To civilized people the world over there are no more heinous crimes committed than those against children. Looking after the well being and interests of children is one of the prime measures of a civilised society, therefore it is with absolute horror that one has to helplessly stand by while the political class sacrifices the well being of children in the interests of their 'progressive' agenda.
Politicians always put children at the top of their agenda when they are slagging each other off at election times by citing increases/decreases in child poverty or educational standards depending on whether it's the government in office or the opposition doing the slagging. None of them ever mentions the dramatic and shameful increase in heinous crimes against children that has taken place over the last two decades under governments of all colours.
The catalyst for this article was the 30 day sentence given to a paedophile teacher in the USA who raped a fourteen year old pupil who subsequently committed suicide as a result of her traumatic experience. In his summing up, the judge all but blamed the girl and exonerated the perpetrator. One has to ask what kind of mindset does this judge have? Why does he not take the side of the victim or at least acknowledge that a terrible crime has been committed against a child and act accordingly?
(Story here)
By his actions this judge is treating this crime the same as the rape of an adult and is therefore normalizing paedophilia in the justice system and in the public psyche.
Further research reveals that this is not the isolated actions of a rogue judge but one of the fundamental aims of the global 'progressive' movement who's history of paedophilia goes back to the Bloomsbury Group and the Fabian Society, together with the Labour and Liberal Parties.
Since it was taken over and 'modernised' by David Cameron and his inner circle of remote, trendy elitists, these 'progressive' ideas have also infested the British Conservative Party in addition to the Democratic Party in the USA.
Even a cursory glance into the Bloomsbury Group shines a light on the history of the 'progressive' movement and reveals the origin of the descent into depravity which we see taking place today. It was a gathering of influential so called intellectuals, including artists, economists and politicians who believed that a 'progressive' socialist society should consider acts of sexual depravity, including those with children, as normal.
Influential people such as John Maynard Keynes, Lytton Strachey, Havelock Ellis and Bertrand Russell considered themselves to be 'progressive' and all were drug addicts, perverts and pederasts. They all had a penchant for sodomy, young boys and each other; they despised Christianity and any other form or morality. These people were depravity personified and agitated for the normalization of homosexuality and sex between adults and children.
(Story here)
It would appear that Keynesian economics is accompanied by Keynesian perversion and depravity.
These words of Fabian Society founder, Havelock Ellis, would not be out of place today if spoken by David Cameron, Barack Obama or any other 'progressive'. "Love transcends age as well as gender".
(A Fabian Story here)
One only has to look back at the recent past to see the British political establishments' acceptance of paedophilia and child abuse.
The Liberal party's high profile Member of Parliament for Rochdale, Cyril Smith was a serial child abuser and paedophile. This fact was kept from the public by an evil conspiracy between the police and the political establishment including military intelligence. With this protection, the degenerate Smith went on to enjoy a long parliamentary career and therefore with the full knowledge of the establishment children kept being horrifically abused.
(Story here)
Even today the Liberal Democrat MP and self confessed child abuser, Mike Hancock, is still in office funded by the taxpayers. Not only is he a Member of Parliament, he is also on the local government gravy train as a councillor. The people in his constituency should hang their heads in shame.
(Story here)
There can be no bigger example of the political establishments' acceptance of child sex abuse than the Muslim paedophile scandals that have rocked so many of Great Britain's cities. The horrific child sex abuse scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale and Oxford were shocking, not only for the nature of the crimes but by their acceptance by the authorities and their subsequent cover ups.
These heinous crimes not only went on with the full knowledge of the local authorities including local politicians, teachers, social workers and the police, they were actually enabled by the willful participation by these same institutions. After years of foot dragging and excuses, no one at this point has been held responsible, disciplined, fired or prosecuted.
After national publicity and pressure from the public, investigative inquiries are now being set up and the political establishment are in a panic to make sure their ars*es are covered by limiting the terms of reference of these inquiries, then running away.
Incidentally it's worth noting that the political establishment's spin machines in Rotherham and elsewhere are using the abbreviation CSE when referring to these appalling crimes. Child Sexual Exploitation is a more politically correct term than Muslim paedophile gangs.
The British Labour Party has supported the 'progressive' paedophile agenda over the years with leading lights Harriet Harman and Patricia Hewitt defending paedophiles in the past. Harman has also used her immense influence in the Labour government to support paedophiles by fighting to water down child pornography laws.
(Stories here and here)
The Labour Party has a previous history of supporting sexual deviants by using it's favourite homosexual campaigners Peter Tatchell and Greville Janner to advocate sex between adults and children .
That bastion of 'progressivism' and Labour Party mouthpiece, otherwise known as the BBC, is awash with paedophiles as the horrific Jimmy Savile scandal revealed. Some of the BBC's top attractions were rampant child abusers and they carried on with their depravity for decades with the full knowledge of the management. It's been over a year since this scandal broke but nobody from the hierarchy has been prosecuted.
(Savile, Janner and Tatchel stories here, here and here)
It is now accepted that the 'progressive agenda is being implemented in the civilized world therefore it is not confined to Great Britain.
Child sex abuse has been advocated in Germany for many years by that epitome of 'progressivism', the Green Party. They are trying to distance themselves from their advocacy in order to continue their place on the gravy train.
(German paedo stories here and here)
There can be no discussion about the 'progressive' child sex agenda without mentioning the European Union. This place is awash with perverts and paedophiles nothing would please them more than to be able to have sex with children legally. Under the Lisbon Treaty paedophilia must not be disriminated against and is classed as an acceptable sexual orientation.
(Must read story here)
In conclusion it must be noted that although they project themselves as the guardians of children's well being, legalizing sex between adults and children is high on the 'progressive' agenda with their promotional soundbite becomeing more established - "Paedophilia is just another sexual orientation".
(Story here)
Socialists/progressives call for action to reduce child poverty out of one side of their mouths and call for their legalised rape out of the other.
Due its topicality, this is a re-edited post from last year.
Showing posts with label Progressive Agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressive Agenda. Show all posts
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Friday, September 13, 2013
Islamic Jihad And The Treachery Of The Political Establishment
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Nelson Mandela, Mrs Thatcher And The Biased BBC
Like the National Health Service, the British Broadcasting Corporation, universally known as the BBC, is touted by its supporters as another much loved British institution and another envy of the world. This taxpayer funded broadcaster is required by its Charter to be a 'public service' and politically neutral.
The reality couldn't be further from the manufactured truth. The BBC is run by a government appointed Trust and is infested with politically correct 'progressive' activists who's only mission in life is the dissemination of their own propaganda.
The trade unions who dominate the BBC workforce set new lows yesterday when organising their strike against job cuts and so called bullying. (Trade Unionists complaining about bullying? Maybe they should get some advise from Arthur Scargill).
A union spokesperson stated that they would postpone strike action and return to work should the ailing former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, shuffle off his mortal coil and go to meet his maker.
They also stated that the possible death of ailing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, "might not have warranted the same response" or as another union spokesperson is quoted a saying on a possible return to work, "I could not guarantee it".
An unnamed spokesperson demonstrated the BBC mindset perfectly when he/she/it said of the contingency that "we welcome this announcement and it is a tribute to the BBC staff ".
For those reluctant 'subscribers' who are familiar with the BBC, this kind of political bigotry comes as no big surprise but for those who are not so familiar, consider this an education in the manner of how a state broadcaster operates.
The Chairman and the BBC Executive Board, who are supposed to guarantee that BBC is run in the interests of the taxpayer, are appointed by the government not the taxpayers. The BBC comes under the remit of the Orwellian Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport.
(It is a sign of the post democratic age when under a supposedly freedom loving Conservative government and in a time of financial constraint, the British people have to pay for and suffer such a totalitarian institution as a Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport).
The current Chairman is Chris Patton, a serial loser and career political bureaucrat. As the Conservative Member of Parliament for Bath he was such an utter failure that his own constituents booted him out of a safe seat.
As a reward for being a loyal 'progressive' bag carrier and without any qualifications for the job, he was made Governor of Hong Kong where, as Fat Pang, he managed to upset all sides during the handover to the Chinese.
Fat Pang Patton is the epitome of the reward for failure culture that infests British public life. Since Hong Kong, he has been a disastrous European Commissioner and was keeping a low profile as Chancellor of Oxford University when he was mysteriously appointed the Chairman of the BBC Executive Board.
Since he joined the BBC it has staggered from one disaster to another with the Jimmy Savile paedophile sex ring and the huge renumeration packages of its top executives making global headlines.
BBC employees, from the top executives and editors to programmers, presenters, journalists and cameramen, even down to the chief sweeper up and bottle washer, are steeped to the core in 'progresive' politics.
It should come as no surprise that the BBC and its employees have an uncontrollable, visceral hatred for Mrs Thatcher but consider Nelson Mandela to be a divine being on par with Che Guevara and his butcher in chief, Fidel Castro.
It must be pointed out that BBC bias is the issue here and not any philosophical affiliations.
To some, Nelson Mandela is a freedom fighter who suffered torture and imprisonment in pursuit of his cause, to others he is a common terrorist no different to Al Qaeda and who was sentenced to prison as a criminal for his indiscriminate bombing campaign.
To the BBC he is halfway to divinity.
To some, Margaret Thatcher enlightened the people and saved her country from the economic disaster perpetrated by the communist controlled trade unions and Labour party, to others she set the relentless 'progressive' revolution back decades and engineered the fall of communism.
To the BBC she is the devil incarnate.
It is a mystery that the BBC is the standard bearer for equality and women's rights but they have never given Mrs Thatcher any credit for taking on the male dominated political establishment and going on to become Great Britain's first female Prime Minister.
When it comes to the great issues of the day, the BBC can be guaranteed to relentlessly push the 'progressive' agenda.
The following is just a sample:
The BBC is passionate about the Palestinians while hating Jews and Israel.
Despite the relentless increase in government spending and debt, the BBC continues to push the Labour party line on 'savage cuts'.
The BBC is a soapbox for Al Gore and his Man Made Global Warming Scam. They are now so hopelessly biased on this issue that they have unilaterally declared their legal obligation to be balanced as obsolete.
They declare that because Climate Realism is a minority view they are not obliged to give it equal air time. Now that 'combating climate change' fanatics are in a minority the same should apply but I doubt it will.
The same goes for party political bias. The BBC refuse to give UKIP air time comparable with their support but continue to indulge the ultra 'progressive' Liberal Democrats even though support has plummeted.
The BBC are committed Europhiles who support the United States of Europe while demonising anyone who disagrees.
The BBC indulge in sexuality politics and are relentless in pursuit of the LGBT agenda and homosexual marriage.
They despise Christianity but take the politically correct point of view on the issue of Islam.
The BBC are the governments biggest promoters of immigration, celebrating diversity, and the transformation of Great Britain into a multi-cultural state.
The BBC had a hatred for President Bush that was almost as visceral as that of Mrs Thatcher but they adore the new 'Progressive in Chief', Barack Obama.
They had a similar hatred for President Ronald Reagan.
Ignoring the majority of the people, the leaders of the three legacy parties, LibLabCon are all adamant that the BBC is a much loved British institution and should continue to be funded by the taxpayer.
The fact that the BBC is a government run propaganda broadcaster, which is funded under threat of imprisonment, gives an indication of how far down the authoritarian road Great Britain has travelled.
One day, when freedom is restored to Great Britain, the BBC will be confined to the dustbin of history and its employees will be free to leave and go work for a state broadcaster in any dictatorship of their choice.
Update:
Over at dikiebo, The vile BBC obviously can't resist insulting Christians in time for Easter.
The reality couldn't be further from the manufactured truth. The BBC is run by a government appointed Trust and is infested with politically correct 'progressive' activists who's only mission in life is the dissemination of their own propaganda.
The trade unions who dominate the BBC workforce set new lows yesterday when organising their strike against job cuts and so called bullying. (Trade Unionists complaining about bullying? Maybe they should get some advise from Arthur Scargill).
A union spokesperson stated that they would postpone strike action and return to work should the ailing former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, shuffle off his mortal coil and go to meet his maker.
They also stated that the possible death of ailing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, "might not have warranted the same response" or as another union spokesperson is quoted a saying on a possible return to work, "I could not guarantee it".
An unnamed spokesperson demonstrated the BBC mindset perfectly when he/she/it said of the contingency that "we welcome this announcement and it is a tribute to the BBC staff ".
For those reluctant 'subscribers' who are familiar with the BBC, this kind of political bigotry comes as no big surprise but for those who are not so familiar, consider this an education in the manner of how a state broadcaster operates.
The Chairman and the BBC Executive Board, who are supposed to guarantee that BBC is run in the interests of the taxpayer, are appointed by the government not the taxpayers. The BBC comes under the remit of the Orwellian Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport.
(It is a sign of the post democratic age when under a supposedly freedom loving Conservative government and in a time of financial constraint, the British people have to pay for and suffer such a totalitarian institution as a Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport).
The current Chairman is Chris Patton, a serial loser and career political bureaucrat. As the Conservative Member of Parliament for Bath he was such an utter failure that his own constituents booted him out of a safe seat.
As a reward for being a loyal 'progressive' bag carrier and without any qualifications for the job, he was made Governor of Hong Kong where, as Fat Pang, he managed to upset all sides during the handover to the Chinese.
Fat Pang Patton is the epitome of the reward for failure culture that infests British public life. Since Hong Kong, he has been a disastrous European Commissioner and was keeping a low profile as Chancellor of Oxford University when he was mysteriously appointed the Chairman of the BBC Executive Board.
Since he joined the BBC it has staggered from one disaster to another with the Jimmy Savile paedophile sex ring and the huge renumeration packages of its top executives making global headlines.
BBC employees, from the top executives and editors to programmers, presenters, journalists and cameramen, even down to the chief sweeper up and bottle washer, are steeped to the core in 'progresive' politics.
It should come as no surprise that the BBC and its employees have an uncontrollable, visceral hatred for Mrs Thatcher but consider Nelson Mandela to be a divine being on par with Che Guevara and his butcher in chief, Fidel Castro.
It must be pointed out that BBC bias is the issue here and not any philosophical affiliations.
To some, Nelson Mandela is a freedom fighter who suffered torture and imprisonment in pursuit of his cause, to others he is a common terrorist no different to Al Qaeda and who was sentenced to prison as a criminal for his indiscriminate bombing campaign.
To the BBC he is halfway to divinity.
To some, Margaret Thatcher enlightened the people and saved her country from the economic disaster perpetrated by the communist controlled trade unions and Labour party, to others she set the relentless 'progressive' revolution back decades and engineered the fall of communism.
To the BBC she is the devil incarnate.
It is a mystery that the BBC is the standard bearer for equality and women's rights but they have never given Mrs Thatcher any credit for taking on the male dominated political establishment and going on to become Great Britain's first female Prime Minister.
When it comes to the great issues of the day, the BBC can be guaranteed to relentlessly push the 'progressive' agenda.
The following is just a sample:
The BBC is passionate about the Palestinians while hating Jews and Israel.
Despite the relentless increase in government spending and debt, the BBC continues to push the Labour party line on 'savage cuts'.
The BBC is a soapbox for Al Gore and his Man Made Global Warming Scam. They are now so hopelessly biased on this issue that they have unilaterally declared their legal obligation to be balanced as obsolete.
They declare that because Climate Realism is a minority view they are not obliged to give it equal air time. Now that 'combating climate change' fanatics are in a minority the same should apply but I doubt it will.
The same goes for party political bias. The BBC refuse to give UKIP air time comparable with their support but continue to indulge the ultra 'progressive' Liberal Democrats even though support has plummeted.
The BBC are committed Europhiles who support the United States of Europe while demonising anyone who disagrees.
The BBC indulge in sexuality politics and are relentless in pursuit of the LGBT agenda and homosexual marriage.
They despise Christianity but take the politically correct point of view on the issue of Islam.
The BBC are the governments biggest promoters of immigration, celebrating diversity, and the transformation of Great Britain into a multi-cultural state.
The BBC had a hatred for President Bush that was almost as visceral as that of Mrs Thatcher but they adore the new 'Progressive in Chief', Barack Obama.
They had a similar hatred for President Ronald Reagan.
Ignoring the majority of the people, the leaders of the three legacy parties, LibLabCon are all adamant that the BBC is a much loved British institution and should continue to be funded by the taxpayer.
The fact that the BBC is a government run propaganda broadcaster, which is funded under threat of imprisonment, gives an indication of how far down the authoritarian road Great Britain has travelled.
One day, when freedom is restored to Great Britain, the BBC will be confined to the dustbin of history and its employees will be free to leave and go work for a state broadcaster in any dictatorship of their choice.
Update:
Over at dikiebo, The vile BBC obviously can't resist insulting Christians in time for Easter.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Politicians Legalise Theft In Cyprus - Progressive Agenda Rolls On
Many people expressed their scepticism when I put forward the view last week, that the impending bank heist in Cyprus was a planned power and wealth grab by EU and global 'progressive' politicians. In light of recent events I suggest they look at the evidence, with their blinkers removed, and rethink their scepticism.
As any member of the hard left will confirm, this is how 'progressives' operate. The current bank heist on the island of Cyprus was a classic power grab operation from the start. The same tactics have been used in other countries and its really not that difficult to understand.
In this case the object of the operation was not rescuing the Cypriot banks or their sabotaged economy nor was it anything to do with the helping the Cypriot people in their hour of need.
The real object of this 'rescue' was breaking the taboo that private property is sacrosanct and with the added bonus of removing the right of the people to choose their own destiny via the ballot box.
The way the EU authoritarians, led by Germany's Angela Merkel, went about this operation deserves credit. It was brilliant in it's conception and carried out to perfection, with all their objectives achieved.
The people of Cyprus now join Ireland, Greece and Italy as a country where democracy has been suspended and where the government is run directly by the European Union. As with Ireland, Italy and Greece their national parliaments are powerless therefore the people are disenfranchised.
They will suffer years, possibly decades, of EU enforced poverty and despair, with no recourse to a democratically elected government for any alternative policy.
Ironically, the German people will get a vote on the bank theft and the forced austerity plan but the Cypriot people will not. The rest of the EU need to take note that this how a power grabs work and these are the consequences.
In exchange for some EU bribe money, the government of Cyprus has confiscated private wealth from the people, together with that of foreign investors, and effectively handed it over to the EU.
Before the bank heist was carried out the people were softened up with a bit of PR demonising spin. The line was pushed that there's plenty of money in the banks but it belongs to bad people, such as Russian oligarchs, the Russian mob and the 'rich', so it really wouldn't be so bad to seize it on behalf of the people. Who could possibly object?
The politicians responsible for this spin offered no proof of who held money in these banks but what is certain is that not all the depositors were oligarchs, mobsters or the 'rich' people. The bank seizure applied to pension funds and honest people's money too, these people had deposited legitimately earned money and life savings into the banks in good faith.
The Cypriot people should take comfort from the fact that the government sympathises with their plight. Their Dear Leader, President Nicos Anastasiades, is quoted as saying that he "understands your anger" and he called for "all Cypriots to work together".
This is a variation on the tired old slogan which is trotted out by politicians the world over whenever they are about to shaft the people, "we're all in it together".
As is normal in these situations, the guilty people who organised this crime, namely the political class and their cronies, the banksters and the well connected party donors, will get away unpunished with their ill gotten gains intact. There will be no justice for the people of Cyprus.
Now that the idea of 'private property is the government's property' has been entered into the public psyche, what can we expect from the political class in the future as they move their 'progressive' agenda of global equality and fairness forward?
It would be a mistake to think that this is a single instance or that it is confined to the Eurozone. Dutch Finance Minister, Jerven Dijisselobloem, in his moment of triumph, let it slip that this "represented the new template for dealing with a bank crisis". Ooops!
He was quickly reprimanded by his bosses Angela Merkel and Christine Legarde of the IMF and was forced to back peddle somewhat by claiming that it was a single instance. Too late Jerven, the cat is out of the bag!
Christine Legarde, who as Finance Minister was herself the architect of the French economic disaster, claimed that this bank theft was "a comprehensive and creditable plan".
Coming from the head of the IMF gives this bank theft international legitimacy so it will be considered as a green light for any government to seize private property. It should not stretch the imagination of anyone to see that unscrupulous 'progressive' governments the world over will be seizing private assets, safe in the knowledge that there will be no protest from the international institutions.
Spain, Portugal and the other indebted EU countries are next, followed by indebted countries around the world. This is an opportunity that the 'progressives' will not be able to pass up.
Our American cousins should take note that according to sources inside the government, their Progressive in Chief, Barack Obama, is planning a heist of his own.
As the saying goes 'even Stevie Wonder can see this one coming'. By refusing to deal with government deficit spending he is deliberately driving up an unsustainable debt. When the next downgrade comes he will raid their personal savings accounts in addition to their 401K pension funds in response.
He intends to do this by taking the cash and replacing it with a worthless government IOU. The American people who did the right thing will be stripped of their wealth and will be rendered as poor as their compatriots who didn't bother to save for the future. Equality and fairness for the masses in one stroke. Job done, mission accomplished.
The people of Europe should extend a hand to our American cousins and welcome them to the world of socialism. 'Come on in the waters lovely'.
If proof were needed that this is the start of a global heist, it will be noted that no government leader has expressed any outrage at this blatant theft, therefore we must assume it meets with their approval.
It is devastating for those British people who believe in liberty, free enterprise and prosperity that the leader of the Conservative party, the traditional guardian of these sacred values, has given his approval to this theft. There is no hope for the freedom loving people of Great Britain while the 'progressive' usurper David Cameron remains in control.
The great man himself has summed up this awful political low life that is destroying the British nation:
"That David Cameron is welcoming these plans shows how far the British political class is from any ideals of democracy, accountability and liberty. Instead the future to him is a technocratic, post democratic world, run in the most part by unelected, fanatical and deluded power-mongers in Brussels and Frankfurt". - Nigel Farage
As any member of the hard left will confirm, this is how 'progressives' operate. The current bank heist on the island of Cyprus was a classic power grab operation from the start. The same tactics have been used in other countries and its really not that difficult to understand.
In this case the object of the operation was not rescuing the Cypriot banks or their sabotaged economy nor was it anything to do with the helping the Cypriot people in their hour of need.
The real object of this 'rescue' was breaking the taboo that private property is sacrosanct and with the added bonus of removing the right of the people to choose their own destiny via the ballot box.
The way the EU authoritarians, led by Germany's Angela Merkel, went about this operation deserves credit. It was brilliant in it's conception and carried out to perfection, with all their objectives achieved.
The people of Cyprus now join Ireland, Greece and Italy as a country where democracy has been suspended and where the government is run directly by the European Union. As with Ireland, Italy and Greece their national parliaments are powerless therefore the people are disenfranchised.
They will suffer years, possibly decades, of EU enforced poverty and despair, with no recourse to a democratically elected government for any alternative policy.
Ironically, the German people will get a vote on the bank theft and the forced austerity plan but the Cypriot people will not. The rest of the EU need to take note that this how a power grabs work and these are the consequences.
In exchange for some EU bribe money, the government of Cyprus has confiscated private wealth from the people, together with that of foreign investors, and effectively handed it over to the EU.
Before the bank heist was carried out the people were softened up with a bit of PR demonising spin. The line was pushed that there's plenty of money in the banks but it belongs to bad people, such as Russian oligarchs, the Russian mob and the 'rich', so it really wouldn't be so bad to seize it on behalf of the people. Who could possibly object?
The politicians responsible for this spin offered no proof of who held money in these banks but what is certain is that not all the depositors were oligarchs, mobsters or the 'rich' people. The bank seizure applied to pension funds and honest people's money too, these people had deposited legitimately earned money and life savings into the banks in good faith.
The Cypriot people should take comfort from the fact that the government sympathises with their plight. Their Dear Leader, President Nicos Anastasiades, is quoted as saying that he "understands your anger" and he called for "all Cypriots to work together".
This is a variation on the tired old slogan which is trotted out by politicians the world over whenever they are about to shaft the people, "we're all in it together".
As is normal in these situations, the guilty people who organised this crime, namely the political class and their cronies, the banksters and the well connected party donors, will get away unpunished with their ill gotten gains intact. There will be no justice for the people of Cyprus.
Now that the idea of 'private property is the government's property' has been entered into the public psyche, what can we expect from the political class in the future as they move their 'progressive' agenda of global equality and fairness forward?
It would be a mistake to think that this is a single instance or that it is confined to the Eurozone. Dutch Finance Minister, Jerven Dijisselobloem, in his moment of triumph, let it slip that this "represented the new template for dealing with a bank crisis". Ooops!
He was quickly reprimanded by his bosses Angela Merkel and Christine Legarde of the IMF and was forced to back peddle somewhat by claiming that it was a single instance. Too late Jerven, the cat is out of the bag!
Christine Legarde, who as Finance Minister was herself the architect of the French economic disaster, claimed that this bank theft was "a comprehensive and creditable plan".
Coming from the head of the IMF gives this bank theft international legitimacy so it will be considered as a green light for any government to seize private property. It should not stretch the imagination of anyone to see that unscrupulous 'progressive' governments the world over will be seizing private assets, safe in the knowledge that there will be no protest from the international institutions.
Spain, Portugal and the other indebted EU countries are next, followed by indebted countries around the world. This is an opportunity that the 'progressives' will not be able to pass up.
Our American cousins should take note that according to sources inside the government, their Progressive in Chief, Barack Obama, is planning a heist of his own.
As the saying goes 'even Stevie Wonder can see this one coming'. By refusing to deal with government deficit spending he is deliberately driving up an unsustainable debt. When the next downgrade comes he will raid their personal savings accounts in addition to their 401K pension funds in response.
He intends to do this by taking the cash and replacing it with a worthless government IOU. The American people who did the right thing will be stripped of their wealth and will be rendered as poor as their compatriots who didn't bother to save for the future. Equality and fairness for the masses in one stroke. Job done, mission accomplished.
The people of Europe should extend a hand to our American cousins and welcome them to the world of socialism. 'Come on in the waters lovely'.
If proof were needed that this is the start of a global heist, it will be noted that no government leader has expressed any outrage at this blatant theft, therefore we must assume it meets with their approval.
It is devastating for those British people who believe in liberty, free enterprise and prosperity that the leader of the Conservative party, the traditional guardian of these sacred values, has given his approval to this theft. There is no hope for the freedom loving people of Great Britain while the 'progressive' usurper David Cameron remains in control.
The great man himself has summed up this awful political low life that is destroying the British nation:
"That David Cameron is welcoming these plans shows how far the British political class is from any ideals of democracy, accountability and liberty. Instead the future to him is a technocratic, post democratic world, run in the most part by unelected, fanatical and deluded power-mongers in Brussels and Frankfurt". - Nigel Farage
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)