Trump Hatred - Disrespecting The American People And Taking Them For Fools

The manufactured hysteria being whipped up around the world against President Trump under the pretext of a cruel immigration ban exposes not only the power of the global media machine but the determination of the global elite to prevent him from governing and putting a halt to their ‘fundamental transformation’ agenda.

It also exposes the lies, deceit and dirty tricks they employ, along with using embedded corrupt public
officials, including the judiciary, to prevent the President from fulfilling his campaign promise to keep the American people safe.

His Executive Order (EO) to put in place a temporary ban on immigration from seven America hating, terrorist infested countries which were highlighted by the intelligence agencies under the Obama administration has been variously described as an immigrant ban, a Muslim ban and the more emotion triggering ‘refugee ban’ which was designed to wind up the snowflakes and bring them onto the streets in protest.

To the mature, emotionally stable and informed members of the populace none of these are true, the EO is exactly what it says it is; a temporary ban on immigration from these hideous places until proper vetting procedures can be put in place that weeds out the terrorists and anyone else that despises America, does not share it’s values and hates its people and their way of life.

The campaign promise to deport illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes including drug smuggling, rape and murder is also being misrepresented in order to stir up emotions and hatred for President Trump.

The policy of deporting foreign criminals and illegal immigrants has long been Federal law which has not been enforced by previous agenda driven administrations. President Trump is doing the job he was elected to do by enforcing a law that already exists.

Like the rest of the propaganda campaign, the charge that he is intentionally targeting ‘law abiding’ illegals and deliberately splitting up families is designed to stir up the emotions of the feeble minded and foster hatred.

Incidentally, since there are no restrictions on anyone leaving the country to join a deported miscreant; no families are being deliberately torn asunder; it is a simple matter of priorities and personal choice for the families concerned.

The United States of America is no different to any other country on the planet by having immigration laws which include visa requirements, a naturalization process, rules on citizenship and most importantly penalties for illegal entry and visa overstaying along with criteria for deportation.

Judging by the chorus of opprobrium directed at the United States and President Trump from around the world it would appear that they, and only they, are inhumane for having the same laws as everyone else. America and President Trump must be the only country in world that are castigated and vilified for enforcing the law of the land. 

Mexico and its President attract no such opprobrium even though their immigration laws and
deportation procedures are stricter than those of its northern neighbor.

These laws include:

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society.

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country.

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned.

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported and/or imprisoned as felons.

Under Mexican law illegal immigration is a felony.

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law.

The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens from partaking in the country’s political life.

The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. (See here)

Although he has suggested no such thing President Trump has been vilified for the idea that anywhere between three and ten million illegal immigrants may be deported, however President Narendra Modi of India, a staunch ally and trading partner of the USA, suffers no such vilification for his country’s policy to deport some twenty million illegal immigrants back to Bangladesh.

These deportations are to prevent the Muslim immigrants out-breeding the locals and depriving them of their identity and, horror of horrors, to prevent terrorists infiltrating India among the immigrant flow.

As I know from personal experience strict conditions apply for any foreigner wanting to live and work in India and despite the fact that Indians have become citizens in countries around the world, Indian citizenship is only available to those of Indian origin. (See here and here)

In a similar vein Kenya is planning to deport four hundred and twenty-five thousand Somali ‘refugees’, without any global hysteria, because the invaders are ‘a breeding ground for terrorism and an economic burden’.

The global propaganda machine has ‘blacked out this news because it undermines the ‘Somali refugee’ narrative promoted in the west and because it’s a black state doing the expelling, instead of a European state’. (Read the article here).

Another example of immigration and deportation requirements that are stricter than those of the USA is NATO ally and prospective member of the European Union, Turkey.

They will deport foreigners who:

Use false information and fraudulent documents in procedures concerning entry into Turkey.

Who make a living through illegitimate means during their stay in Turkey.

Who exceed the duration of visa or visa exemption more than ten days, or who’s visa has been cancelled.

Who are identified as having been working without a work permit.
(See here)

One final example to illustrate the sheer hypocrisy of those that feign uproar at President Trump’s Executive Order is the case of the American born Muslim convert, Abdulakim Mujahid Mohammad. He is the perpetrator of the terrorist outrage in Little Rock, Arkansas in 2009 where one person was killed and another injured.

Mohammad traveled to Yemen in 2007 ostensibly to teach English but was deported for overstaying his visa and not having the correct government travel permits. He was also in possession of a fake Somali passport.

It’s more than ironic that an American citizen was jailed and deported from one of the proscribed countries for overstaying his visa and not having the required documentation. What’s even more ironic is that Mohammad had married a local Yemeni woman, therefore his deportation split up his family.

And so it goes on and on. Immigration and deportation procedures from allies, trading partners and enemies alike that are equal if not stricter than those of the USA but do not attract the vilification and hysteria from the global media or from foreign leaders who enforce the law of their own land but criticize President Trump for doing the same.

In conclusion: By continually vilifying and criticizing their choice of President and his commitment to enforce the law of the land like any other responsible President or Prime Minister, the American people are being disrespected and taken for mugs and fools.

America is well capable of surviving on its own, it doesn’t need the rest of the world so who could blame them if they pulled up the drawbridge, secured fortress America and gave us all the middle finger.

Canadian immigration article here

Immigration pitfalls in Indonesia here

  

Hope And Change Kenya Style - Yes We Can!

Much political capital was made during the 2008 Presidential election campaign about the links between President Obama and Africa on account of his father being Kenyan. His political opponents claim that although they were estranged, and in order to secure the non-white vote, candidate Obama successfully passed himself off as an African-American even though he is of mixed race due to his white mother.

These same detractors also claim that his links to Africa, tenuous as they may have been, were exploited in order to seduce low information voters into believing they were making history by electing the first African-American president.

In other words they are claiming that an upbringing in Indonesia and Hawaii followed by a life in Chicago, his links both emotional and cultural to Africa are manufactured for image and electoral purposes, therefore they can be discounted. Any student of post colonial Africa will confirm that this is foolishly incorrect.

To anyone who has any knowledge or experience in East Africa, especially Kenya, the parallels between how these governments operate and the Obama administration are startling. Whether he has consciously used these governments as a template for his own is open to question but it cannot be discounted entirely.

The history of Kenya is well documented elsewhere but briefly for this essay a stable government by the Colonial Office was the hallmark of British colonial rule. The decolonisation process consisted of a transitional government led by the first elected black Prime Minister, Jomo Kenyatta, and a Governor General representing the Queen, working under an agreed Constitution.

Americans should take note that things started to plummet downhill after full independence was granted in December 1963 and the parallels with the current administration began to appear in earnest.

In June 1964 Kenyatta amended the Constitution to make Kenya a republic with himself as President. He gave himself wide executive powers effectively sidelining the legislature becoming not only the Head of State and Commander in Chief of the armed forces but Head of Government as well.

His contempt for the Constitution was further demonstrated when he ignored it again after his re-election in 1966 granting himself all the power he needed to run Kenya entirely by Executive Order. He filled important posts in the government, industry and the military with his own cronies along with family members and fellow tribal members.

During his rule Jomo Kenyatta used government agencies, including the police and the military, to harass political opponents finally banning the only other political party prior to the 1969 elections. Principled opposition politicians fled into exile with the unprincipled former opposition politicians joining with Kenyatta in his Kenya African National Union (KANU).

For fifteen years Kenyatta remained in control of this one party state until he died in 1978 to be succeeded by his deputy, Daniel arap Moi.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" could have been written especially for Moi who continued ignoring the Constitution for the next twenty four years engendering one of the most hopelessly corrupt governments in Africa if not the entire world.

The current President of Kenya is Uhru Kenyatta, son of Jomo who is currently under investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for human rights abuses.

The United States of America obviously hasn't reached this condition just yet but it can't be denied that by sidelining its Constitution, bypassing the legislature and allowing a President to govern by Executive Order it is embarking on the same road as Kenya and therefore it is only a matter of time.

With little difference between the ruling Democrat Party and the establishment run Republican Party, America is for all intents and purposes a one party state with no third party on the horizon to halt the visible decline into third world status.

It's a safe bet that whoever wins the next election deficit spending will remain, the national debt will continue to increase, the borders will remain porous, amnesty to illegals will be granted and African levels of corruption in the government and its agencies will remain deeply entrenched.

In conclusion its worth noting that altering the Constitution in order to by-pass legislators thus instituting government by Executive Order is the African way, therefore if President Obama does have emotional and cultural links with East Africa then his current behavior is explainable and shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone.

It is also worth noting the behavior of neighbouring East African countries post independence.

Julius Nyerere, first President of independent Tanganyika/Tanzania from 1962 until 1985. Suspended the Constitution making himself Executive President.

Milton Obote, first President of independent Uganda from 1962 until deposed by a military coup in 1971. Amended the Constitution making himself Executive President.

Kenneth Kaunda, first President of independent Zambia from 1964 until 1991. Banned all political parties except his own in 1968.

Hastings Banda, first President of Malawi from 1966 until 1994.................etc. etc.    

USA Urges UK Government To Deny Its People Their Right To Vote

It may come as a shock to freedom loving people around the world that the new administration in Washington DC is abandoning its historical commitment to democracy in favour of government by Executive decree.

Despite the fact that the US Constitution has served its people well for over two centuries, the people of the world can no longer regard America as the beacon of democracy and will have to get used to the brave new world of government by Executive decree.

This became hard reality when the Obama administration annihilated the GOP over the manufactured 'fiscal cliff' negotiations and in doing so set the country on a course toward European style socialism.

After the 'fiscal cliff' negotiation was over the President wasted no time informing the media and the world that he will not be having a debate with Congress over the up and coming debt ceiling limit.

The President and his administration believe that in spite of the record deficits and debts they should have unfettered power to raise the debt ceiling as and when they please. In plain language this means unlimited access to the peoples money today, tomorrow and for future generations yet unborn.

The President has indicated that he will use Executive Orders to bypass the Congress if they will not secede to his demands to raise the debt ceiling.

 If this sidelining of the people's democratic institutions isn't bad enough on the debt issue, it gets infinitely worse when  he indicated that he will use Executive Orders to bypass the Congress in order to interfere with the peoples constitutional rights under the Second Amendment.

This abandonment of the Constitution in exchange for government by Executive decree renders the Congress obsolete and after 240 years the American people's control over the way they are governed is ended.

For the long suffering peoples of Great Britain and Europe, control over their governments was ended on their accession to the Common Market in the 1970's.

Over the following decades sovereignty was further surrendered by stealth by using a series of treaties that changed the Common Market into the European Union dictatorship that we have today.

The European Union is an unelected, authoritarian dictatorship built on the failed Soviet model and like the Soviet Union power is held by an unelected Executive that cannot be removed by popular vote. The British people no longer have control over the institutions that govern their lives such as their borders, their Criminal Justice system, their working time regulations and critical areas of their economy, etc.

This system is nothing other than government by Executive decree and it has proved to be disastrous for the British people.

75% of all laws in Great Britain emanate from the European Union together with thousands of regulations that blight the lives of British Citizens on a daily basis.

The country had been changed beyond recognition and it is generally accepted that the once great global superpower is on course to becoming a third world country sooner rather than later.

As the world is aware, the European Union has been responsible for bankrupting the Mediterranean countries such as Greece causing poverty and grief for millions of its citizens, poverty which will be suffered for generations to come.

The EU is a much loved institution by the political class, they believe that its unaccountability is an advantage and when their time is up in their national legislatures there will be a well remunerated non job available for them in Brussels.

Personal fortunes are made in the European Union bureaucracy as the Kinnock family fortune demonstrates, all financed by money looted from the hard pressed taxpayer.

The European Union is a sewer of criminality and corruption who's accounts have not been signed off by an auditor for 19 straight years but that doesn't deter the fanatics who's aim is "ever closer union" to a European federal superstate run by bureaucrats in a new post democratic age.

The British people have woken up and have had enough, the vast majority of the British people want to leave this cesspit and have made their intentions clear.

The ruling political elite are losing their nerve as the British people signal their displeasure by abandoning the mainstream political parties in their droves over this issue. The United Kingdom Independence Party has seen their support increase from 4% to 14% in the past year.

All three mainstream political parties in Great Britain are run by career politicians and it is accepted that these politicians habitually lie to the people.

All three party leaders have promised a referendum on European Union membership and predictably all three have reneged on that promise after their election to office.

The current government has promised a renegotiation of membership terms and a referendum on the new terms but only after the next election.

The people will not fall for this sophistry a second time and demand for an In/Out referendum is overwhelming. Polls indicate that if a referendum were to be held in the near future the British people would vote to leave the EU a result that would signal the beginning of the end for the undemocratic, socialist monolith.

It came as a surprise to learn that the US Assistant Secretary to the UK, Mr Philip Gordon has urged the Prime Minister, David Cameron, on behalf of the Obama administration, to ignore the will of the people and deny them a referendum on their membership of the European Union.

It appears that the new administration in DC as well as showing contempt for democracy at home is encouraging the same for democracy abroad.  This is proof positive that we have at last entered the post democratic age.

Millions of people in Europe and around the world owe the American people a debt of honour for the ultimate sacrifice of their sons and daughters to free people from dictatorship and for restoring democracy in places where it has been usurped.

In years past the USA would have supported the people against an unaccountable government which was being run by Executive decree.

This administration calling for the British Executive to ignore the overwhelming will of the people is a sad development and a bad omen for things come.