Like him or loath him, one has to admire Richard Branson for the way he has used his entrepreneurial and self promotional skills to amass a personal fortune that the rest of us can only dream about.
From an inauspicious start with Virgin Records, he has created one of the world's most recognisable brands along with Microsoft, Coca Cola, McDonald's and Disney. In the process he has directly created hundreds of thousands of jobs and indirectly possibly millions.
I am sure it wasn't easy, and I for one don't begrudge him a single penny. What I do envy is a billionaire's independence from government. After paying all the taxes he his legally required to pay, he can do what he likes with his money and the politicians can go jump in the nearest lake.
Having such enormous wealth allows an immediate relief from the usual day to day tribulations of life in the west, such as mortgages, household bills, raising children, etc. but it also allows a person to get in touch with their philanthropic side.
Richard Branson has joined his fellow billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Ted Turner and many others by signing the 'Giving Pledge' whereby they promise to donate a proportion of their wealth to charity.
I have taken Bill Gates to task in a previous post over his breathtaking hypocrisy concerning his attitude to capitalism, the system that allowed him to get rich, and his support for socialist Barack Obama.
This is the President who continually demonises the 'rich' and who, if he had his way, would happily tax Bill Gates and his mates out of existence.
It is my contention that if Gates and the rest of the billionaires openly campaign for a socialist then they should put their money where their mouths are and give their fortunes to the government, after all the government know best how to spend everyone else's money.
Having made that point it has to be accepted that, unlike the rest of us little people, they are not going to hand their money over to the socialists so they should be commended at least for their pledge to give it away to the good causes that they deem most appropriate.
Although he is not a billionaire I would have thought that multi-millionaire Tony Blair, a man of deep conviction and concern for the poor and downtrodden, would do the same with his millions and sign the pledge to give it away.
One would think that a man who has spent his entire life advocating social justice, equality and fairness by the redistribution of wealth would be only too happy to set an example and start the ball rolling by redistributing his own.
Tony Blair could at least make a gesture by returning the $134,000 he is given to finance his private office, on top of his $108,800 pension, back to the hard pressed taxpayer.
There is the possibility that Tony Blair was not sincere when he made is maiden speech in the House of Commons on first becoming an MP:
"I am a socialist, not through reading a text book that has caught my intellectual fancy, nor through unthinking tradition, but because I believe that, at its best, socialism corresponds most closely to an existence that is most rational and moral. It stands for co-operation, not confrontation, for fellowship, not fear. It stands for equality".
It is in the public domain that Richard Branson, Bill Gates and the rest of them made their fortunes by using their talents and skills to innovate and build businesses often from nothing.
It is less clear however, how a career politician like Tony Blair, who's only talent was dissembling, lying and media manipulation could end up such a wealthy individual.
Blair who began his political career by writing a letter to that other socialist icon and reprobate Michael Foot, claiming that he "came to socialism through Marx" now owns 8 houses and has amassed a fortune reputed to be anywhere between $16 and $96 million.
Reports indicate that Blair and his venal wife Cherie have been cashing in on the contacts that he made while in office but surely this would go against their deeply held religious beliefs. They have met the Pope, after all.
Tony Blair refuses to abide by the openness and transparency in his business dealings that his government expected of us, the little people.
The web of companies he utilises to cloak his dealings would put Bernie Madoff to shame but, I suppose, when all is said and done he is a politician so sadly, different rules apply.
The truth is that socialist politicians are venal hypocrites of the very highest order when it comes to practicing themselves what they preach to others.
The list of talentless wealthy individuals that have infested Parliament, and still do for that matter, who preached socialism, equality and the redistribution of wealth but practice something different is a wonder to behold:
Socialist/Marxist Phony Tony Blair
ex Communist Peter, now Lord, Mandelson
Son of the Manse Gordon Brown, of moral compass fame
Red Ed Miliband and brother David of the infamous North London Marxist 'intellectual' circle.
Patricia Hodge, tax finder general who hides her own taxes through her company Stemcor.
Geoffrey Robinson, money lender to the dodgy Mandelson.
Nick Clegg and Senora Gonzales, loaded with Euro millions.
Anthony Wedgewood Benn and son Hillary, prolitarianised aristocrat.
David Laws, multi millionaire expense cheat who also cheated the law.
Chris Huhne, property magnate who advocates a mansion tax and windmills.
etc, etc. etc.
---------------------------------------------------------
Eastleigh Byelection Update:
There is still a week to go for the voters of Eastleigh to wake up and come to their senses.
It remains a mystery why they are still supporting the Lib Dems despite the information that shows them up to be the a party of liars, disseminaters and criminals who will sell them out to their European Union masters in a heartbeat.
It now transpires that their policy guru and one time fund raiser Lord Rennard is standing down to fight charges of being a sexual predator.
I don't want to pre-judge the issue but his party has serious form in the area of sexual shenanigans.
The latest odds are truly depressing:
Lib Dems - 1/4 on
Conservatives - 9/2 from 4/1
UKIP - 10/1 from 12/1
Labour 50/1 from 40/1
It would appear that UKIP are taking support from Labour. Good!
Friday, February 22, 2013
Thursday, February 21, 2013
White Londoners Are Now A Minority - Cultural Replacement Completed
If anyone was in any doubt that their government was engaged in a deliberate policy of demographic and cultural replacement then a recent census in London should act as a wake up call.
The census results reveal that white Londoners are now a minority in the capital city, making up only 45% of the population while immigrants, mainly from the Indian subcontinent, the Caribbean and Africa make up the rest.
Anyone who visits London, particularly its suburbs, cannot fail to notice the difference from a decade ago. The city is unrecognisable and one would be forgiven for thinking they were in a foreign land.
It is understood that London, being the capital city, an epicentre for the business world and a focal point for the world's financial markets, will be cosmopolitan to some degree, but this transformation goes far beyond that.
With the connivance of the political class, whole areas of London have been commandeered by various mono-cultural ethnic groups who have displaced the indigenous population and become self governing ghettos financed by the taxpayer via welfare benefits and entitlements.
White people are fleeing their traditional communities in larger numbers as they are deluged by non EU immigrants despite the promises of a clamp down by their political masters.
As an example, any rudimentary search of the web will reveal a whole host of companies in the major cities of Pakistan such as Lahore and Karachi who are offering expert visa services for those who wish to enter Great Britain. These include student, family, business and tourist visas.
Despite a much trumpeted government clampdown, there is still a roaring trade in spousal visas for child brides marrying elder close relatives.
The cultural disaster that has befallen London is being repeated in all the major cities of Great Britain including Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Leicester, Leeds, Bradford etc. In fact there is not a town or village that has not been affected by the governments deliberate policy of open border mass immigration.
The government is well aware that this demographic and cultural replacement is happening but refuses to act despite the fact the British people want it stopped.
It is a matter of record that anyone who dares to question the deliberate policy of mass immigration will be demonised, smeared and accused of racism and bigotry. Gillian Duffy and Clarissa Dickson-Wright being two cases in point.
At the same time without any action or condemnation from the government, benefit scrounger Anchem 'Andy' Choudary and his band of jihadi clowns are still calling for a Muslim caliphate and the imposition of Sharia law in Great Britain, by violent means if necessary.
Another example of diversity and cultural enrichment, that matches the Muslim paedophile gangs of Rotherham, Rochdale and elsewhere, has just been revealed. Three young British-Pakistani Muslims have been put on trial for plotting the mass killing of innocent people in the name of Allah.
These killings were being planned to match 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings in London. The local Muslim community in Birmingham were aware of what these savages were planning but shamefully remained silent. In the opinion of many this silence makes them accomplices after the fact.
These medieval barbarians were frequent visitors to terrorist training camps in Pakistan where they were taught the quaint British pastimes of bomb making and the mass murder of infidels.
Its ironic that August 14th, Pakistani Independence Day is widely celebrated by the British-Pakistani communities the length and breadth of the land and yet they still insist on blessing us with their presence.
In the meantime, professional Muslim whiner Yasmin Alibi-Brown and token Muslim female Cabinet member Baroness Warsi, are still complaining that the British people are Islamophic. I have a suggestion for the pair of them but this is a family blog so I will keep it to myself.
With the imminent arrival of hundreds of thousands of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants, Great Britain will reach the tipping point from which there will be no return.
The country will be defeated at last and with the connivance of its own treacherous political class, who are single minded in their determination to fundamentally transform our country into the multi-cultural cesspit that their perverted 'progressive' ideology demands.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastleigh byelection update.
Despite all the information that is available to them, i.e. the Liberal Democrats are a nasty, sly, lying bunch of guttersnipes, it would appear that the voters of Eastleigh are still in denial or in a Lib Dem induced coma.
If they won't listen to me they should listen to their own Mayor, Glyn Davies-Dear who has defected to UKIP.
"Why did I leave the Lib Dems? I left in disgust at the lies and the broken promises. The Lib Dems no longer care about the people, they only care about themselves"
Former Lib Dem councillor Andy Moore has also defected.
The latest odds are:
Lib Dems - 1/4 on
Conservative - 4/1 from 7/2
UKIP - 12/1 from 16/1
Labour - 40/1 from 33/1
The rest - 200/1 to 1000/1
The census results reveal that white Londoners are now a minority in the capital city, making up only 45% of the population while immigrants, mainly from the Indian subcontinent, the Caribbean and Africa make up the rest.
Anyone who visits London, particularly its suburbs, cannot fail to notice the difference from a decade ago. The city is unrecognisable and one would be forgiven for thinking they were in a foreign land.
It is understood that London, being the capital city, an epicentre for the business world and a focal point for the world's financial markets, will be cosmopolitan to some degree, but this transformation goes far beyond that.
With the connivance of the political class, whole areas of London have been commandeered by various mono-cultural ethnic groups who have displaced the indigenous population and become self governing ghettos financed by the taxpayer via welfare benefits and entitlements.
White people are fleeing their traditional communities in larger numbers as they are deluged by non EU immigrants despite the promises of a clamp down by their political masters.
As an example, any rudimentary search of the web will reveal a whole host of companies in the major cities of Pakistan such as Lahore and Karachi who are offering expert visa services for those who wish to enter Great Britain. These include student, family, business and tourist visas.
Despite a much trumpeted government clampdown, there is still a roaring trade in spousal visas for child brides marrying elder close relatives.
The cultural disaster that has befallen London is being repeated in all the major cities of Great Britain including Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Leicester, Leeds, Bradford etc. In fact there is not a town or village that has not been affected by the governments deliberate policy of open border mass immigration.
The government is well aware that this demographic and cultural replacement is happening but refuses to act despite the fact the British people want it stopped.
It is a matter of record that anyone who dares to question the deliberate policy of mass immigration will be demonised, smeared and accused of racism and bigotry. Gillian Duffy and Clarissa Dickson-Wright being two cases in point.
At the same time without any action or condemnation from the government, benefit scrounger Anchem 'Andy' Choudary and his band of jihadi clowns are still calling for a Muslim caliphate and the imposition of Sharia law in Great Britain, by violent means if necessary.
Another example of diversity and cultural enrichment, that matches the Muslim paedophile gangs of Rotherham, Rochdale and elsewhere, has just been revealed. Three young British-Pakistani Muslims have been put on trial for plotting the mass killing of innocent people in the name of Allah.
These killings were being planned to match 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings in London. The local Muslim community in Birmingham were aware of what these savages were planning but shamefully remained silent. In the opinion of many this silence makes them accomplices after the fact.
These medieval barbarians were frequent visitors to terrorist training camps in Pakistan where they were taught the quaint British pastimes of bomb making and the mass murder of infidels.
Its ironic that August 14th, Pakistani Independence Day is widely celebrated by the British-Pakistani communities the length and breadth of the land and yet they still insist on blessing us with their presence.
In the meantime, professional Muslim whiner Yasmin Alibi-Brown and token Muslim female Cabinet member Baroness Warsi, are still complaining that the British people are Islamophic. I have a suggestion for the pair of them but this is a family blog so I will keep it to myself.
With the imminent arrival of hundreds of thousands of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants, Great Britain will reach the tipping point from which there will be no return.
The country will be defeated at last and with the connivance of its own treacherous political class, who are single minded in their determination to fundamentally transform our country into the multi-cultural cesspit that their perverted 'progressive' ideology demands.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastleigh byelection update.
Despite all the information that is available to them, i.e. the Liberal Democrats are a nasty, sly, lying bunch of guttersnipes, it would appear that the voters of Eastleigh are still in denial or in a Lib Dem induced coma.
If they won't listen to me they should listen to their own Mayor, Glyn Davies-Dear who has defected to UKIP.
"Why did I leave the Lib Dems? I left in disgust at the lies and the broken promises. The Lib Dems no longer care about the people, they only care about themselves"
Former Lib Dem councillor Andy Moore has also defected.
The latest odds are:
Lib Dems - 1/4 on
Conservative - 4/1 from 7/2
UKIP - 12/1 from 16/1
Labour - 40/1 from 33/1
The rest - 200/1 to 1000/1
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Eastleigh Byelection - Latest Odds Reveal The Voters Are Still Asleep
It appears that the voters of Eastleigh are not emerging into the sunlit reality or coming around to the fact that the Lib Dems are a truly nasty party who do not have their best interests at heart.
There is just over a week to go for the voters to come to their senses and give the political establishment a kick up the backside by rejecting their spin and deceit and voting for a non establishment candidate.
Go on you can do it, you know you can.
Lib Dems - 1/4 on
Conservative - 7/2
UKIP - 16/1
Labour - 33/1
The Rest from 200/1 to 1000/1
There is just over a week to go for the voters to come to their senses and give the political establishment a kick up the backside by rejecting their spin and deceit and voting for a non establishment candidate.
Go on you can do it, you know you can.
Lib Dems - 1/4 on
Conservative - 7/2
UKIP - 16/1
Labour - 33/1
The Rest from 200/1 to 1000/1
Downton Abbey - Successful TV Drama Causes 'Progressive' Heads To Explode
I have never subscribed to the view that socialism or 'progressivism' as it is now called, is a mental illness as opposed to an addictive political philosophy.
As a former member of the hard left myself, I don't consider that I have been cured of an illness. It was more a case of growing up and seeing the real world for what it is instead of the mythical world created by the biased 'progressive' media establishment.
Judging by the reaction of a whole host of 'progressives' to the highly successful TV drama series Downton Abbey I am beginning to change my mind, maybe there is something wrong with these people.
This award winning series concerning the fictional aristocratic Crowley family, the Earl and Countess of Grantham, and their domestic servants has become a phenomenal success on both sides of the Atlantic and indeed across the whole world.
With the conclusion of the third series and the shocking final scenes, the accolades keep pouring in, just as they did for the first two series.
Series 1 made the Guinness Book of Records for the highest critical review ratings for a TV show. It was also named as the most well received TV show in the world.
Series 2 surpassed series 1 in viewing figures and series 3 blew all the records out of the water. The series has so far accumulated the highest number of award nominations ever for a TV series, including Golden Globes, Emmy's etc.
In the United States, Downton Abbey has quadrupled PBS's prime time coverage.
As someone old enough to remember, the current drama is similar to the hugely popular TV series from the 1970's Upstairs Downstairs, which had an identical theme highlighting the different but intertwining lives of an aristocratic family and their domestic servants.
In a world where the people are bombarded with class warfare propaganda which demonises the wealthy and continually demands that the 'rich' pay their fair share, one would think that a TV series such as this would be a giant turn off for the viewing public.
It would appear that the viewers tent to identify themselves more with the sophisticated Crowley family members and their endless trials and tribulations, while at the same time they are irritated by the petty vindictiveness of the servants below stairs.
This has turned the classic narrative of the left on its head. With their continual emphasis on oppression by the 'rich' and victimhood of the downtrodden, this is not supposed to happen which is the reason why the 'progressives' are not happy with the success of this series.
For example, in one episode it is pointed out to the Earl that due to his failure to modernise and move with the times his estate is going to go bankrupt. The Earl refuses to take any of the actions suggested to him because it would adversely affect the well being of his tenants.
In other words the supposed bad guy, the 'rich' Earl of Grantham, was portrayed as a kind, thoughtful employer who's priority was not his personal financial well being, or that of his family, but the welfare of his employees and their families.
At the same time below stairs one servant, in an act of pure vindictiveness, was conspiring to get her colleague sacked without a reference, which in effect would have made her unemployable.
To the 'progressive' media controllers this is nothing other than heresy and looking at it like this, one can see why they have gone into apoplexy.
Controlling the media, including the entertainment industry, is an essential part of the 'progressive' agenda. They believe that they must control the message and that message must always be about the oppressor and the oppressed, inequality, class warfare, hate the 'rich'.
Stirring up hatred is a potent weapon in the armoury of the left, hatred is their element, they swim in it, they love a good hate.
The reaction of the people to Downton Abbey and the turning on its head of the 'progressive' narrative of envy, has given us all a reason for optimism in that their propaganda doesn't always work.
Perhaps the people are getting tired of the same tired stereotyping and they are beginning to form their own opinions, perhaps they are nostalgic for the days of good manners and formal behavior.
If this is the case then the 'progressives' really do have cause for concern because their social revolution or fundamental transformation from liberty and prosperity into the droll, grey world of state mandated equality and fairness i.e socialism, is running out of steam.
Roll on Downton Abbey series 4 and long live good manners, stiff collars, liberty and freedom.
As a former member of the hard left myself, I don't consider that I have been cured of an illness. It was more a case of growing up and seeing the real world for what it is instead of the mythical world created by the biased 'progressive' media establishment.
Judging by the reaction of a whole host of 'progressives' to the highly successful TV drama series Downton Abbey I am beginning to change my mind, maybe there is something wrong with these people.
This award winning series concerning the fictional aristocratic Crowley family, the Earl and Countess of Grantham, and their domestic servants has become a phenomenal success on both sides of the Atlantic and indeed across the whole world.
With the conclusion of the third series and the shocking final scenes, the accolades keep pouring in, just as they did for the first two series.
Series 1 made the Guinness Book of Records for the highest critical review ratings for a TV show. It was also named as the most well received TV show in the world.
Series 2 surpassed series 1 in viewing figures and series 3 blew all the records out of the water. The series has so far accumulated the highest number of award nominations ever for a TV series, including Golden Globes, Emmy's etc.
In the United States, Downton Abbey has quadrupled PBS's prime time coverage.
As someone old enough to remember, the current drama is similar to the hugely popular TV series from the 1970's Upstairs Downstairs, which had an identical theme highlighting the different but intertwining lives of an aristocratic family and their domestic servants.
In a world where the people are bombarded with class warfare propaganda which demonises the wealthy and continually demands that the 'rich' pay their fair share, one would think that a TV series such as this would be a giant turn off for the viewing public.
It would appear that the viewers tent to identify themselves more with the sophisticated Crowley family members and their endless trials and tribulations, while at the same time they are irritated by the petty vindictiveness of the servants below stairs.
This has turned the classic narrative of the left on its head. With their continual emphasis on oppression by the 'rich' and victimhood of the downtrodden, this is not supposed to happen which is the reason why the 'progressives' are not happy with the success of this series.
For example, in one episode it is pointed out to the Earl that due to his failure to modernise and move with the times his estate is going to go bankrupt. The Earl refuses to take any of the actions suggested to him because it would adversely affect the well being of his tenants.
In other words the supposed bad guy, the 'rich' Earl of Grantham, was portrayed as a kind, thoughtful employer who's priority was not his personal financial well being, or that of his family, but the welfare of his employees and their families.
At the same time below stairs one servant, in an act of pure vindictiveness, was conspiring to get her colleague sacked without a reference, which in effect would have made her unemployable.
To the 'progressive' media controllers this is nothing other than heresy and looking at it like this, one can see why they have gone into apoplexy.
Controlling the media, including the entertainment industry, is an essential part of the 'progressive' agenda. They believe that they must control the message and that message must always be about the oppressor and the oppressed, inequality, class warfare, hate the 'rich'.
Stirring up hatred is a potent weapon in the armoury of the left, hatred is their element, they swim in it, they love a good hate.
The reaction of the people to Downton Abbey and the turning on its head of the 'progressive' narrative of envy, has given us all a reason for optimism in that their propaganda doesn't always work.
Perhaps the people are getting tired of the same tired stereotyping and they are beginning to form their own opinions, perhaps they are nostalgic for the days of good manners and formal behavior.
If this is the case then the 'progressives' really do have cause for concern because their social revolution or fundamental transformation from liberty and prosperity into the droll, grey world of state mandated equality and fairness i.e socialism, is running out of steam.
Roll on Downton Abbey series 4 and long live good manners, stiff collars, liberty and freedom.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
UKIP And The Independents - An Alternative To Consider
Since the last three posts have featured the main political parties (LibLabCon) in the up and coming Eastleigh byelection, so in the interests of balance there should be some space dedicated to the other parties who, in a democratic election deserve be heard.
It is now universally accepted that the three main parties have identical policies on the issues that concern the people most and that these policies ignore the wishes of the people in order to further the supranational transformation agenda.
To remind ourselves of the issues that are of most concern to the people of Eastleigh, and to the British people as a whole, together with the LibLabCon response:
On the economy, all three parties are following the tax, spend, borrow and debt lunacy backed up with money printing. This of course was the signal policy of the demented Gordon Brown and his socialist bag carriers.
LibLabCon refuse to address welfare dependency effectively and in the case of LibLab they actively encourage it in exchange for votes.
All three parties are identical when it comes to the transfer of sovereignty to the European Union and the refusal of a timely In/Out referendum for the people.
Despite their faux concern, LibLabCon are all actively participating the cultural replacement agenda via open border mass immigration.
None of the three parties will address the issue of the impending disastrous arrival of tens of thousands of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria.
Again, despite the propaganda, all three parties will obey their masters in Brussels and allow unfettered access of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants, and all other immigrants for that matter, to the already strained public services. This will include welfare cash benefits, housing, healthcare and education.
Diversity and cultural enrichment will take priority over the needs of the indigenous population, so if you are on the council house waiting list or waiting in line for an operation or even trying trying to get a school place of your choice, tough luck, your concerns are not the concerns of the main political leaders.
All three main parties refuse to deal with the hated Human Rights Act putting the rights of immigrants and criminals, including paedophiles, rapists and murderers, before the interests and safety of the British people.
The voters of Eastleigh have this information so there are no excuses, if they vote for any of these charlatans then they get what they deserve.
So what are the alternatives for them to consider?
First and foremost must be the United Kingdom Independence Party, universally known as UKIP. Their candidate Diane James is not local but a nearish neighbour. She is a Borough Councillor and a healthcare worker.
UKIP is the preferred choice of political party for the tradition Conservatives who have been purged from their own party by David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron's modernisation programme.
Or to put it another way, they were exiled by Cameron's hijacking of the party and its realignment to the left in order for it to appear modern, trendy and 'progressive'.
The rise of UKIP has unnerved the main party elites to the point where they are now engaging in their usual tricks of smear and disinformation.
LibLabCon try to paint UKIP as a single policy one man band i.e Out of the European Union and Nigel Farage. Even a cursory glance at their policies exposes this for the nonsense that it is.
It is true that its main policy is withdrawal from the disastrous European Union but its also has viable policies on the economy (free enterprise coupled with tax and regulation reform), comprehensive welfare reform (welfare to work initiatives),
They plan a moratorium on all immigration until the whole sorry mess left by LibLabCon is sorted out.
There will be no mass immigration of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria.
The Human Rights Act will be repealed and the hated European Court of Human Rights will not have precedence over British Courts of Justice.
In a nutshell the UKIP plan is for Great Britain to regain its sovereignty from the totalitarian Eurocrats and remain the free global trading nation that is its destiny.
It must be noted that the three main party leaders, Cameron, Clegg and Miliband don't have the guts to debate the issues in public with Nigel Farage and the BBC refuses to give UKIP parity of airtime even though they are displacing the Lib Dems as the third party in British politics.
Next in the betting order at 200/1 comes the National Health Action Party represented by Dr Iain Maclennan. They oppose the coalition reforms and want the NHS to be driven by patient outcomes rather than financial targets.
This is a noble goal but a non starter for many who view the NHS as a socialist monolith left over from a bygone age. The NHS doesn't need reform but dismantling and replacement with a health service fit for the 21st century.
It is obvious, even to the layman, that the NHS is an expensive failure which is now used as a political tool by unscrupulous politicians.
Next in the pecking order at 250/1 is the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition represented by Darren Proctor. This guy is from the Rail, Marine and Transport Workers Union and oppose cuts in public sector jobs and the privatisation of public services.
Proctor's boss is the caviar communist hypocrite Bob Crowe, the trade union thug who brings misery to millions of working class people every time his useful idiots go on strike.
If you want Eastleigh to resemble North Korea then Darren's your man.
On the same odds is the Peace Party represented by Jim Duggon. Jim wants to create a society that is compassionate and respectful, among other things.
This is a worthy cause but I would suggest that Jim concentrates his efforts in the Muslim ghettos of London, Luton and the Midlands as opposed to Eastleigh.
He could start with opening a dialogue with Muslim nutcase Anjem 'Andy' Chaudary and his jihadist friends as they are in desperate need of some lessons in tolerance and peace.
The English Democrats also on 250/1 are represented by Michael Walters.
As far as I know this party has attracted the opprobrium of the 'progressive' left, including 'Call Me Dave's' detoxified Conservative Party, for having the temerity to champion England and the rights of the English people. They are also against what they see as the Islamification of England.
Because Michael Walters' Party is the antithesis of the multi-culturalism that is embraced by LibLabCon he will be demonised and smeared every step of the way.
Michael and his party deserve as much consideration as the mainstream charlatans who employ lies, disinformation and dirty tricks to garner votes.
The Independent Party at 500/1 is represented by Danny Stupple who is opposed to homosexual marriage and claims it was pushed through without a popular mandate.
They also want to take a stand against the powerful party machines which ride roughshod over the views of individuals and communities.
It sounds good to me so good on you Danny Stupple and best of luck.
The Wessex Regionalists also on 500/1 are represented by Colin Bex, they want self government for the ancient region of Wessex. Colin doesn't say whether they would stay in the EU if they gained their independence or whether they would have open border mass immigration from the rest of England. Speak up Colin.
I could find no information on the Christian Party as represented by Kevin Milburn, other than "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship". I would be interested in his views on the demonisation of Christian festivals by the current political establishment and the Islamification of England as mentioned by the English Democrats. They are also on 500/1
No election would be complete without the Monster Raving Loony William Hill Party, good luck to Howling Lord Hope. He'll need it with odds of 1000/1
The 1000/1 Elvis Loves Pets Party led by David Bishop has bought into the Man Made Global Warming scam, (which has been renamed 'Combating Climate Change') lock, stock and polar bear.
To further ruin his chances of winning this election David boasts of receiving a letter of commendation from none other than Lord Mandelson. That's my support gone David.
Finally we have Roy Hall at 1000/1 representing the Beer, Baccy and Crumpet Party. If its a choice between LibLabCon and you Roy, you've got my support.
** To my horror and dismay the latest betting reveals that the voters of Eastleigh are not paying attention or they are all as dumb as a box of rocks.
Liberal Democrat 4/9 on favourites
Conservative 9/4
UKIP 16/1
Labour 20/1
The only consolation is UKIP pushing Labour into fourth place.
It is now universally accepted that the three main parties have identical policies on the issues that concern the people most and that these policies ignore the wishes of the people in order to further the supranational transformation agenda.
To remind ourselves of the issues that are of most concern to the people of Eastleigh, and to the British people as a whole, together with the LibLabCon response:
On the economy, all three parties are following the tax, spend, borrow and debt lunacy backed up with money printing. This of course was the signal policy of the demented Gordon Brown and his socialist bag carriers.
LibLabCon refuse to address welfare dependency effectively and in the case of LibLab they actively encourage it in exchange for votes.
All three parties are identical when it comes to the transfer of sovereignty to the European Union and the refusal of a timely In/Out referendum for the people.
Despite their faux concern, LibLabCon are all actively participating the cultural replacement agenda via open border mass immigration.
None of the three parties will address the issue of the impending disastrous arrival of tens of thousands of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria.
Again, despite the propaganda, all three parties will obey their masters in Brussels and allow unfettered access of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants, and all other immigrants for that matter, to the already strained public services. This will include welfare cash benefits, housing, healthcare and education.
Diversity and cultural enrichment will take priority over the needs of the indigenous population, so if you are on the council house waiting list or waiting in line for an operation or even trying trying to get a school place of your choice, tough luck, your concerns are not the concerns of the main political leaders.
All three main parties refuse to deal with the hated Human Rights Act putting the rights of immigrants and criminals, including paedophiles, rapists and murderers, before the interests and safety of the British people.
The voters of Eastleigh have this information so there are no excuses, if they vote for any of these charlatans then they get what they deserve.
So what are the alternatives for them to consider?
First and foremost must be the United Kingdom Independence Party, universally known as UKIP. Their candidate Diane James is not local but a nearish neighbour. She is a Borough Councillor and a healthcare worker.
UKIP is the preferred choice of political party for the tradition Conservatives who have been purged from their own party by David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron's modernisation programme.
Or to put it another way, they were exiled by Cameron's hijacking of the party and its realignment to the left in order for it to appear modern, trendy and 'progressive'.
The rise of UKIP has unnerved the main party elites to the point where they are now engaging in their usual tricks of smear and disinformation.
LibLabCon try to paint UKIP as a single policy one man band i.e Out of the European Union and Nigel Farage. Even a cursory glance at their policies exposes this for the nonsense that it is.
It is true that its main policy is withdrawal from the disastrous European Union but its also has viable policies on the economy (free enterprise coupled with tax and regulation reform), comprehensive welfare reform (welfare to work initiatives),
They plan a moratorium on all immigration until the whole sorry mess left by LibLabCon is sorted out.
There will be no mass immigration of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria.
The Human Rights Act will be repealed and the hated European Court of Human Rights will not have precedence over British Courts of Justice.
In a nutshell the UKIP plan is for Great Britain to regain its sovereignty from the totalitarian Eurocrats and remain the free global trading nation that is its destiny.
It must be noted that the three main party leaders, Cameron, Clegg and Miliband don't have the guts to debate the issues in public with Nigel Farage and the BBC refuses to give UKIP parity of airtime even though they are displacing the Lib Dems as the third party in British politics.
Next in the betting order at 200/1 comes the National Health Action Party represented by Dr Iain Maclennan. They oppose the coalition reforms and want the NHS to be driven by patient outcomes rather than financial targets.
This is a noble goal but a non starter for many who view the NHS as a socialist monolith left over from a bygone age. The NHS doesn't need reform but dismantling and replacement with a health service fit for the 21st century.
It is obvious, even to the layman, that the NHS is an expensive failure which is now used as a political tool by unscrupulous politicians.
Next in the pecking order at 250/1 is the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition represented by Darren Proctor. This guy is from the Rail, Marine and Transport Workers Union and oppose cuts in public sector jobs and the privatisation of public services.
Proctor's boss is the caviar communist hypocrite Bob Crowe, the trade union thug who brings misery to millions of working class people every time his useful idiots go on strike.
If you want Eastleigh to resemble North Korea then Darren's your man.
On the same odds is the Peace Party represented by Jim Duggon. Jim wants to create a society that is compassionate and respectful, among other things.
This is a worthy cause but I would suggest that Jim concentrates his efforts in the Muslim ghettos of London, Luton and the Midlands as opposed to Eastleigh.
He could start with opening a dialogue with Muslim nutcase Anjem 'Andy' Chaudary and his jihadist friends as they are in desperate need of some lessons in tolerance and peace.
The English Democrats also on 250/1 are represented by Michael Walters.
As far as I know this party has attracted the opprobrium of the 'progressive' left, including 'Call Me Dave's' detoxified Conservative Party, for having the temerity to champion England and the rights of the English people. They are also against what they see as the Islamification of England.
Because Michael Walters' Party is the antithesis of the multi-culturalism that is embraced by LibLabCon he will be demonised and smeared every step of the way.
Michael and his party deserve as much consideration as the mainstream charlatans who employ lies, disinformation and dirty tricks to garner votes.
The Independent Party at 500/1 is represented by Danny Stupple who is opposed to homosexual marriage and claims it was pushed through without a popular mandate.
They also want to take a stand against the powerful party machines which ride roughshod over the views of individuals and communities.
It sounds good to me so good on you Danny Stupple and best of luck.
The Wessex Regionalists also on 500/1 are represented by Colin Bex, they want self government for the ancient region of Wessex. Colin doesn't say whether they would stay in the EU if they gained their independence or whether they would have open border mass immigration from the rest of England. Speak up Colin.
I could find no information on the Christian Party as represented by Kevin Milburn, other than "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship". I would be interested in his views on the demonisation of Christian festivals by the current political establishment and the Islamification of England as mentioned by the English Democrats. They are also on 500/1
No election would be complete without the Monster Raving Loony William Hill Party, good luck to Howling Lord Hope. He'll need it with odds of 1000/1
The 1000/1 Elvis Loves Pets Party led by David Bishop has bought into the Man Made Global Warming scam, (which has been renamed 'Combating Climate Change') lock, stock and polar bear.
To further ruin his chances of winning this election David boasts of receiving a letter of commendation from none other than Lord Mandelson. That's my support gone David.
Finally we have Roy Hall at 1000/1 representing the Beer, Baccy and Crumpet Party. If its a choice between LibLabCon and you Roy, you've got my support.
** To my horror and dismay the latest betting reveals that the voters of Eastleigh are not paying attention or they are all as dumb as a box of rocks.
Liberal Democrat 4/9 on favourites
Conservative 9/4
UKIP 16/1
Labour 20/1
The only consolation is UKIP pushing Labour into fourth place.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Socialist/Progressive Candidate Was Disappointed That Mrs Thatcher Survived Murder Attempt
Since the writ was moved for the Eastleigh byelection, which as we know was triggered by the criminal and deceitful behavior of the sitting Liberal Democrat MP Chris Huhne, the political parties have unleashed their spin machines on the town to do their worst.
It is at times like this that the general public gets to witness the natural behavior of the political class in all its ugly glory.
The spin, the lies, the promises they know they won't keep, the happy family photographs which convey the impression of domestic tranquility, the faux concern about local issues, it is there for all to see.
The most depressing part of this degrading spectacle, or the most laughable depending on how one sees it, is the number of dumbed down voters who fall for it. Far too many will actually believe every word of what they are told and vote accordingly.
It is refreshing therefore to see a some honesty in a candidate and it is hoped that the electorate will listen to Labour's John O'Farrell and form an opinion based on what he has said rather than on what the party spinners manufacture on his behalf.
O'Farrell is a typical member of the 'progressive' comedy writers rabble that infests the entertainment industry/BBC axis and who are much loved by the Labour Party and the Guardian for their celebrity status.
This fixation with celebrity is supposed to make the Labour Party, with its 19th century ideology, look modern and trendy in order to appeal to the younger voter. In reality there's nothing modern and trendy about socialism, it always has and always will, result in economic destruction, misery and an equal sharing of poverty.
This despicable John O'Farrell was disappointed that the democratically elected Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was not killed in the Brighton bomb blast that killed 5 and injured 31 innocent people, some of whom were permanently disabled, both physically and mentally.
It is worth quoting this retard in full, in order to experience the full callousness of his imbecility.
"...in October 1984, when the bomb went off , I felt a surge of excitement at the nearness of her demise and yet disappointed that such a chance had been missed. This is me, the pacifist, the anti capital punishment, the anti IRA liberal, wishing that they had got her, why did she have to leave the bathroom two minutes earlier, I ask myself over and over again".
The millionaire leader of the Labour Party and communist hypocrite, Red Ed Miliband, has endorsed this awful man and campaigned on his behalf, therefore we can deduce that he has no problem with his revolting views.
The voters of Eastleigh should be made aware of the mindset of their Labour Party candidate and if they decide to elect him as their representative, they shouldn't be disappointed or outraged if someone who disagrees with his socialist/progressive ideology blows up Ed Miliband together with a few innocent bystanders in the process.
To further demonstrate his treasonous views, O'Farrell expressed his disappointment that the British military, at the cost of 255 British lives, won the Falklands War against a brutal dictatorship that was guilty of murdering thousands of its own citizens.
These victims consisted mainly of socialists, communists and trade unionists i.e people of similar views to himself.
The whiskey loving General Galtieri invaded a sovereign territory and threatened to do the same to the British inhabitants as he did to his own people.
Not only did the British victory liberate the Falkland Islanders from tyranny, it also resulted in the downfall off the military dictatorship that had brutalised the Argentinian people for years.
Being a socialist or 'progressive' as they now label themselves, O'Farrell obviously follows his instincts by preferring a dictatorship to a country of free people. Dictatorship is in the 'progressive' DNA, they can't help themselves.
It would appear that O'Farrell has never been to Eastleigh and yet this is the candidate that the remote London elite are dumping on the people.
This is a clear demonstration, if any were required, that Red Ed Miliband and the Labour Party hierarchy hold the people of Eastleigh in utter contempt by inferring that they are incapable of choosing a candidate from their own community to be their representative in Parliament.
Regardless of the appalling mindset of O'Farrell, if the voters of Eastleigh fall the spin and lies of the Labour Party machine and elect this cretin, they will be voting for the continued fundamental transformation of Great Britain into the socialist dystopia that Labour's ideology demands.
This will include:
More tax, spend, borrow and debt with Quantitative Easing thrown in to devalue the currency and peoples savings.
More welfare dependency in exchange for votes.
Continued surrender of British sovereignty to the totalitarians of the European Union.
Continued cultural replacement, or ethnic cleansing of Anglo-Saxon culture, via open border mass immigration.
The Labour Party intends to put out the welcome mat for the hundreds of thousands of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria next January.
Under orders from their bosses in Brussels, they will allow these immigrants' unfettered access to all public services including cash welfare benefits, housing, healthcare and education.
The Labour hierarchy together with their trade union backers will do nothing to stop these economic migrants from driving down wages.
They will not amend their own Human Rights law and allow for deportation of foreign criminals who are released onto the streets to terrorise law abiding people.
The future of the British people and their long history of individual liberty and democracy is under threat like never before by an arrogant political class that is out of control.
The people of Eastleigh have an ideal opportunity to send a clear message to these charlatans by rejecting the candidates of the three main political parties or by choosing an independent from within their own community.
Fight back against the party machines and maybe, just maybe, it will set an example for the rest of country to follow and the people can start to reclaim the country that their ancestors died for.
It is at times like this that the general public gets to witness the natural behavior of the political class in all its ugly glory.
The spin, the lies, the promises they know they won't keep, the happy family photographs which convey the impression of domestic tranquility, the faux concern about local issues, it is there for all to see.
The most depressing part of this degrading spectacle, or the most laughable depending on how one sees it, is the number of dumbed down voters who fall for it. Far too many will actually believe every word of what they are told and vote accordingly.
It is refreshing therefore to see a some honesty in a candidate and it is hoped that the electorate will listen to Labour's John O'Farrell and form an opinion based on what he has said rather than on what the party spinners manufacture on his behalf.
O'Farrell is a typical member of the 'progressive' comedy writers rabble that infests the entertainment industry/BBC axis and who are much loved by the Labour Party and the Guardian for their celebrity status.
This fixation with celebrity is supposed to make the Labour Party, with its 19th century ideology, look modern and trendy in order to appeal to the younger voter. In reality there's nothing modern and trendy about socialism, it always has and always will, result in economic destruction, misery and an equal sharing of poverty.
This despicable John O'Farrell was disappointed that the democratically elected Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was not killed in the Brighton bomb blast that killed 5 and injured 31 innocent people, some of whom were permanently disabled, both physically and mentally.
It is worth quoting this retard in full, in order to experience the full callousness of his imbecility.
"...in October 1984, when the bomb went off , I felt a surge of excitement at the nearness of her demise and yet disappointed that such a chance had been missed. This is me, the pacifist, the anti capital punishment, the anti IRA liberal, wishing that they had got her, why did she have to leave the bathroom two minutes earlier, I ask myself over and over again".
The millionaire leader of the Labour Party and communist hypocrite, Red Ed Miliband, has endorsed this awful man and campaigned on his behalf, therefore we can deduce that he has no problem with his revolting views.
The voters of Eastleigh should be made aware of the mindset of their Labour Party candidate and if they decide to elect him as their representative, they shouldn't be disappointed or outraged if someone who disagrees with his socialist/progressive ideology blows up Ed Miliband together with a few innocent bystanders in the process.
To further demonstrate his treasonous views, O'Farrell expressed his disappointment that the British military, at the cost of 255 British lives, won the Falklands War against a brutal dictatorship that was guilty of murdering thousands of its own citizens.
These victims consisted mainly of socialists, communists and trade unionists i.e people of similar views to himself.
The whiskey loving General Galtieri invaded a sovereign territory and threatened to do the same to the British inhabitants as he did to his own people.
Not only did the British victory liberate the Falkland Islanders from tyranny, it also resulted in the downfall off the military dictatorship that had brutalised the Argentinian people for years.
Being a socialist or 'progressive' as they now label themselves, O'Farrell obviously follows his instincts by preferring a dictatorship to a country of free people. Dictatorship is in the 'progressive' DNA, they can't help themselves.
It would appear that O'Farrell has never been to Eastleigh and yet this is the candidate that the remote London elite are dumping on the people.
This is a clear demonstration, if any were required, that Red Ed Miliband and the Labour Party hierarchy hold the people of Eastleigh in utter contempt by inferring that they are incapable of choosing a candidate from their own community to be their representative in Parliament.
Regardless of the appalling mindset of O'Farrell, if the voters of Eastleigh fall the spin and lies of the Labour Party machine and elect this cretin, they will be voting for the continued fundamental transformation of Great Britain into the socialist dystopia that Labour's ideology demands.
This will include:
More tax, spend, borrow and debt with Quantitative Easing thrown in to devalue the currency and peoples savings.
More welfare dependency in exchange for votes.
Continued surrender of British sovereignty to the totalitarians of the European Union.
Continued cultural replacement, or ethnic cleansing of Anglo-Saxon culture, via open border mass immigration.
The Labour Party intends to put out the welcome mat for the hundreds of thousands of economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria next January.
Under orders from their bosses in Brussels, they will allow these immigrants' unfettered access to all public services including cash welfare benefits, housing, healthcare and education.
The Labour hierarchy together with their trade union backers will do nothing to stop these economic migrants from driving down wages.
They will not amend their own Human Rights law and allow for deportation of foreign criminals who are released onto the streets to terrorise law abiding people.
The future of the British people and their long history of individual liberty and democracy is under threat like never before by an arrogant political class that is out of control.
The people of Eastleigh have an ideal opportunity to send a clear message to these charlatans by rejecting the candidates of the three main political parties or by choosing an independent from within their own community.
Fight back against the party machines and maybe, just maybe, it will set an example for the rest of country to follow and the people can start to reclaim the country that their ancestors died for.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Lying For Votes - PR Man Cameron Demontrates How It's Done
For those people around the world who are immune to the spin, lies and deceit that their politicians use to get elected, the Eastleigh byelection campaign will be worth following in the coming days and weeks.
As they battle for votes the politicians' dissembling ways will be on display for all to see but only if one knows what to look for.
For those tribal voters who vote for a particular party because their fathers and grandfathers did, please read on and be enlightened.
Yesterday, Great Britain's Prime Minister and PR expert, David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron, found Eastleigh on the map, got himself chauffeured down there and entered the fray.
This man is an expert at conning the public and his dissembling, his deceit and his outright fibbing was a wonder to behold.
In preparation for his stage managed visit, his pollsters, focus groups and psephologists will have done their homework, firstly by identifying the demographic makeup of the electorate and secondly by identifying the issues that appeal across the electorate but especially to the undecided swing voters.
Identifying these issues is vital as these will form the basis of the promises that he and his spinners will have to make in order to secure the votes he needs.
Remember that Cameron is working to a fixed transformational agenda, therefore any promises he makes or any assurances he gives will be broken if they don't fit in.
The issues of most concern to the vital groups in this byelection are:
Without a doubt the top of the list is open border mass immigration and the strain that this puts on the public services, most notably the National Health Service.
Next is the imminent arrival of approximately half a million economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria when the temporary restrictions are lifted next January on orders from our masters in Brussels.
Then there is the access immigrants have to welfare benefits when they have paid nothing into the system.
It is no secret that 'Call Me Dave' is a committed Europhile who believes in the United States of Europe. This position is unpopular throughout the country and hence his party is hemorrhaging votes to the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP).
Therefore the first act in the electorate conning process was to select a candidate who professes to be Eurosceptic and who is also concerned about immigration. This is a cynical attempt to appeal to the people who have defected to UKIP and entice them back into the fold.
Cameron and his party apparatchiks know that even if his candidate's views were genuine, they would have no effect on the government's European or immigration policies and that they would be roundly ignored after the election.
In the short speech that Cameron made to a working class audience in Eastleigh, he shamelessly played on their fears and announced action plans and promises that would supposedly deal with their fears, promises which he knows will not be carried out and will be dumped once the election is over.
He promised a crackdown on foreigners using the public services by saying Britain would not be a soft touch for welfare tourists.
Absolute baloney. This is a standard promise given by all candidates and has been used for years. The politicians wheel this nonsense out at every election and unfortunately the dumbed down electorate fall for it every time.
Cameron went on to say he wants tougher rules to ensure that visitors do not take advantage of British generosity. What tougher rules? What Cameron wants and what he does are two different things.
Apparently he has asked 'officials' to draw up plans to withhold welfare payments, housing benefit and and legal aid from the Romanians and Bulgarians that are expected to flood Great Britain when travel restrictions are lifted.
What officials, who are they and what are their plans? Cameron knows full well that he will not be allowed to do this by his masters in Brussels.
With total insincerity Cameron feigns an understanding of his audience and shamelessly tells them what he wants them to hear.
"We are not tough enough about people coming here from the other side of the world who decide to use our health service. They have not contributed through their taxes".
This is just a meaningless statement which he uses to identify himself with the peoples fears and it contains no definitive actions to deal with the issue.
He then lays bare the truth about his powerlessness to deal with the issue of foreigners using the NHS.
"When people come here from outside the outside the EU, they should pay for the NHS".
Cameron is redefining 'real' foreigners as those coming from outside the EU.
Within the EU he goes on to say that NHS users should fill out forms before they get access to health care which are then subsequently used to reclaim the cost of treatment. This is never done so the taxpayer has to pick up the tab.
The truth is that all foreigners from inside or outside the EUSSR use the NHS but never pay up. The outstanding bills could fund better schools, more cops on the beat or even space flights in a nuclear powered India.
Cameron's solution to this issue is that "we need to do that better". If any members of the Eastleigh audience were satisfied with that answer then I have a used car I would like to sell them.
To coincide with 'Call Me Dave's" electioneering he used his Immigration Minister Mark Harper to help him con the voters into believing they are being proactive on the Romanian/Bulgarian immigrant front.
This collaborating bag carrier stated that the government is considering forcing Romanians, Bulgarians and other EU nationals to register for residency permits if they intend to stay over three months.
Please note this is only a consideration so therefore it can be quietly dumped once the votes are in the bag and the election is over.
As part of the electioneering process Cameron is able to claim to the voters of Eastleigh that he is dealing with their fears. He has set up a high level sub-committee who have been asked to find ways of reducing the pull factors for immigrants.
The voters of Eastleigh should check after the election on the existence of this sub-committee and what its findings were, if any.
To further show his toughness and determination to deal with the voters fears, Cameron also announced that he has set up this unit to look at "all the benefits people can get from coming here and asking whether it's fair". Whether it's fair for goodness sake!! He is taking the voters of Eastleigh for fools.
Apparently, this unit or sub-committee is going to examine whether the UK can restrict benefits for migrants from Romania and Bulgaria when travel restrictions are lifted next January.
While Cameron was making these false promises his bosses in Brussels were letting the British people know who is in charge.
EUSSR Commissioner Viviane Reding, who hails from Luxemburg, has ordered that migrants from Romania and Bulgaria must be treated in the same way as citizens from other member states who have the right to work and settle in the UK. That's cleared that one up.
The nonsense being spouted by Cameron and his spin machine is embarrassing and it really does insult the intelligence of even the most ignorant and dumbed down voters.
The voters of Eastleigh and the British public at large need to know, before the election, the truth about the disaster which is about to befall them next January, with the connivance of the political bigwigs from all the major parties.
Their country's borders are going to be thrown open to a combined 23 million+ desperately poor people from Romania and Bulgaria.
The government already has provisional estimates for the numbers that are expected to arrive but refuse to release them, firstly, because they are liars and cheats and secondly, because they are cowards of the highest order who are scared to release the figures prior to the election.
Private estimates range from tens of thousands in the short term to hundreds of thousands and possibly a million+ over a decade or so.
The effect on the public services, not to mention wages, unemployment and crime will be devastating........for the people that is, not the bigwigs.
Many of these migrants will be hardened career criminals and they will all have unfettered access to all welfare entitlements including health care, housing and education.
The truth is that these announcements from Cameron and his election team are spin, lies and false promises which are being employed to harvest votes from the gullible voters of Eastleigh who, they assume, do not have the ability to see this nonsense for what it is.
As they battle for votes the politicians' dissembling ways will be on display for all to see but only if one knows what to look for.
For those tribal voters who vote for a particular party because their fathers and grandfathers did, please read on and be enlightened.
Yesterday, Great Britain's Prime Minister and PR expert, David 'Call Me Dave' Cameron, found Eastleigh on the map, got himself chauffeured down there and entered the fray.
This man is an expert at conning the public and his dissembling, his deceit and his outright fibbing was a wonder to behold.
In preparation for his stage managed visit, his pollsters, focus groups and psephologists will have done their homework, firstly by identifying the demographic makeup of the electorate and secondly by identifying the issues that appeal across the electorate but especially to the undecided swing voters.
Identifying these issues is vital as these will form the basis of the promises that he and his spinners will have to make in order to secure the votes he needs.
Remember that Cameron is working to a fixed transformational agenda, therefore any promises he makes or any assurances he gives will be broken if they don't fit in.
The issues of most concern to the vital groups in this byelection are:
Without a doubt the top of the list is open border mass immigration and the strain that this puts on the public services, most notably the National Health Service.
Next is the imminent arrival of approximately half a million economic migrants and criminals from Romania and Bulgaria when the temporary restrictions are lifted next January on orders from our masters in Brussels.
Then there is the access immigrants have to welfare benefits when they have paid nothing into the system.
It is no secret that 'Call Me Dave' is a committed Europhile who believes in the United States of Europe. This position is unpopular throughout the country and hence his party is hemorrhaging votes to the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP).
Therefore the first act in the electorate conning process was to select a candidate who professes to be Eurosceptic and who is also concerned about immigration. This is a cynical attempt to appeal to the people who have defected to UKIP and entice them back into the fold.
Cameron and his party apparatchiks know that even if his candidate's views were genuine, they would have no effect on the government's European or immigration policies and that they would be roundly ignored after the election.
In the short speech that Cameron made to a working class audience in Eastleigh, he shamelessly played on their fears and announced action plans and promises that would supposedly deal with their fears, promises which he knows will not be carried out and will be dumped once the election is over.
He promised a crackdown on foreigners using the public services by saying Britain would not be a soft touch for welfare tourists.
Absolute baloney. This is a standard promise given by all candidates and has been used for years. The politicians wheel this nonsense out at every election and unfortunately the dumbed down electorate fall for it every time.
Cameron went on to say he wants tougher rules to ensure that visitors do not take advantage of British generosity. What tougher rules? What Cameron wants and what he does are two different things.
Apparently he has asked 'officials' to draw up plans to withhold welfare payments, housing benefit and and legal aid from the Romanians and Bulgarians that are expected to flood Great Britain when travel restrictions are lifted.
What officials, who are they and what are their plans? Cameron knows full well that he will not be allowed to do this by his masters in Brussels.
With total insincerity Cameron feigns an understanding of his audience and shamelessly tells them what he wants them to hear.
"We are not tough enough about people coming here from the other side of the world who decide to use our health service. They have not contributed through their taxes".
This is just a meaningless statement which he uses to identify himself with the peoples fears and it contains no definitive actions to deal with the issue.
He then lays bare the truth about his powerlessness to deal with the issue of foreigners using the NHS.
"When people come here from outside the outside the EU, they should pay for the NHS".
Cameron is redefining 'real' foreigners as those coming from outside the EU.
Within the EU he goes on to say that NHS users should fill out forms before they get access to health care which are then subsequently used to reclaim the cost of treatment. This is never done so the taxpayer has to pick up the tab.
The truth is that all foreigners from inside or outside the EUSSR use the NHS but never pay up. The outstanding bills could fund better schools, more cops on the beat or even space flights in a nuclear powered India.
Cameron's solution to this issue is that "we need to do that better". If any members of the Eastleigh audience were satisfied with that answer then I have a used car I would like to sell them.
To coincide with 'Call Me Dave's" electioneering he used his Immigration Minister Mark Harper to help him con the voters into believing they are being proactive on the Romanian/Bulgarian immigrant front.
This collaborating bag carrier stated that the government is considering forcing Romanians, Bulgarians and other EU nationals to register for residency permits if they intend to stay over three months.
Please note this is only a consideration so therefore it can be quietly dumped once the votes are in the bag and the election is over.
As part of the electioneering process Cameron is able to claim to the voters of Eastleigh that he is dealing with their fears. He has set up a high level sub-committee who have been asked to find ways of reducing the pull factors for immigrants.
The voters of Eastleigh should check after the election on the existence of this sub-committee and what its findings were, if any.
To further show his toughness and determination to deal with the voters fears, Cameron also announced that he has set up this unit to look at "all the benefits people can get from coming here and asking whether it's fair". Whether it's fair for goodness sake!! He is taking the voters of Eastleigh for fools.
Apparently, this unit or sub-committee is going to examine whether the UK can restrict benefits for migrants from Romania and Bulgaria when travel restrictions are lifted next January.
While Cameron was making these false promises his bosses in Brussels were letting the British people know who is in charge.
EUSSR Commissioner Viviane Reding, who hails from Luxemburg, has ordered that migrants from Romania and Bulgaria must be treated in the same way as citizens from other member states who have the right to work and settle in the UK. That's cleared that one up.
The nonsense being spouted by Cameron and his spin machine is embarrassing and it really does insult the intelligence of even the most ignorant and dumbed down voters.
The voters of Eastleigh and the British public at large need to know, before the election, the truth about the disaster which is about to befall them next January, with the connivance of the political bigwigs from all the major parties.
Their country's borders are going to be thrown open to a combined 23 million+ desperately poor people from Romania and Bulgaria.
The government already has provisional estimates for the numbers that are expected to arrive but refuse to release them, firstly, because they are liars and cheats and secondly, because they are cowards of the highest order who are scared to release the figures prior to the election.
Private estimates range from tens of thousands in the short term to hundreds of thousands and possibly a million+ over a decade or so.
The effect on the public services, not to mention wages, unemployment and crime will be devastating........for the people that is, not the bigwigs.
Many of these migrants will be hardened career criminals and they will all have unfettered access to all welfare entitlements including health care, housing and education.
The truth is that these announcements from Cameron and his election team are spin, lies and false promises which are being employed to harvest votes from the gullible voters of Eastleigh who, they assume, do not have the ability to see this nonsense for what it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)