Politicians Refuse to Stop the Cross-Channel Migrant Invasion

A year ago, almost to the day, the then Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, cut short his family’s Christmas holiday in South Africa and flew back to Great Britain to deal personally with an urgent immigration crisis.

Increasing numbers of economic migrants, mainly young males from Iran and Afghanistan, were crossing the English Channel in small boats and rubber dinghies from France in order to illegally enter Great Britain and join the welfare benefits free-for-all or to join the Islamic jihad.

In the year following Javid’s personal intervention in this so-called emergency, or ‘major incident’ as he called it, channel crossings have more than doubled. This begs the question; what action did he take, if any, or did Javid sacrifice his family holiday in a cynical headline grabbing publicity stunt designed to appease the restless anti-mass immigration British public?

The yawning chasm between the political class and the people is at its widest on the issue of open border mass immigration and imposed multi-culturalism. Imposing a so-called ‘multi-cultural society’ is a fig leaf cover for cultural replacement which is the declared goal of the United Nations (UN) and its bastard offspring, the European Union (EU).  

In the simplest of terms, the people want mass immigration and cultural replacement stopped but the political class and the globalist ruling elite do not. Moreover, they will do everything in their power to keep it going as long as possible until the tipping point is reached making cultural replacement irreversible.

Crushed by rigidly policed political correctness and threats of prosecution, the British people have watched as every village, town and city has been blighted and changed beyond recognition by the mass influx of incompatible migrants from the undeveloped world who refuse to integrate.

Furthermore, many migrants not only refuse to integrate but openly demand that the British people change their way of life to accommodate theirs. Religious zealots among the immigrant community have committed mass murder in order to impose their culture, beliefs and way of life on the host nation.

Opposition to open border mass immigration and imposed multi-culturalism was one of the main drivers of Brexit but the political class still took no action other than to prevent the country from leaving the EU. 

Politicians claim their hands are tied by the free movement of people demanded by the European Union but that is a weak excuse since they have always had total control of non-EU immigration but still did nothing to stem the flow.

Prime Ministers and their Home Secretaries since the Blair/Brown administration have promised to take firm action to halt mass immigration and the descent of Great Britain into third world status, but they always renege on those promises.

When she was the Home Secretary Theresa May promised to implement government policy and reduce annual immigration numbers from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands.

After six years as Home Secretary, and three more as Prime Minister, she took no action other than make more promises on immigration she knew she would not deliver.

Mrs. May's refusal to act has resulted in immigration numbers increasing to record levels which are unsustainable since it has resulted in a chronic shortage of housing, health care provision, school places, transportation, jobs, money and other physical and social infrastructure.

The treacherous Mrs. May was replaced by Sajid Javid who carried on where his predecessor left off with promises of action but delivering nothing other than virtue signaling and headline grabbing publicity stunts.

To the dismay of many Sajid Javid, a life-long Europhile who switched to Brexit when it looked like his side was losing, is now the Chancellor of the Exchequer in charge of the nations’ finances. He is also being touted or groomed as Great Britain’s first Muslim Prime Minister, but I digress.

The hopes and morale of the British people has been raised by the election of Boris Johnson and his appointment of the tough talking Priti Patel as his Home Secretary. They are making impressive noises about a new immigration system based on the Australian points system but only time will tell if this tough talking will be turned into effective action and not reneged upon as in the past.

To conclude, the British people are giving the new Johnson administration the benefit of the doubt that the promises that were routinely broken in the past will be kept and the issue of mass immigration which has caused so much damage to the British people and their way of life will finally be dealt with in their favour and their dignity as people returned.

Related articles:

Selfless Politician Saves England From Iranian Refugee Crisis.

'Get a grip': Sajid Javid flies back from holiday as English Channel migrant crisis mounts.

Migrants crossing the English Channel.

Trump Hatred - Disrespecting The American People And Taking Them For Fools

The manufactured hysteria being whipped up around the world against President Trump under the pretext of a cruel immigration ban exposes not only the power of the global media machine but the determination of the global elite to prevent him from governing and putting a halt to their ‘fundamental transformation’ agenda.

It also exposes the lies, deceit and dirty tricks they employ, along with using embedded corrupt public
officials, including the judiciary, to prevent the President from fulfilling his campaign promise to keep the American people safe.

His Executive Order (EO) to put in place a temporary ban on immigration from seven America hating, terrorist infested countries which were highlighted by the intelligence agencies under the Obama administration has been variously described as an immigrant ban, a Muslim ban and the more emotion triggering ‘refugee ban’ which was designed to wind up the snowflakes and bring them onto the streets in protest.

To the mature, emotionally stable and informed members of the populace none of these are true, the EO is exactly what it says it is; a temporary ban on immigration from these hideous places until proper vetting procedures can be put in place that weeds out the terrorists and anyone else that despises America, does not share it’s values and hates its people and their way of life.

The campaign promise to deport illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes including drug smuggling, rape and murder is also being misrepresented in order to stir up emotions and hatred for President Trump.

The policy of deporting foreign criminals and illegal immigrants has long been Federal law which has not been enforced by previous agenda driven administrations. President Trump is doing the job he was elected to do by enforcing a law that already exists.

Like the rest of the propaganda campaign, the charge that he is intentionally targeting ‘law abiding’ illegals and deliberately splitting up families is designed to stir up the emotions of the feeble minded and foster hatred.

Incidentally, since there are no restrictions on anyone leaving the country to join a deported miscreant; no families are being deliberately torn asunder; it is a simple matter of priorities and personal choice for the families concerned.

The United States of America is no different to any other country on the planet by having immigration laws which include visa requirements, a naturalization process, rules on citizenship and most importantly penalties for illegal entry and visa overstaying along with criteria for deportation.

Judging by the chorus of opprobrium directed at the United States and President Trump from around the world it would appear that they, and only they, are inhumane for having the same laws as everyone else. America and President Trump must be the only country in world that are castigated and vilified for enforcing the law of the land. 

Mexico and its President attract no such opprobrium even though their immigration laws and
deportation procedures are stricter than those of its northern neighbor.

These laws include:

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society.

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country.

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned.

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported and/or imprisoned as felons.

Under Mexican law illegal immigration is a felony.

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law.

The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens from partaking in the country’s political life.

The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. (See here)

Although he has suggested no such thing President Trump has been vilified for the idea that anywhere between three and ten million illegal immigrants may be deported, however President Narendra Modi of India, a staunch ally and trading partner of the USA, suffers no such vilification for his country’s policy to deport some twenty million illegal immigrants back to Bangladesh.

These deportations are to prevent the Muslim immigrants out-breeding the locals and depriving them of their identity and, horror of horrors, to prevent terrorists infiltrating India among the immigrant flow.

As I know from personal experience strict conditions apply for any foreigner wanting to live and work in India and despite the fact that Indians have become citizens in countries around the world, Indian citizenship is only available to those of Indian origin. (See here and here)

In a similar vein Kenya is planning to deport four hundred and twenty-five thousand Somali ‘refugees’, without any global hysteria, because the invaders are ‘a breeding ground for terrorism and an economic burden’.

The global propaganda machine has ‘blacked out this news because it undermines the ‘Somali refugee’ narrative promoted in the west and because it’s a black state doing the expelling, instead of a European state’. (Read the article here).

Another example of immigration and deportation requirements that are stricter than those of the USA is NATO ally and prospective member of the European Union, Turkey.

They will deport foreigners who:

Use false information and fraudulent documents in procedures concerning entry into Turkey.

Who make a living through illegitimate means during their stay in Turkey.

Who exceed the duration of visa or visa exemption more than ten days, or who’s visa has been cancelled.

Who are identified as having been working without a work permit.
(See here)

One final example to illustrate the sheer hypocrisy of those that feign uproar at President Trump’s Executive Order is the case of the American born Muslim convert, Abdulakim Mujahid Mohammad. He is the perpetrator of the terrorist outrage in Little Rock, Arkansas in 2009 where one person was killed and another injured.

Mohammad traveled to Yemen in 2007 ostensibly to teach English but was deported for overstaying his visa and not having the correct government travel permits. He was also in possession of a fake Somali passport.

It’s more than ironic that an American citizen was jailed and deported from one of the proscribed countries for overstaying his visa and not having the required documentation. What’s even more ironic is that Mohammad had married a local Yemeni woman, therefore his deportation split up his family.

And so it goes on and on. Immigration and deportation procedures from allies, trading partners and enemies alike that are equal if not stricter than those of the USA but do not attract the vilification and hysteria from the global media or from foreign leaders who enforce the law of their own land but criticize President Trump for doing the same.

In conclusion: By continually vilifying and criticizing their choice of President and his commitment to enforce the law of the land like any other responsible President or Prime Minister, the American people are being disrespected and taken for mugs and fools.

America is well capable of surviving on its own, it doesn’t need the rest of the world so who could blame them if they pulled up the drawbridge, secured fortress America and gave us all the middle finger.

Canadian immigration article here

Immigration pitfalls in Indonesia here

  

In A Dangerous World Extreme Vetting Should Be Standard Procedure

When Presidential candidate Donald Trump mentioned 'extreme vetting' as part of his plan to keep the American people safe it would have rung a bell with visitors to the USA in the recent past who would have gone through a form of 'extreme vetting' as a routine procedure.

Even tourists from friendly countries indulging in nothing more sinister than a visit to Disneyland with the kids were required to sign the declaration on Form I-94 declaring membership or affiliation, past or present, with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party.

Even advocating communism or the establishment of a totalitarian dictatorship by utterance or by written or printed matter would have put any visit to the USA in jeopardy. (See the requirements below)

Those were the good old days when the United States of America was a beacon of light in the dark age of the cold war, when it was acknowledged as the 'shining city on a hill'  that gave hope to all those unfortunate people on earth who were being crushed under the yoke of communism and other totalitarian regimes, including those unfortunates forced to live under barbaric sharia law.

These common sense requirements not only went some way to keeping the American people safe as they went about their daily lives but they helped to 'secure the Blessings of Liberty for themselves and their Posterity'.

Why these requirements were abandoned or relaxed is a mystery that requires justification from those responsible; what is not a mystery however is the fact that the American people are less safe today as a result and the 'Blessing of Liberty are no longer secure for themselves or their posterity.

If these requirements had remained in force, combined with background checks for anyone from anti-western regimes or meeting the criteria listed below, then maybe the Boston Marathon bombers and the female half of the San Bernardino killers would have been denied entry to the USA and innocent American lives saved.

The America of today is much altered from the country of a decade or so ago when the stricter requirements for visitors were in force. Communist politicians have come out of the shadows and now run towns, cities and entire states much to the detriment of the people.

In a development that would have been unthinkable a generation ago, a member of the 'progressive' community - an umbrella term used by socialists, communists and liberals -  has been in residence in the White House for two terms with a replacement from the same community, Hillary Clinton, ready to continue the promised 'fundamental transformation' of America should she defeat Mr.Trump.

It's not just communists, socialists, liberals or 'progressives' that are destroying traditional America. Republican politicians in local and state legislatures as well as Congress have stood idly by as the entry requirements were relaxed and the borders thrown open to all and sundry.

Even now many Republicans are proposing to reward law breaking by giving amnesty to illegal immigrants, including some individuals who have committed serious crimes against law abiding American citizens.

As a consequence of this tacit compliance many US cities are infested with Muslim ghettos where the majority of the inhabitants reject the US Constitution preferring instead to live under sharia law.

With the connivance of a malevolent, anti-American political class these ghettos, along with many other ethnic ghettos, are being given immunity from the law and any Constitutional requirements while being expanded using unsecured borders, mass immigration and amnesty.

The existence of illegal entities such as so-called sanctuary cities prove beyond doubt that compliance with the law of the land is no longer required by these preferred groups or the agenda driven political class.

Law enforcement agencies, its officers and border guards have been rendered impotent whereby they are forbidden from doing the job they have hired to do and sworn an oath to perform.

The downward spiral of American towns and cities into mediocrity and decay is palpable and if the current 'progressive' regime perpetuates itself at the next general election the entire country will suffer a similar fate.

The proposal by Donald Trump to institute extreme vetting is nothing revolutionary or new but a return to some of the common sense requirements that have helped to keep the American people safe in the past, not only from the communist yoke but from radical Islam and its intent to rape, maim and kill innocent Americans in its name.  

Section 313(a)(2) of the Act specifically bars the naturalization of a person who has been or is a member of the Communist Party. See also section 316(a)(3) of the Act and 8 CFR 316.11 which require that the applicant, during the statutory period, “has been and still is a person … attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States.” An applicant cannot be naturalized if he or she has been or is a member of the Communist Party, unless he or she falls under sections 313(d) or 313(e) of the Act. For further information regarding Communism and attachment to the Constitution or favorable disposition towards good order and happiness refer to Interpretations 313.1 and 313.2 .

Generally, an applicant is ineligible for naturalization if he or she was a member of the Communist Party, unless he or she qualifies for an exception. Section 313 of the Act and 8 CFR 313.2 describe ineligibility for naturalization resulting from Communist Party membership. Except as provided in section 313(d) of the Act and 8 CFR 313.3 , no applicant for naturalization shall be naturalized as a citizen of the United States if, within ten years immediately preceding the filing of an application for naturalization or after such filing but before taking the oath of citizenship, such applicant:

• Is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party; or

• Is or has advocated communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship; or

• Is or has been a member of or affiliated with an organization that advocates communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, either through its own utterance or through any written or printed matter published by such organization; or

• Is or has been a subversive, or a member of, or affiliated with, a subversive organization; or

• Knowingly is publishing or has published any subversive written or printed matter, or written or printed matter advocating communism; or

• Knowingly circulates or has circulated, or knowingly possesses or has possessed for the purpose of circulating, subversive written or printed matter, or written or printed matter advocating communism; or

• Is or has been a member of, or affiliated with, any organization that publishes or circulates, or that possesses for the purpose of publishing or circulating, any subversive written or printed matter, or any written or printed matter advocating communism.

Engineered Immigration Crisis - British Disease Reaches America

As the United States of America prepares to celebrate its independence from Great Britain, it's former colonial ruler is engaged in a life or death struggle of its own trying to free itself from an imperial tyranny that threatens its very existence.

As part of it's project to rid the world of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture and its traditional way of life, the European Union Lodge of the global elite have chosen open border mass immigration as its weapon of choice. Combined with rigidly enforced political correctness, carried out with religious fervor by the politicised institutions, the project is rolling relentlessly on and it will soon pass the tipping point from which there will be no return.

This cultural replacement project was long in the planning and although its implementation had been slowly carried out by governments of all colours, its progress took on a new momentum with the accession of new countries into the EU combined with the election of Tony Blair's Labour government in 1997. Immigration needed to be sped up in order for the tipping point to be reached before another Thatcher type conservative took control and derailed the project, possibly putting it into reverse.

Blair's government proceeded to send emissaries to all corners of the world encouraging people to come to Great Britain with promises of free housing, education, health care and welfare cash benefits. They also enshrined the European Union Human Rights disaster into British law making deportation unlikely no matter what crimes were committed.
( See an immigrant recruitment story here)

The rest is history and is there for all to see. Great Britain is no longer the country it was a decade ago and is now so degraded it has more in common with the third world from whence many of its new citizens came.

The global elite need not have worried because after Blair political power in Great Britain was usurped by their own candidate, the self proclaimed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron. He has made sure that the cultural replacement project remains firmly on course.

Despite his promises to curb mass immigration and to make Great Britain unattractive to welfare colonists and other economic migrants, he continues to encourage it and promote the mythical 'multi-cultural society' over the indigenous people's tradition way of life.

From his prosperous mono-cultural, white, Anglo-Saxon enclave in Whitney, Oxfordshire, David Cameron plans to shame British businesses into employing more ethnic minority workers while at the same time whinging and whining that Parliament is too white.

While cultural replacement is one of the prime reasons for open border mass immigration, demographic replacement is a another one. Immigrants traditionally vote for left of centre candidates therefore right of centre governments will be a thing of the past when electoral benefits are handed out.

The American people are currently having an immigration disaster of their own but they have not yet cottoned on to how this is coming about and for what reason.

It is being labelled as a crisis and in some quarters as a humanitarian crisis but, as it was in Great Britain, this has been long in the planning with a defined objective of demographic replacement.

The spin operation by the government-media complex around this engineered crisis is so blatantly obvious its embarrassing.

It is being reported that the word is being put out in Central American countries such as Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, that immigrants, particularly children, will not be deported. Simultaneous to this, the word is being put out in the USA that these are unfortunates fleeing drug gangs and violence in their home countries.

It shouldn't take a genius to work out just who is putting the word out and for what reason. Only the 'progressive' left benefits from mass third world immigration and the current Obama administration is about as 'progressive' left as it's possible to be.

The British government admits it sent recruitment parties around the world to entice immigrants into Great Britain knowing that it would make it difficult for British people to find work. This also gives some indication of the low regard and high contempt with which the British government held its own people.
(Read the contemptible story here)

If fleeing violence and drug gangs is a legitimate reason to enter the USA then the entire populations of these countries should be allowed to enter together with those from Colombia, Mexico, Afghanistan and a hundred other violent narco states.

I warned back in 2008 and again in 2012 during the Presidential elections that mass immigration and amnesty will be on Obama's agenda for the purpose of altering the demographic balance in favour of left of centre governments.

This deliberate encouragement of mass immigration was a precursor to the much vaunted immigration reform proposals. Suddenly, with his second term drawing to a close, President Obama is bypassing Congress in order to fulfill his obligation to the global elite by giving amnesty, disguised as a 'path to citizenship', to twelve million or so illegals and there will never be a right of centre government in the USA again.

Candidate Obama promised during his first election campaign to 'fundamentaly transform' America and this project will be complete once immigration reform is implemented. After that, the once great United States of America will join the once 'Great' Britain in the history books as just another former superpower that destroyed itself and rotted from the inside out.

                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------


I will be spending the rest of the week celebrating July 4th with my American family and friends camping and floating the Huzza river in Missouri. I will try and lay off the politics but can't promise anything.

Welfare And Sham Marriage - They Go Together Like A Horse And Carriage

 

                                                           


While the salaries, pensions and savings of the British people are continuing to shrink, one thing that never seems to shrink is the number of people rolling up to claim their welfare 'entitlements'. Whether they are legally entitled to other peoples money doesn't appear to bother their conscience in the slightest.

It doesn't seem to bother the collective conscience of Great Britain's inexperienced Prime Minister, David Cameron either or his equally inexperienced cronies in government.  But then again, when cultural replacement via open border mass immigration is the 'unofficial', official policy why should they care, they are achieving what they set out to do.

It goes without saying that Great Britain's welfare system is one of the most generous on planet.  It also goes without saying that it's purpose has been deliberately changed from a safety net, paid for by the sweat and toil of the British people, to a free for all for anyone who can sneak through the intentionally porous borders.

The then unelected President of the European Union, Herman von Rompuy, ordered David Cameron to make sure the British people's welfare 'entitlements' remain available to all EU citizens and illegal immigrants alike. This was to include the vilest of criminals, who cannot be deported under the EU's pernicious Human Rights law.

The rule of thumb for welfare colonists is this; once you have evaded the half asleep border guards, you've made it, you are in, and the chances are that you are in for good, then it's a free for all with British taxpayers money.

As a form of insurance, the illegal immigrant should knock up a local girl and father a child; that child will then act as an anchor baby.  Since the deliberate moral degradation of Great Britain there are plenty of willing old slappers who are only too happy to bear a child just for the extra child benefit allowance and the chance of a bigger council house.

Before the disastrous Blair government threw open the borders to all and sundry, getting access to the British peoples welfare entitlements was a tad more difficult.  Prospective economic migrants and welfare colonists would indulge in sham marriages with British women for a fee.  Once the marriage documents were secured, the couple separated and the immigrant disappeared into the underclass to carry on their chosen way of life, often criminal, financed by the British taxpayer.

These sham marriages were a trickle that turned into a raging flood after the Tony Blair government opened up the British people's welfare safety net to EU citizens.  When these are added to the child bride scandal of the Asian communities, marriage has become the access key to the British peoples welfare system for hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of foreign people who have not paid into the system.

The child bride scandal involves young girls who hold British passports, being forced to marry older males, often relatives, from their ancestral village back in the home country; this entitles a whole new group of relatives to relocate to Great Britain and climb aboard the welfare gravy train.

The issue of sham marriages and the access of immigrants to welfare, and to all the other social services for that matter, became one of the biggest concerns of the British people.  These concerns would normally be studiously ignored by the political class but because they were having a negative effect on Cameron's re-election chances, he decided to make a few promises that he had no intention of keeping.

In October 2011 David Cameron announced he was listening to the British people and as a result he was going to tackle the issues and make it more difficult for sham and forced marriages to succeed as a gateway to the welfare system.

Cameron cited the example of a Pakistani man who obtained a spousal visa when he married a compatriot who had settled in Great Britain.  Once the visa was obtained he divorced the wife, returned to Pakistan where he remarried then applied for entry for his new spouse and her family.
(Story here)

This kind of abuse has been going on for decades and ignored by governments of all colours, therefore it should be apparent to all and sundry that he has been forced to act only because the issue was negatively affecting his re-election chances.

It must be reiterated that David Cameron is a career politician with absolutely no experience in the real world.  After a couple of years as a Public Relations executive for a failed television company he moved into party politics.

Apparently he was spotted as a potential leader while at University and groomed thereafter for leadership. Spotted and groomed by who is a mystery.  Whatever skills Cameron possessed after his 'grooming', it is obvious that telling the truth to the people wasn't one of them.  He is a consummate spinner, deceiver and outright liar.  Like Blair before him, everything he says has been calculated for the sole purpose of gaining political advantage.

Cameron announced his plan in October 2011; in October 2013 the situation is much worse.  One in five marriages are a sham and twenty percent of urban marriages are bogus.  Bearing in mind that legislation to deal with bogus marriages was first introduced in 2004, it is obvious that governments are not serious about ending it.
(Story here)

Previously, prospective economic migrants and welfare colonists had to find or bribe a British lady in order to gain access to the welfare gravy train; since the EU has ordered Cameron to keep the system available to all EU citizens this is no longer a requirement.

We now have a  Pakistani man marrying a Czech woman and a Pakistani man marrying a Latvian woman to gain access to the British peoples welfare system.
(Story here)

Then there is the Sri Lankan man marrying an Italian woman for the same reason.
(Story here)

In clear demonstration of the governments contempt for its own people, the men were detained for possible deportation, which experience tells us won't happen, and the women were released without charge. These attempts to defraud the taxpayer were premeditated crimes against the British people and they went unpunished.

The government now has a plan to introduce a small charge if foreigners use the British people's National Health Service but experts have issued warning that this will open the floodgates to criminal gangs.
(Story here)

These gangs already fly pregnant women from Africa to have their babies on the NHS. This is now such a big business it has been named 'the Lagos Shuttle' by health service staff.
(Story here)

If the government cannot put a stop to this flagrant abuse and govern in the interests of the British people, then this raises several important questions:

a) These are career politicians and bureaucrats, does their inexperience translate into incompetence?

b) Have they surrendered so much sovereignty to the European Union and the United Nations that they no longer have enough power to govern Great Britain in the interests of its people?

c) Are they consciously imposing an agenda dictated by these two foreign institutions?

d) Does this agenda include cultural replacement in Great Britain? (This is called de-homogenizing in UN/EU jargon)

Looking at the actions of the political class and their attendant army of career bureaucrats, the answer to all four questions is a resounding 'Yes' demonstrating once and for all that whatever they say, the politicians have no intention of ending welfare colonization or economic migration in general.

Update: Muslims can claim welfare benefits for four wives.
(Story here)

This is an edited repost.

Illegal Immigrant Spot Checks, Racial Profiling And The Human Rights Industry

News that the United Kingdom Border Agency have stepped up the hunt for illegal immigrants by using spot checks raised the blood pressure of those who make a living on the publicly funded human rights gravy train and it also sent the politically correct thought police of the grievance and self loathing communities into fits of apoplexy.

It is obviously beyond the comprehension of these people that securing the borders and dealing with illegal immigration is the whole point of a border agency. Due to the deliberate scrapping of border controls by the previous Labour government, immigration, and particularly, illegal immigration, is now one of the major issues concerning the British people. Not only are their lives being blighted by crime and disorder, their public services and the economy at large are being adversely affected by this massive influx of economic migrants and criminal gangs.

The self loathing community in addition to the human rights and grievance industries cannot be over endowed with political savvy if they haven't realized by now that these spot checks are window dressing designed to give the impression that the government is acting on the people's concerns ahead of the European elections due in 2014.

Do these people really think that a few border control officers checking random people at a handful of railway stations is going to deal with an estimated one million illegal immigrants? It makes great headlines and it gives the hideously biased BBC plenty of ammunition but it is not going to make the smallest dent in the problem of illegal immigrants.

Myself and other informed punters do not agree with government spot checks because the political class will not miss an opportunity to extend this authoritarian practice to all citizens in the future. They have already tried ID cards, universal DNA databases and car number plate recognition in an attempt to monitor and control its citizens. They are currently busy attempting to control the press and the Internet together with snooping on private emails and phone calls.

Resorting to spot checks is an admission of failure; illegals immigrants should be stopped at the border.

But I digress; it's not the spot checks that send these various 'progressive' industries rushing to the BBC and the media but the thought of racial profiling. To these over sensitive souls, racial profiling is one of the biggest crimes that can possibly be committed against their imagined egalitarian, fair and equal, politically correct Utopia.

To rest of us in the real world it's just plain common sense. If the authorities are looking for Muslim terrorists they don't stop Roman Catholic nuns, if they are looking for illegals from Africa, India or China, stopping Europeans is likely to prove fruitless. Black people can be excluded if the police are searching for a white bank robber, dwarfs can be excluded if the robber is over five feet tall, women can be excluded if it's a man. Stopping a black female dwarf would be deemed 'the right thing to do' in the insane tick box world of politically correct tokenism.

To the human rights mob, the self loathers and the grievance mongers, this point of view is the ultimate heresy and I should, no doubt, be called a racist and cast into the outer darkness for all eternity for expressing such unacceptable views.

The sad fact is that the public sector together with all the British institutions from the police and the BBC down to the smallest Parish councils, are infested with these self righteous, self appointed guardians of the 'progressive', politically correct, multi-cultural agenda who have been enabled by legislation.

Two of the most destructive pieces of legislation put in place by the Blair/Brown government that have done more to destroy Great Britain than any other are the unnecessary Human Rights Act and the unwanted Equalities Act.

To enforce these two agenda driven laws, the government set up the Orwellian Equalities and Human Rights Commission and then proceeded to stuff it with like minded agenda driven bureaucrats who were committed to the cultural replacement project. This bureaucracy is unwanted by the British people and has been a disaster from its inception.  It has acquired a reputation for lunacy and it is now being seen for what it actually is.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission is a vehicle used by the politician class to impose their 'progressive' multi-cultural agenda onto the British people who didn't ask for it and don't want it.

Calls for it to be scrapped should be heeded but, as they made abundantly clear, Prime Minister David Cameron and his bag carrier Nick Clegg have no intention of doing so regardless of what the people think.

A fair days work for a fair days pay was the most common mantra for my generation, there was no need and certainly no demand for human rights or equality legislation. These were the brainchild of the remote metropolitan elite who were bent on imposing their vision of a fair and equal, multi-cultural society onto the people whether they wanted it or not.

Its worth concluding with a few quotes from John Deighan, the leader of the Roman Catholic church in Scotland, after the battle over homosexual marriage:

The Commission "is becoming a pressure group intent on imposing the views of the social elites who have worked to redefine human rights to suit their lifestyles".

"the EHRC has become a partisan player in human rights campaigning".

Finally the one that sums it up for many:

"Our society is badly in need of an objective and measured assessment of human rights and equality issues especially as we see the crushing of religious freedom when views are held not to be in keeping with politically correct diktats".

Rewarding Criminals - Mayor of London Wants Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants

Just as his star was rising in the heavens and he was setting out his stall for a possible leadership challenge for the Conservative Party, Mayor of London Boris Johnson, shows his contempt for the majority of the British people by calling for an amnesty for illegal immigrants.

It seems to be that the modern political elite have a death wish as they appear to take delight in upsetting the British people by always proposing policies that are diametrically opposed to what they want.

Boris Johnson was burnishing his credentials for a shot at the leadership by touting a credible alternative to the media created PR Prime Minister 'Call Me Dave' Cameron. This shouldn't be difficult as 'Dave' has proved himself to be a remote chinless wonder, who is determined to push the trendy 'progressive' agenda so beloved of his metropolitan elitist chums.

It is now universally accepted that open border mass immigration has been a disaster for the ordinary people of Great Britain in terms of jobs, low wages, access to low cost housing, schools, health care etc. plus the general downgrading of British values that have been forced on the people without their consent.

Far from the peaceful, multi-cultural utopia that Johnson and his ilk would have the world believe, London, the capital city of what once was the greatest nation on earth, is now a cesspit of crime infested, mono-cultural ghettos from Brick Lane, Tower Hamlets, Broadwater Farm to the Sharia controlled Muslim ghettos around Finsbury Park. Non British and their descendants will soon form the majority of London's population if they don't already.

With unemployment standing at 9.1% the jobless people of London, particularly the young, do not want any further immigration at all let alone an amnesty for illegal immigrants.

The only people who benefit from third world mass immigration are unscrupulous businessmen using cheap labour to boost their profits and the political low lifes who are spinning that the stuffy British and their boring lives are being enriched in order to justify their cultural replacement agenda.

Boris Johnson is well aware that amnesty for illegal immigrants would be yet another disaster for the British people. Italy granted amnesty to 119,000 illegals in 1988, when the exercise was repeated in 2002 the number had risen to 700,000. Similarly Spain granted amnesty to 44,000 in 1985 which rose to 700,000 in 2005.

The disaster would be even worse for Great Britain with its estimated 1 million+ illegal immigrants.

The key word used to describe the people in question is illegal. Has Boris Johnson and the political elite redefined the word to mean something else?

Entering the country illegally and breaking visa requirements means that the perpetrators have broken the law, as have bank robbers, burglars, thieves, muggers, rapists and murderers.

The political low lifes need to understand just as the British people understand, illegal means just that...illegal!

Politicians do not have the authority to order those responsible for upholding the law to ignore law breaking when it suits their political agenda. Any police officer or border control agent who turns a blind eye to illegal immigration are breaking the law themselves just as if they turned a blind eye to a bank robbery.

In this age of equality, an amnesty for law breaking illegal immigrants must be extended to all law breakers. The state cannot reward one sector of the law breaking community without rewarding all the others.

Boris Johnson is not alone, the political elite in the United States are pulling the same stunt, only on a much bigger scale. The disaster about to be unleashed on our American cousins will be life changing.

Rewarding 11 million law breaking, illegal immigrants with amnesty will ensure the end of the Republican Party and with it the prospect individual liberty for all and it would herald the end of constitutionally limited government.

Boris Johnson, like 'Dave', does not have to suffer the consequences of the policies they put in place for the rest of the people. No Sharia controlled Muslim ghettos for them or their spawn, no Romanian gypsy camps in Whitney, Henley or Islington, no war experienced Somali youths stealing their taxpayer funded limousines and plotting to join the jihad in Mogadishu.

This enforced cultural enrichment is for the little people and according to the political shysters that rule their lives, they had better get used to it and stop whining.

The political class is out of control and as a result they have become arrogant and dismissive of the public they are paid to serve.

The only peaceful way to shock some sense into these people is to put an end to their cushy life. This can be achieved by rejecting the historical political parties and voting out the time serving incumbents. The useless buggers can then be replaced with locally selected political alternatives.

In my case that will be UKIP.

Homosexual Marriage, Amnesty For Illegals - Fundamental Transformation Gathers Pace

It comes as no surprise to informed opinion that the promised fundamental transformation of the United States of America would gather pace as the 'Progressive in Chief' entered his second term as President.

Barack Hussein Obama has little over three years left to achieve the goal of the total destruction of traditional America and its replacement with a dumbed down, egalitarian, gender neutral and godless Dystopia that is so beloved by so called 'progressives'.

It must be said that Bath House Barry has done a great job so far, by the fact that he has done almost as much damage in little over 4 years that took the Blair/Brown/Cameron 'progressive' alliance 16 years to achieve in Great Britain.

With the economies and industrial bases of both countries wrecked, the 'progressive' political elite have turned their attention to the issues that will ensure the fundamental transformation will be permanent.

From the beginning of recorded history marriage has always meant a union between a man and a woman, and it is this union that as formed the bedrock of the same civilized society that went on to become successful and prosperous. This definition of marriage has been accepted as the norm for all sections of society regardless of class, religion or ethnic origin.

It cannot be denied that intellectual and moral standards have declined immeasurably with the decline, among other things, of traditional marriage. It also cannot be denied that ending traditional marriage will have a dramatic negative effect on the way society will evolve in future.

Because re-defining traditional marriage will have such negative consequences for the culture of the country, the majority of people believe that the political elite have no right to re-define it without consultation.

This is nothing new where our politicians are concerned. When did this arrogant elite ever pay any attention to what the people think?

The Supreme Courts' recent decisions paving the way for the ending of traditional marriage in the United States follows hot on the heels of the British and French government's despicable behavior of ramming the same through their respective Parliaments. This issue was not in any pre-election manifesto so why the urgency now when there are so many other serious issues that require the attention of our tribunes?

The media whores, including the taxpayer funded BBC, who are in the pockets of the political elite, studiously ignored or played down the fact that hundreds of thousands of demonstrators flooded the streets of Paris in defence of traditional marriage.

Their argument that ending traditional marriage is a simple matter of equality and inclusivity is risible by the fact that other groups of sexual deviants are excluded.

Although marriage between close relatives is acceptable among the Muslim and other communities, it has not, to my knowledge, extended to brother and sister. If its a simple matter of equality then brother and sister who are genuinely in love should be allowed to marry and by extension so should beastials. Paedophiles should also be included when the government finally grants their wish to lower the age of consent to 12 or lower.

The transformational effect of ending traditional marriage, as serious as it is, will be surpassed in severity by the granting of amnesty to illegal immigrants.

The policy of open border mass immigration was put in place by the 'progressive' Blair/Brown government in Great Britain, to facilitate their dream of cultural replacement. This policy is being continued by the equally 'progressive' Conservative/Liberal coalition. Their oft repeated soundbite of "cutting net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands" will have no effect whatsoever on cultural replacement.

Their perverted belief that the Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture of Great Britain is the root of all the evil in the world, including Imperialism and Capitalism, is a core tenet of their 'progressive' religion.

Their deceitful modus operundi has been copied with enthusiasm across the Atlantic by the 'Progressive' in Chief.

The normal system of immigration by which prospective immigrants would subject themselves to scrutiny then apply for work permits/visas with the aim of eventual citizenship, is much too slow and therefore does not lend itself to cultural replacement. The current dishonest system of turning a blind eye to visa abuse and illegal immigration then granting amnesty is much faster.

If anyone is under the impression that this policy of cultural replacement is exclusive to the 'progressive' socialist elite, they should look at the evidence. The push for amnesty for illegals in the USA and Great Britain includes prominent conservatives such as Marco Rubio, John McCain and in Great Britain, the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson.

Fundamental Transformation of western civilization is the goal and when America and Great Britain fall the game is over for the peoples of the world. The aim of the global political elite is a godless, gender neutral world where everyone (except themselves) are equal. I am only glad I won't be around to see it.

Illegal Immigrant Amnesty Is Now Wrong. Child Abuse To Remain A Shared Value

When politicians abandon their long standing positions and start aligning themselves with the people, it's a sure sign they are worried about their jobs. It's got nothing to do with their convictions, their principles or what's best for the country, it's all about them keeping their cushy, taxpayer funded jobs and imposing their will on the people.

The latest u-turn comes from Parliament's most despicable serial liar and Great Britain hater, Nick Clegg. How this appalling man came to be the Deputy Prime Minister is testament to the corrupt, undemocratic British political system and the stupidity of the electorate who repeatedly swallow his spin and deceit time and again.

For his entire miserable life this political low life has championed multi-culturalism. He has campaigned for the end of Great Britain as an independent, sovereign nation and an end to its unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture.

Nobody should be fooled into believing that Nick Clegg has 'seen the light' when he announced today that he now believes that giving amnesty to illegal immigrants is wrong. This policy was in his party's election manifesto, it is one of the core instruments he uses for the fundamental transformation of Great Britain into the egalitarian, multi-cultural society of his dreams.

'Calamity' Clegg's previous policy was for illegal immigrants to earn amnesty and British citizenship if they can stay undetected for ten years. He obviously doesn't understand the meaning of the word illegal. If there is going to be a statute of limitations for criminal behavior, why would it only apply to illegal immigration? By his own perverted logic this statute is discriminatory and exclusive because it excludes burglars, car thieves, vandals, expense cheats and Cabinet Ministers who pervert the course of justice.

Clegg now claims that his amnesty policy "risked undermining public confidence in the entire immigration system". One has to ask as to where this idiot has been since 1997 when Blair, with Clegg's approval, abandoned border controls and opened the immigration floodgates to facilitate cultural replacement and to 'rub the right's nose in diversity'.

Clegg and his gang of fundamental transformers would have us believe that this sudden change of heart is because of the lack of confidence in the immigration system and nothing to do with the up and coming European Union elections.

In a clear demonstration of Clegg's propensity for serial lying, he insisted that he would not "indulge in low populism that patronises the British people" nor would he "say things because he thinks that's what the British people want to hear" when that is exactly what he is indulging in by making this u-turn at this time.

This is patronising nonsense from Clegg and it clearly demonstrates his contempt for the British people. He is making the mistake of assuming that the entire nation is as stupid and naive as the electorate of his constituency in Sheffield.

This sudden change of heart coincides with a recent poll which puts the British people's concerns about mass immigration at the very top of their agenda.

It also coincides with the irrevocable rise of the United Kingdom Independence Party. UKIP has always proposed that the British people should regain control of their borders and put in place a moratorium on all immigration until the shambles presided over by Clegg is cleaned up.

The latest brainwave from Cameron and Clegg's incompetent government is a clear demonstration of how out of touch with the real world these people are. In order to "bring down net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands", they have announced a pilot scheme targeted at 'high risk' individuals from 'two or three nationalities'.  Relatives already in Great Britain will be required to post a bond which would be forfeited if their guests overstay their visa or use public services.

To anyone with an iota of intelligence it should be obvious that 'high risk' individuals from dodgy nationalities should not be given a visa in the first place. It should also be obvious that visitors determined to stay would be happy to forfeit a bond in exchange for a lifetime on welfare benefits.

There are currently no checks that would indicate whether an immigrant has used any public
 services. The Health Service, for instance, is universally available to everyone, no questions asked.

There is nothing in this policy to prevent a visitor who is intent on staying permanently from using the myriad of avenues available in order to prevent their deportation. This includes the hated Human Rights Act of which Clegg is the biggest supporter.

Nobody with an ounce of sense will be fooled into believing that Nick Clegg is doing anything but lying for electioneering purposes. This speech was cynically made to appease the voters' justified fears over mass immigration and to counter the ever growing threat of UKIP.

Despite this pathetic attempt at ingratiating himself with the majority of people over mass immigration, Nick Clegg let slip his true beliefs about a fundamentally transformed Great Britain. He is trying to convince the people that a multi-cultural society is a fait accompli where there is no going back, so we should just get used to it.

"For a diverse society like ours to function successfully, for different groups to integrate and co-exist, British citizens must believe that the rules by which migrants come and settle here are reasonable, and properly enforced".

Nick Clegg and his bag carriers know as well as everyone else that diverse groups such as Muslims, for example, have no intention of integrating, nor are they being encouraged to by the government to do so. In fact the opposite is true as Muslim leaders set up self governing 'no go' areas where only Sharia law applies, and this with the approval of his government.

With Clegg and his government's approval, heinous crimes by foreign cultures are being tolerated in the name of multi-culturalism, such as:

Muslim paedophile gangs and child sex abuse.

Drug abuse with it's associated violent crime by Jamaican Yardie gangs.

Slavery and people trafficking by Chinese Triad gangs.

Female genital mutilation by African tribal savages.

Female abuse inside the family by Asian cultures.

Premeditated murder, renamed 'honour' killings, by backward Eastern European and Asian cultures.

Organised crime gangs from Russia and Eastern Europe, including organised gangs of child criminals.

Institutional  or cultural corruption from Nigeria and other African countries.

Great Britain is also considered a safe haven for Muslim terrorists and torturers from despotic African regimes.

Are these the 'shared values' that multi-culturalists drone on about when they are spinning the benefits of mass immigration?

When he talks about 'shared values', Nick Clegg and his gang should point out to the British people, what exactly they are.

No matter how hard he tries or how much spin and lies he pours forth, Nick Clegg cannot hide the fact that multi-culturalism is being forced on the British people against their will because he despises the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic culture of which he has no interest.

If there is any justice in this world, traitorous people like Clegg, who have clearly committed treason, will face a day of reckoning and hopefully this will start with the fall of the European Union and his ejection from office at the next election.

With committed multi-culturalists controlling the government machine, it would appear that UKIP is now Great Britain's last hope for survival. The time has finally arrived for the British people to make a choice. Live proud, free and prosperous in the open world or poor and captive in the tyrannical EU.