Great Britain's Time To Choose - Independence Day Or Subjugation Day

In 1973 the British people were deceived into joining what was then the Common Market by Prime Minister, Edward Heath, with the promise that it was nothing more than a benign customs union between the major nations of Europe.

The real intention to replace the independent nation states of Europe with a single post democratic state was to be kept from the people since their consent could not be guaranteed.

Sovereignty was to be transferred using a series of Treaties each being disguised as being of economic benefit. This was communicated to Heath by none other than one of the so-called founding fathers of the EU, Jean Monet:

"Europe's nations should be guided towards a superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation"

In what has become the standard method of modern political campaigning, those brave souls who opposed the establishment agenda and told the truth were demonised, vilified and smeared.

And so it came to pass, the treaties came as planned each falsely presented as being of economic benefit and national sovereignty was transferred piecemeal. Since the treaty of Paris in 1951, there followed the Treaty of Rome in 1957, the Merger Treaty in 1965, Schengen Agreement 1985, Single European Act 1986, Maastricht Treaty 1992 and the Amsterdam Treaty 1997.

Finally in 2007 came the Lisbon Treaty which is in reality the EU constitution. These treaties have created the European Central Bank, the Euro, the European Court of Justice and the European Parliament along with a European flag, a national anthem and will soon to be recognized as a state in it's own right by the United Nations.

The European Parliament cannot initiate or vote down legislation, this is the sole perogative of the unelected European Commission.

Consequently, and as planned, sovereignty has been transferred from democratically elected legislators in the national parliaments to unelected bureaucrats in the European Commission.

The mission started in 1951 by people such as Jean Monet has finally came to fruition by 2016. The people of Europe have been disenfranchised.

Europe is on fire, the whole superstate project has been a complete and utter disaster for the people of Europe except for the governing elite who enjoy unlimited power and the riches that bestows.

The British have a choice today to put an end to this misery by choosing freedom over tyranny which in turn will galvanize the rest of Europe to follow suit and bring the whole corrupt edifice crashing down.

If they choose subjugation then Europe will enter a new dark age of division and violent conflict made infinitely worse by adherence to a perverted ideology that guarantees poverty and serfdom for the many and untold riches for the few.

British Independence Surrendered Using Lies, Deceit And Treachery

                                       German Chancellor with British Gauleiter David Cameron

There was a time in the not too distant past when children were brought up to believe that lying was one of the most damnable sins possible, almost as heinous as murder itself. Those involved in bringing up a child, including parents, neighbours, teachers , Sunday School superintendents and the local Bobby, were consistent in embedding the message that lying was supremely bad.

Lying was a means of persuasion exclusive to crooks, cheats and vagabonds of all persuasions; the threat of eternal damnation being no deterrent for those who lived dishonest lives on the fringes of society and endeavored to take advantage of the decency of their fellow citizens.

In those innocent days nothing hurt more than being lied to, whether it was the disappointment of being taken advantage of or the realisation that a person in position of trust had betrayed that trust for their own personal ends.

As we know to our cost those days are long gone.  In this modern age of the professional generic politician, lying is an acceptable means of gaining and the holding on to power. The 'ends justifying the means' extends to all political parties as they fight to impose their ideologically driven agendas.

The long suffering British people have been the victims of serial lying since the then Prime Minister Edward Heath, surrendered British sovereignty using a premeditated tissue of lies. With malice aforethought Heath and his collaborators, deceived the people, took them for fools and rendered them powerless in the face of their historical enemies and subject to a hostile bureaucracy bent on the destruction of their nation.

                                                     Heath Signs The British Death Warrant

Lying through his teeth, Heath declared that those who feared that going into Europe would mean a loss of independence and sovereignty were completely unjustified. Heath and his political descendants have been lying to the British people ever since.
(Leo McKinstry article on EU lying here)

It is now an accepted fact that the creation of a post democratic superstate had been the intention of the politicians from the beginning with the surrendering of sovereignty to be achieved by a series of treaties. Each treaty was to be falsely promoted as a tidying up exercise or having an economic benefit with the object of creating the superstate without the people realizing what happened until it was too late.
(Fredrick Forsyth on superstate lies here)

This was lying on a monumental scale by the agenda driven political class and its like minded cronies in the establishment.  It was willful deceit in pursuit of their political goals.

In  the hope of a plumb position in the new superstate, a consummate and practiced liar, Tony Blair negotiated Great Britain's final surrender with the Lisbon Treaty, again claiming it was a tidying up exercise as opposed to the final nail in the coffin of the independent nation states of Europe. Blair along with Cameron and the leaders of the other two parties promised the people a referendum before its adoption.

They were lying of course as we all knew they were and as things stand today, the British people have lost their independence without the promised referendum. Apart from the United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), all party leaders are totally committed to the European superstate project and will make any promise, tell any lie and stab any back to make sure that the British people stay locked in the EU prison.

The actual deed of signing the Lisbon treaty fell to Blair's successor Gordon Brown, a sociopath who's lies were so audacious they were an embarrassment to anyone with an iota of decency. His excuse for denying a referendum was his infamous 'red lines' which he claimed rendered a referendum unnecessary. These were a series of opt-outs which supposedly protected British interests. What they were and where they are now is a mystery.
(Red Line stories here and here)

                                              Brown signs away Great Britain's Independence

The government at Westminster may have changed but the habit of lying to the British has not, in fact it is so embedded into everyday political discourse one has to accept that a politician is lying as a matter of course. The modern politician no longer engages in proper debate or speaks to the public as adults, they are totally controlled by media managers, spin doctors and image makers.

They talk in a series of centrally issued slogans and sound bites and are unable to respond independently to any topic relying instead on the 'line-to-take' dispensed by the duty spin doctor. Any appearances outside the remote incestuous world they inhabit is choreographed down to the minutest detail and this mainly consists of a set of contrived and often embarrassing photo opportunities.

In a desperate rearguard action to avoid defeat in the recent general election, the Prime Minister David Cameron and his then Deputy Nick Clegg took political lying to levels previously unseen. These two had zero experience in the world that normal people inhabit and live under the impression that PR and spin can fool all of the people all of the time.

Even though they know, that ever increasing numbers of people know that they are lying, they persist with their nonsense in the hope that they can fool enough people to mitigate their predicament.

Cameron continues to promise a renegotiation of membership terms despite the politicians and bureaucrats that control the EU, and therefore Great Britain, are unanimous that there will be no renegotiation, there will also be no repatriation of powers to Westminster.

He knows when he promises to curb immigration or prevent immigrant access to the people's welfare system that he will be not allowed to do this by his EU masters but he makes the promises anyway.

He also knows that any referendum on Great Britain's membership will be an exercise in deceit unprecedented in political history. In the unlikely event that the people voted to leave, Cameron's EU masters will ignore the result as they did the Irish and the Dutch.

The sad thing about the current political class is that they would get more credibility if they simply treated the British public with respect, displayed a little honesty and told the truth. The public know where the politicians stand on the main issues so they might as well stop lying and maybe, just maybe, their Creator, whoever they conceive him to be, will judge them well and forgive them for their life of lying, cheating, and deceiving the very public they have sworn to serve.

(Due to time constraints this is a re-edited post from last year)

British Exit From The EU - Fool Me Twice, A Referendum Is Not Required

As the European Union slowly reveals itself to be the post democratic monolith that has almost completed it's long planned dismantling of the nation states, and with it any remaining civil liberties, the continued membership of Great Britain is high on the political agenda.

Whenever British membership of the EU comes to the fore it is always accompanied by the issue of a referendum, or to be more precise, the absence of one. People must be made aware that linking membership of the EU or a British exit, now known as Brexit, is a successful, tried and tested political ploy designed to hoodwink them into remaining a member.

Getting involved with a referendum is a dangerous game where the unscrupulous political class have all the power combined with the utter ruthlessness to use it. A referendum on British membership is unnecessary and in the event one is granted, the odds are that the people will lose.

"Europe's nations should be guided toward a superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation". - Jean Monet letter dated 30th April 1952

As an increasing number of British people are now realising, the European Union that we see today is indeed a carefully constructed dictatorship that was long in the planning. The slow inexorable transfer of sovereignty from the nation states to the unaccountable bureaucracy in Brussels was achieved by deceit, subterfuge and outright lies, as the Jean Monet letter confirms.
(Monet quote from here)

The British people were lied to from the very beginning by the then Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath who was fully aware of the European project but continually denied it's ultimate aim was a post democratic superstate. As the people are now realising to their cost, they have been lied to ever since by a succession of politicians from all parties who have played down or denied their dedication to the superstate project or have kept it hidden from their constituents.

The issue of a referendum on membership has also been there from the beginning but it has always been surrounded by lies and obfuscation for the simple reason that the Europhiles could never be one hundred percent confident they could win one.

Prime Minister Heath stated falsely that "European integration would not happen except with the consent of Parliaments 'and the peoples' of the new member countries"; this means a referendum.

There was no referendum when the accession treaty was signed, there was no referendum when the European Communities Act went through Parliament and there was no referendum when Great Britain finally joined in 1973.

The British people, Eurosceptics, and UKIP members in particular, should note what happened next and learn the lessons from it because it is being repeated by the current Prime Minister, David Cameron. "We Won't Get Fooled Again" sang the Who back in 1971, but don't bank on it in this case.

Like the Conservative Party is today, the Labour party was split down the middle on the issue of European Club membership and promised a renegotiation of terms followed by a referendum....if they were elected in the 1974 general election. They were duly elected and entered into a sham renegotiation which changed nothing and a referendum followed. The appalling behaviour of the establishment in recent Euro elections pale into insignificance compared to what happened in that referendum campaign.  This in turn will be an even weaker shadow of the next one if Cameron keeps his word.

The government, the entire British press, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), the big banks, the major industrial companies, all combined to deceive and lie to the British people. Like the last campaign, they insulted, demonised and ridiculed the major representatives of the 'NO' campaign.

Unsurprisingly the 'Yes" campaign won a decisive victory which they subsequently used to carry out Jean Monet's plan to the letter. Sovereignty was surrendered in a series of treaties, each shamelessly disguised as having an economic purpose or passed off as "a tidying up exercise" which didn't require a referendum.

There followed the Schengen Treaty, the Single European Act, the treaties of Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice and finally the Lisbon Treaty which is in reality, a Constitution which gives the EU legal status as a nation. It must be noted that all three of the old legacy parties promised a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty but in line with the unprincipled behaviour of the modern political class, all three reneged on their promises.
(See the Treaties here)

It is the belief of a growing number of people that:

a)  Owing to the fact that the power currently being wielded by the unelected EU bureaucrats is the result of transfers of sovereignty that was achieved using known falsehoods and deliberate lies, these transfers are null and void.

b)  According to the politicians, these transfers of sovereignty did not require a referendum, therefore using the same logic, a referendum is not required for that same sovereignty to be returned to the people.

All that will be required is to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty or failing that just walk away.
(Article 50 petition here)

c) Any referendum will not be free and fair. The 'In' campaign will have access to the massive resources of the entire EU and British government machines.  This will include money, publicity and unlimited manpower. They will also have at their disposal the government-media complex and the politicised institutions, including the BBC, the Church of England, the Roman Catholic Church, the Judiciary, the taxpayer funded charities and the self serving establishment etc. etc.

The UN would pile in on their behalf and any referendum where a socialist dictatorship is at risk will undoubtedly attract the unwanted attention of Barack Obama.

d) Millions of British men and women made the ultimate sacrifice in two World Wars to prevent a German dominated European superstate and also to preserve British sovereignty for future generations in perpetuity.

It is on this last point that I will conclude. When our men and women made the ultimate sacrifice they are dead forever, therefore the sovereignty that they died for is bequeathed to us who are left, is also forever. No politicians or people, current or in the future, have the right to surrender that sovereignty and deprive future generations of the independence and personal liberties that sovereignty brings.

Trade deals, military alliances and any other form of cooperation between Great Britain and other nations can be achieved without the surrender of the peoples' sovereignty or their democracy or their individual liberties.

British sovereignty belongs to the fallen therefore it is not ours to surrender.

Mass Immigration Disaster - Progressive Political Apologists Claim It Was An Accident

The Saturday Essay by 'progressive' do gooder, David Goodhart, in the Daily Mail is the latest in a series of speeches and musings by the remote ruling elite, admitting that mass immigration may have been an error.

This essay follows hot on the heels of Red Ed Miliband's admission that the Labour Party's immigration policy may have been misguided and Nick's Clegg's admission that his Lib Dem party's long standing policy on amnesty for illegals is now suddenly wrong.

At the time of writing, Conservative Ministers, MEP'S and Honourable Members worried about their imminent annihilation in the coming European Elections, are urging their leader 'Call Me Dave' Cameron to make a major speech on the follies of mass immigration.

The sad thing about this sudden outpouring of faux concern and speech making, is that they think the people don't know what they are up to. The people are well aware that if there were no election looming and UKIP were not gaining ground, there would be no concern, no speeches and no sham essays.

Since Prime Minister Edward Heath sacked his Shadow Cabinet member Enoch Powell for warning about the economic burden of mass immigration, it has been obvious that transforming Great Britain into a multi-cultural society has been a long planned cross party policy. Powell's sacking and his subsequent hounding out of office gave an indication that the government and the craven Establishment would adopt a zero tolerance to dissent, no matter how small.

This zero tolerance is still in evidence today by the smearing of anyone, including law abiding ladies from Rochdale, who dare to raise the question of mass immigration or multi-culturalism. Politicians and the Establishment are determined to socially engineer the multi-cultural country that their 'progressive' ideology demands, with or without the consent of the British people and in this case it is most definitely without their consent.

The patronising arrogance of this 'progressive' elite renders them incapable of understanding the hopes, aspirations or wishes of the majority of the people. They are under the delusion that they are always right and that they know what is best for the British people.

As is always the case, these elitists are immune from the consequences of the ideology that they force on other people.

Perhaps if they were made to leave their exclusively white havens in Hamptsead and forced to live in the ghettos they have created in Mosside, Manchester or Broadwater Farm, Tottenham, or the monocultural cesspits in Bradford, Leicester, Bristol, Wolverhampton, Rochdale, Rotherham etc. ad nauseum, they wouldn't be so keen on mass immigration.

The self confessed 'left leaning Hampstead liberal' David Goodhart is one such patronising elitist who championed mass immigration as a vehicle for social engineering, together with the imposition of a multi-cultural dystopia on the the people, and for the simple reason that he knows best.

This so called essay, like Cleggs speech, is a carefully crafted piece of propaganda designed to give the impression that a)  a multicultural society is already here so get used to it, b) in many places the diverse communities are living in peace and harmony c) Britain is a livelier and more dynamic country and d) mistakes were made but the mass immigration policy is the right one but perhaps it happened a tad too fast.

David Goodhart condescended to come down from planet Progressive and spent 18 months touring the country in order to reach his pro multi-cultural conclusions. Those who have spent decades living with the appalling consequences of mass immigration and who have reached very different conclusions are routinely dismissed as inward looking little Englanders and racists.

He states that the race lobby, of which he is a member, "have been slow to recognise that strong collective identities are legitimate for majorities as well as minorities, for white as well as black".

Goodhart also states that "existing citizens must have special rights over non citizens. Immigration must be managed with their interests in mind". If anyone outside of his elite circle said this they would, without a doubt, be smeared as racists.

He thinks that by pretending to sympathise with the majority who are against mass immigration and multi-culturalism, that he can spike the guns of UKIP on behalf of his political masters. The polls indicate that the defection away from the legacy parties is strong and irrevocable so his 18 months travelling among the plebs will be in vain.

Goodhart goes on to state the shocking fact that more immigrants arrive on British shores in a single year than arrived in the whole period from 1066 to 1950. As he well knows, this was a deliberate, well planned policy but he is trying to absolve his 'progressive' friends from blame by claiming it was an 'accident'.

In 1948 the government gave the right to Empire and Commonwealth citizens the to live and work in Great Britain and to their horror hundred of thousands turned up unexpectedly. They tried this line again with the Eastern Europeans in 1997 when a projected influx of 16,000 turned into 1.5 million.

According to Goodhart, by the time of the next census in 2021 the non white population will have trebled to 20% and white Britons will be a minority by 2066. He correctly states that in some towns and cities this is already the case.

He claims there was no discussion in the 'New' Labour Cabinet about this influx or about the pressure this would put on public services. As a magazine editor and Financial Times correspondent, how would he know what was discussed in the Cabinet? Not even senior government Ministers knew what Blair was discussing with his secretive inner circle.

The arrogance of these people is on full display as Goodhart goes on to admit that they, including him, are deep into "a huge social experiment" and to give it a chance of working we must slow down.

Who gave the political class, and people such has Goodhart, permission to be indulging in social experimentation with the well being of the British people?  They don't have the right to alter peoples lives for the worse without their consent. The people are not guinea pigs in some kind of 'progressive' laboratory.

Goodhart States that "the whole post war process of immigration has been badly managed". He also states that the importation of people from the Indian subcontinent to the soon to close textile mills
"was a poor piece of social engineering". He then tests the credulity of the reader by trying to claim that "no one really engineered it. It just happened".

This is the second time in this so called essay that Goodhart tries to convince his readers that the mass immigration disaster was an accident and that the government was not to blame.

As Goodhart well knows, mass immigration and its disastrous consequences didn't "just happen". He admits himself that senior people were following a secret pre-planned agenda which had different priorities from those of the British people.

"There has been a huge gap between our ruling elite's views and those of the ordinary people on the street".  No kidding Goodhart. Among normal people this is known as 'stating the bleeding obvious'.

As we all do occasionally, Goodhart was dining at an Oxford college when an eminent person next to him, 'a very senior civil servant' said that "when I was at the Treasury, I argued for the most open door possible to immigration because I saw it as my job to maximise global welfare not national welfare". He doesn't name this 'very senior civil servant' who should be made to explain his views to the British people. Its the people's money that he's giving away after all.

Another guest, one of the most powerful television executives in the country held similar views. "He, too, felt global welfare was paramount and that he had a greater obligation to someone in Burundi that to someone in Birmingham". Goodhart fails to mention who this powerful television executive was, so that he can be held accountable for his views, especially if the television company was the publicly funded BBC.

This demonstrates, even to apologists such as Goodhart, that mass immigration and the creation of a multi-cultural society was no accident. Rather it was planned by a secretive powerful elite who excluded the British people and transformed their country, using their money and without their consent.

I could carry on fisking this excuse for an essay but the pubs are open and there are better things in life than reading a piece of propaganda that attempts to absolve the current political leadership of any blame for their disastrous policy of mass immigration and cultural replacement.

As the mood of the nation swings away from the legacy political parties and their 'progressive'  ideology, the British people can expect a lot more of this pseudo intellectual nonsense from all corners of the Establishment as they try to reverse the tide of change.

Hopefully the momentum toward a free and prosperous Great Britain will be unstoppable right up to the next election cycle where the current political order will get the kicking that they thoroughly deserve.

The EU Debate - PR Expert Cameron Takes The British People For Fools

Enlightened people who are immune to spin will be accused of sour grapes when they point out the reality of what Prime Minister David Cameron achieved yesterday with his long awaited speech on Great Britain's place in the post democratic European Union (EU.)

The British people must prepare themselves for months or even years of pro EU propaganda as Cameron's PR machine cranks into action to proclaim the brilliance of his speech and his vision of a reformed benign Europe acting in the interests of the British people and the other people of Europe.

At this point it's worth taking a step back to recap on the events that brought about this so called historic speech in the first place.

Most enlightened people know that if it wasn't for the rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and the disenchantment of the British people with the creeping authoritarianism of the EU together with the ever rising cost to the taxpayer, he wouldn't have made the speech at all and it would still be full steam ahead to a federal superstate.

David Cameron is a self confessed, unapologetic 'progressive' and Europhile; he is also totally committed to the EU project of a modern, multi-cultural superstate based on government mandated equality and fairness.

The British people have finally woken up to the fact that the political class and establishment are consummate liars. Politicians cannot go about their daily business without lying; it is acceptable to them and boringly routine for the people.

The politicians of the day led by Prime Minister Edward Heath lied to the British people over accession to the then Common Market. The objective then was gradual integration, or "ever closer union" to a federal superstate. This objective was always denied and the truth tellers were smeared and vilified as xenophobes and scaremongers.

(I recall the introduction of Value Added Tax (VAT) which was levied at 4.5% or thereabouts. The truth tellers warned at the time that after introduction VAT would only ever go up. They were smeared and dismissed as scaremongers by Euro fanatics such as Michael Heseltine. As was predicted by the truth tellers VAT is currently set at an eyewatering 20%)

Lying about the true nature of the EU project has been carried on through the generations of the political elite to the current crop of habitual liars led by career PR man David Cameron.

The EU has been a total disaster for the people of Europe and especially for the British people. Whole industries have been destroyed by excessive regulation and taxation. There is no aspect of life that has not been affected by petty regulations enforced by faceless bureaucrats.

For the politicians it's a different story.  They get to control people outside the democratic process and make personal fortunes at the same time by helping themselves to taxpayers money. The Kinnock family being a case in point.

The British people are traditionally a free spirited and independent people who are slow to anger but the disaster of the EU has woken them up and they demand a say in their future.

The Euro fanatics see this awakening as a threat that must be neutralised before it gathers momentum and puts their European superstate project in jeopardy.

David Cameron's objectives are those of a typical 'progressive' and are relatively simple when looking at this particular issue. He believes that Europe should be a single, multi cultural, egalitarian entity where the traditional nation states exist in name only.

He believes that his re-election to office is key to pushing this project through to its conclusion and this re-election is threatened if the current disillusionment with his leadership and the drift to UKIP continues.

His response to this is easy to see through because it is typical PR and consists of stealing UKIP's clothes in order to spike their guns, promising jam tomorrow, starting a huge propaganda campaign and above all taking the British people for fools.

David Cameron plans to put into his next election manifesto that he will renegotiate the terms of membership, he will demand certain powers, that have already been given away by politicians like him, be repatriated and he will then put the new terms to the British people in an In/Out referendum.

This is a cynical manipulation and if the the people fall for this they will not only need their heads examined but they will inadvertently give Cameron and his 'progressives' a mandate to finish the project started by Heath and it would signal the end of Great Britain as a sovereign nation.

When the Blair/Brown administration was challenged in court over breaking their election manifesto promises post election, the judge confirmed that election manifesto's are not worth the paper they are written on. It transpires that the promises in their manifesto were aspirations only and not legally binding. Cynical, lying politicians win and the people lose as usual.

David Cameron has past form of breaking 'cast iron' promises that he makes to the electorate. He gave the impression during that last election campaign that he will be the most Eurosceptic Prime Minister ever. After the election he declares he is a passionate European. In other words he lied to the British people.

The whole world and his uncle knows that Euro fanatics do not do renegotiation or repatriate powers that they have spent years stealing from the people. European leaders have already said so together with the leaders of the EU Council, the EU Commission and the majority of MEP's in the European Parliament.

Nick Clegg and his Liberal Democrats, Ed Miliband and the Labour Party, the Trade Union Congress plus an assortment of business leaders with a vested interest,  have all indicated that they want to participate in the United States of Europe and do not want repatriation of powers. Cameron doesn't have now and will not get the votes in any future Parliament to get this through.

Prior to the last election all three party leaders promised the British people a referendum on EU membership in their manifestos, all three reneged on their promises after the election.

There are a number of urgent questions that need to be answered by the PR man and his team of spinners.

Exactly what powers does he want repatriated? No spin just details.

In line with all sovereign states, will the British people regain control of their borders?

Will the British people be allowed to decide who is allowed into their country?

Will the British people be allowed to deport people who are detrimental to the public good?

Will the British taxpayer still be forking out 60 million per day in membership fees?

Will the British taxpayer forfeit the Thatcher rebate?

Despite previous promises (all broken) will the Common Agricultural Policy be reformed?

Likewise the disastrous Common Fisheries Policy?

Since this renegotiation is not scheduled to happen for another 5 years will there be a moratorium on "ever closer union" in the interim period?

Will there be a suspension of job strangling regulations until the referendum is complete?

Will the estimated 2 million Romanian and Bulgarian beggars be allowed in before the referendum is complete?

etc. etc. etc.

We need the referendum now or else it will be five more years of "ever closer union" and the British people will be so far into the mire it would be unlikely they would ever be able to extricate themselves.

In conclusion,  the people should beware the words of the spinners and PR men, they should always pay close attention to what they say.

Cameron stated many times at the last Prime Ministers Questions (PMQ's) that he passionately believes Great Britain should be a member of the EU and that he will campaign to stay in.

"if we can negotiate such an arrangement, I will campaign for it with all my heart and soul"

He failed to answer a simple question 3 times yesterday that if he cannot get a successful renegotiation will he campaign for a 'No' vote?

Failure to answer this simple question indicates that he will campaign for a 'Yes' vote whatever the outcome of a negotiation.

If the people don't know what his negotiating position is or what powers he wants repatriated he can claim success whatever the outcome and campaign for a 'Yes' vote.

Most enlightened people can see through the PR deceit and wouldn't trust Cameron as far as they can spit but unfortunately there will be the unenlightened masses who will fall for the PR  and who will be convinced of Cameron's sincerity.

These are the people who need to be convinced in the years ahead that if they don't wake up to Cameron's deceit they will be condemning themselves and their compatriots to a future of multi-cultural poverty and authoritarianism in the well publicised post democratic age.