Great Britain Is On The Brink Of A Communist Disaster

History shows us that politics periodically undergoes  a re-alignment where the pendulum swings from one side of the political spectrum to the other. What it also shows is that the pendulum is on a ratchet which prevents it from swinging back to its original starting point but to a new starting point much further to the left.

This is certainly the case in Great Britain where the pendulum has ratcheted so far to the left that Jeremy Corbyn, a life-long communist, has seized control of the Labour Party along with his cadre of fellow revolutionaries.

This coup makes Corbyn the leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition in Parliament and who, according to latest opinion polls, will become the Prime Minister of Great Britain should there be a general election any time soon.

A career politician Jeremy Corbyn has never wavered in his belief that capitalism will be overthrown and replaced by a dictatorship of the proletariat as ordained by his ideological mentor, Karl Marx.

Not even the myriad of examples of human tragedies around the world caused by this perverted ideology will shake his belief or give him pause for thought for its hundreds of millions of victims.

Corbyn’s Comrade No1 is the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, John McDonnell, who always denied his devotion to communism until he was caught on video proclaiming his fealty to Karl Marx to a closed group of functionaries along with his life-long dedication to the overthrow of capitalism.

As Chancellor of the Exchequer he would finally have the power to fulfill his life’s ambition and such is his confidence of his own veracity he has published his economic plan for all to see. It’s standard Marxist economics which has proved so disastrous across the planet from China to Zimbabwe and a host of other unfortunate countries in between.

He plans the nationalization of key industries without proper compensation together with a tax, spend, borrow and debt policy on steroids with government supplied free stuff for everyone.

This includes the usual list of items that socialist wet dreams are made of:

Free healthcare

Free education for everyone from pre-school to pensioner including college and university

Cancellation of student debt

Free/subsidized municipal housing

A national living wage for everyone

Increased public sector pay

Increased welfare benefits

Expanded government

Expanded entitlements which will create more dependency and a bigger captive voter base.

It’s worth noting that McDonnell is on record as saying that “democracy doesn’t work for us” so increasing the voter base is a temporary measure to secure power before elections are reduced to a cosmetic exercise or abolished altogether. This diehard communist actually quoted from Mao Zedong's Red Book during a debate in Parliament.

To add to the misery of this impending economic disaster Corbyn and his comrades plan to instigate a social and cultural revolution by opening the borders even further than they are now to mass immigration from the third world with no limit on the numbers.

It’s also worth noting that this social and cultural revolution is as much to do with their visceral hatred of Great Britain, along with its people, its heritage and its way of life as it has to do with their devotion to a dictatorship of the proletariat.

Apart from massive borrowing, McDonnell and the government plan to pay for this largess in the time honored communist manner, i.e. taxing the co-called rich to the hilt and increasing the tax on corporations and businesses across the economy.

No communists worth their salt could possibly ignore their impulse to indulge in class warfare therefore inheritance tax will be raised to confiscatory levels which will effectively abolish private property.

Q.E.D. The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels.

Jeremy Corbyn’s Comrade No 2 is his Shadow Home Secretary, an ideological soulmate and former lover named Dianne Abbott. Notorious for her lack of intellectual prowess and being numerically illiterate, Abbott is a self-described ‘Afro-Caribbean’, as well as an anti-white racist and fellow communist.

She is on record as saying that she is ashamed to be British but like all socialist bloviators she has shown no inclination to find a more suitable country and leave.

Such is the dedication of comrades Corbyn and Abbott to communism, their idea of a lovers vacation was touring East Germany by motorcycle at the height of the Cold War.

The fact that tens of thousands of people were being arrested and tortured by the all-pervasive East German secret police, the Stasi, and hundreds more died trying to escape to West Germany was of no concern to the happy vacationers.

Like communists the world over, the tortured and the murdered are acceptable collateral damage to Jeremy Corbyn and his comrades in the Labour Party. They obviously consider the murder and oppression of hundreds of millions of people since 1917 to be a price worth paying for the greater good which to them is a communist dictatorship along the lines of the old East Germany and latterly Venezuela.

In a warning to the British people of what’s in store for them if and when this gang of communists should ever get their hands on the levers of power. All three of these ideologues, and it must be assumed the rest of the Labour Party, were high profile supporters of the Hugo Chavez revolution in Venezuela.

They openly celebrated his victory and lectured the British people on the merits of the Chavez revolution along with the benefits it will bring not only to Venezuela but to the rest of South America and the world at large.

They steadfastly refuse to this day to criticize the brutal Chavez/Maduro regime or acknowledge the disastrous consequences of communism for the people of Venezuela.

In a further and more sinister warning which the British people should take heed is another member of the Corbyn clique, the former Mayor of London Ken Livingstone. Publicly they keep this lunatic at arm’s length but covertly accept him as an ideological soul-mate and comrade.

Livingstone is a nasty piece of work if ever there was one; he is an unadulterated and very vocal communist ideologue, a Great Britain and Israel hater as well as a vile anti-Semite. He makes no secret of why he believes the Chavez revolution failed in Venezuela.

Livingstone maintains that Hugo Chavez made the mistake of not following the standard communist revolutionary practice off rounding up and eliminating the country’s elite after usurping power.

For those who are unfamiliar with the post-revolution practice as advocated by Ken Livingstone please note:

The first task after the usurpation of power is to round up and murder the leaders of all organizations that oppose the regime; the second task is to intimidate, arrest, imprison and torture any other opponents, no matter how minor, who raise a voice of dissent.

This practice is well documented and should be compulsory reading for all school children and those that support socialists and communists in the western democracies.

They should be made to study the post-revolutionary actions of Lenin and Stalin in Russia, Mao Zedong in China, Fidel Castro in Cuba, Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe and the creator of the killing fields, Pol Pot in Cambodia along with all the other mass murderers who believe that communism is the ideal and only economic system for their countries and the world.

The reasons why the British people, who fought over the centuries for the freedoms and liberty they enjoy today, and who made such a massive contribution to global civilization, are embracing such an oppressive freedom crushing ideology is open to debate.

There are however three reasons that are immediately apparent.

Firstly, the inability of younger generations to assimilate and analyze information then form an independent opinion. This inability to think for themselves has left them vulnerable to propaganda whereby their opinions are formed for them by slanted information disseminated by the agenda driven political elite.

This implanting of a single worldview is a classic description of ‘groupthink’ as used by Big Brother in George Orwell’s apocalyptic novel 1984 about a future socialist tyranny.

Secondly, the mainstream media, led by the taxpayer funded state broadcaster universally known as the BBC, are the purveyors of state propaganda which churns out its ‘progressive’ world view 24/7 through all its outlets including radio. This not only includes news and current affairs but all its viewing and listening programs including so-called light entertainment.

Thirdly, the lack of effective opposition in Parliament and the country at large to the onward march of socialism. The Conservative and Liberal Parties used to be the guardians of British values such as individual liberty, free enterprise, law and order, patriotism etc.  but even they have caught the globalist disease of ‘progressivism’ and its call for an egalitarian, borderless world in a post democratic age.

To conclude: In their government induced slumber and their ignorance of history, far too many British people have yet to grasp that they are one general election away from losing everything their ancestors fought and died for.

This includes their liberty, their prosperity, their culture, their heritage and their centuries old way of life.

Statues and Monuments Offensive To Commies That Should Be Removed

Toytown wannabe revolutionaries accompanied by an assortment of left wing loonies and spotty basement dwellers continue their destruction of statues and monuments in their campaign to erase history and rewrite it to fit their narrative. The following is a picture gallery to help their global counterparts decide which ones to attack.

Hammers are available at the nearest hardware store, face masks are available from your local Soros financed Commissariat.



The Kiss by Rodin: This public display of love between a man and a women is homophobic and guaranteed to cause offence to those from the LGBTTQQ1XXWTFGFY69.2 community.

The Easter Island statues: These statues are grossly offensive to any self respecting social justice warrior. As well as being sexist, there are no lady statues on the island, they are demeaning to natives by depicting them as brutish, thick and savage.

The Emperor Hadrian and his wall: This brutal establishment and imperialist dictator was the oppressor of the British peasantry and working classes. His infamous wall is a reminder of division and racism against the fiercely independent Scottish tribes. This monster is wearing a kilt so he is also guilty of cultural appropriation.

Queen Elizabeth, tear down this wall!.....then abdicate. Up the Revolution!

Lady Justice: Sitting atop the Law Courts at the Old Bailey in London, this is as overt a symbol of gender stereotyping as is possible. This insensitive object is guaranteed to trigger any member of the transgender community who may happen to look up as they walk by.

Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: This appalling image offends more people on the planet than any other. Over 1.8 billion Muslims shield their eyes whenever this image appears in magazines or the visual media. This statue is beloved of the Brazilian people so social justice warriors would be advised not to attempt its destruction themselves, rather they should contract it out to their allies in ISIS: they are the experts in statue destruction after all.

And finally the most famous statue of them all - David by Michelangelo: There's no obvious reason to destroy this iconic work of art other than its a famous work of art and might as well be destroyed since you are on a roll and the blood is up.

It is understood that when the adrenalin kicks in it can be difficult to know whats offensive and what is not and therefore difficult to stop oneself from destroying everything in sight that looks even vaguely bourgeoisie but please note the following:

Do not, repeat not, under any circumstances destroy this statue or any other image of this great man. Rather make copies and erect them in every school and college campus throughout the land.

It Doesn’t Take A Village To Raise A Child – Just The Government

People may wonder where liberals, or progressives as they refer to themselves these days, get their statist ideas and policies from in addition to their obsessive dedication to impose them on others.

They are not ideas and policies that are formulated by observation, consultation, personal experience, study or intelligent deduction.

They are arrived at by weak minds being indoctrinated by a seductive ideology that, when accepted as truth and adopted as one’s personal beliefs,  dominates the mind to the exclusion of everything else. This exclusion includes common sense and reason; subsequently, imposing them on others becomes a mission to be followed with religious zeal.

Reading about a controversial proposal by the far-left Scottish government for the state to appoint a legal guardian to oversee the raising of every child in the country is one issue that proves beyond doubt where modern politicians get their inspiration and guidance.

The signature issues touted by the political elite such as equality, redistribution of wealth, one borderless world etc. are all highlighted in The Communist Manifesto. What is also included but not touted so loudly is the destruction of the traditional family.

Written by Karl Marx, this holy book is revered by disciples of the nineteenth century philosopher who’s perverted ideology is responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of innocents around the world and the oppression of billions more.

Referring to The Communist Manifesto as a ‘holy’ book is not an attempt at sarcasm but the view of the late British historian A.J.P Taylor in his foreword to the 1968 edition. As an indication of the demented dedication of Marxists to their cause and where modern liberals/progressives get their ideas he writes thus:

“…Marxism has become the accepted creed or religion for countless millions of mankind, and ‘The Communist Manifesto’ must be counted as a holy book, in the same class as the Bible or the Koran. Nearly every sentence is a sacred text, quoted or acted upon by devotees…”

Contemporary Marxists may try to disguise their beliefs by referring to themselves as liberals or progressives but anyone reading The Communist Manifesto will understand the ideological foundations of their policies and the foreword by A.J.P Taylor highlights why they are absolutely dedicated to their implementation regardless of the deadly consequences for mankind.

The 'named person' proposal by the Scottish government is not the only indication of Marxism driving public policy, they are also proposing to prosecute parents on the grounds of ‘emotional abuse’ if they overly criticize their children during their upbringing. (Named person proposal here)

It’s not only the Scottish Parliament that wants to interfere with, or remove entirely, parental control over their children. In one of their reports the globalist controlled United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child make the claim that making your child attend church undermines their human rights.

This report also contains 150 recommendations where Great Britain could be contravening the UN Charter on the Rights of the Child including the freedom of parents to reasonable chastise their children. (UN report here)

Combined with sexuality and gender fascism this attempt by the state and the global elite to take over the raising of one’s children is one part of the wider plan of Marxists to destroy traditional family life completely.

(Scottish Parliament debate legalizing incest here)

(School Transgender Day. Children as young as four encouraged to explore their sexuality and gender here) 

These actions and reports are nothing to do with the welfare of children; if the UN bureaucrats or the Scottish Parliamentarians really cared about the human rights of children they would campaign against child abuse, especially girls, in places like Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand etc. along with the sharia controlled Muslim ghettos that have sprung up in Europe and the west. What they are actually doing is putting into practice the ideology as it is written by Karl Marx in his infamous tract.

People tend to be skeptical when given the fact that there is a conscious effort on behalf of western governments to destroy the traditional family but this is confirmed by the unambiguous statement in The Communist Manifesto and it is worth quoting at length:

“Abolish the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.”

The dangerous old fool goes on to proclaim that:

“The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”

The next quote from the unholy book reveals the foundation of the take-over of public education and the subsequent brainwashing of children by the Marxist teachers, professors and administrators that infest most schools, colleges and universities in the west:

“Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But you will say, we destroy the hallowed of relationships, when we replace home education by social.. ..The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more , by action the of Modern Industry”..

And so the tract goes on and on about the phony family, the phony hallowed relationship between parent and child, phony wives being treated by their husbands as mere instruments of production.(Cultural Marxists assault on the family here)

Anyone paying attention to modern western governments and the actions of the political elite, aided and abetted the establishment and mainstream media, will see that their guiding philosophy is Marxism and every action they take is in line with its teachings.

 

In conclusion, along with redistributive economic policies, gender and sexuality fascism, state interference in family life and the raising of one’s children are clear indications that those so-called liberals/progressives have usurped power and are working to implement the philosophy of a long dead 19^th century philosopher who’s perverted ideology has caused nothing but poverty, misery, death and oppression for the majority of citizens wherever it’s been imposed.

Study The Communist Manifesto by  Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels here

 

  

Socialism Strikes Again - Bankrupt EU Is Planning To Seize Private Wealth

Arrogant politicians are so full of themselves they refuse to listen to anyone or learn any lessons from past experience or historical precedent. This is particularly true of socialists whose minds are closed to anything outside their failed, poverty inducing ideology.

The Far-Left President of France, Francois Hollande, campaigned on a socialist ticket and was warned at the time that his policies would cause capital flight and an exodus of France's wealth creating talent which would eventually bankrupt the economy.

He refused to listen and went ahead regardless. He increased taxes to penal levels, extended and increased welfare entitlements and imposed a raft of other socialist policies in order to address those old worn out socialist goals of inequality and social justice.

And so it came to pass as predicted - the government taxed, borrowed and spent the French economy into oblivion, consequently condemning into poverty and misery the very people he was supposed to save.

President Hollande has declared a 'state of economic emergency' which is a spin doctor's way of saying 'bankrupt' without actually uttering the dreaded word. His solution is of mind-numbing stupidity and typical of an ideologue who is incapable of thinking beyond his ideology. He plans to pay employers to employ laid off workers but doesn't say where the money is coming from.

To make matters infinitely worse for the European Union and put it's project to replace the nation states of Europe with a single state; the German economy, which bankrolls the project, is facing financial ruin also.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has managed to destroy the mighty German economy with a combination of generous and extensive welfare entitlements, a suicidal policy of open border mass immigration from the poor undeveloped third world and bankrolling the bailouts of the failed economies of the Eurozone.

(Read the German and French bankruptcy stories here and here)

Another Greek bailout is looming in a matter of months closely followed by the failed economies of Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain - collectively referred to as PIIGS - along with Cyprus and the former communist Eastern European countries left over from the defunct Soviet Union empire.

It must be noted at this point that Angela Merkel was a Communist Party apparatchik in the old Soviet satellite state of East Germany which was a dismal totalitarian state where the people were kept oppressed by Stasi, the notorious and ruthless secret police.

Merkel, the most powerful leader in the EU will have been a willing participant in the repressive totalitarian regime therefore it can be fairly assumed that it runs in her blood like ice water. It's in her DNA.

Led by Merkel, how does the EU politburo react to the pending economic disaster that is putting their beloved superstate project in jeapordy?

It's no coincidence that as the crisis unfolds the ruling bureaucrats in the European Commission are floating two consecutive regulations. (This is what they do prior to imposing a regulation)

i) Issue each citizen and business of the nation states with a Tax Identification Number (TIN). This is widely regarded as a prelude to pan-European taxation. See here

ii) Compile a Register of Global Assets. The politburo need to know the total wealth residing in the EU, where it is held and by who. See here

Coupling the instinctive totalitarian nature of the socialists that run the EU and the precedent of seizing private wealth to bail out the bankrupt economies of Greece and Cyprus one can see where this is heading.

(Read about the Cyprus confiscation here)

One must bear in mind that the individual nation states already have systems in place to tax their citizens so this means that the power to raise money through taxation will be transferred from elected nation state politicians to un-elected bureaucrats at EU headquarters in Brussels who cannot be removed by popular vote.

One of the foundations of a free society "no taxation without representation" will have been surrendered without consultation and another nail will be hammered into the coffin of liberty, democracy and prosperity in Europe.

Most countries that make up the EU are mired in unsustainable levels of debt, even the supposed economic powerhouses of Germany, Great Britain and France. The drive to build an artificial country with a single currency has already broken the economies of the smaller Mediterranean countries and this, combined with the cost of the mass immigration disaster, is threatening to break the big guns also.

The politicians have spent the economies of Europe, especially the Eurozone, into bankruptcy and abject poverty. The national Treasuries are empty leaving only one remaining source of money for them to pillage, i.e. private wealth.

Totalitarianism and seizure of private wealth under the guise of common ownership for the collective good have been the hallmarks of socialism since it was first codified by Karl Marx. If anyone was under the impression that this failed economic system died with its creator in the 19th century I suggest they watch the actions of the EU politburo and be enlightened.


 

Politicians Seizing Private Bank Accounts - Why The Suprise?

The announcement that the politicians who were elected to represent the people of Cyprus were planning to raid their private bank accounts in order to pay for their own economic incompetence raises several important issues.

Firstly, the politicians of Cyprus did what politicians do the world over, they willfully and shamelessly lied to the people during the last general election campaign.

When the politicians were campaigning for votes, they knew then that they were spending their country into bankruptcy, it didn't creep up on them suddenly out of the blue or take them by surprise. Their annual budget statements revealed that spending was exceeding revenue, which in turn was racking up unsustainable debt that would have to be paid off sooner rather than later.

They knew back then that bankruptcy was staring them in the face but no politician mentioned in their campaign literature that raiding their constituents private bank accounts was being considered. They knew full well during the campaign that this thievery was an option but they didn't have the integrity to inform the electorate.

Secondly, the political scene in Cyprus is dominated by the left, including the communist Progressive Party of Working People, which is the second biggest party on the island. Also included in this gang of tax and spend redistributers are the Democratic Party, the Movement for Social Democracy and the Greens who name themselves the Ecological and Environmental Movement. Their combined share of the vote makes them the biggest political bloc.

Thirdly, this disrespect for other peoples private property is nothing new when it comes to left wing politicians. These people are ideologically driven and their ideology is not a secret if one cares to look.

"the proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degrees, all capital from the bourgeoisie and to centralize all instruments of production to the state" - The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

This disrespect for other peoples private property is not confined to the Cypriot political class, politicians the world over are also guilty.

The Blair/Brown/Balls regime in Great Britain treated the peoples money and assets as their own. They introduced over 100 new taxes, they sold half of the countries gold reserves, they looted pension funds and borrowed  to the extent that the British people will be locked into a high tax regime for generations.

The Obama administration in the USA is following the same policy by taxing, borrowing and spending their peoples money with abandon, while at the same time they are trying to convince the people that there is no debt problem.

Then we have France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, all socialist governments who have knowingly spent their countries into bankruptcy and who are now looking for alternative sources of revenue.

Fourthly, and the most important issue of all, is that Cyprus and its people have been nominated as the trial area for breaking the taboo of governments seizing private bank accounts.

This idea of using a selected area to trial a policy is nothing new. It allows the political class to implement a policy which they know will be unpopular. They then monitor the reaction and use this information to prepare their spin machine for the wider implementation.

Prime Minister Thatcher used this method for introduction of the hated poll tax in Great Britain. It was introduced in Scotland first as a trial. The Scottish people were also the trial area for various alcohol initiatives, including pub opening times and the minimum price nonsense recently abandoned by 'Call Me Dave' Cameron.

The idea behind the Cypriot bank account seizure is two fold. It introduces the idea to the global public that politicians can and will dip into private bank accounts when the 'need' arises. After establishing this principle, they will then proceed to manufacture a 'need' in the form of some kind of crisis.

It also satisfies their ideological belief that all property should be communally owned and redistributed in the interests of equality and fairness. Property in this context includes financial assets also.

The Cypriot politicians voted down the measure as we all knew they would but the wider goal has been achieved. The idea of governments seizing private money to stave off a crisis has been introduced into the public consciousness and will be revisited at a later, more opportune moment.

The politicians of Cyprus, and any other bankrupt country, who knowingly spent their country into bankruptcy should be held accountable and be prosecuted for their criminal irresponsibility. In addition to a long prison sentence, their private assets should be seized and used toward paying off the debt they created.

Gerard Depardieu Jumps Ship To Russia - Socialists Just Don't Get It!

..in the most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable:

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

The Communist Manifesto, Chapter 2 - Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1967 edition)

Despite of all the evidence proving that high rates of tax yield less revenue for the Treasury, one has to wonder if 'progressives' are constantly in denial or just plain mentally ill.

They seem to have the ability to ignore all the evidence and carry on with the belief that taxing an ever shrinking number of 'rich' people will finance an ever growing number of welfare recipients.

The evidence they ignore goes back as far as Cicero in 55 BC through to Art Laffer today, its almost as if Karl Marx has removed these peoples ability to understand simple economic theory or even to understand basic arithmetic.

"those who ignore history are destined to repeat it" is a well known phrase but it has obviously not been read by the current crop of brain dead, ideologically driven conmen that infest the worlds Legislative bodies.

I can remember the disastrous Trade Union dominated Labour government in 1970's Great Britain.

As is normal with socialist governments the world over, the British economy had collapsed into bankruptcy as a result of the government spending in excess of its revenue.

'Sunny Jim' Callaghan and his Chancellor of the Exchequer Denis Healy came up with the only possible solution that a socialist is capable of dreaming up.

It was so simple its a wonder that these two geniuses didn't think of it earlier and it was so effective that the aforementioned brain dead conmen still use it to this day to run their respective economies:

a) borrow more money

b) increase taxes on the 'rich'

Those of my generation who remember those days all know how it all ended and they would need to have a heart of stone not to laugh.

Denis Healy promised to 'squeeze the rich until the pips squeak'. (He claims he was misquoted but his actions proved the sentiment was there.)

He raised the top rate of income tax to a staggering 83% triggering an exodus of Great Britain's most talented people and artists, which was affectionately known at the time as 'the brain drain'.

Apart from British industries finest innovators and business entrepreneurs, high profile actors and rock stars were also jumping ship. Some headed for continental Europe but by far the majority headed to the land of individual liberty, free enterprise and low taxes, the United States of America.

The most notable exiles included The Rolling Stones, Rod Stewart, Michael Cain, Cat Stevens, Noel Coward, Tom Jones, David Bowie and surprisingly, The Two Ronnies comedy duo.

Tax revenue plummeted and Denis Healy had to take his begging bowl to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a loan.

Most people associate IMF loans with the backward economies of Africa, and South America but the Labour government of Callaghan and Healy managed to bring third world economic collapse to the once global superpower of Great Britain.

The last Labour government of Blair and Brown ignored history and repeated the Callaghan/Healy mistakes in a spectacular fashion. They opened the floodgates of spending and instituted over a hundred new taxes, including raising the top rate to 50% but were still borrowing in excess of 120 billion per year with the inevitable catastrophic results.

In addition to Great Britain, the socialist imbeciles running Greece, Italy, Ireland, Spain and Portugal all ignored history and followed the same perverted ideology which resulted in economic collapse and a typically socialist equal sharing of poverty and misery for their respective peoples.

One would think that with the lessons of history and all the misery and economic mayhem surrounding him the newly elected President of France, Komrade Hollande, would steer a very different course.

Alas no, he is an unrepentant socialist and he ran for election on a socialist ticket so his first act as President was to lower the retirement age and pay for it by increasing taxes including a top rate of 75% for the 'rich'.

If he thought there wouldn't be consequences the guy must be delusional or have a brain full of merde.

The most high profile Frenchman to jump ship was film mogul and business entrepreneur Gerard Depardieu who headed across the border to Belgium but in a humiliating development for Komrade Hollande, Gerard Depardieu has accepted citizenship from Russia which has a flat federal income tax rate of 13%.

What is not generally known is that Hollande's 75% tax rate has resulted in an exodus of French talent to London which is now home to the biggest French community outside of Paris. The top income tax rate in London is a mere, piffling 45%.

In Great Britain the cynical hypocrites in the Labour Party raised the top rate to 50% only months before they left office and subsequently the number of people declaring an income of 1,000,000 plus dropped from 16,000 to 6,000 costing the Treasury valuable revenue.

The same Labour hypocrites are squealing like stuck pigs because the current government has lowered the top rate from 50% to 45% which has resulted in an increase in revenue for the Treasury.

If any reader knows what planet these socialist morons are living on, feel free to let me know.

To bring this sorry tale up to date, it appears that the current Prime Minister of Great Britain, David ' Call Me Dave' Cameron has made such a mess of governing that he is in danger of losing power to the same gang of Labour Party socialists that wrecked the British economy in the first place.

To make matters infinitely worse for the global economy the newly re-elected President of the United States is also ignoring history and the recent high profile defection of Gerard Depardieu, by taking the first steps along the same road to socialism that is littered with the remains of the once prosperous European countries.

To the British and other impoverished Europeans, the Presidents' rhetoric is all too familiar, we've heard it all before.

"the broadest shoulders must bear the biggest burden"

or there's that old favourite


"the rich must pay their fair share".

or

" we are going to ask those who make more than $250,000 to pay a little more"

and then there is

"no one making less than $250,000 will see their taxes go up" (everyone got a tax rise on January 1st due to an increase in payroll tax of 2%)

and my particular favourite in reference to the balanced approach to cutting the deficit

 "you cannot cut your way to prosperity"

It was the British socialist Prime Minister 'Sunny Jim' Callaghan who said, when he was trying to reign in his more loony members that "you cannot spend your way out of debt".

So there we have it, the socialist President of the USA claims that "you cannot cut your way to prosperity" and a socialist Prime Minister of Great Britain claiming "you cannot spend your way out of debt".

Either way the result will be the same, the people will get screwed.

By electing a socialist to the White House the people of the United States are blissfully unaware what they have done.

They'll soon learn as their taxes start to rise year after year to pay for the expansion of welfare entitlements together with the amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants and above all to pay for the interest on their astronomical and ever expanding debt.

America Joins Europe In The New Dark Age Of Socialism

In the 1970's The Socialist Workers Party known as the SWP started to make its mark on the British loony left political scene. Their dedicated activists were to be seen picketing factory gates and workplaces the length of the country harassing the workers and selling their weekly rag sheet, known as the Socialist Worker.

I recall a banner headline in 1974 on the occasion of Richard Nixon's resignation above a blown up picture of his face: One Man Down A System To Go.

This anti-American sentiment was shared by the entire British left including the communist dominated Trades Unions and the Labour Party.

The reason is obvious, that while the American system of prosperity driven by individual liberty and constitutionally limited government existed, the equal sharing of poverty and misery offered by communism/socialism would be unattractive by comparison.

In contradiction to Karl Marx's predictions and despite the efforts of the Trade Unions and the hard left to incite a class war, the people of Great Britain were not the revolutionary type and they showed no desire to overthrow the established order or to replace it with a Soviet style communist autocracy.

The people were relatively happy with their system of multi-party elections even though they would traditionally grumble about the results.

To progress their cause the hard left offered themselves up for election under their own banner and were subsequently humiliated every time, attracting a derisory handful of votes and using up valuable resources on lost deposits.

The Thatcher and Reagan administrations were a bitter blow to the hard left as they offered an alternative to the socialist orthodoxy of government control over the economy, political power and the minutiae of everyday life.

These two administrations reversed the generational drift to left by setting the people and industry free from the communist dominated, and in many cases Soviet Union funded, Trade Unions, from the Labour Party and from ever intrusive government bureaucrats.

The old inefficient nationalised industries were sold off with share discounts for the employees and for the first time in history working class people became shareholders. Social housing was sold off to the residents at a discount so working class people became property owners.

To the horror of the global left, Thatcher and Reagan took their free enterprise philosophies onto the global stage resulting in the downfall of the Soviet Union.

The global leftists progress towards communist domination of the planet was put into reverse. People started to become independent of government by taking control of their own lives and removing once and for all the left wing establishments' reason to exist.

The Thatcher/Reagan defeat of communism had a galvanising effect on the left, they analysed their position and came up with a devastatingly effective agenda to usurp power and to put in place an infrastructure that would ensure governments like Thatcher/Reagan could never happen again.

Dropping the words communism and socialism and now referring to themselves as 'progressives' the hard left united, they put aside their ideological differences and infiltrated the existing political parties across Europe, the United States and the UN.

For 18 years in Great Britain they planned their revolution down to the smallest detail. They infiltrated and politicised the traditional British institutions ready for the day they took control.

Europe was already a cesspit of authoritarian socialism with the European Union taking over where the Soviet Union left off but in 1997 with the election of the the Labour government in Great Britain the transformation agenda to impose eternal socialism began in earnest.

This long planned and permanent fundamental transformation of Great Britain was benign in the beginning but was ramped up after Labours' re-election for a second term.

To make the transformation permanent the 'progressives' instigated what was in effect a scorched earth policy with the intention that any incoming government trying to clean up the destruction would be so unpopular they would be limited to one ineffective term.

The list of their crimes is endless but in summary:

Unlimited expansion of the state at the expenses of the private sector.

Unprecedented increases in direct and indirect taxation.

Ensuring high taxation and government control of the economy for generations to come by refusing to cut spending thus deliberately increasing debt and the obligation of debt repayment.

Cultural and demographic replacement, otherwise know as ethnic cleansing, by using open border mass immigration.

Carrying out a cultural war on traditional Judeo-Christian values allowing other cultures like Islam to dominate.

Creation of a dependent client state by extending welfare entitlements to almost everyone including immigrants who have paid nothing into the system.

Creating a permanent socialist voting proletariat by squeezing the middle class out of existence via taxation, envy and class warfare.

Controlling the media, effectively closing down alternative opinions.

Indoctrinating children via the education system.

Attempting to control thought and behaviour by zealously policing a political correctness agenda.

Disenfranchising the people by continually transferring sovereignty to unelected supra-national bodies such as the European Union and the United Nations.

The fundamental transformation of Great Britain from a free sovereign country based on individual liberty into a cesspit of socialist deprivation is complete. Great Britain is unrecognisable from the country it was a decade ago.

The capitulation of the American House of Representatives over the 'fiscal cliff' negotiations spells the beginning of the end for the American people.

With the re-election of President Obama for a second term the 'progressives' are on a high and they are determined to implement their long planned transformational agenda.....permanently.

As was the case in Great Britain, tax hikes for everyone with no accompanying spending cuts is how it starts, by the end of this administration the United States of America will be a unrecognisable from the one we know and love.

So as the America people wake up this morning to the new reality of defeat to the socialists they have finally joined the rest of us poor suckers who have been suffering the 'progressive' revolution for a decade or more.

The liberty loving people of the world were in denial when they thought that the last bastion of freedom on the planet would hold the socialist revolution at bay and in doing so it gave them hope that one day they would overcome and throw off the shackles of government engineered equality, fairness and misery. A

Alas they were wrong.

Ed Miliband - The Red Prince of Wales

If we are honest with ourselves we, the people of Wales, have no control over our own destiny. We are powerless. By continuing to re-elect the same servile Labour politicians over and over again, we have disenfranchised ourselves. We are predictable and therefore we are taken for granted.

The Welsh Assembly can be discounted, it's nothing more than a toothless quango. An expensive talking shop whose only purpose appears to be the distribution of other peoples money and lining the pockets of its Members.

Any powers that have not been transferred to Brussels by our traitorous politicians resides in Westminster. This residual power is currently wielded by a wealthy North London Tory career politician aided and abetted by a wealthy North London  Lib Dem career politician.

Wales, predictably, has invested all its political capital in a wealthy North London Labour career politician.

Welsh political power is divided between:

Plaid Cymru who are hanging on in there but are ineffectual outside their specific locations.

The Lib Deb power can be discounted and considered a wasted vote. Their day has been and gone. They should join that national embarrassment Lembit Opik in the annals of history.

Tory power in Wales is tenuous to say the least but being part the ruling party in the Westminster coalition they do have some minor influence and like governments before them they will be judged, by me at least, by results not spin.

The awful truth is that Ed Miliband wields political power in Wales, not Carwyn Jones or any other Labour politician. They tug a forelock on bended knee to Ed Miliband, they are his poodles.

Who is Ed Miliband, the other Prince of Wales? A look at his various biographies is very enlightening.

One cannot begin to understand Ed Miliband without reference to his father, a Marxist 'intellectual' who was a huge influence in his young life.

How Adolph, renamed Ralph, could even think about being a Marxist is beyond belief. The alter ego to Nazism, Marxism is an evil, blood soaked creed, responsible for deaths of some 100 million people worldwide.

It is said that once Karl Marx gets under the skin he takes over the brain and renders his victim incapable of rational thought.

The Miliband household was the epicentre for the North London radical socialist/communist circles and the young Milibands were involved in the proceedings from an early age. The Communist Manifesto appeared to be the guiding document of their lives.

Ralph Miliband was not just a radical communist, he was an absolute fanatic.

He recalls being in Highgate cemetery  "standing in front of Karl Marxs' grave, fists clenched swearing my own private oath that I would be faithful to the workers cause". "I thought of myself as a revolutionary socialist or communist" he continues.

Later, he goes on to say  "I don't know how faithful I was to that oath in terms of action. I am sure I could have done more, immeasurably more. But I have not from that day to this departed from the view that this was the right cause and that I belong to it".

Ralph is buried about 12 yards from his bloodsoaked idol.

Imagine the furore if a conservative 'intellectual' swore a similar oath at the grave of Mussolini. The BBC and the Guardian would be apoplectic.

In his book Socialism For A Sceptical Age, Ralph Miliband states that the construction of a socialist state is a generational journey. Moving toward the goal rather than the goal itself.

I have not seen any evidence that Ed Miliband is not a chip off the old block. He is still influenced by Marx's Communist Manifesto and believes that the wealth of the nation should be confiscated by the government and redistributed as they see fit.

He is an admitted egalitarian believing that everyone is equal, except that is, the ruling elite. Miliband himself is worth some 4 million. He could practice what he preaches and redistribute that first.

It is my belief that Ed Miliband is finishing the generational journey his father started. By his words and actions it is obvious to the astute that he is in the process of constructing that beloved socialist state.

This period out of office is a blip on the generational journey. A fourth term was unlikely so Labour left behind enough booby traps while in office to ensure that the coalition will be a single term government.

This is the man that wields political power in Wales. The Welsh Labour leaders are appointed vassals charged with keeping the Welsh people where they are in exchange for a bone off the table in the form of an annual grant.

We need new thinking in Wales together with a new direction and new leaders if we are going to save future generations from the drab, hopeless state of serfdom envisioned by Ralph and Ed Miliband.