UN Global Forum On Migration and Development- A Correction and Apology

Apropos a previous article on the death of the evil monster Peter Sutherland, the father of globalism and the architect of the immigration disaster that has engulfed Europe. (See here)

Included in the article was the fact that Sutherland was delegated by the UN to lead the Global Forum on Migration and Development. A taxpayer funded talking shop supposedly formed to help nations understand the link between migration and development.

The narrative that the UN/EU is trying to create with this forum is that mass migration from the backward, undeveloped world is essential for continued growth and development in the already developed world.

My contention in the article was that this is false and that there is no link between mass migration and development. I argued that the opposite was true, the mass immigration we see today in Europe, the United States and the rest of the Judaeo-Christian world is a demographic, cultural and economic disaster for the people.

(This excludes the big business fat cats who get an endless supply of cheap labor but I digress)

As a result of this mass migration the working and middle classes have seen their living standards decrease and their lives blighted by violent crime, rape and mass murder as their countries are turned into replicas of the third world basket cases the migrants left behind.

I offer an apology to one and all because I was not entirely correct in my assertion; history has demonstrated that there is indeed a link between mass migration and development that spread the advantages of civilization to the remotest corners of the planet.

The Americas, Africa and the Middle East were resource rich countries populated by uncivilized, violent savages barely out of the stone age until the mass migration of Europeans developed those resources creating dynamic economies and bringing all the advantages of the civilizations they left behind.

The advantages that this migration brought to the undeveloped world are denied by the UN/EU globalists and the societies that were engendered by this migration were demonized and eventually brought down. This is especially the case in Africa where those responsible for development were removed from power condemning the natives to poverty, hunger, disease and violent repression under ruthless dictators.

It is an irrefutable fact that when the civilizing influence was removed by the UN/EU globalists the native populations reverted back to their pre-migration state made worse by the availability of modern technology including weaponry.

Despite the transfer of technology and industrial capacity organized by the UN agency UNIDO along with the trillions of dollars dispensed as development aid, the third world has failed to catch up with the developed nations. ( UNIDO global transfer of wealth program here, here and here)

This leads to the obvious conclusion that the people of these backward nations do not possess the skills necessary to govern a country and run a successful economy and the indications are that they never will.

There are exceptions with India being the most visible. India embraced western civilization and made use of the educational opportunities afforded to them by the British. The educated middle class did possess the skills necessary to govern and run a successful economy and they left most of the government infrastructure and institutions intact after the British departed.

Having dispensed with the socialism and rampant corruption of the post-independence Indira Gandhi years, India is now thriving with a rapidly expanding middle class. India is now renown for expertise in the Information Technology field with its very own Silicon Valley. Inroads are being made into the high levels of poverty and the latent corruption which still blights India and it will take some time yet before both are eliminated.

One has to compare India with its neighbors and former compatriots Pakistan and Bangladesh. They chose not to embrace the civilization and institutions left behind by the British and are now wallowing in abject poverty, disease, hunger and Islamofascism.

In conclusion: I concede that there is indeed a link between migration and development but not as the UN/EU globalists would have you believe.

Regardless of the false narrative being disseminated by UN/EU propaganda, recent experience in both Europe, America and the Judaeo-Christian world has demonstrated that far from being essential for their further growth and development the mass influx of people from the undeveloped world has had the opposite effect.

As a result of the dramatic increase in demand for welfare benefits, housing, healthcare, education and a plethora of other taxpayer funded public services, economies are stagnating and living standards falling with the added disaster of national homogeneity and social cohesion being torn asunder by the influx of backward, incompatible cultures.

The Architect Of The EU Immigration Disaster Kicks The Bucket

There was much weeping and wailing in the gilded halls of the global elite recently as they mourned the mortal coil shuffling of Peter Sutherland, one of their most senior and revered members.

Known as the father of globalism, the term ‘faceless bureaucrat’ doesn’t begin to describe this fanatic who is the man largely responsible for the economic and cultural destruction of EU basket cases such as Greece, Sweden and Italy along with his native Ireland.

The cultural and demographic disaster engulfing Europe from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean Sea and from the Atlantic Ocean to the Balkans is the result of this globalists’ total commitment to destroying the ancient cultures of Europe using mass immigration and replacing them with so-called multi-cultural societies.

He always used the term ‘destroying national homogeneity’ when referring to this cultural replacement agenda which is a politically correct term for what can only be described as ethnic cleansing.

The achievements of this monster of which he was most proud include the descent of Sweden into third world mediocrity and the rape capital of the world. Likewise his native Ireland, areas of which resemble Lagos or Mogadishu instead of the Emerald Isle we know and love.

The mass sexual assaults and mass murder of innocents by Muslim jihadists which is rampant in Europe, including the more advanced countries such as France, Germany and Great Britain, are the result of Peter Sutherland’s fanatical dedication to imposing multi-culturalism using mass immigration from the backward, uncivilised world.

The malign power and influence of the global elite is highlighted by the fact that Peter Sutherland held enormous power over the Presidents and Prime Ministers of Europe; the policies he advocated destroyed entire countries and the lives of hundreds of millions of people and yet he was never elected to anything via the ballot box in his entire life.

Such was his remoteness from the real world, his soulless carcass will be sent on its way unmourned by the ordinary people of Europe who’s lives and countries have been destroyed by the malignant ideology of this evil globalist fanatic and his ilk.

In line with the standard practice of the global elite, the word ‘appointed’ dominated the curriculum vitae of this powerful yet unaccountable bureaucrat.

His career as an international 'political fixer' was stellar and began when he was ‘appointed’ Attorney General of Ireland. A committed believer in replacing the independent nation states of Europe with a single, borderless, superstate he was then ‘appointed’ as a European Commissioner in the corrupt EU Commission of Jacques Delores.

European Commissioner is a powerful position which serves as a conduit for multi-national enterprises, big banks, international corporations and the UN to control the phony European Parliament and implement policies that imposes the new world order they have planned.

Other ‘appointments’ in the international banking, industrial and education sectors followed thick and fast for Sutherland including:

Allied Irish Banks, Goldman Sachs, Royal Bank of Scotland, BP, ABB and the London School of Economics etc.

With a CV like this it was inevitable that Sutherland would be a believer and advocate of a New World Order comprising of a single, borderless, egalitarian world governed by the likes of him and his ilk.

Hence his ‘appointment’ to the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization before being ‘appointed’ as the UN Special Representative for Migration.

Sutherland and the rest of the global elite are divorced from reality believing only what they want to believe while ignoring the disastrous consequences of their actions.

An example of this disconnect is his ‘appointment’ to the Global Forum on Migration and Development which promotes international dialogue on the positive link between migration and development.

The link between migration and development in Europe and the western world has been an unmitigated disaster with no resultant development whatsoever. In fact, as the whole world can see, this mass migration has had the opposite effect by reducing the host countries, both economically and culturally, into replicas of the backward third world countries the migrants left behind.

Any development or economic improvement that has been achieved is by the efforts of the indigenous population despite the degenerative influence of millions of backward economic migrants.   

Despite the evidence before their eyes Sutherland and his fellow elites refuse to acknowledge this fact because it conflicts with their globalist agenda.

It must be noted that the Sutherland's’ lectures on ‘destroying national homogeneity’ and the creation of mythical ‘multi-cultural societies ‘applied only to Europe and the western world. While he toured the capitals of Europe advocating the abolition of borders and the free movement of peoples, he never delivered the same lecture in Saudi Arabia or any other Arab country in Middle East.

His lecture tour also omitted China, North and South Korea, Africa, India, Pakistan, Indonesia etc. In fact if Europeans migrated in large numbers into Africa in order to 'destroy national homogeneity' and create a multi-cultural societies they would be derided as white imperialists or exploiting colonists by the likes of Sutherland and his ilk.

In conclusion, the globalists have lost one of their founders and favorite sons but notwithstanding the efforts of President Trump and Brexit, their destructive agenda will roll relentlessly onward regardless of the damage it will do to western civilization, global prosperity, security and peace.


Related Articles:


Death of Peter Sutherland, Mass Migration Advocate Dubbed 'The Father of Globalization


UN: EU must destroy homogeneity of member states through immigration


Sweden Deploys An Army Of Bureaucrats To Sign Up Migrants To State Welfare


UNHCR - joint statement on Mediterranean crossings 

Genocide - Europe Will Be Diverse Says EU Bureaucrat

As the people of the world are witnessing with their own eyes the nation states of Europe are being irrevocably changed for the worse and their Judeo-Christian cultures slowly erased by open border mass immigration. What the world may not know however, is that this is not the result of civil wars or compassion toward refugees fleeing for their lives.

In a rare fit of candour out of character with the usual pre-programmed propaganda from EU bureaucrats, the Vice-President of the European Commission, Frans Timmemans, has confirmed what informed people knew already; that this is part of a long planned agenda to erase the centuries old civilizations of the nation states of Europe, along with their white Judeo-Christian cultures, replacing them with so called 'multi-cultural societies'.

"There is not going to be, even in the remotest places on the planet, a nation that will not see diversity in it's future", says Mr. Timmermans.

To remove any ambiguity he goes further:

"Europe will be diverse, like all other parts of the world will be diverse".

It couldn't be better articulated that this is part of the long planned UN agenda for the entire planet including the United States of America.

Listening to Mr. Timmermans speech and reading the transcript puts the current actions of German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the British Prime Minister, David Cameron and the rest of the EU into perspective. More importantly for the American people it puts the actions, and lack of action in some instances, of the Obama administration and the US Congress into perspective.

Now the American people will know why their politicians refuse to control the borders, why they refuse not only to deport illegal immigrants but actively encourage more of them with all the benefit entitlements and constitutional protections that are available to legal residents and citizens.

It should also help them to understand why their political leaders continue to insist on mass immigration from the undeveloped world, including hot spots like the middle east and Africa, even though some immigrants from these places are a clear and present danger to the people.

It also goes some way to explaining why American blue collar workers are being replaced by imported counterparts from the third world using the H1B visa system. It's not just cheap labour and corporate profits at play here.

Now they should know why President Obama and the US Congress continue with the 'nation of immigrants' narrative and continue to redefine American values and who they are as a people.

Frans Timmermans is not just any politician from a fringe party shouting on the sidelines to get attention for an extreme agenda; he is the Vice-President of the European Union who wields immense power over 500 million people. By virtue of the fact that he was appointed and cannot be removed by popular vote the power he wields is absolute and cannot be challenged.

 If this speech was made by any other politician outside the global political elite all hell would break loose. The media would indulge in a frenzy of name calling and labeling with all the favourites being thrown around with abandon. Racist, Fascist, Bigot and Nazi would return as household words, with the words holocaust, 'cattle trucks' and 'gas chambers' being employed to embellish the mental images further.

See Timmermans here and read the full transcript here

Frans Timmermans is not acting in isolation of course; the fingerprints of the UN de facto world government are all over it.

In October 2010 German Chancellor, Angela Merkel made a speech to her Christian Democratic Union Party highlighting the fact that attempts by the state to impose multi-culturalism onto the German people had "utterly failed'. (See here)

Likewise, in February 2011 British Prime Minister David Cameron made a speech to the Munich Security Conference highlighting the fact that attempts by the state to impose multi-culturalism on the British people had failed. (See here)

In complete contrast to this Cameron stated in response to accusations that Great Britain is infested with semi-autonomous Muslim ghettos governed by sharia law that "Britain is one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-faith, multi-ethnic countries in the world".

So what happened to change their minds so quickly and so dramatically?

In 2012, the UN Special Representative for Migration, Peter Sutherland, made a tour of European legislatures, including the Westminster Parliament, reiterating the UN policy of cultural replacement for the white Judeo-Christian countries of Europe. The representative of the UN global elite spoke and the European political class obeyed to the letter. (See here)

(If there is ever a competition for the most evil, destructive men on the planet, Timmermans and Sutherland would be top contenders.)

As the world has witnessed after Sutherland's intervention, Great Britain, Germany and the rest of the EU opened their borders to even more millions of third world economic migrants, including young male Muslims who have proceeded to sexually assault, rape and murder western women and young boys without serious interference from the governments involved.

Indeed the various EU governments are now censoring news of these heinous crimes and continuing to insist that it's nothing to do with Islam or the economic migrants from the undeveloped world inorder to prevent a backlash. Aiding and abetting these governments are compliant social media giants, such as Facebook and Twitter.

It must be noted that this agenda to impose diversity by the UN/EU political elite is the deliberate destruction of the centuries old white Judeo-Christian cultures of the world and their replacement with alien cultures is classed as genocide according to the UN's own criteria.

Furthermore, in conclusion, this genocide is being imposed by unelected, professional bureaucrats such as Timmermans and Sutherland who cannot be removed from office by the people who will be most affected by this disaster without consultation and without their consent.

H/T WHITEGENOCIDEPROJECT.com

The UN And Cultural Genocide - The Puppet And The Puppet Master

Let's be clear and unequivocal from the outset, an integral part of the post war reordering of the planet by both the United Nations and the European Union includes the removal from power and influence of predominately white people who share a Judeo-Christian heritage.

It should be obvious by now that the so called refugee crisis which has dominated the global bought-and-paid-for media has been long in planning; it has been brilliantly coordinated and flawlessly executed.

This mass influx of third world, mainly Muslim, economic migrants into Europe combined with imposed quotas for each country guarantees that the generational project to replace the individual cultures of the European nation states, along with their Judeo-Christian heritages, with artificially constructed 'multi-cultural societies' will pass the tipping point and become irreversible. 

Even now as the truth emerges that only one in five of those swarming into Europe are refugees fleeing the Syrian civil war - the rest being economic migrants from a variety of countries and continents including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Africa - they persist with calling it 'the refugee crisis'.

One only has to follow the agenda of the de facto world government at the UN, along with its European subsidiary in Brussels, to see this tragedy for what it is. It also reveals the callousness and the fanaticism of the key players along with the depths they will plummet to achieve their goal.

The UN/EU bureaucrats and their propaganda machine use the politically correct term of 'unhomogenising' to describe their cultural replacement agenda. To that end they dispatched their super bureaucrat and senior Bilderberger, Peter Sutherland, to tour the capitals and legislatures of Europe advising the various political establishments to "undermine national homogeneity".
(See here)

Even by the UN's own criteria this undermining of national homogeneity is in fact cultural genocide, at least within the spirit of its Articles and Declarations.
(See here)

Great Britain's Prime Minister, David Cameron, is the archetypal modern politician. He possesses all the attributes he needs to deceive enough of the electorate into believing he represents their interests and can be trusted with their safety and well being.

In actuality Cameron is a self confessed 'progressive' who is totally dedicated to the UN and the EU, along with their cultural replacement agenda. He represents the UN and the EU in the Westminster Parliament, not the British people.

When UN or EU bureaucrats make any demand on Cameron, whether it be increased contributions, an increase in immigrant quotas or welfare entitlement policy, he makes an initial high visibility pretence at being tough for the benefit of his home audience before quietly complying at some later date.

Instead of asking the obvious questions regarding the unhomogenising propaganda of Peter Sutherland and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Cameron merely repeats their nonsense, almost by rote.

( David Cameron on unhomogenising here)

Sutherland and the UN/EU propaganda machine push the line that the future progress, security and and prosperity of the British people, and those of the other European nation states, is being hindered by their lack of diversity and their homogeneous, mono-cultural societies.

This justification for cultural genocide of the nations that advanced civilisation from the dark ages to the modern world, raises multiple questions that need to be addressed by Ban Ki-moon, Peter Sutherland, David Cameron along with all the other advocates of the UN/EU cultural replacement agenda.

If progress, security and prosperity is impossible to achieve in the homogeneous, mono-cultural nations of Europe, how is it that the same doesn't apply to homogeneous, mono-cultural nations such as Japan, China, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Ban Ki-moon's own country of South Korea?

Also, if these same immigrants are essential for the future prosperity of the developed world, how is it that their home countries have not progressed but remain backwards and undeveloped?

It is now universally accepted that imposed multi-culturalism using open border mass immigration has been a complete and utter disaster for the peoples of Great Britain and Europe. Cameron, Sutherland et al, need to explain how tens of thousands of impoverished, crime ridden, welfare funded, mono-cultural ghettos, with their violent turf wars could possibly be vital for the security or the future prosperity of the European people?

How can the barbaric customs of incompatible, backward cultures from the undeveloped, uncivilised world add anything to western civilisation let alone guarantee their future security and prosperity?

How can importing female genital mutilation, paedophilia, incest, child marriage, honour killings, spousal abuse, homophobia, beheading and mutilation complement British or European culture?

How can Sharia law or the violent exhortations to dominate all other cultures, as written in the Koran, be compatible with the European people, their way of life or their Judeo-Christian heritage?

They are obviously not compatible and never will be therefore the UN/EU elites have decided, without consultation, that Islam will gradually supersede the Judeo-Christian heritages of Europe as part of their cultural replacement agenda.
(Listen to David Cameron on Islamification here)

If, as the UN and the EU claim, that this is a humanitarian crisis of Biblical proportions, why is it that the burden is being put solely on the people of Europe and the Anglosphere to take the brunt of it?

Admittedly it was exacerbated by western interference, but this remains a Middle Eastern problem concerning mainly people of the Muslim faith, therefore why aren't the oil rich countries of the Middle East, including the Gulf States, dealing with it or at the very least alleviating the suffering of their coreligionists?

Why is the UN's Ban Ki-moon putting pressure on Europe and not the rest of the nations that make up his organisation to take their 'fair share' of refugees?

Why is Saudi Arabia offering to fund mosque building in Germany and Europe but refusing to take their fair share of immigrants or to fund their rehabilitation in Europe?

The answers are blindingly obvious; the cultural genocide by mass immigration being imposed by the UN/EU has caused opposition to the European project putting it's continuation at risk. The lack of democratic means to address this disaster has seen an increase in violence and the rise of patriotic and nationalist parties.

This threat to their generational project was viewed with horror by the UN/EU elites with the distinct possibility that their prize could be lost at this late stage. Something needed to be done to push cultural replacement past the tipping point and what better way was there than opening the borders to all and sundry.

The usual tactic of demonisation and smear is being deployed with venom against any person or party that questions or opposes this cultural genocide and open border mass immigration. The rising tide of opposition is being labelled as the rise of the 'far right' and adherents are smeared as bigots, fascists, xenophobes and Islamophobes along with the overused but predictable favourite 'racist'.

Everyone outside of the agenda driven, global 'progressive' establishment, along with their collaborators in the media and the self loathing community, see this crisis for what it is; a deliberate and final push by the UN/EU to replace the successful, centuries old Judeo-Christian cultures of Great Britain and Europe while downgrading the standards of civilisation with the intention of finalising their project to impose the equality of nations and cultures.

Refugee 'Crisis' - UN Bigwigs Break Cover To Assist The EU Power Grab

The infamous quote "never let a crisis go to waste" has been attributed to various political players including Sir Winston Churchill, anti-American revolutionary Saul Alinsky and latterly Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel when he was an integral part of the Obama political machine. Whatever the context they used, the interpretation is unambiguous; any crisis, no matter how small or what it is, can be used to gain political advantage or to advance a particular cause.

The current so called 'crisis' involving refugees, whether it is genuine or deliberately engineered, will not go to waste by either the European Union ruling bureaucrats or their masters at the UN de facto world government in New York.

Unelected EU President, Jean Claude Junker, is milking it for all it's worth in order to accumulate more power over the individual states especially concerning control over their borders. Not only is he imposing refugee quotas on the individual states using something called  the Common Asylum Policy, he is unilaterally changing international law by altering the criteria which defines refugee status.

This is draconian even for an unelected dictator like Junker. Anyone looking for work will now be considered as a refugee as opposed to someone fleeing war or persecution. This act alone opens the borders to practically the whole world.

The action by Junker is most likely to counter the fact that a person's status changes from refugee to economic migrant the moment they voluntarily cross a border from a safe haven country as most of these migrants have done from Turkey, Greece, Cyprus and Italy. It would be illegal for genuine refugees to proceed further without registration in the first safe country.

This unauthorised movement across borders would have the effect of re-defining and downgrading the so-called 'refugee crisis' into one of economic migration and welfare colonialism.

Add the redefinition of refugee status to President Junker's intention to use the state of individual economies for quota allocation, Great Britain will be in his cross-hairs by virtue of its economy being not quite as bankrupt as Greece or the other EU members outside of Germany. Junker's personal hatred of Great Britain and its people will guarantee a quota far exceeding that of which it is capable of absorbing.

With the serial appeaser David Cameron as their Prime Minister, the British people had better prepare themselves for yet another deluge of economic migrants and welfare colonists.

In his usual attempt to appear tough before the people, Prime Minister, David Cameron stated that Great Britain will not be subject to the Common Asylum Policy or Junker's quota's and announced that he would accept five thousand Syrian refugees directly from camps in Lebanon.

After an application of pressure from President Junker, along with that of German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, the Labour Party, the tedious professional do-gooder Bob Geldof and a selection of other British celebrities, David Cameron caved in within hours with a subsequent announcement that Great Britain will now be accepting twenty thousand immigrants for starters.


Incidentally, one celebrity has past form with regard to Syrian refugees; the notorious champagne socialist Emma Thompson has led another protest to the Prime Minister demanding an increase in the numbers of Syrians admitted into Great Britain.

This is the same Emma Thompson that protested against the building of a Tesco grocery store near her residence because it would 'alter its village atmosphere' along with the horrific prospect that 'the underpaid Tesco staff would not fit it with the local residents'.
( See here and here)

If the British people have reason to worry that they are about to suffer another deluge of economic migrants then this would be further justified by the intervention of the UN in the form of its Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon and his malevolent enforcer Peter Sutherland.

Judging by the attitude and actions of both the EU and the UN toward the British people, their culture, their Judeo-Christian heritage and their way of life it is plainly obvious that these institutions and their leaders are determined to bring about their erasure and their replacement with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

In what is becoming a mantra similar to taxing the the rich, both the UN and the EU demand that everyone should take their 'fair share' of Syrian immigrants. In an interview with British television Ban Ki-moon is arguing that Great Britain 'should do much more' to alleviate the 'refugee crisis'.

He is deliberately ignoring the fact that Great Britain has been changed beyond recognition by a population increase of eight million since Tony Blair obeyed the UN and EU bureaucrats and opened the borders to mass immigration in 1997.

That's 8,000,000 consisting mainly of immigrants and their offspring from the undeveloped and uncivilised world. Although this has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and their way of life, it has progressed the UN/EU agenda of replacing Great Britain's culture, heritage and way of life with a mythical 'multi-cultural society' by leaps and bounds.

Does the influx of six hundred and thirty-six thousand immigrants (636,000) last year alone constitute a fair share?

A thoroughly evil piece of work, Peter Sutherland is Ban Ki-moon's Special Representative for Migration. He is a life-long super bureaucrat who was also a former unelected European Union Commissioner, the former Director General of GATT then the WTO. He is currently Chairman of Goldman-Sachs International and the London School of Economics.

Sutherland is totally committed to the replacement of British culture and its Judeo-Christian heritage and he works tirelessly to bring it about. He has toured the capitals of Europe and addressed the British Parliament, and also the obsessively secret Bilderberg group, preaching his destructive message. He has even appeared on the BBC to urge the EU leaders to 'undermine national homogeneinty'.
(See here and here)

According to this monster the future of Great Britain and Europe depends on them replacing their cultures with 'multi-cultural societies'; how they became some of the greatest, civilised nations on earth before the influx of incompatible economic migrants and welfare colonists he doesn't explain.

Both Ban Ki-moon and Peter Sutherland need to explain the contradiction of why the great civilisations of Great Britain and Europe must erase their cultures to survive when Ban Ki-moon's native South Korea is the most homogeneous nation on the planet while at the same time being one of the most prosperous.

They also need to explain how many refugees from the current 'crisis' will be journeying to South Korea. Likewise the homogeneous countries of Japan, China, Saudi Arabia etc.

In conclusion: it must be accepted that both the EU and the UN are using this so called 'crisis' to further their agendas which consist of replacing the cultures and Judeo-Christian heritage in Europe to facilitate the creation of a generic European citizen and for the UN to create an egalitarian planet based on equality of nations, cultures and people.

Engineering England's Fall - The Enemy Within

It's a worthwhile exercise to occasionally leave familiar territory to ascertain whether certain areas of the country are as one perceives them to be in order to confirm that ones interpretation of current affairs are based on reality as opposed to unjustified prejudices.

With this in mind I found myself far from home standing before the alter in a church dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury in a small village in the county of Devonshire, South West England.

The village is quintessentially rural England where history seeps from every stone and where every stained glass window in the ancient church tells a story. The site has been a place of worship since Saxon times where the base of the original Saxon cross can be found in the graveyard behind the war memorial.

The reason why this tiny church is relevant today is not only because it remains an active place of worship and facilitates the continuation of the ancient tradition of bell ringing, it's construction and dedication is due to one of the most notable episodes in English history. The murder of the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, in 1170 by knights loyal to King Henry II. They carried out their dastardly act under the false impression King Henry actually wanted to be rid of "this troublesome priest" on a permanent basis.

It is this long embedded history and tradition which will eventually attract the attention of the metropolitan 'progressive' elite and put the English identity of this village in serious jeopardy.

Current events and the actions of the British establishment have proved beyond the shadow of doubt that they are totally committed to replacing England's culture and way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society' and to this end they have packed Great Britain's institutions and the machinery of state with like minded agents equally committed to England's fall.

Evidence of this ongoing treachery abounds but one recent incident should be enough to convince even the most sceptical of readers of its veracity.

When government inspectors descended upon Market Rason Primary School in rural Lincolnshire they refused to award the top grade despite the high academic achievement because the school was too English or not 'multi-cultural' enough. (Read the appalling story here and here)

The fact that the catchment area is ninety seven percent 'White English' didn't appear to be relevant in their assessment but it speaks volumes about the animosity toward traditional England and the English way of life by these government agents.

When one takes into account that every government department, including the civil service and every institution from the NHS to the BBC, the police, the judiciary, the unions, the quangocracy, the EU and the UN are all stuffed to the rafters with committed 'multi-culturalists' like these school inspectors, what chance has a small village in rural Devonshire got to preserve its way of life?

This replacing of one historic culture and way of life with another in order to achieve political ends is referred to as"un-homogenising" by the global 'progressive' elite who use the United Nations and the European Union as vehicles for their perverted agenda. Anywhere else on the planet its referred to as ethnic cleansing but I digress.

Appointed Special Envoy for Migration, career super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland openly advocates the EU "undermining national homogeneity" as matter of progress but as is normal practice among the unelected global 'progressive' elite the various people's affected are not allowed a say in this cultural upheaval let alone a vote.

Peter Sutherland and his fellow elitists have the mental ability to completely ignore the horrors visited upon hundreds of villages, towns and cities by open border mass immigration.

The rape of tens of thousands of underage white girls by Muslim paedophile gangs, people smuggling and violent street crime by East European criminal gangs, sex slavery and drug related turf wars on the streets of England and all the other negative aspects of mass immigration don't warrant a mention by the likes of Peter Sutherland and his fellow agenda driven bureaucrats.

Imposing 'multi-culturalism' on people who didn't ask for it and don't want it appears to be their life's ambition while ignoring the wishes of the people who's ancient way of life is under threat like never before.



 

UN Imposed Multi-Culturalism - Civilisation Itself Is Diminished

When United Nations super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland appeared on the BBC some time ago and  talked about the need for the European Union to 'undermine national homogeneity', one cannot be sure that the viewing public, let alone the public at large, realised the enormity of what he was saying.

A former head honcho at BP and Goldman-Sachs, he appeared under the guise of the UN sponsored Global Forum on Migration and Development. Like the modern day professional politician, it is unlikely that career bureaucrats such as himself has spent any quality time in the real world of the people who suffer the consequences of what they impose.  

In the minds of Sutherland and the global elite, all the problematic conditions that resulted in conflict and two world wars stemmed from the hegemony of what used to be known in leftist circles as the WASP,  the White Anglo Saxon Protestant. The usual buzzwords such as imperialism, colonialism, nationalism, inequality and the like, would all be laid at the door of the WASP.

WASP morphed into an catch-all term used to describe all people who were white with a Judaeo-Christian heritage.

With the growing influence and power of the UN came the global super bureaucrat of whom Peter Sutherland is the latest manifestation. What started as a noble effort for the worlds nations to take action in preventing wars, the UN as effectively abandoned this noble ideal and now sees itself as the world government.

What we are seeing today is the ongoing UN project to re-order the post-war world according to their vision alone, excluding everyone from outside their exclusive circle.

'Un-homogenising' as they like to call it, consists of replacing the traditional ways of life of WASP dominated cultures with so called 'multi-cultural societies'.

It has already been achieved in South Africa and Zimbabwe with disastrous consequences and it is well advanced in the Anglosphere. It is currently being imposed in Europe with equally disastrous consequences.

With two years left of his final term, President Obama is determined to finish 'fundamentally transforming' America by destroying the WASP dominated heritage of the American people. He is doing this with all the intensity of a scorched earth policy.

The borders are deliberately left open, illegal immigration is actively encouraged with amnesty and citizenship being the ultimate reward.

From five to a possible eleven million new non WASP citizens is tranformational in the extreme.

Career politicians and professional bureaucrats spend their lives in each others company, only interacting with like minded people who can comprehend a particular theory, a political philosophy or a policy and niothing else. Consequently they know very little about the real world inhabited by real  people who will suffer the practical reality of what they impose.

If they do understand the practical reality of what they impose then obviously they don't care, their re-ordering of global society is all that matters. The ending of white rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe was the aim of the UN regardless of the disastrous consequences they knew would befall the people.

The fact that the so called multi-cultural 'Rainbow Nation' has descended into a hellhole of tribalism, poverty, starvation, violence, rape and murder is of no consequence to people like Sutherland and the political elite. As long as the project to end white rule was achieved, then all's well that ends well.
 
Likewise in Zimbabwe with the installation of 'Butcher' Bob Mugabe, the UN's favourite Marxist dictator. The country, together its industries, its economy and its peace, has been totally destroyed but that's ok at least the white man is longer in charge.

Civilisation in South Africa and Zimbabwe has not been advanced by UN action but diminished.

The chosen method for 'undermining national homogeinty' in Europe is to impose a mythical 'multi-cultural society' via open border mass immigration combined with rigidly policed political correctness and anti-indigenate laws.

Some laws, such as hate crime laws, equality laws, animal welfare laws and child protection laws are selective, applying to indigenes only.
 
Since it is a practical impossibility to raise living and cultural standards in some parts of the world up to WASP levels, Sutherland and global elite are imposing global finacial and cultural equality by:

a) Redistributing wealth by a combination of foreign or development aid.

b) Transferring manfacturing industries and technology to the third world via the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO)

c) Redistributing wealth using the goverment sponsored perversion of science called Man Made Global Warming. Since there hasn't been any for two decades they shamelessly re-named it 'Combating Climate Change' and carried on redistributing taxpayers money regardless.

d) Instigating a cultural and demographic replacement policy by encouraging open border mass immigration from backward, incompatible cultures. These cultures are encouraged not to integrate while the indigenous population are cohersed into accepting them, together with some of their barbaric practices, under threat of prosecution.
     


With the 'un-homogenising' of Great Britain being the prime objective - as opposed to the wellbeing of the people - Peter Sutherland and the global elite will not be the slightest bit concerned that their so called multi-cultural society consists of thousands of mono-cultural, violent, crime ridden, welfare financed ghettoes that are unrecognisable as being British.

                                                                  

As is the case in Southern Africa, British society, along with its civilsed culture and its benign way of life has been downgraded and diminished so that career politicians and agenda driven professional bureaucrats can feel self satisfied that their 'progressive' re-ordering of the world is being achieved regardless of the cost to civilised standards.

David Cameron - To Succeed Great Britain Needs An Asian PM

                                                                         

                                         

Sometimes its difficult to understand what goes on inside the head of a career politician who has spent his entire life breathing the rarified air of a privileged elite and who has never spent any time in the real world inhabited by the majority of the British people.

It would appear that the agenda driven PR men and media managers who control David Cameron deliberately isolate him from the world outside and only feed him what they want him to hear in order for him to perform as required in the media.

The self proclaimed heir to the universally despised Tony Blair, he is on record as describing himself as a 'progressive' therefore it can be safely assumed that he is committed to imposing the agenda of the global elite as opposed to the representing the people he has been elected to serve.            

Despite all the false promises he makes to deceive the British people that he's listening, every speech that Cameron makes is loaded with references that re-assure his handlers he is remaining loyal to the global elite and committed to their transformational agenda.

His latest pronouncement that he would like to see an Asian Prime Minister in his lifetime, along with any position that has a title, is designed to achieve several outcomes.

Firstly, immigrant communities, both new and settled, have tended to vote for the Labour Party, especially those from the Indian sub-continent. With an election imminent, this is another example of Cameron shamelessly whoring for the Asian vote. (For the benefit of American readers, what the British refer to Asian is the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sir Lanka etc. as opposed to the Far East).    

Secondly, he is confirming to the global 'progressive' elite that despite any anti-immigration noises he may make during the election campaign - which are designed to spike the guns of the anti-EU United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) - he remains firmly on board with the UN and EU mandated cultural and demographic replacement agenda.

Cameron is echoing the words uttered on the BBC by UN super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland, the organisations head of the Global Forum on Migration and Development. The UN mandates that the EU must undermine national homogeneity and impose so called 'multi-cultural societies' across the continent in order to succeed economically.

It's nonsense of course, as anyone with an iota of common sense will realise when they think about for a millisecond or two. It's social engineering on a global scale. The UN has metamorphasised into a  'progressive' dominated organization that outlived its usefullness decades ago.

It's purpose today is not preventing wars or human rights abuses but promoting anti-Americanism and passing daily resolutions condemning Israel.

The cultural replacement process in Great Britain was started in earnest, and with total dedication, by Tony Blair and it is being continued with equal dedication by his chosen heir, David Cameron.

Thirdly, he is burnishing his own multi-cultural credentials in preparation for a Blair-like role when he is finally relieved of his post in British politics.

In his desperation, and in keeping with modern political discourse, Cameron and his media management team have given up even the pretence of being honest. They are openly flip flopping and lying depending on the prevailing political wind within the demographic group they are targeting on any particular day.

Last year, in response to rising Euroscepticism and the rise of the anti-immigrant groups across Europe,  both Cameron and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel were making calculated noises claiming that multi-culturalism doesn't work. Since then they have done absolutely nothing to stop it.

On the contrary, last week Frau Merkel was insisting that open borders is an absolute core value of the EU and therefore not negotiable.

It would appear that both Merkel and Cameron went off  Peter Sutherland's UN multi-cultural reservation with those remarks requiring a flip flop of epic proportions.

Cameron has since been promoting the multi-cultural cause with renewed vigour. Prior to his latest pronunciations about wanting an Asian Prime Minister, he has spoken about British politics being too white, not enough Muslim MP's, not enough MP's from ethnic minorities, Great Britain's lack of diversity is holding the country back etc. ad nauseum

On top of this he makes a point of celebrating every ethnic festival except English ones and despite all the daily evidence to the contrary from around the world he still insists on referring to Islam as the 'religion of peace'.

Cameron's Business Secretary Vince Cable, from the ever more ludicrous Liberal Democrat party, is insisting that twenty percent of FSTE 100 board members should be from ethnic minorities. This type of quota setting be it on the basis of ethnicity, gender, sexuality or anything else, runs the risk of downgrading the quality and experience of boardrooms for political reasons.

Cameron and Cable should listen to an icon of the Asian business community, Lord Bilimoria, who holds the opinion that a twenty percent target is wrong because it is out of proportion with the ethnic minorities in the population.

As an aside, Indian born Lord Bilimoria is not impressed with Cameron's immigration policy either.  He claims it sends out the wrong signals and targets the wrong people. He is especially critical of government incompetence with regard to illegal immigration.

He is particularly scathing about Cameron's Home Secretary Theresa May who he claims doesn't have a clue about illegal immigration and neither does her Department because they have lost control of it.

I would suggest that the noble Lord is not fully aware of the cultural replacement agenda which is being achieved using open border mass immigration. Cameron and May both know that illegals will never be deported and sure as death and taxes, illegals will be given amnesty in the end.

Again for the benefit of American readers, President Obama is pulling the very same stunt with illegal immigrants as they are about to find out in the near future.

The issue of success in the developed world being dependent on un-homogenising long established cultures and replacing traditional ways of life with so called 'multi-cultural societies' is more to do with global social engineering than economic growth or prosperity.

The British people need an explanation from both Cameron and Sutherland as to how a nation of people who have contributed so much to technical innovation, science, the arts etc., and also built one of the greatest civilizations in history, are now unable to tie their own shoe laces without millions of semi-literate, welfare dependent immigrants from backward cultures living in often violent mono-cultural ghettos?      
 

FMG, Child Abuse, Honor Killings etc. - A Price Worth Paying For Multi-Culturalism?

It was interesting to read that British Members of Parliament, including one of the Labour Party's top female crusaders, Ann Clwyd, are campaigning against the barbaric practice of Female Genital Mutilation. As I understand it they are planning to outlaw the practice if they haven't done so already.

It also became apparent that Parliament have also legislated, or plan to legislate, against child brides, forced marriage, selective gender based abortions, tribal scarring plus a plethora of other ethnic based practices that have always been an anathema to the indigenous British people.

This sudden burst of legislative action based on ethnic practices raises several important issues that need to be brought out into the open and examined in the clear light day regardless of the fact that the political class would rather they were kept in the dark and left undiscussed.

The hard pressed and much abused British people deserve an explanation and it is up to people like Ann Clwyd and her multi-culturalist comrades to provide it.

Firstly one has to remember that there is an election imminent where the universally unpopular issues of mass immigration and forced multi-culturalism will be high on the peoples agenda.

One question that needs answering is why is the government criminalizing some ethnic practices when they are studiously ignoring illegal ethnic practices in other areas?

Another question is why are they legislating against ethnic practices at all, isn't accepting different cultural and ethnic practices all part of the multi-cultural society Clwyd and her Labour Party comrades are imposing?

The British people are being continually told by the various party political spin machines that these practices are culturally enriching and a welcome addition to Great Britain's new diverse society. If that's the case then multi-culturalists like Ann Clwyd and her ilk must accept these cultures in their entirety warts and all. They cannot say out one side of their mouths that all cultures are equal and their practices must be respected, then legislate to outlaw the practices they disapprove of.

Multi-culturalism coupled with cultural relativism is their long planned agenda therefore they cannot pick and choose which practices are acceptable however uncivilised and barbaric they may be.

The whole idea of multi-culturalism was sold to the various immigrant communities with the promise that the old Great Britain is dead and gone, when they come to the 'new' modern Great Britain there would be no requirement to change their cultural practices or adapt to the British way of life.

In fact the reverse was true, the indigenous British people would be forced under threat of smear and prosecution into rejecting the values and practices of their own culture and accepting practices that were considered as taboo in order to accommodate these incompatible alien cultures.

One classic example is that of halal meat - slaughtering animals in accordance with Islamic tradition is illegal in Great Britain under its animal cruelty laws but the law enforcement establishment, in the form of the police 'service', refuse to arrest or prosecute Muslims for breaking these laws. Kick the neighbours dog for crapping your lawn and they'll send around a SWAT team faster than you can say Inshalla.

In the case of more serious crimes the police 'service' and politicians like Ann Clwyd have turned a blind eye to spousal abuse and barbaric child abuse as in the cases of the Muslim paedophile gangs that operate almost with impunity in most major British cities.

The reason they give for their selective application of the law is 'cultural sensitivity' or preserving 'community cohesion'. It must be obvious to all informed people that selectively applying law based on ethnic considerations is racist in the extreme.

If an ordinary member of the indigenous British public indulged in such ethnic profiling they would be charged with a hate crime and be punished under the full force of the law.

It is worth noting at this point the law mentioned in the previous paragraph is selectively applied to the indigenous British people only; hate preachers and jihadists such as Anjem 'Andy' Choudary are free to spout whatever anti- British filth they please unmolested by the police 'service'.

The list of enriching cultural practices that the British people have been forced to accept by Clwyd and her ilk are both varied and disturbing.

Female Genital Mutilation is one of the most barbaric with sixty thousand victims in Great Britain. There are some twenty three thousand young girls under the age of fifteen at risk.

Honour Killings is a the politically correct name given by the multi-culturalists for cold blooded, premeditated murder when carried out by member of an ethnic group. This is type of killing is normal in some cultures and is not recognized as a crime in countries such as Pakistan.

Forced Marriage including child brides is normal practice in many cultures but is particularly prevalent in Muslim communities. Older uncles marrying younger nieces, some as young as five years old, is another appalling practice that authorities have ignored for decades. High incidents birth defects among immigrant communities is put down to rampant inbreeding.

Gendercide and selective abortion is technically illegal but gender selective abortion is available to Asian immigrants so it can be assumed that the authorities are aware of it but turn a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity' or 'community cohesion'.

Ann Clwyd and the vocal section of the women's rights industry should note that  there are 1,400 to 4,700 girls missing from the British population only because of their gender.

Muslim paedophilia and other child abuse issues are up there as one of the most appalling cultural practices that have been foisted on the British people. The fact that the authorities in the towns and cities concerned turned a blind eye is shocking in the extreme. How these people can live with themselves let alone sleep at night when they knew young under age girls were being subjected to the vilest sexual abuse should be beyond any civilised person.

The list of practices and behaviors that the British people have been forced to accept under the threat of smear and prosecution is a long one and includes:

Human trafficking and slavery

Forced prostitution and sex slavery, including children male and female.

Tribal scarring of babies.

As they hide away in their taxpayer funded residences Ann Clwyd and her multi-cultural cronies in the Labour Party are never subjected to consequences they have forced other people to suffer and they never answer the question of how the British people are benefiting from their open door mass immigration policy?

How are the British people benefiting and what is enriching about the bridge people of Heston?

How is this immigrant camp at the old Hendon football ground enriching?

How is this the fouling up of one of London's most iconic areas enriching?

It must be remembered that forced multi-culturalism is not a victimless crime, there are over a hundred murdered people who would be alive today had it not been for the Labour Party and its mass immigration/cultural replacement policy. There are also tens of thousands of victims who would be unbeaten and unraped had it not been for people like Ann Clwyd and her ilk.

Whatever happened to the genteel green and pleasant land of a couple of decades ago  with cricket on the village green, warm beer and old maids cycling to Evensong on a balmy summer evening. What did the British people do wrong that they deserved their lives to be blighted in this way.

The answer is simple and if the British people are naive enough to believe the promises of the politicians then they deserve all they get. They are lying to appease your anger and garner your vote. Don't fall for it, kick them out.

The destruction of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture was long planned by a global 'progressive' elite to which the current political leadership are subservient. They are determined to push this cultural replacement agenda through until their multi-cultural is fully imposed.

If readers don't believe what I write then maybe the UN's professional resident bureaucrat on migration will be more convincing.

Peter Sutherland is adamant that Great Britain and Europe should open up its borders and be ethnically cleansed, to this end the UN will allow no backtracking by the current British political leadership.

He's at it again here on the BBC urging the EU to deliberately 'undermine national homogeneity'. In other words the EU should ethnically cleanse itself of all indigenous people.

If ever there was a candidate for dancing the Tyburn jig then this Nazi inspired buffoon is surely it.