Bombing Hamas And ISIS - Only Israel Must Show Restraint

The bombing of ISIS terrorists in Iraq and Syria must have come as a welcome relief for the much maligned Israeli government and the war weary civilian population of Israel as they emerge blinking from their bomb shelters.

As air forces from Great Britain, America and some Arab states rain down death and destruction on the latest bogey men from the Muslim world, one cannot help but be struck by the breathtaking hypocrisy of those politicians and Hamas supporters in the west who condemned Israel for taking similar action a few months ago.

Condemning Israel is putting it mildly; the first air strike in Gaza signaled the beginning of the usual tirade of abuse and mindless Jew hatred that accompanies any action by the Israeli government to protect its citizens from the medieval savages who have sworn an oath to kill every Jew on the planet.

Western governments, the anti-semitic elements that infest the 'progressive' community together with global organisations such as the United Nations and the European Union, joined forces to urge restraint from the Israelis or claim that their self defence actions have been disproportionate.

Urging restraint is all very well when one is living terror free in Washington DC, New York, London or Brussels but not so much when one is running with your children for dear life into a bomb shelter in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem.

What makes the hypocrisy worse is the fact that none of the countries currently bombing Iraq and Syria have been targeted, let alone hit, by a single rocket from Hamas or ISIS. Apart from the horrific murders of two American journalists and a British aid worker there have been no casualties in either Great Britain or America.

It is worth reminding ourselves that Hamas used stolen humanitarian aid money, and other resources that were intended for the Palestinian people, to stockpile rockets and other war materials in preparation for an unprovoked attack on Israeli civilians. They also built a series of tunnels for purposes of kidnapping children from Israeli kindergartens and other terrorist activities.

Hamas terrorists fired over four thousand five hundred rockets into Israel with the specific intention of committing mass murder and carnage of innocent civilians including women and children. It would be interesting to know what constitutes restraint under such circumstances.

In an unprecedented exercise to limit collateral damage to civilians, the Israeli Defence Forces dropped leaflets, sent texts and used all possible communication methods, including social media, to warn civilians to leave intended targets.

The British and American governments tempered their comments about Israel's right to defend itself with continual calls for restraint and for a ceasefire. The fact that Hamas broke every single ceasefire did not stop the pressure on Israel to be lenient and compassionate toward the people bent on its destruction.

It would be stating the obvious that in spite of the fact that there has not been a single rocket fired at Great Britain or America, let alone four and half thousand, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu will not be putting David Cameron or Barack Obama under constant pressure to show restraint in the same way that they and their acolytes pressured him.

Their justification for wreaking death and destruction in Iraq and Syria is that ISIS have threatened bloodshed and mayhem in Great Britain and America by operatives who are citizens of these respective countries. These proposed attacks on the British and American people is weak justification compared to the actual attacks on the Israeli people.

I cannot speak for the American people but their British cousins are entitled ask who is to blame for the thousands of radicalised Muslims who are either fighting the jihad in Iraq and Syria or who are acting as a fifth column ready to activate and kill British people in the name of Islam?

Driven by their fanatical determination to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on behalf of the global 'progressive' elite, it was the political class and their like minded cronies that allowed radical Islam to flourish in mono-cultural ghettos the length and breadth of the country.

Great Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron, by tolerating the existence of Muslim ghettos, promoting Islam as the 'religion of peace' and caving in to every Muslim demand is responsible for the creation of radical jihadis and must accept responsibility should they harm the British people.

Its ironic that David Cameron, and similarly Barack Obama, have created thousands of radicalised Muslim citizens of their respective countries and who continually laud their contribution to cultural richness and diversity then send hi-tech weapons of war half way around the planet to blow them all to smithereens.

In conclusion I will add that next time Hamas or Hezbollah or any other terrorist group attacks Israel, it would be incumbent upon those western leaders who have authorised and support the bombing of Muslim radicals in Iraq and Syria to refrain from pressuring the Israeli Prime Minister to show restraint while defending his people.

Footnote: I will add that I fully support any action, including bombing, that rids the world of the radical Islamists and jihadis that are causing death and destruction in all corners of the planet. Fight back, hunt them down, root them out and kill them all.

Update: This article was published before I got news of the barbaric murder of aid worker Alan Henning. My prayers are with his family and may he Rest In Peace.

Western Support For Hamas And The Jihadis Is Born Of Ignorance

 

The reasons why supposedly educated people from the developed world support Hamas during their unprovoked targeting of innocent Israeli civilians with rockets designed to kill and maim, can be put into several categories and these include: a) naivety. b) brainwashing. c) self loathing. d) adopted ideology. e) ingrained anti-semitism and f) ignorance.

Category a) applies to people who through a lack of vision or retarded emotional development believe they are doing the right thing by backing the perceived underdog.

Category b) applies to people who have a low resistance to spin or have been exposed to anti-semitic  propaganda, usually from an early age. This category tend to believe anything they are told by authority or read in the papers, they can also hate to order.

Category c) applies to those who for some reason hate themselves, their country and the system they were born into. A Caucasian kid wearing dreadlocks is a good example as this hair style is a political statement as opposed to a fashion one. They will side with any cause or group that despises their home country or way of life.

Category d) applies to socialists, communists, so called liberals and those that go around calling themselves 'progressives'. Hating Jews comes with the territory and is a non-negotiable ideological requirement. If one doesn't hate the Jews already then it must be learned or adopted in order to join one of these groups.

Category e) is troubling and inexplicable. Some people hate the Jews for no apparent reason, its almost as if they were born hating Jews. This emotion can lie dormant for decades or even a lifetime but can be ignited at any time with little or no trigger.

Category f) is the largest group and the one that is prevalent at the plethora of anti-semitic/pro-Palestinian demonstrations taking place in western capital cities. By giving succor and support to Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS etc. they are not only putting their ignorance on public display but they are signing their own death warrant when these people turn on them like a dog turns on its master.

For the information of the ignorant - Israel has been the homeland of the Jews for some three thousand years, over two thousand years before the birth of Mohammad. This is confirmed by historical texts and archaeological evidence. There has never been in all history a homogeneous, centrally governed country or state called Palestine.

Western people who demonstrate alongside Hamas, including politicians, need to know what they are supporting. Hamas is about killing every Jew as well as taking their land, this is plainly obvious if one takes the time to read the Hamas Charter. What is also obvious is that the western people who support Hamas haven't read it either therefore they fit into one of the categories mentioned above.

Some salient points for the reader to be getting along with:

Article 1 - Hamas draws its guidance from Islam i.e. the Koran

Article 2 - Hamas is part of the Muslim Brotherhood which is characterised by complete comprehensiveness of all concepts of Islam in all walks of life including: Views and beliefs, education and society, education and teaching, the hidden and the evident and all other domains of life.

Article 3 - Hamas jihadis have raised the banner of jihad in order to extricate the country and people from the oppressors' desecration, filth and evil.

Article 5 - The movement adopts Islam as its way of life.... its ultimate goal is Islam...its special dimension extends wherever on earth there are Muslims.

Article 7 - By virtue of the distribution of Muslims who pursue the cause of Hamas all over the globe and strive for its victory.. for the reinforcement of its positions and the encouragement of its jihad, the movement is a universal one.

The prophet said: "The time will not come until Muslims fight the Jews and kill them; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!"

Article 8: The Slogan Of Hamas

Allah is its goal, the prophet its model, the Koran its constitution, jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

This medieval barbarity consists of thirty six articles in all and everyone of them is bleak, dark and depressing. These people have no love of every day life no appreciation of beauty, nature, architecture, other cultures or anything else that we in the civilised world consider part of living.

Read the Hamas Charter here and be enlightened.

These are a barbaric people who's view of life revolves around their own perception of an omnipotent God together with the conquering and subjugating of infidels - while at the same time they dish out death like we in west dish out treats at a kiddies birthday party.

The stench of death surrounds Hamas like a black cloud of malignant evil and these are the savages that are getting support from western people and politicians.

Reading the Charter of Hamas together with its founding document, the Koran , should serve to enlighten the western supporters of Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS and the various groups of Palestinian murderers, as to the absolute requirements of their faith - wiping Israel off the face of earth and killing every Jew is not the goal, that would be the complete domination of Islam over the planet.

This is not negotiable, it is a requirement of their faith and this can be confirmed by the actions of British and western born Muslim kids going off to fight for their beloved global caliphate in Syria and Iraq.

The stark reality is that some European countries have already fallen and will have Muslim run administrations in decade or so. Belgium, Holland, Norway and Sweden are already blighted by Muslim demands and will soon be lost to civilization.

In the big scheme of things these are minor countries for the jihadis, the real prize being Great Britain and the USA. These two countries will be singled out for special attention because when these have fallen the rest will surely collapse like a house of cards.

Watching the anti-Semitic/pro-Palestinian protests in western countries together with the Muslim flags being flown from Town Halls and some areas in London, it should not be lost on the observant bystander that the emphasis is gradually shifting from Gaza to ISIS, their caliphate and the global jihad.

The useful idiots and the ignorant who give succor to these ambitious barbarians will be unable to see this and we all will all pay a heavy price when, armed with their western passports, the jihadis return from the battle field burning with religious zeal and skilled in the art of terrorism and war.

With a political class bent on using Islam and political correctness to end the British way of life and replace it with a so called 'multi-cultural society combined with a disarmed populace who have lost the will to fight, it will be like shooting fish in a barrel for the returning jihadis.

For those that wish to inform themselves about what motivates a Muslim to worship death like we worship life a copy of the Koran with explanatory notes is here.

 

Jihadi Flags Fly In England - Local Gestapo's Ban St George's Cross

 

In order to demonstrate their support for the mass murdering terrorist organization Hamas, the local councilors hoisted the Palestinian flag above their Town Hall in Preston, England. Not to be outdone, the corrupt Mayor of the quasi autonomous Muslim ghetto in Tower Hamlets, East London planned to do the same and hoist the flag over his Town Hall
(Preston here, Tower Hamlets here)

Nearby the residents of the Will Crooks Estate near Canary Wharf went one step further and displayed the flag of ISIS along with the Palestinian flag and other jihadi slogans. A reporter at the scene was subjected to anti-semitic abuse and physically threatened until rescued by a fellow journalist.
(F*ck off Jew stories here and here)

If anyone doesn't know by now ISIS stands for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and they are a merciless army of anti-western Muslim fanatics who are beheading and butchering their way across Syria and Iraq with the intention of setting up a global caliphate.

They represent the vanguard of the jihad against western civilization and have thousands of recruits from Great Britain, Europe and America. The people of the west, especially those who support Hamas and other radical Muslim organisations, should be under no illusions, these people are utter fanatics and they will stop at nothing. Their declared intention is bring their jihad to the hated west and that means you and I are considered legitimate targets. But I digress.

It may seem strange but the flying of flags in England is a measure of just how far the country's local institutions have been infiltrated and taken over by a dedicated group of Common Purpose trained anti-English bureaucrats together with an army of like minded useful idiots.

The Union flag, the Welsh Dragon and the Scottish Saltire make regular appearances on various flagpoles in England and under orders of the new British government in Brussels, so does the hated star spangled blue rag of the EU.

The same Grand Burghers of Preston even fly the Jamaican flag over their Town Hall once a year to celebrate the island's independence. At this point one is bound to ask why the Jamaican community go to such pains to celebrate their independence from England then leave their palm fringed, sun drenched Caribbean paradise for a struggling post industrial town on a damp, windswept island in the North Atlantic? But again, I digress.
(Jamaica story here)

There is one flag that attracts the attention of the aforementioned anti-English bureaucrats and that's the Cross of St George. They hate it with a passion and oppose its display whenever they can. If they had their way they would ban it completely, but as this is not possible at present, they give anyone displaying it a hard time by using threats and intimidation.

Teignbridge Council in the English county of Devon has banned local cab driver Denise Said from having two small Cross of St George stickers on her cab and threatened her livelihood if she didn't obey. A council spokesweasel claims they are denigrating and offensive to foreigners. Councillor Mark Walters confirmed that only a single complaint had been received.
(Denise's story here)

Radstock Town Council in the English county of Somerset has voted to stop flying the flag of St George claiming it is offensive to the town's sixteen Muslims. (That's 16 out of a population of some 5,600 souls).

John Clements of the Royal Society of St George condemned the decision as did Rizwan Ahmed of the nearby Bristol Muslim Cultural Society. Nasima Begum of the influential Muslim Council of Britain states that they encourage the flying of the St George flag as it unites rather than divides the country.


Labour Councillor, Eleanor Jackson was unmoved and obviously knows best, she insisted the flag will cause upset to Muslims and plans to fly the LGBT flag instead. What did England do to deserve this kind of visceral hatred? What motivates a creature like this to ban the flag of St George but fly the LGBT flag.
                                                                                  
(Jackson story here)

There are countless examples of anti-English bureaucrats and their useful idiots in the local authorities waging their campaigns to ban anything that is quintessentially English especially the flag of St George.

Cab drivers in Southampton, binmen in Liverpool, pubs in Croydon and so on and so forth have all been threatened on various occasions for displaying English patriotism but the weasels in Thurrock council in Essex take the biscuit.

On one occasion the cowards from Thurrock Council called the police to force cab drivers to remove St George flags from their vehicles despite the fact it was St George's Day.

The words from an anonymous spokesweasel demonstrates the arrogance of the modern day agenda driven bureaucrat and the assumption that they control the people rather than the other way round.  "In the spirit of St George's Day we are happy to let them display the flag but they will have to remove them after the event".  The use of we and they in this case should give cause for concern that the bureaucrats have a high opinion of themselves and assuming authority beyond their mandate.

These people are typical of the anti-English bureaucrats who are acting as the agents of the state and who are imposing multi-culturalism at local level. These are the Vichy France equivalents, the Judenrats who do their masters bidding by imposing the multi-cultural agenda on an unwilling people.

There'll Always Be An England - Not After The Ethnic Cleansers Have Finished There Won't.

Feel free to read this previous post here.

Token Muslim Baroness Resigns - Ummah First Britain Last

The resignation from government of the Baroness Warsi came as no surprise to anyone outside of the cloistered, incestuous world of politics. Her resignation does however raise many important issues each deserving of examination in their own right. It is the issues of tokenism and quotas together with the loyalties and self identity of the Muslim and Pakistani communities in Great Britain that will be discussed here.

The days when the British government represented the people and made their safety and well being the top priority have long gone, replaced instead by a remote, generic elite with an agenda of their own. This agenda does not include protecting the British people from their enemies, both foreign and domestic, or their way of life - on the contrary it's main objective is to replace the traditional British way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society'.

Who gave them the authority to carry out this cultural vandalism is not immediately apparent as the British people were not consulted nor did they give their consent. Looking back in retrospect it is obvious why this was done by stealth - the cultural and demographic replacement agenda was long in the planning and the plotters were well aware that if this had been put to the people it would have been overwhelmingly rejected.

This was a risk they were not prepared to take, instead they opened the borders to all and sundry then implemented a policy of rigidly policed political correctness to impose their transformation.  Their agents in the institutions and the establishment threatened and demonized anyone who had the temerity to even question their agenda. In addition to this they stuffed the establishment, the civil service, the public institutions and the government-media complex with highly motivated, like minded bureaucrats, apparatchiks and useful idiots.

Without a thought for quality, performance or suitability, the criteria for any position in a business or an organization, especially in the public sector, was no longer academic qualifications, relevant experience or merit, but race, religion, gender and sexuality. Equality laws and political correctness dictated that quotas and token appointees would replace more suitable candidates.

It doesn't take a genius to work out that quality and performance, together with any other measurable criteria, would plummet as a result.

On his usurpation of power, the self confessed 'Heir to Blair', David Cameron, set about purging the British Conservative Party of its traditional values on the orders of the 'progressive' global elite and his masters in the European Union. As a result, political correctness and quotas replaced qualifications and suitability for political office in his modernized, detoxified party and later on in government.

On the surface Sayeeda Hussein Warsi was the anglicised daughter of a Pakistani immigrant who worked his way up into the middle class and made sure his daughter was well educated. Despite her unsuitability, an educated, non white Muslim woman was ideal for a quota driven Cameron to display his 'progressive' multi-cultural credentials.

Rejected at the ballot box by her own people of Dewsbury, Cameron appointed her to the legislature anyway by making her a Baroness, this entitled her to sit in Great Britain's second chamber, a festering den of iniquity known as the House of Lords.

He made her the Co-Chairman of the Conservative Party itself and according to the party hierarchy she was a complete and utter disaster. After a meeting of the 1922 Committee one party elder is quoted as saying:

"I though she was appalling, she's got no idea" he went on to say that "I genuinely think she is the worse chairman we have ever had".
(See story here)

Undeterred by any criticism Cameron was unable to sack his token Muslim woman, consequently she was a complete and utter disaster in every position gave her, including the shadow Minister for Community Cohesion. (After centuries of existing perfectly well without one, the British people suddenly need a Minister for Community Cohesion).

Despite her past record of incompetence and failure, and to the consternation of his colleagues, Cameron brought her into the Cabinet, the innermost sanctum of government, as Senior Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and he also made her the Minister for Faith and Communities. (As well as a Minister for Community Cohesion the British people can't now exist without a Minister for Faith and Communities)

By their own admission the Pakistani community refuses to integrate, even the second generation born and bred in Great Britain regard themselves as Pakistani as opposed to British. As far as the indigenous British are concerned it would appear that a majority don't accept these ingrates as British either.

Sayeeda Warsi gave the impression that she was somehow different from the traditional Pakistani woman. She wore western clothes and spoke English with a distinct local accent and for all intents and purposes was as British as roast beef and Yorkshire pudding.

The indications that all was not as they appeared was there for anyone who was not prepared to accept her official manufactured image. In line with the Pakistani community in Great Britain at aged fifteen she had an arranged marriage in Pakistan to her cousin.

On government business, Baroness Warsi was mainly photographed in western attire but in a demonstration of solidarity with the Ummah, she turned up for her first Cabinet meeting dressed in traditional Pakistani garb knowing the media would be in full attendance.

Despite her best efforts to portray herself as a thoroughly modern British wife and mother with a high flying career in politics, her loyalty to her 'own people' in the Ummah proved too strong for her to resist.

The British government's support for Israel defending itself against an army of ruthless, blood soaked savages, who have a declared intention to erase all Jews off the face of the earth, has proved too much for her Muslim sensibilities. She resigned her position citing
government policy in Gaza as the reason.

It is incumbent upon Baroness Warsi to expand on the reasons for her resignation by explaining what part of British policy in Gaza she objects to. Hamas is a ruthless terrorist organization, that uses its own civilians, including children, as human shields. It has fired thousands of missiles into civilian areas of Israel with the intention of causing mass murder. It has commandeered aid money and building materials that was intended for the people to construct tunnels into Israeli towns and villages for the purposes of kidnapping and murder of civilians.

She should let the British people know what she suggests the Israelis do in the face of such a murderous onslaught by medieval savages.

Like the majority of the Pakistani community of all generations, her undivided loyalty is to the global Muslim community first and foremost, followed by the Pakistani people, thereafter all brown skinned people and somewhere in the far distance comes Great Britain and her long suffering people. 

Kerry Double Whammy - If Hamas Doesn't Erase Israel Climate Change Will

                                            
When the veteran Labour MP Frank Dobson described his party leader Red Ed Miliband and his inner circle as "useless" his word applied to the entire political class both foreign and domestic. The rest of his opinion is even more revealing and indicates the patronising attitude of an increasingly arrogant elite. He continued by saying that Red Ed and his Shadow Cabinet are only capable of delivering post graduate lectures instead of simple policies the voters can understand.

There we have it, the public are too stupid to understand what the professional, career politician has in store for them and judging by election results he may have a point. Dobson's interview with the hopelessly left wing Guardian newspaper contains two pearls of wisdom which when applied to the current political scene explain a great deal.

Firstly:

"you need to boil things down to a few simple, short, sharp concepts and say them time and time and time again".

In other words the government's deliberate dumbing down of the education system has been so successful that people have lost the ability to analyse information and form their own independent opinion. Their opinions can be formed for them by repeating slogans and sound bites over again ad nauseum until they are embedded in the subconscious.

Secondly:

Asked if Red Ed's inner circle are useless, Dobson agreed enthusiastically before clarifying that "not of sufficient quality and clarity" was a more accurate description.

When describing the current political class as 'not of sufficient quality' he hit the nail squarely on head.

The consequences of Dobson's observations are there for all to see - the people will believe practically anything they are told by a degraded political class, no matter how outrageous or ridiculous, if it has been repeated often enough.

Logic and empirical evidence are no competition for oft repeated official statements and propaganda especially when they are cascaded by a compliant bought-and paid-for agenda driven media.

There are countless numbers of detached, inexperienced people masquerading as politicians that are eminently unsuitable for high office, Red Ed being one, David Cameron being another, with the ultimate prize for unsuitability going to the community organizer, Barack Obama.

There is no one better to illustrate the points inadvertently raised by Frank Dobson, than US Secretary of State John Kerry with Israel and climate change as the propaganda driven issues.

Kerry may meet the criteria to be a U.S. Senator but in the eyes of the world he is totally unsuitable to be Secretary of State. His dubious war record, together with his Fonda-like trashing of his country, his accusations of war crimes against his brothers-in-arms and his socialist hypocrisy have rendered him untrustworthy and therefore ineffective.
(See one Kerry story here)

Being a modern day politician he uses propaganda, distortions, insults and soundbites as a matter of course and it doesn't take a genius to see through it and spot the agenda driven ideologue that lurks underneath.

Prior to the Ukraine and the Israel/Hamas crisis taking the front pages, Kerry was in Jakarta as part of an East Asian doomsday tour, warning the world that climate change is the greatest challenge of our generation. According to Kerry it is more dangerous than terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or even a nuclear armed Iran.

It may seem strange that such a world threatening issue hardly got a mention by the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who's priority seemed to be justifying her existence and raising her profile for a Presidential run.

Without a smidgen of empirical evidence Kerry warned that Indonesian fishing catches will reduce by forty percent, not thirty or fifty but forty. The recent farming problems in California are definitely caused by climate change as are the wildfires in Australia and Hurricane Sandy. According to a recent documentary all low lying areas, including Manhattan, will be under water in the not-to-distant future causing a global financial meltdown.
(Kerry on climate change here and here)

Being a Liberal or 'progressive' or whatever socialists are calling themselves these days in America, Kerry will be bound by an ideological pro-Palestinian terrorist/anti-Israel requirement and this is evident by his actions.

Despite the fact that Israel is defending itself from an unprovoked attack by ruthless terrorists who have a declared intention to erase Israel and the Jews from the face of the planet, Kerry continues to give Hamas succor and support while demanding concessions from Israel.

He has the compliant media on his side demonising Israel and the Jews to the point where violent anti-Semitism is on the rise, particularly in Europe. The government-media complex continues with the false narrative about stolen land and a Palestinian state when even minor research will reveal that Israel is the ancient homeland of the Jews and there never has been a Palestinian state let alone one with Jerusalem as its capital.

The John Kerry doomsday tour highlighting the greatest threat facing humanity has been largely forgotten as events in the real world interrupt the world of spin, lies and the global socialist agenda. How can a minor conflict in the middle east with a comparatively small loss of life call a halt to a mission to save the world from a catastrophe which could cost millions of lives?

Indulging in this carbon spewing shuttle diplomacy around the middle East and Europe is a pointless exercise if the lessons of his previous tour to East Asia are to be believed. One report has Israel suffering from water shortages and desertification due to climate change making vast areas uninhabitable.

Also Israel, being a low lying country with some areas below sea level, if the oceans are inexorably rising due to ongoing climate change then coastal Israel will be under water before too long making more areas uninhabitable and this war even more pointless.
(See story here)

Hamas can put down their arms, stop killing their own children and stop trying to erase Israel from the face of earth.  If John Kerry is to be believed climate change will do the job that any number of their rockets have failed to do. 

After Israel And The Jews Have Been Erased, Will There Be Peace?

As the battles rage in Gaza and criticism of Israel reaches a crescendo of naive hysteria, it is worth examining the consequences should Hamas and Hezbollah, together with the people that give them succour and support, were to achieve their much publicised objectives.

Western apologists for the Palestinians should be under no illusions, there is no ambiguity in these objectives, they are clear and precise with no room misinterpretation. Israel must be erased from the earth and every Jew subjugated or killed. There is no two state solution, every offer has been refused by the Palestinians as any deal will require an acknowledgement of Israel's right to exist.

It is safe to say that whenever hostilities break out in the region, the balance of news reporting is sympathetic to the Palestinian terrorists and hostile to Israel. These hostilities are usually the result of incursions into Israel by terrorists, resulting in the murder of innocent citizens, or rocket attacks intended to do the same.

Whatever the Israeli government does to protect its citizens it is always condemned, be it building a wall or an iron dome rocket defence system. Whenever the Israeli military respond to an attack it is always condemned as disproportionate. In the eyes of the worlds media and its more gullible readers, the Israeli government can do nothing right when protecting its citizens from terrorists.

History shows that western governments have hardly shown restraint themselves when faced with the same situation. It would appear that proportionate responses to unprovoked military assaults and terrorist attacks are only required by Israel.

When Hitler rained down his revenge weapons, the V1 'Doodlebugs' and V2 rockets, onto the civilian population of England, the Royal Airforce reduced the cities of Hamburg, Dresden and Cologne to rubble.

The response to the Libyan organised 1986 La Belle discotheque bombing in Berlin, in which two American servicemen were killed, was the bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi with some bombs hitting the civilian suburb of Bin Ashur. Hundreds were killed, including Hanna Qaddafi, the adopted daughter of Libya's dictator Mohamar Qaddafi

                                           

(See story here)

When Al-Qaeda flew three hijacked civilian aircraft into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, killing some three thousand civilians, the US Airforce rained hell down on Afghanistan and invaded the country. Tens of thousands of people were killed, including civilians. They continue to rain down hell to this day, using remotely controlled drones.

President Reagan's words after the Libya bombing apply to every nation but obviously not Israel.

"When our citizens are attacked anywhere in the world on the direct orders of hostile regimes, We will respond".

He argued that America was exercising its rights to self defence under Article 50 of the UN Charter. If that is the case then so are the Israelis but I digress.

The world should be under no illusions of what would happen should the Israelis comply with its critics and lay down their arms - Israel would indeed be erased from the face of the earth as promised and the Jews would be faced with another Holocaust.  Dwight Eisenhower, as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces during World War II, instructed that video and photographic evidence be gathered of the German extermination camps because he knew that sometime in the future attempts would be made to re-write history and deny the Jewish Holocaust.

If Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and its Ayatollahs, together with all the other medieval barbarians that inhabit that part of the world, get their way another Holocaust would be a racing certainty.

The Jews wouldn't submit themselves to annihilation a second time and would most likely seek exile once again and the ancient land of Israel would become the Jew free land of Palestine for the first time in history. With their objectives achieved the justification for Muslim terrorism around the world will be removed and peace should reign at long last.

Every so called 'progressive', every bleeding heart hand wringing liberal, every socialist with their faux compassion and false concern for justice, the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and every Jew hating anti-semite would now be able to come down from their ivory towers and their sanctimonious moral high ground to celebrate their part in bringing peace to the middle east at last.

One would have to be totally deluded to think that the centuries old animosity would end with peace replacing war and people of different faiths living side by side with in perfect harmony. The news reels from the middle east showing images of mayhem, destruction and murder that are available on the Internet and social media should give some indication of what will happen next.

When Muslims proclaim that everyone must submit or be subservient to Islam, they actually mean it and fuelled by the religious fervor of victory they will set about doing the bidding of their prophet.

Once the Jewish holy sites have been desecrated and destroyed, the religion of peace will turn its attention to Christians and other faiths. Their holy sites, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre etc. will be destroyed and overbuilt as is traditional after a Muslim conquest.  Cordoba Cathedral in Spain, Higha Sofia in Istanbul, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and the Hindu God Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya, India are classic examples of Muslim architectural triumphalism.

(Desecration story here. 1800 year old church burned by ISIS here)

Violence, murder and rape against centuries old Christian communities in Iraq is being perpetrated by rampaging Muslims while the Christian leaders obsess themselves with women priests, gay marriage, inequality, social exclusion and all the other trendy left wing 'progressive' nonsense that should be the preserve of the temporal.
(See story here)  

While the middle east is being cleared of infidels and kaffurs, the fifth columns in western countries will be awakened and activated to agitate in conjunction with battle hardened jihadis who have returned to cut off the hands that fed them and gave them sanctuary.

The British people, disarmed by their government and crippled by political correctness, will be threatened and intimidated into accepting Islam as an integral part of British life and they will be compelled to celebrate its festivals. Their own festivals and way of life will be deemed as offensive to Muslims and suppressed.

This can be dismissed as fanciful speculation but just a tertiary glance at some of the antics of the political class, together with their agents in the public institutions, will demonstrate the veracity of this scenario. Schools adapting their procedures and altering their holidays to accommodate Muslims, school children being forced to celebrate Muslim festivals, halal meat being made compulsory in supermarkets and stores. Employees refusing to handle pork products or alcohol are indulged and remain employed instead of being fired.

Hate preachers are allowed to spout their threatening anti-western filth unmolested by the same authorities that rigidly enforce political correctness for the indigenous people.

                                                 

Other European countries have practically succumbed already with Belgium set to become the first majority Muslim country within a decade or so. The Scandinavian countries, particularly Sweden, are reeling under the weight of Muslim demands and criminality, which includes the rape of women and children.

The great Satan will still be there and the traditional Muslim hatred for America and its people will continue unabated. They can expect particular attention and with the help of their traitorous politicians, fundamental transformation will include acceptance of Islam as equal to Christianity with the celebration of Muslim festivals being made compulsory. There is hope in that the governments attempts to disarm the people have been unsuccessful so far.

Even the revered Pledge of Allegiance is being desecrated in schools with kids forced to say it Arabic with the name of God replaced with Allah.
(See the story here).

These are likely scenarios but if they only happen in part it will mean massive upheaval, disruption and murder in the once Christian dominated lands. It is only Israel that stands between us and the mayhem the Muslim communities have promised to bring down on our heads.

If the west had any sense and self respect, it would ignore the hand wringing bleeding hearts and their Jew hating fellow travellers and give Israel all the support it can muster in order to save themselves from a similar fate.



  

Unleashing Hell In Syria - What's The Hurry And Who's Side Are We On?

When it comes to unleashing weapons capable of such awesome destruction on people we know very little about it's best to take several steps back to make sure the reasoning is sound and the repercussions are well understood.

If the latest opinion polls are to be believed then there doesn't appear to be much of an appetite for war among the peoples of Great Britain and America and for good reason. Politicians, particularly modern day career politicians, are not known for their honesty; in fact they are notorious for their propensity for spin, deceit and outright lying, as the British people found out to their cost.

As the world knows, the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair had already made the decision and committed the British people to war in Iraq long before he made the case to Parliament. When he did make that case it was a tissue of lies, exaggerations, 'sexed up' language and a media onslaught by his well oiled spin machine. Blair even ignored his own Attorney General Lord Goldsmith, who was also a personal friend from student days, as to the legality of his military adventure with President Bush.

As was revealed in yesterday's article, Tony Blair is suffering from a recognized mental affliction called the 'Hubris Syndrome', which appears to affect the political class more than any other group of people. The people of the Middle East, and the world at large, deserve an explanation as why a mentally unstable man with an appalling record of warmongering was appointed Middle East peace envoy representing billions of people from the USA, the EU and Russia?

The British team in this latest military adventure is being led by the increasingly arrogant Prime Minister David Cameron and the American team is being led by Nobel Peace prize winning Messiah elect, Barack Obama; both of whom have little or no experience of the real world or its various peoples and cultures.

Who can possibly have faith in a forty seven year old career politician who's only experience of the world outside of party politics is as a Public Relations executive at a defunct television company and a fifty two year old community organiser with no experience whatsoever in anything other than radical socialist politics.

Watching and listening to these two perform it is obvious, even to the casual observer, that like Blair they are also guilty of narcissistic behavior and hold very high opinions of themselves and their views to the exclusion of everyone else's.

Their arrogance and dictatorial behavior over gay marriage, overseas aid and the European Union, are clear evidence of their belief in the righteousness of their causes, or put simply, their belief that only they are right and everyone else is wrong.

Prior to unleashing death and destruction on the Syrian people, there are several questions that need to be answered.

There are so many different factions involved it needs to be made clear which faction will benefit from western interference?  What is more worrying is the fact that the majority of these factions despise the West and are openly engineering its downfall via violent jihad and various cultural replacement agendas.

It needs to be made clear what the mission goals are.  Is it regime change and if so, in favour of who? At the moment the choice appears to be between the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, al Qaeda or Hamas - all enemies of western civilization.

Will there be reprisal attacks by home grown Muslim jihadis in participating western countries? If so will the establishment and local authorities suspend the forced multi-cultural agenda?

To avoid another Afghanistan or Iraq, what is the exit strategy?

If Israel is attacked, what will the military response be? Will the mission be expanded to include bombing Syria's allies?

And the biggest question of all is why are western powers getting involved in an internal Middle Eastern conflict?

Arab countries including Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon etc. are all brimming with the latest western supplied military hardware and possess the expertise to use it.

Why don't these countries under the auspices of something like the Arab League sort it out for themselves? Or as Ms. Palin said, "let Allah sort it out".

David Cameron is using the humanitarian angle in order to justify his hurry to unleash hellfire on Syria.

"The West cannot standby and let this happen", claims Cameron in reference to the massacre of civilians using chemical weapons but the obvious response to this is, why not?

The West stood by while Hutu and Tutsi tribal members massacred almost one million of their compatriots in Rwanda. Who is to say that being hacked to death with a machete is less of a war crime than using chemical weapons. One of the beneficiaries of this horror is Rwandan President Paul Kigame who is now a favourite of Cameron's Conservative Party and is in receipt of hundreds of millions of taxpayers money via the overseas development aid scam.

The West stood by while Pol Pot murdered over one million citizens in the name of Karl Marx in Cambodia.

The West stood by while helpless, starving refugees were being massacred in their tens of thousands in Dafur, Sudan.

The West has stood by for over thirty years while Robert Mugabe has raped, tortured, murdered and plundered the Zimbabwean people into starvation and abject poverty.

The West has stood by for six decades while the Kim dynasty has brutalised, massacred and starved the North Korean people into submission.

The list goes on and on so it must be asked as to why Syria is being singled out by Cameron, Obama and the West for special treatment when the crimes of its rulers are mild by comparison to those dictators that went before?

In conclusion I would point out the insensitivity that can only come from an inexperienced elitist that has no idea whatsoever how real people think and react is on display with David Cameron. He is busy eviscerating the British military in preparation for it to be absorbed into the European Defence Force.  This process includes giving serving soldiers their redundancy notices while they are on active duty in Afghanistan.

This media created abomination abuses and pours scorn on the history of the British military then has the gall to expect our brave men and women in uniform to put their lives on the line in a military adventure that is not the business of anyone outside the closed political circle in which Cameron and his cronies live.

Update: This deserves a wider audience. There's more to Phony Tony than meets the eye.

Thanks to Steve