Abu Qatada - Supra-Nationalism And The Impotency Of Government

The release from Belmarsh Prison of jihadi fanatic Abu Qatada, Osama bin Laden's right hand man in Europe, does more than just release a dangerous terrorist onto the streets of Great Britain. It is a clear indication of what happens when politicians, with complete disregard for the interests or well being of the people they govern, give away sovereignty without regard for any future consequences.

It is widely accepted that the Labour government came into office in 1997 with a long planned agenda to permanently transform Great Britain into an autocracy where the traditional ethic of individual liberty and responsibility is replaced with government mandated equality and fairness.

Multi-culturalism via open border mass immigration combined with rigidly policed political correctness was used as a wrecking ball to demolish traditional British culture and ethics. This was a part of the deliberate policy of permanent demographic and cultural replacement.

Before 1997, the Home Secretary, after investigation and consultation, had the authority to refuse entry or to deport anyone that was not "conducive to the public good" or they were "not in the interests of national security".

To prevent future governments from deporting anyone the Labour government removed this power by a combination of  the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act of 1997 and Human Rights Act of 1998.

These two actions, in effect, act as an amnesty for illegal immigrants or criminal legal immigrants.

The British government has signed away the peoples sovereignty in many critical areas to supranational entities such as the European Union, the United Nations and disastrously to the European Court of Human Rights.

In addition to social policy, industrial policy, economic policy and jurisprudence, the British government has ceded control over its borders to foreign powers. The government is now powerless to act in the interests of British people.

Yesterdays farce over the Abu Qatada deportation is a perfect illustration of the consequences to sovereignty and liberty of supra-nationalism.

They don't come much worse than Abu Qatada. He is a Jordanian citizen and he is committed to jihad via terrorism and bloodshed. He was the spiritual advisor to Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the 9/11 terrorist gang. There is a worldwide embargo on Abu Qatada by the United Nations Security Council Committee 1267 because of his links to al Qaeda.

Theresa May the Home Secretary has indicated that she will appeal the decision yet again and the two most powerful people in the land, Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg have expressed their frustration at the decision.

That statement by these two traitorous fools will have bureaucrats shaking in their boots with fear in Brussels.

This pair of committed Europhiles claim they want him deported as early as possible and that they fully understand the frustration of the British people.

No they don't, they are lying!! If they really understood our frustration then they would either change the system that allows this piece of filth to remain in the country or they would act in the interests of the British people and deport him regardless.

Other signatories such as France and Italy routinely act in the interests of their citizens by deporting undesirables.

The fact is that Cameron and Clegg are committed to the European Union of which the European Court of Human Rights is a condition of membership.

To add insult to injury, Abu Qatada and his family have been living on welfare benefits since they entered Great Britain on forged passports in 1993.  His legal bills are also paid for by the taxpayer.

I believe there are lessons to be learned from this shambles by the American people.

The President is on record as saying that he will find ways to govern America by bypassing Congress.

Supra-national obligations is an alternative method of getting long standing aspirations into effect. A classic example is the 2nd Amendment gun rights for the American people.

The constitutional right to bear arms has been the target of  'progressives' for decades. They will attempt to achieve this by using a United Nations binding supra-national treaty to bypass the Constitution.

The latest supranational area of control and redistribution thievery that is being discussed is the making of access to education, housing, health care and social security a basic human right for everyone on the planet by amending the UN Charter.

Those countries signed up to The United Nations Human Rights Charter will pay into a fund which will make these services available in the developing world. This is redistribution of wealth on a global scale and will cost the American taxpayer dearly.

The American people must be vigilant, monitor everything their government says and does.

These believe socialism is inevitable, they believe it is their destiny, they will never ever give up.