyle, claimed hysterically on national television that …..”its racism. She’s a black woman and she’s been torn to pieces by the press”. One would think that a lecturer on race and ethnicity would know that Meghan Markle has a white father which makes her just as white as she is black.

Using Ms. Boyle's criteria Barack Obama is a white man along with the late reggae star, Bob Marley. It would also make Tiger Woods a Thai and Jimi Hendrix a Cherokee Indian. 

If anyone is going to indulge in identity politics in order to smear a nation it pays to do a little research first.

In the unpopularity stakes Sarah Ferguson, the former wife of Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, led the pack followed closely by Princess Michael of Kent.

The former was ridiculed and fat shamed as the Duchess of Pork due to her constant battle with the bulge and the latter christened Princess Pushy because of her overbearing persona. Both royals were torn apart by the media and both were white as driven snow.  

Accusing people of racism when they are not is bad enough but accusing an entire nation is a serious smear and an insult that should not go unchallenged.

Stirring up animosity and hatred toward white people by accusing them of racism, together with white supremacy and white privilege, is one of the foundations of the ‘woke’ culture and shame on Harry for embracing it at the behest of his brainwashed Hollywood wife.

One would think that Harry and Meghan would be the last people to be accusing others of privilege when one was part of the most elite family on the planet and the other an exclusively educated and pampered member of the Hollywood elite.

To conclude; it is worth noting that despite their abhorrence of white people, white supremacy and white privilege, Harry and Meghan have chosen to retire to white majority Canada instead of her ancestral home in black majority Nigeria where they would be spared touching shoulders with the people they despise so much.

Related articles:


Delingpole: #Megxit! Ex-Prince Harry Got Woke, Now He's Broke.


Kensington staff tells about Meghan tells about Meghan and Harry's time at the palace.


Prince Harry claims people are racist without even knowing it.

The Truth About White Slavery and The Myth of White Supremacy

David Lammy, the Member of Parliament for the London ghetto of Tottenham, is a vile racist who is totally obsessed with skin colour. He uses his black privilege and the two-tier criminal justice system to make pejorative, anti-white statements about the British people knowing he can get away with it without sanction.

He has incited violence against white people who cannot respond in kind because of his black privilege and the immunity given to him by the two-tier criminal justice system. The once respected protectors of law and order are now dedicated to imposing a politically correct agenda on behalf of the state. This includes shutting down any criticism of Lammy and his supporters with threats of prosecution and even imprisonment.

The following article will be considered as provocative and racist, but it is the truth and an indictment of the police, the media, political establishment and everyone else who allow Lammy to get away with hate speech and incitement to violence without sanction. It is also a challenge to these same people to stop pandering to racists like Lammy by returning the justice system to equality under law and treating Lammy as they would any other racist:

                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s not surprising when black politicians use their skin color to endear themselves to their black constituents in order to get re-elected and remain aboard the gravy train. At a time when false narratives, fake news and outright lying are employed by politicians in their election campaigns they are employing what they consider to be an acceptable practice.  

What is unforgivable and downright evil is for these black politicians to stir up racial hatred and violence against white people by claiming to be the victims of the long-abolished slave trade. Their outrageously false claim is that the legacy of slavery has perpetuated their victimhood which is manifested today by so-called white supremacy and white privilege of the host population.

Due to the rewriting of history, slavery is falsely portrayed as being exclusively perpetrated by white people forcibly removing black people from Africa to labour on the farms and plantations of America and the colonies.

Actual history has shown us that slavery is not exclusively white on black but endemic across the planet down the ages including the victors in war enslaving the vanquished. The Egyptians and Babylonians enslaved the Israelites, the Romans enslaved the British, the Turks enslaved the Greeks and so on and so forth.

More recently, the Nazi's enslaved the Jews and other unfavoured ethnic groups in purpose made concentration/extermination camps.

Even Africans were enslaving other Africans and selling them to Arabs and other slave traders prior to the arrival of Europeans. Slavery is still legal in many Islamic countries and in some other countries in the developing world to this day. 

The existence of white slaves and indentured labourers that could also be bought and sold in the slave markets is studiously ignored by Lammy and his ilk. Also ignored is the transportation to the colonies of debtors, petty criminals and those considered to be ‘undesirables’ to be used as slave labour by the British ruling class of the day.

Black politicians and their anti-white supporters also never mention the workhouses and debtors’ prisons that were nothing less than institutions of white slavery that persisted long after the slave trade was abolished in Great Britain and the colonies.

These black politicians are well aware that institutional white slavery existed, but they deliberately ignore it because it doesn’t fit with their white imposed victimhood narrative. They totally ignore the barons and serfdom which was white slavery that endured in Great Britain for centuries.

No student of British history could possibly argue that conditions in the coal mines, iron works and fabric mills during the British industrial revolution were infinitely worse than the cotton fields and sugar plantations of America and the colonies.

The same can be said for housing where the working classes lived in the most appalling vermin infested slums with little or no amenities as opposed to a wooden cabin on a plantation albeit a rudimentary structure.

The industry owners of the day were no better than slave masters who used the truck system of remuneration along with debt to keep their workers enslaved to their factories, coal mines, mills and foundries and wages at starvation levels.

It must be remembered that women and children also worked in the same appalling conditions in coal mines, iron works, mills and factories for long hours earning nothing more than a pittance. It was said at the time that the owners gave their employees just enough so that they would reproduce and supply another generation of cheap, enslaved workers. 

The continual verbal abuse of white British citizens by David Lammy MP and his fellow ingrates is not just divisive but it is stirring up racial hatred using rewritten history which makes it infinitely worse.

His constant accusations of white supremacy and white privilege needs to be countered before it becomes accepted as the established truth which will relegate the actual truth to the status of myth.

Lammy is a Labour MP so he should at least know something of the history of the British working class and the folklore of the Labour Movement he claims to represent. It is a history of deprivation, sacrifice and bloodshed exclusively suffered by the ancestors of the white people he now gratuitously insults.

In the Great Britain he hates because of the slave trade he should at least acknowledge the lengths the people went to in order to abolish it. This began with Somerset v Stewart in 1772 when slavery was proved to be unsupported in British law.

White people went on to abolish slavery by passing the Slave Trade Act in 1807 and led by abolitionist, William Wilberforce, white people abolished slavery once and for across the empire by passing the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833.

In addition to these legislative efforts, mill workers used their white privilege to get killed in the Peterloo massacre of 1819 while agitating for Parliamentary reform.

In the Merthyr Rising of 1831 white people rose up in insurrection after the Iron Masters refused to alleviate the appalling deprivation being suffered by the iron workers and coal miners. To set an example to the working class, coal miners leader, Richard Lewis, was falsely accused of stabbing a soldier and subsequently hanged. 

The white leaders of the Tollpuddle Martyrs were transported to the prison colony in Australia in 1834 for trying to form a trade union.

During the Chartist Uprising in Newport in 1839 white working-class people were massacred while agitating for Parliamentary reform. The leaders were sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered. Fortunately, the sentence was commuted to transportation to the prison colony in Australia.

The Jarrow Crusade in 1936 saw members of the working-class communities use their white privilege to march from Jarrow in the north of England to London in order to present a petition to Parliament protesting unemployment and poverty.

The freedoms and relative prosperity enjoyed by the British people today was won by the blood and sacrifice of a population that endured poverty and conditions that were worse than any plantation worker.

David Lammy’s parents took advantage of this sacrifice and voluntarily left their sun kissed Caribbean paradise to make their way to a cold, wet and windswept island in the north Atlantic with a ninety percent white population.

This is the same island and population that their son claims are racists and white supremacists whose sole mission in life is to use their white privilege to oppress Mr. Lammy and the black community presumably to make their lives intolerable.

Mr. Lammy was so oppressed and discriminated against by the white people of Great Britain that he availed himself of a first-class education. He was awarded a scholarship at the of age ten to attend a prestigious school founded by Henry VIII. He went on to study law at the University of London Law School and then to Harvard University in racist America. He was called to the bar at Lincolns Inn and practiced as a Barrister before becoming a Member of Parliament.

Not too bad for a country he claims uses institutional racism and intolerance to discriminate against black people to keep them confined to menial jobs in the ghetto.

According to the 2011 census, white British comprise 87.1% of the population so it’s obvious that they will be the dominant ethnic group and their way of life will take precedent over that of more recent arrivals. Black British comprise 3.0%, Indian British 2.3% and Chinese British 0.7%.

It is noticeable that the Indian and Chinese British communities combined also comprise 3% of the population but they don’t insult and smear the white British people despite being shipped to all corners of the empire like the Africans were.

It could be that the Indian and Chinese British are industrious, entrepreneurial, self-supporting, family orientated communities who take advantage of the opportunities Great Britain has to offer as opposed to wallowing in victimhood from a long-gone era while blaming white people and demanding reparations.

Looking at the state of the African nations that sold their fellow countrymen to the slave traders, David Lammy should be grateful that his ancestors were shipped to the colonies because he may not be the successful wealthy man he is today, he may not even have existed at all.

It is the view of many that his ancestors were not so much stolen from Africa but rescued. No one denies they suffered hardship but no worse than the ancestors of British white working class who were not responsible for slavery.  

The British people have no white privilege and they are not white supremacists. To insult and smear them as if they are white supremacists who were responsible for slavery serves only to stir up division and hatred which will not benefit his community, or any other community, should it descend into inter-communal animosity and violence.

I will conclude with the words of the great Mohammad Ali when asked about what he thought about Africa after he spent some time there preparing for his rumble in the jungle with George Foreman

“I’m glad my granddaddy got on that boat”.

Amen to that.


                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------


Previous and associated articles:


Labours' David Lammy 'fakes' race hate letters.


David Lammy - Black Privilege, White Hatred and Immunity.

Rachel Dolezal - Joining Al Jolson Down The Swanee River

Just when you think that the 'progressive' left has reached the peak of their imbecility, along comes Rachel Dolezal, a white girl pretending to be black, to prove us all wrong. The behavior of this sad excuse for a human being has not just taken self loathing to a whole new level, she's taken it into the stratosphere.

Putting hilarity to one side it's worth looking at this issue in a little more detail in order to ascertain whether white people blacking up and pretending to be black people involves any wider implications.

I was aware of the 'white privilege' group of self loathers who believe that all white people are advantaged from birth due to their skin colour while ignoring widespread white poverty along with the fact that the highest offices in the USA have been occupied by black people. I was not aware however that there was a 'WrongSkin' affliction whereby some sad individuals who are white by birth and heritage identify themselves as black and therefore claim they are born in the wrong skin.

There is also the issue of legality, whereby due to the obsession with race and affirmative action in the USA, pretending to be from an ethnic minority or black can bear dividends. Many lucrative positions and scholarships are reserved for ethnic minorities and blacks where the qualifying requirements are sometimes relaxed in order to meet quotas.

It is asserted that Massachusetts Senator and possible Presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren broke the law when she lied about her Native American heritage in order to secure a lucrative position at Harvard University on the basis of her minority status and being a person of colour.  Given the moniker 'Fauxcahontas' or 'Liawatha' her claim is based on a picture of her supposed great-great grandfather having high cheekbones and a cookbook with the demeaning title of Pow Wow Chow.


Despite being an absolute phony, Rachel Dolezal has secured a position as a part time professor for Africana Studies at Washington University in addition to a position as a civil rights activist with the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (NAACP). Although the organisation appears to have given her a green light, real black people are justifiably offended by her fakery.

The sad thing about this issue is the realisation of just how far the 'progressive' left have dragged America's reputation into the arena of wackiness and stupidity.

The Rachel Dolezal racial fakery, the obsession with sexuality and gender along with the global ballyhoo surrounding the fundamental transformation of Bruce Jenner into Caitlyn, the once respected United States of America has become the laughing stock of the world.

On a lighter side, the approval given by the NAACP to Rachel Dolezal adopting a black persona has afforded the world an opportunity to reverse some of the more risible aspects of political correctness and it can start with the rehabilitation of Al Jolson and other minstrels as part of Vaudeville and harmless light entertainment.

Nobody should be offended by a re-release of The Swanee Ribber with Rachel Dolezal's voice added to that of Al Jolson and in Great Britain re-runs of the immensely popular Black and White Minstrel Show can now be shown without causing offence.

Born-in-the-WrongSkin Michael Jackson, a sort of Al Jolson in reverse, certainly started something when he made colour change acceptable.