Churchill and The Iron Lady Are Rolling In Their Graves

Embarrassing doesn't begin to describe the state of the British government. The Premiership of Theresa May has been an unmitigated disaster which has turned a once proud nation into an international laughing stock.

Her amateurish attempt to keep Great Britain locked inside the European Union while pretending to implement the result of the Brexit referendum has not only exposed her own deceit but also exposed the entire Parliament for the treacherous rabble of lowlifes they are.

The great Brexit betrayal and Trump style rallies have propelled Nigel Farage and his newly minted Brexit Party to the top of the polls for the coming European elections leaving the establishment legacy parties floundering in their wake.

The launch of the Conservative Party's campaign for the coming European elections was a total humiliation that should have triggered the immediate sacking of the hapless May.

Cowardice is now the hallmark of the Conservative Party leadership so she remains in place to finally consign the once great party into the dustbin of history. .

Mrs. May's launch of the campaign is perfectly encapsulated by the photograph above. The utter dejection on the faces of May and her candidates speaks volumes.

In contrast to the well organized upbeat launch of the Brexit Party,  Mrs. May's choreographed three minutes long launch was attended by two cameramen, a still photographer and a journalist who was allowed to ask a single question before the hapless Mrs. May walked off.

One could never imagine Winston Churchill or the Iron Lady subjecting themselves to such public humiliation but such is the state of British politics and the dire lack of leadership talent.

Mrs. May is finished, her Premiership is all but over so it's pitiful to watch her pretending she is in control while her friends and colleagues circle like vultures waiting to alight on the corpse of her political career.

The race to replace her is an undignified public scramble which is only adding to her humiliation. It's the modern equivalent of being bombarded with rotten vegetables while locked in the stocks on some village green.

Of the talentless shower scrambling to replace her, only the bumbling Boris Johnson has any profile and that's hardly inspiring but in the land of the blind the one-eyed man is King.               

 
May launches Tory EU election campaign 

Winston Churchill Would Be Banned From Speaking In Today's America

When Berkley’s KPFA Radio cancelled an appearance by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins for ‘hurtful speech against Islam’ the United States joined Great Britain and the rest of Europe by censoring any remarks about the so-called religion of peace no matter how minor or truthful.

Apart from his work in the field of evolutionary science and other disciplines, Dawkins is more renowned for his atheism and his criticism of all religions particularly Christianity. He has had many high profile clashes with the Roman Catholic Church and uses language during his discourse which has offended and hurt billions of Christians around the world.

The fact that KPFA were prepared to host Mr. Dawkins regardless of his attacks on Christianity renders their claim that they do not endorse hurtful speech risible as well as grossly hypocritical. What they really mean is that they will ignore hurtful speech against Christianity but they will not countenance any criticism of Islam. (Read the story here)

This is in line with the rest of the main stream media (MSM) that is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the ruling elite who are intent on forcing acceptance of Islam in the western world using censorship and threats by labelling any criticism of Islam as hate speech.

Shamefully, this brings the United States into line with Great Britain and the rest Europe who have virtually banned any criticism of Islam and use so-called ‘hate crimes’ to intimidate people into silence. The highly politicized British police ‘service’ are using their supposedly scarce resources to monitor social media such as Twitter and Facebook looking for ‘Islamophobic’ comments to which they boast they have zero tolerance.

This is the same police 'service' that arrested the leader of the Liberty GB Party, Paul Weston, for quoting Sir Winston Churchill in a speech during his election campaign for the European Parliament. (See here)

The words used by Richard Dawkins which resulted in his censorship were mild by comparison to the observations made by Sir Winston Churchill in his book, “The River War” that resulted in Mr. Weston's arrest.

These were observations Churchill made from first-hand experience while serving as an officer in the British Army during the Boer War.

Who could deny the veracity of his words or the fact that they are as relevant today as they were back then.  

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

― Winston S. Churchill, The River War

This paragraph alone would result in Great Britain’s war time Prime Minister being labelled as an Islamophobe and banned not only from an insignificant radio station in Berkley but the entire MSM in the USA.

When then Prime Minister Churchill was invited in May 1946 by President Harry S. Truman to make a post war speech in Fulton, Missouri, he laid bare the intentions of Stalin and communist Russia at a time when negative talk about the wartime ally was all but forbidden.

His Sinews of Peace speech, better known as the Iron Curtain speech, correctly predicted the expansionist plans of Stalin in Europe and the resultant cold war. (Watch it here)

He was accused of war mongering and castigated for insulting a wartime ally who was instrumental in the defeat of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazi’s).

Churchill was right in his assessment of Stalin and his communist party just as he was right about the nature of Islam. Like Richard Dawkins, in modern politically correct America, the great man would most likely be censored if he was invited at all.

In conclusion, for the attention of Antifa and the rest of the George Soros sponsored cadres of socialist  juveniles, Sir Winston made his speech at Westminster College in Fulton Missouri. The site contains a relocated church that was bombed during the London Blitz and a superb Churchill museum marking the occasion of his speech. Outside stands an imposing statue of the great man which I am sure triggers many a snowflake as they pass by.

In line with your current behavior it is your duty to don your masks, tool up and knock the place down then convince yourself that Islam is a religion of peace and Winston Churchill was never there.  

Brexit Hero Censured Then Treated The Offending Bureaucrat With Contempt

Nothing can lighten the heart of abused patriots more than watching one of their elected representatives publicly treat one of the most powerful European Union bureaucrats with complete and utter contempt. What gives it even more satisfaction is that he did it using an article of scorn introduced into popular usage by Winston Churchill, arguably Great Britain's most loved and greatest Prime Minister.

When Brexit hero Nigel Farage referred to two leading Europhile Members of the British Parliament as 'quislings'  and the 'high priests of European federalism' he was censured by the odious German socialist, Martin Schultz who, when he's not putting his visceral hatred for Great Britain on public display, is the unelected President of the phony European Parliament.

What made matters infinitely worse for 'President' Schultz was that Farage had the temerity to make his charge of treachery at the very heart of his power, i.e. the chamber of the European Parliament. As usual Farage and his small band of fellow Brexiteers was outnumbered and surrounded on all sides by his enemies and the enemies of freedom. (See the whole episode here)

Anti-Great Britain fanatics Nick Clegg and 'Red' Ed Miliband are the former leaders of the Liberal Democrats and Far-left Labour Party respectively. They both resigned their positions after being rejected by the British people at the last general election but they remain Members of Parliament.

The article of scorn was named after Norwegian traitor, Vidkun Quisling, who surrendered his country's sovereignty to Germany during World War II then governed Norway on behalf of the National Socialist German Workers Party until their defeat by the Allies.

Despite the overwhelming vote for Brexit, Miliband and Clegg are still actively campaigning for what is left of British sovereignty to be surrendered to the German dominated European Union with themselves in the Westminster Parliament governing Great Britain on behalf of the mentally unstable German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.

In modern usage 'quisling' is used in reference to people who's loyalty is not to their native country but to an occupying force or to a foreign entity with which they actively and willingly collaborate to subvert the nation. Therefore the use of 'quisling' for Messrs. Clegg and Miliband is accurate and wholly appropriate.

Nobody could deliver scorn quite like Winston Churchill and he did it with particular venom when he addressed the allied delegates in June 1941:

"A vile race of Quislings - to use a new word which will carry the scorn of mankind down the centuries - is hired to fawn upon the conqueror, to collaborate in his designs and to force his rule upon their fellow countrymen while grovelling low themselves. Such is the plight of once glorious Europe".

As potent as they are, words alone cannot convey the complete, utter and absolute contempt Churchill held for those who would surrender their countries' sovereignty to a foreign entity and then collaborate with that same entity to rule the subject people on its behalf.

Freedom lovers and British patriots take heart, boost your morale and listen to the great man deliver the speech here

Churchill used it again when he addressed both Houses of Congress in December 1941 after America entered the war:

"Hope has returned to the hearts of scores of millions of men and women, and with that hope there burns a flame of anger against the brutal corrupt invader. And still more fiercely burn the fires of hatred and contempt for the filthy Quislings whom he has suborned".

These words of contempt and scorn are as fitting today as they were when they were delivered by Winston Churchill back in 1941. They describe accurately the treacherous Clegg, Miliband and a host of other prominent people and celebrities who are indeed 'hired to fawn upon the conqueror and to collaborate in their designs to force their rule upon their fellow countrymen while grovelling low themselves'.

Shame on them and curse on all their houses. They are insulting our 'Glorious Dead' with their treachery and they have surrendered the right to call themselves British.

* For the record, after the war Vidkun Quisling suffered the fate that all traitors should suffer, he was tried for murder and high treason, found guilty then put up against a wall and shot by firing squad.