Governments in the developed world are monopolised by wealthy metropolitan elites that are so remote they believe that they can implement their political agenda without regard to the views of the people they govern.
The leaders of the three main parties in Great Britain are clones of each other, Cameron, Clegg and Red Ed Miliband have identical backgrounds.
Privileged and wealthy they have spent their entire lives locked inside closed circles of like minded people to such an extent that they cannot identify with the people they are supposed to represent.
All three leaders describe themselves as 'progressives' who share an agenda dominated by trendy metropolitan issues that only they see as important. Government mandated equality and fairness, homosexual marriage, multi-culturalism, celebrating diversity, 'combating climate change' etc. ad nauseum.
In their arrogance they believe that only their vision counts and if anyone has the temerity to disagree they will be demonised and smeared by their agents in the media including the taxpayer funded BBC.
The Labour Party has long held the Marxist view that Great Britain, especially England, was a class based society that had to be fundamentally transformed, in other words destroyed and one of the tools they would use to achieve this was open border mass immigration.
Labour Party spin doctors denied that social engineering was the reason behind this disastrous immigration policy and claimed that it was driven by economic requirements.
Labour Party apparatchik and Tony Blair's bag carrier Andrew Neather inadvertently confirmed what everyone suspected, that the Labour Party were deliberately misleading the people; he confirmed in a memo that the real reason for mass immigration was social engineering and "to rub the right wing' noses in diversity".
The media narrative over the years was intended to convince the British people that their lives were being enriched by cultural diversity, this was as unconvincing as it was embarrassing.
The uncomfortable truth is that the majority of the arrivals into Great Britain were economic migrants who had made the journey to take advantage of the generous welfare benefits, not to enrich their own or British lives through cultural diversity.
These immigrants have no desire to integrate, instead they gather together into ghettos in order to carry on with their home cultures undisturbed.
The ghetto-ization of Great Britain continues apace with Muslim areas now declaring themselves
no-go areas to outsiders and subject to Sharia law instead of British law and where English is no longer the first language.
Advocates of this disastrous social engineering policy are trying to paint a picture of benign communities where different cultures have mutual respect and mingle harmoniously together. In reality many areas of Merry England have been totally transformed into mono-cultural ghetto's which are unrecognisable from a decade ago. Unsuspecting visitors would be forgiven for thinking that they have landed in a foreign country.
Fear of being singled out and smeared as a racist have cowed the British people into silence and they have now timidly accepted their own demise as a distinct culture.
The remaining half of the Two Fat Ladies cooking duo, Clarissa Dickson-Wright has no such fear. To the horror of the advocates of multi-culturalism she tells an anecdote in her latest book, Clarissa's England, about a bad experience in the city of Leicester.
Our heroine Clarissa lost her way and mistakenly wandered into the city's Muslim area which, she writes, "landed me into one of the most frightening experiences of my life".
" Parts of Leicester are a ghetto, seeing so many men in Islamic clothing and women in burkas left me feeling, in the middle of my own country a complete outcast and pariah".
She continues that when she asked directions the men refused to speak with her and neither did the women who were dutifully walking several paces behind the men.
Predictable howls of protest at the word 'ghetto' ensued from the usual rabble of thin skinned, easily offended 'victims' and also from the politically correct brigade who feign offence in order to demonise their opponents and to close the story down.
Clarissa Dickson-Wright stuck to her guns and further upset her detractors by adding that she was "surprised that any of the people who might object could read what I wrote as it is written in English".
Among the ranks of the offended was the Mayor of Leicester Sir Peter Soulsby. Clarissa had made him angry, bless him, because as an outsider she had painted a picture of Leicester that does not have any foundation in reality.
It is obviously lost on Sir Peter that Clarissa was writing about what she saw and felt at the time. Incidentally Sir Peter is a career politician who gave up his position as the city's Labour MP to become the Mayor of Leicester and therefore he has an ideological interest in the cultural replacement programme.
I would challenge Sir Peter Soulsby or any other advocate of multi-culturalism who deny the existence of ghettos in England to please partake of that quaint English custom of an evening stroll.
Try strolling through Mosside in Manchester, the St Paul's area of Bristol, Brixton or Banglatown in East London or Broadwater Farm in North London.
Clarissa Dickson-Wright has a message for her detractors including Sir Peter Soulsby. "My experience was unpleasant. It scared me and I am not scared easily. I have never believed that political correctness was a reason not to say what I have experienced".
Clarissa Dickson-Wright espouses traditional British values and to the dismay of the trendy metropolitan elites she is the antithesis of political correctness.
She enjoys country pursuits which has earned her death threats, including the dubious honour of being elevated to number three on the death list of the lunatic far left Animal Liberation Front.
Clarissa Dickson-Wright is a much loved British icon and a national treasure who has had the courage to speak out and articulate what the nation is thinking.
God bless her and long may she endure.