FDR And Truman Worked With Stalin To Destroy A Common Enemy

If people thought the BBC-led mainstream media in Great Britain was biased then they need to take a look at its American counterpart. The Ministry of Disinformation and Propaganda would be a perfect title that would sum up the organizations that not only peddle lies and falsehoods for political ends but also ignores the history of their own country.

The attempts to portray Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, as a danger to peace for suggesting an alliance with Russian President, Vladimir Putin, to defeat ISIS is not only puerile but it's insulting the intelligence of informed people across the planet who read this nonsense.

There's nothing new about an American President working with a Russian strongman to defeat a common enemy. Presidents Roosevelt and Truman both worked in an alliance with the communist tyrant Josef Stalin to defeat Nazi Germany.

Before falling for the campaign to smear and ridicule Donald Trump it would be wise to note that President Putin is a venerable saint compared to Stalin who was one of history's biggest mass murderers and who also went on to enslave huge swathes of Europe under his brutal communist yoke for two generations.

It must also be borne in mind that Germany posed no direct territorial threat to the United States unlike ISIS who are using their Islamic State in Iraq and Syria to train, finance and radicalize Muslims to attack and kill Americans on their home soil.

As the mainstream media are using a possible Trump-Putin alliance to ridicule and smear his candidacy, it would be interesting to know if his opponent, Hillary Clinton, considers Presidents Roosevelt and Truman's alliance with Stalin to defeat Nazi Germany were dangers to peace and to American interests abroad during World War II.

While we are on the subject of great historical events it would also be interesting to know if she agrees with President Truman's decision to use atomic weapons to defeat the Japanese, but I digress.

What is obvious is that American foreign policy under President Obama has been an unmitigated disaster which has left the middle east in ruins and facilitated the rise of ISIS which in turn has caused the spread of radical Islam to all corners of the planet.

The choice the American electorate face is one of the status quo which will allow ISIS and radical Islam to entrench itself in the middle east and Africa and continue to spread to the American mainland itself or Mr. Trump's alternative.

In conclusion a word of caution: If Mr. Trump does win and joins with President Putin to defeat ISIS he should take note that although the 4th century BC proverb, " the enemy of my enemy is my friend" still holds true today as it has for over two thousand years, it was tempered by Great Britain's wartime Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, when he added that when supping with the devil be sure to use a long spoon.

Catch A Falling Star - Obama Is Being Bitch Slapped From Iran To Kenya

It seems like only yesterday that candidate Barack Obama was being anointed as the new Messiah, a new era of politician who was going to 'fundamentally transform' the most powerful and prosperous nation on earth........into what he didn't say.

In a promise worthy of the Saviour Himself this photogenic so-called African-American, flanked by fake Greek columns, was going to 'stop the oceans from rising and heal the planet'.

So powerful was the Obama media created brand that world leaders would embarrass themselves with an undignified scrum whenever the chance for a photo opportunity came their way.

Great Britain's former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, was so desperate for a photo-op that he disgraced himself, his office and the British people by chasing Obama through a hotel kitchen having been turned down for a meeting five times.

(Cynics argue that Obama was right to avoid Brown as the latter's reputation for imbecility went before him like a storm front. A photo-opportunity with Brown at this particular moment in time was to be avoided at all costs to prevent him tarnishing Obama's expensively created image)

The ultimate accolade came when after only nine months in office, a now sanctified President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace prize for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people"; this was despite the fact that he was engaged in two wars at the time.

Many people had warned during his initial campaign for the Presidency that Barack Obama was a dangerous creation of the global 'progressive' elite who were determined, in the name of equality of nations and of people, to downgrade the United States of America, erase its Judeo-Christian heritage and consign American exceptionalism to the dustbin of history.

Some six years later every American patriots' worst nightmare has come true; the United States has indeed suffered a severe downgrade both socially and economically and its reputation abroad is tainted almost beyond repair.

During his tenure as Commander-in-Chief, the once mighty military machine has been so socially engineered by sexuality and gender obsessed politicians it is no longer feared or respected. Among some of America's more religiously motivated enemies, the move to allow gay, lesbian and transgendered people to serve openly is the last straw that has reduced the military to nothing more than a laughing stock.

A heavy dose of reality does have a sobering effect on the mind in addition to removing the rose tinted spectacles from those that put them on because they deliberately did not wish to see the truth.

Looking back some six years it would have been inconceivable that this man who was halfway to Divinity is now being bitch slapped everywhere from Iran to Kenya; not just by the big beasts of Iran and Russia but by every tin pot dictator from Assad in Syria, to Uhuru Kenyatta in his supposed spiritual home of Kenya.

In six short years the slobbering sycophants who were hoping for some of Obama's starlight to rub off on them have replaced their undignified scramble for a photo op with a polite 'say cheese and lets get the hell outta here' attitude.

During the recent mid-term elections, even his own Democratic party members made their excuses and hid in the trees rather than have their reputations tarnished by a photo op with their own President.

This disregard for Barack Obama, along with the associated disrespect for the office he holds, has made the world a more dangerous place.

The tyrants in Beijing are expanding their influence in the South China Sea and attacking America's cyberspace interests with impunity.

President Putin has humiliated President Obama on the world stage by ignoring his threats and expanding, without fear of retribution, his Russian Empire into Crimea and Ukraine. He is currently working on returning the Baltic States into the Russian sphere of influence and who would bet against him succeeding.

President Assad of Syria crossed Obama's so called 'red line' over the use of chemical weapons without fear of the threatened retribution. This has emboldened every other dictator and terrorist in the region and beyond to also pursue their goals without fear.

Embarrassingly for the American people, their President still believes in his own Divinity and that the whole world still hangs on every word he utters.

President Kenyatta rightly bitch slapped him when he proceeded to lecture him on gay rights in Kenya; this episode also serves as a clear indication that although he touts himself as an African-American, with Kenyan ancestry, he doesn't have the faintest idea about African attitudes to homosexuality.

Likewise when he lectured the British people about their remaining in the hated EU; he was told in no uncertain terms to mind his own business by a series of prominent politicians, including the leaders of the ever growing United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip), which is campaigning to leave.

If, as British Prime Minister Harold Wilson is once quoted as saying, 'a week is a long time in politics' then six years is a lifetime and it shows in the demeanor and delusions of the once infallible, Messianic President of the United States.

In conclusion, like President Jimmy Carter before him, no matter what he thinks his legacy will be, it won't turn out that way. With the Ayatollahs openly humiliating him over their victory in the nuclear talks, they join Russia, China, ISIS and every other Obama emboldened enemy laughing as they belittle the person that was, until recently, the most powerful man on the planet.

British ISIS Terrorists - David Cameron Not So Tough After All

It didn't take long for David Cameron's tough action plan to combat Great Britain's home grown ISIS jihadis to be unmasked for the worthless PR exercise that it was. The anti-Obama media outlets in the USA, including Fox News, would have done better to talk to the long suffering British people before they started touting Cameron as the proactive, tough talking pragmatist that they wanted their President to emulate.

The British people have heard it all before as his latest shameless attempt to convince the electorate, and the wider world at large, that he is a fearless, no nonsense statesman who will not hesitate to take the tough decisions necessary to combat the ruthless ISIS terrorists that are the creation of his own policies.

The world's media outlets and their political pundits understood from Cameron's spin doctor produced speeches that he was going to remove the passports from the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of British Muslims who have joined the jihad in places such as Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Chechnya and elsewhere.

They also understood that he was going to fulfill his long held ambition to have his own war by bombing Syria and arming the rebels - however he failed to make it clear which rebel faction he was going to arm. And what better way is there to create a new Johnny Rambo type action man image than confronting the macho man himself, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Cameron has threatened to put three and half thousand troops on the Ukrainian border to discourage Putin's army from supporting the Ukrainian separatists. Putin must be quaking in his kerenky.

It doesn't take long for the discerning observer to take apart this latest choreographed Cameron performance especially if his pedigree and modus operandi are taken into account.

David Cameron adheres to the new system of politics that was pioneered by his mentor, Tony Blair. His PR machine uses focus groups and pollsters to work out the issues that are of most concern to the different demographic groups, they then manufacture his speeches and choreograph his public performances to appeal to the majority in each group, while at the same time keeping his real agenda under wraps.

Knowing full well that the majority of the British people despise the EU, he stated that he would be the most Eurosceptic Prime Minister in history. After attaining office he stated that he "firmly believes Britain's place is inside European Union". He was then, and remains, a committed supporter of 'ever closer union' and the eventual integration of Great Britain into the United States of Europe.

 His 'cast iron guarantee' that the British people will get a referendum on EU membership will go down as one of the biggest whoppers in political history.

Cameron continues to promise a re-negotiation of membership terms despite the fact that his bosses in Brussels, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have said no re-negotiation is possible. He is promising a referendum on membership but not before 2017 and only if he is re-elected as Prime Minister.

As a flavor of Cameron's propensity for making false promises for electoral gain, in 2007, prior to his election, he promised a series of measures to deal with violent crime. This included tearing up the twenty four hour drinking laws, minimum sentencing, using prison ships, building more prisons, supporting marriage through the tax and benefits system. etc. His government promised to cut taxes, including inheritance tax, deal with the deficit and cut the debt. It's now 2014 and none of these promises have been delivered.
(See some of Cameron's fibs here)

The biggest issues by far for the British people are open border mass immigration together with imposed multi-culturalism and Islamification. It is in this arena that David Cameron comes into his own as a consummate PR man and congenital liar. It is these dubious skills that caused the world's media to mistakenly portray him as a tough, uncompromising, decision taking statesman when confronted by British born ISIS fanatics and radical Islam.

Cameron's knowingly false promise to cut net immigration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands put paid once and for all the myth that he has even an iota of credibility. Immigration has gone inexorably up year on year despite the fact that it is within his power to fulfill this promise.

With his reputation as a mere PR man firmly established, his latest tough guy performance can now be looked at in a truer light and his pronouncements dissected to reveal their real purpose, which is image making and spinning for electoral purposes.

Cameron loudly intimated he will remove passports from British ISIS jihadis and strip them of their citizenship only to back off a week later after he thought his tough guy reputation was secured.
(Cameron seizing passports here, Cameron not seizing passports here.

At the recent NATO summit, statesman Cameron noisily stated that he doesn't need President Bashir al Assad's permission to bomb Syria as he doesn't recognize him as the countries legitimate leader. He also claimed that Assad is part of the problem. One week later his Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond has ruled out any bombing of Syria.
(Cameron bombing Syria here, Cameron not bombing Syria here)

He carries on making knowingly false promises in the forlorn hope that the British people will take him seriously when their experience of his past pronunciations  and the consequences of his lying are there for all to see:

He promised to clamp down on Muslim preachers of hate - false

He promised to teach British values in schools - false

He promised to prevent access by immigrants to the people's taxpayer funded welfare system - false

He promised to end health tourism by denying access by immigrants to the peoples NHS - false

He promised to stop further integration to the European Union - false

And so it goes on and on, he seems to be incapable of being straight with the British people even when they know what his real agenda is.

David Cameron is a self admitted Europhile who is totally dedicated to the integration of Great Britain into a post democratic United States of Europe. He is therefore committed to replacing the traditional way of life with a 'multi-cultural society' and using rigidly policed political correctness to achieve this goal.

He is completely out of step with the majority of the British people and this is demonstrated by the flight of his traditional supporters to the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and with this comes the prospect of political oblivion for him and his treacherous fellow travelers.

Ukraine, Gaza, Syria - Blessed Are The Peacemakers But Where Are They?

To the casual observer of the news bulletins it would appear that the world is going to hell in something bigger and faster than a handcart. Even the major conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza and Syria are being supplemented by other not so public bloodfests in Iraq, Nigeria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq and so on and so forth. And, as always, it's civilians that pay the biggest price for the follies and intransigence of the perpetrators.

Despite the claim of being civilised, the modern age is no different to ages past and is just as jam packed with war mongers, imperialists, ambitious empire builders and covetous expansionists that caused mayhem and bloodshed throughout history.

One difference between today and those bygone ages is the prevalence of high profile people who masquerade around the world claiming to be peacemakers or lovers of peace. One would think that with the resources of the United Nations and its agencies, together with the combined efforts of all these peacemakers, there would not be any wars at all.

Looking at the facts it becomes immediately apparent that the United Nations is not only a hopeless hotbed of corruption, it is also of no use whatsoever in solving conflict or preventing war between nations.  It couldn't  prevent the soccer war fought between El Salvador and Honduras in 1969 over a World Cup qualifying match.

The Lords Resistance Army insurgency has been causing horrific bloodshed in Uganda since 1987 and they couldn't even influence their biggest benefactor, and the worlds largest superpower, not to invade the tiny island of Grenada in 1983.

One shouldn't be surprised that a bloated ever expanding bureaucracy, stuffed with career diplomats, superannuated politicians with designs on becoming a world government, could be anything other than a very expensive talking shop. As it currently stands the UN's only purpose, other than making innumerable resolutions against Israel, is promoting global socialism and insulting the United States.
(See wars since 1945 here)

Accepting that the UN will not stop the carnage, it is worth looking at the current conflicts together with those that strut the world stage as peacemakers, to make sure that they are working for peace and actually deserve the accolades they get.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict can be laid firmly at the door of the European Union and its expansionists ambitions combined with the pathetically weak leadership and lack of resolve of the USA, Great Britain and the western powers.

Even the casual observer would know that President Putin is a Russian patriot seeking to return Mother Russia to her former glory. They would also know that he is a ruthless former leader of the KGB who knows his way around the geopolitical chessboard. Ukraine was part of the former empire situated on its Black Sea border. Any attempt to bring Ukraine into the EU and NATO was too close for comfort for Putin and was resisted, just as the USA resisted the Russian military presence in Cuba.

When the European Union started its expansionist policy in Ukraine what did they expect Putin to do? They stirred up a hornets nest and a civil war was the result. One would think that the EU's pompously named High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Baroness Ashton of Upholland, also considered to be one of the highest paid politicians on the planet, would be smarter than she actually is. The truth is that despite her title and remuneration package she is considered to be a complete waste of money and space.
(Ashton disaster story here)

It is worth noting that despite its incompetence and expansionist warmongering the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2012.

It would not be unreasonable to expect that those who have received the Nobel Peace Prize, and who accept the accolades and status that go with it, would lend themselves to be deployed into these volatile areas for the purposes of bringing peace.

As ISIS beheads and murders its way across Syria and Iraq and Hamas pours missiles indiscriminately into civilian areas of Israel, one is entitled to ask where is 2011 Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman? It looks like a perfect opportunity for a peacemaker to put her reputation to the test. She is of course a senior member of Yemen's Al-Islah political party, which is akin to the Muslim Brotherhood and which seeks to impose sharia law throughout the Muslim world and beyond. It is safe to say that peace is the last thing on her mind when it comes to Israel.

The 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner is too busy involved fundamentally transforming his homeland from the beacon of freedom and liberty into a third world socialist state to be bothered searching for peace in the worlds hotspots. He is also busy downgrading and eviscerating America's mighty military machine to the point where respect for it is being lost by its enemies.

The 2008 winner, former Finnish Prime Minister, Martii Ahtisaari, is anonymous so any peace making initiatives are not apparent. However, if he is working behind the scenes along with joint 2011 winners Leymah Gbowee and Ellen Sirleaf, good for them and they will deserve the world's thanks should they succeed.

The 2007 Peace Prize winner was the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). One can only imagine what the result would be if the mission of this nonsensical Panel was changed from imposing global socialism under the cover of environmentalism to actual peace making. It beggars belief that this gaggle of agenda driven bureaucrats can be considered as peacemakers.

Joint winner in 2007 with the IPPC was former Vice President and first carbon billionaire Al Gore. Even my fertile imagination is lost for words when trying to consider big Al as a peacemaker.

I could go on but my lack of knowledge about the previous winners would not be constructive to the debate but I hope that if they are still with us they are working for peace and earning their reputations as peacemakers.

I cannot however bypass the 2002 winner Jimmy Carter and the 2001 joint winners, Kofi Annan and the United Nations.

Carter has a reputation for doing good works such as eradicating Guinea worm infestations in West Africa but insulting Israel by referring to it as an apartheid state and making no comment about Muslim atrocities by Palestinian terrorists doesn't exactly signal impartiality. This renders him utterly useless as a peacemaker.

As mentioned previously the UN is nothing more than an expensive, corrupt bureaucracy which is obsessed with Israel, the USA and a global socialist government. Kofi Annan was its leader during a particularly bloody period and proved to be as ineffective as the organisation he ran.

If anyone can bring peace one would think it would be the Middle East Peace Envoy for the Quartet, after all this man represents four of the biggest players on the war and peace scene including some of the participants in the current Ukrainian disaster, the EU and Russia. Also in the Quartet are the UN and the USA.

Again one is entitled to expect that the combined might of these four entities led by a peacemaker of the calibre of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, would put an end to war wherever it flares up.

If anyone is curious as to why, considering his record as Prime Minister and after, Tony Blair was chosen to be a peace envoy then they would not be alone. They would be joined by the entire British nation who were fooled by the spin, deceit and lies of this awful man and who many believe to be an indictable war criminal.

While Blair has supposedly been working to bring peace to the middle east he has also been accumulating a personal fortune using contacts he made while in office and with some of the worlds most questionable characters. The peace envoys fortune is reputed to be anywhere between twenty and eighty million pounds. That's around thirty two or one hundred and twenty eight million US dollars. This includes a property portfolio of around eight properties including the former country estate of Sir John Gielgud and properties in London's exclusive Connaught Square.
(Blair story here)

Not bad for a former leader of the working mans party who once wrote to the then Labour Party leader, Michael Foot, that he "came to socialism via Marxism".

Blair would go down in history as just another socialist hypocrite if he was at least making some progress as a peace envoy but if the Palestinian leaders are anything to go by he is a disaster. In 2012, after almost a decade as peace envoy, they described him as:  "useless useless useless". This is probably the first time that the majority of the British people will agree with the Palestinian leadership.

In conclusion it must be noted that despite a plethora of internationally recognised peacemakers, wars continue and civilians are still being killed in their tens of thousands. Some peacemakers may be genuine and deserve the accolades and their reputations and some are just charlatans.

In one conflict there appears to be a light at the end of the tunnel and there is talk of Tony Blair being relieved of his post. If the speculation is true then that small spark of light will be extinguished by his reported replacement - none other than the superannuated High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Baroness Ashton of Upholland.
(Argh! Blair's replacement story here. Read this and weep)

Prince Charles And Anti-Capitalism - The Romanov's Died In Vain

No one can be sure if by stirring up controversy, Prince Charles is trying to raise his profile above that of his mother and his two sons or if he really does believe the nonsense that he spouts is true. It is without doubt that his mother, Her Majesty the Queen, remains as popular as ever judging by the public reaction during her birthday and Jubilee celebrations.

Likewise the marriage of Prince William to Catherine Middleton, now the Duchess of Cambridge and the birth of their son George, has thrust them into the limelight and won over a new army of admirers both at home and abroad.

Prince Harry appears to be popular because he has a natural ability to connect with people across the generations. This has been put down variously to his front line military service, his laddish behavior and a natural charm which many Royal watchers believe he inherited from mother.

Love her or loath her, Princess Dianna was unarguably the most recognizable and famous woman in the world, who was universally popular and admired for what people saw as her compassion and love of children.

This phenomenon, coupled with his staid choices in everything from his double breasted suits to his new wife, left Prince Charles in danger of slipping into obscurity with the calls for skipping a generation in the line of succession getting ever louder.

He had to do something to keep himself in the public eye but courting controversy in the way that he did displayed a lack of awareness and media savvy that left him open to ridicule as opposed to endearing himself with the people.

It appears that the public at large, unfairly perhaps, have never forgiven him for his treatment of Lady Diana but Prince Charles has only himself to blame for his reputation for wackiness. This is due to his religious attachment to hippy style environmentalism, organic farming and his doomsday warnings about the climate change apocalypse if we don't mend our ways while excluding himself from the sacrifices.

If he is chasing positive publicity with the intention of convincing the public of his fitness to be King then he needs to sack his advisers and replace them with a team which are more in touch with the people and their attitudes to the issues of the day.

Ignoring the fact that Russia lost twenty million people fighting the Nazis during Word War II, his recent public utterance comparing President Putin to Adolf Hitler came across as amateur, ill informed, petulant and crass.

President Putin is a vastly experienced if malign, political operator who is attempting to return mother Russia to her former glory. His geopolitical strategy is paying dividends because of the weakness of the western political leaders.

The ex-KGB chief and master political operator is pitted against two inexperienced media creations in Obama and Cameron together with a Royal Prince who's main interests in life are perceived to be tree hugging, organic vegetables and 'combating climate change'.

Bearing in mind his great uncle Edward's relationship with the German tyrant, comparing President Putin to Adolf Hitler, Prince Charles left himself wide open to a counter attack and subsequent public ridicule by allowing President Putin a free punch to his metaphorical chin.

On global television, Putin reminded the world that Edward the VIII and his consort, Wallis Simpson, were not only friends and regular visitors to Hitler and his henchmen but also mildly sympathetic to the Nazi cause.

If the Putin/Hitler controversy didn't leave Prince Charles open to ridicule then his pronouncements about capitalism certainly did. It is plainly obvious that his religious attachment to environmentalism and 'combating climate change' has not only robbed him of his ability to analyse information and the ability to form logical conclusion but it has also clouded any common sense he may have had. (See article here)

How does he imagine the informed people of the world will react to his assertion that if capitalism fails to reform itself the world will come to a cataclysmic fiery end with poverty, hunger and civil strife?

What Prince Charles is effectively saying is that living standards, especially in the west, must be slashed in order to reduce energy use and therefore every individuals carbon footprint - excluding his own that is.

Like all the other high profile climate change disciples they don't include themselves when proposing a cut  in living standards or carbon emissions.

The climate change Messiah himself, and first carbon billionaire, Al Gore, rarely travels on commercial flights, preferring a private jet. He never uses public transport or rides in a Prius, preferring a limousine. One small house or yurt is not enough, only mansions with carbon footprints the size of a small village.

It is rumoured that Al Gore is building himself another mansion in a part of California that will soon be under water according to his own predictions.

Another climate change disciple is Richard Branson, who's airline is responsible for dumping millions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year. If he is serious about convincing people to reduce their carbon footprint then I suggest he is in the wrong business.

And so it goes, on and on, the loudest voices advocating the end of capitalism and prosperity are those who have benefited most from the system itself.

Bill Gates, Michael Moore, Ted Turner, Richard Branson and the Hollywood glitterati to name but a few.

The British people already have to suffer multi-millionaire socialists railing against the capitalist system from their taxpayer funded ivory towers from whence they occasionally descend to lecture them about income inequality and the need to cut their living standards to save the planet.

They have to endure enough lectures on income inequality from socialist millionaires such as Ed Miliband, Peter Mandelson and Tony Blair without Prince Charles joining in the fray.

He should be aware from his exclusive education that there is no reforming capitalism, there is no Blair/Clinton third way, there are only two choices and those are capitalism or socialism/communism

History has shown us over again that socialism is a totalitarian philosophy and no matter what resources are available it always ends in poverty, enslavement and bloodshed.

What Prince Charles and the anti-capitalists are saying is that the planet is doomed unless the west rations energy to match the carbon footprints of North Korea as opposed to those South Korea. (See here)

History has also shown us that socialism is always imposed by violent revolution which is accompanied by a massacre of the principle players from the previous regime together with anyone who is considered to be a counter revolutionary.

Socialists hold a particular animosity toward Monarchies as his Romanov relatives could testify if their ancestors, man, woman and children, plus Jemmy the family dog, hadn't been shot to death by the incoming anti-capitalists.

If Prince Charles really believes that anti-capitalists will leave him alone in his many palaces to pursue his tree hugging environmentalism while urging everyone else to live in yurts then the Romanov's really did die in vain.

See the Royal Palaces.

See a low carbon footprint yurt.

See Tony Blair's country pile. 

See Lord Mandelson's humble abode.


  

Putin Takes Control - American Global Influence Evaporates

On this day when the American people remember the tragic loss of their fellow citizens in the World Trade Centre atrocity, it is worth reminding ourselves that this is also the anniversary of the Benghazi atrocity where sections of the Muslim world celebrated their victory over the Great Satan on the 11th September 2001. These two atrocities came about as a result of the erosion of American power and influence over several decades and particularly during the last six years.

Those of us who support the informed American people in their fight to prevent a European type descent into third world mediocrity, the performance of their President and his acolytes in recent weeks will be depressingly familiar.

There was a hope that the USA, with its dedication to individual liberty, free enterprise and constitutionally limited government, would remain that shining city on a hill as Great Britain and the Anglosphere fell victim to the global 'progressive' agenda.  That turned out to be a case of false optimism.

Like their counterparts in the rest of the Anglosphere, the American people allowed themselves to be manipulated by unscrupulous, agenda driven political elitists in pursuit of political power. They were seduced by the slick advertising campaigns of the professional PR men to such a ridiculous extent that they elected a man solely on the basis of his half white skin colour, his telegenic persona and his ability to read pre-written speeches off a teleprompter.

As the British people did with their media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, they totally ignored his lack of history, experience, achievements and his lack of connections with real people in the real world.  It didn't seem to bother the American people when it was revealed that candidate Obama was steeped in Marxist ideology, anti-white racial politics and anti-American radical socialism.

When candidate Obama stood in front of his fake Greek columns and stated to the world that he was "five days away from fundamentally transforming America", what on God's earth did the American people think he meant? They were obviously not watching the disastrous descent of the great European nations into bankruptcy, poverty and third world mediocrity which was the result of the imposed 'progressive' agenda that would shortly be imposed on them.

What we are witnessing today during the Syrian crisis is the result of America's descent into mediocrity because of the imposition of that same 'progressive' agenda; this slow evaporation of American influence did not go unnoticed in the Kremlin, Beijing or the caves of Tora Bora.

President Obama's performance at the recent G20 summit was abysmal and an embarrassment for the American people; it highlighted the world of difference between a worldly wise, experienced political operator, albeit a KGB thug, and an inexperienced, media created fake who's only experience is in community organizing.

When one looks back into recent history, it is unimaginable to think that a tinpot dictator from a nonentity of a country like Syria can cause so much grief and humiliation for an American President.

One has to ask what would Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bushes 1 and 2 have done in the case of Syria? Conversely, what would President Obama have done had he been faced with the Cuban missile crisis, the nuclear armed Mad Dog Gaddafi or the invasion of Kuwait by a tyrant like Saddam Hussein?

It must be remembered that on the brink of nuclear war, President Kennedy stood nose to nose with Nikita Khrushchev, a ruthless, dedicated communist, and refused to budge an inch, forcing a humiliating climb down by this political fanatic.

It must also be remembered that Ronald Reagan stood nose to nose with seasoned Russian cold warriors Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov (who like Putin was leader of the KGB) and Mikhail Gorbachev, resulting in the defeat of communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe.

For years Colonel Gaddafi had sponsored terrorist organisations around the world, from the Palestinians and the Irish Republican Army to Carlos the Jackal and the Red Army Factions. After several warnings from President Reagan and a few strategically placed cruise missiles, including on several of his homes, Gaddafi retreated to his Bedouin tent not to be heard of again until his demise at the hands of own his people.

This kind of influence and respect has all but evaporated and it is not difficult to understand why.

Like Great Britain and Europe, the priorities of the American 'progressive' elite changed from economic strength and the interests of their own people to:

State mandated equality and fairness, including equality of nations and cultural relativity.

Redistribution of wealth.

Expanding government and welfare entitlements.

Replacing individual liberty with so called collective responsibility.

Gender neutrality and sexuality politics.

Downgrading the military and much more.

One has to bear in mind that there are fifty Muslim countries on the planet with a population approaching two billion souls, which is almost twenty four percent of the world's population. It cannot be difficult to understand that these religious orientated people are repulsed by the obsession with secular Marxist equality together with the homosexual agenda.

What must they be thinking about the West's obsession with homosexuals and especially David Cameron's vow to send his team around the world to encourage all governments to legislate for gay marriage?

President Obama's lack of experience or leadership skills becomes glaringly apparent by watching his performance during the Syrian debacle. He has surrounded himself with like minded agenda driven fanatics such as Hillary Clinton and now the appalling John Kerry. They are like rabbits caught in the headlight of a child's tricycle. They simply do not know what to do.

In an attempt to emulate Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bush x 2, President Obama comes over all macho by making his infamous 'red line' threat over chemical weapons to the worlds media. He  looked as macho as a kitten when his bluff is called by Bashar al Assad and he failed to act.

In a cringe making attempt to save face, which only served to make him a bigger laughing stock than he already is, his red line suddenly becomes the world's red line. This is dismal and a pathetic attempt to absolve himself from blame.

The President, who doesn't think twice about using executive power to bypass Congress, tries to offload responsibility by demanding they vote on military action, which by his own account he doesn't need.

President Putin, who is wallowing in Obama's obvious lack of leadership and subsequent discomfort, rubs his nose further in the dirt by offering the life line of a negotiation which Obama gratefully accepts and asks Congress to delay their vote.

The world is watching as Putin's Russia replaces Obama's America as the power broker and main influence in Middle Eastern politics. To the dismay of freedom lovers around the world, the rookie is giving the so called master a lesson in global foreign policy.

In conclusion it's worth taking stock of the change in global influence since the western world committed Hari Kari by adopting the 'progressive' agenda.

The British and Europeans have been ousted from sub Saharan Africa by the resource hungry Chinese. The rest of Africa is dominated by the Muslim world from Egypt to Mali. As we have seen, the Middle East is becoming increasingly dominated by Russia and radical Islamic factions, including the supposedly defeated Al Qaeda.

Central and southern Asia, including India, is influenced by Russia with China dominating the Far East. The former western ally, Japan, dropped off the radar decades ago. Indonesia and the Pacific are increasingly being influenced by radical Islam.

Central and South America are dominated by socialist regimes who's political ideologies stem from Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara and Simon Bolivar.

Great Britain, Europe, the United States and the Anglosphere in general have rotted from the inside out and are now reduced to bystanders in an increasing hostile world. The descent into third world mediocrity is unlikely to slow down while 'progressives' such as Obama, Cameron, and the EU bureaucrats remain in control.

All is not lost however and freedom loving people of the world should take heart; there is one tiny glimmer of light in this dark nightmare of destruction. The Australian people have demonstrated that with resolve and leaders armed with the right policies they can consign the 'progressive' destroyers to the dustbin of history where they belong.

Update: Putin lectures America in the New York Times

Putin Humiliates Great Britain and America - Oh How The Mighty Have Fallen

Watching macho man President Putin using the G20 summit to impose himself and his country onto the world stage is a wonder to behold. Conversely, watching the pathetic performances of the Western leaders in response is an indication of how degraded their countries have become.

As the world knows, President Putin is nothing more than a KGB thug who uses the residual power of his former organization coupled with outright corruption to stay in power. Putin can put a lifetime of experience in the world of intrigue and power politics to achieve his dubious ends.

His two main antagonists are media created products of the Public Relations world with no experience in anything other than advertising, spin, media management and lying. One would think with this experience they would win the PR battle with Putin outright but it is now clear that he is beating them hands down at their own game.

To the inhabitants of the world outside of the comfortable, entitlement obsessed, politically correct West, President Putin is the macho hard man who spends his free time in the great outdoors and who is habitually photographed riding horses, grappling bare chested with giant fish or shooting bears in the wilderness. This may be PR but he is going some way to restoring the image of mighty Russia, and the developing world lap it up as opposed to what the 'progressive' West has to offer.

Barack Obama and David Cameron are two cheeks of the same a*se, they were both plucked from obscurity early in their lives and groomed for high office by the 'progressive' elite that seems to dictate world affairs outside of public scrutiny.

While Putin gives the impression of offering the world traditional values and policies which appeal to ordinary people and with which they can identify, the Western world led by Obama and Cameron are imposing the gender neutral, equality obsessed, multi-cultural policies of a secretive 'progressive' elite which appeal to nobody but themselves.

Obama and Cameron have turned the Western world into a laughing stock with their unwanted 'progressive' nonsense such as their obsession with sexuality politics and gay marriage, government imposed equality and fairness, degrading their once mighty military machines by social engineering, perverting and politicising their institutions to the point where their dedication to political correctness makes them unable to carry out the functions they were created to perform.

It's an indication of how far the mighty have fallen when a political thug from a mostly lawless, vodka drenched giant gypsy camp can dismiss Great Britain as "a small island- nobody pays any attention to them apart from the Russian oligarchs who have bought Chelsea". Ouch!

He has the confidence to call US Secretary of State, 'Hanoi' John Kerry a liar over al Qaeda involvement in Syria. The fact that both jibes are true does not alter the greater fact that the status of Great Britain and America is so diminished that their history can be ignored and they can be insulted and abused like seven stone weaklings in a school playground.

The British and American people have no one to blame but themselves when they take a long, hard look at the quality of person they have elected to represent them on the world stage.

To the ordinary people of the world David Cameron is more like a limp wristed Hugh Grant than a giant of Sir Winston Churchill's stature. His defence against Putin's insult has been compared to Grant in 'Love Actually'. Cameron's stated objective was to purge the Conservative party of the very policies that put the 'Great' in Britain and make it more modern and trendy; in the process he has finished a degrading project started years earlier by his political predecessor and traitor, Edward Heath.

Instead of building on the historical greatness of his country and using the relationships built up over centuries to positive effect, he is carrying on with the policy of managed decline initiated by his political predecessors in order to bring about an 'equality of nations' as required by the perverted notion of national and cultural relativity.

The people of the once great USA are now finding out to their cost what the British people have been enduring for decades. One would have thought that they would have been learning from the degradation being suffered by their trans-Atlantic cousins and taking steps to avoid a repetition in their beloved homeland.

What in God's name were they thinking when they fell for a vacuous, media created fake like Barack Obama? The facts were there for all to see. He was an empty suit without a history or any qualifications other than hanging out with Marxist professors, smoking dope and 'community organising'.

What makes matters worse was that after a disastrous first term, which he kicked off with an apology tour of the world, he wrecked the economy and humiliated the military by introducing the sexuality agenda. They then went and re-elected him for another term.

Obama's performance at the G20 is juvenile and an embarrassment for the American people. He is on record for all to see declaring his red line over chemical weapons in Syria and no amount of spin can alter this. His attempt at denial is more than pathetic and typical of the cowardice he displays with his constant blaming of others. Even 'Hanoi' John Kerry confirms Obama's red line.

The world no longer has any respect for Great Britain or the USA and as a result, the enemies of freedom are emboldened, the world is a more dangerous place and will remain so as long as these two media created fakes are in charge.

Great Britain is being harassed by Christina de Kircher, the mad woman of Argentina over the Falkland Islands; and by the bankrupt Spanish over Gibraltar. Britain is being overrun by beggars, street criminals and welfare colonists and Cameron is powerless to stop it. Cameron is managing the further decline of a once great civilization.

The United States of America is not far behind Great Britain and its decline will only accelerate while President Obama remains in power.

America's welfare bill is growing by the day with record numbers of scroungers shamelessly trading the work ethic that made America great for 'free stuff' that is earned by some one else.

The once mighty NASA is reduced to outreaching to the Muslim world and what's left of America's astronaut community have to hitch a ride to the Space Station they created from Vladimir Putin's Russia.

America's once mighty military is now a vehicle for social engineering and sexuality politics. It may still have enormous firepower but it has no respect.  America's enemies, especially those who worship death instead of life, are losing their fear and are looking forward with relish to meeting the first all women or gay regiments on the battlefield.

Pictures speak louder than words and the images that went around the world of the President of the United States of America bowing down to the King of Saudi Arabia has damaged the reputation of this administration and the country.

At this rate it will only be a matter of time before a real Count Rupert from a Duchy of Grand Fenwick fancies his chances.