Here we go again, as yet another bankrupt country joins the rest of the socialist world in poverty, misery and bloodshed it is not surprising that those high profile apologists for this perverted creed have all gone quiet.
Where is the multi-millionaire hypocrite Sean Penn? Surely he has finished his mourning period for his hero, the incompetent blood drenched tyrant, Hugo Chavez?
Where is former President Jimmy Carter who, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, pronounced Chavez's election victories as 'free and fair?
Where is Great Britain's high profile socialist and openly racist Member of Parliament for Hackney, Dianne Abbott, who championed Chavez and his successor, Nicholas Maduro?
Where, in fact, is their entire British Labour Party and Trade Union movement who, like the Hackney Hippo, hailed the policies of Chavez and Maduro as a shining example of socialism in action?
Enlightened people around the world would be unwise to hold their breath waiting for any of these cowards to stick their above the parapet and explain, not only the failure of socialism in Venezuela, but their support of it when all the historical evidence points to socialism's ultimate failure everywhere its been imposed.
It's difficult for normal people to understand why socialists/progressives find it impossible to learn the lessons of history or to work out that their beloved ideology always means eventual poverty, misery and bloodshed for unfortunate citizens on which it is imposed.
Maybe some socialist/progressive somewhere, just one would be enough, could help the informed people of world by letting them know where socialism has actually been a success. Just one country would do as it will at least give them something to look at and think about.
Maybe Penn, Carter, Abbot or any other socialist/progressive devotees could explain how a country blessed with an abundance of natural resources and with a population of only twenty nine million, can go bankrupt and descend into poverty, misery and bloodshed so quickly.
How can a country with abundant reserves of oil, petroleum, natural gas, gold, diamonds, iron ore, bauxite and hydropower go so spectacularly bust?
The informed people of the world warned of this disaster and continue to warn countries who are flirting with this malign ideology or who's political class are already embarking on this road to perdition. America and Great Britain please take note, socialism ain't going to work, not now not ever.
At this point, and for the benefit of socialist/progressives everywhere, its worth taking a quick audit of history to prove the point that they fail to address.
The USSR - the first official socialist country, reputed fifty million dead and descended into poverty and misery, except for the ruling political class. Finally collapsed under the weight of its own inefficiency.
East Germany and the East European Iron Curtain countries. Under the Soviet yoke of socialism with an untold death count. Widespread poverty, misery and bloodshed until its final collapse.
The Peoples Republic of China. Some fifty million dead with a population mostly made up of dirt poor peasants. The leadership are finally seeing the light and adopting a more capitalist economy. Since adoption of capitalism living standards have risen astronomically.
The Republic of Cuba. Tens of thousands of dead with widespread poverty, misery and bloodshed. This toilet of a country is starting to see the light and is currently on a mission to shrink the government and the public sector. Progress will be sporadic until long time tyrant, Fidel Castro, finally pops his clogs and goes downstairs to meet his maker.
The Peoples Democratic Republic of North Korea. A blood drenched socialist hell hole with hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of dead civilians. Widespread poverty, hunger and misery. There is no sign of an end to the peoples purgatory, where is the United Nations?
Ba'athist socialist countries of the Middle East which include Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria etc. All blood soaked hell holes who are yet to emerge from the Dark Ages.
Zimbabwe, formally the bread basket of Africa which is now reduced to famine poverty, misery and bloodshed under the wests favorite Marxist, Robert 'Butcher Bob' Mugabe.
France, an advanced, modern economy going down the pan faster than their socialist President Hollande changes his mistresses.
There are more of course but that should be enough for the socialist/progressive community to be getting along with. As a courtesy it would be appreciated if the said community can give an example of a successful socialist economy to help balance the debate somewhat.
It is worth noting that hypocrites like Jimmy Carter, Sean Penn and the rest of the multi-millionaire acting crowd never, ever relocate to the places they champion such Venezuela or Cuba: they always adopt the lifestyles of the 1%, in the country that made them and under the economic system they claim to despise and want to replace.
The barking mad lunatic Dennis Rodman appears to be a frequent visitor to his new pal, the North Korean tyrant, Kim Jung Un, despite the fact he and his family are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people. This nutcase knows where is bread is buttered and would never trade the capitalist USA for the socialist North Korea.
One has to feel some sympathy for the Venezuelan people in their hour of need despite the warnings that Chavez would lead them to ruin.
Its now incumbent upon the people of Great Britain and the USA to heed those same warnings and don't let our governments repeat the mistakes of Chavez, Castro, Mugabe et al.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Monday, February 17, 2014
Princes William And Harry Get To Work - Socialist Icon Chris Smith Gets To Shirk
Written in the first paragraph of the unofficial handbook of wannabe revolutionaries and the Toytown middle class Trotskyists that infest the hard left of British politics, are all the blood curdling things awaiting the Royal family come the revolution.
In the meantime the leadership of the working classes all come from the same mold and judging by their taxpayer funded wealth, and by the way their offspring are lining themselves up for 'safe' Labour Party constituencies, they are not far from being a hereditary monarchy themselves.
One has to have a heart of stone not to laugh at these idiots as they champion the proletariat from the comfort of their multi-million pound town houses and profess their unbending loyalty to the working masses from their country mansions.
Not only the hypocrisy of these faux champions of the workers but their sheer buffoonery was put on display during the recent floods in the English countryside.
As was the case with the death of 'Madiba' Mandela, the political class can spot an opportunity to whore for votes. They were falling over themselves to get their photographs taken wearing Wellington boots and wearing concerning looks on their unconcerned faces. These political charlatans go into the flooded areas "to see for themselves" the extent of the flooding when a better sense of the damage can seen by watching newsreels on the television.
These appalling people swarm around human tragedy like flies around a dead cat if they think they can get a photo opportunity and few votes.
The British people can still be reduced to fits of laughter when they recall their PR and media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, travelling on a dog sled in Greenland "to see for himself" a glacier retreating supposedly due to Man Made Global Warming.
The fact that the glacier had been retreating since the last ice age was neither here nor there, it made a great photo op and garnered some support from the barking mad green brigade.
With boring predictability the catastrophic flooding was being spun by the political machines and the grant chasing vested interests, led of course by the BBC, as the result of Man Made Global Warming or to use the current term, Climate Change.
They fail to mention that the dredging and draining operations that had made the land arable for hundreds of years were deliberately stopped by the Environment Agency on orders from the European Union. This deliberate act of vandalism was carried out in order to turn farmland into wetlands to provide more habitat for birds, frogs and waterlilies. (More about the EA here)
The livelihoods of hundreds of farming families and their associated industries together with the country's capacity for food production are not even a consideration for these political zealots and their fellow travelers in the environmental industry.
While the cynical political class made their choreographed visits with their camera teams then departed when the right shots were in the can, Princes William and Harry arrived unannounced in a flooded area and got down to some serious work helping with the flood defences. Unlike the political whores they didn't leave after a few minutes, they put in a ten hour shift of manual labour.
Missing from action was the leader of the Environment Agency and socialist icon Chris Smith, the man who oversaw the cessation of dredging and drainage pumping. The buck stops with him therefore he and his henchmen must take responsibility for the flooding and the subsequent loss of livelihoods in the farming communities.
Despite the fact that farm workers were the first of the working classes to form a trade union, a movement which eventually spawned the Labour Party, this is one section of the working class that was sacrificed on the alter of the environmental zealots that infest Westminster and Brussels.
It's ironic that the Tolpuddle Martyrs were transported to the Australian penal colony for their trouble while their farming descendants are deliberately flooded out their farms and homes by their political descendants.
Chris Smith represents everything that stinks about the Labour Party and the corrupt political system that allows these useless people to prosper at the expense of the tax paying public regardless of their lack of capabilities, qualifications or experience.
Smith is one of the trendy, metropolitan elite that now professes to lead the working masses against their oppressors, which in their tiny minds includes the Royal family. He was born and bred in North London and after studying the arts went straight into party politics. At this point it unknown whether he has ever visited, let alone spent any quality time in the countryside or the agricultural communities he is deliberately destroying.
Smith climbed aboard the gravy train when he was elected a councilor then an MP. He was given a job in government as Secretary of State in the Orwellian, Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
After twenty years on the taxpayer ticket he announced his retirement from the House of Commons; if the hard pressed taxpayers thought their luck was in and they would be liberated from this freeloader they couldn't have been more wrong.
These parasites look after their own and as a result the socialist Smith was elevated to the House of Lords and adopted the aristocratic title, Baron Smith of Finsbury in the London Borough of Islington. He was appointed 'chair' of the Cultural Strategy Group by London's then communist mayor Ken Livingstone. Despite having no qualifications or experience outside of the art world, there followed a series of well numerated sinecures including 'chair' of the Advertising Standards Authority and the now notorious Environment Agency. Smith was back on the taxpayer funded gravy train with a vengeance and without a single vote being cast.
Smith has eleven sinecures in all with the EA alone providing a very acceptable six figure salary for a three day working week. Nice work if you can get.
If anyone is curious to know why such an unqualified socialist non-entity is so highly thought of in the world of 'progressive' politics then its worth remembering that Smith was the first member of the House of Commons to 'come out' and declare his homosexuality. Ticking this box is worth almost as much as a degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics which is the current 'in' qualification for political office.
One has to wonder if in addition to his homosexuality Smith had obtained a PPE degree he may have made Prime Minister or even been a replacement Queen.
In conclusion it is worth looking at the biographies of the Princes William and Harry and then that of Chris Smith. The comparisons are stark - while these admittedly privileged young men have suffered the tragedy of losing their mother at a young age, they didn't dwell on it or let it affect their self esteem. They were exclusively educated and they both embarked on military careers which included active service in Afghanistan and in the case of Prince William, in the Falkland Islands after a bout of sabre rattling by the Argentinians.
Their charity work has included getting down and dirty, including toilet cleaning in Belize and doing hands on work in various places in Africa including Lesotho. They are also involved in various Aids/HIV charities started by their late mother Princess Diana.
Prince Harry has embarked on expeditions to North and South Poles and Mount Everest on behalf of the Walking with the Wounded project. He is involved in Wounded Warrior projects in both the USA and Great Britain.
Chris Smith on the other hand, despite being a leader of the working classes, has never got his hands dirty in the whole of his taxpayer funded worthless life. He spends his time as a professional bureaucrat, raking in a fortune by imposing socialism and destroying the livelihoods of those he is supposed to champion.
He joins his fellow millionaire socialists. Phony Tony Blair, Red Ed Milband and the Balls family duo in representing the poor, the dispossessed and the downtrodden from their exclusive residences and in the case of Blair all seven of them.
In the final analysis its worth asking the question that, rich or poor, when the brown stuff hits the fan who would you rather have watching your back in a trench?
As a life long member of the working class I know who I'd prefer.
Please note: Thanks to Ex Bootneck and The Mellow Jihadi website for inspiring this bout of keyboard violence on the odious Lord Smith. Great site and always worth a visit.
In the meantime the leadership of the working classes all come from the same mold and judging by their taxpayer funded wealth, and by the way their offspring are lining themselves up for 'safe' Labour Party constituencies, they are not far from being a hereditary monarchy themselves.
One has to have a heart of stone not to laugh at these idiots as they champion the proletariat from the comfort of their multi-million pound town houses and profess their unbending loyalty to the working masses from their country mansions.
Not only the hypocrisy of these faux champions of the workers but their sheer buffoonery was put on display during the recent floods in the English countryside.
As was the case with the death of 'Madiba' Mandela, the political class can spot an opportunity to whore for votes. They were falling over themselves to get their photographs taken wearing Wellington boots and wearing concerning looks on their unconcerned faces. These political charlatans go into the flooded areas "to see for themselves" the extent of the flooding when a better sense of the damage can seen by watching newsreels on the television.
These appalling people swarm around human tragedy like flies around a dead cat if they think they can get a photo opportunity and few votes.
The British people can still be reduced to fits of laughter when they recall their PR and media created Prime Minister, David Cameron, travelling on a dog sled in Greenland "to see for himself" a glacier retreating supposedly due to Man Made Global Warming.
The fact that the glacier had been retreating since the last ice age was neither here nor there, it made a great photo op and garnered some support from the barking mad green brigade.
With boring predictability the catastrophic flooding was being spun by the political machines and the grant chasing vested interests, led of course by the BBC, as the result of Man Made Global Warming or to use the current term, Climate Change.
They fail to mention that the dredging and draining operations that had made the land arable for hundreds of years were deliberately stopped by the Environment Agency on orders from the European Union. This deliberate act of vandalism was carried out in order to turn farmland into wetlands to provide more habitat for birds, frogs and waterlilies. (More about the EA here)
The livelihoods of hundreds of farming families and their associated industries together with the country's capacity for food production are not even a consideration for these political zealots and their fellow travelers in the environmental industry.
While the cynical political class made their choreographed visits with their camera teams then departed when the right shots were in the can, Princes William and Harry arrived unannounced in a flooded area and got down to some serious work helping with the flood defences. Unlike the political whores they didn't leave after a few minutes, they put in a ten hour shift of manual labour.
Missing from action was the leader of the Environment Agency and socialist icon Chris Smith, the man who oversaw the cessation of dredging and drainage pumping. The buck stops with him therefore he and his henchmen must take responsibility for the flooding and the subsequent loss of livelihoods in the farming communities.
Despite the fact that farm workers were the first of the working classes to form a trade union, a movement which eventually spawned the Labour Party, this is one section of the working class that was sacrificed on the alter of the environmental zealots that infest Westminster and Brussels.
It's ironic that the Tolpuddle Martyrs were transported to the Australian penal colony for their trouble while their farming descendants are deliberately flooded out their farms and homes by their political descendants.
Chris Smith represents everything that stinks about the Labour Party and the corrupt political system that allows these useless people to prosper at the expense of the tax paying public regardless of their lack of capabilities, qualifications or experience.
Smith is one of the trendy, metropolitan elite that now professes to lead the working masses against their oppressors, which in their tiny minds includes the Royal family. He was born and bred in North London and after studying the arts went straight into party politics. At this point it unknown whether he has ever visited, let alone spent any quality time in the countryside or the agricultural communities he is deliberately destroying.
Smith climbed aboard the gravy train when he was elected a councilor then an MP. He was given a job in government as Secretary of State in the Orwellian, Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
After twenty years on the taxpayer ticket he announced his retirement from the House of Commons; if the hard pressed taxpayers thought their luck was in and they would be liberated from this freeloader they couldn't have been more wrong.
These parasites look after their own and as a result the socialist Smith was elevated to the House of Lords and adopted the aristocratic title, Baron Smith of Finsbury in the London Borough of Islington. He was appointed 'chair' of the Cultural Strategy Group by London's then communist mayor Ken Livingstone. Despite having no qualifications or experience outside of the art world, there followed a series of well numerated sinecures including 'chair' of the Advertising Standards Authority and the now notorious Environment Agency. Smith was back on the taxpayer funded gravy train with a vengeance and without a single vote being cast.
Smith has eleven sinecures in all with the EA alone providing a very acceptable six figure salary for a three day working week. Nice work if you can get.
If anyone is curious to know why such an unqualified socialist non-entity is so highly thought of in the world of 'progressive' politics then its worth remembering that Smith was the first member of the House of Commons to 'come out' and declare his homosexuality. Ticking this box is worth almost as much as a degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics which is the current 'in' qualification for political office.
One has to wonder if in addition to his homosexuality Smith had obtained a PPE degree he may have made Prime Minister or even been a replacement Queen.
In conclusion it is worth looking at the biographies of the Princes William and Harry and then that of Chris Smith. The comparisons are stark - while these admittedly privileged young men have suffered the tragedy of losing their mother at a young age, they didn't dwell on it or let it affect their self esteem. They were exclusively educated and they both embarked on military careers which included active service in Afghanistan and in the case of Prince William, in the Falkland Islands after a bout of sabre rattling by the Argentinians.
Their charity work has included getting down and dirty, including toilet cleaning in Belize and doing hands on work in various places in Africa including Lesotho. They are also involved in various Aids/HIV charities started by their late mother Princess Diana.
Prince Harry has embarked on expeditions to North and South Poles and Mount Everest on behalf of the Walking with the Wounded project. He is involved in Wounded Warrior projects in both the USA and Great Britain.
Chris Smith on the other hand, despite being a leader of the working classes, has never got his hands dirty in the whole of his taxpayer funded worthless life. He spends his time as a professional bureaucrat, raking in a fortune by imposing socialism and destroying the livelihoods of those he is supposed to champion.
He joins his fellow millionaire socialists. Phony Tony Blair, Red Ed Milband and the Balls family duo in representing the poor, the dispossessed and the downtrodden from their exclusive residences and in the case of Blair all seven of them.
In the final analysis its worth asking the question that, rich or poor, when the brown stuff hits the fan who would you rather have watching your back in a trench?
As a life long member of the working class I know who I'd prefer.
Please note: Thanks to Ex Bootneck and The Mellow Jihadi website for inspiring this bout of keyboard violence on the odious Lord Smith. Great site and always worth a visit.
Friday, February 14, 2014
FMG, Child Abuse, Honor Killings etc. - A Price Worth Paying For Multi-Culturalism?
It was interesting to read that British Members of Parliament, including one of the Labour Party's top female crusaders, Ann Clwyd, are campaigning against the barbaric practice of Female Genital Mutilation. As I understand it they are planning to outlaw the practice if they haven't done so already.
It also became apparent that Parliament have also legislated, or plan to legislate, against child brides, forced marriage, selective gender based abortions, tribal scarring plus a plethora of other ethnic based practices that have always been an anathema to the indigenous British people.
This sudden burst of legislative action based on ethnic practices raises several important issues that need to be brought out into the open and examined in the clear light day regardless of the fact that the political class would rather they were kept in the dark and left undiscussed.
The hard pressed and much abused British people deserve an explanation and it is up to people like Ann Clwyd and her multi-culturalist comrades to provide it.
Firstly one has to remember that there is an election imminent where the universally unpopular issues of mass immigration and forced multi-culturalism will be high on the peoples agenda.
One question that needs answering is why is the government criminalizing some ethnic practices when they are studiously ignoring illegal ethnic practices in other areas?
Another question is why are they legislating against ethnic practices at all, isn't accepting different cultural and ethnic practices all part of the multi-cultural society Clwyd and her Labour Party comrades are imposing?
The British people are being continually told by the various party political spin machines that these practices are culturally enriching and a welcome addition to Great Britain's new diverse society. If that's the case then multi-culturalists like Ann Clwyd and her ilk must accept these cultures in their entirety warts and all. They cannot say out one side of their mouths that all cultures are equal and their practices must be respected, then legislate to outlaw the practices they disapprove of.
Multi-culturalism coupled with cultural relativism is their long planned agenda therefore they cannot pick and choose which practices are acceptable however uncivilised and barbaric they may be.
The whole idea of multi-culturalism was sold to the various immigrant communities with the promise that the old Great Britain is dead and gone, when they come to the 'new' modern Great Britain there would be no requirement to change their cultural practices or adapt to the British way of life.
In fact the reverse was true, the indigenous British people would be forced under threat of smear and prosecution into rejecting the values and practices of their own culture and accepting practices that were considered as taboo in order to accommodate these incompatible alien cultures.
One classic example is that of halal meat - slaughtering animals in accordance with Islamic tradition is illegal in Great Britain under its animal cruelty laws but the law enforcement establishment, in the form of the police 'service', refuse to arrest or prosecute Muslims for breaking these laws. Kick the neighbours dog for crapping your lawn and they'll send around a SWAT team faster than you can say Inshalla.
In the case of more serious crimes the police 'service' and politicians like Ann Clwyd have turned a blind eye to spousal abuse and barbaric child abuse as in the cases of the Muslim paedophile gangs that operate almost with impunity in most major British cities.
The reason they give for their selective application of the law is 'cultural sensitivity' or preserving 'community cohesion'. It must be obvious to all informed people that selectively applying law based on ethnic considerations is racist in the extreme.
If an ordinary member of the indigenous British public indulged in such ethnic profiling they would be charged with a hate crime and be punished under the full force of the law.
It is worth noting at this point the law mentioned in the previous paragraph is selectively applied to the indigenous British people only; hate preachers and jihadists such as Anjem 'Andy' Choudary are free to spout whatever anti- British filth they please unmolested by the police 'service'.
The list of enriching cultural practices that the British people have been forced to accept by Clwyd and her ilk are both varied and disturbing.
Female Genital Mutilation is one of the most barbaric with sixty thousand victims in Great Britain. There are some twenty three thousand young girls under the age of fifteen at risk.
Honour Killings is a the politically correct name given by the multi-culturalists for cold blooded, premeditated murder when carried out by member of an ethnic group. This is type of killing is normal in some cultures and is not recognized as a crime in countries such as Pakistan.
Forced Marriage including child brides is normal practice in many cultures but is particularly prevalent in Muslim communities. Older uncles marrying younger nieces, some as young as five years old, is another appalling practice that authorities have ignored for decades. High incidents birth defects among immigrant communities is put down to rampant inbreeding.
Gendercide and selective abortion is technically illegal but gender selective abortion is available to Asian immigrants so it can be assumed that the authorities are aware of it but turn a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity' or 'community cohesion'.
Ann Clwyd and the vocal section of the women's rights industry should note that there are 1,400 to 4,700 girls missing from the British population only because of their gender.
Muslim paedophilia and other child abuse issues are up there as one of the most appalling cultural practices that have been foisted on the British people. The fact that the authorities in the towns and cities concerned turned a blind eye is shocking in the extreme. How these people can live with themselves let alone sleep at night when they knew young under age girls were being subjected to the vilest sexual abuse should be beyond any civilised person.
The list of practices and behaviors that the British people have been forced to accept under the threat of smear and prosecution is a long one and includes:
Human trafficking and slavery
Forced prostitution and sex slavery, including children male and female.
Tribal scarring of babies.
As they hide away in their taxpayer funded residences Ann Clwyd and her multi-cultural cronies in the Labour Party are never subjected to consequences they have forced other people to suffer and they never answer the question of how the British people are benefiting from their open door mass immigration policy?
How are the British people benefiting and what is enriching about the bridge people of Heston?
How is this immigrant camp at the old Hendon football ground enriching?
How is this the fouling up of one of London's most iconic areas enriching?
It must be remembered that forced multi-culturalism is not a victimless crime, there are over a hundred murdered people who would be alive today had it not been for the Labour Party and its mass immigration/cultural replacement policy. There are also tens of thousands of victims who would be unbeaten and unraped had it not been for people like Ann Clwyd and her ilk.
Whatever happened to the genteel green and pleasant land of a couple of decades ago with cricket on the village green, warm beer and old maids cycling to Evensong on a balmy summer evening. What did the British people do wrong that they deserved their lives to be blighted in this way.
The answer is simple and if the British people are naive enough to believe the promises of the politicians then they deserve all they get. They are lying to appease your anger and garner your vote. Don't fall for it, kick them out.
The destruction of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture was long planned by a global 'progressive' elite to which the current political leadership are subservient. They are determined to push this cultural replacement agenda through until their multi-cultural is fully imposed.
If readers don't believe what I write then maybe the UN's professional resident bureaucrat on migration will be more convincing.
Peter Sutherland is adamant that Great Britain and Europe should open up its borders and be ethnically cleansed, to this end the UN will allow no backtracking by the current British political leadership.
He's at it again here on the BBC urging the EU to deliberately 'undermine national homogeneity'. In other words the EU should ethnically cleanse itself of all indigenous people.
If ever there was a candidate for dancing the Tyburn jig then this Nazi inspired buffoon is surely it.
It also became apparent that Parliament have also legislated, or plan to legislate, against child brides, forced marriage, selective gender based abortions, tribal scarring plus a plethora of other ethnic based practices that have always been an anathema to the indigenous British people.
This sudden burst of legislative action based on ethnic practices raises several important issues that need to be brought out into the open and examined in the clear light day regardless of the fact that the political class would rather they were kept in the dark and left undiscussed.
The hard pressed and much abused British people deserve an explanation and it is up to people like Ann Clwyd and her multi-culturalist comrades to provide it.
Firstly one has to remember that there is an election imminent where the universally unpopular issues of mass immigration and forced multi-culturalism will be high on the peoples agenda.
One question that needs answering is why is the government criminalizing some ethnic practices when they are studiously ignoring illegal ethnic practices in other areas?
Another question is why are they legislating against ethnic practices at all, isn't accepting different cultural and ethnic practices all part of the multi-cultural society Clwyd and her Labour Party comrades are imposing?
The British people are being continually told by the various party political spin machines that these practices are culturally enriching and a welcome addition to Great Britain's new diverse society. If that's the case then multi-culturalists like Ann Clwyd and her ilk must accept these cultures in their entirety warts and all. They cannot say out one side of their mouths that all cultures are equal and their practices must be respected, then legislate to outlaw the practices they disapprove of.
Multi-culturalism coupled with cultural relativism is their long planned agenda therefore they cannot pick and choose which practices are acceptable however uncivilised and barbaric they may be.
The whole idea of multi-culturalism was sold to the various immigrant communities with the promise that the old Great Britain is dead and gone, when they come to the 'new' modern Great Britain there would be no requirement to change their cultural practices or adapt to the British way of life.
In fact the reverse was true, the indigenous British people would be forced under threat of smear and prosecution into rejecting the values and practices of their own culture and accepting practices that were considered as taboo in order to accommodate these incompatible alien cultures.
One classic example is that of halal meat - slaughtering animals in accordance with Islamic tradition is illegal in Great Britain under its animal cruelty laws but the law enforcement establishment, in the form of the police 'service', refuse to arrest or prosecute Muslims for breaking these laws. Kick the neighbours dog for crapping your lawn and they'll send around a SWAT team faster than you can say Inshalla.
In the case of more serious crimes the police 'service' and politicians like Ann Clwyd have turned a blind eye to spousal abuse and barbaric child abuse as in the cases of the Muslim paedophile gangs that operate almost with impunity in most major British cities.
The reason they give for their selective application of the law is 'cultural sensitivity' or preserving 'community cohesion'. It must be obvious to all informed people that selectively applying law based on ethnic considerations is racist in the extreme.
If an ordinary member of the indigenous British public indulged in such ethnic profiling they would be charged with a hate crime and be punished under the full force of the law.
It is worth noting at this point the law mentioned in the previous paragraph is selectively applied to the indigenous British people only; hate preachers and jihadists such as Anjem 'Andy' Choudary are free to spout whatever anti- British filth they please unmolested by the police 'service'.
The list of enriching cultural practices that the British people have been forced to accept by Clwyd and her ilk are both varied and disturbing.
Female Genital Mutilation is one of the most barbaric with sixty thousand victims in Great Britain. There are some twenty three thousand young girls under the age of fifteen at risk.
Honour Killings is a the politically correct name given by the multi-culturalists for cold blooded, premeditated murder when carried out by member of an ethnic group. This is type of killing is normal in some cultures and is not recognized as a crime in countries such as Pakistan.
Forced Marriage including child brides is normal practice in many cultures but is particularly prevalent in Muslim communities. Older uncles marrying younger nieces, some as young as five years old, is another appalling practice that authorities have ignored for decades. High incidents birth defects among immigrant communities is put down to rampant inbreeding.
Gendercide and selective abortion is technically illegal but gender selective abortion is available to Asian immigrants so it can be assumed that the authorities are aware of it but turn a blind eye for reasons of 'cultural sensitivity' or 'community cohesion'.
Ann Clwyd and the vocal section of the women's rights industry should note that there are 1,400 to 4,700 girls missing from the British population only because of their gender.
Muslim paedophilia and other child abuse issues are up there as one of the most appalling cultural practices that have been foisted on the British people. The fact that the authorities in the towns and cities concerned turned a blind eye is shocking in the extreme. How these people can live with themselves let alone sleep at night when they knew young under age girls were being subjected to the vilest sexual abuse should be beyond any civilised person.
The list of practices and behaviors that the British people have been forced to accept under the threat of smear and prosecution is a long one and includes:
Human trafficking and slavery
Forced prostitution and sex slavery, including children male and female.
Tribal scarring of babies.
As they hide away in their taxpayer funded residences Ann Clwyd and her multi-cultural cronies in the Labour Party are never subjected to consequences they have forced other people to suffer and they never answer the question of how the British people are benefiting from their open door mass immigration policy?
How are the British people benefiting and what is enriching about the bridge people of Heston?
How is this immigrant camp at the old Hendon football ground enriching?
How is this the fouling up of one of London's most iconic areas enriching?
It must be remembered that forced multi-culturalism is not a victimless crime, there are over a hundred murdered people who would be alive today had it not been for the Labour Party and its mass immigration/cultural replacement policy. There are also tens of thousands of victims who would be unbeaten and unraped had it not been for people like Ann Clwyd and her ilk.
Whatever happened to the genteel green and pleasant land of a couple of decades ago with cricket on the village green, warm beer and old maids cycling to Evensong on a balmy summer evening. What did the British people do wrong that they deserved their lives to be blighted in this way.
The answer is simple and if the British people are naive enough to believe the promises of the politicians then they deserve all they get. They are lying to appease your anger and garner your vote. Don't fall for it, kick them out.
The destruction of Great Britain's unique Anglo/Saxon/Celtic culture was long planned by a global 'progressive' elite to which the current political leadership are subservient. They are determined to push this cultural replacement agenda through until their multi-cultural is fully imposed.
If readers don't believe what I write then maybe the UN's professional resident bureaucrat on migration will be more convincing.
Peter Sutherland is adamant that Great Britain and Europe should open up its borders and be ethnically cleansed, to this end the UN will allow no backtracking by the current British political leadership.
He's at it again here on the BBC urging the EU to deliberately 'undermine national homogeneity'. In other words the EU should ethnically cleanse itself of all indigenous people.
If ever there was a candidate for dancing the Tyburn jig then this Nazi inspired buffoon is surely it.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
The Mighty Google Caves In To Censorship And Political Correctness Again
To the old adage that death and taxes are the only two certainties in this world I will add a third, it is certain that when politicians feel threatened they will censor.
It goes without saying that the Internet is greatest invention since the printing press, possibly the greatest invention ever when it comes to freedom and individual liberty. It allows ordinary citizens access to news and information free from the spin and sanitizing that is being carried out by those that have usurped political power and corrupted it for their own ends.
Freedom of information combined with citizens having access to opinions outside of the incestuous political cesspit puts the fear of God into every political charlatan who has a lust for power or an agenda to impose.
After some piece of information was leaked into the public domain, one appointed European Union bureaucrat was quoted as saying that something must be done about the Internet because "we cannot have unregulated opinion".
This chap was obviously a communist party apparatchik recently emerged from one of the former Soviet bloc countries. The EU bureaucracy is infested with these idiots who have lived all their lives with press censorship, state broadcasting and official communiques.
Coming to the west and having to justify his policies, instead of imposing them and imprisoning anyone who had the temerity to ask a question, must have been a shock to his system. How he must long for those good old days of censorship and "regulated opinion".
What is dangerous for freedom loving nations and those people that value their individual liberty is that the traditional western politicians and their attendant bureaucrats are adopting the attitudes of their eastern counterparts when it comes to public information and opinions.
To counter the access of information by ordinary citizens there has been an explosive increase in spin doctors, media management professionals and outright propagandists. There is not an industry or government department that doesn't employ an army of spin doctors. Even individual departments within an industry has its own compliment of spin doctors and media managers.
The problem for the political class and their bureaucrats is that their spin doctors and media managers are no longer having the desired effect. Masses of previously uninformed people are learning to think for themselves and stubbornly refusing to believe official information and "regulated opinion".
This is a very dangerous situation indeed for the political class and their response so far has been limited to crude attempts at censorship. The Leverson Inquiry into press freedom is a classic example of politicians using spurious incidents in an attempt to subject the press to government control.
In this case they used phone hacking and celebrity privacy as the excuse to censor the press, even though phone hacking is a criminal offence where the perpetrators could have been prosecuted. Using the underhand tactics to which we the people have become accustomed, instead of prosecuting the hackers the political class censored the press.
With the written press subject to government control the precedent has been established therefore they can now turn their attention to the real enemy. This is the Internet and its armies of citizen journalists sharing their "unregulated opinions" with a global audience.
The "unregulated opinions" and the unofficial language in which they are framed is effective in raising awareness of issues and attitudes that the political class would rather not be aired or discussed. They have resorted to abusing all the power they can muster to force Internet providers into politically correct conformity.
Google have rolled over and given in to political pressure and have removed search suggestions for British cities that are considered to be politically incorrect by the agenda driven fanatics that dominate British life.
As a measure of their fanaticism for their multi-cultural agenda, the political class and its agents are increasing their use of political correctness to close down any discussion that might raise awareness of their malign intentions for Great Britain and the west.
Typing "Why is"..followed by a cities name and its ethnic group is laughingly referred to as "vile racist search suggestions".
Its a well know tactic of the authoritarian multi-cultural fanatics to call any negative reference to race and ethnicity as "vile", particularly if it refers to non white and non Christian groups.
One example quoted in the article was the search, "Why is Bradford full of Pakis". This is being classed as a vile racist search suggestion but would typing in the words "Why is Cardiff full of Taffy's" be considered as vile racism? I am a Welshman and I am not offended in the slightest nor do I consider it a "vile racist search suggestion".
Everyone should know by now that Bradford is actually full of Pakistanis, therefore are searches such as "Why is Glasgow full Jock's" or " Why is Dublin full of Paddy's" vile racist search suggestions?
What would our American cousins think of "Why is New York full of Yanks" or better still "Why is Tennessee full of Hillbillies".
Sexuality is bound to be the next target with "Why is Brighton full of homosexuals" or "Why is San Fransisco full of freaks and weirdo's".
It is a shame that the people who run Google didn't stand firm in the interests of free speech and liberty by telling the political class, together with its attendant armies of sycophantic bureaucrats, where to stick their censorship and political correctness.
I assume that there are some astute people at Google who should know that these fanatics will never ever give up the pursuit of their perverted agenda and sooner or later Google will have to make a stand.
The alternative is to hand over the running of your company to the state apparatus and the freedom for individuals around the world to discuss the issues that they want to discuss and in the manner in which they want to discuss them, will be lost to the fanatical proponents of political correctness and "regulated opinion".
It goes without saying that the Internet is greatest invention since the printing press, possibly the greatest invention ever when it comes to freedom and individual liberty. It allows ordinary citizens access to news and information free from the spin and sanitizing that is being carried out by those that have usurped political power and corrupted it for their own ends.
Freedom of information combined with citizens having access to opinions outside of the incestuous political cesspit puts the fear of God into every political charlatan who has a lust for power or an agenda to impose.
After some piece of information was leaked into the public domain, one appointed European Union bureaucrat was quoted as saying that something must be done about the Internet because "we cannot have unregulated opinion".
This chap was obviously a communist party apparatchik recently emerged from one of the former Soviet bloc countries. The EU bureaucracy is infested with these idiots who have lived all their lives with press censorship, state broadcasting and official communiques.
Coming to the west and having to justify his policies, instead of imposing them and imprisoning anyone who had the temerity to ask a question, must have been a shock to his system. How he must long for those good old days of censorship and "regulated opinion".
What is dangerous for freedom loving nations and those people that value their individual liberty is that the traditional western politicians and their attendant bureaucrats are adopting the attitudes of their eastern counterparts when it comes to public information and opinions.
To counter the access of information by ordinary citizens there has been an explosive increase in spin doctors, media management professionals and outright propagandists. There is not an industry or government department that doesn't employ an army of spin doctors. Even individual departments within an industry has its own compliment of spin doctors and media managers.
The problem for the political class and their bureaucrats is that their spin doctors and media managers are no longer having the desired effect. Masses of previously uninformed people are learning to think for themselves and stubbornly refusing to believe official information and "regulated opinion".
This is a very dangerous situation indeed for the political class and their response so far has been limited to crude attempts at censorship. The Leverson Inquiry into press freedom is a classic example of politicians using spurious incidents in an attempt to subject the press to government control.
In this case they used phone hacking and celebrity privacy as the excuse to censor the press, even though phone hacking is a criminal offence where the perpetrators could have been prosecuted. Using the underhand tactics to which we the people have become accustomed, instead of prosecuting the hackers the political class censored the press.
With the written press subject to government control the precedent has been established therefore they can now turn their attention to the real enemy. This is the Internet and its armies of citizen journalists sharing their "unregulated opinions" with a global audience.
The "unregulated opinions" and the unofficial language in which they are framed is effective in raising awareness of issues and attitudes that the political class would rather not be aired or discussed. They have resorted to abusing all the power they can muster to force Internet providers into politically correct conformity.
Google have rolled over and given in to political pressure and have removed search suggestions for British cities that are considered to be politically incorrect by the agenda driven fanatics that dominate British life.
As a measure of their fanaticism for their multi-cultural agenda, the political class and its agents are increasing their use of political correctness to close down any discussion that might raise awareness of their malign intentions for Great Britain and the west.
Typing "Why is"..followed by a cities name and its ethnic group is laughingly referred to as "vile racist search suggestions".
Its a well know tactic of the authoritarian multi-cultural fanatics to call any negative reference to race and ethnicity as "vile", particularly if it refers to non white and non Christian groups.
One example quoted in the article was the search, "Why is Bradford full of Pakis". This is being classed as a vile racist search suggestion but would typing in the words "Why is Cardiff full of Taffy's" be considered as vile racism? I am a Welshman and I am not offended in the slightest nor do I consider it a "vile racist search suggestion".
Everyone should know by now that Bradford is actually full of Pakistanis, therefore are searches such as "Why is Glasgow full Jock's" or " Why is Dublin full of Paddy's" vile racist search suggestions?
What would our American cousins think of "Why is New York full of Yanks" or better still "Why is Tennessee full of Hillbillies".
Sexuality is bound to be the next target with "Why is Brighton full of homosexuals" or "Why is San Fransisco full of freaks and weirdo's".
It is a shame that the people who run Google didn't stand firm in the interests of free speech and liberty by telling the political class, together with its attendant armies of sycophantic bureaucrats, where to stick their censorship and political correctness.
I assume that there are some astute people at Google who should know that these fanatics will never ever give up the pursuit of their perverted agenda and sooner or later Google will have to make a stand.
The alternative is to hand over the running of your company to the state apparatus and the freedom for individuals around the world to discuss the issues that they want to discuss and in the manner in which they want to discuss them, will be lost to the fanatical proponents of political correctness and "regulated opinion".
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Tweedledum and Tweedledumber - French Surrender Monkey Is Obama's New BFF
For those who follow the international political scene it was inevitable that the two Presidents who share an ideology would eventually join together to celebrate their common philosophical ideals and their subsequent perceived 'achievements'.
It must be noted that they have a lot in common to celebrate - President Obama's America and President Hollande's France are both disappearing around the U-bend faster than the French surrender at Campiegne in 1940 - this rapid demise is due to the imposition of tried, tested and failed 19th century socialist policies.
Like two long lost friends, this pair of ideological soulmates quaff champagne and indulge in a taxpayer funded banquet that would grace the palaces of Louis XVI and Marie Antionette as they compare notes and congratulate themselves on taxing 'the rich' and alleviating poverty with more food stamps and welfare entitlements.
This dynamic duo of financial death and destruction are either in denial about the detrimental effect their policies have on their respective economies or they are doing it deliberately in order to build a new socialist paradise out of the rubble. Either way it's obvious that they don't care a jot about the hardship and misery they are visiting upon their populations as it is appears that poverty and misery are a price worth paying for their socialist Utopia.
As both of these 'world leaders' cement their new found friendship and indulge in an orgy of mutual self congratulation and backscratching, it's worth the American people taking stock of history in case the actions of their President alienate their real friends who have co-operated with them and expended blood and treasure when other nations ran away, hid or surrendered.
World War I is a good place to start where Great Britain and its Commonwealth were joined by the United States to liberate the French people from their German conquerors and their French collaborators, both military and civilian.
World War II is another good place to look where Great Britain and its Commonwealth were joined by the United States to liberate the French people from their German conquerors and their French collaborators both military and civilian.
In an act of ingratitude for the sacrifice of their precious sons, French leader General Charles De Gaulle was heard to say that he wouldn't be happy until the last American was gone from French soil to which Harry S. Truman inquired if that included those buried in the cemeteries at Normandy?
The French people's post war President, Charles de Gaulle, had a hatred for America that was palpable, visceral and all consuming. This hatred became a national trait which was carried on by future French Presidents, from the buffoon Georges Pompidou to the socialist nut job and serial fornicator Francois Mitterand. The noble French tradition of America baiting was carried on by the career corruptocrat and universally popular (among the French people) Jacques Chirac.
Chirac had a particular dislike of both Great Britain and America, describing their shared culture of individual liberty and free enterprise as "Anglo-Saxon ultra liberalism". This not surprising coming from a career politician and bureaucrat who started his political life in the French communist party and switched allegiance depending on the prevailing political winds.
De Gaulle's animosity toward America prompted him to withdraw the French military from the NATO command structure and expel the organisation from its headquarters at Fontainbleau.
It is worth noting that de Gaulle didn't hate America quite enough to withdraw the French from NATO entirely. With the cold war getting colder there was every likelihood the French would need their sorry ar*es rescued a third time when the inevitable surrender to the belligerent Russians took place.
Despite making a commitment to protect their colonial possessions in Indo-China from communism, the French ran away and left the people of Vietnam at the mercy of the Chinese and their agents. This infamous act of international treachery cost over fifty-eight thousand American lives. They did the same with their colonial possessions in Africa, including Algeria, where tens of thousands of people who considered themselves to be French were abandoned and subsequently slaughtered.
They undermined America in both Iran and Iraq and they also undermined Great Britain over the Falklands war. Despite the fact the he murdered some ten thousand of his own citizens, the French government gave arms and succor to the blood soaked Argentinian dictator, General Galtieri after his invasion of the Falkland Islands.
Following on from yesterdays essay referencing multi-millionaires from the hypocritical acting community who pass themselves off as champions of the poor and the downtrodden from behind their mansion walls and lakeside retreats, Presidents Obama and Hollande both champion the peasantry from the salubrious surroundings of the worlds most opulent residences. One the from the Presidential mansion on Pennsylvania Avenue and the other from the Elysee Palace in Paris.
Despite their supposed dedication to democracy and the will of the people, both these socialist pretenders have adopted an imperial air of grandeur reminiscent of the emperors of old. To illustrate the point perfectly, Emperor President Obama has unashamedly announced that if the democratically elected Congress doesn't do his bidding, he will rule by Executive decree.
NoEmperor President worthy of the name would appear at such an auspicious occasion without an exquisitely turned out lady on his arm. The Empress First Lady, Michelle Obama did the French President a great honour by emulating Marie Antoinette to a tee adorned in a $12,000 French inspired creation.
President Hollande was unable to bring the French First Lady on account she had ditched him because he was unable to keep his wandering todger under control and was caught shagging an actress. This was after he was caught shagging the First Lady behind the back of the mother of his four children.
It would appear that the Emperor Napoleon was much more adept at keeping his lover Josephine under wraps than Emperor Hollande was with the bint universally known as the Rottweiler.
Cynical opponents point out that the Michelle's dress alone would have kept a peasant family in food stamps for a year, let alone what the cost of the banquet could have provided. How can these people be so cynical? They obviously have no care for the image of the USA abroad, and more importantly, they have no care for the dignity of the position of First Lady, which as we know is priceless.
It is worth remembering that if anyone hates the British more than the French then it is President Obama himself. His first act on taking tenancy of the White House was to send back a bust of Sir Winston Churchill which was a gift from the British to the American people. His second act was to be photographed with his feet up on the historic Oval Office desk which was a gift from Queen Victoria in 1880 and was made from the timbers of the exploration ship HMS Resolute.
In conclusion it is worth reminding our American cousins that while the French prevaricated it was British soldiers who were the first to join the crusades into Iraq (twice) and Afghanistan, to help free their respective peoples from Muslim tyranny.
In addition it was that formidable combination of dedicated freedom fighters Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher that caused the Berlin Wall to fall and communism to collapse.
To downgrade this relationship in favour of the French, of all people, on the grounds of a shared socialist ideology is thoughtless and dangerous in the extreme.
It must be noted that they have a lot in common to celebrate - President Obama's America and President Hollande's France are both disappearing around the U-bend faster than the French surrender at Campiegne in 1940 - this rapid demise is due to the imposition of tried, tested and failed 19th century socialist policies.
Like two long lost friends, this pair of ideological soulmates quaff champagne and indulge in a taxpayer funded banquet that would grace the palaces of Louis XVI and Marie Antionette as they compare notes and congratulate themselves on taxing 'the rich' and alleviating poverty with more food stamps and welfare entitlements.
This dynamic duo of financial death and destruction are either in denial about the detrimental effect their policies have on their respective economies or they are doing it deliberately in order to build a new socialist paradise out of the rubble. Either way it's obvious that they don't care a jot about the hardship and misery they are visiting upon their populations as it is appears that poverty and misery are a price worth paying for their socialist Utopia.
As both of these 'world leaders' cement their new found friendship and indulge in an orgy of mutual self congratulation and backscratching, it's worth the American people taking stock of history in case the actions of their President alienate their real friends who have co-operated with them and expended blood and treasure when other nations ran away, hid or surrendered.
World War I is a good place to start where Great Britain and its Commonwealth were joined by the United States to liberate the French people from their German conquerors and their French collaborators, both military and civilian.
World War II is another good place to look where Great Britain and its Commonwealth were joined by the United States to liberate the French people from their German conquerors and their French collaborators both military and civilian.
In an act of ingratitude for the sacrifice of their precious sons, French leader General Charles De Gaulle was heard to say that he wouldn't be happy until the last American was gone from French soil to which Harry S. Truman inquired if that included those buried in the cemeteries at Normandy?
The French people's post war President, Charles de Gaulle, had a hatred for America that was palpable, visceral and all consuming. This hatred became a national trait which was carried on by future French Presidents, from the buffoon Georges Pompidou to the socialist nut job and serial fornicator Francois Mitterand. The noble French tradition of America baiting was carried on by the career corruptocrat and universally popular (among the French people) Jacques Chirac.
Chirac had a particular dislike of both Great Britain and America, describing their shared culture of individual liberty and free enterprise as "Anglo-Saxon ultra liberalism". This not surprising coming from a career politician and bureaucrat who started his political life in the French communist party and switched allegiance depending on the prevailing political winds.
De Gaulle's animosity toward America prompted him to withdraw the French military from the NATO command structure and expel the organisation from its headquarters at Fontainbleau.
It is worth noting that de Gaulle didn't hate America quite enough to withdraw the French from NATO entirely. With the cold war getting colder there was every likelihood the French would need their sorry ar*es rescued a third time when the inevitable surrender to the belligerent Russians took place.
Despite making a commitment to protect their colonial possessions in Indo-China from communism, the French ran away and left the people of Vietnam at the mercy of the Chinese and their agents. This infamous act of international treachery cost over fifty-eight thousand American lives. They did the same with their colonial possessions in Africa, including Algeria, where tens of thousands of people who considered themselves to be French were abandoned and subsequently slaughtered.
They undermined America in both Iran and Iraq and they also undermined Great Britain over the Falklands war. Despite the fact the he murdered some ten thousand of his own citizens, the French government gave arms and succor to the blood soaked Argentinian dictator, General Galtieri after his invasion of the Falkland Islands.
Following on from yesterdays essay referencing multi-millionaires from the hypocritical acting community who pass themselves off as champions of the poor and the downtrodden from behind their mansion walls and lakeside retreats, Presidents Obama and Hollande both champion the peasantry from the salubrious surroundings of the worlds most opulent residences. One the from the Presidential mansion on Pennsylvania Avenue and the other from the Elysee Palace in Paris.
Despite their supposed dedication to democracy and the will of the people, both these socialist pretenders have adopted an imperial air of grandeur reminiscent of the emperors of old. To illustrate the point perfectly,
No
President Hollande was unable to bring the French First Lady on account she had ditched him because he was unable to keep his wandering todger under control and was caught shagging an actress. This was after he was caught shagging the First Lady behind the back of the mother of his four children.
It would appear that the Emperor Napoleon was much more adept at keeping his lover Josephine under wraps than Emperor Hollande was with the bint universally known as the Rottweiler.
Cynical opponents point out that the Michelle's dress alone would have kept a peasant family in food stamps for a year, let alone what the cost of the banquet could have provided. How can these people be so cynical? They obviously have no care for the image of the USA abroad, and more importantly, they have no care for the dignity of the position of First Lady, which as we know is priceless.
It is worth remembering that if anyone hates the British more than the French then it is President Obama himself. His first act on taking tenancy of the White House was to send back a bust of Sir Winston Churchill which was a gift from the British to the American people. His second act was to be photographed with his feet up on the historic Oval Office desk which was a gift from Queen Victoria in 1880 and was made from the timbers of the exploration ship HMS Resolute.
In conclusion it is worth reminding our American cousins that while the French prevaricated it was British soldiers who were the first to join the crusades into Iraq (twice) and Afghanistan, to help free their respective peoples from Muslim tyranny.
In addition it was that formidable combination of dedicated freedom fighters Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher that caused the Berlin Wall to fall and communism to collapse.
To downgrade this relationship in favour of the French, of all people, on the grounds of a shared socialist ideology is thoughtless and dangerous in the extreme.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Ben Affleck - Another Millionaire Commie Puts His Hypocrisy On Display
Bearing in mind the disastrous consequences of their failed ideology, one of the most difficult things in the world to understand is what goes on inside the heads of the Hollywood acting fraternity. Alternatively, taking into account their voluminous wealth, what motivates them to behave the way they do toward those who don't share their political views?
Listening to the ramblings of any member of this sad community is difficult enough but listening to the hard left outpourings of a global celebrity such as super rich actor Ben Affleck is increasingly so.
Reading excerpts from his recent interview in Playboy magazine one has to wonder if he isn't a real life Manchurian Candidate operating under some kind of hypnotic spell or perhaps he is just plain bat shit crazy.
The only thing for certain is that he is one of a multitude of super wealthy actors and actresses who are as remote from the working classes as it is possible to be but are absolutely dedicated to the communist cause.
Some of Affleck's comments reveal the intolerance and bigotry that is inherent in their communist/socialist ideology and they also highlight the fact that he and his Hollywood comrades cannot see beyond their blinkered world view.
"When I watch a guy I know is a big Republican, part of me thinks, I probably wouldn't like this person if I met him, or we would have different opinions".
It would appear that Affleck will decide to dislike a person prior to meeting them if he knows in advance that their political persuasions differ. In the real world outside the Hollywood bubble different opinions are allowed and are actually the norm, he needs get out more and meet some real people.
Ben Affleck obviously doesn't care about the political persuasion of the audiences who pay to watch his movies and whose hard earned money finances his multi-millionaire life. What are the chances of Affleck and the rest of the Hollywood communist cabal putting out a notice that Republicans and non communists are not welcome to watch their movies?
As the informed world knows Affleck is not alone - Hollywood and the movie industry at large is infested with super wealthy America hating hypocrites who align themselves with the working class but who, in reality, might as well be on another planet. Despite their left wing pronouncements and claims of solidarity with the poor and downtrodden, they live their lives behind mansion walls patrolled by armed guards to keep the great unwashed out.
Affleck's communist fellow travelers include Sean Penn, who championed Venezuela's blood soaked tyrant Hugo Chavez whose communist policies bankrupted and impoverished a country which was awash with oil and other natural resources. Penn displays his ugliness and contempt for his fellow Americans by describing people with a different point of view to his, such as Senator Ted Cruz, as having "a mental health problem". That totalitarian opinion comes straight out of the KGB Handbook.
Working class champion and outspoken communist supporter Sean Penn is worth $150,000,000 and lives here.
The fragrant, innocent looking Julia Roberts casts aside her PR created image and puts her hatred and intolerance on full public display with comments such as "Republican comes in the dictionary just after reptile and just above repugnant". I'll wager that she doesn't mind Republicans paying to watch her movies or contributing to her enormous personal fortune.
In solidarity with the working classes, the poor and the downtrodden the not-so-innocent Julia Roberts is worth $140,000,000 and lives here.
The surgically enhanced half of the Sonny and Cher duo puts her bigotry and hypocrisy on display with "If you're black in this country, if you're a woman in this country, if you're a minority in this country, what could possibly possess you to vote Republican? You won't have one f*cking right left".
It is obviously lost on Cher that she is a woman, claims minority status and is one of the richest celebrities on the planet, financed in part by people who vote Republican.
Unlike the 'Gypsies Tramps and Thieves' she sings about, Cher is worth $305,000,000 and lives here.
To add to the list, one of Hollywood's most vociferous, and obnoxious, America hating communists is Michael Moore. This champion of the working class is worth $50,000,000 and lives here.
Leading Obama cheerleader and fundraiser extraordinaire George Clooney is worth $165,000,000 and lives here on the shores of Lake Como in Italy.
The centerpiece of this article Mr. Ben Affleck is worth $75,000,000 and lives here.
These people continually raise their voices against the one percent and the ruling class, oblivious to the fact that they are the one percent and the ruling class.
During Obama's re-election campaign these ultra hypocrites smeared and demonized 'the rich" at a thirty thousand dollar per head fundraising dinner. You really couldn't make it up.
One has to wonder if these champions of the working classes, the poor and the downtrodden understand what irony, hypocrisy or double standards actually mean or perhaps they are incapable of understanding anything that isn't driven by their perverted ideology.
In conclusion I would suggest that if these wealthy celebrities are serious and are genuine champions of the poor and the downtrodden they can actually do what their ideology demands and redistribute their own wealth without waiting for the Progressive in Chief, President Obama, to do it for them.
They can follow this up by emulating their French comrade, socialist President Francois Hollande, and implement a seventy five percent tax rate which should help pay for more welfare entitlements for the class they claim to champion.
Listening to the ramblings of any member of this sad community is difficult enough but listening to the hard left outpourings of a global celebrity such as super rich actor Ben Affleck is increasingly so.
Reading excerpts from his recent interview in Playboy magazine one has to wonder if he isn't a real life Manchurian Candidate operating under some kind of hypnotic spell or perhaps he is just plain bat shit crazy.
The only thing for certain is that he is one of a multitude of super wealthy actors and actresses who are as remote from the working classes as it is possible to be but are absolutely dedicated to the communist cause.
Some of Affleck's comments reveal the intolerance and bigotry that is inherent in their communist/socialist ideology and they also highlight the fact that he and his Hollywood comrades cannot see beyond their blinkered world view.
"When I watch a guy I know is a big Republican, part of me thinks, I probably wouldn't like this person if I met him, or we would have different opinions".
It would appear that Affleck will decide to dislike a person prior to meeting them if he knows in advance that their political persuasions differ. In the real world outside the Hollywood bubble different opinions are allowed and are actually the norm, he needs get out more and meet some real people.
Ben Affleck obviously doesn't care about the political persuasion of the audiences who pay to watch his movies and whose hard earned money finances his multi-millionaire life. What are the chances of Affleck and the rest of the Hollywood communist cabal putting out a notice that Republicans and non communists are not welcome to watch their movies?
As the informed world knows Affleck is not alone - Hollywood and the movie industry at large is infested with super wealthy America hating hypocrites who align themselves with the working class but who, in reality, might as well be on another planet. Despite their left wing pronouncements and claims of solidarity with the poor and downtrodden, they live their lives behind mansion walls patrolled by armed guards to keep the great unwashed out.
Affleck's communist fellow travelers include Sean Penn, who championed Venezuela's blood soaked tyrant Hugo Chavez whose communist policies bankrupted and impoverished a country which was awash with oil and other natural resources. Penn displays his ugliness and contempt for his fellow Americans by describing people with a different point of view to his, such as Senator Ted Cruz, as having "a mental health problem". That totalitarian opinion comes straight out of the KGB Handbook.
Working class champion and outspoken communist supporter Sean Penn is worth $150,000,000 and lives here.
The fragrant, innocent looking Julia Roberts casts aside her PR created image and puts her hatred and intolerance on full public display with comments such as "Republican comes in the dictionary just after reptile and just above repugnant". I'll wager that she doesn't mind Republicans paying to watch her movies or contributing to her enormous personal fortune.
In solidarity with the working classes, the poor and the downtrodden the not-so-innocent Julia Roberts is worth $140,000,000 and lives here.
The surgically enhanced half of the Sonny and Cher duo puts her bigotry and hypocrisy on display with "If you're black in this country, if you're a woman in this country, if you're a minority in this country, what could possibly possess you to vote Republican? You won't have one f*cking right left".
It is obviously lost on Cher that she is a woman, claims minority status and is one of the richest celebrities on the planet, financed in part by people who vote Republican.
Unlike the 'Gypsies Tramps and Thieves' she sings about, Cher is worth $305,000,000 and lives here.
To add to the list, one of Hollywood's most vociferous, and obnoxious, America hating communists is Michael Moore. This champion of the working class is worth $50,000,000 and lives here.
Leading Obama cheerleader and fundraiser extraordinaire George Clooney is worth $165,000,000 and lives here on the shores of Lake Como in Italy.
The centerpiece of this article Mr. Ben Affleck is worth $75,000,000 and lives here.
These people continually raise their voices against the one percent and the ruling class, oblivious to the fact that they are the one percent and the ruling class.
During Obama's re-election campaign these ultra hypocrites smeared and demonized 'the rich" at a thirty thousand dollar per head fundraising dinner. You really couldn't make it up.
One has to wonder if these champions of the working classes, the poor and the downtrodden understand what irony, hypocrisy or double standards actually mean or perhaps they are incapable of understanding anything that isn't driven by their perverted ideology.
In conclusion I would suggest that if these wealthy celebrities are serious and are genuine champions of the poor and the downtrodden they can actually do what their ideology demands and redistribute their own wealth without waiting for the Progressive in Chief, President Obama, to do it for them.
They can follow this up by emulating their French comrade, socialist President Francois Hollande, and implement a seventy five percent tax rate which should help pay for more welfare entitlements for the class they claim to champion.
Monday, February 10, 2014
Christians Killing Muslims In Central Africa - Outraged World Government To Act
News about the latest bloodletting in Africa should come as no surprise to anyone who takes just the briefest interest in global affairs - as a matter of fact the only surprise is that it's made the news at all, especially when the country involved is the obscure Central African Republic(CAR).
Bloodletting has been going on unreported for decades, and indeed is still going on, in places such as South Africa and Zimbabwe in the south, to Chad, Mali and Mauritania in the north.
Central African countries have their own place in the historical bloodletting Hall of Fame due to its unbridled savagery, with Rwanda and Burundi taking top place with over eight hundred thousand people butchered, mainly by means of the panga. (a foot long type of machete)
The killings in the central region of Africa have been ongoing since decolonization and is mainly between rival tribes and warlords fighting it out for political control, and in particular, for control of the areas rich natural resources.
In recent years the bloodletting has been exacerbated by the rise and spread of militant Islam and its desire to erase all other religions and subject everyone to its control.
For decades in places such as Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Chad, Pakistan and Iran, Christians have been systematically slaughtered in huge numbers, sometimes in the most horrific fashion, without so much as a squeak of protest from the international handwringing community, including the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope.
The list of attacks by Muslims on Christians is truly staggering but hardly raises a ripple among the professional bureaucrats from the UN, the EU, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the bleeding heart 'progressive' political class that infest the legislatures and institutions of western countries.
It is universally accepted nowadays that these supranational institutions and their compliant national governments have embarked on a global transformational agenda which requires equality of nations regardless of their individual states of development. Disparity between nations is eliminated by downgrading the developed world until they are more or less in line with the undeveloped world.
(For proof of this one only has to look at the sorry state of individual European countries compared to a decade ago and the rapid descent of America under the ultra progressive supranationalist Obama).
The eradication of Christians and Christianity, together with those nations whose culture and moral code is derived from Christianity, is therefore tolerated by the global 'progressive' elite and this can be verified by their reaction to events in the Central African Republic.
Briefly, the population of the Central African Republic is 80.3% Christian, 10.1% Muslim and 9.6% Indigenous beliefs. The Muslims, situated mainly in the north and backed by co-religionists from Sudan and Chad, overthrew the government and started to do what Muslims do best - use murder, violence and brutality to impose their religion on others.
The UN, the EU and the rest of the international handwringing community were relatively silent at this point only to wake up when the Christian community were forced to resist and fight back.
Unlike the inertia displayed when Christian communities were being slaughtered in Nigeria, Egypt, Sudan, Pakistan etc. the UN and France sent a force of peacekeepers to protect the Muslims from the people they had previously been violently subjugating.
The embattled Christian community were having none of the UN and France peacekeeping nonsense and continued to send the Muslim population packing declaring that they want every Muslim gone from their country.
This act of defiance and subsequent fight back set the alarm bells ringing among the supranational elite for obvious reasons: if this act of resistance by a Christian community was allowed to continue, other embattled populations might be emboldened and do the same, which could stall their transformational agenda and even put it into reverse.
The UN is authorizing the EU to send in troops and negotiators in attempt to broker a peace deal but the Christian resistance appears to be adamant; they have declared that there will be no reconciliation. It would appear that enough is enough and there is no going back.
In addition to this the usual suspects from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are monitoring the violence and sending their reports which are designed to garner sympathy but which only seem to have the opposite effect. The prevailing attitude seems to be that the Muslim community got what it deserved or is only getting a taste of their own medicine.
This is unfortunate because, as always, innocent people from all sides pay the biggest price in a civil war.
Again, unlike the mayhem and murder visited upon Christian communities in the aforementioned Muslim countries, the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC, a Ms. Fatou Bensouda, is instituting an investigation into possible war crimes.
At time of writing Ms. Bensouda doesn't appear to have instituted any such investigations in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran etc. even though the number of murdered Christians is astronomically higher and the methods of dispatch are more horrific and heinous. See the list again here.
The thoroughly discredited and increasingly useless UNHCR can't resist getting in on the act and is attempting to justify its existence by hand wringing about one hundred thousand refugees and possible war crimes committed during the Christian community resistance and fight back.
They weren't nearly so vociferous during the original overthrow nor during the decades of slaughter of Christians around the world.
Looking to raise his profile and that of his organization, one leader of the UNHCR, a Mr. Luis Moreno Ocampo, talked about issuing an arrest warrant for Colonel Gaddafi of Libya some forty one years after he came to power and tens of thousands of deaths later.
In an exhibition of total incompetence, some bureaucrat from the same organisation wanted the killing of Gaddafi investigated because the manner of his dispatch might have constituted a war crime.
In conclusion I will add that these supranational institutions are loaded to the rafters with taxpayer funded, agenda driven placemen and lifelong professional bureaucrats. They are so remote from real people who live in the real world that they might as well be from another planet. They are religiously committed to their transformational agenda; it is their only reason for living.
What we, the real people can do, is give whatever support we can to the Christian community in the Central African Republic and to people everywhere, regardless of their beliefs, who are resisting and fighting back against the deliberate downgrading and Islamification of their communities and countries.
Bloodletting has been going on unreported for decades, and indeed is still going on, in places such as South Africa and Zimbabwe in the south, to Chad, Mali and Mauritania in the north.
Central African countries have their own place in the historical bloodletting Hall of Fame due to its unbridled savagery, with Rwanda and Burundi taking top place with over eight hundred thousand people butchered, mainly by means of the panga. (a foot long type of machete)
The killings in the central region of Africa have been ongoing since decolonization and is mainly between rival tribes and warlords fighting it out for political control, and in particular, for control of the areas rich natural resources.
In recent years the bloodletting has been exacerbated by the rise and spread of militant Islam and its desire to erase all other religions and subject everyone to its control.
For decades in places such as Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Chad, Pakistan and Iran, Christians have been systematically slaughtered in huge numbers, sometimes in the most horrific fashion, without so much as a squeak of protest from the international handwringing community, including the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope.
The list of attacks by Muslims on Christians is truly staggering but hardly raises a ripple among the professional bureaucrats from the UN, the EU, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the bleeding heart 'progressive' political class that infest the legislatures and institutions of western countries.
It is universally accepted nowadays that these supranational institutions and their compliant national governments have embarked on a global transformational agenda which requires equality of nations regardless of their individual states of development. Disparity between nations is eliminated by downgrading the developed world until they are more or less in line with the undeveloped world.
(For proof of this one only has to look at the sorry state of individual European countries compared to a decade ago and the rapid descent of America under the ultra progressive supranationalist Obama).
The eradication of Christians and Christianity, together with those nations whose culture and moral code is derived from Christianity, is therefore tolerated by the global 'progressive' elite and this can be verified by their reaction to events in the Central African Republic.
Briefly, the population of the Central African Republic is 80.3% Christian, 10.1% Muslim and 9.6% Indigenous beliefs. The Muslims, situated mainly in the north and backed by co-religionists from Sudan and Chad, overthrew the government and started to do what Muslims do best - use murder, violence and brutality to impose their religion on others.
The UN, the EU and the rest of the international handwringing community were relatively silent at this point only to wake up when the Christian community were forced to resist and fight back.
Unlike the inertia displayed when Christian communities were being slaughtered in Nigeria, Egypt, Sudan, Pakistan etc. the UN and France sent a force of peacekeepers to protect the Muslims from the people they had previously been violently subjugating.
The embattled Christian community were having none of the UN and France peacekeeping nonsense and continued to send the Muslim population packing declaring that they want every Muslim gone from their country.
This act of defiance and subsequent fight back set the alarm bells ringing among the supranational elite for obvious reasons: if this act of resistance by a Christian community was allowed to continue, other embattled populations might be emboldened and do the same, which could stall their transformational agenda and even put it into reverse.
The UN is authorizing the EU to send in troops and negotiators in attempt to broker a peace deal but the Christian resistance appears to be adamant; they have declared that there will be no reconciliation. It would appear that enough is enough and there is no going back.
In addition to this the usual suspects from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are monitoring the violence and sending their reports which are designed to garner sympathy but which only seem to have the opposite effect. The prevailing attitude seems to be that the Muslim community got what it deserved or is only getting a taste of their own medicine.
This is unfortunate because, as always, innocent people from all sides pay the biggest price in a civil war.
Again, unlike the mayhem and murder visited upon Christian communities in the aforementioned Muslim countries, the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC, a Ms. Fatou Bensouda, is instituting an investigation into possible war crimes.
At time of writing Ms. Bensouda doesn't appear to have instituted any such investigations in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran etc. even though the number of murdered Christians is astronomically higher and the methods of dispatch are more horrific and heinous. See the list again here.
The thoroughly discredited and increasingly useless UNHCR can't resist getting in on the act and is attempting to justify its existence by hand wringing about one hundred thousand refugees and possible war crimes committed during the Christian community resistance and fight back.
They weren't nearly so vociferous during the original overthrow nor during the decades of slaughter of Christians around the world.
Looking to raise his profile and that of his organization, one leader of the UNHCR, a Mr. Luis Moreno Ocampo, talked about issuing an arrest warrant for Colonel Gaddafi of Libya some forty one years after he came to power and tens of thousands of deaths later.
In an exhibition of total incompetence, some bureaucrat from the same organisation wanted the killing of Gaddafi investigated because the manner of his dispatch might have constituted a war crime.
In conclusion I will add that these supranational institutions are loaded to the rafters with taxpayer funded, agenda driven placemen and lifelong professional bureaucrats. They are so remote from real people who live in the real world that they might as well be from another planet. They are religiously committed to their transformational agenda; it is their only reason for living.
What we, the real people can do, is give whatever support we can to the Christian community in the Central African Republic and to people everywhere, regardless of their beliefs, who are resisting and fighting back against the deliberate downgrading and Islamification of their communities and countries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)